Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
In the second five year plan (1956-61), it had been quoted At all
times teachers is the pivot of the system of education. This is especially the
case in a period of basic change and reorientation
1.1 EDUCATION:
The process of developing the potentials of man to the optimum level in
order to enable him to lead a productive and happy life in society. Learning,
is the psychological process that enables man to acquire the competencies
required to develop his potentials. Learning, in other words, is the proves
that produces permanent behavior changes in man when he undergoes
experience. The
changes that are only desirable. Teaching is the proves of providing proper
learning experiences to the children, so that they acquire desirable
competencies in cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains- i.e.
knowledge, skills, values, attitudes and appreciations.
DEFINITION:
All to UNESCO Organized and sustained instruction designed to
communicate a combination of knowledge, skills and understanding
valuable for all the activities of life.
According to trade. The casting of false pearls before real seine.
Education ensures the preservation and continuity of every thing good in the
culture of the people and simultaneously prepares them of program
prosperity. Education is, thus the most powerful instrument of social change
and national integration. It is due recognition of this fact the kothari
education commission assigned the subtle Education and development. To
their Report. The report beings with the aphoristic statement the destiny of
India is being shaped in her class room,- a statement which sounds
1.2 TEACHER:
Literally, one who teacher, the professional personnel employed in schools
for implementation of the curriculum. Teaching is a profession
which
Adjusted life in society. For this the pupil has to posses a well-integrated
personality and sound moral and ethical values.
concept toward ourselves and others (Lehner & Kubs, 1962). It also presents
a humanistic approach towards the understanding and assessment of the self,
positive feeling, attitudes towards self and other.
After reviewing the literatyure in this field (Jahoda, 1959; Maslow &
Mittleman, 1951; Rogers, 1961; Whitaker, 1970)
Following six popular indices of mental health were finally selected for my
work.
1. Emotional Stability
2. Over-all Adjustment
3. Autonomy
4. Security-Insecurity
5. Self-concept
6. Intelligence
1.4 TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS:Education is a tripolar process. At the one end stands the (educator)
teacher, on the second, learner, (educand) and on the third, the contain.
What transpires between the teacher and thaught is education. It basically
effects modification in the natural endowment of the child, who is the
learner. Modification as a net result or out come of education required to
factors:10
11
13
1.6 TITLE OF THE STUDY:A study the effect of Mental health on teacher effectiveness of a Govt. and
Pvt. Primary School Teachers.
14
1.9 HYPOTHESES
Following null hypotheses will be tested:1. There is no significant relationship between teaching effectiveness
and mental health of pvt. school teachers.
2. There is no significant relationship between teaching effectiveness
and mental health of govt school teachers.
3. There is no significant difference in teaching effectiveness and mental
health of govt and pvt. Primary school teachers.
4. There is no significant effect the types of institute on teaching
effectiveness.
15
5. There is no significant
effectiveness.
6. There is no significant interactional effect of the mental health and
types of institutional on teaching effectiveness of primary school
teachers.
1.12 POPULATION
The population for the present study comprises of al the teachers teaching in
Govt. & Pvt. Primary Schools of Haryana.
1.13 SAMPLE
Sample for the present study comprises of 25 Pvt. & 25 Govt.
Teachers of Ten randomly selected Govt and Pvt. Primary schools of
Faridabad, Haryana.
16
S.No.
1.
Variables
Teachers effectiveness
Tools used
Teacher effectiveness
scale developed by
Dr. Promod Kumar
2.
Mental health
inventory By Jagdish
& shirvastva
1.15 ANALYSIS OF DATA:The data has been analyzed quantitatively by using following statistical
techniques:1. Mean
2. Standard Deviation
3. T. Ratio & F. Ratio
1.16 DELIMITATION
1. The study has been confirmed to faridabad District Haryana.
17
18
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
The search for related literature is one of the important steps in the research
process. It servers as a valuable guide in defining the problems, recognizing
its significance, suggesting promising data. Its gathering devices,
appreciating study design and sources of data. Its also helps to eliminate the
duplication of what has been done and provides useful hypotheses and
helpful suggestion for significant investigation.
The researcher has made an extensive study for reviewing the related
literature. Some of the important reports of research study, related to the
problems under investigation, to which the investigator was able to the lay
hands have been placed in three different categories and are reviewed here in
this chapter in relation to three variables taken for the present study.
The variables are:
(a) Teaching Effectiveness
(b) Mental Health
WANGOO n( 1984) Studied the personality and scholastic competence of
teacher as related to their effectives. The findings revealed that the
personality, adjustment, democratic leadership, a high degree of intelligence
and emotional control are the main characteristics that go whit teacher
effectiveness.
19
SUBBARAYAN
(1985)
Studies
the
relationship
between
teacher
and female teachers, the rural and urban teachers do not differ significantly
on their adjustment was significant.
AGGARWAL (1994) investigated the teachers effectiveness sof secondary
school teachers in terms of their disciplinary parental participation and
negligence in their own childrens academic activities. The findings revealed
that the teacher effectiveness of secondary school teacher is significantly
influenced by the extreme autonomous participation as parents in their own
childrens academic activities. Both effective as well as ineffective teachers
equally render disciplinary behaviour in their children academic activities.
BISWAS AND DE TINKU (195) studied the effectiveness of secondary
school teache in Tripura. The finding revealed that only male and female
teachers differed significantly on teacher effectiveness scale. It indicated that
the teachers belonging to the open climate differs significantly from those of
the autonomous, controlled and closed climate.
RAW (1995) studied teachers effectiveness in relation to creativity and
interpersonal relationship. There as on significant relation between
effectiveness and the income or years or service of the teachers whereas
significant difference are found between rural and urban teachers with
reference to interpersonal relationships.
SAXENA (1995) Studied the teacher effectiveness in relation to adjustment,
jab satisfaction and attitude towards teaching profession. Teacher
effectiveness scale and job satisfaction questionnaires by kumar and Mutha
(1985) were used for the collection of datas, related to teacher effectiveness
and job satisfaction. The finding revealed that both effective and ineffective
21
teachers are well adjusted, revealed that both effective and ineffective
teachers are well adjusted, derive satisfaction from their work and had
favorable attitude towards teaching profession.
SHAH (1995) undertook a study the determinants of teachers effectiveness.
The finding revealed that teachers effectiveness is influenced and effective
by different -2 independent variables. These variable are significant related
with the effectiveness in teaching.
SUGIRTHAM AND KRISHAN (1995) studied the effectiveness of teachers
of girls higher secondary schools in tuticorin. It was concluded that there is
significant difference among the different classed handled by the
respondents, there is significant difference among different qualification of
respondents on teacher effectiveness.
MENDIRATTA (1999) studied the effectiveness of assistant teachers in
relation to school climate. School organization climate description
questionnaire by Halpin and croft and teachers effectiveness scale by kumar
and Mutha were used for collection of data. The finding revealed that the
effectiveness of assistant teachers is positively related to the factors of
school climate.
PANDEY AND MAIKHURI (1999) Studied the effective and ineffective
teachers sttitudes towards teaching profession with references to their age
and experience by kumar and Mutha and attitude towards teaching scale by
Katti and Bannur. The findings revealed that there is no significant
difference between effective teacher attitude is positive towards teaching
22
23
24
but
less
capable
of
establishing
constructive
significantly from the mental wealth of adolescents whose mothers are not
working. Possible causes of the results are discussed.
SINGH, HGARINAM (1989) A Study of factors influencing buen-out in
teachers.
(1) The various burn-out factors were positively related.
(2) Same of the demographic factors were related to different factors of
born-out.
SUSHANT SANDEEP VAIDYA (2000), Post graduate department of
psychology.. bhonsala military college, nashik, Maharashtra. He
worked a comparative study iof mental health of HIV infected and
non-infected individuals it was found that the HIV infected males had
better adjustment-abilities in relation to mental health than HIV
infected females, HIV non-infected females had better adjustment-the
HIV non-infected males and to mental health than HIV non-infected
individuals.
27
CHAPTER -III
THE REASEARCH DESIGN
The research design sets up the frame work for the whole study. It tell
us what observation to make, how to make how to make them and how to
analyses the quantititative representation of the observation. It suggest the
direction of observation making and analysis.
According to Johanda and cook , a research design is the arrangement
of conditions for collection and analysis of data in manner aims to combine
the relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure.
In this chapter, a brief outline of the method used in condition the
research, population ,sample , tool used , the procedure adopted for the
collection of the data along with the statiscal techniques applied is given.
3.1 THE METHOD :In accordance with the nature of present study, normative survey
method will be
used for the collection of data. The tools will be administered upon the
sample and the date will be collective the investigator.
3.2 POPULATION :The population for the present study comprises of all the teachers
teaching in Govt. & Pvt. Primary school of Haryana.
28
3.3 Description of the Population:For the efficient administration and supervision of twelve hundred
Govt. Primary School in Haryana , the Haryana Govt. has divided Haryana
in to twelve block, each block block has its block office headed by Block
Education Officer and has on an average eighty primary school mean there
about 46,500 Govt. Primary School an there about 1,16,000 Private School
in Haryana and each school have among average 5-8 teachers.
3.4 SAMPLE :Sample for the present study comprises of 25 Pvt. & 25 Govt. teachers
of ten randomly selected Govt. and Primary School of Faridabad, Haryana.
3.5 Selection of the School:For drawing about the sample the investigator proceeded the
following manner:Of the twelve block in haryana the investigator selected faridabad
block, haryana for the study.
From faridabad block , Haryana Five Govt. Primary School and Five
Pvt. Primary School selected randomly.
29
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Five teachers from each of the selected ten schools, teaching classes
from
1-5th, where choosing. Wherever there ware more then one section of any
class, only one teacher of any section was considered for the data collection.
Each teacher was administered teaching Effectiveness Scale (TEST), Mental
health (MH). Thus, in all fifty were selected for the present study.
3.5 TOOLS USED IN THE STUDY:Selection of tools is very important in any research study. If
appropriate tools are not used the investigor may be mislead and the efforts
of the invertigator would go waste as he would not be able to achieve the
objectives of the study. The following tools will be used in the present study
for the collection of the data.
Sr. No
1.
Variables
Teacher Effectiveness
2.
Jagdish
Mental Health
Tools used
Teacher Effectiveness Scale
developed by Dr. Promod Kumar
and Dr. D.N. Mutha
Mental Mealth inventory By
& Shrivastva.
30
3.6 DESCRIPTION OF THE TOOLS USED :The following tools have been used in the study.
3.6.I Teachers Effectiveness Scale
Teacher Effectiveness scale (TES) developed by kumar and Mutha
(1974). The present likert types scale has been developed for identifying
effective and ineffective teachers. The teacher effectiveness Scale (TES)
consists of 69 highly discriminating items related to eleven teaching aspects
as follows: Information Source
Motivator
Disciplinarian
Advisor and Guide
Relationship with pupils, Fellow , teachers and
Principals.
Teaching skill
Co-curricular Activities
Professional knowledge
General appearance and habits in relation to
classroom.
Classroom management
Personal Characteristics
Reliability
The split half reliability (Correlating the odd even items) the scalw,
applying the spearman- Brown firmula has been found to be 0.67.
31
Validity
For answering the items of Teacher effectiveness questionnaire there
were 5 alternative namely: Strongly Agree , Agree, undecided, Disagree and
Strangely Disagree . The respondents were asked to choose one of the
alternatives which they considered most appropriate and put a ( ) in the
space provided for it against each item.
3.6.2 MENTAL HEALTH:The concept of mental health is a old as human being. In recent years
clinical physiologists as well as educationists have started giving proper
attention to the study. To the study of mental health. How ever , in India,
relatively very few work has been conducted.
Mental health as defined by Kornhauser (1965) connotates those
behavior , Perceptions and feeling that determine a persons overall level of
personal effectiveness, success, happiness and excellence of functioning as a
person. It depends on the development and retention of goald that are
neither too high nor too low to permit realistic successful maintenance of
belie in ones self worthy, effective human-being person is firm in his
intentions and is least disturbed by strains and stresses of day-to-day life.
Thus the concepts of mental health takes a Gestalt view of the
individual. It incorporates the concepts of personality characteristics and
behavior all in one. It may also be understood as the behavioral
characteristics of the person. A mentally healthy person shows a
homogenous organization of desirable attitudes, healthy values
and
33
34
TABLE 1
Reliability Coefficient of MHB
Mean Age
Test-Retest
odd-
even
Reliability
Length)
Part 1: Emotional sability
rtt=.725
Part 2: Overall Adjustment
rtt=.871
Part 3: Autonomy
rtt=.829
Part 4: Security-Insecurity
rtt=.829
Part 5: Self-Concept
rtt=.861
Part 6: Intelligence
rtt=.892
Reliability
rtt=876
rtt=.821
1.5.6 yrs
102
rtt=.767
rtt= .826
rtt=.786
rtt=.823
35
(Whole
Validity :MHB was validated against the tests developed earlier. Part 1 of
MHB was validated against Emotional Stability test developed high school
Adjustment Inventory (HSAI) developed earlier by Singh and Sen Gupta
( 1987) and Hindi adaptions of Bells adjustment inventory by Mohsin.
Shamshad and Jehan (1967) for Part III and part V construct validity was
computed. Part IV was validated against Neuroticism Scale of MPI as
adapted by Jalota & Kapoor (1975) like, Part VI was validated against
Jalota Group General Mental ability Test(1976). Only relevant parts of MHB
with suitable criteria were given to the random sample of 12. the standard
instructions of the test criteria were followed. The details are given in table
2.
TABLE 2
Validity co-efficient of MHB
Part of MHB N
Concurrent Validity Parts of MHB
Construct Validity
Part I : ES
.673*
Part II:QA
Part III:SI 102
.704*
Part III
:AY
.681*
Part IV: IG
Part V :SC
.821*
.823*
*P< .01.
36
102
.601*
All the 69 items of the scale are positively worded. Each items
alternative is assigned a weight ranging from [ Strongly agree (5) ]
Agree (4) undecided (3), Disagree (2), strongly disagree (1) to 1. The
teaching effectiveness score of a subject is the sum total of item scores of the
items. The theoretical range of scores is from 69 to 345 with the higher score
indicating the greater degree of effectiveness.
SECTION-B
The answer of those times (in each part) which tally with the answers given
in the scoring key would be given a score if +1. If they dont tally they will
be given a score of zero.
37
ANALYSIS OF DATA
The data has been analyzed quantitatively by using following statistical
techniques.
MEAN OF AVERAGE
It is the sum of all observations divided by the total number of observations
with the help of mean we can analyze that whether the performance of an
individual is above average of below average:
Mathematically it is intercepted as
X=
X/N
X = denotes mean
X = Sum of observations
38
N= No. of Observations
ii) Standard Deviation
It is used to find the degree of dispersion of items from the central value.
SD.
X- denotes deviation from the actual mean denotes standard deviation.
N = denotes No. of observations.
iii) Correlation:
The co-efficient of correlation is that one ratio which express the extent to
which changes in one variable are accompanied by or are dependent upon
changes in the other variable.
For the present study the investigator has computed co-efficient of
correlation using persons product moment method.
R = XY/ X2. Xy2
Which X and Y are the deviations from the actual mean and X 2 an X2 the
sums of the squred deviation in the X and Y taken from two mean.
39
TEST:- t test for measuring the significance of difference was also used the
following formula was used for the purpose:
T = D/SED
(Where ) D = > Difference between two means.
SED- = > Standard error of mean difference
Now SED
S1 = > Standard deviation of first sample group.
N1= > Total no. of frequencies of first sample group.
S2= > Standard deviationof second sample group.
N2= > Total no. of frequencies of second sample group.
F- TEST
The analysis of variance is an important method of dividing the variation
observed in experimental situation into different part each part assignable to
know source, cause of factor. This method is devised by R.A. Fisher in 1928.
It is also know as F-test, the F stands for fisher. This F-test on analysis of
variance method is an improvement over t test. The t test is used for a
ascertaining the significance of difference of two means while F-test is used
for testing the significance of difference more than two means
simultaneously. The t test evaluates the significance of difference between
variances only while F-test examines both between or among variance as
well as within variances. The analysis of variances is associated with the
40
design of experiments. Since R.A. Fisher time it has found wide application
in many areas of experimentation.
F-TEST as improvement over t test:The t test is used for evaluation the significance of the difference between
two means. It this type of test between variance of two means is taken into
consideration only. The difference between two group may be attributable to
within variance not only by between variances.
Advantages of Analysis of variances technique:This statistical technique has the following advantage in research and
measurement.
(1) It is an improved technique over the t test or z-test. It evaluates both
types of variance between and within.
(2) This technique is used for ascereral group of treatment at a time. It is
an economical device.
(3) It involves more than one independent variance in studying the main
effects and interaction effects.
(4) The experiemental designs-simple random design and levels x
treatment designs are based on two way analysis of variance
technique.
(5) It t is not significant, F-test must be followed to analysis the
difference between two means. It may be due to with in variance
difference.
41
Formula of F-ratio
F = MSB/MSW
Where
MSB = > Mean sum of square between group.
MSW= > Mean sum of square within group.
42
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS AND INTERPERTATION OF THE DATA
The data as such has no meaning unless these are analyzed and
interpreted. Analysis of the data means studying the tabulated material in
order to determine the inherent facts or meaning. It involves breaking up of
complex factor into simplest part and putting them in new arrangement for
the purpose of interpretations. The analysis helps the investigator to interpret
the data correctly and precisely and to draw conclusion.
Statistical operations are a major bid for the data analysis and
interpretation. Robert Burgers defines the utility of statistics as follows: the
fundamental goal of statistics is to push back the domain of ignorance,
prejudice, rule of thumb, arbitrary and pre-mature decision, traditions and
dogmatism and to increase the domain in which decisions and principles are
formulated on the basis of analyzed quantitative facts.
There is large number of statistical procedure that one can use
to analyze the data. For the present study also the investigator has use a
number for statically measure namely, mean, weight mean, standard
deviation and co-efficient correlation for analyzing the data obtained from
the administration of in ht present chapter and interpretation has been
presented in three parts as follows :Part 1:-
effectiveness and mental health of the Govt. and Pvt. Primary School
teachers.
43
Part 2:-
teaching effectiveness and mental health of the Govt. and Pvt. Primary
School teachers.
Part 3:-
Pvt. School
B)
Govt. School
Mental Health
Poor mental Health
44
Teachers
Private School Teacher
Good Mental
Mental
Health
Poor Mental
Good Mental
Health
Health
Poor
Health
PART- I
LEVEL OF TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS AND MENTAL HEALTH
PVT. AND GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS:
4.1 LEVEL OF TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS OF PVT. AND GOVT.
PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS:
Objective 1st To study the level of teaching effectiveness of Pvt. And
Govt. Primary school teachers.
For finding the level of teaching effectiveness of Pvt. And
Pvt. Primary School teacher, means & Standard Deviation were
calculated value are shown in the table(1).
45
TABLE (1)
Level of teaching effectiveness of Pvt. And Govt. primary school
teacher:
Sr. no
1
Variable
Teaching
Effectiveness
Mean
S.D
A.
Govt. Teachers
25
340
16.27
B.
Pvt.. Teachers
25
312
19.84
From the table (1), IT May be Percived that the mean score of Pvt.
And Govt. Primary School teachers for the variable effectiveness is
312 & 340and S.D is 19.84 &16.27, it may interpreated that the level
of effectiveness of the teaching effectiveness on the Govt. and Pvt.
Primary School teachers it above average. It implies that the Govt.
and Pvt. Primary School teachers are effective, in their task of
teaching and related aspects.
For further analysis of the data related to effectiveness, in accordance
withindividual scores of the respondents on the variable,
The teachers were classified in fie different catogaries, namely, very
effective, effective, average, ineffective and very ineffective
46
Table (2)
The distribution of pvt. Primary school teacher, according to their teaching
effectiveness
Sr.
Categories of Effectiveness
Number
of Percentage
No.
pvt. Teachers of teachers
1
Very Effective
20`
80
2
Effective
04
16
3
Average
01
04
4
Ineffective
00
00
5
Very ineffective
00
00
FIG. 1 : Pie-diagram showing the distribution of pvt. Primary school
Teachers. According to their Teaching Effectiveness.
47
TABLE 3
The Distribution of Govt. Primary School teachers, according to their
teaching effectiveness
Sr.
Categories of Effectiveness
Number
of Percentage
No.
pvt. Teachers of teachers
1
Very Effective
25
100
2
Effective
00
00
3
Average
00
00
4
Ineffective
00
00
5
Very ineffective
00
00
FIG. 2: Ple-Diagram Showing the Distribution of Govt.Primary School
Teaches. According to their teaching Effectiveness.
4.2 LEVEL OF MENTAL HEALTH OF GOVT. AND PVT. PRIMARY
SCHOOL TEACHERSObjective (2) : To study the level of mental health Pvt. And Govt. Primary
School teachers.
For finding the level of mental health of pvt. And Govt. primary school
teacher, mean and standard deviation were calculated were calculated. The
calculated value are shown in the table.4.
48
Table (4)
Variable
N
Mental Health
Mean
S.D
Govt.
Teachers
25
93
7.48
Pvt. Teachers
25
89
8.30
From the tabl;e (4) it may be perelved that the mean score of pvt. And Govt.
Primary School teacher for the variable mental health is 89 & 93 and S.D is
8.30 & 7.48 it may be interpreted that the level of mental health of the pvt.
And Govt. Primary school teacher is above average.
It implies that the Govt. and Pvt. Teachers working in Pvt. And Govt. School
are effective, in their task of mental health and related aspects.
For further analysis of the data related to mental health in accordance with
individual score of the respondent on the variable bwlow p50-poor and
above p50-good.
49
TAVLE (5)
THIS DISTRIBUTION OF PVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER
ACCORDING TO THEIR MENTAL HEALTH.
Sr. No.
Level of
Mental health
1.
Good Mental
Health
2.
Poor Mental
health
No. of Pvt.
Primary
school teacher
12
Percentage of
teacher
13
52
48
Level of
Mental health
1.
Good Mental
Health
2.
Poor Mental
health
No. of Govt .
Primary
school teacher
13
Percentage of
teacher
12
48
52
From the table (6) , it is found that our of 25 Govt. Primary School Teachers
13 have good mental health and 12 have poor mental health.
50
PART-II
4.3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS AND
MENTAL HEALTH.
Objective (3) :- To study the relationship between teaching effectiveness and
mental health.
To test the hypothesis the co-efficient of correlation was computed Between
teaching effectiveness and mental health. Scores using product moment
method. The calculated value is shown in the table.
TABLE (7)
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS AND
MENTAL HEALTH OF GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.
.
Sr. No.
Variable
Mean
S.D
rTE & M
2.
Mental Health 25
(Govt.)
mental
Health
(Govt.)
25
340
16.27
0.834
93
7.48
(S)*
TABLE (8)
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS AND
MENTAL HEALTH OF PVT. PRIMARYY SCHOOL TEACHERS.
Sr. No.
Variable
Mean
S.D
rTE & M
2.
Teaching
Effectiveness
(Pvt.)
(mental
Health (Pvt.)
25
312
19.84
0.751
25
89
8.30
(S)*
52
PART-III
4.4 (1) TO COMPARE THE MANTAL HEALTH OF PVT. AND GOVT.
PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.
Objective (4) :To compare the mantel health of pvt. And Govt. primary School teachers.
N
TABLE (9)
Mean
S.D
Sr.
No.
1
Variable
r-
(A)
Pvt.
25
84
8.30
2.015
(B)
Govt.
25
93
93
7.48
Significant
TE & M
Mental Health
Significant
From the table (9), it is clear that t value is significant. Hence the null
Hypotheses that the is no significant difference in mental Health of Govt.
and Pvt. Primary School Teachers is rejected and it is conclude that there is
exist difference between the Mental Health of Govt. and Pvt. Primary School
Teachers.
(2) To COMPARE THE TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS OF PVT. AND
GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.
OBJECTIVE (4) :- To compare the teaching effectiveness of Pvt. And Govt.
school teachers.
53
TABLE (10)
Sr.
No.
1
Variable
Mean
S.D
r-
(A)
Pvt.
25
312
19.84 4.006
(B)
Govt.
25
340
16.27
Significant
TE & M
Teaching
Effectiveness
Significant
From the table (10), it is clear that T value is significant. Hence the null
Hypotheses that there is no significant difference in Teaching Effectiveness
of Govt. and Pvt. Primary School Teachers is rejected and it is conclude that
there is exit difference between the Teaching Effectiveness of Govt. and Pvt.
Primary school Teachers .
PART-IV
4.5 STUDY OF MEAN DIFFERNCE IN TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
SCORE IN RELATION TO MENTAL HEALTH AND TYPES OF
INSTITUTIONAL
Objectives:to study the effect of types of institution on teaching effectiveness of
teachers.
Sources
Types of
DF
S.S
M.S
Significant`
120813.16
120813.16
204.47
S*
institution
(A) Teaching (2-1) =1
Effectiveness
(b) Mental
(2-1) = 1
116343.26
116343.26
196.90
S*
health
AXB
(2-1)
119495.56
119495.56
202.23
S*
117660.86
27144
39220.29
590.87
66.38
-
S*
-
(2-1)
Between
Within
=1x1=1
(4-1) =3
46
1). From table (11),it is clear that caluclauted value of F to study the main
effct of A, i.e. type of institution on teaching effectiveness is significant at
both levels. Hence null hypotheses there is no significant effect the type of
institution on teaching effectuveness is rejected and it is concluded that type
of institution has effect on teaching effectiveness.
2) From table (11), it is clear that calculated value of F to study the main
effect of B, i..e. Mental health on teaching effectiveness is significant
55
56
CHAPTER (V)
SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS
The teacher Is not an instructor or taskmaster, he is a helper and a guide. His
business is to suggest and not to impose. He does not actually train the
pupils mind, he only shows him to perfect his instruments of knowledge and
helps and encourages him in the process. He does not impart knowledge to
him, he shows how to acquire knowledge for himself. He does not call forth
the knowledge that is within, he only show him where it lies and how it can
habituated to rise to the surface.
Teachers cooupy a palace of paramount importance in any system of
education and hold a great responsibility of shaping the destiny of the
nation. This is the reason that at times teachers are called social engineers.
Infact, the quality of school education is the direct consequences and
out come of the quality of teachers as whatever policies may be laid down in
the ultimate. Analysis they have to be interpreted and implemented by
teachers a such through teaching learning process. Thus an effective or
efficient teacher is amongst the foremost factor contributing to educational
refinement and improvement. It is the teacher around whom the whole
system of education resolves.
The importance of teacher in the educational process is unquestionable. How
ever, he entire edifice of education is shaky if the teacher is weak and
ineffective. An effective teacher is amongst the foremost factors contributing
to educational improvement which we are trying hard to achieve. There is
57
59
60
61
62
5.7 HYPOTHESES
Following null hypotheses will be tested:1. There is no significant relationship between teaching effectiveness
and mental health of Pvt. School teachers.
2. There is no significant relationship between teaching effectiveness
and mental health of Govt School teachers.
3. There is not significant relationship between teaching effectiveness
and mental health teachers. There is no significant effect the types of
institution on teaching effectiveness.
4. There is no significant effect of mental health on teaching
effectiveness.
5. There is no significant interactional effect of the mental health and
types of institutional on teaching effectiveness of primary school
teachers.
5.10 POPULATION
The population for the present study comprises of all the teachers teaching in
Govt & Pvt. Primary Schools of Haryana.
5.11 SAMPLE
Sample for the present study comprises of 25 Pvt. & 25 Govt teacher of Ten
randomly selected Govt and Pvt. Primary Schools of Faridabad, Haryana.
5.15 TOOLS USED IN THE STUDY
Selection of tools is very important in any research study. If appropriated
tools are not used the investigator may be mislead and the efforts of the
investigators would go waste as he would not be able to achieve the
objectives of the study. The following tools will be used in the present study
for the collection of the data.
Sr. No.
1.
Variables
Teacher Effectiveness
Tools used
Teacher Effectiveness
Scale developed by
Dr. Parmod kumar and
Dr. D.N. Mutha.
2.
Mental health
Mental health
Inventory By
Jagdish & Shrivastva
65
5.13 DELIMITAION
1. The study has been confirmed to Faridabad block, Haryana.
2. The study has been further confined to 25 Teacher of Govt. School of
Faridabad.
3. The study has been further confirmed to 25 Teachers of Pvt. School of
Faridabad.
4. The study is delimited to 3 variables teacher effective and Mental
health and types of school. (Pvt. & Govt. School)
67
EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS:Educated nation is a progressive nation. The onus of educated nation lies
on its teacher . The responsibility of the teaching work force is to
transplant the best in him to the pupil in order to make him a better
human being , who can suitably fit himself to social cultural in lieu of
the country . A teacher who can it more usefully can claim to be an
effective teacher and who fails to do is little consideration as such.
Such act of Effectiveness can be expected only from a mentally healty. A
Mentally Healty teacher is capable of delivering his duties and
responsibilities in a more effective manner.
Mental Health is taken as an expression of Mentally healthy Individuals
helps perception of one job fulfilling or allowing the fulfillment of ones
important job values provides these value are compatible with ones
needs.
Types of institution present an environment to work. A Healthy
environment is required for efficiency in a particular work. So level of
Teaching Effectiveness varies with the type of institution.
Teaching Effectiveness depends upon his will and ability to drive
teaching Effectiveness is the result of his working at optimum level
Mental Health is Healthy environment.
So, and expect experienced an effective teacher is who has the developed
solution for common class from problems . Then Knowledge of Teaching
process and contained is exclusives and well organized, Who is
motivated and satisfied and to do his work and job.
68
69