Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Because effects from N-G voltage can range from nonexistent to significant, you
must learn to identify true common-mode events
Feb 1, 2007Tom Shaughnessy, PowerCET | Electrical Construction and Maintenance
Power quality questions continue to revolve around one underlying issue related to
electronic equipment: its ability to withstand the effects of electrical interference. If
equipment sensitivity was always well known and defined, then we would have few,
if any, doubts. In this perfect world, we would also know with a high degree of
certainty that a voltage sag of a known amplitude and duration would have either
no effect or a significant impact on equipment. Unfortunately, we seldom are privy
to such information. Therefore, the possible effects of neutral-to-ground (N-G)
voltage are often left up in the air.
When you measure N-G voltage, the measurement yields a simple voltage
differential, which a voltage potential on either the neutral conductor or grounding
conductor may create. Furthermore, this differential may be a simple by-product of
neutral return current or may even be part of a complex common-mode voltage
signal. The effects of these conditions vary greatly.
The simple question What is the effect of N-G voltage? isn't so simple
because it depends upon the magnitude, mode of propagation, timing,
energy/frequency content, and sensitivity of the equipment involved. Let's try to
resolve this important and confusing question.
<b>Fig. 1.</b> Basic single-phase circuit and load. As the load draws current, a voltage drop develops
across the supply and return conductors. N-G voltage measurements at the load will reflect the voltage
drop across the return (neutral) conductor.
Figure 2 shows the basic diagram of a power supply system. What possible effect
could neutral return losses have upon a system with this configuration? After all,
there are no ground-referenced components on the input to the power supply that a
voltage potential on the neutral conductor could upset. In fact, UL power supply
tests reverse the polarity of voltages applied to a power supply. Consequently, the
power supply must withstand 120V with respect to earth/ground for both normal
and reverse polarities.
The voltage sensing and feedback circuitry also must meet electrical isolation
requirements for safety purposes. The bond between the grounding of the system
and the electronics occurs on the secondary of the high-frequency transformer
inside the power supply or system. If the system is well designed, the effects of lowfrequency voltage potentials appearing on the neutral conductor should have no
adverse effects. In fact, if a power supply has a switched input capability (e.g.,
85VAC to 264VAC), how could any simple N-G potential cause a problem? For
example, suppose the power supply operates from a 208VAC source. Then each
conductor on the input (L1 and L2) will have a 120V potential with respect to
ground.
A more common problem develops when the power supply and circuit
boards are floated (no intentional connection to chassis), but the device has RS-232
circuitry with internal referencing to ground. Earth/ground-referenced offset
potentials may then cause erratic data transfer. Also, large common-mode
potentials can degrade or damage the chip. The latter problem appears more
frequently at printers and ancillary equipment.
While the industry has focused much attention on power frequency voltages
measured with a voltmeter and involving N-G voltages, a much larger problem
arises when you consider higher frequency N-G voltages that require measurement
with better instrumentation. This poses realistic performance challenges for
electronic equipment.
<b>Fig. 3.</b> Example of true common-mode interference recorded with a power monitor.
<b>Fig. 4.</b> True common-mode interference affecting system networks. This signal drives
interference currents through the Ethernet and associated intersystem cabling systems.
If the staff was to measure only from neutral to ground, then the true commonmode nature of these signals would not be apparent. For instance, referring back to
Fig. 1, the impedance of the neutral conductor will support impulse propagation as
loads cycle on and off. The resulting transient voltages, however, are developed
from a relatively high impedance. Therefore, their potential to wreak havoc is
limited. In comparison, common-mode interference signals, as shown in Figs. 3 and
4, not only have more available paths through the system, but their energy and
frequency content may be higher.
<b>Fig. 5.</b> Ground current induced voltage. Current surging through the grounding system of a
facility caused this event.
waveform exceeded the input range of the digital storage oscilloscope. However,
you can follow the slope of the lines and extrapolate that the peak voltage easily
reached and probably exceeded 100V! This event caused hard drive failures and
data loss.
N-G voltages less than 3V and developed at power frequencies seldom cause
adverse effects.
Low level N-G transients less than 25V peak and caused by load cycling
usually donot cause adverse effects. However, the potential for adverse effect
will increase as frequency content and amplitude increases.
Higher frequency, true common-mode events can cause adverse effects, but
you may not be able to detect or correctly identify their presence.