Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ajog.org
GYNECOLOGY
Cite this article as: Ye X, Yang Y, Sun X. A retrospective analysis of the effect of salpingectomy on serum antiMullerian hormone level and ovarian reserve. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2015;212:53.e1-10.
P ATIENTS
AND
M ETHODS
Patients
IVF-ET patients who visited Shanghai
Ji Ai Genetics and IVF Institute and
the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
of Fudan University between October
2012 and May 2013 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Inclusion criteria
were age <40 years, regular menstrual
cycles, and no history of ovarian surgery.
Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, ovulatory dysfunction, and
endometriosis were excluded from the
analysis. Subjects were assigned into 1 of
3 groups according to their history of
preIVF tubal surgery: unilateral salpingectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or
no tubal surgery. The institutional review
board approved this retrospective study.
Measurement of hormone levels
A 10-mL blood sample was drawn on
the third day of menstruation (IVFET initiation day). The sample was
53.e1
Research
ajog.org
Gynecology
centrifuged for 5 minutes, and the supernatant serum was collected and
stored at 20 C. Before testing, the
sample was thawed and vortexed.
Estradiol (E2), progesterone, luteinizing
hormone, and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were measured with a
Beckman Acoulter Access automated
chemiluminescence
immunoassay
analyzer with reagent kits from Beckman
(BeckmaneCoulter Inc., Brea, CA).
Testing was performed according to the
manufacturers instructions. AMH levels
were measured by an enzyme linked
immunosorbent assay using a Bio-Rad
iMark microplate absorbance reader
with reagent kits from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad
Laboratories Inc, Hercules, CA). Per the
manufacturer, the interassay coefcient
of variability is 10%, and the intraassay
coefcient of variability is 15%.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were presented as
means and standard deviations (SDs).
Categorical variables were presented as
counts and percentages. One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc
testing was performed to compare the
differences between women with unilateral salpingectomy, with bilateral salpingectomy, and without surgery with
respect to baseline characteristics and
treatment-related factors. Because the
variables were normally distributed,
Pearson coefcient correlation (r) was
performed to investigate the linear correlation between AMH vs time after
surgery, number of oocytes, and age in
women with unilateral salpingectomy
and bilateral salpingectomy. A 2-sided
P value < .05 was considered to indicate statistical signicance. All statistical
analyses were performed with SPSS
17.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc.,
Chicago, IL).
R ESULTS
Patient characteristics
A total of 198 women were included
in the study, with 83 in the unilateral
salpingectomy group, 41 in the bilateral
salpingectomy group, and 74 in the
group that had not received tubal surgery. Patient characteristics by group
are shown in Table 1. There were no
differences in age, E2, progesterone,
luteinizing hormone, AFC, ovarian
stimulation protocol used, the length of
ajog.org
Gynecology
Research
TABLE 1
Patient characteristics
Characteristic
Unilateral salpingectomy
(n [ 83)
Bilateral salpingectomy
(n [ 41)
Without surgery
(n [ 74)
P value
33.02 4.66
33.58 3.95
167.56 127.03
127.11 93.23
183.48 104.37
38.3 14.91
41.41 16.59
36.49 16.77
.291
Progesterone, nmol/L
0.52 0.29
0.55 0.33
0.54 0.32
.848
LH, mIU/mL
4.06 1.56
3.94 1.75
4.26 2.09
.63
FSH,
8.42 2.3
9.13 3.2
7.85 2.69y
.048
10.7 3.62
9.58 3.73
Age, y
AMH, (fmol/mL)
E2, pg/mL
AFC,
33.8 4.67
.553
a
.037
11.22 4.16
.097
BMI, kg/m
21.63 2.46
21.1 2.85
21.43 2.83
.582
Testosterone
38.59 13.42
32.55 9.86
37.42 18.02
.152
Short COH
52 (62.65)
17 (41.46)
38 (51.35)
31 (37.35)
24 (58.54)
36 (48.65)
Protocol
.071
< .001
1 (1.2)
1 (2.44)
79 (95.18)
24 (58.54)
3 (3.61)
16 (39.02)
Primary infertility, y
0.31 1.13
0.82 1.96
3.6 4.15a,b
Secondary infertility, y
2.85 2.81
3.23 3.24
2.36 3.32
.369
0 (0)
0 (0)
2 (2.7)
.184
< .001
Reason of infertility
Unknown
Oligoasthenoteratospermia
Severe oligoasthenoteratospermia
Obstructive azoospermia
Both male and female factors
41 (49.4)
15 (36.59)
28 (37.84)
.239
2 (2.41)
1 (2.44)
6 (8.11)
.178
2 (2.41)
28 (52.83)
0 (0)
15 (55.56)
4 (5.41)
.245
26 (55.32)
.959
P < .05, significantly different with unilateral salpingectomy group; b P < .05, significantly different with bilateral salpingectomy group.
C OMMENT
The results of this study showed that
AMH level was lower and FSH was
higher in women that received a bilateral
salpingectomy than in those that had
not received tubal surgery, although the
AFC was similar between the 3 groups.
In patients that had received a unilateral
salpingectomy, AMH was correlated
with time after surgery but not with age
or number of oocytes retrieved and
there was no correlation between AFC
and number of oocytes retrieved. In
53.e3
Research
ajog.org
Gynecology
TABLE 2
Unilateral salpingectomy
(n [ 83)
Bilateral salpingectomy
(n [ 41)
Without surgery
(n [ 74)
P value
9.6 1.76
9.39 2.12
9.78 1.62
.523
23.75 10.31
23.77 10.79
24.95 9.85
.732
3822.99 1630.06
3286.05 1629.64
3727.36 1891.94
.257
Thickness of endometrium, mm
9.84 3.3
8.98 2.58
9.84 2.95
.27
7.83 4.16
6.98 4.15
8.42 4.04
.199
4.95 3.43
4.76 3.61
5.49 3.06
.453
3.39 3.03
3.15 2.51
3.5 2.6
.807
2.72 2.69
2.44 2.24
2.69 2.39
.826
Duration of Gn therapy, d
Gn amount (vials)
E2 level on the hCG injection day, pg/mL
patients with a prior bilateral salpingectomy, AMH was not correlated with age,
time after surgery, or number of oocytes
FIGURE 1
A, Correlation between AMH and time after surgery in women with unilateral salpingectomy.
B, Correlation between AMH and number of oocytes in women with unilateral salpingectomy.
C, Correlation between AMH and age in women with unilateral salpingectomy.
AMH, antiMullerian hormone.
Ye. Salpingectomy and ovarian reserve. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015.
either the unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy groups, and AMH was not
correlated with age in all women but
correlated with age in the women that
had not received tubal surgery. There
were no signicant differences in duration of gonadotropin therapy, amount
of gonadotropin used, E2 level on the
hCG injection day, thickness of the
endometrium, number of oocytes
retrieved, number of 2PN, viable embryos, and good quality embryos between patients with unilateral or
bilateral salpingectomy or those with
no tubal surgery.
The fallopian tube is an essential
component of the female reproductive
system. The ovary is supplied by the
ovarian artery, but also by the ascending
branch of the uterine artery in the mesosalpinx. Some authors have reported
that salpingectomy reduces the ovarian
blood supply, and therefore compromises ovarian reserve.4,6 In our previous
study,17 we compared the outcomes of
controlled ovarian hyperstimulation
between patients before and after salpingectomy and found that unilateral
salpingectomy had little effect on
ovarian response to hyperstimulation
therapy, although bilateral salpingectomy was associated with reduced
ovarian sensitivity to gonadotropin, increased duration of gonadotropin therapy, and increased amount of
gonadotropin used. In the current study,
ajog.org
Gynecology
FIGURE 2
A, Correlation between AMH and time after surgery in women with bilateral salpingectomy.
B, Correlation between AMH and number of oocytes in women with bilateral salpingectomy.
C, Correlation between AMH and age in women with bilateral salpingectomy.
AMH, antiMullerian hormone.
Ye. Salpingectomy and ovarian reserve. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015.
Research
53.e5
Research
ajog.org
Gynecology
C ONCLUSIONS
Salpingectomy is associated with decreased AMH level and increased FSH
in women seeking IVF, though AMH
level is not correlated with the number
of oocytes retrieved in patients that
have undergone unilateral or bilateral
salpingectomy. Although the results
indicate an association, they should not
be interpreted as implying causation. REFERENCES
1. Ly KD, Aziz N, Sa J, Agarwal A. Evidencebased management of infertile couples with
repeated implantation failure following IVF. Curr
Womens Health Rev 2010;6:200-18.
2. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Eckerlund I. Costeffectiveness analysis of salpingectomy prior
to IVF, based on a randomized controlled trial.
Hum Reprod 2005;20:3284-92.
3. Lass A, Ellenbogen A, Croucher C, et al.
Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to
superovulation in an in vitro fertilization-embryo
transfer programe. Fertil Steril 1998;70:1035-8.
4. Ahn EH, Bai SW, Song CH, et al. Effect
of hysterectomy on conserved ovary function.
Yonsei Med J 2002;43:53-8.
5. Grynnerup AG, Lindhard A, Srensen S. AntiMllerian hormone levels in salpingectomized
compared with nonsalpingectomized women
with tubal factor infertility and women with unexplained infertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
2013;92:1297-303.
6. Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT,
Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal
hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and
ovarian stromal blood ow. J Obstet Gynecol
Res 2007;33:863-9.
7. Tal J, Paltieli Y, Korobotchka R, Ziskind G,
Eibschitz I, Ohel G. Ovarian response to
gonadotropin stimulation in repeated IVF cycles
after unilateral salpingectomy. J Assist Reprod
Genet 2002;19:451-5.
8. Dar P, Sachs GS, Strassburger D,
Bukovsky I, Arieli S. Ovary function before
and after salpingectomy in articial reproductive
technology patients. Hum Reprod 2000;5:
142-4.
ajog.org
9. Lin YJ, Ou YC, Huang FJ, et al. Ovarian
response to gonadotropins in patients with
tubal factor infertility: salpingectomy versus
nonsalpingectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
2013;20:637-41.
10. Weenen C, Laven JS, von Bergh AR, et al.
Anti-Mllerian hormone expression pattern in
the human ovary: potential implications for initial
and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod
2004;10:77-83.
11. Tsepelidis S, Devreker F, Demeestere I,
Flahaut A, Gervy Ch, Englert Y. Stable serum
levels of anti-Mullerian hormone during the
menstrual cycle: a prospective study in normoovulatory women. Hum Reprod 2007;22:
1837-40.
12. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, te Velde ER,
et al. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: a
novel measure of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod
2002;17:3065-71.
13. HehenkampWJ, LoomanCW,Themmen AP,
de Jong FH, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ.
Anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial
uctuation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:
4057-63.
14. La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC,
Volpe A. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone
throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum
Reprod 2006;21:3103-7.
15. Broer SL, Mol BW, Hendriks D,
Broekmans FJ. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril
2009;91:705-14.
16. La Marca A, Sighinol G, Radi D, et al.
Anti-Mllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive
marker in assisted reproductive technology
Gynecology
(ART). Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:
113-30.
17. Yang YZ, Han JL, Chen H, Wang C,
Pong XD. Effect of salpingectomy on ovary
function in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
Reprod Contracept 2010;30:37-9.
18. Ni L, Sadiq S, Mao Y, Cui Y, Wang W, Liu J.
Inuence of various tubal surgeries to serum
antimullerian hormone level and outcome of the
subsequent IVF-ET treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013;29:345-9.
19. Andersen CY, Byskov AG. Estradiol and
regulation of anti-Mllerian hormone, inhibin-A,
and inhibin-B secretion: analysis of small antral
and preovulatory human follicles uid. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4064-9.
20. Yding Andersen CY, Rosendahl M,
Byskov AG. Concentration of anti-Mllerian hormone and inhibin-B in relation to steroids and age
in follicular uid from small antral human follicles.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:2344-9.
21. Streuli I, Fraisse T, Pillet C, Ibecheole V,
Bischof P, de Ziegler D. Serum antimllerian
hormone levels remain stable throughout the
menstrual cycle and after oral or vaginal administration of synthetic sex steroids. Fertil Steril
2008;90:395-400.
22. Somunkiran A, Yavuz T, Yucel O, Ozdemir I.
Anti-Mllerian hormone levels during hormonal
contraception in women with polycystic ovary
syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
2007;134:196-201.
23. Bonilla-Musoles F, Castillo JC, Caballero O,
et al. Predicting ovarian reserve and reproductive
outcome using antimllerian hormone (AMH) and
antral follicle count (AFC) in patients with previous
assisted reproduction technique (ART) failure.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:13-8.
Research
53.e7
Research
Gynecology
A PPENDIX
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 1
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 2
ajog.org
ajog.org
Gynecology
Research
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 3
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 4
53.e9
Research
Gynecology
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 5
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 6
ajog.org