Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Object 1
SOLOMON: Well, the accusation against Jeffrey Sterling as a former CIA officer
is largely under the Espionage Act, which is a misuse of that 1917 law. And
the charge is that he provided documents and information that has been
called classified by the CIA to New York Times reporter James Risen for a book
he wrote that was published in the year 2006 called State of War. And it was
about a flawed plan, really, implemented by the CIA for negatively
constructed or falsely constructed diagrams to the Iranian government for a
nuclear weapon. So it was a botched plan. It was both dumb and dangerous.
And the CIA and the Justice Department are now pursuing the prosecution of
him. He could face many years in prison.
PERIES: Now, you have mounted a campaign saying whistleblowers are, you
know, in the interest of--public interest should not fear this, basically. Now,
when one joins--I guess what's in everyone's mind is, when one joins the CIA,
one is sworn to secrecy and for protecting national secrets. So when does a
employee sort of cross the line and start defending public interest instead of
interest of the department?
SOLOMON: Well, if you're an employee of the CIA or the NSA or the Pentagon
or State Department, you take an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution of the United States, and that is your first loyalty, or should be.
And as in the case of Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Chelsea
Manning with her revelations, as well as many other whistleblowers,
including Edward Snowden, it's important to recognize that the higher loyalty
is to truth and to the Constitution and to the informed consent of the
governed. It's really not possible to have meaningful democracy if the public,
the people don't know what is being done in their names with their tax
dollars.
In this case it was highly dangerous what the CIA did. And I should emphasize
that Jeffrey Sterling, as the defendant, is not acknowledging that any of the
accusations in the indictment are true. He is not in any way stating that he
was a source for James Risen for this chapter in his book that provided
classified information. But no one disputes--and that includes Mr. Sterling--no
one disputes that he went to the Senate Intelligence Committee staff and
provided them with information about this operation by the CIA, and now 15
years old. And that alone, and significantly, makes him a whistleblower.
He went through channels. And part of the very vicious activity of the U.S.
government in oppressing whistleblowers, and in fact freedom of the press, is
that despite what we hear about how people should go through channels and
can go through channels meaningfully, when people do that who work at
agencies like the NSA and CIA, they are snared and trapped, and then later
pursued, and in some cases, as in this one, prosecuted. So he is a
whistleblower, no matter whether the indictment is true or false, and Jeffrey
Sterling should be defended as such.
As you mentioned, there is a petition urging the Justice Department to drop
all charges against Jeffrey Sterling launched by RootsAction.org, many
supporting organizations, and people are very much invited to sign and
circulate that petition.
PERIES: Now, one of the things that the public is quite unaware of is the kind
of pressure somebody like Jeffrey Sterling is under. Could you describe sort of
what's going on in his case and the pressure he might be feeling at this time?
SOLOMON: It's a key point, because the prosecution has as its target not only
Jeffrey Sterling, but any would-be whistleblower in the CIA and other such
agencies. It has to be extremely difficult for anyone--and Mr. Sterling is in his
mid-late 40s now--anyone to look at the prospect of decades in prison
accused of doing something that, according to the government and quite a
large proportion of the media, is against the interests of the United States.
I think in this case, as is so routinely the case in whistleblower issues, in fact
the opposite is true, that the whistleblower acts in the interests of
democracy, in the interests of the people of the United States, although
against the interests of the ruling elites who run agencies like the CIA. But
the dominant view of the powerbrokers in government is the opposite, and
they're able to threaten the very freedom of Jeffrey Sterling in this case.
PERIES: So we know what happens to people under this kind of pressure.
Aaron Swartz, for example, ends up committing suicide, Edward Snowden is
exiled in Russia, and Chelsea Manning went through a horrid public trial of his
personal life. And Jeffrey Sterling is likely up for that kind of scrutiny as well.
Now the campaign you have mounted, obviously, is gaining momentum.
What do you expect will be its passage?
SOLOMON: Well, I think that the momentum is going to escalate in the next
couple of weeks. At ExposeFacts.org, we're providing extraordinary, I think,
daily coverage, beginning January 12, of the trial, which is expected to run
DISCLAIMER: Please note that transcripts for The Real News Network are
typed from a recording of the program. TRNN cannot guarantee their
complete accuracy.
Posted by Thavam