The rense.

com web site had two entries on Tim Vawter's

lawsuit. The first is dated August 5, 2009. Here is the
relevant section from
http://www.rense.com/general87/ss.htm

Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

Preliminary Injunction Filed

To Stop Forced Flu Vaccinations
By Devvy
8-5-9

[large section left out]

My next inquiry was about a lawsuit (injunction) filed here in the U.S. as
indicated above in paragraph one. A Preliminary Injunction was filed in
United States District Court, District of New Jersey on July 31, 2009, by
Tim Vawter, pro se. For those unfamiliar with that term, it simply means
that Mr. Vawter was not represented by an attorney at the time he filed.
That document can be viewed here:

http://www.wakenews.net/html/us-files.html

While the document doesn't show a case number, one has been assigned:
3:2009cv03803.

This filing is now on the docket; see here:

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-njdce/case_no-
3:2009cv03803/case_id-231005/

While I am not an attorney, I do see some potential problems. First, the

only defendant listed is Federal Government. I've never seen that before
in hundreds of cases I have looked at in the federal courts. Federal
Government could potentially mean the million plus federal employees,
Congress, cabinets and our military. I believe that defendants must be
named by name and the agency they work for as relates to the issue raised
in the injunction. The problem Mr. Vawter is going to have is service.
Who is he going to serve as defendant Federal Government?

This preliminary injunction is asking the court to stop the federal

government from forcing any person to take any influenza (flu)
vaccination against a person's will. And, extending the order to include
state officials.

To my knowledge as I write this, there is no order by Congress or any of

its agencies to force these deadly cocktails on any citizen in this country.
The CDC is recommending everyone get shot up, but at this time it is
only a recommendation. I think, and I could be wrong, Mr. Vawter will
have a problem because there was no forced vaccination order in effect at
the time he filed his paperwork.

This case is listed as: Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights.
The court could very well say that since Mr. Vawter has not been ordered
by any agency of the federal government to take an H1N1 flu vaccine, his
civil rights have not been violated.

You can track progress of his case at the link above on dockets.justia.

We do know that there are mandatory vaccinations required by certain

state agencies and the military is routinely shot up. Below is a link to a
paper done by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) back in 2005:

Mandatory Vaccinations: Precedent and Current Laws

http://fas.org/sgp/crs/RS21414.pdf

Also, see:

From: Lowell Becraft, Constitutional Attorney

Vaccination Laws
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/VaccinationLaws.html

Mandatory Vaccination of Healthcare Workers (by state)

http://www.apic.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Healthcare_
Worker_Immunization&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentFil
eID=2644

CDC: National Vaccine Program Office & Immunization Laws

http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/law.htm

While there are so many excellent web sites on this subject, if you would
like to learn more I recommend:

Vaccine Information Center

http://drtenpenny.com/default.aspx

Saying No to Vaccines
http://www.sayingnotovaccines.com/

Disclaimer

Donate to Rense.com Subscribe To RenseRadio!

Enormous Online Archives,
Support Free And Honest
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files,
Journalism At Rense.com
Highest Quality Live Programs

MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros