Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
September, 1984
$2.95
WETTED TREES
FLORAL SHIFTS
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
is a non-profit, non-political, educational organization, dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of
state and church. We accept the explanation of Thomas Jefferson that the "First Amendment"
to the
Constitution of the United States was meant to create a "wall of separation" between state and church.
American Atheists are organized to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning
religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough
understanding of them, their origins and histories;
to encourage the development and public acceptance of a human ethical system, stressing the mutual
sympathy, understanding
and interdependence
of all people and the corresponding
responsibility of each
individual in relation to society;
to develop and propagate a culture in which man is the central figure who alone must be the source of
strength, progress and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
to promote the study of the arts and sciences and of all problems affecting the maintenance,
perpetuation and enrichment of human (and other) life;
to engage in such social, educational, legal and cultural activity as will be useful and beneficial to
members of American Atheists and to society as a whole.
Atheism may be defined as the mental attitude which unreservedly accepts the supremacy of reason and
aims at establishing a lifestyle and ethical outlook verifiable by experience and the scientific method,
independent of all arbitrary assumptions of authority and creeds.
Materialism declares that the cosmos is devoid of immanent conscious purpose; that it is governed by its own
inherent, immutable and impersonal laws; that there is no supernatural interference in human life; that man finding his resources within himself - can and must create his own destiny. Materialism restores to man his
dignity and his intellectual integrity. It teaches that we must prize our life on earth and strive always to improve
it. It holds that man is capable of creating a social system based on reason and justice. Materialism's "faith" is in
man and man's ability to transform the world culture by his own efforts. This is a commitment which is in very
essence life asserting. It considers the struggle for progress as a moral obligation and impossible without noble
ideas that inspire man to bold creative works. Materialism holds that humankind's potential for good and for an
outreach to more fulfilling cultural development is, for all practical purposes, unlimited .
*************** * * ***.****.* *
American Atheist Membership
Life membership
Sustaining membership
Family/Couple membership
Individual membership
Senior Citizen/Unemployed*
Student membership*
Categories
membership
S500.00
S100.00/year
S50.00/year
S40.00/year
S20.00/year
S12.00/year
*I.D. required
All membership categories receive our monthly "Insider's Newsletter," membership card(s), a
subscription to American Atheist magazi ne for the duration of the membership period, plus additional
organizational mailings, i.e. new products for sale, convention and meeting announcements, etc.
September, 1984
REGULAR FEATURES
Editorial
Ask A.A.
News & Comments: Mental Circumcision
Reader Service
The Atheist Next Door
Poetry
Historical Notes
American Atheist Radio Series
Potpourri
Letters to The Editor
Classified Advertising
2
4
5
26
28
29
32
33
37
38
40
SPECIAL FEATURES
Atheism as Therapy -- William Talley
Summer Solstice Picnic: Photo Section
They Who Prey Together -- Bret Jason Sinclair
The Philosophy of Science and The Fringes of Reality
T.RobertGrace
Happiness and The Atheist -- Lowell Newby
18
20
24
25
27
FEATURED CQLUMNISTS
Towards National Integration -- Margaret Bhatty
Contributions, Idols and Images -- Gerald Tholen
Editor
Robin Murray-O'Hair
Editor Emeritus
Madalyn O'Hair
Managing Editor
Jon G. Murray
Assistant Editor
Gerald Tholen
Poetry
Angeline Bennett
Geraid Tholen
Production Staff
John Crump
BillKight
Alexander Stevens
Steve Paige Streeter
Gloria Tholen
Non-Resident Staff
G. Stanley Brown
Jeff Frankel
Merrill Holste
Margaret Bhatty
Fred Woodworth
30
35
Periodical Index
ISSN: 0332-4310
1984 by Society of Separationists, Inc.
Address
City
State
--<..Zip,
Address
City
State
_
----:-
_
Zip
ARE YOU
MOVING?
Please notify us six
weeks in advance to
ensure uninterrupted
delivery.
Send us
both your old and
new addresses. Ifpossible, attach old label
from a recent magazine issue in the bottom address space
provided.
On The Cover
In the many mediums of artistic expression
great painters and photographers have always
used a full range of color clarity and/or diffusion. This is because the trained eye has come
to know that any scene can be given unique
qualities simply by changing it's intensity and
detail with slight optical adjustments.
Our cover picture would be equally as
beautiful had the photo been shot during the
brilliance of summer sunlight. Nature has it's
own style in artistry. Who would dare to say
that some scenes, shrouded in rainfall or fog,
are not as beautiful as intensely lighted pictures of mountains or skylines?
If the availability of daylight was constant; if
humidity factors never varied - various settings, month to month, would seldom change
perceptively. One of the attributes of Nature
is that, in most locales, change adds significantly to the beauty of our world. When we peer
into the vagueness of a hazy setting we should
remember that it is the haze that demonstrates the true beauty thereof. When the
horizon is limited the foreground features
become totally different in appearance and
that visual limitation is as much a part of fall as
are the colorful leaves on a clear, crisp autumn
day.
Over the years I have come to understand
thet there are no dreary days. There are only
differences of atmospheric limitations of daylight and every day possesses a beauty of it's
own. Even a pounding hurricane surf has a
uniqueness which is intriguing. Some of the
most famous photos in history were of droughtridden plains and fields. As intelligent living
creatures we should know how to cope with
nature's moods for that is truly one of the
"spices of life" to which poets refer.
Primitive people were fearful of Nature's
occasional "harshness". Indeed, they were
fearful of many things! Yet, any old sea captain
would be the first to say that he'd rather be
tossed in a gale than be tired by a continuing
calm.
Many people, I fear, are "mood oriented" by
the changes (or non-changes) of weather. If,
however, one can eventually come to appreciate every day - whether rainy, foggy or
clear - whether hot or cold - life truly
becomes a day to day adventure.
Have a nice one.
Gerald Tholen
Cover Art
Jeff Greenberg
September, 1984
Page 1
EDITORIAL /
Jon G.
Murray
DROLLERY AT THE
DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION
I
September, 1984
ticket. Again no one had guts enough to say what the smile and
answer really meant. It meant that Reagan knew that the American
public would not want a woman as president or in a position that she
might become president. The White House is still a man's job in the
eyes of the great majority. So Reagan knew that it would make his
reelection bid easier because Mondale had picked a woman. No one
would publically acknowledge that sexism is a part of the fabric of our
nation, chiefly due to our "religious heritage."
We all know, privately, to ourselves, what is going on. We all know
that we have been acculturated into a position where we will not
accept a Black or a woman in the White House. Face it; that IS the way
it is. We are acculturated to hate the Russians. There is no way that,
Democratic or Republican, we are going to come to any meaningful
arms reduction or elimination agreements with a culture that we have
been emotionally conditioned to hate so much.
Women are seen as "unequal" to men, just plain and simple. In fact,
most women themselves feel inferior because they were taught to feel
inferior - but just won't admit it.
What is necessary is a de programming and reacculturation of an
entire nation and that takes many many generations. It cannot be
done overnight. We all know that the "majority" are still religious,
racist, sexist and hate any other political or economic systems
because they don't know anything about them and don't want to
learn. We sit, however, and play around with the symptoms of these
basic systemic problems. We place a bandage here and a bandage
there. It is like putting a little drop of ointment on each little measle
instead of looking to cure the patient as a whole. Why is the feeling
predominant that if we don't keep doing things the way our fathers
have done them, sticking to the same old problem solving methods,
that the whole nation willcollapse? We need to so something newlike have the kind of revolution that started this nation and I think that
we willfind that we can, indeed, all live through it.
I have some examples of what I am talking about. During the
Democratic National Convention, one of the American Atheist
Chapter officers (John Massen) in San Francisco was instrumental in
having drafted a paper to exhort individual delegates to place the idea
of a "No first strike" pledge on the part of the United States into the
Democratic platform, or on the convention form. He had over 6,000
of these papers printed up and, with his wife driving, he went from
hotel to hotel to hand deliver them to the heads of each of the
delegations, asking them, in turn, to distribute them to each of their
delegates. I heard no mention of "No first strike" on the convention
floor at all. Not alone our Chapter but the idea was simply ignored.
The Texas State Textbook Commission meets regularly to review
and select books for use in the Texas public schools, statewide. This
year they have been reviewing and selecting biology books. Since
Texas is the largest block purchaser of public school texts in the
nation whatever title is selected in Texas is the one the publishers go
with and thus the rest of the states are stuck with the decision of
Texas because that is the only book then published and thus
available. A controversy has been going on here in Austin at the
hearings for some time concerning" creationism" in the biology texts
versus evolution. The National Academy of Sciences, since an 1863
Act of Congress, the officialadvisory body to the Federal government
on questions of science and technology, came out with a position
paper entitled, "Science and Creationism - A viewfrom the National
Academv of Sciences." The conclusion of that paper was that
Creatioriis~ is not science and that the teaching of creationism is not
appropriate as an activity in our public schools. The textbook
selection process in Texas is confined in such a system that since this
paper was published after the deadline for submission of Bills of
Particulars to the Commission members which occurred some six
months or ago, it was inadmissible to them now during the month of
July as they sit in the middle of their deliberations on biology texts!
We have tried everything of which we know, here, at The American
Atheist Center to get copies of this National Academy of Sciences
paper to the Texas State Textbook Commissioners. The staff of the
Commission will not let the information through to them under any
circumstances. Gerald Tholen, the Vice President of American
Austin, Texas
September, 1984
Page 3
ASKA.A.
Dear Friends,
In a letter I wrote to you last January, I
closed with the statement "You do a great
job at The Center and we're behind you
100%."You ARE doing a great job, but there
is one minor but very annoying issue where
we are NOT behind you. That is the issue of
what we do and do not capitalize.
I was taught in school that all proper
names are capitalized. To do otherwise is
incorrect grammar. Ireally don't care whether there was such a person as Santa Clause
or Jesus Christ. I don't care whether two
billionpeople build a religion around Puff the
Magic Dragon. And I don't care whether
there is a single word of truth in the Bible.
The point is that these are proper names
and they should be capitalized.
I may not be as committed to Atheism as
you are, but I AM one of the first 100 life
members. I [recently bought] a computer
which is used at least 75% for American
Atheist business. And judging from the
monthly income report (which is sent to
Chapter Directors each month - ed.),
there aren't many people who donate more
than I. With this level of involvement, it still
seems childish to me to write "jesus christ"
instead of "Jesus Christ." We don't need to
resort to that kind of cheap-shot to discredit
Bible mythology.
As a Chapter Director, I've met my share
of Atheists. I've never heard anyone support
your decision to use lower-case for mythological names. And I've heard a number of
negative comments on it. Whom are you
trying to impress? I'm not impressed. The
Atheists I know aren't impressed. The peopie [to whom you have responded] in the
Letters to The Editor column weren't impressed. The Jeezers certainly aren't impressed. And I don't think ANYONE thinks
more of American Atheists because of it.
The "last straw" that inspired this letter
was when I began reading The Bible Handbook about an hour ago. Your decision to
use lower case in your quotations from the
Bible makes it harder to read. The Bible is
full of words that I don't recognize. When I
see the word "arphaxad," I have to stop and
ask myself what the H-ll an arphaxad is.
However, when I see the word "Arphaxad,"
I know it's a proper name. Probably either
the name of a person, a tribe of people, or a
city. The capitals make it easier to read! And
this applies to articles in the American
Atheist magazine, as well.
Atheists are supposed to be rational individuals. This policy makes us look childish,
both to Atheists and to Jeezers to boot. It
makes our material harder to read. And it
appears to serve no useful purpose. If I
haven't persuaded you to stop this practice,
the least you can do is ask the members
Page 4
Christ in caps we are unconsciously recognizing the 'power' those words can have
over us. " The writer pointed out that in the
"original Greek-Hebrew of the early gospels
'Jesu' meant 'redeemer.' 'Christos' meant
'messiah', from the Hebrew Mashiach 'savior'. " The alternative, he suggested, was
the use of the term "jesuchrist't to "mean 'the
false prophet' or 'the alleged and supposed
Christian messiah '. " The thousand year old
practice of revering someone who had not
existed was not appealing; the use of this
new term began in the American Atheist but
it was not consistently utilized.
.
The issue of capitalization came to head at
The American Atheist Center with the reprinting of the Bible Handbook. The consistent practice of lower casing mythological
beings, individuals, groups and places does
make it difficult to read the book. After a
string of staff meetings and protracted discussions, it was decided that when the book was
reprinted it would be with all its capitals
intact.
When the current editor assumed her
position, she felt that clarity was the most
September, 1984
important consideration.
It is for that reason, that there has been increasing capitalization of terms associated with religion in
recent issues.
A great number of letters, both pro and
con, have been received by The Center
concerning this issue. The best "pro" opinion held that the decapitalization
practices
Woodworth
also
mentioned
that
"[H]arking back to religious origins in language is liable to have exactly the reverse
effect of the one intended - it might rereligionize things instead of further secularizing them,"
Both sides have a point.
However, the current editor has decided
that the American Atheist will be abiding by
the rules of the Chicago Manual of Style
published
by the University of Chicago
Press - with two exceptions: (1) the words
"Atheism"
and "Atheist"
when used as
nouns, will be capitalized and (2) the word
"god" will be lower-cased.
Therefore you
may expect standard usage, with these two
exceptions, in allfuture issues of the Ameri-
can Atheist.
Editor
1984
MENTAL CIRCUMCISION
The frustrations and difficulties the various states encounter when dealing with
fundamentalist Christians develops from an
inadequate understanding of the nature of
the beast - religion. The dominant religion
in the United States is Judeo-Christianity,
the latter being firmly rooted in the former,
one of the most insane religions ever to exist
and now a major tragedy in the world. One
only needs to look at the fanatics who fasten
the theocracy of Judaism on Israel and the
Muslin religion on the Arab states, especially Iran and Iraq, to understand the intractable, irrational, positions these religious
leaders take - with their religions rooted in
the Old Testament. Judeo-Christianity became no better with its New Testament
version, as evidenced by the current Pope,
the Falwellians, and the history of JudeoChristianity in the Western World, The
Roman Catholic version, having come to
power by the sword, has left a bloody trail of
oppression throughout history. The birth of
the Protestant religion was through decimatingwars. The Protestant Inquisition matched
the Roman Catholic Inquistion in unspeakable inhuman atrocities. Given its history,
what can humankind expect from JudeoChristianity?
Those who are not acquainted with history learn nothing from it. The fanatical
Jews were unable to live within any other
nation, or their own, even so long ago as an
alleged 1,500 years. Their record is one of
defiance of any secular power, of state and
conquering armies alike. The only way they
were ever "handled" was to be dispersed,
isolated, or annihilated. And, as they formed
small enclaves within other nations they
demanded and obtained, through intransigent behavior, special exemptions from laws
and customs applicable to all.
Jesus Christ was a Jew. In respect to Old
Testament Judaism, he stated that he would
change "not a tittle or a jot." Everyone
seems to have forgotten that.
"The law" of the Old Testament carried
over into the new modified form of Judaism
which came to be known as Judeo-Christianity and its early proponents were not less
inflexible than their mentors, the Jews.
Their quarrels with the Roman Empire were
over their uncompromising adherence to
their emotionally based, irrational New Testament type Judaism.
As the Judeo-Christians implanted themselves in the bosom of our own ill-working
Republic, they have again and again emphasized that they consider the entire United
States to be a nation "under God." They
Austin, Texas
schools, and at the primary levels of education. The younger the child, the more easily
malleable is his mind.
The basic battle was fought by the Roman
Catholic Church during the last one hundred and fiftyyears. When immigrants from
Roman Catholic countries flooded into the
United States during the great periods of
immigration, the Roman Catholic Church
saw its children falling away from the parent
religion because of their immersion in the
predominantly Protestant school system. In
fact, the Church has proclaimed, and rightly
so, that if all the immigrants who were
Roman Catholic had remained in the Church,
the nation would have long ago been completely captured by that religion. For a
century and a half the Church struggled to
remove or render ineffective that influence
on their children. In diverse cities throughout the United States armed conflict occurred in the streets, notably in Philadelphia, New York, and Cincinnati. The Church
went again and again to state courts to stop
the use of the Protestant King James Bible
and recitation of Protestant prayers. Finally,
the Church decided to set up an alternate
school system and instituted what has come
to be known as Roman Catholic parochial
schools. As this school system grew it came
into direct confrontation with the truancy
laws of several states which required all
children to attend public schools. After
years of court fights, the issue was resolved
with a decision handed down by the U. S.
Supreme Court on June 1st, 1925, Pierce v.
Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names, 45
S. Ct. 571.This involved the State of Oregon.
There, the Compulsory Education Act,
adopted on November 7, 1922, compelled
all normal children age eight to sixteen to
attend public schools. Pierce, the Governor, was sued by the Roman Catholic
Society ofT he Sisters ofThe Holy Names of
Jesus and Mary and by the Hill Military
Academy, both of which were corporations
desiring to continue their private schools.
Reading the decision, it becomes obvious
that the Supreme Court was swayed by the
amount of money involved, rather than by
any alleged constitutional principles. It noted
that the Roman Catholic order's income
from the primary schools involved exceeded $30,000 a year. That was a simply a
helluva lot of money at a time when eggs
sold for a few pennies a dozen. The Hill
Military Academy's average attendance was
about one hundred, and annual fees received from each student amounted to
some $800 - a total of $80,000 a year. The
Page 5
1984
1984
A
"$INNEQ"
1984
"LEARN MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND SOCIAL STUDIES FQOM GOD'S VIEWPOINT
September, 1984
He was Everett Sileven, age 47, from Missouri. His father had been an itinerant
Southern Baptist preacher in Muskogee,
Oklahoma. He, himself, held a doctorate in
theology from Faith Baptist Theological
Seminary in Morgantown, Kentucky. Taking the Bible as the literal and indisputable
word of god, he had always felt that the
Southern Baptists were too liberal. And, in
1977, he began a small A.C.E. school in the
basement of his little red- brick church, just
on the edge of town. His daughter, Tresa
who had a master's degree from HylesAnderson College, an unaccredited Bible
college in Hammond, Indiana, was put in
charge of the school. Both Sileven and his
daughter felt that she was certified to teach
by the Lord. "I dedicated my lifeto the Lord,
not the state. The Lord led me to teach.
Why should I go to the state to ask permission?" The school began each day with a
pledge of allegiance to the Christian flag,
then to the Bible and then to the flag of the
United States ("... under God ..." of course),
in that order.
The Superintendant of schools in Louisville heard about the teaching activity in the
church basement and asked Sileven for the
chidren's education records. There were
none. Since the youngsters were violating
Austin, Texas
1984
1984
1984
1984
dents. Any Atheist could settle that argument in ten seconds. But, this issue is so
charged with emotion it is "difficult to ascertain the truth." AC.E. declared in its 1979
puff that student coming to AC.E. directly
out of the public schools were able to
increase their test scores after a year in
AC.E. One fundamentalist Christian principal (Glad Tidings Institute in Sherman,
Texas), however, found that about twenty
of his high-school-Ievel students in the former AC.E. school needed remedial work.
"The students would ask the teachers questions about math and the teachers didn't
know what they were talking about because
the questions were not answered in the
packets." Another principal, Brazosport
Christian School in Lake Jackson, Texas,
found AC.E. students far below grade level
when tested. Often, however, the question
of how well the children are taught is
academic since those who continue their
education after they leave the Christian
academies often proceed to Christian colleges or Bible schools and the others may go
directly into the work force, or into marriage
and housekeeping. The Association of Christian Schools International has established
its own accreditation and certification standards and insists that in 1973, 11,000 students in 66 Christian schools in Maryland
took the California Achievement Test and
scored 25 percent higher than the national
public school average on the same test. It
could be possible because the public
schools are required to take all comers,
whereas the private Christian academies
take a select few.
Also. it is not known if the christian
programs see that children willbe especially
prepared for particlar achievement test.
A C.E. has not claimed that it has established
either accreditation or certification standards
of its own.
Meanwhile, back in Nebraska, more than
a hundred and fifty ministers came from
around the country in early 1983 to a protest
this time planned by a fundamentalist minister out of Wheaton, Illinois. Rather than
send their children to a state accredited
school, some of the parents had fled the
state. Sileven was, himself, out beating the
bushes for support. "They have been forced
to live out of suitcases, to run like a pack of
hunted animals," the Wheaton minister said
about Sileven and the parents involved.
"The school is a part of the church ministry,
and the state has no right to regulate it in any
way. You simply have to take a stand
somewhere." Along the line, Sileven had
been sentenced to eight months in jail unless
the parents of all former students enrolled
their children in schools approved by the
Nebraska Department of Education. And,
in one brief instance while he was in jail, the
parents decided that they would not enroll
September, 1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
1984
The non-existant Jesus Christ is supposed to have said, "Suffer the little chldren
to come unto me." American Atheists agree. These poor children now being programmed by the collusion of their parents
with fundamentalist ministers and educators (both of which are as much concerned
with making a buck as with "educating" the
children) willfullfillthe prophetic statement
of "suffer the little children." The psychological problems, which willdevelop for each
and everyone because of the indoctrination
they are undergoing while they are helpless
at the hands of adults, willneed treatment in
the future.
This entire tragic mess can only develop
into more and more complicated legal challenges until finally one of the cases is accepted for review by the United States
Supreme Court now composed almost exclusively of reactionaries. At that point, the
idiocy of "Christian academies" could well
become a legitimate institution for the brutalization of children's minds.
September, 1984
Page 17
William Talley
ATHEISM AS THERAPY
A Layman's Gestalt
verybody's an expert. Nobody knows that better than an
advertising person or a shrink. Of course, the use of psychology
in advertising dates back to the great P. T. Barnum, but no matter. I'll
make no attempt here at proving my inexpertise in psychology and
psychotherapy by making comic pronunciamentos from the exalted
position of amateur, even though ad clients and therapy patients do it
all the time.
It's okay to quote some real experts, though, so I will,starting with
the illustrious Mr. Barnum. Don't scoff. A review of his biography
earned me a desperately needed "A" in "Mass Communications" at
dear old University of Denver, back in dear old '55. Barnum said, in
effect, that everybody loves to be fooled. He was right and he was
close to a more profound truth finally articulated by Dr. Albert Ellis:
"The phenomenon of biological inertia creates a powerful resistance
to change of any kind, including that of an irrational belief system."
My amateur translation is: although we readily allow ourselves to be
fooled even in the presence of our own intellectual skepticism, we
hate being told that we have been fooled and especially that we have
abetted the process. We also hate the bother - the discomfort - of
actually changing those belief systems.
Atheism as A High
Hunting down and destroying irrational beliefs in our own minds is
the sweaty side of Atheism as therapy. There's also a side that feels
good, as Atheism feels good in so many ways. Like when you have
adroitly debated a religious nut out of his holy socks; like when you
Page 18
September, 1984
realize there really isn't any such thing as "sin" and we are absolutely
free to make appropriate ethical choices based on evidence and
reason. Freedom of the mind! That feels fantastic! Taking pride, not
embarrassment, in our intellects, freeing ouselves of guilt and other
fears, learning to like ourselves just because we exist and exulting in
our abilities just because we possess them! These are some of the joys
of advanced Atheism, and they feel as good as the natural fun of
laughing, far better than any momentary high we used to get from our
drugs.
But how to get there from the place where a substance is
cannibalizing our bodies and minds, or from the place where
withdrawal from it has us climbing out of our skins or so depressed we
couldn't care less whether our skins stay on or not?
Again Dr. Ellisrides (in a New York cab) to the rescue. He helps us
realize that the same inertia has us clinging to even the most painful
beliefs about ourselves, neurotic beliefs which are usually associated
with addiction. What's more we continually reindoctrinate ourselves
with painful b.s., due mostly to the fact that it never occurred tous to
stop, says Ellis. This does not, he cautions, deny the role of the
unconscious in perpetuating the neurosis, but recognizes the role of
the conscious mind in constantly reimplanting neurotic ideas into the
unconscious, obviously at the urging of another part of the unconscious.
This is the famous. vicious circle - but with a twist. The culprit isn't
"them," it's us.
Perhaps the pain started with our mommies, daddies, teachers and
preachers, but those fools are not in control anymore. So how come
their nonsense hasn't faded away, along with the hots we had for cute
little so-and-so in Mrs. Whoosit's class? The answer is that we
stopped indoctrinating ourselves about little so-and-so but we
continue to indoctrinate ourselves about ourselves, because we can't
get away from ourselves. Not even with Timothy Leary's magical
LSD! (Turns out Leary was a boozer long before he became an acid
head, according to his new book, Flashbacks.)
Upon accepting the idea of self-indoctrination, the advanced
Atheist wants to know how to stop the process.And here's where I
refer you to the reading list at the end of this.article and/or to a
professional- hopefully one who is listed in your:yellow pages as an
RET (Rational Emotive Therapy) practitioner. It may seem expensive, but to paraphrase the mechanic in the TV commercial, pay a
shrink now or pay a lawyer (and maybe a surgeon) later.
In that reading list you'll find listed a book that is a concession to the
fierce desire of most addicts to "do it themselves." Maxie C.
Maultsby, who used RET to develop an excellent method, explains all
in his A Million Dollars for Your Hangover. The unfortunate title
refers to a U.S. government grant of $1 million toward the development of an alternative program to Alcoholics Anonymous. My only
disagreement with it is that it does not recognize the importance of a
group support system.
\..
A sample: "I'll be okay; I'llcut back (tomorrow) (after the party next
Saturday) (as soon as I get a good job) (as soon as I quit this rotten
job) (after the holidays) (after the football season) (etc.)." These are
allways of telling ourselves we may have a bad habit but it's not really
a terminal disease, and we could learn to drink moderately if only the
circumstances were right. Or, that quitting "must be so hard I won't
try."
Some more samples: "If I quit drinking/drugging I'll lose all my
(football buddies) (bowling friends) (office associates) (girlfriends)
(boyfriends) (etc.)." And here's the worst: "No problem. I don't miss it
at all. This is a piece of cake. You're making way too much of it."
It's not too difficult to feel guilty ifyou have victimized yourself with
such irrational faith systems. We are placed in the screwy position of
having to diagnose ourselves! How can we not have some dumb ideas
about our chemicals and ourselves? Or if we find a professional who
has the guts to confront his own drugging in order to diagnose ours
and hecallsus alcoholic, we are in the position of accepting his word
without hard evidence from the hard sciences to confirm the circumstantial evidence. Alcoholism is the number one killer in the country,
and there are no lab tests to help convince us that we're dealing with
life and death.
Iwas in a "morning after" session during one of my stays at detox (a
detoxification clinic), still in denial myself, and the meeting was being
led by an achingly beautiful counselor who was saying we had to find
out why we drank. A grizzled old (before his time) construction
worker with a hangover asked her, "What do you really know about
alcoholism?"
"Unfortunately we don't know very much yet," she answered
honestly, blushing prettily.
"Do you drink?" he demanded.
"Occasionally. But very little. My husband says I'm a cheap date
because I only ... "
"There you have it," rasped the man. "We drink because we drink."
The poor woman flushed, stammered and spun on her heel, in pants
that were far too tight for a place of mostly men who were already in
pain; she undulated away down the hall, followed by all of the bleary
Austin, Texas
Atheists Have
A Distinct Advantage
As Atheists we have at least some practice in recognizing myths
and cons and in debunking them with both facts and reason. More to
the point, we accept that this is the one lifewe're ever going to get and
we have to make it as productive and enjoyable as possible now, not
in some later never-never land in the sky.
Even so, some of us may be holding on to beliefs that originated in
religion - that it is somehow immoral or sinful to have messed with
psychoactive drugs in the first place. Or that our dissipation was the
result of low character, poor morals or "shortcomings," as Alcholics
Anonymous and other churches continue to preach. Atheism's
advantage is that it can cure 'such sick thinking, and that's a very big
benefit.
It also helps us take full responsibility for the rest of our lives. True,
alcoholism is a disease, but that doesn't make it okay. After we know
that, any further rationalization of substance abuse is suicidal, and
Atheists should be the last ones to indulge in suicidal behavior.
Should be.
September, 1984
Cont'd. on p.22
Page 19
SUMMER
SOLSTICE
PICNIC
Page 20
September, 1984
Austin, Texas
September, 1984
Page 21
ATHEISM AS THERAPY
Cont'd {romp.19
over the centuries in curbing violence, but then guilt is the main theme
of the Bible.
Guilt is a form of fear, which produces the fight or flight response.
Neither fight nor flight is an appropnate response to addiction, yet
'what usually happens when you start pushing an addict's guilt buttons
is a succession of anger, resentment, rebelliousness and attack.
Tell a person he or she has asthma and you might get some sadness
and grief, but seldom anger or attack.
Most drinkers started drinking as an act of rebellion; of growing up
and doing as we damned well pleased. To use the old parental
shame-shame approach is to awaken that rebellious child of TA
(Transactional Therapy) fame.
An Atheist therapist, on the other hand, would take a nonjudgmental, empathetic approach and work toward dissipating the
client's own guilt by emphasizing the physiological nature of his
problem and the need for medical hospitalization to get past the
withdrawal stage.
Dr. Maultsby says at least twenty-five percent of all heavily involved
drinkers die from withdrawal and that only a real medical hospital and
a doctor who is experienced in withdrawal can provide the preventative measures and emergency treatment the patient willneed in case
of seizure, D.T.'s (delirium tremons), heart attack, suicidal episode
and other traumas. Most detoxes and Alcholic Anonymous groups
believe religiously in cold turkey. The only way to get any medication
is to say that you have had seizures in the past. Remember that ifyou
ever get stuck in a detox - tell them you've had seizures before. I
personally watched two miserable victims flipout, one of whom didn't
make it back. There is absolutely no excuse for that. unless vou
believe the addict did it to himself and he is supposed to suffer so he'll
remember the ordeal. You want to know what he'll remember? The
craving! That's all I remember from detox; that and not being able to
remember what football teams were playing on T.V. Whew! If you
want me to recall craving, even now going on four years abstinence,
all you have to do IS mention detox. But I have mental defenses now.
Irrational Beliefs
about Ourselves
Here's just a sampling of some of the irrational beliefs with which Dr.
Ellis says neurotics, including alcoholic neurotics, continue to reindoctrinate ourselves. I have interpolated only slightly for space.
I. It is dire necessity for an adult human being to be loved or
approved of by virtually every significant
other person in his
community.
2. One should be thoroughly competent, adequate and achieving in
all possible aspects if one is to consider one s self worthwhile.
3. Certain people are bad, wicked or villainous and should be
severely blamed and punished for their villainy.
4. It is awful and catastrophic when things are not the way one
would very much like them to be.
5. If certain outside forces were different, I would not be so
miserable.
6. If something is dangerous or fearsome one should be terribly
concerned and keep dwelling on the possibility of its occurring.
7. It is easier to avoid than to face certain life difficulties and self
responsibilities.
8. One should be dependent on others and need some one stronger
than ones self on whom to rely.
9. One s past history is an all-important determiner of one s present
behavior, and it should have a similar effect indefinitely.
10. There is invariably a right, precise and perfect solution to human
problems and it is catastrophic if this perfect solution is not found.
September, 1984
irrational beliefs.
conscious processes.
things or ideas, and to have some kind of important human
Now here comes the turning point. I became more and more self
involvement. "
reliant, self directed and self confident. In spite of some objections
I would add that it should be something distinctly one's own thing,
from some parts of my unconscious, I came to like myself as myself. I apart from career, home, family and perhaps even apart from your
learned to enumerate my positive characteristics and my talents as I recovery program, and it would help ifit is something you have always
had never been able to do before, even over the now meek opposition
wanted to do. Some people get deeply involved in alcohol and drug
of my infantile unconscious characters.
rehabilitation work, but I wonder ifthat provides the gratification and
The whole challenging process started slowly and felt awkward at
pleasure we're looking for here.
first, but it accelerated and became more streamlined as I persistently
Build a boat, take a course, learn a new sport, join a group, audition
blasted each and every left-over bit of superstitious and religious
for community theatre, lift weights, restore old houses, vounteer for
nonsense that surfaced. Finally it stopped surfacing at all. I have
community do-good projects, make home movies, take up the. guitar,
become almost totally self directed, at least emotionally, though I still or whatever happens to appeal uniquely to you.
have a couple of addictions: caffeine and nicotine.
Please, you know I don't mean activities such as holding up banks,
But dig this - I now work seemingly without effort; that is without
wrestling gorillas, or raiding dormitories. You know what I mean. Get
the opposition of those twits in my head. And I have started and
involved in something that absorbs your interest and gives you
stayed with an at-horne exercise program. I have lost weight. I'm
enormous enjoyment. And if the joy wears off, get a new thing. Stay
more assertive with clients and others. There's too much to list, and
vitally wrapped up in something all your very own. It sounds selfish,
not everything of course is perfect, but most amazingly I have learned
but it's in Ellis' list, so you can say, "Doctor's orders."
to compartmentalize my time and to disallow the undue impositions
What a far cry from turning your life over to some cruel, browof associates in business, in my Turning Points group, in my chapter
beating diety and its human manipulators! Its' an even further cry
of American Atheists, and in my family. I can now control, to some
from just sitting around and being miserable. A miserable addict is
extent, the amount and kind of impositions people try to unload on
one at risk of a relapse. A wound-up, happy addict with an important
me, sometimes accepting, sometimes gently rejecting and sometimes
involvement and adquate mental defenses has little to fear except self
delegating responsibility. In my advertising business, wherein slavish
deception. ~
obeisance is the official religion, I am now able to calmly wave aside
unreasonable deadlines and in the next breath innocently insist upon
payment up front. Fast deadlines and slow payment are also part of
advertising theology,justified by the traditional creed: "That's just the
Reading List
way this crazy business is." As the world's longest surviving matador
Ellis, Albert, Ph.D. Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy, New
once said, "Ole - my arse!"
Oh with what dismay did my family, my alky friends and my Atheist York: Institute for Rational Emotive Therapy. 1962.
chapter friends view this emerging independence and self control! But
they are becoming less abusive, less intrusive, and more self reliant all Ellis, Albert, Ph.D. Humanist Psychotherapy: The Rational-Emotive
the time. Clients are more respectful, although not the least bit more Approach, New York: Institute for Rational Emotive Therapy. 1974.
honest. That will never happen. These are all basic principles of
Maultsby, Maxie c., M.D. A Million Dollars for Your Hangover,
effective time management.
Tome, as a recovered addict, it adds up to less stress, and that is New York: Institute for Rational Emotive Therapy. 1983.
extremely important. As a result of less external and internal stress,
my memory is improved and my efforts are more productive. Just
getting sober won't automatically bring all these benefits. I'm Catalogue of R.E.T. Materials
convinced they come directly and indirectly from the conscious act of
This catalogue is free and IS an essential part of the resources of every
finallypulling the other foot out of church.
Atheist booze addict, and every other addict, for that matter. Books
range from $3.50 for paperbacks to $29.95 for big hardbacks; there
Quitting Is Negative;
are audio tape and videotape cassettes, and much more. Just
Starting Is Positive
knowing there are such enlightened resources available elevates my
Not doing something is not consistent with evolved human attitude several notches.
behavior. Not drinking or drugging runs counter not only to our
Available from:
physical addictions but also to our instinctive need to do something
Institute
for
Rational-Emotive Therapy
about a given situation. Hungry? Go find food. Invaded? Fight or run.
45 E. 65th. St.
Cold? Wrap up in a bear skin. Confused? Invent a religion. Go do
New York, New York 10021
something about it, whatever it is. That's the way our species evolved,
so not doing is disconcerting, even frightening. This is where the
meetings can help and where going to therapy is so valuable. Right or
wrong, at least it's doing something.
And it's also where Criterion Number Seven takes on surpassing
importance in the list of "Ten Criteria for Vigorous Emotional Health"
published in Recovery, a monthly publication of American Atheist
Addiction Recovery Groups (AAARG,) Volume I, No.1 (July, 1983).
(Reproduced at the end of this article - ed.) In the original list
published by Dr. Ellis, number seven (7) read "COMMITMENT." We
hope he'll forgive us, but our group changed it to "INVOLVEMENT,"
because it can and does change.
Our substances certainly went along with other activities at times,
especially in the early stages of addiction, but for much of the time
doing the substance was the main activity, the only activity - the
involvement. Not doing it anymore leaves a huge time and interest
gap, and boredom is another deadly enemy of the addict. Criterion
Number Seven reads, "INVOLVEMENT. To be vitally absorbed in
something outside of one's self, whether it is embodied in people,
Austin, Texas
September, 1984
Page 23
Page 24
September, 1984
man, nor by god. They're right. It is not a matter of politics: the means.
It is a matter of ethics: the ends.
Before the sixties, prayer was in fullswing; never questioned, never
even thought about. Why think about the taken-for-granted? Then
the axe fell. The faithful were stunned, sent reeling; out of the public
schools and into their churches. They never knew what hit 'em. Their
first reaction was to remove their children from atheistic "contamination" and enroll them in private schools. "We accept defeat,"
they said. "We'll pick up our marbles and play in our own backyard."
For the last twenty years this has been the case. Only a few eager-forthe-vote politicians tried half-hearted ways of getting around the basic
decision, the decision that prayer is not a part of education - public
education, that is.
But now it's different. It's not a matter of Johnny's having to endure
Jane's sotto voce A.M. Sermonette. This time prayer is good, with a
capital G. And he who is silent: be damned. Notice, no one is against
prayer as such. Most even say it's a good thing - even in the schools.
Good, that is, provided you keep it to yourself. Opponents don't
object to prayer as a. political question. They just don't like the
answers they're hearing from those proponents of loud-and-legal
prayer. But proponents do understand the ethics of the situation and a moral cop-out when they hear one. Now they willuse the silent
assent of the too-silent majority and blackmail us all with a Constitutional change that gets them back into the schoolyard. They willhave
prayer; they will have it heard; and anyone who says "nay" will be
socially excommunicated. After all, "we really agree that there is a
God, and that He is good, and that He is just, and that He simply
wants a little adoration now and then." Taking a cue from their defeat
of the Equal Rights Amendment, they're now clamoring for the blood
of the Infidel. This time we just might lose, becoming the spoils they
divide amongst themselves.
We have only one weapon: the weapon of ideas, the weapon of
reason. We must cut the Gordian knot entangling politics and
religion, demanding the answer to a single question: Can someone
claim rights while denying those self-same rights to others?
Can someone who wants to pray demand that you pay for it? Can
someone who wants to speak up demand that you be his audience?
Can a mob of someones who want to lift theireyes demand that your
neck be raised as well? Can someone who wants to satiate his god
demand that you join in, ifonly in silent consent? Must someone else's
"good" be made the standard for you to live up to?
Hear the whistle blow? ~
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bret Jason Sinclair is an inventor (with patents
on laser scanning devices, mechanical drive trains,
and dental instruments);
an author
(currently working on a book dealing with
the psychology of 'being sold'
whether real estate or a bill of goods);
and an enterprenuer (with two current business projects).
A short piece by his wife, Barbara Sinclair,
appeared in
the Potpourri section of the May, 1984, issue of the
American Atheist.
The American Atheist
T. Robert Grace
distinct "edge," but the universe, as we can ever possibly know it, is a
finite quantity.
A common question is asked: "What lies outside of the universe?"
In terms of reality, there is no "outside of the universe;" it is an
essentially nonsensical question. Anything could lie beyond the
"event horizon"; the universe could extend indefinitely, or the great
imperial squid could be out there, but there is no way we can detect it,
so It is not assumed to exist.
A recent fallacy is the idea that plants have intelligence. As a result,
many people talk to plants, thinking that the plants are consciously
aware. It may be that even rocks have intelligence, perhaps human
intelligence. All forms of inanimate matter could have some form of
consciousness for that matter, but even if they did, the fact remains
that there is no way we can detect or measure such intelligence.
Now I think it is important to mention god concepts. One can easily
find someone to claim that a god exists. I would, of course, ask this
person to prove that. And, as I'm sure you've guessed, the person
would demand that I prove that the god doesn't exist. This, in a sense,
is a self-incriminating statement.
Many people have the problem of interpreting unprovability as
proof. This is especially evident in the creationist farce. (That point
alone should be enough to convince anyone in doubt that creationism
is not a science.) I can no more disprove the existence of the Christian
god than I can the existence of any other god. So if one follows the
religionists' reasoning, if my inability to disprove the existence of the
Christian god proves that it exists, then it also stands as proof that
Zeus, Athena, Rha, Osiris, Quetzalcoatl, Thor, and so on exist just as
well. That is self-incriminating because in Christianity, as in most
other religions, I suspect, it is stated unequivocably that the god or
gods of the particular religion are the only ones that really exist.
God concepts then, being completely immeasurable, are nothing
more than a vacuum or darkness - nonexistences: the absence of
matter, the absence of light (and the absence of intelligence).
God concepts were originally formed out of ignorance. What
makes the sun shine? - god. What causes earthquakes? - god.3
Hence, Isaac Asimov has referred to god as a one-syllable sound
meaning "I don't know." God ideas are a completely immeasurable
cause for observable events, and that's where science comes in. As a
result, divine creation, that age-old untested hypothesis concerning
the origin of life, began to be shaken by the scientific community.
With the idea of life in mind, I think it is important to mention the
idea of extraterrestrial life, the subject of increasing concern in
science today. I recently attended a lecture about extraterrestrial life
where a professor was describing the circumstantial evidence that
hints at the possibility of life other than that on Earth. At the
conclusion I heard a person in the audience grunt: "There's a
difference of opinion here! I really think we're alone."
I can understand that, certainly. The discovery of civilized (and I
use the term loosely) lifeforms other than our own would shake world
religions by the neck. Ah, but the fool, if only he really knew what he
was saying. His assertion is as valid as one in religion, but he no more
plans to have his idea tested than any religionist does. To prove the
negative case, that is, that' extraterrestrial life does not exist, would
3The Greco-Roman mythology had a little variety, at least. These
questions would be answered by Helios, Apollo, and monsters
imprisoned in the Earth. It is for this reason that I always found the
christian god idea to be a rather generic form of mythology, and not
nearly as interesting.
September, 1984
Page 25
READER SERVICE
SEND A GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONI
(Please Print)
City
State
--LZip
TO SUBSeR/BETO AMERICAN
MAGAZINE OR TO RENEW
YOUR PRESENT SUBSCRIPTIONI
ATHEIST
_
(Plea""
Print)
City
State
Zip
categories
o Individual; $40/yr
o 65+/unemployed*;
o
o
Name
Spouse/PartnerName
Addres~s
Page 26
September, 1984
-r
(Please Print)
City
State
--LZip,
4Robert Jastrow didn't seem to think so in his book, God and the
Astronomers. About all I can say about it was that I was profoundly
shocked when I first read it.
_
(Please Print)
Ba nk Code'
Signature
_
Exp. Data
_
Date,
Lowell Newby
HAPPINESS AND
THE ATHEIST
~
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Lowell Newby is a freelance writer whose article, "The Day
After," appeared in the February issue of American Atheist.
About himself he writes, "I am especially proud of being from
Mississippi, because it is the home of such outstanding Atheist
activists as John Marthaler and Paul Tirmenstein."
"Being introspective by nature, my interest in Atheism centers
around the innermost effects that it has upon the individual,
particularly one who lives in a theistic environment such as we
now have in the United States. I would suspect that, rather
than being an isolated fact about themselves that Atheists
happen to have in common, their Atheism is a clue to many
other positive similarities that have yet to be identified.
Public knowledge of these similarities would do much
to elevate our position in our society."
September, 1984
Page 27
What is Atheism?
Atheism is a basic position ... a way of life in which logic and reason
dictate and where scientific explanations stand as they are proven to
be until evidence is put forth. Atheism accepts evolution and always
questions ... pursuing an answer by using reason and the scientific
method. Atheism is, also, a form of materialism; however, I feel ... a
more "up to date" version ... much more refined and polished.
Atheism is the ultimate label for the individual thinking man/woman.
An Atheist knows that every man/woman can be and, indeed, should
be responsible for his/her actions completely.
September, 1984
POETRY
Dawn
dawn's joy says
I will make this my greatest day,
dawn's pride says
celebrate the pinnacle you are,
dawn's health says
it's your responsibility,
dawn's learning says
show meticulous regard for sources,
dawn's justice says
give as received,
dawn's respect says
everyone's deserving
dawn's wit says
provoke a smile, share a laugh
dawn's desire says
I am something to be overcome,
dawn's consciousness says
sow here ... reap now,
dawn's wisdom says
see the snail,
dawn's enjoyables say
find me only through experimentation,
and dawn's love says still,
make of me what you will.
castes
E. J. K.
Autumn
Beth M. Applegate
September, 1984
Page 29
TOWARDS NATIONAL
INTEGRATION
nJanuary of this year top government officials, political leaders of
all hues, chief ministers of the states, and representatives from
industry met in conclave in New Delhi for a meeting of the
National Integration Council. Most Indians are unaware that such a
body even exists, though this was the second time it met after
November. 1980.
At the first marathon meeting which lasted nine hours, these very
important people indulged in a great deal of pontification about how
vital it has now become that we think of ourselves first as Indians and
only after that as Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Parsi, Sikh, Jain,
Buddhist and whatever else.
Or again, first as Indians and only then as Brahmin, Kshatrya,
Vaishya, Shudra, Harijan or a few thousand other castes and
subcastes.
Or again, first as Indians and then as Punjabi, Tamilian, Bengali,
Assamese, Kashmiri, Gujarati, Bihari and so on to a further few
hundred regional ethnic groups and subnationalities,
Or yet again, as Indians With our nrst loyalty to the national
language of Hindi and only after that to our individual languages of
Puniabi, Tamil, Bengali, Assamese, Gujarati, Marathi and so on to
countless other languages, dialects and subdialects,
This enumeration of communities, castes, regional groups and
regional languages is to give you some idea of how mind-boggling our
predicament is. I doubt if you will find many genuine Indians
throughout the length and breadth of this country. We are in a
well-defined minority.
The second meeting of the National Integration Council, therefore,
was to impress on people the need for a vigorous intellectual and
moral campaign against communalism, casteism, regionalism and
linguistic fanaticism. The delegates also discussed the role of the
press and radio in promoting national integration.
A list of do's and don'ts was drawn up which makes amusing
reading to Atheists who aren't infected by naivete:
DO'S
a. Speak kindly and appreciatively of the common points of
the various religions and the features which unite all Indians.
b. Mix with people of different persuasion and visit their
religious places if there is no objection, and, if not objected to,
on social and other occasions, too.
c. Articulate the contribution of poets, authors and playwrights of other religions and languages to the unity of India.
d. Condemn writings that are scurrilous and likely to wound
the religious feelings of others. Strengthen the hands of local
government functionaries in their efforts to promote the
communal harmony.
DON'TS
a. Do not criticise or belittle or ridicule the tenets and
observances of other religions.
b. Do not use loudspeakers and amplifiers in public places,
especially in places of worship, in such a way as to cause
nuisance to others and in particular not to hurt the religious
feelings of other communities.
September, 1984
~"'---"'~'-"--:-.-~
,6
P
>:
----~.
Austin, Texas
/'
~-=::::;;-
-d~J
September, 1984
Page 31
HISTORICAL NOTES
September, 1984
When the first installment of a regularly scheduled, 15-minute, weekly American Atheist radio series on
KTBC radio (a station in Austin, Texas owned by then-president Lyndon Baines Johnson) hit the airwaves
on June 3, 1968, the nation was shocked. The programs had to be submitted weeks in advance and were
heavily censored. The series was concluded on October 18, 1975 when no further funding was available.
very white hair, looking much like a Kewpee doll. He was then 77
years old. In 1925 he had formed an organization in New York known
as the AAAA, that is the American Association for the Advancement of Atheism. He had come to visit me in Baltimore, Maryland, to
see if he could help somehow on our legal case.
Smith had been born in Arkansas. He had attended the Epworth
University of Oklahoma as a young adult because he desired to
become a Methodist minister. He was also employed as a law clerk for
the State Code Commission in Oklahoma and was admitted to
practice law in that state in 1910. In the state library, as he worked
toward his law degree, he accidentally came across a book, Jefferson's Bible.
to say that if the store were not closed, it would be wrecked. Finally
Rotenberry, with Sergeants Prewitt and Sellers, went to make a
formal arrest of Smith. The verbal charge was that Smith was "riding
roughshod over the authorities" and in an exchange it developed that
there could be no charges, for he was doing nothing, and so he was
advised that he needed a permit. He was selling nothing - he knew
the ordinances - but he was arrested anyway. He was released on
his own recognizance as bail and promised to appear before Judge
Harb in municipal court the next morning at 8:30 a.m. When Smith
got into court the next morning, the judge read aloud a city ordinance
which forbade the use of the name of the deity except in "veneration
and worship." He then asked all present to be sworn in. Smith stated
that he was an Atheist and would need to affirm and not to swear, at
which point the court records indicate that Judge Harb stated,
."You're an Atheist? You don't believe in God?" Smith stated, "Yes,
sir;" and the judge said, "Then you can't be sworn and cannot testify
in my court."
September, 1984
Page 33
furnish bail, and the third stated that he did not dare because of
political reasons. A fourth bondsman agreed to go bond.
Smith never got a chance to say anything in that court room but
one "Yes, sir." It is important to look at Arkansas law. Article 4177 of
the Arkansas Statutes provides: "Every person who shall declare that
he has conscientious scruples against taking an oath or swearing in
any form shall be permitted to make his solemn declaration or
affirmation in the following form: 'I do solemnly and truly declare and
affirm.' "
Smith had little or no choice. Ifhe paid his fine, and tried to open up
the storefront again, another fine would be imposed, and another and
another. If he paid his fine and left town, he would be defeated. He
chose as a protest to nullifyhis bond at his own request, and work out
the fine at the rate of $1.00 a day. He knew that the press would be
inquiring after him during those twenty-five days and that he could
keep alive the evolutionary issue and the issue of freedom of speech
for that time also. He remained in jail and went on a hunger strike.
In the meantime he sent telegrams to the mayors of the principal
cities of Arkansas to this effect:
"Do Atheists enjoy in your city equal rights with other
citizens, and would you protect them in the propagation of their
convictions? I desire to open headquarters for the distribution
of evolution tracts and antireligious literature, to help defeat the
antievolution referendum bill. Advise collect," signed Charles
Smith, address City Jail, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Charlie Smith spent twenty-six days in jail, working off his fine. He
had plenty of time to read the replies which came in. twill read some of
them to you now.
From Fayetteville where the state university is located: "No Atheist
willbe permitted to open headquarters in this city for distribution of
antireligious literature, and any attempt to do so will result in a jail
sentence." Signed Allan M. Wilson, mayor. It should be noted that no
professor of that university had the courage to come forward to assist
Smith.
"From Fayetteville (Arkansas) ... : 'No Atheist will be permitted to open headquarters in
this city for distribution of antireligious literature and any attempt to do so will result in a jail
sentence.' ... - the mayor. It should be noted
that no professor of (Fayetteville's) university
had the courage to come forward to assist
Smith."
From Helena: "Neither you nor any other Atheist willbe permitted
to distribute antireligious literature nor to open headquarters in
Helena, and I warn you to stay away." D.T. Hargrave, mayor.
From Hot Springs: "Our city has been commendably free from
Atheism. It is my intention to see that it remains so. In the event you
should, as a private citizen and visitor, desire to come here and take a
course of our world famous mineral baths, which might boil that
unholy doctrine out of you, every courtesy consistent with Southern
hospitality will be shown to you. but you will not be permitted to
promulgate a doctrine that is most repulsive and violates every
tradition of Christianity.''' Leo P. McLaughlin, mayor.
From Pine Bluff:"The Constitution of the United States is based on
the existence of a Supreme Being. Atheists and their literature are not
desired in this city. Yours would be objectionable and forbidden." W.
L. Toney, mayor
From Jonesboro: "Will do my best to extend full protection of law
to every man regardless of belief. But Jonesboro does not want any
Atheists. In view of attitude of local population toward your cause I do
not believe it would be advisable to open headquarters. Am personally opposed to you and your methods." Eli Collins, mayor.
Iwonder what happened in Arkansas in 1928 to the idea of freedom
of speech, as protected by our Constitution.
Page 34
September, 1984
**
1 COPY
$4.00
2 - 9 COPIES
$3.00
10 OR MORE
$1.75
**
\'
~~~~
...........
CONTRIBUTIONS,
national existence is a "precious" thing! Does this then imply that the
Russians did not contribute to world society? I suppose that would
depend on one's point of view. German Nationalists of the 1940's
would probably vote "no." If you were a Western Ally you would
probably still vote "no" simply because, as everyone knows, the
U.S.S.R. has lost favor and is now viewed as a evil atheistic
communist nation. How childish the human mind really is! Yet, it is
not the human mind that is childish but rather it is the human mind
that, by and large, does not contribute to the curtailing of powers
issued to those who are responsible for the degenerate national
leadership of world communities.
Someone once said, "Wouldn't it be funny if they (whoever they
might be) had a war and no one came." What a contribution to society
that would be! Ifevery potential soldier simply told the leaders to go to
heck - what would war be like? How many times has that question
arisen throughout history?
This brings us to another segment of "contributions" - the
contributions of the mentally ill. The particular variety of mentally ill
persons to which I am referring is not the variety you might expect to
see cutting paper dolls in some psychiatric ward. I mean the ones you
meet on the street or see in any ordinary community setting - the
ones who willdo the military's bidding without hesitation. Those who
will, with robot efficency, take a high-powered rifle, slink on to a
battlefield and shoot the heart and lungs out of someone they don't
even know. But then, that is now a rather antiquated method of
soldiering. High technology today enables one to push a button and
destroy hundreds of thousands of folks we can't even see!
The problem seems to lie in the fact that people don't make
contributions in the manner they, themselves, would like. The
contributions most people make are required contributions necessitated by circumstances. You provide what is demanded of you by
"authority" under penalty of punishment or due to economic
pressure. Because of inadequate basic education nations of people
conform:
(1) under threat of "damnation," to the whims of insane religious
leaders,
(2) under threat of prosecution, to the whims of equally insane
political leaders,
(3) under social intimidation, to the whims of parents and associates.
Whatever became of the contributions that you, as a person, would
like to make to the world - and in your own chosen style? Do you, for
instance, wish that you could make certain contributions to society in
areas in which you feel you may not be sufficiently qualified? Don't
you have a few private likes and dislikes that you, for personal
reasons, willnot divulge let alone have scrutinized and/or critized by
others? Many people, through necessity, engage in occupations
dictated by circumstance but would rather be involved in other
activities. Some qualified farmer might have preferred to be an artist
- some "decorated war hero" might rather have been a great poet!
Consider the things that you have done in your lifetime - jobs,
avocations, etc. Are they really the things that you might have done if
the world had been different and ifyour personal choices had actually
been open to you?
I can only wonder about these things like everyone else. Here I am,
writing for an Atheist magazine. Ifthe world had been a sane, rational
place, there might never have been a need for such a journal! Yet,
what I am trying to do is as much dictated by circumstance as
anything that you may now be doing, and probably for the same
September, 1984
Page 3S
reasons you may be doing them. The need for an Atheist magazine
and its contributors is as clear as is the need for better world-wide
education. I can only hope that what I write may, in some small way,
help to improve some of the wrongs or at least encourage others to
try to make similar improvements in ways that are open to them.
I recently asked Dr. O'Hair a question that I knew was virtually
unanswerable: "Were it not for the historical insanities incurred
under centuries of intellectual suffocation at the hands of religion,
what other course might she have followed?" It is quite apparent that
she might have become one of the nation's finest legal counselors. But
then, she might also have preferred to be the above mentioned
painter or poet. At any rate, the choice was not really hers. In certain
instances, in cases that are all too rare, human conscience obligates
the actions of the few. Other people might call it sacrifice. But it is not
"sacrifice" that causes commendable action - it is simply dedicated
desire that builds within some people thereby resulting in unique
contributions to society and thus, ultimately, to themselves.
Societal contributions are the essence of pleasurable existence!
People simply feel good when they realize that they have done
something constructive and that their efforts are appreccated - even
if that appreciation is late in coming.
Part II Idols
But what ifcertain people feel "insecure" or "inferior?" What ifthey
think that they could never contribute in a meaningful way? Take a
good look at the essence of religion; how could a "mere mortal" do
anything that would, in any way, compare to the accomplishments of
a "god?" We (the insignificant ones) must there(ore cherish and
worship the "gods!" We must build statues in honor of their
magnificence! Rather degrading isn't it? But personal degradation
does not stop there. "We" also build idolizing statues of emperors and
kings, of actors and educators, of atheletes and heroes. And so we
even come to worship mortals - those mortals to whom we imagine
ourselves to be comparatively inferior. With all of the worshipping
that has gone on in history one would think that, surely, there have
been enough "gods," mortal and "immortal," to have straightened
the world out by now. Something must have gone wrong along the
way. It did! People have wasted their time worshipping instead of
doing. Is it because, basically, people are lazy and worshipping is
easier than strife? Or, is it that most people have been so devastated
by their imagined inferiority that they are no longer capable of being
productive? Are we then to be graded by whether or not someone
fashions a cement likeness of us? If that is the only criterion for
greatness why doesn't some enterprising person make a business of
building plaster replicas of everyone? For a few hundred dollars you
could have your own personal "idol" made in your likeness - for
posterity. You could even have a laudable inscription molded into the
pedestal! Then the world would have an infinite number of idol type
pigeon-roosts. However, the world would also still have the same
problems, the same insanities, as if no statues had ever been built.
Idolization is simply an excuse for apathetic do-nothing-ness.
The real problem is that when anyone in history did anything,
regardless of how little their actions truly improved conditions, and
even if the entire episode stemmed from mythology, someone built a
statue of them - and worshipping ensued. I can't help noticing that
even Atheist Thomas Edison (who has numerous statues dedicated
to his remembrance) was motivated by commercial considerations. I
am caused to wonder; would he have worked as diligently to bring us
the many pleasurable and essential electronic inventions ifhe had not
attracted, through his genius, the corporate support of Wall street
investors and the ultimate personal wealth it afforded him? It's
entirely possible that he would have and I make no effort to belittle his
achievements. But what ifsomeone had already, previously, invented
all those wonderful things? What ifEdison were to have been born 75
years later than he was? Would he still have achived his memorable
greatness? It would seem that circumstance rules everything. Being
the "right" person in the "right" place at the "right" time is a deciding
factor. It determines whether someone might someday build a statue
in your honor. Of course, if you're too busy worshipping statues of
other folks, real or imaginary, time may simply pass you by. So much
for idolization.
Page 36
September, 1984
POTPOURRI
ATHEISM VERSUS SELF-DECEPTION. "The human race has suffered for centuries and is still suffering from the mental disorder known
as religion, and Atheism is the only physician that willbe able to effect a permanent cure." (Joseph Lewis)
It is ironic that the most insidious, pernicious and malignant disease is man-made: religion. Religion exists because people want (not need) to
be deceived. Even religionists have absolute certitude that ifthey jump from the top of the Empire State Building they willplunge to the ground.
No proof is needed. Gravity is an indisputable scientific fact. Yet these same religionists who cannot prove the existence of god still insist all
must believe because of "faith." "Religious faith" is simply another term for self-deception.
It is my conclusion that no rational person truly believes in god, but chooses this path perceiving the only other choice as fear. Accepting the
truth that we (as human beings) are alone in the universe is a terrifying, intolerable fact with which many cannot cope. Therefore, man created
god to disprove his cosmic singularity and to expiate his tortured sense of morality.
Atheists need no scapegoats and consequently are truly free. They exult in the knowledge they answer only to themselves and their fellow
man. Atheists take fullresponsibility for their actions and possess a clear joyous view of lifethat is denied the religionist. "Thus that which is the
most awful of evils, death, is nothing to us, since when we exist there is no death, and when there is death we do not exist." (Epicurus, Greek
philosopher, 332-270 b.c.) The con-men exhort their flocks to renounce this existence for an illusory "future life" paradise. The Atheist knows
the present (now) is the best (and all) there is.
We are all born Atheists. Atheism is in conformity with the natural order of things. The younger the mind contaminated with religion, the
greater the difficulty of becoming a "born-again" Atheist in later years. That is the reason the religionists fanatically do battle for the minds of
children.
Religion has severely retarded man's intellectual and emotional evolutionary progress for nearly two thousand years and, as with any
disease, it must be conquered. The task is formidable but not insurmountable. We must seize every opportunity to proudly proclaim our
Atheism and the total mental freedom, security, confidence and dignity it brings. Unless man destroys himself, Atheism will
triumph. Kenneth J. Schmidt
A SHORT REPORT. "Come in control. This is Deep Space Probe A27 calling control." "Go ahead A27." "We've come upon a blue-green
planet known as Earth and wish to report." "Go ahead A27." "Information is almost too scant for analysis but here goes.":
"About 50,000 years ago human types were abundant, and social structures began to appear. Around 12,000 years ago civilization was
confirmed, and a social phenomenon called mythology-religion began to appear. The development of science and medicine was quite normal
except for some setbacks known as the Dark Ages.
"The shining jewel of this planet was a country called America, which boasted a democratic form of republic, including a constitution and a
three-part checks and balances government. In the late 20th century a fascist group known as the 'ultra right influenced national policy by
utilizing the gullibilityand desire to be subservient of the fundamentalist Christian elements. The fascist group waved the Christian Bible and
used buzz words like 'family,' 'peace,' liberty,' 'freedom,' etc. The fundamentalists, in their futile attempt to understand the origins of morality,
listened to the fascists and fully exercised their gullibility.
"Eventually the President succumbed to the pressures of a dedicated, vocal minority and abdicated just after dissolving Congress. A
committee, known as the 'Committee of Truth,' consisting of three theologians and one political advisor, agreed to run the country. Since the
Committee of Truth was in direct communication with the deity. all questions of state were quickly answered and all voting rights, no longer
being necessary, were suspended. It was decided that the Christian Bible was the only source of guidance and that morality was needed;
therefore, the Constitution was abandoned. Because disease was thought to be caused by sin, medical schools were replaced with perpetual
prayer centers. All technical schools were closed. The Lord will provide.' the committee decided.
"Eventually patriotism was equated with christianity, and later, after a purge, patriotism was possessed by only protestants; Jews, catholics,
etc. being given the chance to repent or leave the country with what they could carry. Special divisions of the military, called "love units,"
, handled the miscreants, sending them to special reeducation centers to learn to accept the gift of 'God's Pure Love.'
"Iran continued to call America the 'Great Satan.' America eventually came to call the rest of the world the 'Great Satan.' After some debate
the committee gave the order to push the button. 'What about the innocents?' someone asked. 'Don't worry about the innocents, the Lord will
know his own,' was the reply.
"Control, Probe A27 suggests another exploratory probe be sent into this sector in approximately four million years. A27 out." Herman
Harris
Austin, Texas
September, 1984
Page 37
Dear Editor,
I am a lifelong Atheist. and as such have
always had extremely minimal interest in the
Bible. I have never bothered to read It, even
when inscribing "Compliments of the author" in Gideons found in hotel rooms (as
my father instructed me.) However, a few
days ago Ihad to transcribe parts of Exodus,
Genesis and Matthew, in the course of my
work and so was forced to read same.
I thought that you would like to know that
I was struck with uncontrollable laughter so badly, in fact, that Iwas glad that Ihave an
office to myself (my boss is a bead fumbler.)
It appeared so grotesque to me that I am
really hard put to understand how anyone
could have any other reaction. Is that what
the world has been taking seriously forever?
Of course, I was spared the gruesome, cruel
and disgusting parts, but believe me, as far
as Genesis, in particular, is concerned it is
hysterically funny. I wonder how many
others share this reaction.
Lynne Bloom
New York
Dear Editor,
Your magazine is deteriorating. The July,
1984, issue was undoubtedly your worst. It
was filled with "blood & guts."
I am a total Atheist, have been for several
years, and I am fully aware of the atrocities
proliferated by religion, but throwing decency to the winds by publishing these bloody
stories is not helping to stem the tide of
religion.
Let's face it. Religion is here to stay.
Ignorance, in the form of superstition, greed,
false hopes and the desire for power, will
keep it strong for centuries to come. Revealing its faults and crimes willnot stop it.
We Atheists should cease griping about
the religious community and start thinking
along the lines of forming our own communities. schools, etc., to educate our children
and to live our lives according to our consciences. Ifreligious groups can do this, why
not we?
Let's buy some land, cultivate it, build our
schools, become self sufficient. We can do
this and still maintain law & order, pay our
taxes, etc. We have the knowhow; the
brains & the education.
Please, no more articles about Mohammedan circumcision & feeding folks to the
lions! How about some articles about our
future.
Very truly yours
Morgan Allspach
Ohio
September, 1984
Dear A. A.:
"Sexual Mutilations and Islam," by the
author with the unpronouncable name. (S.
de Montalvo-Mielche - ed.), in the July,
1984, American Atheist, ISthe most horrendous and sickening religion-inspired cruelty
I have ever read. How ghastly! And to think
that while I write this and while you read this
such butchery is actually going on somewhere. My heart bleeds for the victims and
I'm burning with anger and hatred for the
perpetrators of such criminally stupid religious customs. Imagine doing such insult and
indignity and injury to defenseless children
and women in this day and age! Such
barbarity should be exposed, denounced,
condemned, debunked, shouted down from
the housetops AND STOPPED AT ONCE.
IfI had the power to do so and get away with
it I would enjoy putting the practitioners of
this "art" against the wall and machinegunning them down without mercy to END
this terrible offense against The Body Beautiful. (And to think that while this savagery
goes on, God in His infinite mercy and
wisdon looks down, sees all, and does
nothing. Merely permitting the perpetrators
to exercise their "free will" I suppose.) I'm
convinced more than ever that I am right
when I say that religious beliefis afunction
of stupidity.
Can you supply me with 500 reprints of
this article? If "Yes," how much must I sent
to pay all costs? I want to enclose one in
each letter I mail out, and fight this damnable custom. You are welcome to reply
across the bottom of the letter and mail in
the enclosed reply envelope. HURRY!
Andy Vena
Pennsylvania
Dear Andy,
The reprints are on the way to you. The
female children and women need all the help
they. can get. Stirring up protest against
these customs is essential.
Editor
Dear Editor,
Recently you noted in the magazine that
the phrase "under God" was added to our
Pledge of Allegiance (to the flag) on June
14th, 1954 during the McCarthy reign of
terror. It now says "I pledge allegiance to the
United States and to the republic for which
it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all."
You will be interested to know that in
mid-duly the trivia column of L. M. Boyd,
which is syndicated to many newspapers
had the following about the Pledge of AlleThe American Atheist
Editor,
I am happy to have learned about your
organization through a male friend, and
always read your magazine cover to cover
every month. Your articles are interesting
and informative and often shed light upon
NOTICE
Letters to the Editor must be either
questions or comments of general concern to Atheists or Atheism. Submissions should be brief and to the point.
Space limitations allow that each letter shou Id be 200 words or (preferably)
less. Please confine your letters to a
single issue only. Mail them to:
American Atheists
P.O. Box 2117
Austin, TX 78768-2117
Thank you.
Austin, Texas
September, 1984
Page 39
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENT
Health
Organizations
------
New Baldness
Massage Do-It-
Yourself Therapy
Procedure
Guarantees
Hair Growth
Procedure Discolfered By Team
Of Cosmetologists In Beauty
College Is Helping Millions
CINCINNATI. OHIO (Special)
Experiments uncover new massage
therapy procedure that energizes
and brings to life dormant small sac
like gland cavities called hair
follicles where every hair shaft
erupts from.
These follicles need constant
blood nourishment and nutrients
and must be totally physically fit.
"Each Hair Shaft Lives Only 3
Months To 8 Years"
Each hair shaft grows to a certain
point and then detaches itself (falls
out) hopefully another hair shaft
starts forming in the follicle after
the hair shaft falls out but as the
body can fail itself for lack of
nourishment (malnutrition)
the
follicles can fail their purpose by
staying dormant. The new massage
therapy procedure energizes the
follicles and keeps them in totally
top physical condition by bringing
the blood flow constantly to the furthest part of the follicles so now hair
growth can start and erupt. For
FREE facts and information about
the new break through: Write the
House of Hair Care, 2563 W.N.
Bend Road, Cincinnati,
Ohio
45239, Phone 513-541-3936.
Page 40
Businesses
For fine foods prepared by a fine Atheist
visit:
WES--T RESTAURANT
~,-
~~,
-"
~~~
~ERICAN
GAY
A
in DeQueen, Arkansas
(on Hwy 70 in Southwest Arkansas)
J~;'
'r~&'
tif
\if,
Publications
...
~.
~~...:
~p~
'i
.'il
1';/
"-',
,,,
JHEISTS -~,-,;.-::,,,:~~
Dial-a-Gay-Atheist
(713)
THE MATCH !
The Apex of
Atheistic
Anarchism
'~,
457-6660
GALA
A Press,
Box
2117,
Austin,
TX
78768
{!
Gay Atheist League of America {!
P.O. Box 14142
{!
San Francisco, CA 94114
{!
AAARG'
American
Atheist Addiction
Groups Inc.
Recovery
September, 1984
{t
{t
{t
{r
{r.
{r
{r
{r
{r
{r
{r
15th Annual
1}
1}
1}
1}
National
Convention
of
American Atheists
.)[1
Registration fees now
being accepted
Single $20.00 Couples $35.00
American
*
**
1}
Austin,
1}
1}
1}
1}
1}
1}
1}
SPECIAL OFFER
This book is a 402-page hardback which measures 6% X
9%". The authors are a Jew and a Roman Catholic. They were
Send
copy(ies)
of Holy Terror
$15.00 [Clearance
Price] including
Name
Address
City
State
Zip
[ ] VISA
Number
Expiration
Signature
[ ] MASTERCARD
_
date
....
Bank No.z'Letters,
_
_
AMENDMENTI
CONGRESS