Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
50
The
AmericanAtheist
(Vol. 23, No. 10) October,
....
"
LEBA~oN
....
..
1981
III
NEWS
ro
ON THE COVER
Go! California!
6
ARTICLES
7
16
18
FEATURED COLUMNISTS
Hell Is Not for Children - Richard M. Smith
19
21
23
25
REGULAR FEATURES
Letters to The Editor
Editorial: Israel-
Jon G_ Murray
14
26
27
Editor-in-Chief
Madalyn Murray O'Hair
Managing Editor
Jon G. Murray
Poetry
Angeline Bennett
Robin Eileen Murray-O'Hair
Gerald Tholen
Production Staff
David Kent
Richard Richardson
Richard Smith
Gerald Tholen
Gloria Tholen
Ralph Shirley
Non-resident Staff
James E. Brodhead
G. Stanley Brown
Ignatz Sahula-Dycke
Fred Woodworth
Austin, Texas
Page 1
Dear Janet,
One of the most compelling reosons for the establishment of an
Atheist organization in the first place
was to provide Atheists with a
meeting ground and a basis for
communication. You will be surprised now that you are 'out of the
closet' how many other Atheists will
come to you. Freedom of the mind is
a great feeling, isn't it?
Jon
Page 2
Dear sir,
I must take offense at your letter,
not for being referred to as "primates, N because basically that is
correct. The -insult comes from the
fact that you accuse LIS of crying
Nwolr and because you insinuate
that we are greedy.
I suppose that you could compare
us with the sparrows who eat at
your feeder. A truly reasonable man
might feel well compensated by the
fact that those sparrows dropped by
and made the day a little more
pleasurable. I wonder if the sparrows feel greedy?
As for myself - I am doing what I
feel is necessary for me to do:
change the world a little for the
better. I regret that you seem to feel
that we are imposing on your generosity or that we may unnecessarily
be trying to frighten you.
In any event we do thank you for
your past support, and I hope that
you have found at least some comfort in the fact that there are Atheists
who are devoted to trying to make
your world a little less primitive and
ignorant.
Sincerely,
Gerald Tholen
American Atheist
Editorial
Jon G. Murray
ISRAEL
Austin, Texas
Page 3
The news is chosen to demonstrate, month after month, the dead reactionary hand of religion. It dictates your habits, sexual conduct, family size. It
censures cinema, theater, television, even education. It dictates life values and lifestyles. Religion is politics and, always, the most authoritarian and
reactionary politics. We editorialize our news to emphasize this thesis. Unlike any other magazine or newspaper in the United States, we say so.
Page 4
American Atheist
Focus on Atheists
... and we won't take it anymore!
Statement to the Media
Upon
Filing of Mississippi Suit
Austin, Texas
!I
- Page 5
Page 6
by a non-
GO! CALIFORNIA!
It's about time!
The United States Supreme Court, cowed by fear of
organized religion, has issued opinion after opinion in
conflict with the intent of the First Amendment mandatewhat Thomas Jefferson
called "a wall of separation"
between state and church. Describing prayer as a gavel,
seeing "benevolent" neutrality, swallowing the "child benefit" thf'Drv thf' Stlpremf' Court has rf'citlcen thai stone wall
to a vacillating, often broken, thin line as it yielded more
and more to church political power.
Some state court, somewhere,
neo tu :-:lIdV~ LUUI d~~
enough to say that the Supreme Court deals from coward
ice. not principle, and California did that on August 27th.
That state's Supreme Court in a unanimous decision (seven
judges) held that it is unconstitutional
for the state of
California to "loan" textbooks to parochial schools.
The program, which cost the state $3.6 million dollars
annually, "loaned" texts to private schools. 9OQ" of which
were religious. Of the ex)'\. which were religious, 73'\. were
roman catholic. The funding put a serious drain on public
school budgets. Called asubterfuge, which ISwhat Indeed
it was, the California Teachers Association.
which chal.Ienged the program. pointed out that such a "loan" was a
sidestep to enable the state to subsidize religious schools.
The state officials whined as answer that it met U.S.
Supreme Court approved standards which permitted such
.nd as long as the primal'.' t1enf'ficianes were school children
and their parents, not the private schools. The dodge
should be apparent to a IOyearold
Reviewing three cases where the U.S Supreme Court
had surrendered
to religion, the California Court said
simply that the buck stopped there. This is aid to religion,
pure and simple, and as aid It u.cs stopped. Congratulations, California! If that message can only "trickle up" to the
U. S. Supreme Court, there is hope yet.
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
II
Page 7
PageS
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
IV
Page 9
The first dime with the motto was the Winged Liberty
[Mercury - the Roman god who served as herald and
messenger of the other gods] of 1916. It was not assigned to
the twenty-cent pieces, trade dollars or $1, $2.50 and $3 gold
pieces.
The next person to influence coinage design was Theodore Roosevelt. He had long been interested in art and
sculpture, and was quite excited when he encountered. on
August 3rd, 1903, an equestrian statue of General Sherman
at the Fifth Avenue entrance to Central Park. New York.
The sculptor was Augustus Saint-Gaudens.
Roosevelt
immediately commissioned Saint-Gaudens
to prepare his
inauguration
medal. The quality of the medal was so
excellent that he decided to change the nation's coinage
designs, which he considered to be of poor artistic quality.
He questioned Secretary of the Treasury Leslie M. Shaw,
who told him that there was no legal impediment to his
requesting new coin designs from Saint-Gaudens.
Shaw
pointed out that the director of the mint, with the approval
of the Secretary of the Treasury, had discretionary power,
that coin design was not mandated by Congress. Roosevelt
immediately wrote the artist [November 6. 1905] and
commissioned new designs.
Saint-Gaudens
reworked various designs for over Ig
months, and Roosevelt was closely interested in the conceptualizations. Saint-Gaudcnv'xon.
in writinc his father's biouraphy, notes, "Finally he attacked the difficult problem of
the inscriptions by placing upon the previously milled edge
of the coin, in one case. the forty-six stars and, in the others,
the thirteen stars with the' E Pluribus Unum. 'The motto 'In
God We Trust: as an inartistic intrusion not required by
law. he wholly discarded and thereby drew down upon
himself the lightning of public comment. It is interesting to
discover in regard to this that Secretary Salmon P. Chase
received quite as severe a censure for placing the words upon
this coin as was aroused by their removal." The Reminis-
cences ofAugustus
Saint-Gaudens, edited by Homer SaintGaudens.
Roosevelt's efforts to change the coins were met with stiff
resistance from mint officials who resented his intrusion into
their interest sphere. Roosevelt, however, was quite concerned to have attractive coins and saw that the work on
them was pushed [which included the necessity of purchasing a new 'Janvier machine]. The first coins were put into
circulation about 18th November, 1907.
At this point the public had become aware that the motto
"In God We Trust" had been dropped from the new $10 and
$20 gold pieces. The matter became a religious and political
issue. However, the church publications of the day tended
overwhelmingly
to support Roosevelt. For example, a
major Presbyterian
publication,
The Westminster, commented in part:
'The motto is a relic from the days when pious phrases
were inscribed on regalia. public documents, weapons
of war. and coins. They have been omitted, one by one,
not perhaps because real trust in 90d has waned, but
because of an increasing sense of their incongruity and
a keener sense of their true meaning.' .
Roosevelt's reasoning for the omission has been ascribed to
certain letters he purportedly wrote. One such is reproduced
in The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt. edited by Elting E.
Morison, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, 1952. This letter is written to Rev. Roland C. Dryer
of l\ unda , New York, one of the persons protesting through
organizations and individually, concerned with the omission of the motto from the coinage. This letter was dated
11th November.
1907. However, another letter written
allegedly to William Boldly was "discovered" in an auction
of the Bowers and Ruddy Galleries' American Auction
Avsoc iar io n under number I24Q "f tilt' Ke nvinuton
Collcction. and was sold in 1975. The Harvard issue book had been
printed 23 years prior. The letters are identicalc- as follows:
no entanglement
"in god we trust" adde d
COINS
HALF
1790 1800
CENT
ONE CENT
TWO C(NT
THREE
CENT
T!-tAU
CENT <AGl
!
I
OIUE
OIW[
I,
I
SLYER
DOlLAR
OOUl"'Ect
2..30
GOLDPCE
3.00
GOlOP'l[CE
4.00
GOLOPECE
s.oo
GOLDF'tECE
10.00
GOt.DPr[CE
20.00
GOLOPCE
Id
i
I
L..
DOLLAR
CURRENCY
I
1280
..
HALF DOllAR
'-'>0
TWE~TY CEIifT
QuARTER
1950
"'ICK[l
HALF
1900
1850
2: DOLLARS
,
.-
OOLLARS
10 COLLARS
2C DOLLARS
'0
00
soo
DOLLARS
DOlL.ARS
DOlJ...,ARS
t..OOO OOLLAFIS
o.ooo
"'0,000
Page 10
DOLLARS
DOLLARS
I
Vendemiaire (October) 11,981
c:=
c::=:J
'American Atheist
Two years after the 2-cent piece made its debut. another
denomination. the S-cent piece. ~ms introduced. The two
obverse designs were quite similar (below).
Sincerely yours
Theodore Roosevelt ..
The pressures of the religious community, which ignored
any concept of state;' church separation,
were felt in
Congress, and in 1908 that body considered a bill to make
the use of the motto "In God We Trust" a requirement of
law. A report was issued by the Committee on Coinage,
Weights and Measures. to accompany H. R. 17296. and the
thrust of this report was that the "measure simply reflects the
reverent and religious conviction which underlies American
citizenship. "The report also characterized the United States
as a "Christian nation" and evidenced that the intent of the
motto was religious. The report follows:
"Your subcommittee deems it unnecessary to recount
in detail the history of the legislation which required
the stamping of this significant motto on certain
denominations of gold and silver coinage of the United
States, except to say that by the act ofJanuary,
1837,
mottoes and devices for our coins were prescribed. and
that in April, 1864, in March, 1865. and in February.
1873, laws were enacted by Congress
providing
substantially that the words "In God We Trust" might
be inscribed upon such coins of the United States as
would admit of such inscription. and that in pursuance
of such authority the Hon. Salmon P. Chase. the then
Secretary
of the Treasury
of the United States,
directed that the inscription "In God We Trust" be
stamped on gold and silver coins of certain denominations.
"Numerous
petitions have been referred to your
subcommittee
from various sources throughout
the
United States asking Congress to restore this motto on
the coinage as has. been done since the passage of the
acts above referred to, and until the omission of the
same from certain gold coins of the United States
known as 'The St. Gaudens. 'These petitions all ask for
Page 11
Page 12
American Atheist
Austin. Texas
Page 13
Atheist Masters
. Page 14
Robert G. Ingersoll
Written for The Boston Investigator
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
Jehovah was not a moral god. He had all the vices, and he
lacked all the virtues. He generally carried out his threats,
but he never faithfully kept a promise.
At the same time, we must remember that the old
testament is a natural production, that it was written by
savages who were slowly crawling toward the light. We
must give them credit for the noble things they said, and we
must be charitable enough to excuse their faults and even
their crimes.
I know that many christians regard the old testament as
the foundation and the new as the superstructure, and while
many admit that there are faults and mistakes in the old
testament, they insist that the new is the flower and perfect
fruit.
I admit that there are many good things in the new
testament, and if we take from that book the dogmas of
eternal pain, of infinite revenge, of the atonement, of human
sacrifice, of the necessity of shedding blood; if we throw
away the doctrine of non-resistance, of loving enemies, the
idea that prosperity is the result of wickedness, that poverty
is a preparation for paradise, ifwe throw all these away and
take the good, sensible passages, applicable to conduct,
then we can make a fairly good moral guide - narrow, but
moral.
Of course, many important things would be left out. You
would have nothing about human rights, nothing in favor of
the family, nothing for education, nothing for investigation,
for thought and reason, but still you would have a fairly good
moral guide.
On the other hand, ifyou would take the foolish passages,
the extreme ones, you could make a creed that would
satisfy an insane asylum.
If you take the cruel passages, the verses that inculcate
eternal hatred, verses that writhe and hiss like serpents, you
can make a creed that would shock the heart of a hyena.
It may be that no book contains better passages than the ~
new testament, but certainly no book contains worse.
Below the blossom of love you find the thorriof hatred; on
the lips that kiss, you find the poison of the cobra.
The bible is not a moral guide.
Any man who follows faithfully all its teachings is an
enemy of society and willprobably end his days in a prison
or an asylum.
What is morality?
In this world we need certain things. We have many
wants. We are exposed to many dangers. We need food,
fuel, raiment and shelter, and besides these wants, there is
what may be called the hunger of the mind.
We are conditioned beings, and our happiness depends
upon conditions. There are certain things that diminish,
certain things that increase, well-being. There are certain
things that destroy and there are others that preserve.
Happiness, including its highest forms, is after all the only
good, and everything, the result of which is to produce or
secure happiness, is good, that is to say, moral. Everything
that destroys or diminishes well-being is bad, that is to say,
immoral. In other words, all that is good is moral, and all that
is bad is immoral.
What then is, or can be called, a moral guide? The
shortest possible answer is one word: Intelligence.
We want the experience of mankind, the true history of
Page IS
Page 16
American Atheist
RELIGION IN FRANCE
As far as I know, there has been no official Gallup poll
about religion published in France since 1972. At that time,
a rough estimate was that out of ten people, nine had
received the catholic baptism; seven asserted that they
believed in god; fewer than four reported themselves
convinced of jesus christ's divinity; two would go to church
every sunday. Thus, one is allowed to conclude, according
to these figures, that 30% of the population, all ages mixed,
actually were non- believers,
whereas
only 20% were
practicing believers. Up to now, there is no evidence of any
significant change in favor of the church.
One of the major concerns of the roman catholic church
in France, as well as in all industrialized countries is the
steady decrease in ecclesiastical
callings. We have no
figures available since 1975, when the number of secular
priests was estimated to be 32,000 (1970: 36,000; 1965:
41,000) for a global population amounting to about fifty
million. But one can see no reason why this number would
be higher than 28,000 now. Otherwise it would mean a
sudden reverse of the trend, and it is perfectly obvious that
the catholic church would have made a fuss about it.
Such a disaffection for priesthood largely accounts for all
in
Austin, Texas
Page 17
Page 18
American Atheist
That woman was not a thief by nature. Her words about god
were merely an outward form in which, by force of habit,
she expressed her moral convictions and feelings. It is our
conscience that prompts us to do good, and conscience is a
quality intrinsic in both believers and non-believers.
If a person obeys the demands made on him by some
authority, be it god, society or a social institution, he
displays discipline and obedience. But morality supposes a
free choice, freedom of action. A moral deed is not one done
at somebody's order but one done according to the dictates
of reason and conscience.
True, conscience Can sometimes be in the wrong. Many
crimes against humanity were perpetrated
with clear
conscience. The history of religions provides numerous
examples of this. People killed, plundered and tortured
others while being confident that they were acting in a way
that pleased the lord. Much depends on how conscience
OC
Richard M. Smith
Austin, Texas
III"
Of'
Page 19
and yet that is not half as bad as what hell is supposed to be.
Christians have in the past unanimously' concurred in
developing exquisite scenes of torture in hell. Unfortu-.
nately, I don't have the time or money to keep track of
present-day preachers, but we do have these scenes drawn
by their forebears.
Here is how John Calvin, founder of the presbyterian
. church and burner of Servetus, described sinners in hell:
"Forever harassed with a dreadful tempest, they shall feel
themselves torn asunder by an angry god and transfixed
and penetrated by mortal stings, terrified by the thunderbolts of god and broken by the weight of his hand, so that to
sink into any gulf would be more tolerable than to stand for a
moment in these terrors. Even infants bring their damnation
with them."
I don't think that I would be very far wrong in guessing
that the notorious Michigan minister uses words like these
from Jonathan Edwards when he isn't using electricity:
'Their eyes, their tongues, their hands, their feet, their loins,
and their vitals shall forever be full of a glowing, melting fire,
fierce enough to melt the very rocks and elements; and also,
they shall eternally be full of the most quick and lively sense
to feel the torment ... not for one minute, nor for one day,
nor for one year, nor for one age, nor for a hundred ages,
nor for ten thousand or a million ages, one after another, but
for ever and ever without any ending at all, and never, never
be delivered."
We don't have to go far into the past, though, to find
written words to scare the * * * * out of children. A booklet
written in 1950 by Paul Schulte, archbishop of Indianapolis,
was especially designed for children and contained these
words: "As they peered into this dreadful place, the terrified
youngsters saw huge numbers of devils and damned souls.
The devils resembled hideous black animals, each fillilJgthe
air with desperate shrieks. The damned souls were in their
human bodies and seemed to be brown in color, tumbling
about constantly in the flames and screaming with terror.
All were on fire within and without their bodies, and neither
devils nor damned souls seemed able to control their
movements. They were tossing about in the flames like fiery
coals in a furnace. There was never an instant's peace or
freedom from pain."
It's like taking a child to a horror movie and telling him or
her over and over again that it's for real.
This particular form of shock therapy doesn't just last for
a second, either, because the preacher can spend as long as
he wants drilling it ever so relentlessly into the susceptible
gullible. person's brain. Then, when the victims are out of
church, they can still readminister the shock to themselves
simply by remembering the words of the preacher. It's very
insidious how it works.
I know these things to be true because I experienced
them myself when I was younger with no one wise enough to
tell me the truth. I know that I am not alone, either. There
are millions of people in this country who, no matter how
sophisticated they may now be, believed in and experienced
intense fear of hell as a young child. There are still further
millions who still do as adults. Some of them, horribly
enough, are running the country.
This shock therapy is still practiced every week by
thousands of preachers and should stop. Although some of
Page 20
them preach less explicit scenarios of hell, they all carry the
same basic message - an eternity of pain. Does anyone
protest? Do the newspapers
report it with their other
religious news? No. "Conservative" papers, of course, have
always agreed with its practice, so naturally they don't
report it in a realistic or outspoken fashion. For example,
the local Austin" conservative" paper put the picture of the
agonized eight-year-old on a back page. "Liberal" newspapers have treated fire and brimstone preachers
as a
"colorful" (to use the adjective of the local "liberal" Austin
paper) part of American culture.
What a shame! Children all across the country are given
the shock treatment of fear of hell and the press either
ignores it or calls it "colorful." You and I may laugh at these
preachers,
but many of those children and even their
parents cannot, because they believe it. They not only
believe it, but they regard us as evil for laughing -.They are in
a menta1.trap from which they must be freed for our sake as
well as theirs. The teaching of the fear of hell as a serious
doctrine is something which should be exposedas
super-
American Atheist
On Our Way
Ignatz Sahula-Dycke
PRAYERBOOK GAMBLE
To me, the first of the seven
wonders of the modern world is the
larger portion of the globe's people
who believe there exists something
or other that's greater than Nature.
Within this group are the diehard
theists who proclaim that without its
christianist
heritage our Western
civilization would never have attained
its cultural eminence. They are folk
who at the same time paid only
minimal attention
to the sundry
civilizations which, before passing
into oblivion, posted the warning
that human imaginativeness and not
any religion is the foundation
on
which any advanced culture should
count for its continuance.
Most of
the people who ignore this anciently
observed fact are the gritty kind who
in the mass - when facing a crisis respond muscularly, usually easing
their closed mind with a battle cry,
the sports page, or, in a pinch, a
sixpack mulled with a biblical quotation. Politically right of center, they
insist that stern measures
which
produced desired results twenty or
forty years ago, will ~ if reinstituted
- work and function
culturally
precisely as before.
At election time such folk vote for
the candidate who best articulates
he will keep them well fed, out of
harm's way, and entertained. But in
any emergency that calls for rational
impartiality, sobriety, and analytical
reflection, their attendant perversity
makes them almost useless in the
planning required for its solution.
They consequently become the pawns
or tools of those who pull the strings;
of those who are aware that the
stakes in the contest under way are
the peace of mind and welfare of
millions of human beings together
with the guardianship of entire continents on which they live.
It seems almost a waste of effort,
but it's presently imperative to face
Austin, Texas
Page 21
Page 22
American Atheist
David L. Kent
Austin, Texas
Page 23
Governor's
intervention,
Cotton Mather in a rather
deranged move, wrote and published Wonders of the
Invisible World, a defense of witchcraft. (He also believed at
the time that the sun revolved around the earth, a belief
shared by Samuel Sewall, the judge who had condemned
the "witches" to death. Sewall later rose to jurisprudential
heights in Massachusetts,
Good.)
The memory of Rebecca Nurse and Mary Esty, combined
with the Governor's intervention and the belated change in
religious policy, produced an intense and rigidly controlled
psychological upheaval in the wake of these killings. The
suggestion of Mary Esty that these jurors were shedding
innocent
blood was a suggestion
that could not be
spiritually tolerated by these bible-believers, who could
easily inure themselves to human suffering and death if cast
in the proper religious framework by their professional
divines. The implications of guilt of that sort, rather than any
concern
at all for the families of the victims, were
unanswerable to their belief. But they tried.
First came Samuel Sewall, who on the official Day of
Repentance in 1697 stood in his pew in South Church, while
his confession was read from the pulpit: "Samuel Sewall,
sensible of the reiterated strokes of god upon himself and
family; and being sensible, that as to the Guilt contracted
upon the opening of the late Commission of Oyer and
Terminer at Salem (to which the order for this Day relates)
he is, upon many accounts, more concerned than any that
he knows of, Desires to take the Blame and shame of it
Asking pardon of men, And especially desiring prayers that
god, who has an unlimited authority, would pardon that sin
and all other his sins; personal and Relative .... " And then
came the interesting statement
of the jurors who Jiad
condemned the "witches" to die:
We whose names are underwritten, being in the year
1692 called to serve as jurors in court at Salem, on trial of
many who were by some suspected guilty of doing acts of
witchcraft upon the bodies of sundry persons - we
confess that we ourselves were not capable to understand, nor able to withstand, the mysterious delusions of
the powers of darkness and Prince of the air, but were, .
for want of knowledge in ourselves and better inforrnation from others, prevailed with to take up with such
evidence against the accused as, on further consideration and better information, we justly fear was insufficient
for the touching the lives of any (deut. XVII,6), whereby
we tear we have been instrumental, with others, though
ignorantly and unwittingly, to bring upon ourselves and
this people of the lord the guilt of innocent blood, which
sin the lord saith in scripture he would not pardon (2
kings XXIV,4) - that is, we suppose, in regard of his
-ternporal judgments[.J We do therefore hereby signify to
all in general, and to the surviving sufferers in special, our
deep sense of, and sorrow for, our errors in acting on
such evidence to the condemning of any person; and do
hereby declare, that we justly fear we were sadly deluded
and mistaken - for which we are much disquieted and
distressed in our minds, and do therefore humbly beg
forgiveness, first, of god, for christ's sake, for this our
error, and pray that god would not impute the guilt of it to
ourselves nor others; and we also prav that we may be
Page 24
American Atheist
Nature's Way
Gerald Tholen
Austin, Texas
~J
Nature's Way
I've shared my sunrise'with a friend
I've bathed in cooling rain
And kissed the dewdrops from a rose
Then watched them form again
There seems no end to lovely things
That fill my every day
And I stand constantly in awe
Of nature's wondrous way
So I shall try to pass along
What's obvious to me
And plead with you to look around
It's there for all to see
And should Ihelp some thoughtless guy
To peer beyond his nose
Perhaps then he shall learn - as I
To kiss the dewy rose
So as another sunrise smiles
On yet another day
Remember all these special things
Are simply nature's way
Page 25
Classified Advertising
L.A. No.1
Correspondence wanted with caucasian females. Must be 100% Atheist,
5'5" or taller, 130 Ibs or less. Youngish white American male, 53 years
old; 6'1" tall, 175 Ibs; non-smoker;
very light drinker. Am a construction
camp worker by trade, presently
living in Southern New Hampshire.
~.1
'''~
IT COULD BE VERSE
Angeline Bennett
Mental Case
Where
Where
Where
Where
What
What
What
What
I am boss
I reign supreme
I give the orders'
From my vantage point
Coiled neatly around your littlefinger.
is my level of concept
is my role in the play
is my station on stage
are the words I must say?
Page 26
PI
American Atheist
Madalyn O'Hair
~
~:?r:
Austin, Texas
Page 27
II
American Atheist
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
is a non-profit, non-political, educational organization, dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of state and church.
We accept the explanation of Thomas Jefferson that the "First Amendment" to the Constitution of the United States was
meant to create a "wall of separation" between state and church.
American Atheists are organized to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning religious beliefs,
creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough understanding
of them, their origins and histories;
.
.'
.
to encourage the development .and public acceptance of a human ethical system, stressing the mutual sympathy,
understanding and interdependence of all people and the corresponding responsibility of each individual in relation to
society; :.
.
to develop and propagate a culture in which man is the central figure who alone must be the source of strenqth.proqress
and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
to promote the study of the arts and sciences and of all problems affecting the maintenance, perpetuation and
enrichment of human (and other) life;
, .
to engage in such social, educational, legal and cultural activity as willbe useful and beneficial to members of American
Atheists and to society as a whole.
,
Atheism map be defined
as the mental attitude which
unreservedly accepts the
supremacy of reason and
aims at establishing a lifestyle and ethical outlook
~
verifiable by experience and
the scientific method, independent of all arbitrary assumptions of authority and
P.O. BOX 2117
creeds.
Materialism declares that
AUSTIN, TX 78768-2117
the cosmos is devoid of
immanent conscious purpose; that it is governed by
its own inherent, immutable
and impersonal laws; that
there is no supernatural
interference in human life;
that man - finding his
resources within himself --=can and must create his own
Regular Membership
$20.00/year
destiny. Materialism restores
to man his dignity and his
Students, Aged, Prisoners
intellectualintegrity.Itteaches
$lO.00/year
that we must prize our life
Familv Membership
~,
on
earth and strive always to
. $35. OO/year
improve it. It holds that man
Sustaining Membership
is capable of creating a
$100.00/year
socialsystem based on reason
Life Membership
and justice. Materialism's
$500.00
"faith" is in man and man's
abilityto transform the world
culture by his own efforts.
This is a commitment which
is in every essence lifeassert
ing. It considers the struggle
for progress as a moral
obligation and impossible
without noble ideas that
inspire man to bold creative
works. Materialism holds
that humankind's potential
for good and for an outreach
to more fulfilling cultural
development is, for all practical purposes, unlimited.
THf ATHEIST
RIGHT TO
"NO"
..
-"
Iii.
JOIN
AMERICAN
ATHEISTS
tu
...
o6oJ
..,
Q)
(I)
Vi
-Ec
"'0
...
t'D
(")
Q)
>
::J
()'Q
Q)
::J
tu
.s:
ro
U'!
tu
0-
~
~
U'!
Cl)
zr
o
~
ro
0-
::J
~
.,
ro
...
Cl)
!J)
.o
Cl)
Vl
()'Q
0
0
.,
C\3
>-
.o
C\3
Cl)
""0
....,
0
zr
0~
:::J
()'Q
C\3
Cl)
0-
. - Thomas Paine
Cl)
0-
o
Cl)
0Cl)
.s:
=r
ro
.,
ro
ro
ro
x
ro
....,
(")
U'!
ro
~
=r
ro
....,
ro
IV
.,
...::J
::