Você está na página 1de 13

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect
Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

International Economic Conference of Sibiu 2013 Post Crisis Economy: Challenges and
Opportunities, IECS 2013

The Assessment of Perceived Service Quality of Public Health Care


Services in Romania Using the SERVQUAL Scale
Victor Lorin

*, Iuliana Raluca Gheorghea,

Petrescub

a
Department of Marketing and Medical Technology,
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
b
National School of Political Studies and Public Administration,
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

Abstract
The objective of this paper is to explore the application of the original SERVQUAL scale in the context of public health care
services in Romania. More specifically, we implemented the SERVQUAL scale in order to uncover whether it fits as the original
version or adjustments should be done and to define the demographic profiles of health care consumers who use public services
in Romania.
We have selected our sample respondents from a list of a gynaecological health care forum members, namely women from
Bucharest who should have posted messages on the chosen forum no more than three months before the study was conducted and
the messages should have comprised their experiences with certain physicians. The internal consistency, validity and reliability
measured as the difference between perceptions and expectations known as the gap.
Results indicated that the biggest gap score was registered by the tangibles dimension followed by responsiveness dimension and
reliability dimension.
2013
2013 The
The Authors.
Authors. Published
Publishedby
byElsevier
ElsevierB.V.
B.V.Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.

Selection and
and peer-review
peer-review under
underresponsibility
responsibilityofofFaculty
FacultyofofEconomic
EconomicSciences,
Sciences,Lucian
LucianBlaga
BlagaUniversity
University
Sibiu.
Selection
ofof
Sibiu.
Keywords: health care services; service quality; SERVQUAL; Romania; public health care services.

* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: victor.purcarea@gmail.com

2212-5671 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of Faculty of Economic Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu.
doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00175-5

574

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

1. Introduction
Nowadays, increased competition has influenced both private and public service-oriented organizations
everywhere but mostly in developing countries. Therefore, in order to survive organizations have to deliver services
service quality has
that satisfy consumers
increasingly been considered the key factor in differentiating services which also brings competitive advantages
such as improved customer retention, positive word-of-mouth, reduced level of staff migration, decreased costs in
attracting new consumers, increased profitability and financial performance, increased customer satisfaction and
enlarged market shares (Cronin et al, 2000; Janda et al, 2002; Gounaris et al, 2003; Yoon and Suh 2004). Hence, the
concept of service quality has caught the attention of many researchers in the Marketing sector. Knowing how to
s,
enhances efficiency as well (Mei et al, 1999).
1.1. Perceived Service Quality

perceptions regarding a certain service (Parasuraman et al, 1985). Expectations are reflected in the desires of the
consumers which they believe a service provider should offer. Once formed expectations will help the consumer
make a comparison between what he/she anticipated and what he/she actually received (Lovelock and Wright, 2002;
as a combination between what is delivered and how is delivered (Lim and Tang, 2000; Lovelock and Wright, 2002;
Zeithaml et al, 1993).

Zeithaml et al, 1990). Considering the importance of service quality, there is no surprise that many specialists have
spent a lot of time understanding and researching the underlying dimensions of the concept (Parasuraman et al,
1985; Parasuraman et al, 1988) and it als
outcomes of an organization. As consequence, during the 1980s the research in service quality increased and led to
different theoretical perspectives due to the fact that service quality is almost impossible to measure, the challenge
for experts lied in managing appearances and perceptions (Harvey, 1998).
In order to uncover the meaning of service quality, many specialists concluded that it is a two dimensional
variable (e.g. Lehtinen and Lehtinen, 1982; Gronroos, 1983; Berry, 1983). For instance, Lehtinen and Lehtinen
(1982) have defined service quality using terms such as corporate quality, interactive quality and physical quality
whereas Gronroos (1983) described service quality as a technical quality, namely what is delivered, and as well as, a
functional quality, that is, how the service is delivered.
outcome quality
(1982) as shown in figure 1.

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

Dimension of
Quality

What is
provided

How is
provided

Lehtinen and
Lehtinen (1982)

Gronroos
(1983)

Berry
(1983)

Physical
Quality

Technical
Quality

Outcome
Quality

Interactive
Quality

Functional
Quality

Process
Quality

Corporate
Quality

PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITY


Fig. 1: Summary of the major theoretical perceptions on perceived service quality
Source: adapted from Warbridge, S.W.; Delene, L.M. (1993) Measuring Physician Attitudes of Service Quality, Journal of Health Care
Marketing, 13(1), p. 176

Some researchers assumed that service quality should be measured as a unidimensional variable by different
stakeholders (e.g. Schneider and White, 2004) but still others (e.g. Zeithaml et al, 2009) believed that service quality
should be assessed as a two-dimensional construct.
Soon, SERVQUAL scale became to be the most widely used, validated and generally accepted service quality
measurement in the services literature (Ladhari, 2009). Parasuraman et al (1988) made an exploratory research using
12 consumer focus-groups from four sectors, more specifically, banking, credit card, securities brokerage, product
repair and maintenance. The themes discussed during the focus-groups concentrated on the significance of service
quality, what are the characteristics of services and what are the criteria used to evaluate service quality. They
reached the conclusion that service quality is defined by five dimensions as follows:
Tangibles which encompass physical facilities, equipment and appearance of personnel;
Reliability reflects the ability of the provider to perform the service which was promised as accurately as
possible;
Responsiveness
service;
Assurance
trust and confidence;
Empathy
to consumers.
In fact, the representation of how consumers evaluate the service quality in their minds is assessed by applying
the SERVQUAL scale. SERVQUAL (Parasuraman et al, 1988) is a multi-item instrument that consists of the above
mentioned five dimensions, characterized by 22 paired items. The SERVQUAL scale measures the expectationperception gap (Parasuraman et al, 1988; Parasuraman, 1998). Moreover, half of the items are elaborated in such a
perceptions (Babakus and Mangold, 1992). Consequently, the gap will be the result of the differences between
perception and expectation scores (Babakus and Mangold, 1992; Parasuraman et al, 1991). A positive gap score

575

576

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

suggests that expectations have been met or are exceeded while a negative gap score indicates a failure. Gap scores
are usually analyzed as aggregated scores giving an overview for each dimension. However, gap scores can be
calculated for each individual statement. To conclude, the five dimensions and their implicit gap scores are meant to
signal the strengths and weaknesses embedded in the values of the scores so that managers can take adequate
measures in due time and prevent undesired outcomes.
Even if SERVQUAL has been widely spread and has been considered a reliable and valid instrument to measure
service quality, it has been criticized at both methodological and conceptual levels. One of the criticisms brought to
light was that the five dimensions can be, in fact, restrained to two dimensions, namely, core services and
augmented services (McDougall and Leveresque, 1994) that might be considered the equivalents of technical and
functional dimensions (Gronroos, 1983). Another criticism brought in the attention of experts is that SERVQUAL
cannot be universally applied in all service industries and it was suggested that when being implemented,
researchers should take into account the type of the service market (Carman, 1990). Other criticism focused on the
fact that the scale uses the expectations of the consumers as a base for comparison (Cronin and Taylor, 1992),
meaning the service delivery process, neglecting the technical aspects of the service encounter. Some researchers
even proposed another scale, SERVPREF, which is based on the original SERVQUAL but its reliability and
predictability proved to be more accurate for the service quality (Cronin and Taylor, 1992). Despite the fact that it is
still criticized, SERVQUAL measurement stands as the most popular scale used to assess service quality on
-Fowdar,
co
2005).
Some services, such as health care services, which are high in credence qualities have a wide interpretative
margin meaning that consumers have the tendency to assess the quality based on their perceptions and reality; the
complexity of the service delivery, the discomfort, the desired results and the time elapses until the results are seen.
1.2. Perceived Quality in Health Care Services
Health care services are important to all societies that revolve around patients. Health care services are interesting
by nature because they are services that most individuals do not want but need at a certain point in time (Berry and
Beudapudi, 2007). Moreover, health care services are required to meet the physical, psychological and social needs
of people who seek care.
Nowadays, many health care organizations begin to recognize that quality should be assessed for survival.
Factors such as new incentive structures, declining reimbursement and increasing competition have placed a
pressure on health care organizations to deliver health care efficiently and effectively. On the other hand, health care
managers hope to decrease operating costs, expand access and improve service quality. In other words, if the health
care organization cannot offer a threshold level of quality then patients will utilize it for minor ailments or see it as a
last resort besides other forms of treatments (Andaleeb, 2001).
Therefore, quality in health care services is at the forefront of professional and managerial attention because it is
considered as the means to achieve competitive advantage and long-term profitability (Brown and Swartz, 1989) as
well as achieve the suitable health outcomes for consumers (Dagger and Sweeney, 2006).
Service quality measurements have been applied in different areas of health care in order to
perceptions regarding patient satisfaction (e.g. Bowers et al, 1994), AIDS service agencies (e.g. Fusilier and
Simpson, 1995), physicians (e.g. Brown and Swartz, 1989; Walbridge and Delene, 1993), nurses (e.g. Uzun, 2001)
and hospitals (e.g. Babakus and Mangold, 1992; Lim and Tang, 2000).
The service quality in health care was assumed to be made up of two basic dimensions such as the technical
technical or clinical quality in
health care services
specifications (Lam, 1997). Technical quality also reflects the competence of the professionals, the skills of the
doctors, and the labo
quality has the highest priority, most patients have an inability to evaluate what was provided to them because they
lack the expertise. Therefore, researchers resorted to measure technical quality by proxy, helping patients make a
The functional quality refers to the

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

manner in which health care services were delivered to consumers. Due to the intangibility nature of the services,
consumers will look for tangible physical evidence such as equipment, appearance of employees, environmental
design, dcor signage, to form their expectations (Sureshchander et al, 2002). The functional aspect of the health
care process not only encompasses the environmental surroundings but also the empathic quality of the practitioner
skills reflected in sharing information, explanations, finding solutions, impairing information (Lam, 1997; Heskett et
al, 1997).
Service quality measurement in health care developed in time based on the framework of SERVQUAL. Despite
all controversies regarding the validity and reliability of SERVQUAL, with or without modifications, proved to be a
successful background in health care as well. As consequence, the extended or shortened versions of SERVQUAL
dimensions vary from researcher to researcher. For instance, Lim and
initial SERVQUAL scale to 18 dimensions and Reindenbach and Sandifer-Smallwood (1990) extended the five
dimensions already existed in SERVQUAL to seven dimensions. Other researchers thought of regrouping the initial
SERVQUAL dimensions into other dimensions. For example, Tomes and Ng (1995) grouped under the empathy

nclude dimensions such as

These mixed results indicate that health care service quality is far from being solved and will still be a subject of
great debate. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to measure the service quality in Romanian public health care
units using the initial SERVQUAL. In other words, we want to uncover if the SERVQUAL scale can successfully
be applied in health care services in Romania, determine the dimensions which register the highest gap scores as
well as define the demographic profiles of the Romanian health care consumers of public services.
2. Material and Methods
After the development of the SERVQUAL scale, many specialists conducted various studies to prove its
employment and usefulness in the health care sector, either in its 22 item format or in modified versions in hospitals,
clinics or medical center environments in different countries (e.g. Lam, 1997; Mangold and Babakus, 1991; Lim and
Tang, 2000).
Most studies used the self-administered questionnaire choosing their sample respondents from lists with patients
regardless their health issues or their geographic distributions but still some of the studies were conducted either in
private or public health units or both.
In order to determine our sample of participants we wanted to select the list of patients from a health care forum.
We assumed that health care forums offer more confidentiality and anonymity rather than hospital health care

In Romania, there is a vast palette of health care forums that cover a wide range of health care topics
which focus on treatments, physicians, debates on adjacent health issues and illnesses. To narrow down
the health care field, we decided to select a gynecological forum which covers exclusively topics for
(Looker and
Stichler, 2001) and only these forums follow the characteristics suggested by Kozinets (2010).
Due to the fact that our selected forum covered too many threads, we decided to focus only on the members who
posted messages about health care experiences with a physician. So, the sample was made out of women who were
members of the selected online forum, but since the database was big, further, we applied the following criteria to
filter them:
Members should have posted online messages no more than three months before the study;
Members should have posted messages about their experiences with physicians in public health care
units;
Members should have been from Bucharest.

577

578

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

The sample size was determined following the guidelines of Catoiu et al (2002). So, we concluded that a sample
size of 1000 persons will be enough to give us a clear insight of the researched problem. We have sent invitations to
take part in the study to 1000 women on their e-mail addresses. From 1000 women, 407 agreed to participate.
After applying the criteria mentioned above, from 407 women, 263 were suitable as respondents to be included in
our sample. Consequently, we have sent the 263 selected women, e-mails on their addresses with instructions about
the confidentiality agreements, their remuneration with 35 RON and the methodology employed in filling the
research questionnaire. Finally, from 263 respondents, we received 208 completed questionnaires (a response rate of
approx. 70%) but we validated 183 responses.

The instrument employed to collect data was the selff administered questionnaire as it was applied on
several occasions by other researchers following the initial SERVQUAL guidelines (Parasuraman et al,
1985). The questionnaire comprised of two parts: on one hand, the first part collected demographic
information about the respondents and on the other hand, the second part, contained 22 pairs of Likerttype statements found in the original SERVQUAL scale. Each item appeared twice because one part
measured the expectations and one measured the perceptions of respondents regarding a health care
service offered by a physician in a public health care unit, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from
while the SERVQUAL scale was checked using the factor analysis.
We used SPSS version 13 and Microsoft Excel for the data collection and for statistical analysis.
3. Findings
3.1. Demographic profiles of the respondents
From 183 participants, more than half (52.57%) had ages between 25-34 and had university degrees (82.63%).
Some of the women were married (
income levels varied from 1100-1500 RON (38.42%) to 1600-1800 RON (21.81%), having technical jobs (30.09%)
and managerial jobs (28.38%) as illustrated in figure 2 and figure 3. Most of the respondents had a good health
status (89.63%) at the moment of filling in the questionnaire and they went for a health consultation for routine
check-ups (73.25%) and for analysis (18.25%). Some women have known their physicians from family and friends
(23.63%) and from health care forums (15.47%) as shown in table 1

8.51%

15.69%

Professional position
Managerial position

17.33%

Technical position

18.227%

5.81%

Support position

Freelancer

30.09%

28.38%

Student

under 1000 RON


1100-1500 RON
1600-1800 RON

Sales position
Retired

388.42%

1900-2200 RON

15.699%

2300-2500 RON

21.81%

over 2500 RON

Other
Fig. 2: The percentages of jobs of the respondents

Fig. 3: The percentages of monthly incomes of the respondents

Source: Gheorghe, I.R. (2012) Marketing Communications in Health Care Services. An Electronic Word-off Mouth Approach (Doctoral thesis).
Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, p. 151

579

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585
Table 1: The percentages of the methods used by respondents to find a physician

Was recommended by the General Practitioner

6.25%

Was recommended by friends

12.83%

Was recommended by family members

26.63%

Heard about the physician from newspapers, journals, TV, radio

2.80%

Heard about him from the internet

15.47%

Other methods

37.02%

Source: Gheorghe, I.R. (2012) Marketing Communications in Health Care Services. An Electronic Word-of-Mouth Approach (Doctoral thesis).
Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, p. 151

3.2. SERVQUAL Scale Applied in Health Care Services


3.2.1.

Internal Consistency of the SERVQUAL Scale

alpha is a value that ranges from 0 to 1. The value 0.7 was indicated to be the accepted limit (Nunnally, 1978) but
other values lower than this, for instance 0.6, were encountered in the literature (e.g. Wright, 2007). However, the
ha should not be lower than 0.5 (Hair et al, 1998). As such, for the overall

dimension are illustrated in table 2.


r every dimension
included
Dimension

Expectation

Perception

Tangibles

0.50

0.65

Reliability

0.51

0.96

Responsiveness

0.57

0.94

Assurance

0.52

0.94

Empathy

0.54

0.93

0.61

0.73

Combined scales: 0.67


Source: Gheorghe, I.R. (2012) Marketing Communications in Health Care Services. An Electronic Word-of-Mouth Approach (Doctoral thesis).
Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, p. 153

580

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

3.2.2. Factor analysis


Factor analysis is a method used to diminish the number of items contained in a scale into a more composite scale
based on the relationships established between the initial items (Hair et al, 2009). Actually, factor analysis offers the
possibility to uncover latent structures by grouping the items already observed in a scale. Variables that load on one
factor should have the highest values, eventually higher than 0.4, that would explain the variance according to a high
percentage.
Before performing the factor analysis, a preliminary statistical test, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index
in order to examine if data are inter-correlated.
lower than 0.05. In our case, the KMO index for the expectation scale was 0.75 while the perception scale was 0.84
inter-correlated and the factor analysis is suitable to be performed.
The method employed to uncover variables by the factor analysis us the correlation matrix. SPSS has five
methods of determining the rotation of a matrix, but in our case we used the Varimax rotation. Table 3 and Table 4
show that for each scale, factors load accordingly on their dimensions.
3.2.3. The Gap Analysis
Service quality is calculated as the difference between the perception and the expectation for each dimension,
Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 indicate the gaps assessed for every dimension included in the
SERVQUAL scale.
Table 3: The Rotation Matrix of the Expectation Scale, Source: Gheorghe, I.R. (2012) Marketing Communications in Health Care Services. An
Electronic Word-of-Mouth Approach (Doctoral thesis). Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, p. 157
Component
1

e_ta1

.643

-.097

.125

.219

-.119

e_ta2

.618

-.232

.183

.154

-.142

e_ta3

.537

-.144

.227

.174

-.104

e_ta4

.490

.271

.017

.162

-.003

e_rel1

.038

-.050

-.087

.634

.186

e_rel2

.052

-.045

-.015

.820

-.659

e_rel3

-.050

-.049

-.149

.491

-.100

e_rel4

.067

.034

-.147

.651

.456

e_rel5

.026

-.153

.068

.666

-.187

e_resp1

-.260

.495

-.252

.123

.132

e_resp2

-.040

.806

-.011

-.131

-.099

e_resp3

.096

.427

.121

.055

.109

e_resp4

.087

.724

.019

-.092

-.201

e_ass1

-.067

.118

.174

-.254

.458

e_ass2

.236

.226

-.172

-.462

.478

e_ass3

.350

.178

-.193

.037

.635

e_ass4

-.011

.078

-.107

-.058

.683

e_emp1

-.203

-.004

.659

-.006

-.025

581

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

e_emp2

-.145

.188

.476

.293

-.061

e_emp3

.004

.121

.726

.045

.255

e_emp4

.048

.030

.504

-.004

-.087

e_emp5

.074

.081

.609

-.077

-.039

Table 4: The Rotation Matrix of the Perception Scale


Component
1

p_t1

-.002

-.065

-.086

-.024

.672

p_t2

.077

.038

-.054

-.024

.794

p_t3

-.056

-.009

-.133

-.196

.804

p_t4

.030

-.056

.078

-.048

.470

p_rel1

.944

-.035

-.047

-.021

.048

p_rel2

.961

-.015

-.049

-.018

.041

p_rel3

.897

-.032

-.058

-.077

-.013

p_rel4

.909

.048

.048

.015

.006

p_rel5

.941

-.040

-.026

.005

.014

p_resp1

-.044

.028

-.009

.959

-.066

p_resp2

-.078

.070

-.049

.898

-.019

p_resp3

-.014

-.010

-.015

.919

-.106

p_resp4

.048

.007

-.015

.898

-.146

p_ass1

-.030

-.018

.935

-.070

-.071

p_ass2

-.037

.031

.906

-.028

-.073

p_ass3

-.033

.033

.931

-.018

.003

p_ass4

-.021

.064

.960

.029

-.028

p_emp1

-.020

.990

.020

.030

-.023

p_emp2

-.026

.929

-.006

.009

-.028

p_emp3

-.017

.846

.010

.005

-.080

p_emp4

.010

.795

.066

.032

-.011

p_emp5

-.019

.907

.016

.022

-.018

Table 5: Average Tangibles SERVQUAL Score


Factors under Tangibles
Dimension

Expectation

(Average)

Perception

Gap Score (ExpectationPerception)

IT1

2.02

-1.98

IT2

1.96

-2.04

IT3

1.84

-2.16

IT4

2.08

-1.92

Average Tangibles Gap Score

-2.02

Average Tangibles
SERVQUAL Score
1.97

582

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585
Table 6: Average Reliability SERVQUAL Score
Factors under Reliability
IT1
IT2
IT3
IT4
IT5

5
3.47
5
3.46
4
3.38
4
3.36
4
3.72
Average Reliability Gap Score

Gap Score (Expectation-1.53


-1.54
-0.62
-0.64
-0.28
-0.92

Average Reliability
3.47

Table 7: Average Responsiveness SERVQUAL Score


Factors under
Responsiveness
Dimension

Expectation

IT1
IT2

(Average)

Gap Score (ExpectationPerception)

3.21

-0.79

3.00

-2.00

IT3

3.03

-0.97

IT4

2.70

-1.30

Average Tangibles Gap Score

Average Responsiveness
SERVQUAL Score

2.98

-1.26

Table 8: Average Assurance SERVQUAL Score


Factors under Assurance
Dimension

Expectation
(Average)

Gap Score (ExpectationPerception)

IT1

3.62

-0.38

IT2

3.52

-1.48

IT3

3.32

-0.68

IT4

2.88

-1.12

Average Tangibles Gap Score

Average Assurance
SERVQUAL Score
3.33

-0.91

Table 9: Average Empathy SERVQUAL Score

Factors under Empathy


Dimension

Expectation
(Average)

Gap Score (ExpectationPerception)

IT1
IT2

3.10

-0.9

3.16

-0.84

IT3

3.43

-0.57

IT4

3.24

-0.76

IT5

3.38

-0.62

Average Reliability Gap Score

Average Empathy
SERVQUAL Score
3.26

-0.73

Source: Gheorghe, I.R. (2012) Marketing Communications in Health Care Services. An Electronic Word-of-Mouth Approach (Doctoral thesis).
Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, p. 155

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

4. Discussion
The implementation of the SERVQUAL scale in order to assess service quality, proved to be a controversial
ality in the
context of health care services, even if they differ significantly from the ones of the providers.
In a dynamic environment in which there is a continuous change in demographics, preferences and lifestyles, it is
required a persistent investigation of the consumer expectations and perceptions if an organization desires to survive
on a long term period. Understanding the health care consumer in a competitive market is highly important and
relevant. Apart from organizations, researching the consu
into the quality of health care industry overall. An improvement in the health care system can reduce the in-patient
stays and lower mortality. Failing to accomplish the needs of patients in a health care environment can lead to
identify opportunities and draw their weaknesses. From a managerial perspective, SERVQUAL helps when
organizati
of the service gaps and the intention to close these gaps by managers is likely to increase the service quality
perception and the consumer satisfaction.
Most specialists measured the service quality in health care using the SERVQUAL instrument as the difference
between perceptions and expectations, known as the gap. Thus, the values of the gap varied across contexts. For
instance, Mangold and Babakus (1991) and Babakus and Mangold (1992) measured the service quality in a US
hospital, concluding that the assurance had the lowest gap score, followed by reliability, responsiveness, empathy
and tangibles. Moreover, Lam (1997) applied the SERVQUAL scale in a hospital in Hong Kong. It was concluded
that the highest gap score was registered by the empathy dimension, followed by responsiveness, assurance and
reliability. Furthermore, Lim and Tang (2000) applied the SERVQUAL scale in a hospital located in Singapore and
concluded that responsiveness was the dimension that had the highest gap score, followed by assurance and
reliability. In Romania, Popa et al (2011) assessed the service quality in Oradea that resulted in the highest gap score
for empathy followed by reliability and assurance. In our case study, tangibles dimension turned out to have the
highest gap score, followed by responsiveness and reliability.
Tangibles dimension, having a negative value means that marketing managers should invest as soon as possible
consumers in service industries, lacking the technical knowledge, try to evaluate a service after tangible elements
such as the environment and the price. Managers should be careful at their health care environments maybe by
applying strategies used in ergonomics, as for example music. In order to raise the scores of responsiveness and
reliability dimensions, managers should pay great attention to the recruitment stage of their personnel based on
backgrounds and communication with patients.
5. References
Andaleeb, S.S. (2001) Service Quality Perceptions and Patient Satisfaction. A study of hospitals in a developing country, Social Science and
Medicine, 52, p. 1359-1370
Babakus, E. and Mangold, W.G. (1992) Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: An empirical investigation, Health Services
Research, 26, pp. 768-786
Berry, L. (1983) Services Marketing is different, Business, 30, p. 23-26
Berry, L. and Beudapudi, N. (2007) Health care. A fertile field for services research, Journal of Service Research, 10(2), p. 111-122
Bowers, M.R., Swan, J.E., Koehler, W.F. (1994) What attributes determine quality and satisfaction with healthcare delivery? Healthcare
Management Review, 19(4), p. 49-55
Brown, S.W. and Swartz, T.A. (1989) A gap analysis of professional service quality, Journal of Marketing, 53, p. 92-98
International Journal of Health Care Quality
Assurance, 11(4), p. 127-133
Carman, J.M. (1990) Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions, Journal of Retailing, 66(1), p. 3355

583

584

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

Catoiu, I. (Ed.), Balan, C., Orzan, G., Popescu, I.C., Veghes, C., Danetiu, T., Vranceanu, D. (2002). Cercetari de Marketing. Bucharest: Uranus
Publishing House
Cronin, J.J. and Taylor, S.A. (1992) Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension, Journal of Marketing, 56(3), p. 55-68
Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K., Hult, G.T.M. (2000) Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral
intentions in service environments, Journal of Retailing, 76(2), p. 193-218
Dagger, T.S. and Sweeney, J.C. (2006) The effect of service evaluation on behavioral intentions and quality of life, Journal of Service Research,
9(1), p. 2-19
Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(1), p. 49-53
Gabbott, M. and Hogg, G. (1998). Consumers and Services. Chichester: Wiley
Gheorghe, I.R. (2012) Marketing Communications in Health Care Services. An Electronic Word-of-Mouth Approach (Doctoral thesis). Academy
of Economic Studies, Bucharest
Gounaris, S.P., Stathakopoulos, V., Athanassopoulos, A.D. (2003) Antecedents to perceived service quality: an exploratory study in the banking
industry, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(4/5), p. 168-190
Gronroos, C. (1983) Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector. Boston: Marketing Science Institute
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River
Harvey, J. (1998) Service quality: a tutorial, Journal of Operations Management, 16, p. 583-597
Heskett, J.L., Sasser, W.E., Schlesinger, L.A. (1997) The Service-Profit Chain, Free Press, New York
Janda, S., Trocchia, P.J., Gwinner, K.P. (2002) Consumer perceptions of internet retail. International Journal of Service Industry Management,
13(5), p. 412-431
Johnston, R. (1995) The determinants of service quality: satisfiers and dissatisfiers, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(5),
p. 53-71
Kozinets, R.V. (2010). Netnography. Doing ethnographic research online, London: Sage
Ladhari, R. (2009) A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1, p. 172-198
in Hong Kong. Total Quality Management, 8(4),
p. 145-152
Lehtinen, U. and Lehtinen, J. (1982) Service Quality: a study of quality dimensions. Service Management Institute, Helsinki
isfaction in Singapore hospitals, International Journal of Health
Care Quality Assurance, 13, p. 290-299
Marketing Health Services, 21(3), p. 33-34
Lovelock, C. and Wright, L. (2002) Principles of service marketing and management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Mangold, W.G. and Babakus, E. (1991) Service quality: The front-stage vs. the back-stage perspective, Journal of Services Marketing, 5(4), p.
59-70
McDougall, G. and Levesque, T. (1994) A revised review of service quality dimension: an empirical investigation, Journal of Professional
Service Marketing, 11(1), p. 189-210
Mei, A.W.O., Dean, A.M., White, C.J. (1999) Analyzing service quality in the hospitality industry, Managing Service Quality, 9(2), p. 136-143
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill
Parasuraman, A. (1998) Customer service in business-to-business markets: An agenda for research. Journal of Business and Industrial
Marketing, 13, p. 309-321
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L., Zeithaml, V. (1991) Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale, Journal of Retailing, 66(2), p. 34-45
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., Berry, L. (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality,
Journal of Retailing, 64(1), p. 12-40
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research, Journal of
Marketing, 49, p. 41-50
Popa, A.L., Rosca, R.D., Mihoc, F. (2011) Investigating the Patient satisfaction within Romanian Public and Private Hospitals. Available online
at: http://core.kmi.open.ac.uk/display/1057879, accessed 11.07.2012
Ramsaran-Fowdar, R.R. (2005) Identifying healthcare quality attributes, Journal of Health and Human Service Administration, 27(4), p. 428-443
Reidenbach, R.E. and Sandifer-Smallwood, B. (1990) Exploring perceptions of hospital operations by a modified SERVQUAL approach,
Journal of Health Care Marketing, 10(4), p. 47-55
Schneider, B. and White, S. (2004). Service Quality: Research Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Sureshchander, G.S., Rajendran, C., Anantharaman, R.N. (2002) The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction- a factorspecific approach, Journal of Services Marketing, 16(4), p. 363-379
Tomes, A. and Ng, S.C.P. (1995) Service quality in hospital care: the development of in-patient questionnaire, International of Health Care
Quality Assurance, 8(3), p. 25-33
Tucker, J.L. and Adams, S.R
of their care, Managing Service Quality, 11(4), p. 272-287
Uzun, O. (2001) Patient satisfaction with nursing care at a university hospital in Turkey, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 16(1), p. 24-33
Warbridge, SW and Delene, LM (1993) Measuring Physician Attitudes of Service Quality, Journal of Health Care Marketing, 13(1), p. 175-180
Wright, B.E. (2007) Public service and motivation: does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), p. 54-64
Yoon, S. and Suh, H. (2004) Ensuring IT consulting SERVQUAL and user satisfaction: a modified measurement tool. Information Systems
Frontiers, 6(4), p. 341-351

Victor Lorin Purcrea et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 573 585

Zeithaml, V., Berry, L., Parasuraman, A. (1993) The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, 21(1), p. 1-12
Zeithaml, V., Bitner, M.J., Gremler, D.D. (2009) Services marketing: integrating customer focus across the firm (5th edition). New York: McGraw Hill
Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L. (1990) Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations, New York:
The Free Press

585