Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
aims
include
accelerating economic
growth, social
progress, sociocultural
evolution among its members, protection of regional peace and stability, and opportunities for
member countries to discuss differences peacefully.
ASEAN covers a land area of 4.46 million km, which is 3% of the total land area of Earth,
and has a population of approximately 600 million people, which is 8.8% of the world's
population. The sea area of ASEAN is about three times larger than its land counterpart. In
2012, its combined nominal GDP had grown to more than US$2.3 trillion. If ASEAN were a
single entity, it would rank as the sixth largest economy in the world, behind the US, China,
India, Japan and Germany.
In 2008, ASEAN members adopted the ASEAN Charter, which overhauled its management
structure, and officially created ASEAN as a legal entity and established several institutional
bodies, such as the bi-annual ASEAN Summit, the ASEAN Coordinating Council and the
ASEAN Community Council. The ASEAN Secretariat, located in Jakarta, Indonesia, and led
by the secretary-general, coordinates the work plans, projects and meetings of ASEANassociated bodies. The ASEAN Secretariat is also responsible for coordinating ASEANs
relationship with external partners, such as Canada.
History
The fundamental forces driving greater economic integration in East Asia included the forces
of economic expansion, geographical proximity, web of business network, and lower
transportation and transaction costs among countries in the region. Japan's emergence as a
world economic power, the reduction of the American presence in the region following the
Vietnam War (1973), and the subsequent Vietnamese aggressions in Indochina also played a
role.
During the 1960s, there were repeated unsuccessful attempts to create an association among
Southeast Asian nations. The Association of Southeast Asia (ASA) composed of Malaya, the
Philippines, and Thailand, was established in Bangkok on July 31, 1961. Originally, the
Philippines and Malaya had sought an organization similar to the European Economic
Community, but they assented to Thailand who insisted on an association with a looser
structure. Indonesia, as a supporter of nonalignment, did not wish to join an organization that
was either too strong in its political stance or which Indonesia had no role in creating. A new
organization was required.
Maphilindo, a combined name of Malaya, the Philippines, and Indonesia, was formally
established on July 1963. Maphilindo did not work well due to different interests of the
participating nations; The Philippines and Indonesia had territorial disagreement with Malaya.
Consequently, Maphilindo failed mainly because of military disputes.
There was the SEATO, or the South East Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO). It was an
international organization for defensive collaboration established on September 8, 1954. It
also failed due to lack of agreement because it required unanimity in order to pursue a policy
or express a stance on an issue. There were several other organizations such as the Asian
Pacific Council (ASPAC), or the Southeast Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
(SAARC), none of which were successful.
The division between countries, deprivation of diplomatic relations, and continuous political
disputes outweighed regional coordination. These issues stemmed from colonial times when
they were forced by the colonial powers to live without contact from neighbouring countries.
The era called for a new, effective organization, but many countries were sceptical about each
organization. ASEAN, when it was first created, was no exemption to the doubt.
On 8 August 1967, five leaders - the Foreign Ministers of Indonesia, Malaysia, the
Philippines, Singapore and Thailand - sat down together in the main hall of the Department of
Foreign Affairs building in Bangkok, Thailand and signed a document. By virtue of that
document, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was born. The five Foreign
Ministers who signed it - Adam Malik of Indonesia, Narciso R. Ramos of the Philippines, Tun
Abdul Razak of Malaysia, S. Rajaratnam of Singapore, and Thanat Khoman of Thailand would subsequently be hailed as the Founding Fathers of probably the most successful intergovernmental organization in the developing world today. And the document that they signed
would be known as the ASEAN Declaration.
The motivations for the birth of ASEAN were so that its members governing elite could
concentrate on nation building, the common fear of communism, reduced faith in or mistrust
of external powers in the 1960s, and a desire for economic development.
The block grew when Brunei Darussalam became the sixth member on 8 January 1984,
barely a week after gaining independence on 1 January.
On 28 July 1995, Vietnam became the seventh member. Laos and Myanmar (Burma) joined
two years later on 23 July 1997. Cambodia was to have joined together with Laos and Burma,
but was deferred due to the country's internal political struggle. The country later joined on 30
April 1999, following the stabilisation of its government.
During the 1990s, the bloc experienced an increase in both membership and drive for further
integration. In 1990, Malaysia proposed the creation of an East Asia Economic
Caucus comprising the then members of ASEAN as well as the People's Republic of China,
Japan, and South Korea, with the intention of counterbalancing the growing influence of the
United States in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and in the Asian region as a
whole. This proposal failed, however, because of heavy opposition from the United States and
Japan. Despite this failure, member states continued to work for further integration
and ASEAN Plus Three was created in 1997.
In 1992, the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme was signed as a schedule
for phasing tariffs and as a goal to increase the regions competitive advantage as a
production base geared for the world market. This law would act as the framework for
the ASEAN Free Trade Area. After the East Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, a revival of the
Malaysian proposal was established in Chiang Mai, known as the Chiang Mai Initiative,
which calls for better integration between the economies of ASEAN as well as the ASEAN
Plus Three countries (China, Japan, and South Korea).
Aside from improving each member state's economies, the bloc also focused on peace and
stability in the region. On 15 December 1995, the Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free
Zone Treaty was signed with the intention of turning Southeast Asia into a Nuclear-WeaponFree Zone. The treaty took effect on 28 March 1997 after all but one of the member states
have ratified it. It became fully effective on 21 June 2001, after the Philippines ratified it,
effectively banning all nuclear weapons in the region.
Brunei
Cambodia
Indonesia
Laos
Bandar Seri
Begawan
Brunei dollar
(BND)
Phnom Penh
Cambodian riel
(KHR)
Jakarta
Indonesian rupiah
(IDR)
Vientiane
Official
languages
Leaders
Accession
Malay
Khmer
Head of
State: Norodom
Apr 30, 1999
Sihamoni Head of
Government: Hun Sen
Jan 7, 1984
Indonesian
Aug 8, 1967
Lao
Head of
State: Choummaly
Sayasone Head of
Government:
Thongsing
Thammavong
Aug 8, 1967
Malaysia
Kuala
Lumpur
Malaysian ringgit
(MYR)
Malay
Myanmar
Naypyidaw
Myanmar kyat
(MMK)
Burmese
Philippines
Manila
Philippine peso
(PHP)
Filipino,
English
Singapore
Singapore dollar
(SGD)
Malay,
Chinese,
English,
Tamil
Aug 8, 1967
Thai
Head of
State: Bhumibol
Adulyadej Head of
Government:
Yingluck Shinawatra
Aug 8, 1967
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam
Bangkok
Hanoi
Vietnamese
(VND)
Vietnamese
5. Overall Improvements:
To collaborate more effectively for the greater utilisation of their agriculture and
industries, the expansion of their trade, including the study of the problems of
international commodity trade, the improvement of their transportation and
communications facilities and the raising of the living standards of their peoples
6. Studies :
To promote Southeast Asian studies.
7. Cooperation:
To maintain close and beneficial cooperation with existing international and regional
organisations with similar aims and purposes, and explore all avenues for even closer
cooperation among themselves.
With the entry into force of the ASEAN Charter, ASEAN will henceforth operate under a
new legal framework and establish a number of new organs to boost its community-building
process.In effect, the ASEAN Charter has become a legally binding agreement among the 10
ASEAN Member States. It will also be registered with the Secretariat of the United Nations,
pursuant to Article 102, Paragraph 1 of the Charter of the United Nations.
The importance of the ASEAN Charter can be seen in the following contexts:
ASEAN Communities
The three pillars of the ASEAN Community, namely the ASEAN Political-Security
Community (APSC), the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) and the ASEAN SocioCultural Community (ASCC), are the most crucial areas deemed necessary for the progress
and evolution of ASEAN and its peoples.
9
Human rights seem to underpin all the three pillars of the ASEAN Community although they
may not be explicitly stated in the objectives, strategies or actions of the Blueprints. As
human rights encompass the principles of non-discrimination, equity, justice and human
dignity, it is therefore logical that human rights are directly or indirectly are pertinent to the
ASEAN Community. For instance, todays economic advancement depends heavily on human
resources and unless people have equal access to education, training and capacity building,
the country may be deprived of a large pool of creative thinkers and entrepreneurs. Therefore,
although human rights have much fewer mentions in the ASEAN Economic Community than
the other two pillars, nevertheless, human rights are at the heart of the ASEAN Economic
Community. This is indicated by the adoption of region of equitable economic development
as one of the four objectives of the ASEAN Economic Community.
ASEAN Member states are cognizant that in building a people-oriented, sharing and caring,
and rules-based ASEAN community through the ASEAN Political-Security Community, the
ASEAN Economic Community and the ASEAN Socio-cultural Community, the pertinence of
human rights cannot be ignored. However, the test is in the realization of the strategic
objectives through the actions articulated in the Blueprints by member states. The extent to
which the human rights-related objectives are achievable is difficult to predict because for
objectives such as equitable access requires change in mindset and commitment of member
states.
10
ASEAN Member states are cognizant that in building a people-oriented, sharing and caring,
and rules-based ASEAN community through the ASEAN Political-Security Community, the
ASEAN Economic Community and the ASEAN Socio-cultural Community, the pertinence of
human rights cannot be ignored. However, the test is in the realization of the strategic
objectives through the actions articulated in the Blueprints by member states. The extent to
which the human rights-related objectives are achievable is difficult to predict because for
objectives such as equitable access requires change in mindset and commitment of member
states.
To concretise the ASEAN Vision 2020, the ASEAN Heads of States/Governments adopted the
Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II) in 2003, which establishes an ASEAN
Community by 2020.
At the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore, the ASEAN Heads of States/Governments signed
the ASEAN Charter, which marked as ASEAN Member States commitment in intensifying
community building through enhanced regional cooperation and integration. In line with this,
they tasked their Ministers and officials to draft the APSC Blueprint, which would be adopted
at the 14th ASEAN Summit.
The APSC Blueprint is guided by the ASEAN Charter and the principles and purposes
contained therein. The APSC Blueprint builds on the ASEAN Security Community Plan of
Action, the Vientiane Action Programme (VAP), as well as relevant decisions by various
ASEAN Sectoral Bodies. The ASEAN Security Community Plan of Action is a principled
document, laying out the activities needed to realise the objectives of the ASEAN Political
Security Community, while the VAP lays out the measures necessary for 2004-2010. Both
documents are important references in continuing political and security cooperation. The
APSC Blueprint provides a roadmap and timetable to establish the APSC by 2015. The APSC
Blueprint would also have the flexibility to continue programmes/activities beyond 2015 in
order to retain its significance and have an enduring quality.
To build on what has been constructed over the years in the field of political and security
cooperation, the ASEAN Leaders have agreed to establish the ASEAN Political-Security
Community (APSC). The APSC shall aim to ensure that countries in the region live at peace
with one another and with the world in a just, democratic and harmonious environment.
The members of the Community pledge to rely exclusively on peaceful processes in the
settlement of intra-regional differences and regard their security as fundamentally linked to
one another and bound by geographic location, common vision and objectives. It has the
12
13
ASEAN
Regional
Forum
(ARF)
Defence
Law
Transition
al Crime
C. Defence
The ASEAN Security Community (ASC) Plan of Action, adopted at the 10 th ASEAN
Summit, held in Vientiane on 29 November 2004, stipulates that ASEAN shall work
towards the convening of an annual ADMM. Against this background, the Inaugural
meeting of the ADMM was held in Kuala Lumpur on 9 May 2006.
14
The ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) is the highest defence consultative
and cooperative mechanism in ASEAN. The ADMM aims to promote mutual trust and
confidence through greater understanding of defence and security challenges as well
as enhancement of transparency and openness.
Cooperation in the ASEAN defence sector has grown steadily since its inception in
2006. In particular, cooperation in the issue of humanitarian assistance and disaster
relief (HADR) has been progressing significantly in the ADMM. The ASEAN
Defence Ministers have adopted concept papers to advance the cooperation in this
area and conducted series of activities including Workshops on the ASEAN Defence
Establishments and CSOs Cooperation in Non-Traditional Security and a Table-Top
Exercise on HADR.
D. Law
The ASEAN Law Ministerial Meeting was established in 1986. It is held once in 36
months. The ASEAN Law Ministerial Meeting was last held in Phnom Penh, 4-5
November 2011. The
E. Transitional Crime
The ASEAN Transitional Crime Ministerial Meeting was established in 1997. The
ASEAN Transitional Crime Ministerial Meeting is held in every two years. The last
meeting in Bali, Indonesia, 9-13 October 2011.
A key purpose of ASEAN is to respond effectively and in a timely manner, in
accordance with the principles of comprehensive security, to all forms of threats,
transnational crimes and transboundary challenges.
Charter. It shall be a means by which ASEAN Member States can pursue closer
interaction and cooperation to forge shared norms and create common mechanisms to
achieve ASEANs goals and objectives in the political and security fields. In this
regard, it promotes a people-oriented ASEAN in which all sectors of society,
regardless of gender, race, religion, language, or social and cultural background, are
encouraged to participate in, and benefit from, the process of ASEAN integration and
community building. In the implementation of, the Blueprint, ASEAN should also
strive towards promoting and supporting gender-mainstreaming, tolerance, respect for
diversity, equality and mutual understanding.
3. At the same time, in the interest of preserving and enhancing peace and stability in the
region, the APSC seeks to strengthen the mutually beneficial relations between
ASEAN and its Dialogue Partners and friends. In doing so, it also maintains the
centrality and proactive role of ASEAN in a regional architecture that is open,
transparent and inclusive, while remaining actively engaged, forward-looking and
non-discriminatory.
4. The APSC subscribes to a comprehensive approach to security, which acknowledges
the interwoven relationships of political, economic, social-cultural and environmental
dimensions of development. It promotes renunciation of aggression and of the threat
or use of force or other actions in any manner inconsistent with international law and
reliance of peaceful settlements of dispute. In this regard, it upholds existing ASEAN
political instruments such as the Declaration on Zone of Peace, Freedom and
Neutrality (ZOPFAN), the Treaty of Amity and Co-operation in South East Asia
(TAC) and the Treaty on the Southeast Asian Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone
(SEANWFZ), which play a pivotal role in the area of confidence building measures,
preventive diplomacy and pacific approaches to conflict resolution. It also seeks to
address non traditional security issues.
5. Based on the above, the ASEAN Political-Security Community envisages the
following three key characteristics:
a. A Rules-based Community of shared values and norms;
b. A Cohesive, Peaceful, Stable and Resilient Region with shared responsibility
for comprehensive security; and
c. A Dynamic and Outward-looking Region in an increasingly integrated and
interdependent world.
d.
16
6. These characteristics are inter-related and mutually reinforcing, and shall be pursued
in a balanced and consistent manner. To effectively realise the APSC, the APSC
Blueprint is in action-oriented document with a view to achieving results and
recognises the capacity and capability of ASEAN Member States to undertake the
stipulated actions in the Blueprint.
7.
At the 12th ASEAN Summit in January 2007, the Leaders affirmed their strong commitment
to accelerate the establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015 as envisioned in the
ASEAN Vision 2020 and the ASEAN Concord II, and signed the Cebu Declaration on the
Acceleration of the Establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015. In particular, the
Leaders agreed to hasten the establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015
and to transform ASEAN into a region with free movement of goods, services, investment,
skilled labour, and freer flow of capital.
18
ASEAN Economic
Community
ASEAN
Econom
ic
Minister
s (AEM)
Science
ASEA Energ
Finan Investm
&
Agricultu
N
y
ce ent Area Technolo
re
Free
gy
Trade
Area
Touris
m
19
momentum in order to achieve a stable, efficient and resilient financial system in the
region. The Ministers also reaffirmed their commitment to implement policies that
favour strong and sustainable growth as well as promote domestic demand, boost
productivity and enhance the integration of ASEANs markets.
F. Investment Area:
A key element to establishing ASEAN as a single market and production base is
having a free and open investment regime where (a) non-discriminatory treatment is
extended to ASEAN and ASEAN-based investors, save for limited exceptions that are
also due for progressive elimination; (b) rules and regulations are made transparent;
and (c) investors and their investments (i.e. covered investments) enjoy
protection.ASEAN is achieving these via the implementation of the ACIA, which took
effect on 29 March 2012. The ACIA, as one of the economic instruments for realising
regional economic integration, aims to create a liberal, facilitative, transparent and
competitive investment environment in ASEAN.
G. Science and Technology:
Science, technology and innovation can be powerful determinants and enablers of
economic development, educational programmes and protection of the environment.
This view is shared by the ASEAN Leaders who have recognised science and
technology (S&T) as a key factor in sustaining economic growth, enhancing
community well-being and promoting integration in ASEAN. The Leaders have
envisioned that by 2020 that ASEAN will be technology competitive, competent in
strategic and enabling technologies, with an adequate pool of technologically qualified
and trained manpower, and strong networks of scientific and technological institution
and centres of excellence.
The current S&T cooperation in ASEAN focuses on nine programme areas, namely (i)
food science and technology (ii) biotechnology, (iii) meteorology and geophysics, (iv)
marine science and technology, (v) non-conventional energy research, (vi)
microelectronics and information technology, (vii) material science and technology,
(viii) space technology and applications, and (ix) S&T infrastructure and resources
development. To coordinate and implement activities in each area, a Sub-Committee is
established.
H. Tourism:
The implementation of the ASEAN Tourism Strategic Plan (ATSP) 2011-2015 has
been well progressing, where 75% measures for 2013 have been duly completed. In
further promoting sustainable tourism to support timely realization of the ASEAN
21
Economic Community, measures under ASTP were updated to ensure its relevance to
its on-going efforts.
Significant progress was made in facilitating free flow of services and skilled labor
within
ASEAN
through
implementation
of
the
ASEAN Mutual
It will open more regional cooperation and will improve the scale efficiencies,
dynamism and competitiveness of Asean members. AEC will enable easier movement
of goods, services, investment, capital and people. Ultimately, it will offer new ways
of coordinating supply chains, or access to new markets for established products.
All Asean countries are more important to foreign investors if they are considered
as one node in a larger regional market of nearly 600 million people - a single market.
The Asean Free Trade Agreement will be expanded to zero tariffs on almost all goods
by 2015. Asean plans to remain engaged with the global economy through regionallevel free trade agreements - today, Asean has such agreements with China, Japan,
Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand.
The
USITC's
Asean:
Regional
Trends
in
Economic
Integration,
Export
Competitiveness, and Inbound Investment for Selected Industries Report noted that
22
Tourism opportunity. Asians travels more in the region and there are more travelers
from other countries that have begun to reach out to Asia as new visitors. The trends
were evident at the recent Hub City Forum, held by the Pacific Asia Tourism
Association (Pata), where more than 100 travel industry executives discussed the
tourism potential, government's spending to upgrade facilities both for leisure
attractions like museums; and also MICE facilities such as convention centers,
reported the newspaper. MICE tourism opportunities are particularly large and
hopefully countries that have the most experience in this area such as Thailand and
SIngapore will render their assistance to those with weak MICE experience - recent
examples of this are Thailand with Vietnam and also some talk in Thailand about
rendering assistance in Laos and possibly Cambodia.
Internationalization of health care under the AEC. Health care is one of the
sectors to be internationalized. This is definitely a big challenge as it is more
complicated than just the popularity of Singapore and Thailand's "medical tourism"
that patients travel from one country to another seeking better care at lower cost. The
23
However, it offers
potentials for the free-flow of health services, etc. in the region. Recent examples
here were noted in the Bangkok Post in mid-March which noted programs by
Thailand's largest medical service BGH and other Thai hospital groups to step-up the
pace of mergers and acquisitions and joint ventures in other AEC countries to help
give them a better platform to better take care of developing AEC opportunities.
services and air transport are carried out by their respective Ministerial bodies.
In liberalising services, there should be no back-loading of commitments, and
pre-agreed flexibility shall be accorded to all ASEAN Member Countries.
c. Free flow of investment- A free and open investment regime is key to
enhancing ASEANs competitiveness in attracting foreign direct investment
(FDI) as well as intra-ASEAN investment. Sustained inflows of new
investments and reinvestments will promote and ensure dynamic development
of ASEAN economies.
d. Freer flow of capital- Strengthening ASEAN Capital Market Development and
Integration.
2. Competitive Economic Region:
a. Competition Policy- The main objective of the competition policy is to foster a
culture of fair competition. Institutions and laws related to competition policy
have recently been established in some (but not all) ASEAN Member Countries
(AMCs) There is currently no official ASEAN body for cooperative work on
CPL to serve as a network for competition agencies or relevant bodies to
exchange policy experiences and institutional norms on CPL.
b. Consumer Protection- The building of an integrated economic region with a
people-centred approach in this region has made ASEAN mindful that
consumers cannot be precluded in all measures taken to achieve this
integration. Consumer protection measures are already being developed in
tandem with the proposed economic measures to address the already emerging
consumer protection.
c. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)- In principle, intellectual property (IP) policy
can serve as a powerful stimulus to (a) cultural, intellectual and artistic
creativity and their commercialisation; (b) efficient adoption and adaptation of
more advanced technologies; and (c) continuous learning to meet the everrising threshold of performance expectations.
d. Infrastructure Development- An efficient, secure and integrated infrastructure
in ASEAN is vital for realising the full potential of the ASEAN Free Trade
Area as well as in enhancing the attractiveness of the region as a single
production, tourism and investment destination and narrowing development
gaps. ASEAN transport is also critical in linking ASEAN with the neighbouring
Northeast and South Asian countries.
3.
Implementation of ASEAN
A strategic schedule that includes key milestones for a comprehensive and deeper economic
integration shall form an integral part of this Blueprint. Consultations have been made with
relevant bodies/stakeholders to invite their inputs and coordinating conferences were held to
jointly review the Blueprint and its strategic schedule among all stakeholders to ensure
consistency of the above measures, programmes and milestones across sectors and promote
greater sense of ownership of the Blueprint.
Relevant ASEAN sectoral bodies will coordinate the implementation of the above
programmes and measures while relevant government agencies will be responsible for
overseeing the implementation and preparation of more detailed action plans at the national
level. Partnership arrangements with the private sector, industry associations and the wider
community at the regional and national levels will also be actively sought where required to
ensure participation of all stakeholders in the integration process.
26
For the successful implementation of these programmes and measures, the necessary
institutions or mechanisms, resources, capacity and political will be accorded to the
Community building process.
Conclusion
The AEC is definitely a work in progress. Some efforts will go faster and bear quicker fruit
than others; others will face more challenges and may be less crisply implemented. Still, we
believe the future is clearly in favour of the AEC and that it offers clear opportunities and
challenges that all businesses need to be thinking about and preparing for. Those who fail to
do so, have no one to blame but themselves for missing out on a wonderful new opportunity
for sales, investment and engagement with Asia.
27
ASEAN Socio-Cultural
Community
Cultur
e&
Arts
Disaster
Managem
ent
Poverty
Eradicatio
n
Educatio
n
Labour
Social
Welfare &
Developme
nt
B. Disaster Management:
The ASEAN Committee on Disaster Management (ACDM) was established in early
2003 following the decision of the ASEAN Standing Committee (ASC). The
institutional mechanism (in the form of experts group) has existed since the 70s but
was only strengthened towards 2003 with the elevation of the experts group into a
full-fledged committee. The ACDM consists of heads of national agencies responsible
for disaster management of ASEAN Member Countries. The ACDM assumes overall
responsibility for coordinating and implementing the regional activities. The ACDM
met for the first time in December 2003.
The ARPDM is also used as a platform for cooperation and collaboration with
ASEAN Dialogue Partners and relevant international organisations. Ongoing partners
of ACDM include: the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, the
Pacific Disaster Centre, the United Nations Office for Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs (OCHA), UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), UNICEF, IFRC,
Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre (ADPC), etc.
29
C. Poverty Eradication:
ASEANs efforts to attain the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in the region
continued unabated in the year under review. At the 14th ASEAN Summit held in
Thailand in March 2009, the ASEAN Leaders, in the Joint Declaration on the
Attainment of the MDGs in ASEAN, called for the development of a Roadmap on the
MDGs. The Roadmap would serve as a framework for collective action among
ASEAN Member States to achieve the MDGs focusing on five key areas, namely
advocacy and linkages, knowledge, resources, expertise and regional cooperation and
regional public goods. To address the social impacts of the global financial crisis, the
High-Level Forum on Reducing Vulnerability in the Face of Crisis was held in
February 2009 at the ASEAN Secretariat. Attended by relevant government officials
from the ASEAN Plus Three Countries and representatives from various international
organisations, the Forum came up with a number of recommendations to be
undertaken at both regional and national levels. As a follow up to the Forum, the
ASEAN Assessment on the Social Impact of the Global Financial Crisis will be
conducted in the second half of 2009 with the support of AusAID. In addressing issues
pertaining to rural development and poverty eradication and in narrowing the
development gap in the region, a more concerted effort by Member States in the spirit
of ASEAN Help-ASEAN has been stressed. Such initiatives would include
documenting best
practices and
challenges
of
ASEAN
Member
States
in
D. Education:
Education underpins ASEAN community building. Education lies at the core of
ASEANs development process, creating a knowledge-based society and contributing
to the enhancement of ASEAN competitiveness. ASEAN also views education as the
vehicle to raise ASEAN awareness, inspire the we feeling, and create a sense of
belonging to the ASEAN Community and understanding of the richness of ASEANs
history, languages, culture and common values. At the 11th Summit in December
2005, ASEAN Leaders set new directions for regional education collaboration when
they welcomed the decision of the ASEAN Education Ministers to convene the
30
ASEAN Education Ministers Meetings (ASED) on a regular basis. The Leaders also
called for ASEAN Education Ministers to focus on enhancing regional cooperation in
education. As the collective entity to enhance regional cooperation in education, the
ASEAN Education Ministers identified four priorities that ASEAN cooperation on
education would address, namely: (i) Promoting ASEAN Awareness among ASEAN
citizens, particularly youth; (ii) Strengthening ASEAN identity through education; (iii)
Building ASEAN human resources in the field of education; and (iv) Strengthening
ASEAN University Networking. To this end, various projects and activities have
been/are being developed/organised to fulfil the directives.
E. Labour :
To enhance the competitiveness of ASEAN, human capital holds a key role in driving
the direction of the economy and the social progress. With ASEANs massive labour
force amounting to 285 million, ASEAN recognises the importance of job creation,
developing the quality of the workforce and providing social security to the workers.
Since 2000, ASEANs work on labour and human resources has been guided by the
ASEAN Labour Ministers (ALM) Work Programme. The Work Programme provides
the framework to prepare the regions labour force to face the challenges of
globalisation and trade liberalisation. The five broad priorities initially set in the Work
Programme are in the areas of employment generation, labour market monitoring,
labour mobility, social protection, and tripartite cooperation. In May 2006, the
ASEAN Labour Ministers agreed in their Joint Statement of 2006 to add a sixth
priority area, namely occupational safety and health (OSH), in the ALM Work
Programme. Apart from the priorities set in the ALM Work Programme, ASEAN
made a groundbreaking move to address the issue of migrant workers on 13 January
2007, when its Leaders signed the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and
Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers. The Declaration mandates ASEAN
countries to promote fair and appropriate employment protection, payment of wages,
and adequate access to decent working and living conditions for migrant workers. As
a follow-up to the Declaration, an ASEAN Committee on the Implementation of the
ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant
Workers (ACMW) convened its first Meeting in September 2008. The ACMW is
31
currently in the process of drafting the ASEAN instrument on the protection and
promotion of migrant workers and started the first round of discussions in April 2009
in Bangkok.
2. The ASCC will address the regions aspiration to lift the quality of life of its peoples
through cooperative activities that are people-oriented and environmentally friendly
geared towards the promotion of sustainable development. The ASCC shall contribute
to building a strong foundation for greater understanding, good neighbourliness, and a
shared sense of responsibility.
4. The ASCC shall respect the different cultures, languages, and religions of the peoples
of ASEAN emphasise their common values in the spirit of unity in diversity and adapt
them to present realities, opportunities and challenges.
5. The ASCC will also focus on the social dimension of Narrowing the Development
Gap (NDG) towards bridging the development gap among Member States.
6. Based on the above, the ASCC envisages the following characteristics: (a) Human
Development; (b) Social Welfare and Protection; (c) Social Justice and Rights; (d)
Ensuring Environmental Sustainability (e) Building the ASEAN Identity; and (f)
Narrowing the Development Gap.
33
engagement, the
ASEAN-India Partnership for Peace, Progress and Shared Prosperity, which sets out the
roadmap for long-term ASEAN-India engagement, was signed at the 3rd ASEAN-India
Summit on 30 November 2004 in Vientiane, Lao PDR. A Plan of Action (2004-2010) was
also developed to implement the Partnership. The 7 th ASEAN-India Summit held in October
2009 also noted with satisfaction the steady progress of implementation of the ASEANIndia
Partnership for Peace, Progress and Shared Prosperity. The Summit also agreed on a new and
more enhanced phase of the Plan of Action to implement the said Partnership in order to seize
the opportunities and overcome the challenges arising from the global financial crisis and
evolving political and economic landscape. Subsequently, the new ASEAN-India Plan of
Action for 2010-2015 was developed and adopted by the Leaders at the 8 th ASEAN-India
Summit in October 2010 in Ha Noi.
Following the entry into force of the ASEAN Charter, and based on the strong foundation of
the ASEAN-India Dialogue Relations, India has accredited its Ambassador to ASEAN based
in Jakarta, particularly to work closely with the Committee of Permanent Representatives to
ASEAN (CPR) and the ASEAN Secretariat. At the 10 th ASEAN-India Summit on 9 October
2012 in Bandar Seri Begawan, India announced its intention to establish a separate
Diplomatic Mission to ASEAN with a Resident Ambassador as an illustration of the
intensification of the ASEAN-India Strategic Partnership.
ASEAN and India marked the 20th anniversary of their Dialogue Relations in 2012 with a
Commemorative Summit held in India on 20 December 2012. A number of commemorative
activities were carried out to signify the expanding and deepening of the Dialogue
Partnership.
In this connection, the ASEAN-India Eminent Persons group (EPG) was established to take
stock of ASEAN-India relations over the past 20 years, explore ways to widen and deepen
existing cooperation between ASEAN and India, as well as recommend measures to further
strengthen ASEAN-India relations in the future, taking into account existing documents
35
signed/adopted by both sides, as well as key ASEAN documents, particularly the ASEAN
Charter, Roadmap for an ASEAN Community, the three Blueprints of the ASEAN
Community and other relevant documents. The Report of the AIEPG was submitted to the
10th ASEAN-India Summit in November 2012 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. In this regard, the
Leaders tasked the Ministers to consider the report thoroughly and to implement the key
recommendations where appropriate.
Economic Cooperation
Volume of trade and investment flows between ASEAN and India remained relatively low
compared with other dialogue partners of ASEAN. Between 1993 and 2003, ASEAN-India
bilateral trade grew at an annual rate of 11.2%, from US$ 2.9 billion in 1993 to US$ 12.1
billion in 2003.
The total trade between ASEAN and India grew by 5.3%, from US$68.2 billion in 2011 to
US$71.8 billion in 2012. At the 10th ASEAN-India Summit in November 2012, the Leaders
set the target of US$100 billion by 2015 for ASEAN-India trade. Foreign direct investments
(FDI) from India rebounded from negative US$ 1.7 billion in 2011 to US$2.6 billion in 2012.
Acknowledging this trend and recognising the economic potential of closer linkages, both
sides recognised the opportunities for deepening trade and investments, and agreed to
negotiate a framework agreement to pave the way for the establishment of an ASEAN-India
Free Trade Area.
At the 2nd ASEAN-India Summit in 2003, the Leaders signed the ASEAN-India Framework
Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation. The Framework Agreement laid a
sound basis for the establishment of an ASEAN-India Free Trade Area (FTA), which includes
FTA in goods, services and investment.
ASEAN and India signed the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods (TIG) Agreement in Bangkok on
13 August 2009 after six years of negotiations. The signing of the ASEAN-India Trade in
Goods Agreement paves the way for the creation of one of the worlds largest free trade areas
(FTA) - market of almost 1.8 billion people with a combined GDP of US$ 2.8 trillion. The
ASEAN-India FTA will see tariff liberalisation of over 90% of products traded between the
two dynamic regions. Tariffs on over 4,000 product lines will be eliminated by 2016, at the
earliest. The ASEAN-India TIG Agreement entered into force on 1 January 2010.
36
During the 10th ASEAN-India Summit in November 2012, the ASEAN-India Leaders tasked
their economic ministers to step up their efforts and flexibility to conclude the ASEAN-India
Trade in Services and Investment Agreement at the earliest. Subsequently, an announcement
on the conclusion of the negotiations on both Agreements on ASEAN-India Trade in Services
and Investment was made at the ASEAN-India Commemorative Summit on 20 December
2012. The concluded draft Agreement is targeted to be signed in the near future.
ASEAN and India are also working on enhancing private sector engagement, including the
re-activation of the ASEAN-India Business Council (AIBC), the holding of the first ASEANIndia Business Summit (AIBS) and an ASEAN-India Business Fair and Conclave (AIBFC)
held in New Delhi on 2-6 March 2011 with participation of an estimated 500 trade exhibitors,
business leaders, practitioners and entrepreneurs from ASEAN and India to showcase their
products and services. The 2nd AIBF was held at the sidelines of the ASEAN-India
Commemorative Summit, in New Delhi on 18-20 December 2012. The events were part of
the efforts to stimulate trade and business-to-business interaction.
The 14th ASEAN Transport Ministers (ATM) Meeting on 6 November 2008 in Makati, Metro
Manila, Philippines adopted the ASEAN-India Aviation Cooperation Framework, which will
lay the foundation for closer aviation cooperation between ASEAN and India. In 2012, India
participated for the first time in the 21 st ASEAN Land Transport Working Group (LTWG)
Meeting. During the Meeting, India presented her initiatives for enhanced cooperation on
ASEAN Action Plan, covering various sectors such as land transport, maritime
transport,border management, customs, immigration, logistics and safety and Public Private
Partnership (PPP).
The IndiaMyanmarThailand Trilateral Highway Project and its extension to Laos and
Cambodiais one of current proposed projects to achieve greater ASEAN-India physical
connectivity. The project is planned to connect the ASEAN Highway Network with the
highway system in eastern India.
In tourism, the number of visitor arrivals from India to ASEAN in 2012 was 2.84 million, an
increase from 2.711 million 2011. The 2 nd Meeting of ASEAN and India Tourism Ministers
(ATM+India) held on 25 January 2010 in Bandar Seri Begawan supported the establishment
of the ASEAN Promotional Chapter for Tourism (APCT) in Mumbai, India as an important
collaborative platform for ASEAN National Tourism Organisations (NTOs) to market
Southeast Asia to the Indian consumers and, at the same time, create mutual awareness
37
between ASEAN Member States and India. The registration of APCT and its activities
commenced in 2011.
To further enhance tourism collaboration between ASEAN and India through concrete
activities, during the 3rdATM+India held on 12 January 2012 in Manado, Indonesia, the
ASEAN and India Tourism Ministers signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
between ASEAN and India on Strengthening Tourism Cooperation, which would serve as the
key instrument for more action-oriented cooperation, encouraging both parties to cooperate in
facilitating travel and tourist visits and further strengthen the close tourism partnership. The
Ministers also welcomed the ASEAN-India Car Rally. This Rally, held from 26 November
21 December 2012, marked another meaningful step forward in ASEAN-India tourism
cooperation and at the same time reflected the existence of land route connectivity that would
facilitate tourism exchange between ASEAN and India.
Further on connectivity, the 10th ASEAN-India Summit welcomed the establishment of
Indias Inter-Ministerial Group on Connectivity and encouraged regular exchanges between
the Group and the ASEAN Connectivity Coordinating Committee (ACCC) to explore
concrete ways and means to support the MPAC, in particular in areas where India has strong
expertise and interest. The 1st ASEAN-India ACCC Meeting was held in Balikpapan,
Indonesia. The Meeting served in providing a format for expeditious exchange of information
to facilitate decision making on broad project proposals and ideas mentioned in the numerous
studies on ASEAN-India Connectivity.
Significant developments can also be seen in the cooperation in the agriculture and forestry
sector as ASEAN and India have successfully held the first and second ASEAN-India
Ministerial Meeting on Agriculture and Forestry on 8 October 2011 in Jakarta, Indonesia and
on 17 October 2012 in New Delhi, India, respectively. The Ministers adopted the Medium
Term Plan of Action for ASEAN-India Cooperation in Agriculture (2011-2015) with the view
to promoting and intensifying cooperation in the agriculture and forestry sector between
ASEAN and India, in order to meet the challenges of food security, to exchange information
and technology, to cooperate on research and development projects, to encourage agriculture
and forestry-related industries, and to strengthen human resources development. A number of
cooperative activities in this areas have been carried out, most notably the ASEAN-India Agri
Expo and the Symposium onIndo-ASEAN Export Potential of Agriculture Products that were
organised on 17 19 October 2012 and 18 October 2012, respectively, in New Delhi;
publication of the regular edition of the ASEAN-India Newsletter on Agriculture and Forestry
38
since 2012; ASEAN-India Farmers Exchange Programme,; and the Conference of Heads of
Agriculture Universities and Research Institutions of India and ASEAN organised on 18-21
February 2013 in New Delhi.
Socio-Cultural Cooperation
Over the years, ASEAN-India socio-cultural cooperation has been expanded to include
human resource development, science and technology (S&T), people-to-people contacts,
health and pharmaceuticals, transport and infrastructure, small and medium enterprises
(SMEs), tourism, information and communication technology (ICT), agriculture, energy and
Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI). All cooperation projects are funded by the ASEANIndia Fund (AIF).
Cooperation in these areas are carried out through the implementation of the Plan of Action
(PoA) to Implement the ASEAN-India Partnership for Peace, Progress and Shared Prosperity,
which was adopted by the Leaders at the 3 rdASEAN-India Summit in November 2004 in
Vientiane. The PoA is carried out through activities under the various existing ASEAN
sectoral work plans, Declarations concluded between ASEAN and India, as well as priority
activities under the Roadmap for an ASEAN Community 2009-2015 that could be
implemented with India.
India is also actively contributing to the implementation of the IAI Work Plan with the
implementation of some of the IAI projects/activities, such as the Entrepreneurship
Development Centres (EDC) and the Centres for the English Language Training (CELT) in
Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Viet Nam. India also positively considering the
establishment of a CELT in Indonesia.
In continuing to promote people-to-people contacts to foster ASEAN-India relations at the
peoples level, ASEAN and India maintain to organise programme/activities that have been
ongoing annually, namely ASEAN-India Students Exchange Programme, Special Course for
ASEAN Diplomats, and Delhi Dialogue, as well as the ongoing programme such as ASEANIndia Media Exchange Programme, ASEAN-India Young Farmers Exchange Programme and
the ASEAN-India Network of Think-Tanks.
Pursuant to the announcement by the Prime Minister of India during the 6 th ASEAN-India
Summit held in November 2007, the ASEAN-India Green Fund with an initial contribution of
US$ 5 million was set up in 2010 to support cooperative pilot projects between ASEAN and
39
40
Conclusion
ASEAN had its beginning as a diplomatic mechanism for subregional reconciliation. Initially
conceived for economic co-operation, it has gradually evolved into an organization of
political and security co-operation going beyond the bounds of its member nations. Though
the membership has expanded only gradually since its formation in 1967, from five to six
members, its corporate identity has been recognized as an international actor. However, as a
regional organization has it been effective as it should be? Some consider the Association to
be successful, since no armed conflict has erupted within the ASEAN since its creation.
Theres a believe that it could do more. As one political analyst wrote, 'Unless ASEAN and
other interested parties move beyond the dialogue of a dining club and begin focusing on
41
concrete action, the challenges to regional security will go unmet". 52 The optimism enerated
by the end of the Cold War for regional stability and the US-Sino and Sino-Soviet rivalries
has substantially been eroded. While the possibility of a major armed international conflict in
Southeast Asia may seem remote at the moment, strategic uncertainties and potential
flashpoints abound. Certainly, no ASEAN leader is optimistic about the changing regional
balance of power, even if none can point to any clear external threat to regional security.
The ASEAN may be described as one of the more successful regional organizations in the
world, but it cannot isolate itself from the political realities of the changing times. The goals
of the founding fathers of the Association to free the region from external powers and for the
organization to remain as an economic block cannot be possible without security and defense
agreements. As shown in the containment and termination of the Cambodian conflict, the
ASEAN as a regional organization was a major actor in the final conflict resolution. The
potential strength of the ASEAN can be used to balance any threat from any external
superpower. Even with the ideological differences among the other Southeast Asian nations,
like Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma, the ASEAN leaders should find ways to harness
these economically strapped nations which could be beneficial to the Association.
The ASEAN may be described as one of the more successful regional organizations in the
world, but it cannot isolate itself from the political realities of the changing times. The goals
of the founding fathers of the Association to free the region from external powers and for the
organization to remain as an economic block cannot be possible without security and defense
agreements. As shown in the containment and termination of the Cambodian conflict, the
ASEAN as a regional organization was a major actor in the final conflict resolution. The
potential strength of the ASEAN can be used to balance any threat from any external
superpower. Even with the ideological differences among the other Southeast Asian nations,
like Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma, the ASEAN leaders should find ways to harness
these economically strapped nations which could be beneficial to the Association.
42
Bibliography
http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-19.pdf
http://www.slideshare.net/isabeltumarong/asean-and-overview-of-southeast-asia-issues-andchallenges?related=1
http://www.asean.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Southeast_Asian_Nations
Acknowledgement
I owe a great many thanks to many people who helped and supported me during this Project.
43
My deepest thanks to Lecturer, Ms. Afroz , the Guide of the project for guiding and correcting
various documents of mine with attention and care. She has taken pain to go through the
project and make necessary correction as and when needed.
I would also thank my Institution and my faculty members without whom this project would
have been a distant reality. I also extend my heartfelt thanks to my family and well wishers.
Methodology
The data used in this project has been collected from secondary sources. There are those data
which have already been collected by someone else and have panel through statistical power.
When the researcher utilizes secondary data, he has to look into various sources from where
he can obtain data usually published data is available in:
45