Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Outline
Ricardo A. Sunga III2
ricardo_sunga@yahoo.com
FUNDAMENTAL POWERS OF THE STATE
A.
POLICE POWER
1.
2.
3.
Scope
a.
generally
b.
particular aspects
4.
(1)
public health
(2)
public morals
(3)
public safety
(4)
public welfare
Limitations
a.
general
b.
due process
c.
equal protection
Cases:
U.S. v. Toribio, 15 Phil. 85 (1910)
Fabie v. City of Manila, 21 Phil., 486 (1912)
5.
b.
6.
7.
Legislature
2.
Executive
Cases:
Republic Planters Bank v. Ogano, 269 SCRA 1 (1997)
Telecommunications & Broadcast Attorneys of the
Phils .v. COMELEC, 189 SCRA 337 (1998)
B.
EMINENT DOMAIN
1.
Concept
2.
3.
4.
Taking
Cases:
City of Manila v. Laguio, 455 SCRA 308 (2005)
CIR v. Central Luzon Drug Corporation, 406 SCRA 414
(2005)
5.
Public use
Case:
Maosca v. RP, 252 SCRA 412 (1997)
6.
Just compensation
Cases:
Land Bank v. Wycoco, January 13, 2004
Republic v. Lim, 462 SCRA 265 (2005)
C.
TAXATION
1.
2.
3.
Limitations
4.
Double Taxation
5.
6.
Tax exemptions
Cases:
BILL OF RIGHTS
2.
3.
Notice
Impartiality
People v. Tee, 395 SCRA 419 (2003)
Tumey v. Ohio 373 US 510 (1927)
5.
Certainty
Void for vagueness
Cases:
Connally v. Gen. Construction Co., 269 US 385 (1926)
Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 US 451 (1939)
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, Nov. 19,
2001
Overbreadth
Cases:
Shelton v. Tucker, 364 US 479 (1960)
D34
City of Manila v. Laguio, 455 SCRA 308 (2005)
6.
Equal Protection
Cases:
Beltran v. Secretary of Health, 476 SCRA 168 (2005)
City of Manila v. Laguio, 455 SCRA 308 (2005)
Administrative warrant
Cases:
Harvey v. Defensor-Santiago, 162 SCRA 840 (1988)
Lucien Tran Van Nghia v. Liwag, 175 SCRA 318 (1989)
Jackson v. Macalino, G.R. No. 139255, November 24,
2003
3.
Warrantless search
Incident to lawful arrest
Cases:
People v. Pangilinan, 410 SCRA 394 (2003)
People v. Estella, 395 SCRA 553 (2003)
Routinary searches at airports
People v. Johnson, GR No 138881, December 18, 2000
People v. Canton, GR No 148825, December 27, 2002
Moving vehicles
Asuncion v. CA, 302 SCRA 490 (1999)
Caballes v. CA, 373 SCRA 221 (2002)
Stop and Frisk
People v. Binad Sy Chua, 396 SCRA 657 (2003)
R
Objects in Plain View
People v. Simbahon, 401 SCRA 94 (2003)
People v. Go, 411 SCRA 81 (2003)
5.
Cases:
Forbes v. Chuoco Tiaco and Crossfield, 16 Phil. 534
(1910)
Chuoco Tiaco v. Forbes, 40 Phil. 1122 (1913)
Aberca v. Ver, 160 SCRA 590 (1988)
c.
Forms of abridgment
1.
2.
kinds
d.
Tests
1.
2.
3.
e.
Dangerous tendency
Clear and present danger
Balancing of interests
Prior restraint
Cases:
MTRCB v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation, 448
SCRA 575 (2005)
U.S. v. OBrien 391 US 367 (1968)
f.
Subsequent punishment
Cases:
Gitlow v. People of New York, 268 US 652 (1924)
Dennis v. United States, 341 US 494 (1950)
New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, 376 US 254 (1964)
Espuelas v. People, 90 Phil. 524 (1951)
g.
Cases:
Philippine Journalists v. Thoen, 477 SCRA 482 (2005)
Reno v. ACLU, 521 US 844 (1997)
h.
justice
Cases:
Case:
Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica
Foundation, 438 US 726, 57 L Ed 2d 1073, 98 S Ct
3026 (1978)
2.
1985
Cases:
Subayco v. Sandiganbayan, 260 SCRA 798 (1996)
Bangalisan v. CA, 276 SCRA 619 (1997)
Acosta v. CA, 334 SCRA 486 (2000)
Non-establishment of religion
Art. VI, Sec. 28(3)
Art. VI, Sec. 1(2)
Art. IV, Sec. 14(3)
Cases:
Garces v. Estenzo, 104 SCRA 510 (1981)
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 US 601 (1971)
Board of Education v. Allen, 392 US 236 (1968)
2.
Cases:
Estrada v. Escritor, 408 SCRA 1 (2003) see also: June
22, 2006 decision
Taruc v. De la Cruz, 453 SCRA 123 (2005)
In Re: Request of Muslim Employees in the Different
Court of Iligan City, 477 SCRA 648 (2005)
Cases:
Gonzales v. Narvasa, 337 SCRA 732 (2001)
Chavez v. PEA, 384 SCRA 152 (2002)
Cases:
People v. Besonia, 422 SCRA 710 (2004)
Uy v. Phela Trading Company, 451 SCRA 124 (2005)
1.1 Prosecutions burden to prove warnings
Case:
People v. Nicandro, 141 SCRA 289 (1986)
R
1.2 Police line-up
Case:
People v. Escordial, 373 SCRA 585 (2002)
People v Piedad, GR No 131923, December 5, 2002
1.3 Requirements for warnings to be valid
Cases:
People v. Obrero, 332 SCRA 190 (2000)
People v. Alberto, GR No 132374, 22 August 2002
2.
Cases:
People v. Patungan, 354 SCRA 413 (2001)
People v. Ochate, GR No 127154, 30 July 2002
ii)
Cases:
People v. Encipido, 146 SCRA 478 (1988)
People v. Moises Marcos, 147 SCRA 204 (1987)
v)
3.
Case:
Government of the U.S.A. v. Purganan, G.R. No.
148571, Sept. 25, 2002
5.5 Standards for fixing bail
Rule 114 Sec. 10
Cases:
Cabanero v. Canon, A.M. No. MTJ-01-369, September
20, 2001
Magsucang v. Balgos, 398 SCRA 158 (2003)
Impartial tribunal
Cases:
People v. Tuazon, 159 SCRA 315 (1988)
Cojuangco v. PCGG, 190 SCRA 226 (1990)
2.
Presumption of innocence
Cases:
Delgado v. CA, 145 SCRA 357 (1986)
Ong v. Sandiganbayan, 470 SCRA 7 (2005)
Rule 119, Sec. 3(e)
Case:
People v. Quintal, 125 SCRA 734 (1983)
3.
Case:
People v. Macarang, 424 SCRA 18 (2004)
Crisostomo v. Sandiganbayan, 456 SCRA 45 (2005)
4.
Filing of demurrer to evidence is a waiver of right
to be heard (Rule 119, Sec. 5)
Case:
People v. Donesa, 49 SCRA 281 (1973)
Abriol v. Homeres, 84 Phil.525 (1949)
Rule 119, Sec. 15
Right to be informed of nature and cause of accusation
Cases:
People v. Sanchez, 411 SCRA 288 (2003)
People v. Ting Lan Uy, 457 SCRA 248 (2005)
5.
6.
2004
7.
8.
Trial in absentia
Rule 115, Sec. 1(c)
Cases:
People v. Salas, 143 SCRA 163 (1986)
Jimenez v. Nazareno, 160 SCRA 1 (1988)
9.
Cases:
Aquino, Jr. v. Military Commission No. 2, 63 SCRA 546
(1975)
Case:
Chavez v. CA, 24 SCRA 663 (1968)
iv)
PRESCRIBED REFERENCE