Beach Fire Management Pilot Program 02-03-15

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Council Report
February 3, 2015
To:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Douglas J. Schmitz, City Administrator
From:
Sharon Friedrichsen
Subject:
Consideration of recommendations related to a beach fire

management pilot program
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1) To receive a presentation by the Air Pollution Control Officer of the Monterey Bay
Unified Air Pollution Control District;
2) To consider recommendations pertaining to a beach fire management pilot
program and approve a pilot program;
3) To authorize staff to begin implementation of the pilot program, including submittal
of a coastal development permit to the Coastal Commission;
4) To authorize funding of one police officer position to assist in education and
enforcement of the pilot program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This item is before Council to consider recommendations related to a pilot program to
help manage the recreational use of beach fires. The pilot program does not propose to
ban beach fires. Rather, it includes an approach to prevent fires from being built directly
on the sand and to limit the number of fires, primarily through the use of fire containment
devices. The purpose of this approach is to allow the public to continue to enjoy beach
fires while attempting to mitigate some of the environmental impacts of beach fires on air
quality and the degradation of the sand.
The major components of the beach fire management recommendations developed by
the Forest and Beach Commission include:
Wood-burning fires must be contained within a fire containment device

Use of 26 semi-permanent fire containment devices at five locations
Devices would be on a first come, first serve basis
Devices would be removed seasonally
Unlimited user-supplied propane fire devices allowed south of 10th year-round
Up to five charcoal grill devices (i.e. hibachi type grill) allowed south of 10 th yearround with a free permit obtained from the Carmel Police Department
Enhanced education and enforcement five days a week until 11 PM
1
City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Page 165
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 1
Should Council approve the pilot program, staff will move forward with various
implementation activities to facilitate the start of a pilot program in May. Such activities
include obtaining a permit; purchasing and placement of fire containment devices;
development of public education and outreach materials, including signage; and cleaning
and patrol options, including the hiring of a patrol officer by the Carmel Police
Department to assist in education and enforcement of the pilot program and other rules
pertaining to the Carmel Beach and Shoreline.
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:
One of the 2014 Council key initiatives was to implement the Shoreline Management
Plan, with a strong emphasis on managing beach fires. The Shoreline Management
Plan includes the objective of allowing beach users the opportunity to enjoy a fire for
warmth or cooking, white protecting the sand from degradation (O4-10). This is
accomplished by allowing beach fires until 10 p.m. south of 10th Avenue, but at least 25
feet the base of the bluffs (P4-57).
Accordingly, the Forest and Beach Commission has been actively discussing options
related to beach fires in an effort to balance the recreational activity of beach fires with
strategies to mitigate environmental impacts of air quality and degradation of the sand
associated with beach fires. As part of this process, extensive community engagement
occurred, including15 public meetings and outreach to a variety of local organizations
and community groups. Three public workshops related to the Shoreline Management
Plan and beach fires were held. The Forest and Beach Commission discussed the topic
of beach fires and possible recommendations during ten public meetings. These
meetings included a public tour on the beach and the corresponding public meeting at
city hall on June 25, 2014 where the possible use, number and location of fire rings was
discussed. This meeting in particular received considerable attention by the local media.
The most recent meetings included a December 4, 2014 public workshop by the Forest
The recommendations of the Commission were developed in the context of two guiding
principles: (1) No fires built directly in the sand and (2) Limit the number of fires. These
principles were adopted by Council on August 5, 2014 during a public meeting on the
topic of beach fires. It is the goal of the Forest and Beach Commission that the pilot
program will help achieve the objectives of eliminating charcoal and burned logs from the
sand and reducing the amount of wood smoke produced by beach fires.
On December 11, 2014, the Forest and Beach Commission approved a beach fire
management strategy to develop a pilot program that includes the following key
recommendations:
2
Page 166
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 2
Wood-burning fires must be contained within a fire containment device

The City would purchase and install 26 semi-permanent fire containment devices
at five locations that would be available to the public on a first come, first serve
basis on a seasonal basis
Unlimited user-supplied propane fire devices allowed south of 10th year-round
Up to five charcoal grilling devices (i.e. hibachi type grill) allowed south of 10th
year-round with a free permit obtained from the Carmel Police Department
Enhanced education and enforcement five days a week until 11 PM
On January 21, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed these recommendations and
approved all of the components with the exception of the charcoal grilling devices.
Pilot Program Details:
Number and Location of Wood-Burning Fire Devices: As part of the proposed pilot
program, the City would purchase and install 26 off the shelf fire containment devices,
placed at locations in the cove and near the beach staircases as follows:
2 fire rings near the staircase at 10th

2 fire rings near the staircase at Santa Lucia
4 fire rings in the cove between 10th and 11th
4 fire rings in the cove between 13th and Santa Lucia
The Forest and Beach Commission recommended that no devices be placed at Martin
Way as the cove is traditionally covered in kelp and experiences a higher degree of wave
action. Current fire rules however allow beach fires at this location and this provision
may require possible changes depending on discussions with Coastal Commission staff.
It is possible that the use of propane fire may satisfy this rule or, alternatively, one or two
wood fire containment devices could be added to this location (either with an increase in
the overall number of devices or keeping the total number at 26 and reallocating one or
two devices from other locations). It is also recommended that only dry aged wood or
(lump or briquette) charcoal be allowed to be burned in the devices, due to concerns of
toxics produced from burning salt-laden wood or treated wood, such as pallets.
Device Style, Placement and Cleaning: As this is considered a pilot program, it is
recommended that several commercially made and readily available fire containment
devices be used during the initial phase of the pilot program. Possible devices would be
selected by staff (City Administrator, City Forester and Planning staff). This approach
3
Page 167
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 3
has the advantages of allowing for implementation by May 2015 as well as giving staff
the flexibility to use different models to evaluate the ease and effectiveness of installing,
cleaning and removing rings. Staff would also be able to procure new rings if needed
with greater ease. A variety of models may also assist if a permit system is put in place
(i.e. permits could be issued based on location and device type). Estimated costs range
from $500-$1,500 a piece, which would be $13,000-$39,000 based on 26 devices. The
cost of the devices have not been included within the current fiscal years capital or
operating budget. Should the pilot program continue to the following year (2016), it is
recommended that a design committee be established around September 2015 to create
a device that is customized and based on Carmel design guidelines.
The devices would be placed and removed by City staff (no additional cost as existing
City staff and equipment will be used) on a seasonal basis to prevent the possible loss of
devices due to heightened wave activity. The timing of the removal of the devices will
vary according to the weather and when the tide line reaches the devices. Based upon
recent weather patterns, the devices may likely remain through the typical winter months.
Staff would make a concentrated effort to leave six devices in place during the winter
months, especially closer to 10th Avenue that may be better buffered from the tide. Once
wood- fire devices are removed, only user-supplied propane fire devices would be
allowed. Allowing a return to the status quo of wood burning fires directly in the sand
during winter will make it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot program in
addressing charcoal in the sand and sand degradation.
The wood-fire devices would be secured by burying a chain in the sand and cleaned by
the City (City staff and/or contract with another entity). Currently, the City has a budget
of $25,000 for beach cleanup and utilizes existing staff augmented by temporary labor to
clean the sand of charcoal and other residual materials left from beach fires. This occurs
once a week from Memorial Day through October. Part of the challenge in cleaning up
after beach fires is that the number of fires, the specific locations and the intensity is
unknown and varies each week. Some fires are still smoldering and cannot be cleaned.
The process itself is rather arduous and involves anywhere from 2-6 people placing
charcoal and other debris in trash bags and sifting the sand to remove charcoal. The
City current spends about $200 a day for two temporary staff to work six hours on
charcoal removal, with oversight by one existing City employee. The number of fires that
can be cleaned varies depending on the intensity of the residual fire. The use of
equipment to rake the beach has been explored in the past with mixed results. The
equipment has raked the charcoal and the kelp, leaving grey steaks in the sand. In
addition, kelp, which is considered part of the natural habitat, is also removed from the
beach. Possible benefits of the use of fire devices are that the location and number is
limited; the amount of residual to be cleaned remains fairly constant; and the residual will
be contained within the parameters of the device. The devices can be emptied by lifting
and dumping the devices into a vehicle and/ or vacuuming the content of the devices and
then disposing of the contents properly. The use of the devices may reduce the time and
4
Page 168
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 4
cost of cleaning efforts. One possible operational concern is that the fire devices will be
used as de facto trash cans. However, the combination of a City beach patrol officer and
a beach superintendent employed by the incoming trash hauler (starting in July) should
help deter and respond to this possible scenario.
Permits/ Reservations/Holidays: As the first phase of the pilot program, it is
recommended that the use of the fire containment devices be on a first come, first
serve basis. Usage will be monitored and a reservation and/or permit approach may be
added to the pilot depending on demand and to possibly accommodate preference for
locals, community events or other commercial special events. To address anticipated
increases of beach fire activities during holidays, the Forest and Beach Commission
included a recommendation to provide 25 portable fire devices for public use (again on a
first come, first serve basis) on the July 4th and Labor Day holiday weekends.
The portable devices would be available on site, such as near the restroom at Scenic
and Santa Lucia, and left on the beach for pickup by City staff or City contractors.
Propane and Charcoal Grilling Devices: The objectives of the pilot program are to
eliminate burning charcoal and wood from directly touching the sand and turning the
sand grey and to reduce the amount of smoke from beach fires. One approach to
achieve these two objectives is to allow an alternative type of fuel, such as propane, to
be used. The Forest and Beach Commission has also included the unlimited use of
propane fire devices south of 10th year-round. The devices come in different models, like
the campfire in a can and prices of models researched range from $65-$250 per unit.
At this time, it is recommended that the propane fire devices and accompanying propane
be supplied by the users (pack it in, pack it out approach).
In addition to propane, the Forest and Beach Commission recommended that up to five
charcoal grilling devices (i.e. hibachi grill) also be allowed under the pilot program. This
clause is intended to allow people to barbeque at the beach without having to use one of
the 26 larger fire containment devices. These devices would be supplied by the user
and allowed year-round south of 10th, but require one to obtain a permit, free of charge,
from the Carmel Police Department. This clause was recommended for removal by the
entire Planning Commission during its January 21, 2015 meeting. This recommendation
was primarily driven by concerns that the contents of burned charcoal from the grill
would be dumped in the sand and that rules of 26 no permit fire devices yet five
permitted devices may be confusing to the beachgoers. A suggestion was made to
include grills on some, or all of, the 26 fire containment devices in order to allow the
public to enjoy barbeques at the beach.
Public Education and Outreach: The Forest and Beach Commission recognized that a
pilot program needs active education and enforcement in order to be effective.
Therefore, the Commission has recommended that education and enforcement be
increased to five days a week from 3 pm-11 pm. The use of a police officer, as compared
5
Page 169
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 5
to private security, will allow for the enforcement of beach rules and regulations. This
position will be a necessary component to explain the pilot program rules; monitor its
effectiveness and make recommendations regarding possible changes to the pilot
program based on field observations. In addition, this resource will be able to assist in
addressing other beach-related activities such as animal control, slope cutting and litter.
New signage and an extensive public education campaign, including the use of social
media, will be a necessary part of the pilot program.
FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of the pilot program is $179,000:
Component
Estimated Cost
Budgeted (yes/no) Cleaning ($25,000) and

seasonal security patrols ($40,000) are included
within the current fiscal year operating budget.
Waterfront signage is also funded for $32,000 as a
capital project within the current budget. Mid-year
budget adjustment may be necessary as the
proposed pilot program begins before the start of a
new fiscal year (7/1/). Additional costs for the pilot
program are proposed to be included within the FY
15-16 budget
Funding Source (general fund,

grant, state) General Fund
Fire Devices (26 @$1,000 each)

Portable Devices (25 @ $250 each)
Cleaning
Police Officer
Signage (manufacturing only)
Public Education Collateral
Total
$26,000
$6,250
$25,000
$106,500
$10,000
$5,000
$178,750
The estimated cost of the purchase of the fire devices is $26,000, which is based on 26
devices costing $1,000 each. In addition, up to 25 portable devices for holiday use would
need to be purchased (estimated cost of $250 for a beach fire basket). Costs could be
less for both the semi-permanent and the portable devices based upon the style
selected. Any increase in the number of devices would increase the cost of purchasing
devices as well as incremental costs of cleaning additional devices. Cleaning costs
remain proposed at the current funded level of $25,000. An entry level police officer is
included within the cost of the program for $106,533, which would be offset by funding of
$40,000 allocated toward private security, for a net increase of $67,000. Estimated cost
for manufacturing of new signage is estimated at $10,000. This does not include costs
for a design consultant. An estimated budget of $5,000 for brochures and other public
education collateral has been included as well. It may be possible to utilize the services
of the Citys marketing consultant under the existing contract to help develop materials
and a marketing strategy. If permits should be required, it is proposed that existing
6
Page 170
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 6
community services staff absorb this function and monitor the workload. At this time,
there is no user fee proposed for the use of the fire containment devices.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION/DECISION HISTORY:
Council included beach fire management as part of Shoreline Management Plan

(SMP) implementation as 2014 key initiative on 1/7/14 and held a public workshop
on the SMP and beach fires on 2/3/14
Forest and Beach Commission public meetings on 2/6/14, 3/6/14, 4/3/14, 6/11.14,
6/25/14,7/10/14, 8/28/14,9/11/14, 10/9/14,11/13/14, 12/4/14 and 12/11/14
Council adopted the guiding principles on 8/5/14
Council reiterated support for addressing beach fires as part of 2015 goals on
January 5, 2015
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Supplemental staff report by Chief Calhoun

2. Forest and Beach Commission December 11, 2014 meeting draft minutes
3. Recent public comment
The following items can be accessed on the website at www.ci.carmel.ca.us or
can be viewed at City Hall.
4 . Presentations from the Forest and Beach Commission December 4, 2014 public
workshop: Beach Fires (City staff) and Public Health Impacts Associated with
Wood Smoke Exposure from Beach Fires (MBUAPCD)
5. Public comment from the December 4 , 2014 public workshop
6. Public comment from the January 21, 2015 Planning Commission special meeting
7. Presentation (City staff) from the January 21, 2015 Planning Commission special
meeting
APPROVED:
I
Date:
istrator
::?1 ~~ /5'
7
Agenda Item: 8.C
Page 7

Page 171
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 7
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Council Report
February 3, 2015
To:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From:
Douglas J. Schmitz, City Administrator
Submitted by:
Michael Calhoun, Director of Public Safety
Subject:
Supplemental - Receive report and authorize funding of one Police

Officer position for the Beach/Parks Officer assignment.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Authorize the funding.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In FY2014/15 Public Safety added one police officer position to the budget in anticipation of
funding this position in FY15/16 for the new Beach/Parks patrol assignment. On December
11, 2014 the Forest and Beach Commission approved several recommendations to reduce
the number of fires on the beach and improve the enforcement of beach rules and regulations
to keep our beach safe and clean for our residents and visitors. The recommendations were
approved by the planning commission and will be presented for consideration at the February
council meeting. Adding a full time public safety officer for the specific purpose of the
Beach/Parks officer assignment to the current police department staffing for education and
enforcement of beach rules and regulations is one of the recommendations by the Forest and
Beach Commission.
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:
Presently there are seven police officers authorized in the public safety budget, three
Sergeants, two corporals, one Commander, and the Public Safety Director. Adding an officer
for the Beach/Park patrol assignment will increase the sworn staffing levels in the Police
Department from 14 to 15 public safety officers.
In December 2009, the Carmel City Council authorized the Carmel Police Department to
participate in the Monterey Peninsula Special Response Unit (SRU), and in December of
2012 authorized the department to participate in the Peninsula Regional Violent and Narcotics
Team (PRVNT). The Police Department currently has two officers who participate as needed
on the Peninsula Special Response Unit (SRU) and one officer assigned to the Peninsula
Regional Violent and Narcotics Team (PRVNT). Each team has made a significant impact on
Page 172
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 8
the Peninsula and in our community. In 2012, The Carmel Police Department agreed to
provide one Police Officer on a half-time, as needed basis, to work with the PRVNT Task
Force in conducting its operations and investigations of narcotic and violent crimes on the
Peninsula. Last year, PRVNT requested all participating agencies assign an officer on a full
time commitment to the team. This year the Carmel Police Department has committed one
officer to full time status with the team; however, the officer is still being used to cover shifts
as needed.
Due to our current staffing levels and participation in SRU and PRVNT, adding an additional
police officer will allow our department to dedicate an officer to the beach and park patrol
position while maintaining continuity of essential patrol functions throughout the rest of the
community. This will also allow us to continue our commitment of one full time officer to
PRVNT.
The essential duties and responsibilities of the Beach/Parks officer will include the duties of
the police officer position as stated in the job description but also includes enforcing all laws
and regulations enacted by local, state and federal governments on the beach and in our
parks. This will include working with staff to ensure permits regarding special events are being
followed while conducted on the beach. This position will be 40 hours, five days a week,
including weekends, from 3pm to 11pm Wednesday through Sunday. The Beach/Parks
officer will also attend Forest and Beach Commission meetings to report on beach/park
activity and community meetings as requested. During the winter season, or at times when
the beach has minimal activity, the Beach/Parks officer will be assigned to the downtown
commercial district. The Beach/Parks officer will wear a special uniform designed for beach
use. The job description for the Beach/Parks officer assignment is Attachment 1.
The benefit of this position will save the City in some circumstances from having to call in an
officer on overtime to cover a shift when a prisoner is being transported to County Jail and the
Beach/Parks officer is on duty.
Also, by adding the Beach/Parks officer assignment, the City will no longer need the services
of First Alarm Security patrol for monitoring beach fires and other regulations on the beach. In
FY2014/15 the budget included $40,000 for the beach security patrol for three days a week
and those funds can be redirected to the Beach/Parks officer assignment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Beach/Parks officer base salary is budgeted at step one Range 273: $5,842.00 per
month. The FY 2015/16 estimate for salary and benefits was calculated at $106,533.00.
Also $40,000 of costs for this position will be offset by the money allocated in the budget for
First Alarm Security beach patrol.
Budgeted (yes/no)

Page 173
Funding Source( general fund, grant,

state)
Agenda Item: 8.C
Page 9
No
Public Safety #74010- Salaries
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION/DECISION HISTORY:

.

Page 174
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 10
CARMEL BEACH/ PARK PATROL OFFICER:

DEFINITION:
Under general supervision, performs a variety of duties involved in the enforcement of laws and
the prevention of crimes; conducts and participates in general investigations of crimes, accidents,
and cases; control traffic flow and enforces State and local traffic regulations; and performs a
variety of technical and administrative tasks in support of the Police Department.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Must be a sworn police officer working for the Carmel Police Department who is off probation
and has at minimum a Meets Expectations on the last yearly evaluation.
High School diploma or GED; at least 21 years old at time of appointment; must be a U.S.
citizen or have applied for citizenship before application; possession of a valid California
Drivers License; vision of 20/100 corrected to 20/30 in each eye and normal color acuity;
possession of a current California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training
(P.O.S.T.) Academy certificate or a current P.O.S.T. Basic Law Enforcement certificate.
DUTIES
The primary work assignment for the Beach & Park Patrol Officer will be Carmel Beach and
Mission Trails Park as well as other City parks and recreation areas and roadways surrounding
these areas. The objective of this position is to gain voluntary compliance by being visible and
by dealing with the public in a positive, effective and courteous manner. The duties will entail
the enforcement of local ordinances, state and federal laws. In addition to regular police officer
responsibilities the Beach & Park Patrol officer will:
Primarily patrol beach and parks, providing education and enforcement of specific regulations
and ordinances. Such activities may include; littering, possessing alcoholic beverages in public,
parking problems, retrieving lost items, finding their car, dogs on the beach, waste clean-up,
camping on the beach, dunes encroachment, beach fires, traversing the coastal pathways, and
other municipal ordinances.
In addition to the above duties The Beach & Park Patrol Officer will be required to:
Performs routine patrols of the beach and parks. Assist regular patrol officers if needed on
an emergency situation within the city limits;
Supervise visitor activities at City parks, facilities and beaches to reduce vandalism and
damage to City property;
Demonstrate knowledge and the ability to safely operate an All-Terrain Vehicle or four
wheel vehicle on the beach;
Promote compliance through education while on patrol and in the field; inform beach and
park patrons of City policies, procedures, and ordinances;
Provide information and assistance to the public regarding City services, programs, and
special activities;
Ensure visitors abide by conditions within issued Special Event Permits and on-going
permits;

Page 175
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 11
Assist with Event Planning staff in regards to special events planned in this area and be
present to assure all city ordinances and terms of contract are upheld;
Perform related duties as assigned.
DESIRABLE SKILLS
Considerable knowledge of first aid and CPR techniques.
Considerable knowledge of the ocean/beach and its environment.
Considerable knowledge of municipal codes and coastal regulatory rules to properly advise the
public and to enforce these rules.
Working knowledge of routine maintenance of all beach patrol vehicles and equipment, police
equipment and vehicles, radio procedures,
Ability to exercise sound judgment and initiate rescue procedures in emergency situations
Ability to recognize hazards and to exercise safety precautions to prevent injury to employees
and others.
Ability to maintain effective working relationships with employees and members of the public.
Remain calm in emergency situations.
Work independently in the absence of supervision.
Communicate clearly and concisely, both verbally and in writing.
Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of
work.
Beach patrol officers drive 4-wheel drive patrol vehicles that enable them to perform their duties
on the soft sand. In addition, officers patrol on 4-wheel ATVs during times of high tide and when
the beach is congested with swimmers and sunbathers. In addition to being sworn police officers
familiar with the standards and practices of the Carmel Police Department, the Beach & Park
Patrol Officer will receive additional specialized training in CPR-PR, water rescue operation
procedures for first responders, and first aid.
UNIFORM & HOURS
Must be willing to work weekends and possibly a modified work schedule. Employees in this
position must be available to work varying hours on weekdays, weekends and holidays during
the period of mid-June through early September. Incumbents work approximately 40 hours per
week (eight to ten hour shifts).
For uniformity and ease of recognition, the Beach & Park Patrol Officer will wear a beach
uniform per the Carmel Police Department uniform policy guidelines while on duty only with a
protective ballistic vest and Sam Browne with department issued firearm.
PATROL/RESCUE EQUIPMENT
All Carmel Police Department four wheel police cruisers
A police bicycle
Off-Road quad
SERVICE AREA

Page 176
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 12
The Beach & Park Patrol Officer provides land services to the beaches, roadways, and parks
within the city limits of the City of Carmel-By-The-Sea.

Page 177
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 13
Carmel-by-the-Sea
Personnel Calculation
Police Department
Range
273
Title
Police Officer
F Y 14-15
Current Monthly Salary
POA FY14-15 increase (eff. Jan 1, 2015)
New Monthly Salary
Number of Months paid in FY14-15
Total Salary Expense for FY14-15
Holiday in Lieu
Uniform
Medicare
PERS
Deferred Comp
Medical
F Y 15-16
Base Monthly Salary from FY14-15
POA FY15-16 increase
New Monthly Salary
Number of Months paid in FY15-16
Total Salary Expense for FY15-16
Holiday in Lieu
Uniform
Medicare
PERS
Deferred Comp
Medical

Page 178
Step
1
Current
Monthly
Salary
$ 5,672.00
$
$
$
$ 33.70 $
$
$
27.849% $
$
$ 555.80 $
$
$
$
$
$ 33.70 $
$
$
28.349% $
$
$ 555.80 $
$
5,672.00
3%
5,842.16
2
11,684.32
404.46
150.00
177.46
3,253.97
50.00
1,111.60
16,831.81
5,842.16
3%
6,017.42
12
72,209.10
4,853.49
900.00
1,130.46
20,470.56
300.00
6,669.60
106,533.20
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 14

Page 179
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 15
rorest ana ljeacn LommiSSion u ecemoer .u , LUl4 UKAr 1 minutes
3.
Receive and discuss beach fire management recommendations from the ad hoc Beach
Fires Committee and provide recommendations to the Planning Commission.
Comm issioner Bang presented the beach fire management recommendations of the ad hoc
beach fire committee:
1. 26 wood burning fire pits of an appropriate size to be placed on the beach- 2 at each
stairway and 4 in each cove .
2. Only burn dry seasoned f irewood- no driftwood, pallets, or other materials.
3. City owned and placed and anchored by the City.
4. Cleaned daily.
5. First come - first served . No permits at this t ime.
6. Allow unlimited user supplied propane fires year round south of lOth Ave .
7. Fire pits will be provided seasonally and removed in winter based on beach conditions.
8. City to provide enhanced secu rity patrols 5 days a week untilll:OO p.m.
9. For pilot program a variety of fire pits will be tried. After pilot program a Carmel design
should be developed.
10. For summer holiday weekends the City will provide 25 additional portable fire baskets
per day. These w ill be left on the beach for pickup the following day by the City.
11. Develop a public education program on the new fire rules and procedures.
12. Monitor the program and recommend changes as issues arise.
Comm issioner Ferlito asked about allowing charcoal in addition to seasoned wood .
Commissioner Bang thought that should be allowed.
Commissioner Baron asked about th e proposed placement of the fire pits and expressed
concern that some homes may get more smoke than others. Perhaps an even spacing would
even out the smoke exposure to the homes.
Forester Branson exp lained how the fire pit placement was developed.
Commissioner Bang pointed out that the placement is where most people seem to want their
fires and adjustments can be made as the program is implemented.
Commissioner Carter pointed out that Memorial Day would be a good first test and some things
could be reassessed after the holiday weekend .
Public comment opened at 4:29 p.m.
Greg D'Ambrosio thought that if t he City goes forward with the program, all of the
recommendations need to be implemented in order t o provide a true picture of the program' s
success or deficiencies. This is a long term problem and he is opposed to wood fires and
thought that 11fires in a canu should only be allowed. He noted that the City once purchased and
provided low-flush toilets to residents and hotels. Perhaps the City could do the same thing
with portable propane fires. This would eliminate most of the beach f ire issues as well as the
costs that w ill be incurred to manage the fire program.
Page 3 of 6
Page 180
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 16
t-orest ana tseacn Lomm1ss1on uecemoer 11, LU14 UKAt-1 mmures
Commissioner Bang noted that the winter season should give a good representation of how
propane fires will work on the beach .
Skip Lloyd appreciated the work ofthe ad hoc committee and the Commission on the fire
issues. He expressed disapproval of the installation of permanent fire pits and thinks they will
be ugly. He also does not like dedicating the cove areas for fire as this will preclude the non-fire
use of the coves. He agrees that sign age and enforcement need to be in place for the program
to succeed. He is in favor of having the fire baskets available with cleanup the next day.
Scott McKenzie thought that oil burning tiki torches, pig roasts, and generators should not be
allowed on the beach. He pointed out that smoke cannot be fair to everyone. He thought that
26 fire pits would result in some people being turned away from the beach. Enforcement of the
wood requirement, not to burn trash, and people holding places will be difficult. He pointed out
that his proposal will solve most of the fire issues. He asked if catered food is allowed, why not
catered fires?
Public comment closed at 4:42p.m.
Commissioner Baron thanked the committee for their work. He thought that fire pits will be
dirty and there may be fights over them, but the City needs to do something. He noted that
that the City needs to be committed to regular cleaning of the fire pits. He would like to also
allow free, permitted portable charcoal fires allowed on the beach. Permits would be issued at
the police Department along with the rule on fires and charcoal disposal. Perhaps they could
also be allowed in winter. He understands that this idea may not work, but as a trial, as part of
the pilot program it should be considered.
Commissioner Bang asked for clarification of commissioner Baron's proposal.
Commissioner Baron clarified his request.
Commissioner Ferlito thought that adding additional items to the original proposal may dilute
the effectiveness of evaluating the program.
Commissioner FERLITO moved to adopt the recommendations of the ad hoc committee with
the addition of allowing charcoal in the fire pits and a strong recommendation for an enhanced
staff patrol of the beach; seconded by Commissioner CARTER.
Chair Refuerzo asked if charcoal grills were being banned. Forester Branson noted that portable
charcoal grills are considered f ires.
Commissioner Baron wanted the issue of portable charcoal grills should be discussed now as to
whether to allow them or not. He did not think that allowing charcoal grills would affect the
original proposal and the City needs to try allowing them to see if it works or not.
Commissioner Bang pointed out that this is the f irst time she recalls discussing charcoal grills.
She noted that a limited number allowed by permit could be allowed, but an unlimited number
is not a good idea.
Page4of6
Page 181
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 17
t-oresr ana l:jeacn Lomm1ss1on uecemoer 11, LU14 UKAt-1 mmures
Comm issioner Baron pointed out that permits that would be issued by the police Department
would include all ofthe fire rules . He thinks that five per day is a reasonable number to try.
Commissioner Ferlito expressed concern that the charcoal grill proposal complicated the issues
and a pilot program should have a clear message - fires in fire pits only.
Commissioner Baron pointed out that people may dump their charcoal in the trash or on the
beach, but we won't know unless we give the idea a try.
Commissioner Bang thought that the original proposals should be implemented and the issue of
charcoal grills can be considered later.
Commissioner Ferlito expressed her concern that charcoal will be dumped on the sand and the
checking of permits will be additional work for the security patrols.
Chair Refuerzo asked Commissioner Ferlito if she was willing to amend her motion to allow a
limited number of permitted charcoal grills.
Commissioner Ferlito declined to amend her motion.
Chair REFUERZO presented a substitute motion to adopt the recommendations of the ad hoc
committee, allow charcoal use in the fire pits, a strong recommendation for an enhanced staff
patrol of the beach, and allow 5 free, permitted portable contained charcoal cooking fires per
day with fire rules provided at the issuance of the permit by the Police Department. Seconded
by BARON
The motion carried by the following vote :
AYES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
Carter, Baron, Refuerzo

Ferlito, Bang
None
None
REPORTS FROM STAFF AND COMMISSIONERS

10.
Forester's report
Page 5 of 6

Page 182
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 18
January 28, 2015
Mayor Burnett, Vice Mayor Beach, and Councilmembers Dallas, Talmage, and
Theis:
I'd like to provide some background on the inclusion of the "5 permitted charcoal
fires, by police station permit, in user supplied devices" feature that the Forest
and Beach Commission approved in our proposal for the beach fire management
pilot program .
This aspect of the Forest and Beach Commission's proposal offers a number of
immediate benefits to the public, at minimal risk and cost:
It provides coastal recreational access to fires, albeit small ones of a

different variety, during the winter months when the fire rings are
unavailable.
As the smoke from charcoal fires is significantly less than that from wood
fires, the five permitted fires would provide a less harmful way to increase
the recreational capacity of the beach in addition to the first come, first
served fire rings.
It will provide the city with a small toe hold in the business of issuing
permits- if it should come to that. If the rings prove to be problematic
over the next year, the issuance and management of a limited number of
permits now will provide the city with some knowledge of another
possibility. This is insurance at a minimal cost.
As a member of the majority of the Forest and Beach Commission that approved
the proposal for the pilot program, I believe that the purpose of the pilot
program should not necessarily be to find the best solution now, but rather, to
put the city in a position to try to find the best solution next year.
Now is the perfect time for the city to experiment with different ideas in the
hopes of gaining fire management knowledge. Allowing the limited, permitted
use of charcoal devices will allow the city to address the following questions with
knowledge, rather than speculation, a year from now:

Page 183
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 19
Will these devices be dirtier than the fire rings? Will people dump charcoal
on the beach? Maybe, but the charcoal in a small hibachi combusts
completely during dinner, and by the time that dinner is complete, the
apparatus is cool enough for the car and the garbage can at home, ashes
and al l. We shouldn't be afraid to experiment based on an assumption that
people will misbehave. A better path is available- watching the public and
learning from their behavior.
Will the permits cause confusion? Perhaps, but easy signage (({Fires in rings
or by police station permit only") is possible, and the physical permit from
the police station would have the rules and regulations printed right on itbus your charcoal, stay away from the slopes, etc.
Will people make the trek to the police station to get the permits to secure
the experience? Will t hey then follow the rules? Maybe. I know that as a
resident that enjoys the beach, I'd make the trek myself. Perhaps others
would as well. And if no one makes the effort, that also will be an
important piece of data.
I believe that these and other questions, and the resultant answers, will provide
important information for the city council to consider in 2016 on the path to a
final plan to contain the smoke and sand issues related to beach fires.
I hope that you'll agree that this pilot program is just that- a pi lot program, a
learning experience on the way to a f inal set of rules. We have an excellent
opportunity here to do and learn, rather than guess and react.
With all respect,
~~
Jeff Baron
Forest and Beach Commissioner

Page 184
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 20
Documents 4, 5, 6 and 7
Can be found by accessing online at www.ci.carmel.ca.us or you may view
documents with the City Clerk at Eastside of Monte Verde Street between Ocean
and Seventh Avenues, Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Page 185
Agenda Item: 8.C

Page 21
Presentations from December 4, 2014 Forest and Beach Commission Workshop
...
0
N
~
(])
L.
..0
E
Q)
(.)
(])
0
Q)
en
s;...
l.i.
..c
C)
m
Q)
...
c.
0
en
..c
~
L.
(.)
-c
:J .
0>
~
tJ
(0
a:J
en
Q)
-~
...0
<D
..0
a3
:J
---~
..-.
~
0.
~
-c
....-
c
;:J
E.
(/l
-co
c:
-~
a
0..
~
.fl.
(I)
(J
Ba:ckground
'
-. Community concerns of deterioration of sand and air quality fr9ni

. beach fires brought to Forest and .Beach
Commission
.
,,
'
....
Research on other jurisdictions' approaches ~o. managing beach fires

-Carmel is the last pubHc beach itt California that allows unlimited fires
and that allows fires directly on the sand
~:
"
In July, City Council adopted guiding principles:

- No fires directly on sand
- Limit on the number of fires
>
r
Wo'rkshop intended to obtain input on proposal for

imple.tnentation'
tr:'
.o
. ~ ;~1~i: i~ij\~ 1 t~y:~~. !;,\.J.,
o:o
.
\...~. .. I ;-.' 1 )1:1. 1~ 1 \.!A._ Ir. 1. ,.
_ .~. ~n- =~e
\J , -~1(\fs
. 1 ~ 1 : I
.:
Air Quality
~
1.1
,.
:-t1
,.
o;
,::;:
~.
~~
-~
..~
;"~
Glass and other trash left on beach and path

.
Safety issues. related to fires left burning on beach or.put out with sand
leaving hot coals buried
nGraffifi destroying sandstone., revetments torn ap_
art.to make fire pits
'B'l.Jrning of toxic substances
. , Debris w~sheq into the bay, comes back in storms
Banks eroded by people dragging fire materials
Reputation of beach as "pristine, white sand" at risk
& ..
f .
....
,.
....
,
\
~
..
..
..,
.
..
Q)
"'0
::J
c
..0
-enro
0
(.)
....,
0
.c
C)
->
ro
Q)
"'0
c
ro
en
::J
.c
....,
-~
....,
0
....,
::J
c..
C)
c
c
::J
t-
..0
Q)
4=
en
~
....
'+=
en
Q)
::J
en
-en
~
....,
ro
Q)
'+-
(/)
L!)
'l
.:
J '.
.,
.'
'
' .') J
... ...
.,
....,_
''
~ ... ..
--~...
Q)
co
E
0
.........
t:
co
c..
co
c
0
'-
.........
~
Q)
E
Q)
.........
>
.
C/)
-co
<L>
co
E
<L>
s'+--
0>
c
-
co
0>
0>
s-
-o
<L>
-c..
<L>
c..
>.
..a
-o
<L>
-o
<L>
sC/)
co
1'-
~I
t
\
~ .
,
'
i
t:.
CJ)
L..
CJ)
+-'
c
-
rn
(.)
..0
CJ)
Q)
E
0
(.)
'"C
c
rn
~
rn
..0
+-'
CJ)
c
Q)
CJ)
..c
rn
CJ)
..c
Q)
0
co
~----------~~----------~~~~
- ~-
-----;
--
i _
. ..
( .;.1
Carmel is one of very few

white sand beaches in
Ca. Made up of sand
formed from wave action
off of native granite.
Charcoal is graying sand.
9
,i
....
',
'
. ._...,.
..
I
..r' ..
" "'-'
.. ..
\
....
.~
1!'
L..
.
en
ro
"'C
c
ro
en
(1)
~
..c
?:
(1)
c
en
L..
L..
--c.
~
(.)
..c
ro
(1)
..c
0
c
~
(1)
ro
::J
c.
0::
v '.
..
I' .,', (',

\
. . ..
en
Q)
(.)
co
....,
en
..c
:::J
en
(.)
><
0
....,
0
C)
L..
c
c
:::J
al
'I'""
r-
.;
'
,.
'.
." ...
,
l
." -
I(
..
~
.'.
I
..
. ...
Jl
\ ,
\'
. .....
'
.,
'"
..
I\
.~~
-..
.t'If
...
\
'
-';.
..
f "' ( '
'...
..
\.
""'
.
,:
. ..~...,...tt..'
.,....,. "' "..-~~ . ..

... ,
.'.
I I.
. ;.. i
.
.,
,..
.'
..
.,,. '
u:
-i~
- . ... ..:.' J- .:. .
..
.
'
,.'
,_'.
"'0
c
co
en
Q)
.c
+-'
0
E
L-
'+-
en
0>
Q)
-c
c
L-
::J
.0
-c
c
co
co
(.)
co
L-
(.)
..c
Q)
co
+-'
c
E
-w
(.)
..c
ro
(])
.c
~
..0
(])
E
C/)
"'C
0
0
~
0
'+-
+-'
::J
E
ro
(])
..c
+-'
(])
(.)
(])
::J
"'C
0:::
T'""
('I')
~"~~~ -~,
....
~~
,-
-.ObJ'ecttVesiJ;;)rjir'iciples
Objectives:
.JI
1 <..1
.,
.,
'
E-liminate charcoal and burned logs from the sand

Reduce the amount of wood smoke to residents affected by beach
fires
.......
_,
Principles: ~;.::_:
Limit the number of fires on .the sand

.
.,
:t
No fires directly on sand
. Purpos-e:
~
'
_:
~ ,Find middl.~ approach toaddress objectives whUe allowing tradition
of beach fire.s ~. -~ Na status quo. No ban fires .

.
~~
15
Re~se~a,:rch - , ca"lf"ito!rn;i~a.c 'Bie. a.c.:h :~ "- F~i ~re
R.ules
435 Beaches in California, .38 allow fires

The state recently removed 7 beache.s from allowing fires
Nati.ParkServioe, Ocean Beach pilot begun this summ.~r to address toxic materials,
broken glass, metal, hot coals and nails, fires not being extinguished properly;
unauthorized fires-pilqt inst~lls 12 fire rings (only place for fires), fires must be out by
9PM, no fi res on Spare the Air days.
NewportBeach-starting this summer, only lump charcoal may be burned in the fire pits,
purpose is to address same issues as above while still providing warmth and cooking
No public beach in Carifornia allows fires directly on the s~nd
No public beach:in California allows,. an unlimited numberof fires
Some beaches require permits
Some perrnit fires only in summer months
16
Cn.rn rilunity Input
Carmel Resident Association (CRA)

~
sustainable Carmel
Friends of the Forest

..
: ... ... ;..

-
.SAND
Carmei Innkeepers Board
Chamber of Commerce Board.
~.,
c armel Po.lice Chief

Citizens, Council Members
Coastal Commission
.17
Coastai Commission Staff Input

Overall objective: affordable access for all users of the beach
Current land use plan allows for limiting number of fires and for taking fires off
sand
Use. of permits would require CC approval
Use of motorized rakes would require CC approval for each use- concern is
for harm to kelp and intru~ion into visitors space, also does not pick up fine ash
Charging for setting up fires, would require CC approval
Recognize need to reduce number in winter
Some concern expressed for current number of large events which limit access
to both beach and parking
18
PropOsal;. One Ye:arPilot to AChieve

Guid i'rlQ. :PrhJ:cip:l~s
~
..
rc_:-Jo
""
'
...
, No. change, in fire aUowed locations

26 Contain merit devices: 2 .at eactn>~taircase (1Oth _to Martin
Way) and 4 in each cove,- suppHed by city, cleaned by city
Add.ltlon91 porfable~ propane fire pits allowed, supplied
ihdividuals, pack it in, pack it aut .
tJse of.off-the..:shelf product during one
by
year pilot period
: No permits:' firsf~c:ome, first served during piiQt

Conta.inment device rerrtovea in winter, propane-only 'ffres during
those months
.
'
.:- Continuation;of current security an'd police support

19
en
....f-J
a.
(])
s.....
'+-o
0
0
~
'+-
-(])
..c
en
(])
....f-J
..c
~
0
en
(])
-a.
E
ro
><
w
0
N
en
+-'
c..
(I)
'"'-
CD
ro
c..
0
'c..
(I)
..0
ro
t
0
Cl.
-~
(I)
..c
enI
(J)
+-'
..c
~
0
en
(I)
-Cl..
E
ro
><
C.lea,hei.~sand
ir
.
' olear.tet~:a'
- -. -
.
.
.~-
...
''
,,
--
...,..
--~----,-~---~--.,...
-~__,.,,_.._,..
Next SJte:ps
Forest and Beach review and recommendation
'
J
.- Pla: ntlin~f~Commilssion review and recomm.endation

~_.
'
'
--
.!.
.. J
..
'='
Cjty-' C.oUrl~JI Re~iew a~cf approval

~ _l~
n"
t'!' ,.
..
'1
'
'>.'!
...
1.-
'
.oastal Commission review and

..
"
apprgv.~i'l:,.. jf
I
"!'
-. rf1,
'
"'
:l
'1~'
required
'
.,
~ -.Signage and pgbllc educatiOn ~o be developed

~
.. J
-~
Cl
---
'
lmpl.e~ent9tion of .pilot:..IYiay,. 201.5:to; May., '2016

.:
llj
u,
..
Evaluation and a,djustments

23
D;isc,ussiO.n
-Location
- Number of fires
- Type of fuel
-:Ring examples
-Permits I User fee
- Recovery for cleaning
- l=valuation criteria
24
What is the Monterey Bay Unified Air

Pollution Control District?
A government agency responsible for air monitoring,
permitting, enforcement, long-range air quality
planning, regulatory development, education and
public information activities related to air pollution.
The Mission of the Monterey Bay Unified Air

Pollution Control District is to Protect the Public
Health and Environmental Health while balancing
Economic and Air Quality Considerations.
tn
(I)
(.)
1..
::l
en
c:::
cfiJ
UJ
-0
.!
E
w
.!!
.c
:e
Air Quality in the Carmel Area
Particulate Matter (smol<e and dust)

Smoke Sensitive Areas
Spare the Air
Ozone
U)
c:
-.....0
ca
_.0
'-
-.....c:
0
~
'<t
m
CJ)
I-
>..
Q)
.!!o
0
:2
~
.j..l
.....0
0
~
>...
QJ
,.......;"
,.......;"
QJ
,.......;"
s
rd
'te
urrent Air Quality
,-- -- -1
----
------ ----- ---- - --- - -- --- ------- --- - - --------
MONTEREY BAY
----------
Unified Air Pollution Control District

srrl'irr<J .~Jou tcrt.'IJ, Sfm
IJ,.,,;,,J, and Souto Cru:t. CounliC's
--------
- - -- - -
--
--
----- .. -
Current
Ben Lomon d- Good- 23 AQI - P!v12.5- 9AIv'

Boulder C reek - Good - 13 AQI - Pf'v12.5 - 9 A fv'
Carmel V a lle y AfAS - Good - 4 AQI - Ozo ne - 8Arvi
felto n Cal-Fire- N / A
Hollist er
At~t\S
- Good - 12 AQI - Ozone - 8AI'IA
King C it y A l-.AS - Good - 14 AQI - Ozone - 8Af-A

SLV /".;,iddle Sch ool- Good- 0 AQI- PM 2 .5- 9ArV\
Salin as A rv\S - Good - 4 AQI - Pfv,2.5 - 9 Afv\
Santa C ruz A liAS - Good - 14 AQI - Ozone - 8Afv\
Air Quality Forecast

( Foreca~+
,Lr__ -~er;Pit.'
,l
- --:___ _ _L_- - - - - - -
---
I Carmel Va lley
I
~ea__~~------~
- - - - - -- -
- - - -- --
----- - - -
- -----~ I
Tomorrow
1
I
' I
---
Dav enport
! Hollister . - -
1
' 1I _ _ __
! King City
I [~;'arina/S~;ide
!
f.;, onterey Peninsula

Pinnacles Nat ion a l lv,onum enf
Salinas
San Lorenzo Valley
Santa Cruz
11
Scotts Va11ey
Watsonvm: _
__ _ _ ______
--~------------
- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ____
ood smoke is natural - how can
urt you?
Or, since wood is mainly just carbon, hydrogen, and

oxygen, doesn't it just change to C02 and H2 0 when it is
combined with oxygen (burned)?
Reason: the combustion efficiency is far less than 100/o
CD
E
U)
What's in Smoke?
Smoke particles: small, less than one micron in
diameter; behave like a gas
Penetrate indoors and deep into the lung
Have high surface area: adsorb other combustion
products, catalytic surface
Gaseous pollutants: CO, NOx, SOx, irritant gases
(i.e., aldehydes)
moke Particles
Smoke particles are a complex mixture of extremely small
particles and liquid droplets, including:
acids (such as nitrates and sulfates),
organic chemicals,
metals,
c. PM2.:5
HUMAN HAJR
~ ~
soil, and
50-70JLm
dust particles.
Many of these particles
" Ptd10
Oust
meld. etc.
<10
can cause cancer, other
chronic, and acutely
toxic effects.
~~1'1id0$. orpnie
oompot!Mt,
~ in~
<2.5 J1m~ln 4~
pcn'en,
~m (mborio:;) 1n ~
eo.-m ~ln~
f'fNE 8EACH SAND
..... ~ ~,...C1$f.~
oxic Pollutants in Smo

Small particles, CO, N0 2
Hydrocarbons
25+ saturated hydrocarbons such as n-hexane
40+ unsaturated hydrocarbons such as 1,3 butadiene
28+ mono-aromatics such as benzene & styrene
20+ polycyclic aromatics such as benzo(a)pyrene
Oxygenated organics
20+ aldehydes including formaldehyde & acrolein
25+ alcohols and acids such as methanol
33+ phenols such as catechol & cresol
Many quinones such as hydroquinone
Naeher et al.
Semi-quinone-type and other radicals
2007, ill
Chlorinated organics such as methylene chloride and dioxin
Health Effects
Inhalation of
particulate matter
Autonomic
dysregulation
Pulmonary inflammation
Systemic inflammation
Hypercoagulability
t Platelet activation
i Atherosclerosis
t Cardiac frequency
t Arterial pressure
J. Heart rate variability
Arrhythmias
Acute myocardial infarction
Venous thromboembolism
Direct translocation
into blood
olein (an aldehyae

t
Short term symptoms include

stinging and tearing eyes,
nausea and vomiting.
Long term exposure risk is:

Chronic respiratory disease
1\
't
I
'v
maldehyde
Short term symptoms
include irritated eyes,
nose and throat.
Inflammation of mucous
membranes
Long term exposure risk
is nasal and
nasopharyngeal cancer.
~
I
nzene
Short term symptoms are
headaches, dizziness, nausea
and breathing difficulties
respiratory , eye irritation
Long term exposure risks are
an~unl , liver and kidney
damage, and cancer,
especially leukemia, changes
In blooa cell ratios.
Mon
Prevents hemoglobin from carrying
oxygen
Symptoms include headache,
dizziness, nausea, decreased
alertness, impaired mental
function.
High concentrations cause
death from effect on brain and
heart.
Slowly released from
hemoglobin
,,
I \
i '
' ~
I
I
I
',
.,
~-
)
J
Cardiovascular Disease
Diabetes
Cancer
Porphyria
Endometriosis
Decreased Testosterone
Chloracne
Biochemical
Developmental
Thyroid Status
Immune Status
Neurobehavior
Cognition
Dentition
Reproductive Effects
Altered Sex Ratio
"L.,.
00
M
~
QJ
VI
;::,
ClJ
0:::
~
Q)
--
-Q)
~
E
ro
()
..........__
-ro::J
ro
Q)
<(
en
c
en Q)
c >
.........,
c Q)
(l_
~Q)
Q)
Q)(f)
~
2~
c
o
(f)
,-
r"'
.; .
. ' ,...
,,...
.rI:I
Home Heating Devices

Relative
Emissions
of Fine
Particles
[mJ
Woodburnlng
Fireplace
~
pscleanair.org
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
Uncertified
W oodstov<>
EPA
Certified
Wood stove
Pellet
Stove
Oil
Furnace
iTliMI1iat'-..
Highest
annual
pollution
2 44 1bs. of
a nnual
pollution
97 lbs. of
annual
pollution
Gas
Furnace
E l ect ric
H eat
or Stove
VERY CLEAN
271bs. of
< 1/4 lb of
annual
annual
pollution
pollution
< 1/6 l b of
a nnua l
pollut ion
ZERO
annual
pollu tion
Ways to Reduce Smoke

Choose not to burn when air quality is already poor.
Start fires with softwood kindling such as pine or fir.
Always burn "seasoned" or dry wood. These woods are generally
low in density, ignite easily, burn fast and hot. Hardwoods such as oak
can take longer to ignite, but they burn slower and produce less
smoke. Remember to use smaller fires in mild weather.
Never burn garbage and other materials. It can cause toxic smoke
that can be extremely harmful to you and your neighbors.
Watch for smoke. Properly burning fires should give off only a wisp of
white steam. The darker and thicker the smoke, the more pollution the
fire emits, and the more fuel it wastes.
Extinguish fires completely when done. Smoldering fires emit
large amounts of smoke.
Remember ... If you can smell smoke, you are breathing smoke!
Questions I Comments?
Contact Inform.ation
Richard Stedman, Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO)
(831) 647-9411
24580 Silver Cloud Court
Monterey, CA 93940
rstedman@mbuapcd.org
www.mbuapcd.org
Public comment for December 4, 2014 Forest and Beach Commission Workshop
Sharon Friedrichsen
Susan f o x Wednesday, November 19, 2014 1:06PM
Doug Schmitz; Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Beach Fire Meeting
My name is Susan Fox and I reside at
II
l eon Carmel Point. I would like to voice my support
for a resolution of the beach fire situation, I do support the ability to have beach fires, but I would agree that
they need to be limited In numbers. Carmel beach fires have become very popular in the Summer months and
the smoke from the fires travels up to homes on Carmel Point and greatly effects the air quality. Also the
debris left by the fires has definitely left its mark In the sand, so I would support fire pits that can be
cleaned, Also, I am unclear why the fires are only at our end of the beach and not allowed to be spread out
farther North to help dissipate the smoke and debris so It's not so concentrated at the South end.
1 appreciate your efforts to help the community find a happy median that Is both considerate of the
environment and allows people to enjoy the fires.
Thank you for your time.
I
PENINSULA
re11l estate group
Susan Fox
Peninsula Real Estate Group, Inc.
Residential and Commercial Real Estate Sales and Development
CalBRE #00779199
- --
18 November 2013
Sharon Friedrichsen
City of Carmel
BoxCC
Cannel, CA 93921
RECBVEO NOV 2 0 201~
Dear Sharon:
As a Carmel resident since 19491 have seen many changes- some good, some bad, some
necessary, some maybe not necessary. I would like to be on record as believing the proposed
recommendations of the beach committee are very necessary. With the rise in population and
the improved accessibility of the area we must adapt. I love walking the beach at night and
seeing a few fires scattered down the beach and I have roasted my share of hot dogs.
However we've outgrown the space available. I walk my dog on the beach every morning and
it's disheartening to see the masses of trash filled fires, many still burning. Charcoal is
everywhere and the health of the marine life is being jeopardized. We are destroying the very
beauty that drew (and keeps) us here. Let's not loose the tradition completely, with some
regulation and common sense we can have our beautiful surroundings and our fun.
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
sent:
To:
cc:
Subject:
Robert Cotham~
Friday, Novemb~
Sharon Friedrichsen
Doug Schmitz
Beach Fire Meeting
.
My wife and I have a home in Carmel located at San Antonio,. .
'
of Ocean and have followed for some time the issue of beach fires
on Carmel beach. It is my understanding that there will be a
meeting on December 4th to discuss what might be done to control
the fires. We would love to participate in the meeting but are out of
town at this time.
Although we will not be at the meeting, we are excited that
something might be done to control the fires. I walk on the beach
regularly and see firsthand the damage caused by the charcoal
left behind. We would support any reasonable measures to control
the number of fires and the charcoal and half burned wood left
behind.
We realize that unrestricted fires have been part of our tradition;
however, since all other California beaches no longer allow this
practice, the pressure on Carmel beach has grown and is
intolerable. I would hope that we are more sensitive to our
environment than we were a hundred years ago. We should do
something now to protect our unique beautiful beach.
Robert and Mary Ann Cotham
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
fyi
,.
Doug Schmitz
Monday, November 24, 2014 7:59AM
Sharon Friedrichsen; Mike Branson
FW: Beach Fires
..
From: Hazel W e s t [ Sent: Saturday, Nov~

To: Doug Schmitz
Cc: kathleen bang
Subject: Beach Fires
Unfortunately I will not be in town to attend the meeting December 4th regarding the beach fires. However, I
have been a regular beach walker for the past two plus years and am saddened to see the damage the beach
fires are causing to the sand on Carmel Beach. There is a definite need to restrict and/or contain the fires,
ashes and leftover bbq food that is left on the beach . Obviously It Is not desirable to abolish the fires but
some containment or restrictions are sadly needed if we are to continue to have one of the most beautiful
beaches in California.
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Doug Schmitz
Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:58AM
FW: Beach Fires
fyi
Sent: Monday, Nnll<>rnn=-r

To: Doug Schmitz
SubJect: Beach Fires
Hello Doug,
We have property located on Scenic in Cannel and are planning to retire there. We enjoy walking on the beach
and the paths. However, my wife has respiratory problems and finds the smoke worsens her condition. Smoke
from fires has proven to be a public health/safety liability.
A recent article dated July 2014 from the Feinberg School of Medicine published in Voll24 Journal of Clinical
Investigations by Dr. Chiarella, etc. cites increased risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events secondary to wood
smoke exposure. At this time, residents don't have a choice about their exposure to wood smoke. Locating
fires N of Ocean would protect residents.
Has anyone considered the benefits of restricting the containment devices to North of Ocean Avenue which
would eliminate seasonal relocation of fire containers? In addition to the cost savings, there would be health
benefits by increasing the spatial separation of smoke from homes and the Scenic walking path, since the park
would serve as a buffer between the beach and San Antonio residences. Residents on Scenic would benefit by
not looking at fire rings while San Antonio residences North of Ocean don't have sand views, only blue water
views (no negative impact from fire rings they could not see.). The Scenic embankments would benefit from
reduced damage caused by people sliding logs and supplies down the sides. The goal of the fire pits is to
prevent contamination of the white sand. Currently, the residents South of 1Oth Street have had to endure the
health hazards from exposure to wood smoke. If you do not restrict the fires toN of Ocean shouldn't a more
equitable solution be to spread the fires out on the entire beach rather than concentrating them in one section?
Sincerely,
Carl Hoffinan
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Missy Jensen~
Monday, Dece~
two points on the beach fires
Dear Doug and Sharon,

I will not be in town on December 4th and would like to express a couple of points about the beach
fires . Sharon and I have had a conversation about this before. My husband and I live here full time on Santa
Lucia,41Jhouse from Scenic. During my term as President of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Garden Club, the club
replanted the Harrison Memorial Library garden and launched the Dunes project at Ocean and San Antonio. so I
have a great commitment to our City. Also, I walk my dog almost every morning on the beach.
Regarding the beach fires, here are the things I feel most strongly about:
Move the fires north towards Ocean Avenue where there is public parking, a bigger restrooms facility, room
for industrial size garbage containers, easier access for Police and required services. The southern end
neighborhoods are overrun every warm night with cars, traffic, people hauling camping and fire equipment, and
garbage. The garbage overflowed the containers all summer.
Put out the f'lres by I O:OOpm. The Police have told me that as long as the people are quiet, they do not make
them put out the fires by 1O:OOpm. After 1O:OOpm, the Police and monitors depart and people will leave their
garbage and fires on the beach. Also, I cannot open my windows on a hot night until the fires and smoke are
out and I think it quite fair to ask to be able to do this at 1O:OOpm.
Thanks for all you are doing to improve our quality of life and the quality of the air.
Best regards,
Missy Jensen
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To :
Subject:
Doug Schmitz
Monday, December 01,2014 8:14AM
FW: Carmel Beach
From: Alison L Mcdaniel

Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 1 :39 PM
To: Doug Schmitz
subject: Carmel Beach
Dear Doug,
Actually, It hit critical mass or crisis state a long time ago, but everyone dozed or tossed this hot potato back into a beach
fire, in the hopes it would wash out Lo sea and vanish. I am Ali Miner McDaniel, a 20 year resident, CRA member, (past)
avid beach cleaner, and front line complainer about the ghastly condition of our magnificent beach. I used to write to Sue
McCloud on a regular basis, I contacted the coastal commission, attended meetings, spoke with city council members,
and personally dealt with Waste Mgmt. AND the health dept. regarding the filthy and foul condition of our Scenic Rd.
waste bins ... my other cause celeb. I dug the Illegal fire pits, along with my elderly husband who passed away 2 years ago
and j ust about broke my back carrying up 3 & 4 bags FULL of charcoal and debris on beach clean-up Saturdays. Many
fellow residents took part and still do in the ongoing effort to save our beautiful beach. I have called the police MANY
times to report illegal fires . However, in spite of my efforts, little was done to prevent the befouling fires, legal and illegal,
my gripes were largely ignored and here we are, years later, and finally the city Is waking up! It had been my suggestion
all along to put metered parking at the beach, give residents permit stickers, and let this collected money pay for beach
clean-up (since absolutely no one would DARE suggest banning fires completely.) As it is and has been (from lime to
time) crews come one day a week and clean the "legal" pits .. .Thank God, but it's not enough! Never has been. I am SO
happy that finally the city IS paying attention! This is an issue that has long needed addressing and ACTION. We ARE
the custodians of this beach; it is a TREASURE, a unique diamond In the crown of mother earth. and we as citizens, local
govl, and coastal commission are responsible for its maintenance and well-being. Everything shown in the video is true
and accurate and I have seen and cleaned it all for years. I'm so glad I'm no longer a lone voice in the forest. I will be at
the meeting on the 4th. Sincerely, Ali McDaniel
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Loretta W illiams
Monday, December 01, 2014 11 :41 AM
Sharon Friedrichsen
Beach fires
As Beach Cleaners for many years, we are STUNNED at the amount of beach fire material is accumulating- practically up
to the sidewalk! There is a lot of stuff practically under the volley ball nets. I moan and groan to Helen et all every time
King and I go down to help. It seems there is nothing we can do. But it's certainly getting out of hand.
Loretta Williams
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
John Cromwell ~
Monday, Decem~
Beach fires hearing
HI Doug and Sharon,

My wife and I are not sure If we will be able to make it to the hearing this Thursday regarding the beach fires. We live on
Carmel Point atWJ5an Antonio Road, just south of 14th on the west side.
The beach fires have grown to be a major issue for us from several standpoints.
Intensity of the smoke affecting local residents:
We have noticed a measurable increase in the number of beach fires and i ntensity of the smoke in our neighborhood over the
past several years. The fact that the fires are only permitted south of 10th does not make sense to us, in that the prevailing
winds push the smoke into the Carmel Point area, directly over our house. It is as if Carmel decided It is ok to have fires, just
make sure the smoke does not come into our neighborhood. Just this September, during a spare the air weekend, when it
was a warm Saturday night, we had to close up all of our windows and doors because the smoke was just too thick. If smelled
as if we were in the middle of a forest fire . I ended up calling both the City of Carmel and the Monterey Air Quality District
offices to complain. I did hear back from the Monterey Air Quality District, but never from the City of Carmel. We frequently
end up having to close our windows because the wood smoke Is too strong.
Health concerns:
My wife and 1are both cancer survivors. We purposely did not put wood burning fireplaces in our house when we remodeled
because of the smoke. It is a known f act that burning wood fires generate considerable amounts of carcinogenic
chemicals. Much worse than cigarette smoke. Why we allow the burning of these open fires given the health and air quality
concerns makes no sense.
Beach appearance and safety:
We walk the beach nearly every morning. It Is not uncommon to find smoldering fires early in the morning. While I have not
stepped on any hot embers, I have tripped over half buried firewood. Aside from the risk to children and others from still
burni ng fires, the biggest issue is that the beach is clearly becoming gray in many areas south of 10th, particularly as you get
closer to the embankments. It is unsightly, with immeasurable chunks of charred wood fragments and ash discoloring the
sand. The city seems to count on big waves to clean up the mess but that does not seem to be a reliable fix. And what does
that mean for what we are contributing to the health of the ocean.
Conclusion:
We would prefer that there not be any fires . If there must be fires (and I see no reason how anyone could argue that we must
have fires) then spread them across the entire beach so they are not concentrated near the Point and funneling the smoke
and the crowds into the southern end of Carmel. limit the absolute number of fires by requiring permits for all fires. And use
the permit fees to pay for the cleaning of the beach, not just the fire pits, but ail the trash and waste left behind by the beach
fire crowds. Finally, what ever is ultimately decided upon, it must be patrolled. And there should be a simple means to report
infractions when they are happening, rather than having to wait till Monday morning to complain to the City.
We greatly appreciate your efforts in helping find a solution to this problem.
Kind regards,
1
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mary Liskin
Monday,
01, 2014 7:47 PM
Sharon Friedrichsen
The future of Beach Fires
>Dear Ms. Friedrichsen and Mr. Schmitz,
>
>Please accept my letter regarding this issue since I will not be able
>to attend the Dec. 4th meeting. I appreciate the chance to state my opinion.
>
> 1. First, there is no asset more valuable than our WHITE SAND beach.
>
> 2. Mother Nature appears no longer able to "wash away" all that humans are dumping on her beach in the form of
charcoal and
> debris.
>
> 3. Even with the best intent, once that charcoal mixes with the sand, there is no way to pick it up. Add to that
darkness
> and possible Inebriation of attendees, it ends up that dawn reveals the mess left behind for citizens to take up
garbage on their
> morning walk. 1 can attest that it takes away from what is supposed to be an enjoyable visit.
>
> 4. Improved signage only helps in citations proving it was "posted". Few people will read them BEFORE they arrive
with their
> plan of using whatever "fuel" they bring for their event.
>
> 5. I believe people would be relieved to be able to rent and/or purchase supplies AT the beach either provided by the
city or an
> approved purveyor. It takes too long to "educate" the public as to appropriate materials and it's usually too late.
>
> 6. There are numerous "baskets" which contain fires used on beaches in other states. A custom one is not needed.
>
> 7. Renting or buying needed supplies could offset the cost of employing someone and the four wheeler with a metal
lined trailer
> brought out at the fire curfew to "shine the light" on the need to wrap up t he festivities and discard the hot coals
properly and
> safely. This person would have the ability to communicate with officers if further support was needed.
>
> 8. We have proved unable to be good caretakers of t his precious resource and short of a moratorium, significant
measures
> need to be taken as decisions have been delayed for too long.
>
> 9. As I am usually seeing the "aftermath" of a weekend of unlimited fires, I did not think in terms of the air quality
issues, yet I
> can sympathize especially with homeowners who live just above the "approved" fire area.
>
> 10. The "non legal" area is rarely patrolled and I see evidence of many fires north of Ocean Ave. near the volleyball
>
poles and beyond.
>
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ken S m i t h Tuesday, December 02. 2014 6:49AM

Doug Schmitz; jason .burnett@gmail.com; carieharris@gmail.com; Ken Talmage Council;
Steve Dallas Council ; Council Member Beach; Sharon Friedrichsen
Beach fires
Dear City Council members,

We would like to add our voices to your meeting on December 4th in hopes of fostering better care of our
beaches.
November 28th. 2014

To the City Council,
As long term homeowners on Scenic Road we are concerned for the stewardship of our beautiful white beachfront of
Carmel. Much has changed over the years but nothing as dramatic as the Carmel beach and coastline. Now it is so
disheartening to walk the beach and come across the remains of fires, charred Jogs and blackened sand that litter our
coastline and destroy our kelp forests.
Our family has long enjoyed gatherings on the beach, including bonfires, for many years and frankly the thought of losing
that privilege was unwelcome. However after seeing tile damage that has been occurring over the last decade our family
has come to the conclusion that we can no longer ignore the fact that these beach bonfires are causing great environmental
harm. It is now time for fires to be contained and regulated. Our beach is too important a resource both for tourism and
for the beauty it holds to be destroyed by these irresponsible practices
We are in full support of removing all fires from the sand and installing permanent pits to contain the fallout from the
debris. This is a good first step in undertaking this serious problem.
Sincerely,
The Smith Family
Scenic Road
Sharon Friedrichsen
From :
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Doug Schmitz
Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:38AM
FW: Carmel beach and the fire pits
---Original Message---From: Dixie D Smith

Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:22 PM
To: Doug Schmitz
Subject: carmel beach and the fire pits
Thank you for taking this on. t have to say I've not spent a lot of time on the beach late at night to see the fires built
directly on the sand. I have seen The remains when I'm walking the beach in the morning and how dirty I Beauty is
taken away due to the aftermath of fires . I do agree required portable fire pits would restrict the mess and keep the
sand in its natural beauty. The video told it beautifully!
Sent from my !Phone
DIXIE HUGHES
AEP, CASL, CLU FINANCIAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL CAINS LIC 0376423 Office
Stockton, Ca
If you do not wish to receive email communications from New York life, please reply to this email, using the words "opt
out " In the subject line. Please copy email_optout@NewYork Life.com New York life insurance Company
51 Madison Ave.
New York, NY 10010
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Doug Schmitz
Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:21 AM
FW: Beach fires
- --Original Message---From:RichardAndref uMI

W U.
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:10 PM
To: sfreiedrichsen@ci.carmel.ca.us; Doug Schmitz
Subject: Beach fires
ll
Dear Carmel-by-the-Sea Forest and Beach Commissioners:

Regarding unlimited and unregulated fires at Carmel Beach, the t ime has come to quit permitting such fires.
This tradition was part of the early history of Carmel but has become too big and uncontrollable.
Just as we learned about negative health effects from smoking cigarettes decades ago, we now know the
negative effects of health from air pollution caused by fires . In addition, dirtying of the fabled white sand and damage to
kelp are ruining the beach and wildlife environment.
Fires on the beach are a major concern for us in deciding whether or not to move to our property in Carmel. We
hope you will act boldly to help us with that decision and to help the entire commu nity of Carmel-by-the-Sea.
Richard and Ramona Andre
Sharon Friedrichsen
Alfred Seccombe <slf.tduuoao :bo@h r'l 111>
Wednesday, December 03, 2014 4:50PM
Sharon Friedrichsen
beach fires
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
My name is Alfred Seccombe. I am current chair of the US Green Building Councl in Monterey County and
own a sustainable building company North Star Construction, on Ocean Ave. I was hom in Carmel in 1950.
My father was rector of All Saints when it was located at the present city hall and was responsible for the
building of the current church.
I think the "environmental" concerns of Sustainable Carmel are hogwash.
I AM STRONGLY OPPOSED to regulating fires on Carmel Beach. This tradition is an indelible part of the life
of anyone who grew up in this community. The spirits of John Steinbeck, Robinson Jeffers, the Plein Aire
painters, and all the Ohlone who visited that beach for 10,000 years will be greatly saddened if this ordinance
passes.
One by one the great traditions of Carmel are stolen away by newcomers who dont appreciate the spirit of the
original community.
I am afraid that when the last fire dies out on Carmel Beach, the real CarmelCarmel will die with it.
- ~ . "' --
Alfred Seccombe
North Star Construction
It
2 QQ' 16.
Carmel, CA 93922
.........
T: -
'
F:~~~~~
.......
.......
..
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
!Ji.._
Barbara Livingsto<ws g '

~
Thursday, December 04 , 2014 11:22 AM
Karen Ferlito; kathleen bang; Mike Branson; Sharon Friedrichsen; Doug Schmitz
Beach Fires
.._..
Dreadfully sorry not to be at the meeting this afternoon. I am infavor of permits for fires and limited number of t hem.
I believe that smaoke from fires is injurious to our health. I would entrtain idea of city contracting with someone to
issue permits, provide the fire makings, assign the fire pit and clean up after. I do not favor an independent contractor
dliing business at the beach. Spreading the fires along the beach may not be a bad idea especially since we now know
that the winter storms do not cleanse the beach of charcoal. . Good luck today in your deliberations. I applaud you for
your due
diligence and concern for our natural environment of beach and forest. Barbara Livingston
I do not believe that signage will have any effect on the behavior of beach goers. That is why a city contract to provide
the services above may bve a very good idea. Assigning the fire sites numbers would make it simple for people to find
ona map and go to that place for their fire. Especially helpful on crowded weekends and holidays. If we are serio us
about limiting than I hope
you will consider a veery limited number of fire permits. hank you. Barbara Livingston
Barbara Livingston
l?re a cn11
Carmel, CA 93921
E. gac611 .ga l d@ii@Sll.l if
Paiil.J!O .!Ol:J'
.
... . <. . . . . .If~"
....~--
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sandy Laughlin <fal11 at?Ofig al J1'1 1>-

Thursday, December 04, 2014 12:45 PM
Sharon Friedrichsen
a~ FROM- CA Tax payers- SANDY AND GARY LAUGHLIN-
r: 93953
Dear Ms. Friedrichsen and Mr. Schmitz,

Please accept our email regarding the Carmel-By-The -Sea Public Beach.
1. Seems like long ago there was no need for a "per day" limit of Beach Fires on our special Carmel-By-the Sea
Beach.
2. Even though we live in Pebble Beach, CA. we walk along the top part of Scenic and then go down and walk
along the shore.
3. Many times now, I have felt a sense of pity for the residents that live close to the Carmel Beach.
WHY? They pay their taxes, keep up their homes and then have to clean up the Beach Fire garbage.
4. Why not try a pilot program that sets a reservation for a Beach Fire on this marvelous Carmel
Beach?
5. Why should a beach fire be free of cost? It should not. Why do you want too many people at one
time arguing about where they are going to have a fire?
6 . Please try a new program that will solve so many issues now with the "public". This "public" needs
to be accountable for what remains on\AND IN this glorious sandy beach.
Thank you for your time,

Sandy Laughlin
-- ..---- -
Cheers, Sandy Laughlin
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sandy Laughlin <f&l& Ol?l@g 1! l'f1~~

Thursday, December 04, 2014 1:14 PM
Sharon Friedrichsen
-~'FROM- CA Tax payers- SANDY AND GARY LAUGHLIN - - :93953
.P. ,, .
Hello Sharon ! !!
Thank you ever so much for your prompt reply !
Am so delighted to hear that there is a hearing at City Hall.
I am trying to attend but now have back therapy delay. :(
I am a serious birder and bird with Biologist JeffFroke.
I didn 't bring up the smoke issue with MANY FIRES for I am not the biologist.
however- (Birds will not nest around fire and smoke)
Also I am a MIDDLE OF THE ROAD eco person.
In Short- Humans are part of nature too. So you do have a task.
Hope all goes well for you today.
Fondly,S
Cheers, Sandy Laughlin
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jeff Baron <jeff@hgronanddiRSIIs.s:g>

Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:51 AM
Mike Branson; 'David Refuerzo'; 'Karen Ferlito'; 'kathleen bang'; 'Dr. and Mrs. Michael Carter'
Sharon Friedrichsen; Doug Schmitz; nielst@:so::: s t 1ibl, f;>D CarmeiPineCone; 'Margaret
Eaton'; 'Barbara Livingston'; 'Greg D'Ambrosio'; 'Chris Hardy'; 'Linda Anderson'; 'Steve
Brooks'; FPL1oyd@r1~1lnifl sAl ; Lori Frontella
RE: Fire workshop correspondence
Hi Mike,
Will we all be receiving the proposals as well? With the workshop only one day away, I am hoping that the focus of the
meeting will be on evaluating the proposals, not affirming our mission to "do something about the problem." Without
that information made available to all, we will lose this valuable opportunity to receive public input on the specifics of
the proposals.
Also, as I have copied my fellow commissioners on this email, please include this email in the public record, and make it
available- with the others that you have just sent- to the public tomorrow.
Thanks Mike,
Jeff
From: Mike Branson [mailto:mbranson@ci.carmel.ca.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:42AM

To: David Refuerzo; Karen Ferlito; kathleen bang; Dr. and Mrs. Michael Carter; Jeff Baron
Cc: Sharon Friedrichsen; Doug Schmitz; nielsr@,QRHiillit:nl!t; PD Carmel PineCone; Margaret Eaton; Barbara Livingston;
Greg D'Ambrosio; Chris Hardy; Linda Anderson; Steve Brooks; FPLioyd~iEd3lilft.tt1fn; Lori Frontella
Subject: Fire workshop correspondence
Good Morning Everyone,

I have attached a PDF of the correspondence the City has received to date regarding tomorrows beach fire workshop.
This information will also be posted on the city web site and hard copies will be available at the workshop.
Mike
Sharon Friedrichsen
From :
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
kathleen bang <ihe'Rt'b?9?@mg

>
Friday, December 12, 2014 6:06AM
Sharon Friedrichsen
Fwd : LETTER for Subcommittee and Commissioners
SubComm ittee for Beach Fires.docx; ATT00001 .htm
a
Begin forwarded message:
From: Shirley <sst ist@:: 1

1':>
To: kathleen bang <lw:tl:;ba::g@tt:s:ssn:>
Subject: LETTER for Subcommittee and Commissioners
Date: December 11, 2014 at 2:46:54 PM PST
December 11, 2014
Dear Kathy:
I just wanted to write a letter in support of limiting the number of off the sand
fires to 26 or less . I am in favor of increasing the cleaning of the beach by city
staff and of increasing the patrolling the beach to remind people of how they
can help to preserve the fragile beach by following regulations. At the same
time, they could be invited to join in the next scheduled beach clean up so they
can have firsthand knowledge of the damage being done!
I have been horrified for years at the damage being done to our beach and to
the ocean. I believe that the theory of the ocean "cleaning the beach" in the
winter is like saying there are no waste management issues because my trash
can is empty. Just because the sand may have some of the residual fire debris
removed from the sand only means it's in the ocean with an unknown, but most
likely negative, impact .
Thank you for all your hard work on this issue. If difficult and unpopular
choices are not made at this time, I fear that we will look back from some point
in the future and be heartbroken that we did not make more of an effort.
Sincerely yours,
Shirley A Moon
Sail ;tu :ce::ie 0 11 a /a c.
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
John Cromwell <jahn@?Pn 111 1 It>

Thursday, December 18, 201411:05AM
More on beach fires
Santa Lucia stairs - charred wood 1.jpg; Santa Lucia stairs -charred wood 2.jpg; Santa Lucia
stairs - charred wood 3.jpg; Santa Lucia stairs - charred wood 4.jpg
Hi Doug and Sharon,

Thanks for both responding to my earlier email. I was not able to make the hearing but I'm sure it was a lively discussion.
After our big storms last week, we headed to the beach Friday afternoon to walk our dog. It was challenging negotiating the
stairs at the foot of Santa Lucia due to the build up of charred logs, mixed with kelp. I've attached some photos of what we
found. It seemed pretty consistent- the charred wood and charcoal seems to get pushed up to the high water mark, rather
than getting sucked back into the sea. I noticed it in several places south of 10th where the charcoal seemed to be gathered
at the high water mark.
So it reaffirms my concern that our policy of counting on big waves to clean the beach is not really a solution- and is that
really a fair way to the ocean and all the sea life?
This seems like a real problem to me.
Best regards,
John
From: Doug Schmitz <dschmitz@ci.carmel.ca.us>

Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 8:18AM
To: John Cromwell <jihs@z
sll r W
Subject: RE: Beach fires hearing
Dea r Mr. Cromwell, thank you for your email and interest in Carmel Beach. I have forwarded your transmittal to the staff
members handling this m atter so they can make copies for the Forest and Beach Commissioners. I very much appreciate
you sharing your position. Best, Doug Schmitz
From: John Cromwell [mailto: .........__ ------Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:03 PM
To: Doug Schmitz; Sharon Friedrichsen
Subject: Beach fires hearing
Hi Doug and Sharon,
My wife and I are not sure if we will be able to make it to the hearing this Thursday regarding the beach fires . We live on
Carmel Point at 24S9 San Antonio Road, just south of 14th on the west side.
The beach fires have grown to be a major issue for us from several standpoints.
Intensity of the smoke affecting local residents:
1
We have noticed a measurable increase in the number of beach fires and intensity of the smoke in our neighborhood over the
past several years. The fact that the fires are only permitted south of lOth does not make sense to us, in that the prevailing
winds push the smoke into the Carmel Point area, directly ~~roar house. It is as if Carmel decided it is ok to have fires, just
make sure the smoke does not come into our neighborhood. Just this September, during a spare the air weekend, when it
was a warm Saturday night, we had to close up all of our windows and doors because the smoke was just too thick. If smelled
as if we were in the middle of a forest fire. I ended up calling both the City of Carmel and the Monterey Air Quality District
offices to complain . I did hear back from the Monterey Air Quality District, but never from the City of Carmel. We frequently
end up having to close our windows because the wood smoke is too strong.
Health concerns:
My wife and I are both cancer survivors. We purposely did not put wood burning fireplaces in our house when we remodeled
because of the smoke. It is a known fact that burning wood fires generate considerable amounts of carcinogenic
chemicals. Much worse than cigarette smoke. Why we allow the burning of these open fires given the health and air quality
concerns makes no sense.
Beach appearance and safety:
We walk the beach nearly every morning. It is not uncommon to find smoldering fires early in the morning. Wh ile I have not
stepped on any hot embers, I have tripped over half buried firewood. Aside from the risk to children and others from still
burning fires, the biggest issue is that the beach is clearly becoming gray in many areas south of lOth, particularly as you get
closer to the embankments. It is unsightly, with immeasurable chunks of charred wood fragments and ash discoloring the
sand. The city seems to count on big waves to clean up the mess but that does not seem to be a reliable fix. And what does
that mean for what we are contributing to the health of the ocean.
Conclusion:
We would prefer that there not be any fires. If there must be fires (and I see no reason how anyone could argue that we must
have f ires) then spread them across the entire beach so they are not concentrated near the Point and funneling the smoke
and the crowds into the southern end of Carmel. Limit the absolute number of fires by requiring permits for all fires. And use
the permit fees to pay for the cleaning of the beach, not just the fire pits, but all the trash and waste left behind by the beach
fire crowds. Finally, what ever is ultimately decided upon, it must be patrolled. And there should be a simple means to report
infractions when they are happening, rather than having to wait till Monday morning to complain to the City.
We greatly appreciate your efforts in helping find a solution to this problem.
... .....
-.:.~ .....
Kind regards,
John Cromwell
t-.
- ~ "
.- .,_... .
-~ -~
... .
~
,,
IJ
..,.
Jt
'
"4' ...
' I
.
. . .' l
'
'
'
....
.
('
'~
.,
~~.
'tt
'

."
. ~.
l
Public comment for January 21, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting
Dear Planning Commission and City Council,

As a Carmel resident of over ten years and regular user of the beach in many ways, I would find it
irresponsible of you to initiate any Pilot Programs regarding beach fires on Carmel Beach without further
exploration, research, and time . . It has been clear from the beginning of this debate that the selfish
interests of a very small group of individuals has been the focus of prohibitive measures to limit fires and
potentially ban them altogether. The research has been poorly shared and misrepresented by limited
examples of "destruction" depicted in the Public Workshop, Beach Fires December 4, 2014. Run down
to the beach right now and see how it looks!
Carmel is a beautiful beach and if you've seen it lately, since we've had some winter swell and rain, it is
pristine once again. There are collection areas of debris near the walls and revetments where the sand
is much higher than the tide line. These areas are created artificially at the end of each summer to
protect the walls, staircases and revetments from winter swell erosion, by bulldozing sand from the tide
line up to the walls. As a byproduct, these areas of higher sand allow any floating or loose debris to land
as wave action and higher tides during early winter allow. These areas are concentrated with charcoal
and kelp which has been very helpful in the recent cleanup by the City. It was nice to see a backhoe and
a couple of guys clean those areas up in a day and a half. There is still some charcoa l and other debris,
but most of it is gone.
The idea of permits is the most prohibitive in my opinion. It is great to plan ahead, but that is nearly
impossible with coastal weather. Spontaneity is the beauty of the beach to most of us. We work all
week and want to spend a few wonderful hours on the beach with family and f riends around a warm fire
on a chilly night and we can't, because we don't have a permit.
The idea of fire rings presents multiple issues. Will the elements erode them and create sharp rusty
metal to step on? Will they become trash receptacles? Will people abuse them? Are they unsightly? If
we have one freak storm they will be destroyed and scattered about the beach.
Who gets a fire ring? When can you stake yours out? In the dark am hours? At 4:00pm? How many
arguments will lead to violence over fire rings. I've seen fights between dog owners on the beach and
this is way more likely create conflict.
Five permits for BBQ's???????? 26 fire rings?????? Only 31 families get to have warm food on the
entire beach???????
Unlimited use of propane heating devices?????????????? How many canisters of propane will be left on
the sand or thrown in the ocean? Or be thrown in the garbage to rupture in the back of the garbage
truck???
Or worse yet, left on the sand and picked up in the dark by a little kid and dropped in a
smoldering fire ring to explode!

Reduce the number of fires in the winter????? The water is cold in the winter and having a.fire; upon.
exiting the surf on a winter evening is one of the most enjoyable times to have a fire. There are fewer
users in the winter naturally anyway.
,,
Good dry wood, a reasonable diameter of your "pit", ENFORCEMENT and EDUCATION, are the most
logical solutions. At least look at the evidence over a full cycle or two before implementing a plan that is
poorly thought out and only a means of quick prohibition that could ruin one of Carmel's most favored
institutions for both residents and visitors.
Thank you for your time,
Trent L Davi~ / } - Concerned Resident

... I t
5 2 16S IUS
Mesa Drive, Carmel, Ca 93923
To:
Carmel-by-the-Sea Planning Commission
From :
Graeme Robertson-Resident of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Date:
January 21, 2015
Subject:
Beach Fires
1 appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Beach Fire matter. My family has
lived in Carmel for over 50 years. I attended Carmel River School, Carmel
Middle School and graduated from Carmel High School in 1977. My two younger
brothers also attended the aforementioned schools. My wife, Chris, and I have
raised our two sons, Andrew and Austin, in Carmel. There are many, many
wonderful attributesof our Village ... too many to list here. However, the Crown
Jewel is the Carmel Beach. We have enjoyed many wonderful family memories
on the Beach and we walk the Beach on a consistent basis. Our son Austin,
when he is home, surfs at the Beach several times a day. We gather with friends
and family at and on the Beach at all times of the year. The ability to gather a
group, spontaneously, for a spectacular Carmel sunset and beach fire is one of
life's great pleasures. The entire Carmel Beach has always been a sacred
ground for our family and the broader community.
I think we can all agree that the Carmel Beach is a special place for all of us and
that we care deeply about the care and maintenance of the Beach including its
long term viability. While there has been considerable work and analysis done
by the Forest and Beach Commission on the Beach Fire issue, I know it requires
significantly more input from a much wider group of community members which I
believe will produce a much better solution for our beloved Beach.
My suggestion is:
-Rake the Beach several times a week during the busy months
-Employ Ambassadors to walk the Beach to educate the people who are
building fires on the clean-up rules
-Develop a one page handout explaining the rules on Carmel Beach. The
handout would be available at all the Inns, businesses and City Hall.
There are many other ideas that could be considered with further review and
discussion.
. 'r' r- '')
. . l
' "\
.I
I appreciate the time, effort, work and analysis that have been accompli~heq thus
far; however, the issue requires much m?re worklanalys~s. The bo_~,qm ~ii~~j~> J -ll lH<~~-~o
do not support the current recommendation to the Planmng Comm&f?~\Qtlr
& Buildino
.
. Dept
Rob Mullane
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Margaret via Drop box < no-reply@dropbox.com>

Wednesday, January 21, 2015 11:09 AM
Rob Mullane
Margaret Eaton shared "Beach Fires to F&B.docx" with you
'.L .:-1
"
From Margaret :
Please distribute the attached memo to the other Planning Commission

members. I submitted this memo (along with many others since then) last
February. The only change that I have been able to see since this memo was
written is that the security officers, when they are there, have managed to
stop most fires north of 1Oth.
The smoke from beach fires is a public nuisance. It is unhealthy for the
humans and animals that breath it. We support the City 's efforts to reduce
this hazard and the other environmental problems that accompany it, most
notably the charcoal and the trash that gets left on the beach. This nuisance
Thank you for considering this request.
Maggie Eaton
Sustainable Carmel"
Click here to view
(Margaret shared these files using Dropbox. Enj oy! )
~ : t'.P.1
1
.\ , ~ . ~
f..
t .J
\. .ilv p f c: \.'1 1, w 1- i;y-llu.""Seo

Planning & Building D&pt.
"Dear Commissioner,
needs to be abated.
To: The Forest and Beach Commission, Carmel, California

From: Maggie Eaton, 26215 Hilltop Place, Carmel, California 93923
Re: Fires on Carmel Beach
Date: February 16, 2014
Almost 20 years ago, my husband and I bought a home on Carmel Point. We loved
going to the beach and would have suppers there on weekends using a campfire or
the hibachi to cook. At that time, it was very pleasant and we enjoyed the fact that
people could have fires on the beach. That pleasant experience has gradually
disappeared. We no longer go to the beach on weekend evenings for picnic
suppers-there are too many people, too many rowdy parties, and way too many
fires. The smoke can be choking and there have been increasing incidents where,
even though we live 2 blocks from the beach, we have to close our doors and
windows because of the smoke coming from the beach. I take my dogs out every
night, often walking above the beach, and have seen nights where the fires were so
numerous that I cannot count them. Many are above lOth, too big, and too close to
the beach bluff walls. I see fires built on the rocks by the Santa Lucia steps. Fires in
these places encourage others to repeat the violation. I have seen people building
fires with wood logs so large that they are thrown down the bluffs, often falling
short of the beach and tearing up the vegetation. There are now well-worn paths on
the bluffs that people use to transport heavy things onto the beach. There is also
such an accumulation of charcoal and partly burnt wood pieces that the sand is and
remains black/gray above the tide line. I understand that the City crews attempt to
remove this wood and charcoal but it is an impossible task given the large areas of
charcoal fields and the small size of the charcoal pieces. On the higher tide days, my
dogs and I walk and play closer to the bluffs where the charcoal is most plentiful. On
these days, my dogs' legs become so black with charcoal that I need to shampoo
them when we return home to prevent black smudges all over the house. Charcoal
does not wash off with just water.
Also, increasingly, the beach has become littered with trash on Saturday, Sunday,
and Monday mornings from those who have used the beach the night before. This is
happening throughout the year, not just in the summer or on holidays. Because of
that trash and the fact that my dogs will eat abandoned trash (melted chocolate
from s'mores, chicken bones, poopy baby diapers, and other harmful stuff), I no
longer enjoy walking my dogs off leash on the beach on weekend mornings. My
neighbors and I have taken to bringing trash bags with us to pick up what people
have left behind since the City clean-up crews don 't arrive until Tuesdays. Clean-up
efforts by local volunteer groups, although laudable, are also too infrequent and
cannot possibly come close to remedying the problem. And too often, the high tides
carry away this trash.
'-
After years of witnessing these problems, I started photographing. And, for over a
year, and since I joined Sustainable Carmel, I have been going periodically to the
beach on weekend evenings and handing out a Sustainable Carmel bookmark that
lists the beach rules. I ask that people take their trash away with them and I give
them a trash bag if needed. l also remind people to follow the beach fire rules.
Many people in these encounters have told me that they are not aware of any beach
rules. And, while most people say they will comply, it is clear that too many do not.
Some are even scornful of the approach and they tell me that they use the fire to
burn their trash or that they bury both their fires and trash. At first I thought these
were jokes but l have seen (and photographed) evidence that people are doing just
that.
I have reached a major conclusion from these beach walks and patrols-- that beach
fires and trash are linked: there are too many people now using the beach because
fires are allowed. More and more of the trash left on the beach is related to the
fires-cut clothes hangers used as food skewers, plastic and Styrofoam packages
that contained raw meat, charcoal lighter, fire extinguishers, etc. Further (from my
conversations with beach users building fires), these people most often do not live
in Carmel (or live here only part time). This means that they do not see what the
beach looks like after they leave and, combined with the fact that there is no
enforcement of beach rules, these visitors have little incentive to make the effort to
leave the beach clean. Also, given the trash left behind, it is clear that much of the
picnic shopping supplies are not coming from Carmel shops. The plastic shopping
bags (now banned in Carmel), the large quantities of plastic cups, cutlery, beer &
soda&water, and paper supplies etc indicate that our beach picnickers are shopping
at places like Safeway or big box stores. I conclude from this that it would be difficult
to make a case for any economic benefit to Carmel of allowing beach fires to
continue unabated as they are now.
It breaks my spirit to see how trashed the beach has become and how the joy of
being there has diminished. My neighbors and I now spend too much time on the
beach grousing about the degradation and the mess. I am nostalgic for the days
when beach fires were few and the sand was clean. But unfortunately, those days
are gone. The harm I witness (wild animals and dogs scavenging at the picnic sites,
the piles of trash some of which gets washed out to sea, the smoke pollution, and the
charcoal fields, plus the costs and time of beach trash collection) has exceeded any
benefit that I can identify of allowing an increasing number of visitors to build fires
and then walk away from the mess they have created.
I encourage the City of Carmel to remedy these problems. A moratorium on beach
fires will allow for thoughtful and comprehensive plans to be developed, phased in,
and tested to prevent the harm from both the beach fires and the trash. Thank you
for your consideration of this request.
All of these photos below were taken between the Santa Lucia steps and the next
steps to the north at 13th Avenue
Trash next to several beach fires, Sunday, 9 AM, April 2012 (note charcoal next to
stone wall where another fire had burned just under hanging vegetation)
Part of the charcoal debris field near the stone walls north of the Santa Lucia Steps,
mber 2013
. .
~ .. ~
...
....
.. --::- ' -
:--:-- . ;
--
. . . . ..
:" .
'
,.,
: _.
~ -
~....
-..
..
Fires on the rocks
-. ~
.
-. ..
'
'
; '
... -
~-
~ :z.
~~~~.. .-~
--.
I
. ..
--
-.
..
.-
This fire had pieces of burned plastic in it. Note the footprints of sea birds which
scavenge pi.cnic sites early every morning
...
.. ... ..
..
, .
A pig roast late AM in Sept 2013 where the wood had been burning in the sand for
hours before the pig was laid and covered with corrugated tin. The wood and pig for
this fire had been conveyed/thrown to the beach down the bluff
of the charco
--Part
-
~
- "
...... ,.. ( t
.:..;.t~ <t
. "
~-
.'.*--
. .
-~ '"_;:t.
.;
,...
..~
;-
..
d
.
~ ~
:. -~ .... .> -..:, ~.- :
. ,,
..,_
- . .......
,. >~~- -i~
:.-;
'.
fire that had been buried with coals still warm
... -
._:~,~....
: :~._.~ ,
. ....
. . .. . . .. ~~
_,
:~.:
"'
. , -
.
:...
..
..
..... ..
..r:.":
.
ill
..
.,.,
~
. :'-
.. . /
, .. I
.
..
... . "
~ . .
.II
... J
... . ;
... .. .
_.- r--
~- '!
'
.. . " 4-
... .
::- .
,
.
,:-.-._
.~.
.... .;.....
;: .:;.""'.-e.- ._ "'... :!.:.,'J:f.-

1
t_
-~
'!
.:'
...,
~~' --" ... =~ ~ i. ... ..

~
ttl:,'. --
..
~~.... "
. ..
----~ "'!r~:
.. .~
,.
..
... :.. .. ,, ,. .: .. ;;:;f':: - :\, :- :..... ..

. !C:_- ":., .: ..
. .. .
r. .
..
t ;t_ _..
~~
J.
..
.O:to
~
~
..
~
.,
.~
.. -..
... .,.r. ,.._

',c:
--~
. ~ ;~~
0#
'
.... . .
~ . -~
-~:'.... -~; ..4-::

-*'t ...
~""
...
.
.
..... ....
,-...... -.-~. ....
...... A
..., -~"
... .. ....;..
~
.'
..
.. . !
. ... ..
... . . r....- , -)_....
...; .......-
.ft-
..
- .. ...... .
'I
.....
-.-
"" VII.
Dog's leg coated with charcoal after being on the beach, January, 2014
Sharon Friedrichsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Doug Schmitz
Tuesday, January 20, 2015 5:55 PM
Sharon Friedrichsen; Rob Mullane
FW : Beach Fire Pits
HI. .. would you please make sure the PC has this for its meeting on beach fires? Thanks.
From: rabbibruce@ul z~[mailto:Abbib: as @

Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 5:23 PM
To: Doug Schmitz
Subject: Beach Fire Pits
l:csPA]
Dear Mr. Schmitz,

Could you please share with the city council and those making decisions about the fire pits on the beach that historically
Congregation Beth Israel has held a end of Sabbath Havdalah Service with a camp fire once a month on a Saturday night
during the summer months for the last 20 years . My fear is that if there is not a reservation or permit system, the 26 fire
pits will be quickly claimed early on Saturdays and that our congregation will not be able to hold this monthly program .
I hope that some form of reservation or permit process is developed so that our synagogue can continue to hold these
special monthly events on Carmel Beach.
Thank you so much for your assistance with this. I would be there in person to share this message tomorrow, but I have
Hebrew school at the time of tomorrow's meeting!
Sincerely,
Rabbi Bruce D. Greenbaum

Congregation Beth Israel
Carmel, CA
"80 I II I 10 II
Sharon Friedrichsen
From :
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
scott@oa1 11 :eli :Bta: .a: g

Tuesday, January 06, 2015 4:07 PM
Report for Special Planning Commission Meeting, 21 Jan 2015
Summary of Effort.pdf
Sharon, Mike,
I hope you are well, and that you had an enjoyable holiday period.
Please forward the attached report to the Planning Commission for inclusion into the agenda packet for the
Special Meeting Regarding Beach Fires, to be held on 21 Jan 2015.
Thank you,
Scott
Scott McKenzie
Director, Carme/Natur
881 11 101'8'
9Ult@ll
l::&bi.BI
Website I Twitter I Facebook
SUMMARY OF EFFORT
By
CARMELNATUR
Regarding the formulation of Beach Fire Solutions for Carmel By-The-Sea
June to December, 2014
PROPOSAL FOR PILOT PROJECT

Permanently Restoring and Preserving
Carmel Beach Sands and Bluff
Utilizing a Non-Profit Commercial Activity
Each year, thousands of residents and visitors enjoy our beautiful beaches. Our dog
and bonfire friendly beaches are known throughout the world. What a blessing it is
to watch the sun set over the Pacific Ocean and then enjoy a traditional bonfire with
family and friends in one of the most beautiful places on Earth!
There is a cost for everything however. The reality is that charcoal and ash are the
byproducts of wood fires, and status quo beach operation s lay the burden of these
costs in the sand. Additiona lly, bonfires require transporting wood to the beach.
Current beach operations require that to be done on an individual basis, resulting in
traffic congestion on Scen ic Road, and damage to the fragile bluff.
At CarmeiNatur, we are dedicated to preserving the wonderful, unique, and

traditional bonfire opportunity, while shifting the cost burden from the environment
to the consumer (beachgoer). We will also work to repair environmental damage
that has already occurred. Ultimately, beachgoers will enjoy their bonfires on
pristine white sand.
We can and will do this without an increase in taxes, or expens ive governmental
oversight, management, or enforcement. At the same time, we will add jobs, which
will add revenue to the city!
Proposed is a one-year pilot project, jointly undertaken by CarmeiNatur, and the

City of Carmel. CarmeiNatur, a non-profit organization with a miss ion to restore
and preserve Carmel to a more natural state, will perform labo r and managem ent
of beach bonfires south of 1oth Avenue . When CarmeiNatur achieves its goal of
clean sand in one year, they will be granted exclusive rights to the operation for a
period of 10 years.
NATUR
DEDICATED TO RESTORING AND PRESERVING CA RMEL, CALI FORNIA
Wood is stored at a City Facility. Tree cuttings by city-employed personnel will be

added to the supply. Any additional wood required will be supplied by
CarmeiNatur.
A truck, owned and maintained by CarmeiNatur, wil l be stored at a City Facility.
The uniformed CN Crew loads truck with supplies 1 at 2pm and drives to the beach.
They distribute supplies between two stations, indicated by a yel low sta r in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Diagram of Carmel City Beach
The North Station is responsible for managing bonfires in the area between 1oth and
12th Avenues (shaded in green,) while the South Station is responsible for the area
south of 12th (shaded in blue). These areas are subject to adjustment as bonfire
demands are quantified.
Load will include wood, firepits, safety equipment chute, bbq coals, Ash Bins,
Ember-Ash Collection Device, Shove ls, Charcoal Sieves, Charcoal Buckets, La rge Bins
for Cold Charcoal Storage, Firestarters, Lighters, Fireproof Gloves (oth er safety
equipment), Instruction Cards/Flyers (with QRC code to App), iPhones with Apps for
Reserving/Paying for Firepits, Deluxe Firepits, and f lags.
VIEWS
I BEACHES I AVENUES I WATER I ENERGY I FOOD

2
www.carmelnatur.org
CARM:L NATUR
DEDICATED TO RESTORING AND PRESERVING CARMEL, CALIFORNIA
During the pilot, CarmeiNatur will test various methods for deploying and
recovering supplies. The goal will be to make the operation as efficient,
inconspicuous, and unobtrusive as possible, with the minimal expenditure of
human effort. These tests will include chutes and wheeled vehicles.
Once supplies are in place, the CN Crew will spend time clearing charcoal out of the
sand using special ly designed hand trowels with a sieve at the handle. Coa l is
separated from the sand and emptied into buckets. Buckets are then emptied into
wheeled 35-gallon contai ners. Charcoal recovered from the beach will be used in
firepits.
During the pilot period, it will be necessary to implement a public education
campaign, including, but not limited to: a TV news stories; notices on the Carmel City
website; Internet ads; public service announcements; and hotel flyers. As the final
bastion of information, extra personnel acting as greeters, must be deployed at all
beach access points during peak beachgoer arrival times. These personnel must be
armed with talking points and information flyers, so that beachgoers who arrive
expecting to burn their own wood can be redirected before they expend significant
energy. This will minimize beachgoer frustration and significantly aid in the
assimilation process. During the pilot period, the City of Carmel will assist
CarmeiNatur in the financial and logisti cal arrangements of the public education
effort.
As beachgoers arrive, some will already be aware of the new process, and some will
not. Greeters will be deployed in front of temporary information boards at each
stairwel l, armed with smiles, information flyers, and flags. If a beachgoer intends to
enjoy a bonfire, then they will be handed an information flyer and a red flag
attached to a stick. There are only two things the beachgoer must do from that
point: 1) proceed to their desired spot on the beach and plant the flag, and 2) using
their smart phone, browse to the CarmeiNatur website and purchase a fire. The CN
Crew will do the rest of the work.
The CarmeiNatur website will allow for customer accounts to be created, so that
return visits by the same beachgoer will be further simplified.
The CN Crew down on the beach will monitor their iPhon es for customer demand,
and mon itor the beach for red flags. A CN Crewmember will patrol the beach with a
wheeled cart containing wood and firepits, with the assistance of another CN
Crewmember on the bluff (acting as lookout). As the CN Crewmember approaches
a party of beachgoers displaying a red f lag, he or she will greet them warmly and set
up their fire pit, ensuring that the location meets all City Regulations. The fire will be
seeded with a firestarter, so that a match or a lighter will start it. As the CN
Crewmember departs, he or she will recover the flag for future use. The CN
Crewmember will also remind the party that he or she will return periodically to
refresh th eir supply of wood.
VIEWS

3
www.carmelnatur.org
.< : NATUR
When a party is ready to depart, they can "check out" using their smartphone. At
this time, but no later t han 1Opm, a CN Crewmember wi ll return to the ir site and
recover the ashes, embers, and firepit. This wi ll be done using the same wheeled
carts that were used to deliver the wood and firepit. The cart lid will be closed on
the embe rs to extinguish them. When completely coo l, the resulting coals will be
separated from the ash and reused .
: ..- !Cine.! ana lustitication
At this poi nt, it is estimated that a charge of $30 per bonfire is an achievable goal.
Different pricing structures can be discussed and explored, including a "per hour"
structure.
At least half of th at charge could replace the cost an d effort that the beachgoer
would ordinarily expend purchasing and hauling their own wood to the beach. The
other half is ju stifiably reasonable as an "e nvironmental impact fee". These factors
help m ake this a "good deal" in the eye of a beachgoer. As an added incentive, a
beachgoer visi ting during the pilot year will be offered the opportunity to receive a
free fire in exchange for volunteer service. Any beachgoer that fills a 5-gallon bucket
with coals retrieved from the sands will receive a free fire. Tools to aid in the
harvesting of coa ls will be provided by CarmeiNatur.
The res idents of Carme l will not incur any additional costs in taxes or fees (un less
they inten d to have a bonfire). Additionally, they wil l rega in their white sand
beaches and the bluffs will be restored. These factors make it a "win" for the
re sidents.
Business owners will benefit from happier tourists.
The City Government will not be burdened with any additional processes or
management and they wi ll achieve success in their beach restoration efforts.
_ Jlltt:lrt
In responding to this proposa l, please contact:

Scott McKenzie
831-241 -1376
scott@carm elnatur.org
c_ur1%t1~
~ cottA.
McKenzie
VI EWS

4
www.ca rmel natur. org
CARMEL BEACH COMM ISSION NEEDING RIGOR IN

D ECISION-MAKING
6/26/2014
On June 25th, a special session of the Carmel Forest and Beach Commission convened on the Carmel
Beach at 13th Avenue. In the sand, orange cones were placed to represent potential spots for semipermanent concrete fire pits.
The Commission is under pressure from some members of the Carmel-by-the-Sea community to find a
solution to the blight that beach bonfires fires have brought to the sand and banks of our uniquely
beautiful slice of coastal paradise. The once-pristine white sands, in the abse nce of any significant
sand-cleansing winter storms, is now sadly gray. Freckles of black charcoal mark the coves- some of
which has been used to write graffiti on the rock walls . The banks of ice plant are lined with well-worn
human paths, used daily by children and adults alike. In short, the beach is a disaster.
It's fair to say that the Commission is desperately searching for solutions. Whether or not they are
going about it in a systematic way is up for debate. There is a significant amount of pre-supposing,
emotion, opinion, and passion being injected (by both the Commission and the public) into what is likely
to be one of the most significant pivots in the history of this small-town-by-the-sea. Of course, this
paragraph is also an opinion (mine,) but its basis is the lack of any published, methodical analysis of
the problem.
I realize that knowledge of systems engineering is not, should not, and could not be a requirement for
board membership, but, as a systems engineer, I am suggesting that good advice should always be
solicited when it is available.
One Commissioner called Carmel "the last city in the nation to allow unrestricted fires on the
beach". The resu lting contribution to the haphazard effort was a list of restrictions that other coastal
communities have enacted in various attempts to solve their problems. That's a good start, but a
thorough ana lysis of our problem it is not.
In my opinion, being in the position of "The Last Frontier for Unrestricted Beach Fires" presents a
unique opportunity to prove to the world that it CAN BE DONE, and IT CAN BE DONE RIGHT. We
have a rare and golden opportunity to LEAD. We should not shy away from that. I do not mean to
recommend we ignore the attempts of other cities- only that we include them into a systematic analysis
of alternatives. However, it seems the inclination is to jump into restrictions and limitations.
CarmeiNatur contends that white-sand beaches and unrestricted fires are NOT mutua lly
exclusive, and we 've performed a cursory syste ms analysis that supports our contention. Is there
anyone out there that can convince the City of Carmel to contract a Systems Engineer to help them
make good decisions on this highly important topic? We can recommend a good one !
FIXING CARMEL BEACH: APPLYING SYSTEMS

ENGINEERING TO THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
7/1/2014
Recently, the task of fixing the Carmel City Beach Problem has landed on the plate of Carmel-by-theSea's local government. The Forest and Beach Commission, the City Council, and the City
Administrator, all working within the framework constructed of various State and Federal laws and
agencies, must craft some solution that will (hopefully) maintain the public's long tradition of beach
bonfires, while eliminating (or reducing to tolerable levels) the numerous environmental impacts they
cause (viz., the ash and charcoal-ridden sand, the smoke, and the damage to the bluff). Sounds
daunting, right?
Put yourself in the shoes of a lawmaker for a moment. Not Draco's, of course. Draco was that 7thcentury Athenian statesman and lawmaker, from whom we derived the adjective "draconian", meaning
"unforgiving rules or laws".
But seriously ... imagine that you've been tasked to fix a public problem by way of writing and enacting a
law. Let's say that the problem at hand is a contentious one, with a vast spectrum of opinion seemingly
supporting an equally vast spectrum of possible solutions. Each opinion is delivered with a varying
amount of emotion , passion, and volume. The opinions are held by a large variety of stakeholderssome with great power (e.g., the lawmakers,) some with significant power (e.g., lobbyists, political
donors, and other influential individuals or businesses,) some with very little power (e.g., the average
voter,) and some with no power at all (e.g., the uninformed or disengaged voter).
Your job as a lawmaker is to serve your constituency, which includes everyone on the power spectrum
(including the disengaged voter). How difficult would it be to craft the j ust and fair solution with all those
loud and passionate voices in your ears?
"Difficult," I say. Unless ...
What if there was a structured process by which one could optimize systems or processes (that is,
minimize the negative aspects and maximize the positive aspects)? If only there was a body of
literature - a science if you will - that dealt with problem solving, regardless of the domain of the
problem?
Oh, but there is! It's called Systems Engineering.
NASA defines System Engineering as ". .. a robust approach to the design, creation , and operation of
systems. In simple terms, the approach consists of identification and quantification of system goals,
creation of alternative system design concepts, performance of design trades, selection and
implementation of the best design, verification that the design is properly built and integrated, and postimplementation assessment of how well the system meets (or met) the goals. "
But, what is a "system"? A system is anything that has an input, a process , and an output. Some
systems have multiple inputs, processes , and outputs. Our bodies are systems. Food, air, water,
images, sounds, and other inputs go in, countless processes (such as metabolism and respiration) run
their courses, and outputs (such as work, thoughts, words, sounds, and some other things) go out.
The Solar System is a system (a well-named one). The Earth is a System. Nations are
systems. Governments are systems. And .. . the things that governments regulate are systems!
The Carmel Beach is no exception . The beach has inputs (e .g., beachgoers, firewood , dogs, food , food
wrappers, etc., ) and it has outputs (ash , smoke, charcoal, trash , footprints, happiness, etc.) And it has
a process (you may witness it for yourself on any evening).
With regard to the beach fires, I say it is the process that needs fixing . Draco may have preferred to
simply remove some or all of the inputs. But then , he wasn't a Systems Engineer, and history shows
that he wasn't too concerned with the welfare of the stakeholders (his constituents).
How can we save ourselves from a Draconian end to our beloved "beach bonfire with family and
friends" and still solve the very real and troublesome problems we face with the beach environment?
Systems Engineering. With it, we all have the best opportunity to be happy. Without it, some of us
might be happy, but many, many others will not.
CARMEL BEACH FIRES: WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?

9/12/2014
The beach fire process used by Carmel should aim to meet beachgoer demand, given defined limits for
environmental impact and nuisance. The process for beach fires should be optimized for safety,
capacity, and environmental impact but also should be straightforward enough that all can easily
understand it. Carmel's current process, however, could easily be characterized as a "free-for-all", for
which the entire cost burden is borne by the sand and air, to the annoyance of everyone. The
inefficiency of the current beach fire process represents a significant environmental and nuisance
burden for the city, which is yet to be quantified. Using a beach fire process proposed by CarmeiNatur,
which shifts the cost of the fires to the consumer of the fires, in exchange for a beach fire service run by
a non-profit city partner, we can once again enjoy a clean beach and reduced smoke hazard, while
residents and visitors alike can continue to enjoy safe, spontaneous beach fires with family and friends.
AD HOC BEACH FIRE SUBCOMMITTEE NOT BEING

S.M.A.R.T. ABOUT PROBLEM SOLVING
10/10/2014
"A t this very moment, a team of two people are

architecting the future of the public 's Carmel beach fire experiences."
That statement ma y or may not raise the hair on the back of you r neck. You might rest easily if
yo u knew that the team had a clearly defined set of goals and objectives. You might rest eve n
more easi ly if you knew they were following a structured process for problem solving.
What if I said, "They don't and they aren't"? Scared yet?
Before I proceed , let me just say that my critique concerns the performance of the Ad Hoc
Subcommittee for Beach Fires ("the subcommittee" ,) and is in no way meant as a personal
atta ck. The subco mmittee members are, by all a ppeara nces, decent, nice, people with good
intentions and good hearts . But, should they be architecting (what will become) perma nent
regulations for Ca rmel beach fires? In my opinion , no. I know that sounds harsh and unfair on
the surface. Allow me to explain how I formed this opinion.
No activity will succeed unless a clea r set of goals and objectives are first established. For
sma ll tasks, such as washing the d ish es, we do thi s subconsciously, but for large, important
tasks that will be subject to critica l review (especially critica l review from the public,) goals and
obj ecti ves must be written in detail, published, and understood by the public before any work is
undertaken.
Why? There are at least a couple of reasons.
One is that publi c serva nts have a fiduciary responsibility to their constituency. The public will
judge the public se rva nts on the achievement of their tasks. But, if the tasks aren't defined (or
are poorly defined ,) the public is denied a method with which to judge either the servants or
their activities. Loose ca nnons come to mind. Loose cann ons may or may not hit the intend ed
target, and they're pretty much guaranteed to cause collateral damage .
Another reason for a clear set of goals and objectives is that it saves time and effort. It's
intuitively obvious that, if we know where we're going and how to get there, we'll get there
faster and with less wasted effort! It's why we plan our cross country trips or multiple errands
around town.
Establi sh ing goals and objectives isn't rocket science. Goals are general. Objectives are
specific and support the achievement of a goal. There are many resources online that
describe the process. Here's one. Here's a nother. Note that both of these come comp lete
with a handy mnemonic to rem in d us how to generate effective goals. It's
S.M.A.R.T. Objectives should be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant (to the Goal},
and Time-specific.
To understand, let's take a look at our dishwashing activity. You might say to yourself, "I'm
going to clean these dishes." That's your goal. Then, you say to yourself, "I'm going to pick up
each dish, scrub it with warm, soapy water until it is free of food, rinse it with fresh, warm water
until it's free of soap, and set it in the strainer to dry. I will repeat this process until every dish
is in the strainer. I have 15 minutes to do this, because I have to go to work." Those are your
(unspoken) objectives.
So, how'd we do? Were we S.M.A.R.T.? Let's see. The objectives were fairly specific. A
person could probably use them as an instruction set. Are they measurable? Sure. Count the
dishes in strainer. It should equal the number that was in the sink. Inspect each dish for
food. There should be none. Are they achievable? Yes. Very. Are they Relevant to the
goal? Yes. Each objective contributed to the goal of cleaning the dishes. Were they Timespecific? Yes, you gave yourself 15 minutes.
What if you just had the goal and no objectives? Is "clean" defined? No. Did you set a time
limit? No. Did you state exactly how many dishes you 'd clean? No. You could remove most
of the food from a few of the dishes over a period of ten days, and you'd still achieve your goal.
Now, let's take a look at the published (o n 10/9/2014) objectives of the subcommittee. This is
the only set of published goals from the subcommittee. Presumably, this is what we (the
public) will use to determine if we can say "mission accomplished," at the end of the
process. This comes from slid e 62 (hand -written number on left side) of the Forest & Beach
Agend a Packet Part 2 - Oct 9 2014. These are transcribed word-for-word here:
Alternatives suggested by citizens range on a continuum from ban fires to do

nothing. Banning fires is not being explored, however, doing nothing is also not
acceptable.
Forest and Beach Commission has chosen to find a middle ground, that is, to address
the issues of environmental impact on Carmel Bay, the air, and the beach , as wel l as
issues of trash, crowds, safety and reputation while still preserving the tradition of beach
fires in Ca rmel.
Obviously, these aren't S.M.A.R.T. I won't go through all the reasons why. Frankly, there are
too many to discuss in this blog post. Suffice it to say, the public are at the mercy of the
unspoken, unwritten agendas of the subcommittee members, and will be in a very poor
position at the end of this process. Also, the subcommittee will be able to claim victory in
every instance.
Now, why do I believe it is not within the capability of the subcommittee members to architect a
sensible solution? It's because I've tried to help them on the right track for a few months, and
not much has changed. One need only read my blog from its inception to see that.
Input Provided to Carmel Forest & Beach Subcommittee

for
Beach Fire Process Improvement
4 September 2014
Scott McKenzie, Director of CarmelNatur, met with Carmel Forest & Beach Commissioners
Kathy Bang and Michael Carter, along with Mike Branson, City Forester, in the Carmel Public
Works offices on Junipero, between 4 th and 5th Street. The meeting was conducted at the
request of the Chairman of the Forest & Beach Commission (FBC) during the August 28,
2014 meeting of that commission.
This is a report of that meeting.
The purpose of the meeting was to provide input to the subcommittee in the manner
provided by other interested community organizations, such as the Carmel Residents
Association, the Friends of the Forest, SAND, the Innkeepers Association, the Chamber of
Commerce, Carmel High School's Environmental Club, and others.
No specific solution was sought or pushed by CarmelNatur at this meeting, though it was
recognized that CarmeiNatur had previously published a potential solution to the beach fire
problem. Rather, CarmelNatur sought to provide input on the process by which the
subcommittee might take, if it were inclined to do so.
It is the opinion of CarmelNatur that the subcommittee has lacked rigor in its problemsolving process. This opinion had been made known to the FBC during the 8/28/2014
meeting. It was reiterated during this meeting.
It is the hope of CarmelNatur that the subcommittee adopts a structured, methodical,
transparent process that will produce an optimized solution, based on a complete set of
traceable requirements, for the stakeholders. In doing so the subcommittee will be well
positioned to offer the FBC a defendable, measurable, recommended solution. In turn, the
FBC will be able to present the solution to the community for comment, modify the solution
in committee (as needed,) and forward it to the City Council, via other authorities (as
approp riate,) for ratification.
It is the opinion of CarmelNatur that the adoption of well-established and accepted
principles of Systems Engineering be employed in the problem solving process. The initial
steps of this process can be simplified to the following:
1. Identify stakeholders
V IEWS

www.carmelnatu r.org 1831-241-1376
CARM ELNATUR
2.
3.
4.
5.
Craft a and publish a mission statement for the subcommittee

Decompose mission statement into requirements (modify with stakeholder input)
Determine metrics by which success will be measured
Determine constraints for the solution set
There are further steps, including crafting possible solutions and performing an analysis of
alternatives, testing (verification and validation), etc. However, only these first steps were
presented to the subcommittee.
In addition to presenting the steps, CarmelNatur provided opinions regarding suggested
outcomes at which the subcommittee might arrive, were it to utilize the suggested process.
Again, no solutions were offered during this process.
What follows is the actual input provided to subcommittee by CarmelNatur, as modified
during the discussion. It begins with a list of possible stakeholders:
Stakeholders
1. Local Residents
2. Beachgoers
3. Local Government
4. Coastal Commission
5. The Environment
6. Local Business Owners
Mission Statement
Next, a potential mission statement for the subcommittee was offered. The assumption is
that we are trying to find a way to continue to offer beach fire opportunities, but ones that
neither make the beach dirty nor produce as much smoke:
The mission of this Carmel Forest and Beach subcommittee is to create a process whereby
beachgoers have safe, enjoyable, opportunities for beach fires and barbeques that respect the
surrounding environment
Mission Statement Derivations

Next, a suggested decomposition of the mission statement was offered. This produced a
beginning set of requirements for the potential solution. Each word of the mission
statement has a purpose, and the objective of this portion of the process is to tease out that
purpose. For example, we want to know, "What does the word 'safe' mean, in the context of
beach fire opportunities?" According to this initial decomposition, the answer is that we
want to maximize air quality, and minimize the hazards to beachgoers in the form of trip
hazards, burn hazards, and physical exertion hazards.
VI EWS I BEAC HES I AVENIJI~S I \VATER
I ENERGY I FOOD
www.c1rnll~l n;ltur.org I 83 1 -~~~ 1-137 CJ
2
CARMELNATUR
For the noun phrases within the mission statement, such as 'beach fires', 'barbeques', and
'surrounding environment', we should seek to provide solid definitions.
1. Safe
a.
b.
Maximize
i. Air quality
Minimize
i. Trip hazards
ii. Burn hazards
iii. Required physical exertion
2. Enjoyable
a.
b.
Maximize
i. Process
1. Transparency
2. Comprehension
ii. Sense of freedom
Minimize
i. Hassle
1. Time
2. Frustration
3. Intervention
4. Complexity
3. Opportunities
a.
b.
Maximize
i. Availability
Minimize
i. Cost to beachgoers
4. Beach Fires and BBQs

a.
Definition:
i. Size Restrictions
ii. Fuel Restrictions
5. Surrounding Environment
a.
Definition:
i. Natural, earthbound environment
1. Animate
2. Inanimate
ii. Local air mass
111. Human and pet population within x distance from beach
6. "Respect the surrounding environment"

a.
Maximize
i. Natural appearance of beach
1. Maximize
a. Clean sand
i. Minimize
1. Charcoal
2. Ash
3. Trash
2. Minimize
a. Man-made appurte na nces
VIEWS

; vvvw.cnmeln a tur.llrg 1 811 -24 1- 137(,
CARJ\JIELNATUR
i. Signage
ii. Fencing
m. Permanent/Semi-Permanent Appurtenances
b. Damage to the bank
c. Damage to sea walls
i. Smoke
ii. Graffiti
b. Minimize
i. Impact to local residents
1. Minimize
a. Smoke
b. Signage
c. Man-made appurtenances
d. Tax impact
Measuring Success
No solution can be successful if metrics and measurements for success are not defined.
Therefore, for each requirement above, a set of metrics was offered. Metrics can be
qualitative (subjective) or quantitative (objective). Qualitative measurements are done
usually through survey or observation. Quantitative measurements can be made directly,
and usually result in numeric values that can be graphed.
Of course, these metrics may require limits. For instance, a minimum air quality may be set
as a constraint. Options for limits were not offered during the meeting, only that they
should be considered.
1. Safety
a. Quantitative (direct measurement)
i. Air quality
ii. Injuries to Beachgoers
1. Trip injuries
2. Burn injuries
3. Injuries from physical exertion
2. Enjoyableness
a. Qualitative (survey)
i. Process
1. Transparency
2. Comprehension
ii. Sense of freedom
iii. Hassle
1. Time
2. Frustration
3. Intervention
4. Complexity
3. Opportunity Rate
a. Quantitative
i. Average Availability rate
1. # beachgoers that had a fire/# beachgoers that wanted a fire
VIEWS
I BEACHES I 1\VENUES I WATER I ENERGY I FOOD

'V\V\\'.C<1rme lnatur.n rg I 83 1-2 11-1 3 76
4
CARMELNATUR
ii. Cost to beachgoers

4. Environmentallmpact
a. Quantitative
i. Natural appearance of beach
1. Clean sand
a. Average Charcoal Contamination Rate
i. Volume of charcoal/Volume of sand
b. Average Ash Contamination
i. Color analysis of sand
c. Average Trash Contamination Rate
i. Weight of beach trash removed/day
ii. Man-made appurtenances
1. Signage
a. Square footage
2. Fencing
a. Square footage of view blockage
3. Permanent/Semi-Permanent Appurtenances
a. Square footage
iii. Damage to the bank
1. Length of trails
2. Count of individuals caught traversing
iv. Damage to sea walls
1. Smoke
a. Color analysis
2. Graffiti
a. Count of markings/day
v. Impact to local residents
1. Smoke
a. Air quality measurements
2. Man-made appurtenances
3. Tax impact
a. Total City Cost of Implementation
i. Time
ii. Materials
b. Annual City Cost of Operation
i. Time
ii. Materials
b. Qualitative
i. Impact to local residents
1. Smoke
2. Man-made appurtenances
3. Natural appearance of beach
Constraints
Constraints were discussed as a concept. Examples of possible constraints that were
offered to the subcommittee were Commercial Activity Restrictions and Legislation (after
amendments, if possible).
VIEWS
I f~E/\CHES I AVENUES I WATER I ENERGY I FOOD

www .c.lr lll t' lll :l tur.nrg I 83 l - 2 , ~1 -1:37CJ
5
CARMELNATUR
The Systems Engineering Process

The following graphic was presented as one of many available visual depictions of the
Systems Engineering Process. This one has been borrowed from NASA:
Trade-Oil studie6
E~Malyses
RISk Managemenl
Decompose to LIMM-L- Func:uons

AJtocate l'erlom>8nce and OVlef l.mOig Req~emenls
to AI Functional l-'6
DelneiReftne FtlncUooll tntertaces (tntemaiiEJ<ternal)
OeftneiReltnellf9llle FLnCiionlll ArcMect\n
Cooligunlbon Management
lntMace Management
Data Manllgemenl
Peft'omance Measurement
- SEMS
- TPM
- Tedlnlcal Reviews
Dnlgn Loop
Synthesla
, ,__
...;.;....~
Ttan6tlml A1ct111ecMes (Functtonal to Physlcafj

Deline Allematllle System Concepts, Conttgurallon
nems and system Elements
Setecl Prelllned Prcxu:t and l'roce$$ SoUiCns
DelneiRetne Physlcallnter111ce6 (lnlernai/Extemalj
Related Terma:
Proceea Output
CUstomer = Drgarudon6 responsltlle 10r Prinwy Function6
Pnmary Fundlcns = DeYeiOpmeol, ~lniCtion. Vetillcation.

Depklymenl Opendiorl6. 514Jport, ll'anlg, OispOSIII
Systems Etemenls = Har-e. Software. Plnonnel. Faatr11es. Oala. Maten81.
SeMoes.T~
OeYelopmenl Lewt Dependent
- Decision DalabaSe
- System/Conllgtnlion ttem
Arehotectwe
- Spedllcatlons and Basetines
In summary, it is the opinion (and concern) of CarmelNatur that the subcommittee may
persist with an ad hoc process. It is readily apparent that the subcommittee has no defined
mission, except for two "guiding principles" which are actually artificial constraints on any
potential solutions at which the subcommittee might arrive.
It is also readily apparent, based on their published notes in the 8/28/2014 meeting
agenda, that the subcommittee has arrived at a "solution" of a limited number of semipermanent fire pits. Now, they have turned their attention to the size, shape, composition,
quantity, and location of the fire pits, along with the fuel that will be burned in them. Again,
this opinion is based on published FBC notes.
All of this has been determined without a (transparent, published) discussion of what is
required of the subcommittee.
VIEWS I BEAC HES I AVENUES I WATER
I ENERGY I FOO D
'. \ ' Ww.carnw l n;Hur.lln~
1831-241 -137()
CARMELNATUR
CarmeiNatur continues to affirm the good intentions of the subcommittee. It also intends
only professional criticism of their work. Lastly, it only seeks to help the subcommittee
arrive at a defendable, measurable, solution in a transparent manner.
Any questions regarding this report may be addressed to Scott McKenzie, Director of
CarmelNatur, at www.carmelnatur.org.
Respectfully Submitted,
c__~%1/(G--:..__
/Scott McKenzie
VIEWS
I REACHES I ,\V ENIJES I \VATER I ENERGY I FOOD

www .c ~o rnw l n;~tu r .nrg I B31 -2ll-137(>
7
FRIENDLY FIRES ON CARMEL BEACH: VOICE OF THE

PEOPLE
11 /1 7/2014
"My husband and I have been coming to Carmel since childhood. We have always enjoyed
fires on the beach with parents and family. As adults, we enjoyed fires with our children (and
now our grandchildren). That's the first th ing the grandchildren want to do when they arrive.
We feel it's a family event and enjoyed by everyone. We do not feel any side effects from the
smoke. We live full time on Scenic Road, between 11th and 12th, so we are right in the center
of w here the fires are typically burning. At night, we enjoy seeing the flames and knowing that
fam ilies are having fun . We have checked on litter after holidays. Yes, the garbage cans are
full , but the beach is mostly clear. Our entire family would hate to see any of this change. We
think it's wonderful that Carmel-by-the-Sea is the only beach in the USA that allows unlimited
fires. If we stop fires, what would be next? No more dogs off lease?"
-Bill and Mary Lou Shellooe of Scenic Avenue, Carmel By-The-Sea
CARMEL BEACH COMMISSION SERVING SPECIAL

INTERESTS?
12/2/2014
A statement made by Commissioner Kathy Bang in an email sent from a personal email
address appears to indicate that she, and others, are serving the interests of a select group of
people. The statement in question is:
"While we have spared you all the need to come to various meetings up till now, we
expect a large number of folks who support the status quo to be present to make a case to do
nothing."
This appears to indicate that multiple members of the Beach Commission, one of which is
Commissioner Bang, are dedicated to serving a select group of people (to the extent that the
group wouldn't be required to be present at regular meetings of the Commission in order for
their voices to be heard). You can download the email below. Personal email addresses of
the recipients have been redacted for their protection.
Print
https://us-mg205 .mail.yahoo.com/neollaunch? .partner=sbc&.ra ...
Subject:
Fwd: Upcoming Public Hearing, December 4th, 5:30PM
From:
kathleen bang (kathybang@me.com)
To:
Date:
Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:14 PM
>>Hi all. I wanted to let you know that on December 4th at 5:30PM, there will be a public hearing
on the issue of beach fires.
>>
>>THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT TIME FOR ALL VOICES TO BE HEARD.
>>
> > !W
~h
:-1:.le
-:-_
w
_e_,h
,-a
_v
_e_s_p_ar
_e
_d
..,..y_
o_
u_
a-:-:
ll:-t-:he_n_
e_
ed
~to_
c_
o_
m_e_t_
o_v
_an
---=o
_u_s_m
_ e-e t-:-in_g_s_u_p---:ti-:-:ll:-n-o-w
--.,lwe expect large
numbers of folks who support the status quo to be present to to make a case to do nothing. Therefore,
if you believe we should move forward with our plans to manage the issues related to beach fires, that
will be the time to come and express your views.
>>
>>If you cannot come, please write a letter expressing your views Sharon Friedrichsen, who,
although she has changed duties, will be continuing with her staffing of this effort. Or you could
write to the new City Administrator, Doug Schmitz.
>>
>> At the meeting , we will present the work that has been done to date, including all the groups we
have met with and consulted with, as well as three alternatives, all of which meet the 2 guiding
principles set out by city council: get the fires off the sand (as has been done in every other public
beach in the state) and limit the number of fires (we are the last beach with unlimited numbers)
>>
>>In the course of our work we consulted with the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control
District (MBUAPCD) as well as the Coastal Commission. We will have the Director of the
MBUAPCD present to speak on the hazards of wood smoke and other environmental issues.
>>
>> I would be very happy to speak with any of you about this in greater detail if you are interested.
This is a critical step in our process. Following the public hearing, we hope to make our final
recommendation to the Forest and Beach Commission on December 11. This may continue to the
January meeting, but then we hope to pass our recommendations on to Planning and City Council
shortly thereafter. It would be our hope that a solution could be in place by the next summer fire
season.
>>
>>Thanks.
1 of2
11/17/14 , 4:IOPM
https:l/us-mg205 .mai1.yahoo.com/neo/launch? .partner=sbc&.ra ...
Print
>>
>>Kathy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
2 of2
11117114,4:10 PM
CARMEL BEACH FIRES: PUBLIC HEARING

THURSDAY!
12/2/2014
There will be a public hearing on proposed changes to the Carmel Beach Fire Regulations. The
meeting will be held at City Hall on Thursday, December 4th, at 5:30pm.
If you are concerned at all about maintaining you r option to have a beach fire with family and friends
whenever you want, you'll need to show up and make your voice heard.
The Forest and Beach Commission has already convinced the Ca rmel City Council that li miting the
number of fires will be part of the solution. What that means to you is that if you get to the beach and
the prescribed number of fires has already been permitted for that day, you and yours wi ll be in the
dark.
There is also a big push by certain commission members to install sem i-permanent fire rings in the
sand . My concerns with that are that these rings will be in the sand during daylight hours, taking up
spots that would normally be used for sport, like throwing a football or a Frisbee. Tripping on one of
these fire pits would be quite painful. Also, from the rec trail , these fire pits will appear as smoke stacks
scattered about the sand. Not pretty.
CarmeiNatur has proposed (what we feel is) a very reasonable solution that doesn't req uire limiting the
number of fires on the beach. At the same time, it keeps the ash and charcoal out of the sand. It also
doesn't introduce unsightly trip hazards onto the beach. Combine this proposal with low-smoke fue ls,
and you have. a winning solution for the public.
See the proposal here:
http://www.carmelnatur.org/uploads/1 /6/1 /6/16162844/carmelnatur pilot proposal 20140622. pdf
BEACH FIRE FAQS

12/4/2014
Why isn't it reasonable to compare what we do on Carmel Beach with what other beach
towns do?
The Beach Commission is content to justify restricting your beach fire liberties by comparing
how we are "one of 38 out of 435 beaches in California that allows fires". They also are quick
to note that "No public beach in California allows an unlimited number of fires."
Except us, of course.
But if we apply that logic to another issue, the ridiculousness is readily apparent. What if we
used it to allow business owners to install neon lights to promote their stores? After all, a large
majority of communities allow neon lights. Shouldn't we follow suit?
The right thing to do is LEAD, not follow. We can increase air quality and have pristine white
sands, without limiting the number of fires or turning away families that may have traveled
great distances to enjoy a night under the stars, sitting around a bonfire.
Why is it disingenuous for the Beach Commission to claim the City Council is
responsible for imposing two "Guiding Principles" on their decision-making process?
The Beach Commission requested that the City Council adopt two restrictions to the solution
space for the beach fire issue. They did this BEFORE THEY RESEARCHED THE PROBLEM.
I can't think of any logical reason, in any problem-solving situation, for imposing, up front,
artificial restrictions to possible solutions. One illogical reason might be that it was the intent of
the Beach Commission to restrict fire liberties, regardless of any possible solutions that would
not require such restrictions. Is that progress? No. Is it the City Council's fault? No.
Now, the Beach Commission presents a "One Year Pilot to Achieve Guiding Principles," when
they should have been creating a pilot to "Increase Air and Sand Quality".
Why are semi-permanent fire pits a bad idea?
1. They are safety hazards. These pits will be in the paths of running children. Why must we
endanger children when a solution exists that doesn't require endangering children?
2. They are not attractive. Visitors and residents will find the natural beauty of Carmel Beach
now dotted with black circles of ash and charcoal.
3. They will become repositories for trash . Human nature ensures this, and the city won't be
able to enforce proper usage.
4. We won't be able to count on the city properly maintaining these pits. Observe how long
graffiti stays on the bluff before the city removes it and you'll understand the severity of this
problem .
Is forcing beach-goers to invest in portable propane fire pits in keeping with the Coastal
Commission's mandate for "affordable beach access?"
No.
Is it fair for the government to put citizens in competition with each other for a limited
number of fire pits?
No.
Did the Beach Commission follow a logical, defensible, problem-solving process?
No. Find out details here.

Is there a possible solution that wouldn't require the city to limit the number of fires?
Yes . Read about it here.
CARMEL BEACH COMM ISS ION VOTES 3-2 FOR NEW

FIRE PROCEDURES
12/12/2014
Last night, the Forest and Beach Commission voted 3-2 to recommend a new one-year pilot project to
"Achieve Guiding Principles". (Yes, it is as nebulous as it sounds.) In a strange twist of events,
Commissioner Kathy Bang, the architect of the Pilot, voted against it (along with Commissioner Karen
Ferlito). How that happened would be a great comedic play, if it wasn't so indicative of a completely
dysfunctional and delusional Ad Hoc Committee that was entrusted with such a large part of our Carmel
Community.
Who's driving this train, anyway?
The Ad Hoc Committee is officially comprised of Commissioner Bang and Commissioner Michael
Carte r, but I have a sneaking suspicion that it's really a Bang-Ferlito duo. I say this because, in all the
meetings I've attended (Workshops, Ad Hoc Committee briefings, and regularly-scheduled Forest an d
Beach Commission meetings,) I've heard barely two words from Carter. When he did speak, he asked
the Cultural Activities representative what the rules on the beach were. Personal observations of
talking points, mannerisms, and the voting records of Bang and Ferl ito also support my theory.
What in the he ck are "Guiding Principles"?
Exactly. Guiding Principles are what you create up-front, so you can solidify your agenda and avoid
solving the real problems. In this case, Commissioner Bang was able to convince the Forest and
Beach Commission to recommend that, whatever the solution: 1) the number of beach fires would be
limited , and that 2) no fires will directly touch the sand. Ultimately, the City Council adopted these
principles , and they were stitched into Bang's flag ... the one she loves to wave in every meeting .
As a result, to be successful, all Bang had to do was devise a system that achieved these two
principles. What about maintaining unlimited fire opportunities for the public? What about maintaining
the natural state of the beach? What about public safety? It was apparently very easy for Bang to
sacrifice public enjoyment, the natural beauty of Carmel Beach , and safety for "cleaner air and cleaner
sand", even though these things aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.
By the way, CarmeiNatur offered a proposal in June that incorporates public enjoyment, natural beauty,
and safety. Read it here, but you should know it was disregarded by the Ad Hoc Committee and the
Forest and Beach Commission as a whole.
"Ad Hoc" is apropos.
To say that the decision process of the Ad Hoc Committee was both disorganized and incomplete
would be a fantastic understatement. While this author spent considerable time and effort attempting to
insti ll a modicum of rigor into their decision process (documented here and here,) what occurred was ...
well. .. Case in point: After seven months of work, the committee produced a one-page
recommendation entitled "One Year Pilot to Achieve Guiding Princi ples". (I'd create a link to it for you,
but it has been removed from the City Website. I'm assuming that's because it's being "refined".)
Anyway, the gist of the Pilot Program is to:

1) Install 26 semi-permanent fire rings in the sand . These will be the only authorized locations for wood
fires.
a) Firepits will only be available in the summer months (as yet undefined).
b) Firepits will be first-come , first-served. No permits.
2) If you are one of the unfortunate families to arrive at the beach after all pits are taken, you're out of
luck. Unless ... you own a portable propane fire pit. There will be no restrictions on the number of
those . They're about $100. In the winter months, only propane fires will be allowed.
Karma
Here's the "it would be funny if it weren't so damn important" part. After all the "ad hoc" work,
ostensibly in the name of cleaner sand and cleaner air, the pilot proposal didn't even
address barbecues. Barbecues, another beach favorite enjoyed by many a beach-goer, do tend to dirty
the sand and the air. So, why wasn't it considered? Because "Guiding Principles". Because "Ad
Hoc". Because "Personal Agenda". Because "Special Interests". Because "Lack of Transparency".
Here's the kicker: At the time the pilot proposal came up for a vote, Commissioner Jeff Baron and
Chairman David Refuerzo were under the impression that barbecues would still be allowed. The shock
on their faces ... but honestly, it was embarrassing to watch the incompetency of the Ad Hoc Committee
unfold. I had to leave.
But what about our barbecues?
I found out today that it was decided last night to recommend that five (5) permits for barbecues be
made available daily at the police station . If you have a fire pit, you can have a barbecue in it without a
permit, but if you don't, you'll need to hustle up to the police desk and get yourself a permit (if they
haven't already been let out).
Seven months to work on a good solution , and a major portion of it is cobbled together in 15
minutes. Not the procedural rigor I expect from my City Government.
Anyway ... apparently the Bang-Ferlito duo didn't like all those "extra barbecues", so they voted against
the motion. Ironically, they had an opportunity to shape the solution, but their myopia and their
preconceived notions didn't allow them to see it.
What's next?
City Staff Member Sharon Friedrichsen is working on the language. The proposal will be vetted by the
Coastal Commission and the Planning Office before it goes to the City Council.
CARMEL BEACH FIRES: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

12/13/2014
Now that the Carmel Forest and Beach Commission's Ad Hoc Committee has made their
proposal, it is possible to compare it against other proposals. This shou ld have been done at
the Beach Fire workshop on December 4th, however, only the Ad Hoc Committee's proposal
was discussed. At the very least, this should have been done in committee by the Forest and
Beach Commission before they voted on Thursday evening. It was not. Perhaps it will serve
to inform the City Council during their deliberations, and before they enact regulation.
The table below is a comparison of Ad Hoc Committee Proposal and the CarmeiNatur
Proposal. Comparison is made within 5 major categories of requirements: Safety, Enjoyability,
Avai lability, Nature, and Cost to Taxpayers. Sub-requirements within categories are desired to
either be maximized or minimized.
g
Requlremem
Supportlnc ltequlrtiM.flt
i:t
j ;
ElqJian01tlon
8~
z E
~a
'0'
Air quality
.(). Trip hazards
.0.
Rtqui~ pttvslc:~l ~eniOn
Enjoy.bllity
Procu~ Ccmpltllity
'0'
Sense of Freedom
hJ. C.rmeiN.Jitur will ~ure qu.JIIily fuel!$ ~Md. Ad Hex: 5ol~;,~tio!'l ~li6 on
alm~tfed ~o~mtnt f01 that,
e 5emiPermancnt fire ringS ate trip h;uatds. c:armelN'atur proposes
ponable flrepits that will
each night.
e OumeiNiltur proposes a catered flre". Set up and tear di)Wn performed
bv profe$$lonals. Firfl. will be off the beach at lOpm .
e
carmeiNatur proposes a "catered fire. Wood artd/or Pf(lt)an.e fi-re pits
8 provided and malftt;~ ined by Pf~slonal~.
e e Cam1etN01tur professiOnals on h;md to eJqllain protbs. Ad Hoc- solution
~~moved
requires wfitte.n rules to be studied and mtmariled.

CllrmefNatur professfonals on h1nd to eMPialn Pf~. Ad Hoc. .solution
re-Quire$ wrlttc11 rvlcs to be st\ldted and m~ized .
Ad ttoc lO!ution ~..,;~, beachf,oer to brint wood to beach. n6 have
P'opa.ne fire plt on hand u a bldalp.
CarmefNatur proposes unlimited fn opportunltig, in locations chosen by
be~goers (wiehln limits). Ad Hoc restricts numbe-r <tnd loc.atiOfl.
ee
Time required f c:c~mpl.,nce Ad HQc 5olutlon require$ ~rs to stake out a seml-pe~~T~anent '~
rv.. brine wood/propa~ 1t. C.rmeiNJtur requlrn none of \bat.
C."meiNatur proposes oolimlted fire CJC)poi'Wtlltles. in !ocalioM d'l~n by
.f Frunration
btad'laoers (withit~ limits). Ad HOc rMtticts n~nnbef and locatiOfl.
Enforcement Requi~n~ e e Cam'leiNiltur controls execucion throuth "catffed fi~ PfO!SS. Ad Hoc
solution requires rostly/disruptift polldnc effort..
f. Government ln\cMfttiofl
OlrmeiN.itur Jntrols execution thrgup (.ttelf!d fin: p~ocess. Ad Hoc
~ requlra to~Stl'f/~Pt~ pollt:lnc effort.
e
Car~tur prQ90ses unlimited fire CJC)portunlties..ln locations c:ho\sen b1
AvallilbiJity
btachaoers (within limits). Ad HOc restriets numtw and locatio~\.
Neumf for both solutions. Ad Hoc: solution requires bf:.<lch&e>ers to
PtlfcNSC woodfprop~ne kft. CarmelHatur provides !NitKiels/sefYict- for
fee.
Nature
't Natural ap~W;arante of beam
Ad Hoc solutiOn installs dirty, semi-permanent flm tiftC$. cat'IMINatur
proposes portable firepits that will be remO'ftd uch nlpt.
Clean Sand
Both $Oiutlon5. result in dean $<Ind.
... Char~lln ~nd
~ 50MloM reduce~ In~... Ash in Silnd
e e Both sofutions reduce ash in sand.
Ad Hoc soiL.rtlon proposes s.ernl-f)ennanent fifePIU, wbi('h wiLl be used as
.tJ. Trash In sand
tr.sh recept.des cklrlnt the day. C.rmetNatur proposes I)OfUble- flr~l~
Nt wiD be- remowd Ndl nfcht.
4 Man-made appurtenances
Ad Hoc solution in$UI8 dirty, ~mi-pefmaM!'It fit~ tinl$. QfflttfNatut
proposes portable twepits that will be mnoved eadl night.
4 Sfgnage
Ad Hac solutlon will require a long list of rules pasted on oomerous ~ns.
CarmeiNatur soiL.rtion requite$ one rule: "Ccnt4Jtt CarmeiN.nur tor flreM
Ad Hoc solution still requires bt-athloers to bfinJ wood, whiCh is typrcallv
Damaae to the banll:
tfwown ewer bank. carmeiNatur provides a "cate~ fire", and
professional~ can monitor bluff and redooe tr.~ffic.
canntiNatur Pf'Qfesslonals will pia~ liteS 25 ft from ~ walls. and IYI>Onitor
Damage to ~a walfi
public for Craffiti. M Hot solution requfres costlfJIMs~
e:nforeement.
QlrmeiNatur enR~ra QU.illl\y fvef ~used. M Hoc solutlon req1,1&u
f Smoke
~e enfOI'cement.. C.tmtiNaM fl~p!t5 will be effldeot tomb~tlon

r~uc~. Ad Hoc: solution uws open fires .
Graffiti
<:armtiNatur p;oftssionals will monitor public fot &nffitl. Ad HOC soluilon
n !quiffi aKtlyftHs-effective enforc.rntent.
Cost to Taxpayers .0. Tax burden
CarmeiNatur requires ci\y talrpayers to $Ubsidtze atl fi~ activity.

CC!rmeiNatur shifts cost to beachgoers that have fires.
ee
ee
ee
ee
ee
ee
.e.
ee
.e.
CARMEL BEACH FIRES: THE PUBLIC SPEAKS OUT

12/16/2014
There is a change.org petition out there for those that want to maintain beach fire procedures
as they are now. Also, they are calling for a public vote on this issue. Makes sense, because
cu rrently the Fo rest and Beach Commission action is being driven by a small number of
elites.
As of today, over 124 people have signed it. Below are the comments that were posted along
with those signatures.
What we're seeing is that th ere is a significant continge nt of people that want to maintain their
beach fire opportunities.
Read on to discover the will of the public:
"Just a friendly reminder that city council members are elected to further the interests of their
electors, not themselves. I'll be watching ."
Peter Patneaude
Alamogordo, NM
"Save the beach bonfires! Save a little bit of the 'Old Carmel'."
Linda Hudder
Bend, OR
"Some of the best times of my life were during bonfires on Carmel Beach. Please keep them !"
Garret Kurteff
Berkeley, CA
"The value of the memories I have with my friends at our bonfires is beyond words. This is a
right that shouldn't be taken away. The beaches have always been kept clean regardless of
how many bonfi res are out. Th is aspect of beach uncleanliness is a nonissue and an attempt
by a minority of the popu lation to impose their will on the majority. And even if this is an issue ,
there are better ways to tackle it."
Les Girard
Berkeley, CA
"I grew up in Carmel. Beach fires are a grea t thing on cold/cool nights in Carmel. They create
an ambiance that is integral to Carmel. Keep the warmth ... keep this great part of Carmel
Beach"
Kindra Ericksen
Bonsall, CA
"A public vote is important."
Scott McKenzie
Carmel, CA
"They should leave it alone. You would think the city would have more important things to do."
Brandon Gesicki
Carmel, CA
"I grew up in Carmel, this is the sort of thing that keeps us different from every other town in
America. Please keep the bonfires burning in Carmel, not much else is the same from my
childhood. "
Chantal Corbat
Carmel, CA
"Growing up, bonfires were some of the greatest memories I have with my friends. In a small
town, the beach was a place for kids to be able to gather, hang out, and build memories along
the most gorgeous coast line I have ever seen"
Taylor Mikel
Carmel, CA
"We like it just the way it is!"
Lana Richards
Carmel, CA
"The beach bonfires are safe and an important part of the culture on Carmel Beach"
Avery Yeatman
Carmel, CA
"I'm signing because as a 20-something, the bonfires on the beach with friends are the best
times I spend here. They have to stay!"
Steph Cardinalli
Carmel, CA
"A public vote is the right thing to do."
Scott McKenzie
Carmel, CA
"Keep beach bonfires"
Cynthia Petrick
Carmel, CA
"Nothing wrong with having Bon Fires at the beach as long as one follows the rules!"
Sylvia Stewart
Carmel, CA
"Because I have enjoyed having bonfires here for many years now and th ere is no substantial
reason to get rid of them. "
Megan Bomar
Carmel, CA
"I regularly have beach bonfires .. .if there is a need for better education , fine. If there is a need
for better signage, fine. But the fire police and the thought of having this fantastic activity
changed for no real reason at all is just plain sad and wrong."
Bruce Dormody
Carmel, CA
"Bonfires are our most special memories of Carmel, for generations"
Tara Ryan
Carmel, CA
"I resent Carmel's government by the unidentified few and their attack on local culture
including bonfires, live music, nightlife. I'll specu late that they are the ones who created the
problems fo r Henry Miller Library."
Carl Maxey
Carmel, CA
"Bonfires on the beach have been amended over the years. What we still enjoy should be left
intact. "
Sidolitta Mateo
Carmel, CA
"Our family has enjoyed so many beach parties on the Carmel beach . Beach fires and s'mores
are an integral part of them."
Susan Masters
Carmel, CA
"BONFIRES ARE APART OF CARMEL and its culture, for not just the young folk, but
everyone! To take them away would be so wrong."
Leighanne Vittetoe
Carmel, CA
"I LOVE bon fires on Carmel Beach and have since the early 80's! It's a major part of the
charm of Camels Beach. What's next? A leash law? Or even worse, no dogs allowed on the
beach?"
Lori Buffington
Carmel Valley, CA
"I'm signing this because everyone should enjoy bonfires in such a beautifu l area."
Brianna Harris
Del Monte Forest, CA
"I 'm moving back to my home the Monterey peninsula and have long dreamed of the day I can
again enjoy a bonfire on Carmel beach ...this time with my husband who has never
experienced the beautiful Carmel coast in this magical way."
Susan Barrett
East Garrison, CA
"I'm signing because I believe it is truly up to the city populous to decide."
Emet Blood
Fairfield, lA
"Grew up in Carmel and it has and always will be my favorite memories and favorite thing to go
home to. It makes Carmel beach special "
Jordan Cowan
Fort Collins, CO
"Been enjoying fires on Carmel beach all my 60 years!"
Lizz Jensen
King City, CA
"Carmel is my home town and the memories of fires on the beach are some of my most
treasured. I want very much for my children, and grandchildren, to share in that beautiful
experience .
We still have my father's Pebble Beach home. It is a sanctuary for family members and having
dinner on the beach with a bonfire is a family tradition."
David Speck
Long Beach, CA
"My friends, from out of town, will make a day of it. They w ill visit, shop , have lunch, dinner
and go to the bonfire on Carmel Beach. It has been a Carmel tradition for decades. Please,
do not change it. Thank you. "
Rosemary Kakudo
Marina, CA
"Bonfires have been a wonderful tradition on Carmel Beach for as long as I can remember.
The rules work fine as they are. I haven't heard any arguments in favor of banning the bonfires
so how and why has this even come up?"
Margaret Foreman
Meadow Vista, CA
"I Believe They Should Keep The Bonfires Going Since Monterey Banned Them."
S.B.
Monterey, CA
"For all of my life I've always enjoyed bonfires on the beach with my fam ily- it wou ld be shame
to have it changed due to some b.s. jargon and selfish reasons. Time for people to step up to
the plate. "
Mike Steelman
Monterey, CA
"It's a very special tradition and the best way to enjoy Carmel beach . "
Michelle Maddox
Monterey, CA
"Please keep the Carmel beach bonfires! It's such a wonderful thing to share with friends and
family."
Abigail Kehr
Monterey, CA
"I loved growing up celebrating holidays and family get-togethers with Carmel Beach bonfires."
Sue Quinn
Morgan Hill, CA
"I grew up in Carmel and now visit my mother every other month. Let the residents decide how
beach fires should be handled ."
Jeff Guzaitis
Oakland, CA
"I 've experienced bin fires on Carmel beach since 1969. Let me continue the Carmel legacy by
enjoying Carmel beach bon fires with my kids and future grandchildren."
Mark Ryan
Pacific Grove, CA
"I'm signing this because I am sick of an elite few making decisions for thousands of us hard
working citizens of this community who have roots here and deserve the few natural and
inexpensive pastimes in this area to be PRESERVED."
Anna Fobin
Pacific Grove, CA
"Really enjoy ha ving a place to go with family and friends. We love nature and take care of it
when we visit. Don't want to see it change but I think people can be educated to keep it clean
too!"
Suzi Lebon
Pacific Grove, CA
"I have grown up at Carmel Beach and believe the locals should decide its fate ... not the
millionaire "fair weather" residents."
Kat Banks
Salinas, CA
"I love beach bonfires."
Ken Lagudas
Salinas, CA
"I w as born and raised in Carmel and bean bonfires were a big part of my childhood there . "
Robert Faulkner
San Diego, CA
"Bonfires on Carmel beach were a wonderful part of my youth and I want others to also be able
to enjoy that experience."
Caitlin Smith
Saratoga, CA
"As a former Carmel resident but still residing in the area , bonfires on Carmel Beach have
always been a fun way to get together with friends and family. I would like to keep this great
activity available for all of us today and for those to come."
Nathan Mandurrago
Seaside, CA
"I believe that in taking away the bonfires it would be just taking away from the city. My family
(3 daughters) ages 6, 10 and 18 enjoy having bonfires at the Carmel beach!!! Please don't
take away this special outing my family and I enjoy doing!!!"
Jennie Infante
Seaside, CA
"Keep the tradition alive, we love our bonfires!"
Linda Rawlings
Seaside, CA
"Best day ever 60th communal CHS class of 1972 in Oct 2014 ... keep Carmel magical!"
Alba Arboleda
Surrey, BC
"My great uncle was George Sterling. I lived in Monterey for two years and plan on living there
when I get out of college."
Jacob Curran
Woodbridge, VA
Presentation from January 21, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting
+-'
Q)
+-'
0>
(.9
c
-c
::J
0
()
2014 Council key initi~tiv~-~ --lifllMII

Plan, Focus on beaeh ~~
The existi
competi. ''"'.AY~
the pu
-c
:1
E
E
0
0
.s::.
en
co
'.....,
"'0
c:
Q)
en
en
:J
.!Q
~co
~
.....,
ro
ro
en
rn
ro
(/)(..)
::J
(.9
'<(
~
.....,
en
co 0

CD
tn
-.....>
(.)
.....CD
.c
FBC
Recomm~
Locations/Devices
26 "Off-the-shelf' fire wood
Secured with chain in the sH~
Proposed Locations
10th
Cove
1081-11th
I
11th
Cove
11th-12th '
12...
Cove
12th-13th
13th
t
Cove
13tii.:. .
Santa ~
./ Lucia
,
Q)
-IL
.c
-
tn
tn
c..
CD
E
E
0
(.)
Cl)
0::
0
u.
~
.....
Q)
.c
E
c
"'0
Q)
(.)
.I::.
ro
.c
.I::.
l.()
(])
c
ro
c.
0
L.
a..
...
><
(I)
z
M
"E
co
~
::J
L.
..0
Q)
U!..
(.)
--.........
C)
+-'
+-'
-c::
E
L.
::J
0...
Q)
(.)

Beach Fire Management Pilot Program 02-03-15

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Beach Fire Management Pilot Program 02-03-15

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Consideration of recommendations related to a beach fire

Wood-burning fires must be contained within a fire containment device

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

Agenda Item: 8.C

Wood-burning fires must be contained within a fire containment device

2 fire rings near the staircase at 10th

Agenda Item: 8.C

Agenda Item: 8.C

Agenda Item: 8.C

Budgeted (yes/no) Cleaning ($25,000) and

Funding Source (general fund,

Fire Devices (26 @$1,000 each)

Agenda Item: 8.C

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION/DECISION HISTORY:

Council included beach fire management as part of Shoreline Management Plan

1. Supplemental staff report by Chief Calhoun

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Douglas J. Schmitz, City Administrator

Michael Calhoun, Director of Public Safety

Supplemental - Receive report and authorize funding of one Police

Authorize the funding.

Agenda Item: 8.C

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Funding Source( general fund, grant,

Public Safety #74010- Salaries

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION/DECISION HISTORY:

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

CARMEL BEACH/ PARK PATROL OFFICER:

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

rorest ana ljeacn LommiSSion u ecemoer .u , LUl4 UKAr 1 minutes

Agenda Item: 8.C

t-orest ana tseacn Lomm1ss1on uecemoer 11, LU14 UKAt-1 mmures

Agenda Item: 8.C

t-oresr ana l:jeacn Lomm1ss1on uecemoer 11, LU14 UKAt-1 mmures

Carter, Baron, Refuerzo

REPORTS FROM STAFF AND COMMISSIONERS

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

January 28, 2015

It provides coastal recreational access to fires, albeit small ones of a

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

With all respect,

Forest and Beach Commissioner

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

City Council Meeting February 3, 2015

Agenda Item: 8.C

Presentations from December 4, 2014 Forest and Beach Commission Workshop