Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Br. J. Cancer
55, 85 90
(1987), 55,
Br. J. Cancer (1987),
Press
Ltd.,
1987
86
clothing
2.1'
0.3
1.3
1.5
3.4
1.3
3.5
4.5
1.4
3.2
4.5
Dr-U<g ingestion
Chemotherapy/immune
suppressive
Antifungal drugs
TB drugs
Laxatives
Antimalarials
Eye drops
Tablets for
cramp
4.5
1.5
0.2
0.4
1.5
1.3
1.3
2.4
0.1
Social ti.spects
Jewish
1.4
origins
Occu'pationlindtustryI,
(at
6 months)
Administrators
3.2
Photographic industry
0.5
Negativ,e risks
The bulk of the negative risks shown in Table III along with
related topics without risk, are associated with lack of past
exposure to X-rays or cigarette smoking. Here the HD cases
were contrasted with a control group which excluded the
major smoking related non-malignant diseases; arterial disease
and chronic chest conditions.
Familial asso(iation
Table IV shows the detailed results for association with family
illness including all types of cancer and some more specific
commoner solid tumours as well as lymphoma/leukaemia.
The strongest association lies amongst the families for HD
cases: here 9 cases and 1 control had one or more further
HD cases in blood relatives. Overall multiple sclerosis (MS)
is barely associated with an excess in case families, however, it
is highly associated with male cases (Cases= 7, Controls=1,
RR = 14.4, P = 0.00 1).
Past medical history
Skin lesions show a significant 2 fold excess in cases as
detailed in Table V. This also shows the excess risk
associated with past urticaria and eczematous conditions.
Overall past infection with infectious mononucleosis (IM)
was not a risk (12 cases, 23 controls, RR= 1.0, P =0.94)
however, there was an excess of young male cases (aged
15-35 yr) who had had IM less than five years prior to
diagnosis (5 cases and 2 controls, RR =4.9, P=0.04).
Table VI gives the results for past dental anaesthesia which
essentially indicates an excessive risk for those who had
gaseous anaesthesia prior to 1960. This topic was not part of
the original interview proforma and was added later; as a
Sibship si-e
Sibship sizes are grouped in Table VII and analysed using
individuals with 5 or more siblings as a reference group. An
increasing risk is associated with decreasing sibship size.
Discussion
87
Table 11 Hodgkin's disease: Case control study. Topics giving non-significant responses
having risk ratios under 2.0 from pooled results.
1 Past medical history
TBa
Asthma
Any allergy
Food allergy
Fur allergy
Pollen/dust allergy
Soap allergy
Metal allergy
Drug allergy
Other allergy
Reaction to sunlight
Bite reaction
Tonsillectomy
Infectious mononucleosis
Appendectomy
Herpes zoster
2 Drug ingestion
Amphetamines
Contraceptive pill
Antibiotic
Analgesics
Antihistamines
Antinausea drops
Antacids
Benzodiazepines
Other tranquillizers
3 Social aspects
Received higher educationa
Lived on a farm
Ever been abroad
4 Occupations
Farmers
Miners
Dye/chemical workers
Glass workers
Furnace men
Electricians
Engineers
Woodworkers
Leather workers
Textile workers
Clothing workers
Food industry workers
Printers
Construction workers
5. Industrial
Chemical
Petroleum
Agriculture
6 Contact uwith
Live animals
Dead animals
Wood dust
Solvents
6.16
15.40
73.153
8.18
7.17
25.45
5.11
3.14
29.56
22.51
20.46
23.58
54.131
12.23
34.78
11.16
Malaria
Personality disorder
Migraine
Otitis media
Rheumatic fever
Hypertension
Myocardial infarction
Angina
Pneumonia
Duodenal ulcer
Osteoarthritis
Past malignancy
Radiotherapy
4.9
17.28
4.7
10.13
2.11
9.16
5.7
1.8
8.9
16.27
7.14
4.9
5.10
12.16
39.77
16.24
16.33
6.11
2.7
10.22
33.77
25.32
Bronchodilation
Steroids
Endocrine
Vitamins
Tar based cream
Migraine tablets
Drugs for heart disease
Anti-inflammatory drugs
Hormones
9.28
20.32
4.7
5.7
4.8
2.8
24.47
20.32
3.8
30.53
14.27
102.271
Pet owner
Household spray user
Hair spray user
219.423
156.324
62.133
21.47
5.15
16.27
4.10
8.10
31.52
62.127
16.28
5.6
30.51
28.47
24.64
6.19
26.49
Painters
Labourers
Transport workers
Warehouse men
Clerks
Sales workers
Service workers
Professional workers
Armed forces
Nurses
Spinners
Dry cleaners
Sports and recreational
5.15
2.8
27.74
6.20
44.61
53.126
67.134
28.57
29.62
6.16
6.19
6.14
8.12
20.34
5.13
29.45
Wood workers
Hospital workers
16.37
20.41
33.71
18.40
24.46
55.121
Fertilizers
Spray paint
Epoxy glue
Irradiation
38.55
20.44
41.75
6.16
aNumbers indicate total number of cases and control in series in that order.
however, that the link with steroids in the pilot study was
accounted for mainly by non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)
in the pooled lymphoid matignancies group. Other skin
conditions, excluding eczema or dermatitis, also proved to be
significantly associated with HD. Urticaria was identified as
the strongest risk factor in the group, reaching significance
in the 15-35 year old nodular sclerosing (NS) HD subgroup,
when sexes were pooled. This has not been identified in
previous studies, but is consistent with the immune
perturbation hypothesis.
The study has produced interesting observations on past
dental anaesthesia. Prior to 1960 general anaesthesia would
E
88
Table Ill
Risk
Confidence
(a.se
(ontrol
r-l/tio
i.nterval
143
13
25
225
169
133
326
99
70
465
368
301
0.7
0.3
1.0
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5-0.9
0.2-0.5
0.6-1.7
0.3-0.9
0.5-0.9
0.5-0.9
0.02
0.001
1.00)
0.02
0.04
0.04
44
89
20
154
224
36
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.3-0.7
0.5-0.9
0.6-1.9
0.001
0.02
0.37)
134
25
23
280
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5-0.9
0.3-0.8
0.4-1.0
0.02
0.004
0.04
Procedural/investigative
X-ray
Dental X-ray
('Shoe shop' foot X-ray
Social
('llharacteri.stic.s
88
67
Table IV Hodgkin's disease: Case control study. Pooled ages and sexes. Risks associated with
family illnesses.
95%
Lymphoma/leukaemia
in family
Risk
Confidence
aCase
conltrol
raltio
interval
16
3.31
1.54 7.11
0.001
3.72
1.32-10.47
0.006
Lymphoma/leukaemia
in family
(confirmed reports only)
Cancer in I st or
2nd degree relative
(confirmed reports only)
Brcain tumour in 1 st
degree relative
Breast cancer in
Ist degree relative
Lung cancer in I st
degree relative
Multiple sclerosis
32
43
1.61
0.99-2.62
0.06
2.81
0.93-8.54
0.06
13
17
1.15
0.74-3.20
0.25
10
18
0.24
0.50 2.42
0.48
2.59
0.99-6.81
0.06
in family
Table V Hodgkin's disease: Case control study. Risks associated with previous skin conditions.
Femiiales
Mlales
N
Risk
Risk
(c5s
(control
ratio
C(S
c(ontrol
ratio
22
5
2
7
23
21
4
4
4
16
2.2
2.5
0.9
3.0
2.8
0.02
0.16
0.98
0.08
0.003
12
2
2
1
13
16
1.6
0.26
0.4
0.22
19
1.4
0.38
2.3
0.08
2.5
0.10
25
18
3.1
0.(01
15
25
1.2
0.66
eczemna/dermatitis
Urticariab
Psoriasis
Warts
Eczema/dermatitisb
oa
9
1a
eczema/dermatitis
Other treatmcnt for
eczema/dermatitisb
"Insufficient numbers; bMedically confirmed records only and cTreatment confirmed but not all original diagnoses.
89
Table VI Hodgkin's disease: Case control results. Risks associated with past dental anaesthesia.
Males
Any dental
anaesthetic
Dental gas
only vs. never
Dental gas
pre-1960 vs. never
Dental gas
post-1960 vs. never
aMatching ratio
Females
Na
cases
Na
Risk
controls
ratio
Na
cases
Na
controls
Risk
ratio
31
86
3.1
0.003
18
69
0.9
0.94
24
58
3.7
0.001
11
47
0.9
0.76
16
27
5.1
0.001
19
2.7
0.08
1 case: 3-4 controls (see text) and bNo case or control responses.
950
Number
of siblings
of case
N
cases
N
controls
Risk
ratio
Confidence
interval
0 or 1
2
3 or 4
S or more
85
63
57
41
148
112
110
116
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.0
1.1-2.7
0.9-2.6
0.9-2.4
0.02
0.06
0.12
References
BERNARD, S.M., CARTWRIGHT, R.A., BIRD, C.C., RICHARDS,
90