Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Table of contents
1.1. 3GPP evolution towards mobile broadband Internet......................................2
1.2. IMT-Advanced: the ITU standard for 4G ........................................................9
1.3. LTE/LTE-Advanced standardization (3GPP Rel-8 to 3GPP Release 12) ...15
1.4. Evolved Packet System (EPS), E-UTRAN ...................................................25
1.5. Self Organizing Networks (SON) for LTE/LTE-Advanced ............................32
1.6. LTE/LTE-Advanced Radio Resource Management .....................................37
1.7. Radio network deployment and frequency planning ....................................44
1.8. Spectrum management (ITU WRC 2012) ....................................................48
1.9. Business models and forecasts for LTE/LTE-Advanced ..............................53
References .........................................................................................................57
performance with the use of new advanced techniques both in spectrum that is
already being utilized and also in new spectrum. Specifically:
Large Spectrum Utilization. HSPA+ can now be deployed in wider
bandwidths such as 10Mhz and 20Mhz. This functionality both
increases peak data rates and also improves spectral efficiency.
Advanced MIMO. The introduction of MIMO enhancements and the
addition of more transmit and receive antennas provides improved
spectral efficiency in existing spectrum.
Good Coverage Performance. Soft handover and other techniques
provide improved coverage, especially at the edge of the cell.
As competitive pressures in the mobile broadband market intensify and as
demand for more capacity continues unabated, LTE is developing deployment
momentum for the reason that it offers an extremely efficient and effective way of
delivering high performance, especially in new spectrum. Specifically:
Wider Radio Channels. LTE can be deployed in wide radio channels
(e.g., 10 MHz or 20 MHz). This increases peak data rates and also
provides for more efficient spectrum utilization.
Easiest MIMO Deployment. By using new radios and antennas, LTE
facilitates MIMO deployment compared to the logistical challenges of
adding antennas for MIMO to existing deployments of legacy
technologies. Furthermore, MIMO gains are maximized because all
user equipment supports it from the beginning.
Best Latency Performance. For some mobile broadband
applications, low latency (packet traversal delay) is as important as
high throughput. With a low transmission-time interval (TTI) of 1 msec
and flat architecture (fewer nodes in the core network), LTE has the
lowest latency of any cellular technology.
LTE is available in both FDD and TDD modes. Many deployments will be
based on FDD in paired spectrum. The TDD mode, however, will be important in
enabling deployments where paired spectrum is unavailable. LTE TDD will be
deployed in China, will be available for Europe at 2.6 GHz, and will operate in the
U.S. Broadband Radio Service (BRS) 2.6 GHz band.
To address ITUs IMT-Advanced requirements, 3GPP is developing LTEAdvanced, a technology that will have peak theoretical rates of more than 1
Gbps. See the following two sections for a detailed explanation.
However, LTE is one of the most promising wireless-technology platforms
for the future. The version being deployed today is just the beginning of a series
of innovations that will increase performance, efficiency, and capabilities, as
depicted in Figure 1.1. The enhancements shown in the 2013 to 2016 period are
the ones expected from 3GPP Releases 10 and 11 and are commonly referred to
as LTE-Advanced. Subsequent releases such as Release 12 and 13, however,
will continue this innovation through the end of this decade.
Although later sections (in this module) quantify performance and presents
functional details of the LTE/LTE-Advanced technologies, here we will give a
summary intended to provide a frame of reference for the subsequent discussion
Furthermore, Figure 1.2 shows the evolution of the different wireless and
mobile technologies and their peak network performance capabilities towards
mobile broadband Internet. The development of GSM and UMTS-HSPA happens
in stages referred to as 3GPP releases, and equipment vendors produce
hardware that supports particular versions of each specification. It is important to
realize that the 3GPP releases address multiple technologies. For example,
Release 7 optimized VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) for HSPA, but also
significantly enhanced GSM data functionality with Evolved EDGE. A summary of
the different 3GPP releases is as follows:
Release 99: Completed. First deployable version of UMTS.
Enhancements to GSM data (EDGE). Majority of deployments today are
based on Release 99. Provides support for GSM/EDGE/GPRS/WCDMA
radio-access networks.
Release 4: Completed. Multimedia messaging support. First steps
toward using IP transport in the core network.
Release 5: Completed. HSDPA. First phase of Internet Protocol
Multimedia Subsystem (IMS). Full ability to use IP-based transport
instead of just Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) in the core network.
Release 6: Completed. HSUPA. Enhanced multimedia support through
Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Services (MBMS). Performance
Mobility
New Capabilities
Of Systems Beyond
IMT-2000
High
IMT-2000
Enhanced
IMT-2000
New
Mobile
Access
Enhancement
Low
KEY:
10
100
Peak Useful Data Rate (Mb/s)
1000
denotes interconnection between systems via networks or the like, which allows
flexible use in any environments without making users aware of constituent systems.
Nomadic / Local Area Access Systems
Dark gray color indicates existing capabilities, medium gray color indicates enhancements to IMT-2000,
and the lighter gray color indicates new capabilities of Systems Beyond IMT-2000.
The degree of mobility as used in this figure is described as follows: Low mobility covers pedestrian speed, and high
mobility co vers high speed on highways or fast trains (60 km/h to ~250 km/h, or more).
Figure 1.3. Relationship between IMT-2000 (3G LTE) and IMT-Advanced (4G).
For the last 20 years, ITU has been coordinating efforts of government
and industry and private sector in the development of a global broadband
multimedia international mobile telecommunication system, known as IMT. Since
2000, the world has seen the introduction of the first family of standards derived
from the IMT concept. ITU estimates that worldwide mobile cellular subscribers
are likely to reach the 4 billion mark before the end of this year of which IMT
systems technology will constitute a substantial part considering that already in
2007 (during the ITU World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-07) in
Geneva), there were more than 1 billion IMT-2000 subscribers in the world. It is
realised that by the year 2010 there are 1 700 million terrestrial mobile
subscribers worldwide. And moreover, it is envisaged that, by the year 2020,
potentially the whole population of the world could have access to advanced
mobile communications devices, subject to, amongst other considerations,
favourable cost structures being achieved. There are already more portable
handsets than either fixed line telephones or fixed line equipment such as PCs
that can access the Internet, and the number of mobile devices is expected to
continue to grow more rapidly than fixed line devices. Mobile terminals will be the
most commonly used devices for accessing and exchanging information. User
10
expectations are continually increasing with regard to the variety of services and
applications. In particular, users will expect a dynamic, continuing stream of new
applications, capabilities and services that are ubiquitous and available across a
range of devices using a single subscription and a single identity (number or
address). Versatile communication systems offering customized and ubiquitous
services based on diverse individual needs will require flexibility in the technology
in order to satisfy multiple demands simultaneously.
However, in planning process for the future development of IMTAdvanced, it is important to consider the timelines associated with their
realization, which depend on a number of factors:
standards development;
regulatory considerations;
11
Perspective
Objectives
END USER
CONTENT
PROVIDER
SERVICE
PROVIDER
NETWORK
OPERATOR
12
sites)
Single authentication (independent of the access network)
Flexible billing capabilities
Access type selection optimizing service delivery
MANUFACTURER /
APPLICATION
DEVELOPER
The services that users will want in mobile broadband Internet, and the
rising number of users, will place increasing demands on radio access networks.
These demands arent met by the enhancement of IMT-2000 radio access
systems (in terms of peak bit rate to a user, aggregate throughput, and greater
flexibility to support many different types of service simultaneously). It is therefore
anticipated that there will be a requirement for a new radio access technology, as
IMT-Advanced, or technologies at some point in the future to satisfy the
anticipated demands for user mobility and higher bandwidth services.
Nowadays and further ITU-R Recommendations will develop these
concepts in more detail. Other new Recommendations will address spectrum
requirements for IMT-Advanced systems, which frequency bands might be
suitable, and in what time-frame such spectrum would be needed, with a view to
accommodating emerging broadband services and applications. It is expected
that new spectrum requirements documented in these Recommendations will be
addressed at a future World Radiocommunication Conference.
IMT-Advanced 4G systems will support a wide range of symmetrical,
asymmetrical, and unidirectional services. They will also provide management of
different QoS levels to realize the underlying objective of efficient transport of
packet based services. In parallel, there will be an increased penetration of
nomadic and mobile wireless access multimedia services over Internet.
The technologies, applications and services associated with IMTAdvanced 4G systems could well be radically different from the present,
challenging the perceptions of what may be considered viable by todays
standards and going beyond what can be achieved by the future enhancement of
other radio systems. The new radio access interface(s) are envisaged to handle
a wide range of supported data rates according to economic and service
demands in multi-user broadband environments with target peak data rates of up
to approximately 100 Mbit/s for high mobility such as mobile access and up to
approximately 1 Gbit/s for low mobility such as nomadic/local wireless access.
These data rates are targets for research and investigation. They should not be
taken as the definitive requirements for 4G systems.
Moreover, these data rates will be shared between active users. The
achievable (peak or sustained) throughput for any individual user depends on
many parameters, including the number of active users, traffic characteristics,
13
14
15
16
17
Also, in Table 1.3 the 3GPP LTE highlight specifications are summarized.
Those specifications give an overall view of the performance that 3G LTE (Rel-8)
is offering. It meets the requirements of industry for high data download speeds
as well as reduced latency - a factor important for many applications from VoIP to
gaming and interactive use of data. It also provides significant improvements in
the use of the available spectrum.
18
Details
100 (SISO), 172 (2x2 MIMO), 326 (4x4 MIMO)
With the standards definitions now available for LTE, the Long Term
Evolution of the 3G services, eyes are now turning towards the next
development, that of the truly 4G technology named IMT-Advanced. The new
technology being developed under the auspices of 3GPP to meet these
requirements is often termed LTE-Advanced (LTE Release 10 & beyond).
While 3GPP Rel-9 focuses on enhancements to HSPA+ and LTE the Rel10 focuses on the next generation of LTE for the ITUs IMT-Advanced
requirements and both were developed nearly simultaneously by 3GPP
standards working groups. Several milestones have been achieved by vendors in
recent years for both Rel-9 and Rel-10. Most significant was the final ratification
by the ITU of LTE-Advanced (Rel-10) as 4G IMT-Advanced in November 2010.
HSPA+ was further enhanced in Rel-9 and was demonstrated at 56 Mbps
featuring multi-carrier and MIMO technologies in Beijing at P&T/Wireless &
Networks Comm China in 2009. Vendors anticipate that the steps in progress for
HSPA+ will lead up to 168 Mbps peak theoretical downlink throughput speeds
and more than 20 Mbps uplink speeds in Rel-10 in coming years. At Mobile
World Congress 2010, the worlds first HSPA+ data call with a peak throughput of
112 Mbps was demonstrated by a leading vendor. M2M Identity Modules (MIM)
with Rel-9 M2M Form Factors (MFF) are being shipped around the world for
devices now embarking wireless in vehicles and harsh environments where
humidity and vibration would not allow the traditional 2FF and 3FF to perform to
the requirements. These MFF MIM also include additional software features to
enable the expected life expectancy for such devices.
19
Vendors are already progressing beyond LTE with the next generation of
technologies in Rel-10 for IMT-Advanced, the LTE-Advanced, demonstrating that
the evolution of LTE is secure and future-proof. In October 2009, 3GPP
submitted LTE-Advanced to the ITU as a proposed candidate IMT-Advanced
technology for which specifications could become available in 2011 through Rel10. Milestones have already been achieved in the commercialization of Rel-10
and beyond. As early as December 2008, researchers conducted the worlds first
demonstration of Rel-10 LTE-Advanced technology, breaking new ground with
mobile broadband communications beyond LTE. A leading infrastructure
companys researchers successfully demonstrated Relaying technology
proposed for LTE-Advanced in Germany. The demonstration illustrated how
advances to Relaying technology could further improve the quality and coverage
consistency of a network at the cell edge where users were furthest from the
mobile broadband base station. Relaying technology which can also be
integrated in normal base station platforms is cost-efficient and easy to deploy
as it does not require additional backhaul.
The demonstration of LTE-Advanced indicated how operators could plan
their LTE network investments knowing that the already best-in-class LTE radio
performance, including cell edge data rates, could be further improved and that
the technological development path for the next stage of LTE is secure and
future-proof.
Additionally, performance enhancements were achieved in the
demonstration by combining an LTE system supporting a 2X2 MIMO antenna
system and a Relay station. The Relaying was operated inband, which meant
that the relay stations inserted in the network did not need an external data
backhaul; they were connected to the nearest base stations by using radio
resources within the operating frequency band of the base station itself. The
improved cell coverage and system fairness, which means offering higher user
data rates for and fair treatment of users distant from the base station, will allow
operators to utilize existing LTE network infrastructure and still meet growing
bandwidth demands. The LTE-Advanced demonstration used an intelligent demo
Relay node embedded in a test network forming a FDD in-band self-backhauling
solution for coverage enhancements. With this demonstration, the performance
at the cell edge could be increased up to 50 percent of the peak throughput.
The performance and capabilities of 4G LTE (Rel-10) will be unmatched in
the marketplace, allowing customers to do things never before possible in a
wireless and mobile environment. Although not fixed yet in the specifications,
there are many high level aims for the new LTE Advanced specification. These
will need to be verified and much work remains to be undertaken in the
specifications before these are all fixed. Currently some of the main features that
wireless and mobile implementation of LTE-Advanced will provide are the
following:
Peak data rates: downlink - 1 Gbps; uplink - 500 Mbps.
Spectrum efficiency: 3 times greater than LTE. LTE-Advanced shall
operate in spectrum allocations of different sizes including wider
20
21
These are many of the development aims for LTE Advanced. Their actual
figures and the actual implementation of them will need to be worked out during
the specification stage of the LTE Advanced system (beyond Rel-10).
On the other hand, as it was mention in the section 1.1, Release 11, is not
scheduled to be finished until the very end of 2012. For LTE, emphasis is on Coordinated Multi-Point (CoMP), carrier-aggregation enhancements, and further
enhanced eICIC including devices with interference cancellation. The release
includes further DL and UL MIMO enhancements for LTE. For HSPA, provides 8carrier on the downlink, uplink enhancements to improve latency, dual-antenna
beamforming and MIMO, DLCELL_Forward Access Channel (FACH) state
enhancement for smart phone-type traffic, four-branch MIMO enhancements and
transmissions for HSDPA, 64 QAM in the uplink, downlink multi-point
transmission, and non-contiguous HSDPA carrier aggregation.
Table 1.4. Study items for Rel-11.
22
23
Table 1.6. Benefits from 3GPP Release 12 Expand to new areas and new spectrum.
24
As seen within the above figure, the LTE SAE Evolved Packet Core,
consists of four main elements as listed below:
26
Mobility Management Entity, MME: The MME is the main control node
for the LTE SAE access network, handling a number of features:
Idle mode UE tracking
Bearer activation / de-activation
Choice of SGW for a UE
Intra-LTE handover involving core network node location
Interacting with HSS to authenticate user on attachment and
implements roaming restrictions
It acts as a termination for the Non-Access Stratum (NAS)
Provides temporary identities for UEs
The SAE MME acts the termination point for ciphering protection for
NAS signaling. As part of this it also handles the security key
management. Accordingly the MME is the point at which lawful
interception of signalling may be made.
Paging procedure
The S3 interface terminates in the MME thereby providing the control
plane function for mobility between LTE and 2G/3G access networks.
The SAE MME also terminates the S6a interface for the home HSS for
roaming UEs. It can therefore be seen that the SAE MME provides a
considerable level of overall control functionality.
Serving Gateway, SGW: The Serving Gateway, SGW, is a data plane
element within the LTE SAE. Its main purpose is to manage the user
plane mobility and it also acts as the main border between the Radio
Access Network, RAN and the core network. The SGW also maintains the
data paths between the eNodeBs and the PDN Gateways. In this way the
SGW forms a interface for the data packet network at the E-UTRAN.
Also when UEs move across areas served by different eNodeBs, the
SGW serves as a mobility anchor ensuring that the data path is
maintained.
PDN Gateway, PGW: The LTE SAE PDN gateway provides connectivity
for the UE to external packet data networks, fulfilling the function of entry
and exit point for UE data. The UE may have connectivity with more than
one PGW for accessing multiple PDNs.
Policy and Charging Rules Function, PCRF: This is the generic name
for the entity within the LTE SAE EPC which detects the service flow,
enforces charging policy. For applications that require dynamic policy or
charging control, a network element entitled the Applications Function, AF
is used.
In order that requirements for increased data capacity and reduced
latency can be met, along with the move to an all-IP network, it is necessary to
adopt a new approach to the network structure. For 3G UMTS / WCDMA the
UTRAN (UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network, comprising the Node B's or
basestations and Radio Network Controllers) employed low levels of autonomy.
The Node Bs were connected in a star formation to the Radio Network
Controllers (RNCs) which carried out the majority of the management of the radio
27
resource. In turn the RNCs connected to the core network and connect in turn to
the Core Network.
To provide the required functionality within LTE SAE, the basic system
architecture sees the removal of a layer of management. The RNC is removed
and the radio resource management is devolved to the base-stations. The new
style base-stations are called eNodeBs or eNBs.
The eNBs are connected directly to the core network gateway via a newly
defined "S1 interface". In addition to this the new eNBs also connect to adjacent
eNBs in a mesh via an "X2 interface". This provides a much greater level of
direct interconnectivity. It also enables many calls to be routed very directly as a
large number of calls and connections are to other mobiles in the same or
adjacent cells. The new structure allows many calls to be routed far more directly
and with only minimum interaction with the core network.
Moreover, from a user-plane perspective there are only the eNBs and the
gateways, which is why the system is considered flat. The result is a reduced
complexity compared to previous architectures.
28
coverage, higher data rates, and better QoS performance and fairness for
different users. In addition to the new Layer 1 and Layer 2 functionality, eNBs
handle several other functions. This includes the radio resource control including
admission control, load balancing and radio mobility control including handover
decisions for the mobile or user equipment (UE). The additional levels of
flexibility and functionality given to the new eNBs mean that they are more
complex than the UMTS and previous generations of base-station. However the
new 3G LTE SAE network structure enables far higher levels of performance. In
addition to this their flexibility enables them to be updated to handle new
upgrades to the system including the transition from 3G LTE to 4G LTEAdvanced.
Moreover, The EPC specifies two types of IP-IP Gateway logical functions
for the user plane the Serving Gateway (S-GW) and the PDN Gateway (PGW). The S-GW and P-GW are core network functions of the E-UTRAN based
access. They may be implemented in one physical node or in separate physical
nodes. Early deployments are likely to see a single node implementation of SGW and P-GW functions with future proof design to decouple these functions
such that S-GWs in visited networks can connect to P-GWs of home networks for
home PLMN routed IP services.
Figure. 1.12. SAE Gateway (S-GW) and PDN Gateway (P-GW) Architecture.
29
As shown in Figure 1.12, both the S-GW and P-GW are built on core
datacom routing and switching technologies supporting the Layer 2 and Layer 3
suite of an All IP Network. Therefore, it is anticipated that the S-GW and P-GW
are logical migration and evolution paths for the traditional IP-IP Gateway product
lines. Each IP-IP Gateway vendor will have their own hardware and platform
USP that supports line-rate switching and packet forwarding with very low latency
of high volume IP traffic. There exists a striking similarity between the S-GW and
P-GW functions. Other than the commonality at the core datacom layer, they
both act as the Policy Enforcement Points (PEP) for dynamic QoS policies. While
the S-GW is dedicated to policy and QoS enforcement at packet level, the P-GW
functions as the PEP at the service level. On the charging front, both the S-GW
and P-GW have a role to play. While the S-GW is involved in generating charging
records at packet level, the P-GW takes up the responsibility for producing
charging records at service level. Deep Packet Inspection and Legal Intercept
are dedicated functions of the P-GW, but nothing prevents the S-GW from
implementing these functions as well. Given that the S-GW is the direct interface
point for E-UTRAN eNodeB (S1-U interface), functions such as inter-E-UTRAN
mobility anchoring for the user plane (coordinating with the MME) and eNodeB
packet reordering are exclusively meant for S-GW implementation. Since the SGW directly interfaces with the GERAN and UTRAN networks (S4 and S12
interfaces), it also acts as the anchor point for inter-3GPP RAT mobility.
The P-GW on the other hand is primarily responsible for the IP address
allocation of the UE in the AIPN and acts as the anchor point for mobility across
the non-3GPP IP-CANs (for both trusted and non-trusted). For network based
mobility, the P-GW acts as the Gateway Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) terminating
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) for the control signaling and IPv4/IPv6 tunneling for
the user plane. This corresponds to the S2a and S2b interfaces for the trusted
and non-trusted non-3GPP IP-CAN respectively, where the non-3GPP IP-CANs
directly terminate into the P-GW, bypassing the S-GW (as in the case of the non
roaming architecture for EPS or home routed architecture or the case of local
breakout within the visited PLMN). The trusted or non-trusted non-3GPP IP-CAN
typically emulates the MAG function of the network based mobility architecture.
For deployment architectures where the S-GW is in the path of the chained home
routed solution, the S-GW additionally plays the role of a back-to-back Gateway
LMA and MAG function. In such scenarios, the S2a and S2b interfaces from the
trusted and non-trusted non-3GPP IP-CAN respectively, are routed to the P-GW
via the S-GW.
There are two deployment models to address host-based mobility. In the
first deployment model, the S2a and S2b interfaces are based on MIPv4
technology. The P-GW acts as a MIPv4 Home Agent and the trusted and nontrusted non-3GPP IP-CAN provide the Foreign Agent function for the Mobile
Node (the UE). The user plane is based on the tunneling of end-to-end IPv4 over
transport IPv4. The second deployment model assumes that the UE is capable of
acting as a DSMIPv6 client and the P-GW is the DSMIPv6 Home Agent. All other
nodes in the network are IP Access router systems. This deployment model
30
applies to both 3GPP and non-3GPP IP-CANs (the S2c interface between the
UE and the P-GW). The formal interface between the S-GW and the P-GW is
called S5 (where S-GW and P-GW are within the same PLMN) and S8 (where SGW belongs to visited PLMN and the P-GW to the home PLMN). The S5 and S8
interfaces are otherwise functionally similar. There are two protocol options for
these interfaces. The first option is to support GTP tunnels between S-GW and
P-GW, GTP-C for control signaling and IP tunneling over GTP-U for the user
plane. This typically applies to 3GPP access deployments, where the S-GW acts
as a GTP-U relay between the 3GPP access network and the P-GW. If the UE
over the 3GPP access network supports DSMIPv6, then it is possible to run the
S2c interface over GTP over the P-GW and S-GW connection.
The second deployment model allows PMIPv6 to run as the control
signaling protocol on the S5 and S8 interfaces. For 3GPP access, this implies
that the S-GW terminates the GTP-U tunnels and tunnels user IP over transport
IP towards P-GW. Initial deployments will possibly start with non-roaming
architectures, with the S-GW and P-GW interface being initially S5 focused.
Additionally, equipment vendors will be looking into collapsed S-GW and P-GW
functions within a single physical node. Hence, vendors are likely to start
implementing the S5 interface as proprietary lightweight implementations.
However, the interface design must be future proof to make a way for the more
formal S5 interface and to evolve to the S8 interface for decoupled S-GW and PGW solutions, as operators start insisting on roaming architectures and home
PLMN routed IP services.
Both the S-GW and P-GW will have Diameter interfaces towards network
hosted Policy and Charging Rules Functions (PCRFs) and Service-based Policy
Decision Functions (SPDFs)/Radio Access Control Functions (RACFs). The
Diameter based Gxc and S7 interfaces control the Policy and Charging
Enforcement Function (PCEF) within the S-GW and P-GW functions. It is also
likely that the operator network may not have a centralized Policy Decision Point
in this case the S-GW and P-GW must be in a position to accept dynamic
policy and QoS decisions from distributed PDPs in the network after
implementing a local PDP within the Gateway for resolving policy conflicts. The
Gateways must also realize the Diameter interfaces (S6b and S6c) towards
external AAA functions for non-3GPP accesses.
As a conclusion we can clearly say that the new SAE/EPC architecture
together with E-UTRAN for LTE/LTE-Advanced provides a new approach for the
core and access networks, enabling far higher levels of data to be transported to
enable it to support the much higher data rates that will be possible with those
3GPP technologies. In addition to this, other features that enable the CAPEX and
OPEX to be reduced when compared to existing systems, thereby enabling
higher levels of efficiency to be achieved.
31
32
and connecting to the OSS, as well as linking up and swapping parameters with
need-to-know neighbours. More precisely said, the self-configuration process
is defined as the process where newly deployed nodes (eNBs) are configured by
automatic installation procedures to get the necessary basic configuration for
system operation. Self-configuration process works in preoperational state, which
starts from when the eNB is powered up and has backbone connectivity until the
RF transmitter is switched on.
As shown in Figure 1.14 (where the SON framework is shown), selfconfiguration includes two stages: basic setup and initial radio configuration. The
whole procedure is shown in Figure 1.15:
1. An IP address is allocated to the new eNB and the information of the
Selfconfiguration Subsystem of OAM (Operation and Management) is given to
the eNB.
2. A GW is configured for the new eNB so that the eNB can exchange IP
packets with other internet nodes.
3. The new eNB provides its information, including type, hardware and
etc., to the Self-configuration Subsystem for authentication. Necessary software
and configuration data are downloaded from the Self-configuration Subsystem.
4. The new eNB is configured based on the transport and radio
configuration data.
5.The new eNB connects to the normal OAM subsystems for other
management functions.
6. S1 and necessary X2 interfaces are established.
33
34
35
36
transmits the same amount of data in both directions. However, for internet
connections or broadcast data (for example, streaming video), it is likely that
more data will be sent from the server to the UE (the down-ink).
Based on the current and future traffic demands in cellular networks the
required bandwidth in up-link will be narrower than that in down-link. So
asymmetric transmission bandwidth will be a better solution for efficient utilization
of the bandwidth (see Figure 1.19).
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
There are various options how these Physical Resource Blocks can be
allocated, as well as implemented for FFR, PFR and SFR. Fractional and partial
frequency reuse schemes are both fundamentally based on allocating a number
of these PRBs in a sector. The main issue with these is that they limit the
maximum throughput available to a user - since they are not able to allocate the
full bandwidth.
In comparison, the concept of Soft Frequency Reuse enables the system
to maximize the capacity of the network by enabling each sector to utilize the full
bandwidth. To do this, SFR adjusts the power allocated to certain PRBs in order
to mitigate ICI (Inter Cell Interference). It also enables the eNB to allocate the full
bandwidth (all PRBs at a lower power) to users close to the cell, thereby
achieving higher peak rates. This process is shown in Figure 1.25.
46
via the X2 interface (eNB to eNB), to pass overload and high interference
information. This in turn may be used by the eNB to dynamically adjust the
number and power of PRBs allocated in a cell. In the following figure 1.26 the
above techniques are illustrated.
The final phase of the Radio Frequency planning and deployment process
involves continuous optimisation of the Radio Frequent plan to accommodate for
changes in the environment or additional service requirements (e.g. additional
coverage or capacity). This phase starts from initial network deployment and
involves collecting measurement data on a regular basis that could be via drive
testing or centralised collection. The data is then used to plan new sites or to
optimize the parameter settings (e.g. antenna orientation, downtilting, frequency
plan) of existing sites.
47
It might be thought that new technologies such as small cells and smart
antennas would obviate the need for spectrum. These technologies, however,
are already on the roadmap for 3GPP evolution and, by themselves, do not
sufficiently increase capacity to meet growing demand.
ITU World Radiocommunication Conferences (WRC), held every three
or four years, are mandated to review and revise the Radio Regulations, the
international treaty governing the use of radio-frequency spectrum (spectrum
management) and satellite orbit resources. The agenda of a world radiocommunication conference may include any other question of a worldwide
character within the competence of the conference.
The WRC for 2012 took place in Geneva, Switzerland, from 23 January up
to 17 February 2012, and was triggering event for the radio communication world
and the frequency management sphere. The unprecedented number of
proposals (more than 1700) addressing the various items on the WRC-12
agenda cover almost all radio services and applications, and illustrated the
importance of this conference to governments and businesses.
The scope and complexity of the WRC-12 agenda make it impossible to
consider all the items in a section as brief as this. And in summarizing the main
topics to be dealt with by the conference, the specific concerns and interests of
some groups or entities will inevitably be neglected. With those caveats in mind,
here shortly we can summarize WRC-12 (for more details see the references),
and we can say that it focus on:
the review and possible revision of the international regulatory framework for
radiocommunications, in order to reflect in the Radio Regulations the
increasing convergence of radio services arising from the rapid evolution of
information and communication technologies (ICT), and to adapt to new and
potentially disruptive technologies such as software-defined and cognitive radio
systems or short-range devices;
48
49
50
and a satellite component (radio links between satellite and unmanned aircraft
control station, and between satellite and unmanned aircraft).
Moreover, the main topic to be discussed under the terrestrial component
is possible new allocations to the aeronautical mobile (route) service in all or
some portions of the bands 5 0005 150 MHz and 15.415.5 GHz. The main
topics relating to the satellite component are, first, the use of communication links
within existing allocations to the aeronautical mobile-satellite (route) service, and
second, the use of existing fixed-satellite service, mobile-satellite service and
aeronautical mobile-satellite service allocations for communication links between
the unmanned aircraft and satellite, and between the unmanned aircraft control
station and satellite. There is a general understanding of the pressing need for
allocations for unmanned aircraft systems, particularly for the terrestrial
component, and the discussion may well centre on the exact band and amount of
spectrum. Concerning maritime safety, WRC-12 is expected to adopt special
measures to enhance maritime safety systems for ships and ports.
Enhancements are proposed in three main areas to:
provide satellite detection of signals from automatic identification systems on
board ships (by adopting a new allocation to the mobile-satellite service around
156 MHz for satellite detection of automatic identification system signals, to
provide global ship-tracking and enhance search and rescue);
improve the broadcasting of safety and security information for ships and ports
(by making a worldwide allocation to the maritime mobile service in the 495505
kHz band as well as a regional allocation in 510525 kHz band in Region 2
which would enhance transmission of safety and security information in ports and
coastal waters);
improve VHF communications for port operations and ship movement (it is
planned to revise Appendix 18 of the Radio Regulations in order to implement
new digital technologies in the band 156174 MHz and increase the number of
simplex channels to make more channels available for the ports with heavy traffic
where communications are congested).
Given the existing situation, the global maritime community has agreed on
special measures to enhance maritime safety systems for ships and ports,
recognizing that additional satellite channels may be required to enhance and
accommodate global ship tracking capabilities. Everyone is keen to agree on the
proposed methods and options.
On the other side, several WRC-12 agenda items are related to important
environmental topics, in particular the use of ICT in combating climate change
and mitigating its effects, and in predicting natural disasters and facilitating relief
efforts. Since the 1970s, interest in and use of oceanographic radar operating in
the 3 to 50 MHz range has increased significantly. Preparatory work has
identified potential spectrum allocations in terms of both compatibility with other
users and effectiveness of ocean measurements. The need for additional data to
mitigate the effects of disasters, including tsunamis, to understand climate
change, and to ensure safe maritime travel has led to the consideration of the
operational use of oceanographic radar networks on a global basis. Increased
reliance on the data from these systems for maritime safety and disaster
response, as well as for oceanographic, climatological and meteorological
51
operations, has driven the need to improve the regulatory status of the spectrum
used by oceanographic radars while taking into account the protection of existing
allocated services. The ITU membership seems to fully support making
allocations for this application.
Long-range lightning detection using observations near 10 kHz has been
performed since 1939, originally with a labour-intensive system for measuring the
direction from which signals were received. Since 1987, there has been an
automated system to derive strike locations: a distributed network of groundbased sensors can locate the origin of the lightning strike, using the time
differences between the arrival of the lightning emission at the individual sensor
sites. The maximum spectral emissions from lightning strikes are between 9 and
20 kHz. At these frequencies, the sky waves reflected off the ionosphere
propagate for long distances with relatively little attenuation. It is thus possible to
receive the emissions from a lightning strike at thousands of kilometres from the
strike location. The conference will consider the possibility of an allocation in the
frequency range below 20 kHz for passive systems for lightning detection in the
meteorological aids service. Operational non-geostationary meteorological
satellite (MetSat) systems now use the band 7 7507 850 MHz to gather
instrument data to dedicated earth stations with a bandwidth of up to 63 MHz.
The measurements and observations performed by the MetSat systems provide
the data used in operational meteorology, climate monitoring and detection of
global climatic changes. The data have significantly improved operational
meteorology, in particular with respect to numerical weather prediction. The next
generation of non-geostationary MetSat systems will have to provide continuity of
data, aligned to the measurements and observations performed by the current
systems. These future systems will also perform additional and higher-resolution
measurements and observations of meteorological and climate parameters,
requiring much higher data rates and bandwidth as compared to current systems.
The necessary bandwidth for future non-geostationary MetSat systems to fulfil
those requirements would be up to 150 MHz. The conference is expected to
support the corresponding extension of bandwidth.
Finally, the WRC-12 conference considers the need for regulatory action
to foster the development of advanced wireless systems and applications, such
as software-defined radio, cognitive radio systems, short-range devices, fixed
wireless systems above 71 GHz, gateway links for high-altitude platform stations,
and electronic news gathering. The Radio Regulations, in their current form, are
generally considered to provide an appropriate framework for the development of
these systems and applications. Specific requirements can be addressed through
the standardization work of the ITUR study groups.
Previous WRCs have successfully provided for timely enhancements to
the Radio Regulations to cope with technical and regulatory developments, and
to address the needs of the ITU membership for the allocation, management and
use of the radio-frequency spectrum and orbit resources. In keeping with the
tradition of goodwill and international cooperation which has always prevailed
under these circumstances, the WRC-12 undoubtedly is another successful
milestone in the history of the ITU.
52
53
54
before, 19% would watch on-line TV or streaming movies, and 16% were using
Internet more often as a result of subscribing to LTE.
All this shows that users are demanding better mobile broadband
experience whenever conditions allow. Once they have the improved experience,
it is hard to turn back to the lower-rate service. As one old saying goes, It is hard
to become frugal after being accustomed to luxury. The emergence of cloud
computing is further boosting the prosperous development of Internet data
services.
Moreover, from voice only mobile phones to multimedia phones and
iPhone and Android terminals, mobiles have tended to develop into mobile
broadband Internet platforms (see figure 1.28). This is also the developmental
trend of computers. Terminals are evolving into Internet service platforms where
all processing is completed via service plug-ins to the cloud and using a
background high-speed mobile data network.
Figure 1.28. Computers and mobile devices evolving towards mobile broadband internet
platforms.
55
56
References
[1] Mobile Broadband Explosion, Rysavy Research/4G Americas, August 2012
[2] Rysavy Research/4G Americas , 4G Mobile Broadband Evolution: 3GPP
Release 10 and Beyond, HSPA+, SAE/LTE and LTE-Advanced, February 2011.
[3] Mobile Broadband: The Global Evolution of UMTS/HSPA, 3GPP Release 7
and Beyond, December 14, 2006.
[4] 3GPP LTE : http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/cellulartelecomms/lte-longterm-evolution/3g-lte-basics.php
[5] 3 GPP LTE-Advanced: http://www.radioelectronics.com/info/cellulartelecomms/lte-long-term-evolution/3gpp-4g-imt-lteadvanced-tutorial.php
[6] http://www.3gpp.org/
[7] http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Information/WORK_PLAN/Description_Releases/
[8] ITU-R M.2134, Requirements related to technical performance for IMTAdvanced radio interface(s)
[9] ITU Paves the Way for Next-Generation 4G Mobile Broadband Technologies,
ITU, 21 October 2010.
[10] 3GPP TR 23.882: 3GPP system architecture evolution, report on technical
options and conclusions.
[11] ETSI: Long term evolution of the 3GPP radio technology and System
architecture evolution.
[12] Sayan Kumar Ray, Fourth Generation (4G) Networks: Roadmap- Migration
to the Future, IETE Technical Review Vol 23, No 4, pp 253-265, July-August
2006.
[13] Savo G Glisic, Advanced Wireless Networks: 4G Technology, John Wiley &
Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ,
England, 2006.
[14] Sujuan Feng and Eiko Seidel, Self-Organizing Networks (SON) in 3GPP
Long Term Evolution, Nomor Research GmbH, Munich, Germany, May 2008.
[15] Self-Organizing Network (SON): Introducing the Nokia Siemens Networks
SON Suite an efficient, future-proof platform for SON, Nokia Siemens
Networks, 2009.
[16] Modar Safir Shbat and Vyacheslav Tuzlukov, Combined Radio Resource
Management for 3GPP LTE Networks, Advances in Mathematical and
Computational Methods, ISSN: 2160-0643 Volume 1, Number 1, September,
2011.
[17] Gunther Auer, Thierry Clessienne, Nikolaos Doulamis, David MartnSacristn, Jose F. Monserrat, Arif Otyakmaz, Nikolaos Papaoulakis, Simone
57
Redana, Roberto Rossi, Andreas Saul, Rainer Schoenen, Pawel Sroka, D1.1
Initial Report on Advanced Radio Resource Management, CELTIC / CP5-026,
January 2009.
[18] LTE-Advanced: Future of Mobile Broadband, Tata Consultancy Services
Limited, 2009.
[19] LTE planning principles Part II - Soft Frequency Reuse, mpirical, Telecoms
Training, September 2009.
[20] International Telecommunication Union, 2012 World Radiocommunication
Conference Agenda and References (Resolutions and Recommendations),
2010,https://itunews.itu.int/En/2061-World-Radiocommunication-Conference2012.note.aspx
[21]http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/index.asp?category=conferences&rlink=wrc12&lang=en&general-information=1
[22]http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/endata/magazine/ztetechnologies/2011/no1/articles/
201101/t20110117_201776.html
58