Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
36
Abstract
CS.1
CS.2
CS.3
CS.4
CS.5
CS.6
CS.7
CS.8
4.710
4.65
1. INTRODUCTION
4.50 4.500
4.50
4.000
4.00
4.00
3.500
3.50
3.50
3.000
3.00
3.00
2.500
2.50
2.50
2.000
2.00
2.00
1.50
1.500
1.50
1.000
1.00
1.00
0.50
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Distance (m)
After beach fill
Fig. 1.
07 DESEMBER 2009
12 Agustus 2010
IJENS
2. EQUILIBRIUM
PROFILE
SAND
BEACH
Ru
HB
nf
2.5
Ru/H
Trend for Smooth slope and impermeabe
(after Losada, Gimenez Curto, 1981)l
1.5
0.5
0
0
Fig. 3.
Ir
Ru
= for < 2.3 (1)
H
Fig 3 shown that at = 0 to = 2.5 there is an
Area of Study
H, T
37
n1
m1
n2
m2
DWL + Ru + F
Wave Run Up
DWL
1: m
1: n
Sand Fill
IJENS
Sand
Diameter
mm.
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
Protected Beach
n
25 40
12 20
7 12
6 - 10
m
6 - 10
6 - 10
6 - 10
6 - 10
Unprotected Beach
(Open)
n
m
40 100
10 15
20 40
10 15
12 20
10 15
10 - 15
10 15
3. Experimental Set-Up
Beach
slope
model
1:n
Wave damper
38
Wave
generat
or
Circula
tion /
Drain
Stroke /
Variatio
n
20 m
Fig. 3.
30
Solitary
Wave
Cnoidal
Wave
Stockes
Wave
Stable Profile
y= 10, y=15 dan y=20
Initial Profile
Stable Profile y=10; y=15 & y=20
SWL
First Breaking Waves
Process of Breaking Waves
25
Hi/h
20
15
0.1
10
Airy
Shallow Water
Airy
Intermediate depth
Airy
Deep water
0
60
0.01
0.01
Fig. 6.
0.1
h/Li
10
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
IJENS
240
12
16
18
T (dt)
Hi
H0
(m)
(m)
nf 1
nf 2
nf total
0.6
0.030
0.0310
5.45
6.95
6.52
1.0
0.014
0.0155
4.77
3.78
4.38
1.5
0.012
0.0121
5.91
7.08
6.83
2.0
0.009
0.0085
8.04
8.49
8.24
2.5
0.009
0.0078
6.59
12.73
9.71
3.0
0.011
0.0079
8.96
8.67
8.84
3.5
0.007
0.0052
12.45
12.08
12.22
4.0
0.006
0.0038
6.45
14.81
11.01
1.0
0.033
0.0355
4.13
7.54
6.26
1.5
0.031
0.0309
4.00
3.48
3.86
2.0
0.020
0.0180
7.40
6.23
6.80
2.5
0.017
0.0138
5.67
10.59
7.80
3.0
0.022
0.0167
5.65
9.09
7.18
3.5
0.018
0.0126
5.71
8.46
6.90
4.0
0.014
0.0090
5.89
7.09
6.32
0.9
0.055
0.0598
4.55
12.20
8.23
1.0
0.055
0.0601
3.90
14.19
7.04
1.5
0.034
0.0336
3.99
3.31
3.72
2.0
0.035
0.0317
5.24
5.32
5.28
2.5
0.025
0.0202
5.60
10.26
6.67
3.0
0.029
0.0218
6.18
11.52
7.55
3.5
0.024
0.0166
6.67
9.81
7.71
4.0
0.018
0.0122
5.68
6.47
6.06
39
H
H0
= 0,07 0
L0
d50
1 / 5
(2.)
Slope
0.01
0.10
1.00
0.01
0.1
Ho/T
10
Nayak (1970)
Ramah and Eorattupuzho (1973)
Thompson (1976)
Data Exp. nf1
IJENS
0.10000
H0/L0
0.00100
0.0
0.1
1.0
Slope (tan)
40
10.0
0.00010
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Miche (1944) had also studied the stable
slope profile in the area of run up run down. The
comparation result between this study and both
Miche (1944) and Larson (1988) shown a similar
trend. The graph of Miche (1944) present the stable
slope of 0.1 tan 1 or slope nf1 = 6.6 to nf1 =
3.3, with 0.001 <H0/L0< 0.1. This study exhibited
the stable slope of 0.1 tan 0.3 or slope nf1 =
10 to n = 3.3, with 0.001 <H0/L0< 0.01. Moreover, at
H0/L0> 0.02 and H0/L0 < 0.01, stable slope with a
bar and berm were formed, respectively.
5. CONCLUSIONS
1. The result of 2D physical modeling analysis
shown the occurance of stable slope profile. The
steeper the wave would created the flatter slope.
The slope of artificial sand beach was influenced
by the wave steepness and the sand
characteristics. The higher the sand density , the
steeper the beach slope.
2. The corelation between slope (nf1) and non
dimentional parameter of Ho/T in this study
ranged from nf1 = 3 12 and Ho/T = 0,02 5,00,
respectively. The measurement of field data such
as wave height (H) and wave period (T) must be
converted to non dimentional parameter , in order
to utilize this study result. However, if the field
measurement values fall outside the range of this
study result then, the value from other study can
be utilized.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
IJENS
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
41
IJENS