CIDECT 1 - CHS Joint Under Static Loading PDF

Construction with Hollow Steel Sections - Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly
static loading
Discuss me ...
DE8OBW BUUDE
Created on 24 May 2008

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Steelbiz Licence Agreement
FOR CIRCULAR HOLLOWSECTION (CHS) JOINTS

UNDER PREDOMINANTLY STATIC LOADING
Construction with Hollow Steel Sections - Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly static loading
Discuss me ...

CONSTRUCTION
WITH HOLLOW STEEL
SECTION
Edited by: Comite International pour le Developpement et I'Etude

de laConstruction Tubulaire
Authors: Jaap Wardenier, Delft University of Technology
Yoshiaki Kurobane, Kumamoto University
Jeffrey A. Packer, University of Toronto
Dipak Dutta, Chairman Technical Commission of Cidect
Noel Yeomans, Chairman Cidect Joint and Fatigue Working Group

Discuss me ...
FOR CIRCULAR HOLLOW

SECTION (CHS JOINTS
UNDER PRED MINANTLY
STATIC LOADING
Jaap Wardenier, Yoshiaki Kurobane, Jeffrey A. Packer,

Dipak Dutta, Noel Yeomans
Verlag TUV Rheinland

Discuss me ...
CIP-Titelaufnahme der DeutschenBibliothek

Design guidefor circular hollow section(CHS)
joints under predominantly static loading
I
[ed. by: Comite Internationalpour le Developpement
et IEtude de la Construction Tubulaire]. Jaap
Wardenier . . . Koln : Verl. TUV Rheinland, 1991
(Construction withhollow steel sections)
ISBN 3-88585-975-0
NE: Wardenier,Jaap; Comite Internationalpour le
Developpement etIEtude de la Construction
Tubulaire; For circular hollow section (CHS) joints
ISBN 3-88585-975-0
0 by Verlag TUV Rheinland GmbH, Koln 1991

Entirely made by: Verlag TUVRheinland GmbH, Koln
Printed inGermany 1991

Discuss me ...
The necessity to solve the design problems concerning the versatile applicationsof hollow
sections, which are somewhat supplementary to the general structural engineering with
plates and open sections and apply particularly to this youngest member
in the familyof steel
sections, led to the foundation of CIDECT in 1962 as an international organization of major
hollow section manufacturers. The aim is to combine together all the resources worldwide
fromindustry,universitiesandothernationalandinternationalbodiesforresearchand
application of technical data, development of simple design and calculation methods and
dissemination of the resultsof the researches by publications.
Since its inception CIDECTactivities have been focussed virtually
on
all aspects of the hollow
section design including buckling behaviour
of empty and concrete-filled columns,
static and
fatiguestrength of joints, aerodynamicproperties,corrosionresistanceandworkshop
fabrication. The results of the researches sponsored by CIDECT are availablein extensive
reports and monographs and have been incorporated into many national and international
design recommendations e. g. DIN (Deutsche lndustrie Normung - German Standard), NF
(NormeFrancaise - FrenchStandard), BS (British Standard),ACNOWCSA(Canadian
Standard),AIJ(Architectural Institute of Japan),IIW(International Institute of Welding),
EUROCODE 3 (draft) etc. This design guide forthe design and calculationof circular hollow
section jointsin steel structures under predominantly static load is first
the of a series, which
CIDECT has planned to publish in the near future. Four further design manuals are now in
preparation:
- Design guide for circular and rectangular hollow section joints under fatigue loading
- Structural stability of hollow sections.
Design guide for rectangular hollow section joints under predominantly static loading
- Design guide for hollow section columns susceptible fire
to
The design of the connections in welded latticed structures of structural hollow sections
requiresnotonlytheknowledgeaboutproperweldingbutalsospecialinsightintothe
connection behaviour mainly dependent on the connection configuration governed by the
geometricalparameters. In ordertosecurethestructuralintegrity
of ahollowsection
connection, it is of vital importance thatthe dimensions of the constructional members
as well
as the configurationof the connection resultin adequate deformation and rotation capacity.
It
was necessary to carry out extensive experimental investigations besides theoretical analysis
tocometotheproperunderstanding
of thesolution.Simpledesignformulaeand
constructional rules have been derived from these technical data obtained by the analytical
and experimental research works.
The intentionof this design guide
is to communicate to the architects, structural engineers and
constructors these simplified design methods with worked-out examplesin order to enable
themtoconstructatechnicallysecureandeconomicsteelstructure
in circularhollow
sections.
We wish to express our hearty thanks to three
of the outstanding personalitiesin the field of
- Professor J. Wardenier of DelftUniversity of
research of hollowsectionstructures
Technology, The Netherlands, Professor Y. Kurobane of Kumamoto University, Japan and
Professor J. A. Packer of University of Toronto, Canada, who kindly consented to participate
in writing this guide.
Further, our thanks go to
all CIDECT member firms, who made
this design guide possible.
Dipak Dutta
Chairman of the Technical Commission
of CIDECT

Discuss me ...
Discuss me ...

Contents
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Design of tubular
structures
.......................................
10
.....................................................
Introduction
2.1
2.2
Designprocedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10
11
Fabrication of tubular
structures
Joint
design
under
predominantly
static
loading
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.6.1
4.6.2
4.6.3
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
Joints in uni-planar trusses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
Joints in multi-planar structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
Joints under moment loading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32
Interaction between axial loading and bending moments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Special types of uni-planar joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36
Otherconfigurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36
. .
Plate type jotnts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38
Flattened and cropped end bracing joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40
Bolted
connections
Worked
out
design
examples
...................................
......................
...............................................
13
16
42
......................................
46
a) Uni-planar
truss
................................................
b) Arch-formedtruss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...............................................
c) Vierendeel
truss
..................................
6.2
Multi-planar
truss
(triangular
girder)
................................
6.3Trusswithsemi-flattenedendbracings
6.4Effectivebucklinglength
of trussmembers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.5
Boltedconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
52
52
55
59
59
60
Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
CIDECT International Committee for

the Development and Studyof Tubular
Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
66
6.1

Discuss me ...
Lift shaft with glass hQusessupported by tubular lattice frames
Discuss me ...
General

Many examplesin nature demonstrate the excellent properties

of the circular hollow section
as a structural element in resisting compression, tension, bending and torsion. Further, the
circular hollow section has proved to be the best shape for elements subjected to wind-,
orwaveloading.Thecircularhollowsectioncombinesthesecharacteristicswithan
architecturally attractive shape. Structures madeof hollow sections have a smaller surface
area than comparable structures of open sections. This,in combination with the absenceof
sharp corners, resultsin a better performanceof corrosion protection.
These excellent properties should result
light
in open designs with a small number
of simple
joints in which gussets or stiffening plates can often be eliminated. Since
joint
thestrength is
influenced by thegeometricalproperties of themembers,optimumdesigncanonlybe
obtained if the designer understands the joint behaviour and takes it into account in the
conceptual design. Although at present the unit material
of hollow
cost
sectionsis higher than
that of open sections, this can be compensated by the lower weight of the construction,
smallerpaintingareaforcorrosionprotectionandreductionoffabricationcost
by the
application of simple joints without stiffening elements. Many existing constructions
in hollow
sectionsshowthattubularstructurescaneconomicallycompetewithdesigns
in open
sections.
Over thelast twenty five years CIDECT hasinitiated many research programmes
in the field of
tubularstructures:e. g. in the field of stability, fire protection,windloading,composite
construction, and the static and fatigue behaviour
joints.
of The resultsof these investigations
areavailable in extensivereportsandhavebeenincorporatedintomanynationaland
international design recommendations with background information
in CIDECT Monographs.
Initially many of theseresearchprogrammeswereacombination
of experimentaland
analytical research. Nowadays many problems can be solved
in a numerical way and the use
of the computer opens up new possibilities for developing the understanding of structural
behaviour. It is important that the designer understands this behaviour and is aware of the
influence of various parameters on structural performance.
This practical design guide shows how tubular structures under predominantly static loading
should be designed
in an optimum way, taking account
of the various influencing factors. This
guide concentrates on the ultimate
limit states design of lattice girders or trusses. Joint
resistance formulae are given and also presented
in a graphical format, to give the designer a
quick insight during conceptual design.
The graphical format also allows
aquick check of computer calculations afterwards. The basic
design rules for uni-planar joints
(Fig. 8 ) satisfy the safety procedures e.g. used in the
European Community andin Canada. The formulae for other typesof joints are in a certain
way related to those for the basic types
of joints.

Discuss me ...
Design of tubular structures
2.1
introduction
In designing tubular structuresit is important that the designer considers the

joint bahaviour
right from the beginning. Designing members e. g. of a girder based on member loads only
may result in undesirable stiffening of joints afterwards. This does not mean that the joints
have to be designed in detail at the conceptual design phase. It only means that chord and
bracing members have to be chosen
in such a way that the main governingjoint parameters
(Fig. 7) such as diameter ratio d,/do, thickness ratio to/t,, chord diameter to thickness ratio
joint
dolto,gap g between bracings, overlap0, of bracings and angle4,provide an adequate
strength and an economical fabrication.
Since the design is always
a compromise between various requirements, such
as static
strength, stability, economy in fabrication and maintenance, which are sometimes
in conflict
with each other,the designer should be awareof the implications of a particular choice.
The following guidance is given to arrive at optimum design:
- Lattice structures can usually be designed assuming
pin jointed members. Secondary
if the
bending moments due tothe actual joint stiffness can be neglected for static design
if the joint parameters are within
joints have sufficient rotation capacity. This
will be the case
the range recommended in this design guide.
- It is common practice to design the members with the centre lines noding. However, for
ease of fabrication it is sometimes required to have a certain noding eccentricity. If this
eccentricity is kept within the limits -0.55 5 e/do I0.25 indicated in Fig. 1 the resulting
bending moments can be neglected for
joint design and for chord members loaded
in
tension.
Chord members loaded in compression, however, have always to be checked for the
bending effects of noding eccentricity (i.e. designed as beam-columns, with all of the
moment due to noding eccentricity distributed to the chord sections).
Full overlapping results in an eccentricity e = -0.55 do but provides a more straight
forward fabrication thanpartial overlap joints anda better girder behaviour than gap
joints.
cl partsal overlap jwnt w l t h negatlve eccentrlclty

Tellwetre Uberlappung mlt negatlver
dl total overlap joint wtth negatlve eccentrlclty

Volle Uberlappung mlt negatlver Exrentrlz~tal
Exrentrlritdr
e/O
e<O
Fig. 1 - Noding eccentricity
Secondary bending moments due to the end fixities of the members can be generally
omittedwithrespecttodesign
of bothmembersandconnections,providedthere
is
adequate deformation and rotation capacity
in both members and connections. This
can be
10
Discuss me ...
achieved by limiting the wall slenderness

of certain members, particularly the compression
bracing members, which is the basis for some
of the geometric limits of validity shown in
Fig. 8 .
Gap joints are preferred to partial overlap joints (Figs. 1C and 2) since the fabrication is
easier with regard to end cutting,
fitting and welding. However, fully overlapped joints
joints.
(Fig. 1 D) provide betterjoint strength with similar fabrication than gap
of the
connecting face
of the
The gap g is defined as the distance measured along the
length
chord, between the toes
of the adjacent bracing member (ignoring welds). The percentage
overlapping
overlap O,,defined in Fig. 2, is such that the dimension p pertains to the
bracing.
2 t, g+ t, so that the welds
In good designs a minimum gap should be provided such that
do not overlap each other; on the other hand,
in overlap joints the overlap should be at least
0, 2 25%.

0,
overlap = % x
100~"
Fig. 2 - Gap and overlap
- In common lattice structures, (e.g. trusses), about 50%

of the material weight is used for the
chords in compression, roughly 30% for the chordin tension and about20% for the web
members or bracings. This means that with respect to material weight, the chords
in
compression should likely be optimised to result in thin walled sections. However, for
corrosion protection (painting) the outer surface area should be minimized. Furthermore
joint strengthincreaseswithdecreasingchorddiametertothickness
ratio dolto and
increasing chord thickness to bracing thickness
ratio to/t,.As a result thefinal diameter to
thickness ratio doltofor the chord in compression will be a compromise between joint
strength and buckling strength
of the member and relatively stocky sections
will usually be
chosen. For the chordin tension the diameter to thickness
ratio doltoshould be chosen to
be as small as possible.
- Since thejoint strength efficiency(i. e. joint strength divided by the bracing yield A,
load
. fyl)
increases with increasing chord to bracing thickness
to/t,,this ratio should be chosen to be
as high as possible.
Furthermore the weld volume required for a thin walled bracing is smaller than thatof a
thick walled bracing with the same cross section.
- Since the joint strength also depends on the yield stress of the chord, the use of higher
strength steel for chords (when available and practical) may offer economical
possibilities.
2.2
Designprocedure
The design of tubular structures should be approached in the following way to obtain an
efficient and economical structure:
- Determine structure or truss geometry keeping the number
of joints to a minimum.
- Determine member forces assuming pinned joints and noding centre
lines.
- Determine chord member sizes considering axial loading, corrosion protection and joint
geometry (usual dolt, ratios are 20 to 30). Usually an effective buckling length
of 0.9 times
11
Discuss me ...

the system length is assumed if supports in-planeand out-of-plane are availablethe

at joints
Il61.
The use of high strength steel (fy = 355 Nlmm) for the chords should be considered.The
delivery time ofthe required sections has to be checked.
Determine bracing member sizes, (based on axial loading), preferably with thicknesses
smaller than the chord thickness.
The effective length for the bracings can be assumed conservatively to be0.75 times the
system tength 116,32,33). A more precise calculation method for the effective length is
given in chapter 6.4.
Standardize the bracing members to a few selected dimensions (or even two) to minimize
the number of the sectionsizesfor the structure. Due to aestheticreasononeouter
diameter with differentiated wall thicknesses may be preferred.
Check joint geometry with regard to eccentricity limits and fabrication.
Check joint efficiency with the diagrams given in chapter 4. From afabrication point of view
gap joints are preferred to overlap joints.
If the joint strengths are not adequate, changethe bracing or chord dimensions. Only a few
joints will normally require to be checked.
Check the effects of eccentricity nodingmoments(ifany)on
the chordmembers,by
checking the moment-axial force interaction.
If required, checktruss deflections, at the unfactored load level, by analyzing the truss as a
pin-connectedframe if it hasnodingnon-overlappedjoints.If
joints areoverlapped
throughout, check the truss deflection by assuming continuous chord members and pinended bracing members taking account of the eccentricity.
12
Discuss me ...
Fabrication of Tubular Structures
In designing tubular structuresthe designer should keep in mind that the costs of the structure
are significantly influenced by the fabrication costs. This means thatcutting, end preparation
and welding costs should be minimized.
- Taking account of the standard mill lengths in design may reduce theendtoend
connections of chords.For large projects it maybeagreed that special lengths are
delivered.
The end profile cutting of tubular members which have to fit other tubular members, as
shown in Fig. 5 , is normally done byautomatic flame cutting (see Fig. 3).However, if such
equipment is not available especially for small sized tubular members, other methods do
exist, such assingle, double or triple plane cuttings as shownin Fig. 4 [ l , 4, 241.

Fig. 3 - Automatic flame cutting
In a tubular joint, fillet welds, full penetration butt welds or filletlbutt welds are applied
depending on the geometry as shown in Fig. 5 . When welds are used, these have to be
designed on the basis of the strength of the member to be connected. They haveto be
considered as automatically prequalified for any member load.
The weld atthe toe of the bracing is most important. If the bracing angle is less than 60,
the toeshould always bebevelled and a butt weld usedas shown in Fig. 5-C2.
To allow proper welding
at the heel of the bracing the bracing angle should not beless than
300.
Since the welding volume is proportionalto t2 thin
walled bracings can generallly be welded
more economically thanthick walled bracings.
A minimum gap limit oft, + t, is recommended forK and N joints to ensure that adequate
space is available to enable welding at the bracing toes to be performed satisfactorily.
13
Discuss me ...
Sizes of CHS bracings which can

be fitted to CHS main members with a single cut; do must be
equal to or greater than0.08 d: + 3 (with d, in mm)

diameter
of main
size of bracing (d,)

up toand including:
straight cut
do
(mm)
33,7
42,4
48.3
60.3
76.1
88.9
114.3
139.7
168.3
193.7
219.1
323.9
355.6
406.4
457.0
508.0
CHS dia. dl
(mm)
26.9
26.9
26.9
33.7
33.7
42.4
48.3
48.3
60.3
60.3
60.3
60.3
76.1
wenn
(all dimensions are in mm)
Fig. 4 - Single, double or triple plane cuttings
n ,
Detall A
Fig. 5 - Weld details
14
Delall E
Detall C l
Detall C 2
Detall D
Discuss me ...

From a fabrication point of view gap joints are preferred to overlap joints not only because
the cutting and endpreparation are easierbut also becauseof tolerances andinspection.
- In partially overlappedjoints the toe ofthe overlapped member(hidden part) is usually not
welded.
If the bracing load componentsperpendicular to the chord wall are rather unbalanced (e. g.
exceed a factor of 1.5) it isrecommended thatthe most heavilyloaded member is the through
bracing with its fullcircumference being welded to the chord, that means also
the hidden part
has to be welded.
cropping (A)
angedruckt IAI
full flattening (B.C 1

voll abgeflacht (B, Cl
partial flattening ID1

teilweire abgeflacht (D)
Fig. 6 - Various typesof flattening
Especially for small sized tubular structures, or in those cases wherethe fabricator does not
have proper equipment for end
profile cutting(partial), flattening of the ends of members can
be used as shown in Fig. 6.More detailed information regarding fabrication is given in refs.
[ l , 4, 261.
Transparent roof with tubular trusses and columns for a Tropic Bush Garden
15
Discuss me ...
Joint design under predominantly static loading
4.1
introduction
All joint design strength formulae given in this guide are developed in ultimate limit state
terms. This means that
the effect of the characteristic loadsQ, multiplied by appropriate load
factors ys should not exceedthe joint design strength N*,i.e.
effect yS . Q,
Nk
N*
where N' = Ym
If the allowable load

(or allowable stress) method
is used, thejoint design strengths should be
divided by the load factoryS applicable, i. e.
N*
Nk
effect Q, S - = _ _
Ys
Ys' Ym
In this case yS = 1.5 is recommended.

The chord, bracing and
joint symbols generally used are indicated
in Fig. 7 for uni-planar joints
and are definedin chapter 7.
chord rymboir
GurtBezelchnungen
bracing and jolnt symbols

Fullstab und Knoten-Berefchnung
K-type jolnt
K-Knoten
T-type p n t
T~Knoten
N type joint
N-Knoten
X - t y p e jolnt (91 = 90. c r o s s ~ o ~ n t )

X-Knoten 191 = 90 Kreuzknotenl
Fig. 7 - Chord, bracing andjoint symbols
16
KT-pnt
KT- Knatrn

Discuss me ...
Roof structure for an automobile exhibition hall
17
Discuss me ...
The joint design strength formulae incorporating the effect of the value of Y,,,are given in
tables as well as in diagrams [l l]. The formulae given in Fig. 8 can be used for computer
calculations whereas the diagrams of Figs. 9 to 12 are very helpful in design and for a quick
check of computer calculations.
In the diagrams the joint strength is expressed in terms of the efficiency of the connected
bracings, i.e. the joint strength for axially loaded joints N* is divided by the yield load Ai fyi of
the connected bracing.
This results in efficiency formulae of the following type:

(4.1.l)
The efficiency parameter C, is given for each type of joint in diagrams as a function of the
diameter ratio p and the chord diameterlthickness ratio dolto.
The valueof the parameter C, in theformula above gives the efficiency for the bracing of a
joint with a tensile prestress loading in the chord f (n') = 1.O, a bracing angle gi = 90 and the
same wall thickness and design yield stress for chord and bracing.
From the efficiency equation it can be easily observed that yield stress and thickness ratio
between chord and bracing are extremely important for an efficient material use of the
bracing. Decreasingthe angle li increases the efficiency. The function f (n') dependson the
chord loading (f (n') S 1.O for compression prestressing). The efficiency formula shows
directly that the folowing measures are favourable for the joint efficiency:
higher strength steel for chords than for the bracings (fyo> fyi)
- bracingwall thickness as small as possible (ti < to) but such that the limits for local buckling
or interaction are satisfied, see chapter 4.2.
angle ai > 90; hence, prefer K-joints to N-joints.
For momentloading the design formulae are shown in Fig. 19. The respective design charts
are given in the Figs. 20 and 21.In these charts the jointefficiency is based onthe plastic yield
moment capacity MP,, ofthe bracings. Here the same rules apply for an efficient design as
those mentioned for axially loaded joints.
Tubular triangulartrusses for a highway tax paying station
18
Discuss me ...

4.2
Joints in uni-planar trusses
Typical uni-planar joints are

illustrated in Fig. 7. The most recent design recommendations for
uni-planar T-,X- and K-joints are givenin Fig. 8. These formulae habe also been adopted by
the International Institute of Welding [2] and by the Eurocode3 Drafting Committee [S]. Most
of these formulae are based on the basic formulae
originally developed by Kurobane (9,
lo].
Thedesignformulaefor
T-, Y- andX-jointshavebeenbasedonthestrengthunder
compression loading but can also be used for tensile loading. The ultimate resistance under
tensile loading is usually higher than under compressive loading, however, it is not always
possible to take advantage of this strength due to large deformations or due to premature
cracking. The strengthof other typesof joint configurations not givenin Fig. 8 can be related
to these basic typesas will be shown in section 4.6.
i. e. plastification of the chord cross
The design strength
is generally governed by two criteria,
section and chord punching shear. In order to design
a joint, both criteria have to be checked
in terms
according to the formulae
in Fig. 8. These design strengths are presented graphically
of bracingefficiency in Figs. 9 to 12. These figures show punching
that
shear (horizontal
cut off
of the curves) only becomes
critical for joints with thick chords (low dolt, ratio), and generaly
in combination with low p ratio. The horizontal cut off for punching shear in Figs. 9 to 12 is
conservative if the bracing angle 0 < 90.
The most common types of T- and X-joints are those with 90 angle between bracing and
chord axes. The graphs and the examples show that T- and X-joints are less efficient than K
joints, especially for high doltoratios. However, these types of joints are less important in
common tubular structures.
K- and N-joints are
the common types
of joints used in tubular structures. Figs. 11 and 12 show
four design diagrams i.e. with gaps
of 2t0, 6t0, lot, respectively and with overlap. The effect
of the gap or overlap is also shown in Fig. 13. It can be observed that overlapping of the
bracings is especially efficient forthin walled chords.
As shown in fig. 11, for the designof gap K-joints aninitial value C, = 0.3 can be usedas a
design basis forp ratios of 0.4 to1.O, doltoratios of 20 to 30 anda relative gap glt,of 4 to 10.
To minimize the numberof joints and to allow good welding,
a bracing angle0 of about 40'
will be efficient. For tension loaded chords withf (n') = 1.O, and with 0, = 40, the bracing
can be fully effective if toltl is larger than about 2.0. If the chords are made of steel with a
higher yield stress than that
of the bracings the thickness
ratio may need to be even lower,
i.e.
(4.2.7)
The design charts 1, 2 and 4 (Figs. 9, 10 and12) show the function f (n'). It should be noted
here that only the prestress
of the chord has to be considered; the
thus
horizontal bracing load
components have to be extracted,
as shown in fig. 14.
For lattice girders which are simply supported
at the endsof the span, the prestressing
is small
at the girder ends where the bracing loads are highest and the prestressing
high where
is
the
bracing loads are low(in the centre).
For continuous lattice girders the effectof f (n') needs special attentionat the supports.
K-, N- and KT-joints with external cross chord loading
(e.g. through purlin loads), can be
calculated using the criteria for K-joints by checking the larger normal component
of the
bracing force. If, however, all the bracing loads act either
in tension or in compression (in the
same sense) orif only one bracing is load bearing, the
joint should be checkedas an X-joint
(see also Fig. 24c).
The KT-type and other types are dealt with
in chapter 4.6.
To avoid interactionbetween bracing local buckling and joint strength is
it recommended [25]
to limit the joint strength efficiencies by the compression bracing for high bracing diameter to
wall thickness ratiosd,lt,.
19
Discuss me ...
Type of joint
Y-joints
T- and
Design strength(i = 1 , 2)
chord plastification
f ' t;
N; = % . (2.8+ 14.2p2).yo.2.f(n')
sln el
(eq. 4.2.1)

X-joints
(eq. 4.2.2)
K and N gap or overlapjoints
(eq. 4.2.3)
N.-
2-
sin B ,
''W
N'
general
(eq. 4.2.4)
punching shear
punching chear checkfor T, Y, X and

K, N, KT joints with gap
(eq. 4.2.5)
functions
f(n') = 1
+ 0.3n' - 0.3n"for
n' < 0
(compression)
ranges
dl
0.2<-
d0
51.0
(see Fig. 13)

(eq. 4.2.6)
validity
di
- 525
2t,
300 S
e, S 900
e
- 0.55I-
d0
Fig. 8 - Design recommendationsfor uni-planar joints
20
y 5 25
0.25
20 (X-joints)
o v 2 25%
g t 1, + tp
Discuss me ...
Design chart 1 Tubular joints
T- and Y-joints of circular hollow sections

ranges of validity
symbols
0.25 p 5 1 . 0
dl
- 550

tl
fYi 5 355 N h m 2 30' 5 Bi 5 90'
fop = chord stress as a result of additional axial

force or bending moment
welds are to be dimensioned on the yield

strength ofbracing
the
Efficiency of T- and Y-joints
.-
0.7
0.6
15
0.5
0.4
'
30
0.3
1 -
40
50
0.2
0.1
o r
0
0.2
I
I
0.4
0.6
iI
I
0.8
t
1.0
-P
Fig. 9 - Design chart for T- and Y-joints of circular hollow sections
21
Discuss me ...
Function f (n)
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7

E 0.6
c
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
-0.8
-1.0
-0.6
n
-0.4
-0.2
for n 1 0 : f (n) = 1
fur n z O : f (n)= 1
calculation example
chord: Ca 219.1 x 10.0
bracing: 0 168.3 x 4.5
f,
= f,,;
el = 900
dolt, = 21.9
dl/tl = 37.4
fop
168.3
0 = d,ldo = - = 0.77 f(n)
21 9.1
219
dolto= - = 21.9
10
Ni
A1
f,,
- 0.48 fyo
= 0.79
C, = 0.35
sine, = 1.0
10
4.5
= 0.35. - 0 . 7 9 = 0.61
Fig. 9 - contd. - Design chartfor T- and Y-joints of circular hollow sections
22
Discuss me ...
Design chart 2 Tubular joints
X-joints of circular hollow sections

ranges of validity
symbols
0.2 5 p 5 1 .o
do
- 140
to

,f 5 355 Nlmm2 30'
6,s90'

strength of the bracing
Efficiency of X-joints
1 .o
dolt0
0.9
10
0.8
0.7
0.6
15
0.5
20
0.4
0.3
30
40
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 .o
-P
Fig. 10 - Design chart for X-joints of circular hollow sections
23
Discuss me ...

Function f (n')
-1.0
-0.6
-0:8
-0.4
n'
-0.2
for n'2O: f (n') = 1

fiir n'>O: f (n') = 1
calculation example
chord: 0 219.1 x 10.0
bracing: 0 168.3 x 5.6
= fyl;
,,f
e,
= goo
d,/t,
= 21.9
dl/tl = 30.0
fop =
- 0.48,,f
6 =d,ld -~
168.3 = 0.77 f(n') = 0.79
- 219.1
C, = 0.26
dolt, =
N;
A1
. fy,
219
= 21.9
10
10
5.6
sine, = 1.O
= 0.26 . - 0.79 = 0.37
Fig. 10 - contd. - Design chart for X-joints of circular hollow sections
24

Discuss me ...

Discuss me ...
Efficiency K- and N-gapwith g
Efficiency K- and N-gap withg
10
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
10
0.5
0.4
15
0.3
20
0.2
30
40
50
0.1
0
0.2
Fig. 11 - contd.
26
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 .o
dildo
- Design chart for K- and N-joints with gap of circular hollow sections
Discuss me ...
calculation example
chord (0):0 219.1 x 10.0 (compr.) dolto = 21.9
bracing (1): 0 139.7 x 6.3 (compr.) dl/tl = 22.2
bracing (2): 0 114.5 x 5.0 (tension) d,/t, = 22.9
,,f = ,f = fy2; fop = - 0.3fY0; 8, = e, = 40'; g = 85 mm
139.7
p = dl/d - - = 0.64 f(n') = 0.88
- 219.1
g' = 8.5,by interpolation: C, = 0.33
219
sin el = 0.643
dolto = - = 21.9
10
10
1
Ni
= 0.33 . - . - .0.88= 0.72
0.643
6.3
A1 . $1
N2*
A, .,,f
N;
A,
. fy2
sine,
sine,
= 1.10>1.0
N;

Fig. 11 - contd. - Design chart for K- and N-joints with gap of circular hollow sections
Design chart 4 Tubular ioints
K- and N-overlap joints of circular hollow sections

symbols
ranges
- of validity
d,
0.25- 51.0
d0
,f
I355
OV
Ida

N/mm2
> 25%
e
- 0.55 I
I0.25 300
d0
goo

strength of the bracing
definition gap
calculation example
chord (0):0219.1 x 10.0 (compr.) do/to = 21.9
bracing (1): 0 139.7 x 6.3 (compr.) d,/t, = 22.2
bracing (2): 0 114.5 x 5.0 (tension) d,/t, = 22.9
e, = e, = 40; 50% < OV 100%;
fyo = ,f =;,,f
fop = - 0.3fyO;
139.7
p = d,/d = 0.64 f(n') = 0.88
-219.1
C, = 0.33
219
= 21.9
sine, = 0.643
dolto =
10
Ni
10
1
= 0.44. - .
.0.88= 0.95
A1 ' fy1
6.3 0.643
e,
I _C
9
ov = P
'
100%
N;
A,
. fv2
sine,
A,
. fV2 sine,
= 1.46 > 1.O
Fig. 12 - Design chart for K- and N-overlap joints of circular hollow sections (see next page for
f (n') diagrams)
C,- and
27
Discuss me ...
Efficiency K- and N-overlap joints

1 .o
Y
0.9
10
15

0.4
20
30
0.3
40
50
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.o
dl/d,
Function f (n')
-1.0
-0.6
-0.8
-0.4
n'
-0.2
Fig. 12 - contd. - Design chart for K- and N-overlap joints of circular hollow sections
28
Discuss me ...
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
-m
-i
r
2.0

1.5
Fig. 13 - Gap, overlapinfluencefunction
overlap
Uberlappung
gap
Spalt
chordpreload =
No,
NO
Fig. 14 - Prestressingof the

chord
n'=N o = N I c05e1 + N z c o s B zN+O P
d, /tl limits for which the joint

efficiencies derived
from Figs. 8 to 12
can always be used
*-
N;
A, . fy,
No,
A0
.fyo
efficiency limit'
for compression bracing
values given in the table.
As a formula these efficiency limits can be expressed by:

(4.2.8)
Considering member buckling the above mentioned limitations will not frequently be critical.
29
Discuss me ...

Braced tubular column support
4.3
Joints in multi-planar structures
Multi-planar joints are frequently used in tubular structures e. g. in towers, offshore jacket
structures, triangular or quadrangular girders, etc.
Design rules covering the multi-planareffects are given only
in [l
7) However, the multi-planar
effects in 117) have been on
elastic considerations and have not
yet been checkedsufficiently
against the actual plastic behaviour of joints. For design, however, some guidelines can be
given.
One can imagine that the multi-planar effects are most substantial for double X-joints as
shown in Fig. 15. Finite element calculations [l81 have shown thatmulti-planar loading hasa
substantial influence on the strength and stiffness as compared to a uni-planar X-joint.In the
case where the loads
acting in one plane have the same magnitude as those
in the other plane,
but with an
opposite sense (e. g. comression vs. tension),joint
thestrength may drop by about
1/3 compared to the uni-planar joint (see Fig. 17).
On the other hand, for loadings with the same
thesense
joint strength increases considerably.
However, this increase in strength may be accompanied by a reduction in deformation and
rotation capacity. A conservative assumption for the time being will be to adopt the same
percentage increasein strength for loads in the same senseas the percentagereduction for
opposite loads.
30
Discuss me ...
bracing 0 399-10
chord 0 1006-25
bracing 0 599-10
chord 0 1006-25
Results f o r p = 0.4
Ergebnirse f u r p = 0.4
P = dlD = 0.4
l
I F1
7000
6000 F1
5000 4000
3000 -
Knotenl (Re
Knoten3
Jo1nt5
r__
F1

,
20
Knoten B
30
40 50
deflection (mm)
Verrchiebung (mm\
10
Rerultsforp = 0.6
Ergebnme f u r b = 0.6
I
--
Joint 6
Knoten
F2=
Knoten 7
2030
' ,'
1000
Knoten 4
Joint4
Joint2 (ref.)
Knoten2
IRef.l/
I---Jolnt9
Knoten 9
,/
O
10
20
30
40
50
deflectlon (mm)
Verschlebung (mm)
M)
Fig. 15 - Multi-planar X-joints
For K-joints in triangular girders as shown in Fig. 16, various tests have been carried out by
Although an interaction equation
is established in [20],
this function can easily
be
Makino [20].
replaced by a constant of 0.9, to be applied to the strength of uni-planar joints.
deflected shape at failure

Form nach Versagen
Fig. 16 - Multi-planar K-joints
31
Discuss me ...
For T-joints, tests have beencarried out only on double

T-joints (V-joints) witha 90' included
angle betweenbracings and both bracingsloaded in compression (Fig. 17). Compared the
to
strength of uni-planar jointsthe multi-planarjoint strength didnot varysubstantially,although
the stiffness increased
considerably [ 19).
Based on the available evidence it is recommended to design multi-planar joints using the
formulae for uni-planarjoints with the correction factors as given in Fig. 17.
____
Type of joint
correction factor to uni-planar

joint (limits according to Fig. 8)
60 5 4
I9
0'

1 .o
+ 0.33-NZ
NI
Note: take account of the sign of

NZand N, (N, 2 NZ)
KK
0.9
Fig. 17 - Correction factors for multi-planar joints
4.4
Joints under moment loading
One should distinguish betweenprimarybendingmomentsdueto

noding eccentricities
(Fig. 1) needed for
the equilibrium with
the external loading and secondary bending moments
due to end fixities of the joint members as a result of induced deformations in the structural
system. The secondary moments are in principle not needed for the equilibrium with the
external loading e.g. the secondary moments in membersof lattice girders. As already
influence theloadbearing
mentioned in chapter 4.2, thesesecondarymomentsdonot
capacity of lattice girders if the joints have sufficient deformation capacity, i.e. within the
parameter limits of the formulae given inFig. 8.
The momentsdue to noding eccentricitylattice
in girders may be assumed to be taken by the
chord members.
Joints predominantly loaded by in-plane bending moments are generally of the T-type and
called Vierendeel joints (Fig. 18). Thesejoints also exist in framed structures.
Fig. 18 - Uni-planar Vierendeel joints
32
Discuss me ...
Out-of-plane bending moments are not very common in uni-planar structures. This type of
loading generally appears more frequently
in multi-planar structures.
The joint design strength for joints loaded by bending can also be used for other
joint
configurations such as K-, N- and KT-joints[5].
Design strength
Type of joint

Ml'p = 4.85,,f
.t g .
P dl
'
T.Y.X.K.N.
. fJnJ
(4.4.1)
MOD
(4.4.2)
General
(4.4.3)
punching shear check

for dl 5 do - 2 . l,
(4.4.4)
Same range of validity as for

axially loaded joints, see Fig. 8
f(n') = 1 + 0.3n' - 0.3 n'*

f(n') = 1
for n' S 1.0

for n' 2 1.O
(4.4.5)
(4.4.6)
n' = foplfyo
Fig. 19 - Design recommendations for joints loaded by primary bending moments
For punching shear the plastic shear moment capacity

is given, however, the angle function
is
based on an elastic approach.
In a similar manner to axially loaded
joints, these formulae are presented as efficiency design
charts (Figs. 20 and 21). The
joint efficiency Cipbor Cop, gives the joint moment design
W,, . fy, of the bracing. The horizontalcut
strength divided by the plastic moment capacity
off line givesthelimitationbasedonpunchingshear(plasticpunchingshearmoment
capacity).
Thesediagramsshowthat
in mostcasesthein-planebendingmomentresistanceis
considerably better than that for out-of-plane bending.
It should benoted that the joint rotational stiffnessC (moment per radian) may considerably
influence the moment distribution in statically indeterminate structural systems, e. g. portal
frames and Vierendeel trusses. rigid
If connections are required
it is recommended to choose
a p ratio near 1.O or low doltoratios in combination with high to/tlratios.
Figs. 22 and
23 give a graphical presentation
of the rotationaljoint stiffness of T-joints
[21] for
in-plane and out-of-plane bending moments.
33

Discuss me ...
dollo
Fig. 20 - Design diagram for joints loaded by in-plane bending moments
15
dolt0
20
25
i
~
-+
30
40
50
t
.
'
~ ' 1 1 1 , ) 1 /
0.1
00
011
0.'4
0,'s
0.3
0.2
0'6
017
Ole 0;.
1.0
-P
Fig. 21 - Design diagram for joints loaded by out-of-plnae bending moments
-+
1
0
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.8
l 0
-P
Fig. 22 -Joint stiffness for in-plane bending

bending
of T-joints
34
-P
Fig. 23 - Joint
stiffness for out-of-plane
of T-joints
Discuss me ...
4.5
Interaction between axial loading and bending moments
Especially in three dimensional structures the joints may be loaded bycombinations of axial
loading and bending moments.
Several investigations have been carried out to study this problem and as a result many
interaction'formulae exist. All investigations have shown that in-plane bending is less
severe than out-of-plane bendingand a reasonable simplified lower bound interaction
function is given by [16]:
(4.5.1)
in which:

Ni, Mi, and M, are the loads acting, and N; M; and M:, are the design strengths.
It should be noted that the joint stiffnesses given in Figs.22and23
can be affected
considerably by the presence of axial loading [22]; however not sufficient test evidence is
available for a more precise recommendation.
Triangular girder (85 m length) for the support of a roof.
35
Discuss me ...
4.6
4.6.1
Special types of uni-planar joints

Otherconfigurations
In tubular structures various other

joint configurations exist which have not been dealt in
with
the previous chapters. However,the strength of several typesof joints can be directly related
to the basic types dealt with
in chapter 4.2.
Fig. 24 shows some special typesof joints with tubular bracings directly welded to the tubular
chord.
~
Relationship with the formulae in Fig. 8
Type of joint
a

N, 5 N;
N; from X-joint
(eq. 4.6.1 . l )
b
N,
. sine, + N,. sin0,
(eq. 4.6.1.2)
(N; from K-joint)
(eq. 4.6.1.3)
5 N;. sine,
NZ. sin 0, 5 N; . sin 0,

d ld l
replace - by
d0
strength formula
N, . sine,
d2
d3
In K-joint
3 do
+ NZ. sine,
N? sine,
where N.: sin0, is the larger of N;
N, 5 N;
NZ S N;
(eq. 4.6.1.4)
(N, from X-joint)
. sine, and N;. sine,
(K-joint)
(K-joint)
check cross section 1-1 for plastic shear capacity

(gap joints only)
Fig. 24 -Other configurationsof uni-planar tubular joints
36

Discuss me ...
Arch-formed trusses fora sport hall
Fish-shaped trussesfor an ice-skating hall
37
Discuss me ...
4.6.2
Plate type joints
Various joint configurations arepossible for joints with gusset plates. The design
strength of
these joints is mainly based on tests
carried out in Japan [5,9].In the original
research reports
to CHS Xa distinction is made between TP-joints (plate
to CHS T-joints) and XP-joints (plate
joints), with theformer having aplate on one side of the
tube and the latter having plates on
both sides of the tube.
The design strength formulaein Fig. 25 have been
simplified in
a conservative way
so that they
f (p) = 4 + 20 p* fits
cover both types for variousload conditions. However for TP-joints with
5
the test results betterthan f(p) =
1 - 0.81 p '
Furthermore, all joints have to be checked forpunching shear:
for TP-5/XP-5: (fa -l-fb) . t1.I 0.58 ,,f ' to;
for other joints: (fa + fb) .t, I1.16 fp to,
where fa and fb are the axial and bending
stress in theconnected plate,I- or RHS section.
The design recommendationsin thefirst row coverXP-l/TP-1 and XP-3/TP-3 joints.
The XP-l/TP-l joints only have a plate perpendicular to the main chord axis whereas the
XP-3/TP-3 joints also have aplate parallel to the chord
axis.
Since the stiffness
of alongitudinal plate parallel to the axis
chord
is considerably smallerthan
that perpendicularto the chord axis,the strengthsof both joint types are about similar.

Details of a tubularroof support structure
38

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Steelbiz Licence Agree
Discuss me ...
Design strength for XP- and l'P-]ioints
I
type of joint
axial loading N' = f (p) . f (7) . f (n') . fyo tz

(eq. 4.6.2.1)
tI-
N' = f(p)
XP-1ITP-1
XP-31TP-3
5.0
1 - 0.81 p
lbending inplane
bending out of plane
f (7)
XP-2lTP-2
(1 + 0.25s)
M; = h, . N(XP-2)
(eq. 4.6.2.2)
754
XP-4lTP-4
I
5.0
1 - 0.81 p
W
XP-5lTP-5
(1 + 0 . 2 5 ~ )
Fig. 25 - Gusset platedconnections
1152
712
General remarks: for symbols, parameters and limitations: see axially loaded joints.
(D
.N(XP-l)
1
5.0
M; = h,
(eq. 4.6.2.3)
1 - 0.81 p
(1 + 0 . 2 5 ~ )
(eq. 4.6.2.4)
p = blldo
1= hlldo
MgP= 0.5 b,
. N(Xp4)
(eq. 4.6.2.6)
Discuss me ...
Flattened and cropped end bracing joints
4.6.3

Jointswithflattenedendbracingsaresometimesused,especiallyforsmallsizedand
temporary tubular structures. As shown
in Fig. 6, various typesof flattening can be provided.
In the case of full or partial flattening, the maximum taper from the tube to the flat should
remain within 25% (or 1:4), as shown in Fig. 6B and C. For doltoratios exceeding 25 the
flattening will reduce the compressive strength [l].
For welded connections the length of the flat part should be minimized for compression
members to avoid local buckling. Recommended design strength formulae for cropped-web
N-joints with overlap [23] are given
in Fig. 26. Compared to the ultimate
joint strength givenin
[23] for the vertical bracing loaded in compression a factor of 1.25 has been adopted to
account for the transformation from ultimate strength to design strength.
Since the behaviour
of this typeof joint may be influenced by size effects, care should be taken
in using these empirical formulae, and that
is why the validityis restricted to the dimensional
range tested:
dimensions tested (mm)parameterstested
114 5 do S 169
d0
550
145t0
42 S dl
0.35 5
90
dl
5 0.8
d0
dl
d2
35t,58
- = 1.0
3 5 t,
- = 1.0
4.6
f, 5 400
N/mm2
tl
t2
e, = g o o ; 8,= 450
For chords prestressed

in compression up to
80% of the yield load
the joint strength should be
multiplied by f (n) = 1 + 0.2n (02n 2 - 0.8). Higher chord prestress loads should not be
accepted since sufficient test evidence
is not available. For trusses with flattened and cropped
end bracings an effectivebuckling length le of 1.Otimes the system lengthis recommended.
Partial-flattened end bracing joints, as shown in Fig. 27, have recently been investigated in
CIDECT programme 5AP[26].
These joints can be designed with the joint
samestrength formulaeas given in Fig. 8 provided
that the following modifications are adopted:
T- and X-joints in compression: replace in the formula forNI:
d l by dlmn;
K-joints with gap: replace in the formula for N,:
40
Discuss me ...
(4.6.3.1)
(4.6.3.2)
(4.6.3.3)
w t h f In') = 1.0 for n'r 0

fIn')=1+0.2n'forOrn'r-0.8

30
15
10
14
11
02
0.3
04
0.5
0.6
07
0.8
0.9
dlid,
Fig. 26 - Design diagram for cropped end bracing connections
Fig. 27 - K-joint with partial-flattened end bracings
41
Discuss me ...
Bolted connections
The calculation methods used for many types of bolted connections between or to hollow
sections are not basically different from those used for any other
type of connection in
conventional steel construction.
(Some calculation examples will be given in chapter 6.5.) Bolted connections are especially
desirable for site joints between prefabricated sub-assemblies. Various examplesof bolted
connections aregiven in Figs.28 to 30 and 33.
I -sectton
ICHS-stub also
possible)
Profll
(Rohrstuck auch
rnoglich)
I
plate
Blech
'

~~
Fig. 28 - Bolted truss support connections

welded stud
Fig. 29 - Bolted purlin connections
Fig. 30 - Bolted end connections
42
__
-___
Discuss me ...

For flangejoint connections various investigations have been carried out (27,
281. However,
for simple designs the recommendations which are included
in the 1990 edition of the
Japanese Recommendations for the Design and Fabricationof Tubular Structures in Steel
1291 are most simple and are givenin Fig. 31.
Implicit in these connection detailsis an allowance for prying forces amounting
to 1/3 of the
total bolt forceat the ultimatelimit state and the assumption that
the tube yield strength must
be developed.
to plastification of
The modesof failure assumedin determining these details are those due
flange plates and not due to tensile failure of high strength bolts. The standard details
f, = 235N/mm2 and minimum
shown in Fig. 31 are for STK41 tubes. (specified minimum
ultimatetensilestrength
= 402N/mm2), SS41 plates(specifiedminimumyieldstrength
= 245 N/mm2) andFlOT bolts (about equalto 10.9 bolts with a specified minimum ultimate
tensile strength of 981 Nlmm).
max. tube
dimensions
dl x tl
(mm)
thickness of
flange plate
tl
(mm)
of bolt
(mm)
edge
minimum no. nominal
distance
of bolts diameter
el = e2
(mm)
60.5 x 4.0
through
25
89.1 x 4.0
101.6 x 4.0
through
25
114.3x 3.6
114.3x 5.6
through
d
30
139.8 x 4.5
el e
165.2x 5.0
190.7x 5.0
V6.3 x 6.0
35
35
35
36.3 x
Z67.4x
318.5x
355.6 x
106.4x
40
40
40
40
40
8.0
9.0
7.0
12.0
9.0
Fig. 31 - Standard details for flange joint connections (fullstrength connections)
According to 1281 the flange plate thicknesst, can be determined from:
where
N, = tensilememberforce
,f = yield strength of plate
Y,,,= 1. l (partial safety factor)
f, = dimensionless to be obtained from Fig. 32
t, = thickness of plate
43
Discuss me ...
10
6
'3
1

Fig. 32 - Parameter f3 for use in Eq. 5.1 for the design of a CHS flange plate connections
Tubular frame roof support
44
Discuss me ...
The dimension e l (see Fig. 31) should be kept as low as possible to minimizeprying action
(around 1.5 d to 2.0 d; d = bolt diameter), but the clearance between the nut and the weld
should be at least 5mm.
The number of bolts n canbe determined from:
where
r, = (d,/2 + 2 e l )
r2 = (d,/2 + e l )
T, = ultimate tensile resistance of a bolt

Other factors;see eq. 5.1.
Fig. 33 - Some examples of bolted connections
45
Discuss me ...
Worked out desing examples
6.1
a) Uni-planar truss
Truss lay-out:
The following dimensions are assumed:

Span = 36 m, Trusses L 12 m centres
Purlins,
L 6 m centres
Trussdepth
- span
2.40m (considering overall costs, e. g.costsof all cladding of the

buildung, deflections, etc. U15 is generally an economical

height)
.
l
-
-l
l'=
2.4
tan H = - = 0.8
6 X 6000 =
+ 36000
B = 38.7O
Fig. 34 -Truss layout
A warren type truss with K-joints is chosen to limit the number of joints.
The factored design load P from the purlins including the weight of the truss have been
calculated as P = 108 kN.
Member loads (kN)

A pin-jointed analysis of the truss gives the following member forces:
338
878
1148
Fig. 35 -Truss member axi-'

la1 luaus
0
675 kN
1080
1215'
Design of members
In this example the chords will be made from steel with a yield stress of 355 N/mm2 and
bracing from steel with a yield stress of 275 N/mm2.
For memberselection use either member resistance tables for
the applicable effective length
or the applicable buckling curve. Check the availability of the member sizes selected. Since
the joints at the truss ends are generally decisive, the chords should not be
too thin walled. As
a consequence a continuouschord with the same wall thickness over the whole truss length
is often the best choice.
top chord
use a continuous chordwith an effective in-plane and out-of-plane length of:

le = 0.9 x 6000 = 5400 mm 17, 161,
see chapter 2.2
No = 1148 kN
46
Discuss me ...

fY
NO
le
possible
sections
A,
Nlmm
(kN)
(m)
(mm)
(mm2)
355
1148
5.400
0 193.7-10.0
0 219.1 - 7.1
5771
4728
0 219.1 - 8.0
0 244.5- 5.6
5305
4202
0 244.5-
4714
6.3
X*
dolt,
X*
x .,,f
. A,
W )
1.09
0.94
19.40.61
0.71
30.9
1245
1189
27.4
43.7
0.95
0.84
0.71
1329
1159
38.8
0.84
0.78
0.78
1298
Eurocode 3 buckling curve a
From a material point of view the sections

0244.5 x 5.6 and0 219.1 - 7.1 are mostefficient;
however, these two dimensions are,the
forsupplier consideredin this example, not available
from stock (only to be delivered from factory). These dimensions can only
be used if a large
quantity is required, which is assumed in this example.
Bottom chord
possible
sections
Diagonals
f .to
Try to select members which satisfy
f, . t,
2.0; i.e.
355 71 2 2.0 or t, 5 4.5 mm, see eq. 4.2.7.

275 . t ,
in compressionan
initial effectivelength
Useforthebracingsloaded
= 0.75 J2.4 + 3.02= 2.88 m 17, 161, see chapter 2.2.
of
0.75
Compression diagonals
f,
Nlmm
NI
(kN)
275
275
275
*
**
259
86
(m)
possible
sections
A1
(mm)
(mm2)
X*
x . f,, . A,
2.881
4320 168.3-3.6
0 139.7-4.5
1862
1911
0.57
0.69
0.90
0.85
462
448
2.881
0 114.6-3.6
0 101.6-4.0
1252
1226
0.85
0.96
0.77
266
235
546
600
1.08
1.28
0.61
0.49
2.881
0 88.9-2.0
0 76.1-2.6
**
0.70
92
80
Eurocode 3 buckling curve a

the wall thickness is rather small for welding
47
Discuss me ...
Tension diagonals
Nlmrn
275
possible
sections
(kN)
(mm)
A2
$2
. A2
(mm2)
( W
0 88.9- 3.6
964
265
0 48.3-
332
91
445 432
1621 L3 133.3-4.0
275
259
275
86
2.3

Member selection
The number of sectional dimensions depends on the total tonnage to be ordered. In this
example forthe bracings only twodifferent dimensions will beselected.
Comparison of the members suitable for the tension members and those suitable for the
compression members shows thatthe following sections are most convenient:
- bracings:
0 139.7- 4.5
0 88.9-3.6
- top chord:
0 219.1 7.1
- bottom chord: C7 193.7- 6.3 (Thesechordsizesallowgapjoints;no
eccentricity is
required).
-
It is recognized that the dohoratios of the chords selected are high. This may give joint
strength problems in joints 2 and 5.
0 2 1 9 . 1 ~ 71
088.9X-36
~~~
---l
Fig. 36 - Member dimensions
Commentary and revision

Joint 1
Jotnt 1
In joint 1 between plate and bracing agap g = 2 to ischosen.This

joint is checked
as
a
K(N) joint.
Attention should be paid to the top chord shear capacity, i. e. cross
be able to resist the shear of 2.5 P = 2.5 x 108
= 270 kN.
is recommended to use
Sincejoint 1 is ratherheavilyloadedit
section
A should
conservatively
the elasticshear capacity of the top chord, i.e.:
+h?$A
-l*
2 to
Fig. 37
48
no ten 1
\r
0.5A0. fyo = 0.5 .4728.

\3
0.355
= 485kN > 270kN
v3

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Steelbiz Licence Agr
Discuss me ...
Check joint strength
T
joint
1
2
joint parameter
chord
(mm)
bracings
219.1 -7.1
plate
139.7 - 4.5
0.64
139.7-4.5
88.9 3.6
0.64
139.7-4.5
88.9 - 3.6
0.64
0.41
219.1 -7.1
fyo
dolt,
,f
(mm)
30.9
not appl.
2.0
30.9
12.8'
- 0.20
3
4
219.1 -7.1
88.9 - 3.6
88.9 - 3.6
193.7 6.3
139.7 - 4.5
139.7 - 4.5
0.72
88.9 - 3.6
139.7-4.5
0.72
6
7
P
W
219.1 -7.1
193.7 6.3
-
193.7 6.3
-
88.9 - 3.6
88.9 - 3.6
30.9
30.9
12.8
18.5
- 0.52
0.23
- 0.68
0.26
30.7
30.7
9.4
30.7
0.46
15.8
0.23
N*
10
. 11
0.82
0.32
2.04
1.60
0.82
0.98
0.23
2.04
2.55
1.49
0.49
0.32
2.04
2.55
1.22
0.32
0.32
2.55
2.55
1.05
0.82
0.82
2.9
'
0.58
> 1.oo
1.60
0.98
0.49
2.26
1.81
1.60
0.32
0.32
2.26
2.26
0.91
0.25
0.70
> 1.oo
1.81
1.81
0.29
> 1.00
0.70
0.70
0.85
0.85
> 1.oo
0.67
0.91
1.60
Discuss me ...
Joint 2
4 to
~~
338 kN i ?
t-'
he

Fig. 38
878 kN
The strength of joint2 is not sufficient. The

easiest
way
to obtain sufficient joint strength
will
to to 3 to
be to decrease the gapfrom12.8
resulting in a joint efficiencyof0.86
> 0.82.
However, this means that a (negative)eccentricity of e = 28 mm is introduced resulting in a
moment dueto eccentricities of:
M = (878-338).28.10--3= 15.12kNm.
Since the length and the stiffness El of the top chord members betweenjoints 1 - 2 and 2- 3
are the same (see Fig. 36) this moment can be equally distributed over both members, i.e.
both members have to be designed additionally for M, = 7.56 kNm.
to be checked as a beam-column.
The chord members between
joints 1 - 2 and2 - 3 have now
From these, the chord member 2- 3 is most critical. This check depends onthe national code
to be used.
However, the criterion to be checked hasgenerally a form of:
(6.1.1.)
where:
. fyo)of the chord (class1 or 2 sections);

use for class 3 elastic moment resistance (Weo-fyo)
= factor including second order effects depending on slenderness, section classification
and moment diagram (in this case use triangle)
= plastic resistance (W,,
7.56
878
113.3
0.74 + 0.067 k< 1.O (Independent on the code used this will not
be critical).
Purlin connections
Depending on the type of purlins various purlin connections are possible.

If corrosion will not occur, a cut out of the channel section welded on top of the chord at the
purlin support location and provided withbolt stubs provides an easy support.
I 108 kN
Fig. 39 - Purlin load
Fig. 40 - Purlin
connection
If single beam purlins are used, a plate a shown in Fig. 29 can be used.
50
Discuss me ...
Fig. 25 provides evidence for the design

of plate to tube connections.
For the purlin connection at the centre, another alternative is given to allow the site bolted
connection of the truss.
Fig. 41 - Purlin support at the site connection of the truss

The top chord can also be provided with end plates

In thatonly.
caseaT-stub for purlin support
has to be fitted in between the end plates.
Bolted site flange connections
Bottom tensile chord connection:

According to Fig. 31, 6 bolts 0 22- 10.9 are required for a full strength connection (i.e.
A,. fy0)of 0 190.7- 5.0 with f, = 235 N/mm2.
In this example the cross section area and the yield stresses
of the beam and the plate are
different from thosein Fig. 31 whereas the bolt strength remains the same. This means that
the numberof bolts has to be determined taking account
of these effects.
of bolts can be
For 0 193.7 - 6.3 withf, = 355 Nlmmand the same bolt strength the number
estimated to be:
193.7 x 63
190.7 x 5.0
355 . 6 = 12 bolts 0 22 - 10.9

235
Theendplatethicknesscanbe
e, = e2 = 35 mm.
20mm(f,
= 355N/mm2)andtheedgedistances
An alternativewill be to use:
1937 x 6.3 . 9 = 10 bolts 0 24- 10.9 with an end plate thickness of 22mm
2163 x 8o
(f, = 355 N/mm2) and the edge distances el = e2 = 40 mm.
Considering the C.O.C. distance of bolts,

the both options are possible.
Top compression chord connection:
Forthetopchordconnectionthecompressionloading
is transferredthroughcontact
pressure. The number
of bolts required depends on the erection loads which in
can
tension
be
and the national code requirements with regard to minimum strength related to the member
tensile strength.
In order to determine the number
of bolts for the compression flange connection, one could
conservatively treatit as a full strength tensile connection.
In the caseof a full strength connection 12 bolts
024- 10.9 are needed with end plates
of 22
of 40 mm.
mm (f, = 355 N/mm2) and edge distances
355
219.1 x 7.1
216.3 x 8.0 235
12
The end support connection canalso be made as shownin Fig. 28.

51
Discuss me ...
b) Arch-formed truss

Fig. 42 - Arched truss
The jointsof arch-formed trusses can be designed

in a similar way as those of straight chord
trusses. If the arch-formed chords are made by bendingthe
at joint locations only, the chord
members can also be treatedin a similar way as those
of straight chord trusses provided that
the bending radius remains within thelimits to avoid distortionof the cross section[4].
If the arch-formed chords are made by continuous bending, the chord members
a curved
have
shape betweenthe joint locations. In this case the curvature should be taken into account
in
the member design (moment = axial force x eccentricity) by treating the chord as a beamcolumn, see eq. 6.1.l. The k factor in eq. 6.1.1will now be smaller than in the example of
chapter 6.1due to the moment diagram.
Fig. 43 - Eccentricity moments in compression loaded chords of an arched truss
c) Vierendeel truss
(W2
t 3p
l
Fig. 44 - Vierendeel truss
I-
(P
I P
(P
&P
(P/2
I P
I I I I
t 3p
x
3000
~~~
-1
el . . .
For Vierendeel trusses with top and bottom chords
of the same bending stiffness- lnltlally
P
a simplified design calculation can be used,if:
- the loads act atthe joints
- the connections are rigid
- the longitudinal displacements of the chords can be disregarded
Underthese conditionsthemoments will be zero at
thecentresof the chord members between
the joints and the load and moment distribution can be determined easily.
Fig. 45 - Simplified modelling
52
Discuss me ...
1.75P
0.5P
0.5 P
0.5P
a) Moment and load dirtrlbutlon

Krafte- und Momentenvertellung
I
0.5p

b) Shear load an Vierendeel truss

Querkrafte am Vlerendeel-Trager
c ) Moments In members
Momente ~nden Staben
Fig. 46 - Load distributionin a Vierendeel truss
Chord members
The chord member loaded in compression has to be designed as a beam-column for the
following conditions (P in kN):
No = 1.5P kN and M, = 1.88P kNm (1.25P kN shear)
No = 3.9 P kN and M, = 1 .l2P kNm (0.75P kN shear)
No = 5.1 P kN and M, = 0.38P kNm (0,25P kN shear)
The first case with the highest momentwill be decisive.
Bracings
The bracings have to be checked for the moments, axial and shear loads.
second bracing is decisive with:
As shown, the
M, = 3.0P kNm,N, = 0.5 P kN and 2.4P shear load.
Joints
The jointsof the second bracing have the largest moment loading. The moments
in the chords
are in equilibrium with the moment in the bracing. Consequently, they do not have to be
considered for the prestress functionf(n). Since the bottom chord is loaded in tension, the
connections with the top chord are decisive
if the top and bottom chord have the same
dimension.
For the chord sections the moments are most
critical.
53
Discuss me ...
In the bracingsthe largest moment occursin the second one. At this point the prestress force
No, in the chord is relatively low.
M, = 3.0P kNm
No, = 1.5 P kN
For Vierendeel trusses the rotational stiffness of the joints is very important. This requires
joints with diameter ratios close to one, see chapter 4.4.
Evaluation

As shown before,the second bracing is the heaviest loaded member

in the Vierendeel truss.
The diameter is limited by the chord members and an increase
in bracing wall thicknes does
not increase the
joint strength, see Fig.20. Consequently, if all truss members are made from
the same dimension, this results
in over designof the other bracings andthe chord members
if lateral buckling is prevented.
Joint design
In this example it is assumed that all members are made from
sections 0 193.7-6.3 with f, = 355 Nlmm'.
According to Fig. 19, eq. 4.4.1 the design strengthis given by:
the same circular hollow
MI', = 4.85fY0. t$ . yO.5
MI; = 51.9. lo6Nmm

= 51.9 kNm S W,
,f
= 59.7 kNm
(f n') = 1.O)
N; = 0.3A,fy, = 395 kN (see Fig. 9).
M1 = 3 P
IkNrnl
NI =0.5P IkN)
Note:
The shearforce of 2.4 P need not be considered for the joint strength.
Fig. 47 -Joint loading
For P = 17 kN:
n'
=-- NO,
. fyo
N I -~
0.5 . 17
N; - 395
M;
A,
'5. l7 = 0.02, thus: f (n') = 1.O

3709 . 0.355
= o,02
51.9
interaction: eq. 4.5.1
5
+
N;
54
(3)'
= 0.99 5 1.0
Discuss me ...

Fig. 48 - Vierendeel end corner connections
The use of type a is in accordance with the previous calculations. Since the end cap
compensates for the increasing
joint rigidity, the chord is not continuous. Type
b can only be
used for low loads since the diagonal reaction forces in the corner cannot be transferred
satisfactorily. Type c with a fill-in plate provides an adequate load transfer.
Remarks
Especially, if thin walled sections are usedif or
the joint stiffness has to be taken into account
l.O), amoreprecisesemi-rigidframeanalysisbycomputerhastobecarriedoutto
determine the moment distribution and the deflections.
(p
Plastic designof Vierendeel trusses

If all of the tubes selected are class1 (plastic design) sections, and also meet the
criteria for
rigid joint behaviour,(suchas
p = 1.0 in theforegoingexample),amorefavourable
distribution of bending moments may be obtained
in the truss by the use
of Plastic Moment
Distribution (i. e. a setof moments whichis in equilibrium with the applied loads, by the Lower
Bound Theorem).
6.2
Multiplanar truss (triangular girder)
k
j
Fig. 49 -Triangular truss
55
Discuss me ...
0
Member loads
The member loads

will be determined in a similar wayas for theuni-planar truss,
assuming pin
ended members.
The load in thebottom chord follows by dividing the relevant moment by the girder depth.
Since twotop chords areused, the load at the top has to be
divided by 2.
The loads in the bracings follow from the shear forcesV, in the girder, i.e.:
VI
Fig. 50
lp,2 The
topchordsshould beconnected in the topplane for equilibrium of
loading. This canbeachievedby a bracing systemwhichconnectsthe
1
\
P/2

----c
Fig. 51
loading points.Connection of the loading points only, resultsina

triangular truss which has notorsional rigidity. Combination with
diagonals
gives
torsional resistance.
It is also possible to usethe purlinsor the roof structure as the connectingparts between the
loading points.
Now the loads
in one plane are known and the design can be treated
in a similar way as foruniplanar trusses.
0
Joints
The joints can also betreated in similar

a
way as foruni-planar joints, however,
taking account
of the reduction factorsof Fig. 17. This means a reductionfactor of 0.9 for the joints with the
bottom chord.
From a fabrication point
of view it is better to avoid overlaps
of the intersecting bracingsfrom
both planes. This may result sometimesin an offset.
Fig. 52 - Gap and offset
The offset (if 5 0.25 do) need not be incorporated in the joint design. For chords loaded in
tension this offset moment can also be neglected in the member design. For compressionloaded chords themoments due tothis offset have to be destributed
into the chord members
and taken into account in the member design
0
Designcalculation
Assume P = 187 kN (limit state)
DO@
93.5k,N
54 kN
kN
This means that the loads acting in the side planes of

the triangular truss are:
P
2 cos 30
Fig. 53 - Cross section of the triangular truss
56
. = 108 kN
Discuss me ...
This is equal to thepurlin loads usedin the design example for the uni-planar truss
in chapter
the diagonals can be the same to those for the uni6.1. As a consequence the top chord and
planar truss provided the same steel grades are used.
Only for the bottom chord the required cross section should be twice
required
that for theunia longer
planar truss, i.e. 0 219.1 - 11.O with A, = 7191 mm2. (This section may have
delivery time.)
0 2 1 9 . 1 ~ 7l
0 88.9x3.5
chords:
Gurte:
fyo = 355 N/mm2
diagonals: fyi = 275 N/mm2

Dlagonale.

Fig. 54 - Member dimensions and steel grades
The detailed checkof the members is already givenin chapter 6.1 and is the same
.
The bracings between the top chords are determined by the horizontal loads atofeach
54 kN
purlin support or by loads resulting from not equally distributed loading of the roof. Since
transport is simpler for V-trusses than for triangular trusses, it
is also possible to use the
purlins as connection between the top chords.
A simple bolted connection as given in Fig. 40 can easily transfer the shear loadof 54 kN.
However, in this way thetrusshasnotorsional
rigidity andcannotact
as horizontal
windbracing of the roof. If this is required, bracings between the
top chords have to be used.
0
check joint strength
In the table on
the following page the
joints have been checkedin a similar way as forthe uniplanar trussin chapter 6.1. However, the factor 0.9 has been included for the joint strength
of
joints 5, 6 and 7.
A connection without any eccentricity would result in an overlap of the bracing in the two
22.5 mm is chosen which resultsin
planes (Fig. 55a). To allow welding an out-of-planeof gap
an eccentricity of 50 mm (in-plane 43 mm). As a consequence the in-plane gap increases,
resulting in lower C, values which are given between brackets.
1- T
I
e=O
a
diaoonals: 0 139.7x4.5
e = 50mm
Fig. 55 - Connection diagonals with bottom chord
If an overlap is used, it should be bornein mind that the two overlapped diagonals have the
same type of loading. Now the sum of the vertical diagonal loading components should be
consideredandthe joint strengthcanbedeterminedwiththeuni-planarjointstrength
57

This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Steelbiz Licence Agr
Discuss me ...
Check jointstrength
joint parameter
actual
efficiency
joint strength efficiency (see Fig. 11)
multi-planar
factor
NI
-
N' ?N,
A, . f,
-4
remarks
The checks for joints 1 to 4 are given in the table in chapter 6.1
139.7-4.5
139.7- 4.5
219.1 19.9
-11.0
4.5
(9.4)
0.64
+
0.82
0.82
0.98
0.49
(17.7)
11.9
(21.4)
0.32
0.32
3.16
1.60
0.38
(0.33)
0.35
( = 0.31)
0.39
( = 0.35)
> 1 .oo
>3.16
1.00
(> 1 .OO)
0.9
> 1.00
3.94
3.16
1.60
3.94
3.94
1.60
> 1.00
( > l .OO)
> 1 .oo
> 1.00
( > l .OO)
0.9
0.9
Notes: - An eccentricity e = 38 mm has to be introduced to satisfy the condition g 2 t, + t,. However, for welding, a gap of 22.5mm is required between the
diagonals of both planes, which results inan eccentricity of 50 mm ( = 0.23do).
- The figures between brackets( ) show the estimated g' = g/to values for an in-plane eccentricity of50.cos3Oo = 43 mm.
Discuss me ...

6.3
dl
+ dP
dl
for -(see Fig. 55).
2%
do
The site and end support connections can be dealt with
in a similar way as in the exampleof
chapter 6.1.
equations, however,substituting
Truss with semi-flattened end bracings
To avoid overlapsin triangular trussesit is also possible to use semi-flattened end bracings,
as
shown in Fig. 27.
with the exception
The designof members issimilar to that discussedin chapters 6.1and 6.2,
of the bracings loadedin compression, for which an out-of-plane effectivelength factor of 1 .O
instead of 0.75has to be taken into account.
As shown in chapter 4.6.3,
the joint strength is reduced due to the fact that dl has to be
replaced by d, m,n in the joint strength formula.However, due tothe increaseof dl to dl max in
longitudinal direction of the chord, the gap sizeis decreased resulting in an increase in joint
strength. Since the above mentioned effects partly compensate each other, the actual joint
strength may not deviate considerably from that
of a joint with profiled bracings.
Full flattening,for which design information is given
in Fig. 26, is only recommended
for small
sized secondarystructures.
6.4
Effective buckling length of truss members
The buckling length of members of hollow

section trussesis dealt within [7].
The evaluationof
test results todesign recommendationsfor Eurocode 3 is givenin [16].
An updated Design Guide about
buckling is under progress.
In the examplesof chapters 6.1 and 6.2simple reduction factors have been included
for the
effective lengths, i.e.:
chords
in-plane:
out-of-plane:
0.9 x system
length
between
joints
0.9 x systemlengthbetween
the lateralsupports
bracings
in- and out-of-plane:0.75x system length between joints
For lateral unsupported truss chords the effective length be

canconsiderably lower than the
actual unsupported length. For example, the actual effective length
of a bottom chord loaded
in compression by uplift loading depends on the loading
in the chord, the torsional
rigidity of
the truss, thebending rigidity of the truss, thebending rigidity of the purlins and thepurlin to
truss connections.For detailed information, referenceis given to [l ,7].
For the example given
in the next figure, the
buckling length of the unsupported bottom chord
can be reducedto 0.32times the chord length
(L).
For the bracingsin compression thebuckling length re can be determined more precisely
by
[ 161:
(6.4.1)
59
Discuss me ...
Untergurt
~k
-0.32
Fig. 56 - Lateral bucklingof laterally unsupported chords

Using this formula also gives, for the bracings used in the example of section 6.1, effective
lengths of 0.75 P.
6.5
Boltedconnections
The bolts and theplates have to be checked

in the normalway forshear, contact pressure and
failure of the net crosssectional area. All national and internationalcodes give these criteria.
Furthermore, requirements regarding minimum and maximum bolt distances have to be
satisfied. For high strengthfriction grip boltedconnections special requirements are given for
pre-tensioningof the boltsand thecondition of the contact surfaces.
For bolted connections use is made
of plates, forks, T-sections or cutouts
of I-sectionswelded
general recommendations are
to the CHS member as shown in Fig. 30. For these connections
not given in the codes.Hence somecriteria are indicated here for full strength connections.
The shear strength fsweldand the axial strength fawelddepend on the codes used.
Tube-fork plate connection
(6.5.1)
(6.5.2)
Fig. 57
Afork plate
. f y plate
A,
fyl
(6.5.2)
Note: Since the twohalves of the tubeare eccentrically loaded, the bolted connection with
the fork plate
should be able to withstand the moment of eccentricity.
Tube-plate connection
4 I . a . f,
weld
+ 2 t . a . fa weld 2 A, . f,
41.t1.-f Y 1 +2t.t1.f,,
43
Fig. 58
Aplate . fy plate
(6.5.4)
rA,.fy,
(6.5.5)
fyl
(6.5.6)
A,
Note: To avoid premature cracking at the location where the tip of the plate is welded to the tube, some
An alternativeis to extend the
standardsrecommend an efficiencylimit of 0.85 Aplate.f,
gusset plate outsidethe tube by two times thegusset plate thickness.
60
Discuss me ...
Tube to T-stub connection
(6.5.7)
(6.5.8)
dl - t
t, 2 -
Fig. 59
(6.5.9)
Note: Eq. 6.5.9 is based on a spread under 2.5 to 1 as generally used in beam to column connections.
Gusset plate connection

t1*
Fig. 60
+ N,COSO,
(6.5.10)
2 N, cost9,
+ N,cost9,
(6.5.1
2 N, cos0,
+ N,cosO,
(6.5.12)
(6.5.13)
. fy
N, case,
N, case, I,
. fyo . tg . I . f (n') 2 N, sin O1 . I,
See Fig. 25:the value
(6.5.14)'
(in formula 6.5.14) shall never exceed 2 in the Calculation.
If the welds have a lower strength than the plate, the welds should also be checked for the
combined effect of shear and moment.
61
1)
Discuss me ...
Symbols
Circular hollow section
Rectangular hollow section
cross sectional area
cross sectional area of member (i = 0,1, 2, 3)
joint rotational stiffness(moment per radian)
efficiency parameter (general)
efficiency parameter for T-joints
efficiency parameter for X-joints
efficiency parameter for K-joints
modulus of elasticity

joint efficiency =
N,*
~
AI
. fy,
MI;
or-orM,!
M&
M,
moment of inertia
applied in-plane bendingmoment
applied out-of-plane bending
moment
joint design resistance for in-plane bendingmoment
joint design resistancefor out-of-planebending moment
plastic moment capacity of member i (i = 0, 1, 2, 3)
applied axial force in member 1 (i = 0, 1,2, 3)
joint design resistance expressed in terms of axial load in member i
characteristic joint strength expressed in termsof axial load
axial prestressing force in the chord, i.e. load in the chord not necessary for the
equilibrium of the bracing loadcomponents
overlap, Ov = qlp x 1000/0
load
characteristic load
ultimate tensileresistance of a bolt
shear force
elastic sectionmodulus of member i (i = 0, l,
2, 3)
plastic sectionmodulus of member i
throat thickness of a weld
width of plate
coefficient
bolt diameter
external diameter of member i (i = 0, 1, 2,3)
eccentricity of noding
edge distance
axial stress
design resistanceof a weld for axial loadingperpendicular to the weld
design resistanceof a weld for shear loading
bending stress
axial stress in member i (i = 0, 1, 2, 3)
specified design yield strength
specified design yield strengthof a plate
specified design yield strengthof member i (i = 0, 1, 2, 3)
maximum applied axialstress in chord, or maximum stress due to axial force and
bending moment where momentis taken into account
prestress in chord
function which incorporates thechord prestress in thejoint strength equation
Discuss me ...
gap between the bracings

of a K-,N- or KT-joint, at the connection face of the chord
gap divided by chord wall thickness,g' = g/to
depth of plate or depthof an I or RHS bracing section
integer used to denote member
of joint as follows:
0: chord
1: refers in general to a bracing for
T-, Y- and X-joints
refers to the compression bracing for K-, N- and KT-joints
2: refers to the tensile bracing for K-,
N- and KT-joints
3: refers to the vertical for KT-joints
length
effective length for buckling
number of bolts
No,
MO
A0 . $0
WO . $0
length of
o f projected contact area between overlapping bracing and chord without
presence of the overlapped bracing
projected lengthof overlap between bracings
of a K- orN-joint, at the chord face (see
Fig. 2)
parameters used for bolted flange connections,
i. e. r, = d,12 + 2 e l ; r, = di/2 + e l
thickness
end plateor flange thickness
thickness of hollow section memberi (i = 0, 1,2, 3)
diameter ratio between bracings and chord
fop

fyo
or ratio between plate or section width and chord diameter (TP- and XP-joints)
half diameter to thicknessratio of the chord, y = d0/2t0
material andjoint partial safety factor
load factor
acute angle between bracing memberi (i = l,2, 3) and the chord
angle between bracing membersin a multi-planar girder
bracing plate or section depth divided by chord diameter (TP- and XP-joints)
reduction factor for buckling
relative slendernessratio
Remark: Thenominal valuesof dimensions and the design values

for the yield strength should
be used in
the joint strength formulae
63
Discuss me ...
References
CIDECT:
Construction
December 1984.
with hollow
steel
sections.
Cidect
ISBN
0-9510062-0-7,
IIW-XV E: Design Recommendation for Hollow Section Joints

Predominantly statically
loaded. 2nd Ed., IIW Doc XV-701-89,September 1989.
CIDECT: Cidect Monograph No. 6. The Strength and Behaviour of Statically Loaded
Welded Connections in Structural Hollow Sections, 1986.
Dutta, D., Wurker, K.G.: Handbuch Hohlprofile
in Stahlkonstruktionen, Verlag TUV
Rheinland GmbH, Koln, 1988, ISBN 3-88585-528-3.

Wardenier, J.: HollowSectionJoints,DelftUniversityPress,

90.6275.084.2.
Delft, 1982, ISBN
CIDECT: Cidect Monograph No. 7. Fatigue behaviour of welded hollow sectionjoints,

1982.
CIDECT: Cidect Monograph No.4. Calcul des longueurs de flambement des elements
des poutres a treillis, 1980.
EC3: Eurocode 3. Common Unified Rules for Steel Structures, Commission
European Communities, Febr. 1990.
of the
Kurobane, Y.: NewDevelopmentsandpractices

in TubularJointDesign
(+
Addendum). International Institute of Welding, Annual Assembly, Oporto, 1981, Doc
XV-488-81.
Wardenier, J.: Welded joints between hollow sections. In: Structural Connections
Stability and Strength, Edited by R. Narayanan, Elsevier Applied Science,1989.
Reusink, J. H., Wardenier, J.: Simplified design charts for axially loaded of
joints
circular
hollow
sections,
Proceedings
International
Symposium
on
Tubular
Structures,
Lappeenranta, Finland, September 1989, Elsevier 1990.
Kremer, J. S. M., Packer, J. A.: Reliability of Tubular
Joints in Offshore Structures,
University of Toronto, Canada, December1985. ISBN 0-7727-7075-1.
Yura, J.A.: UltimatecapacityequationsforTubularJoints,ProceedingsOffshore
Technology Conference, 1980, OTC 3690.
[l41 Kurobane, Y. (Ed), Makino, Y. (Ed): Safety Criteria

Proceedings Int. meeting, Tokyo, July 1986.
in Design of Tubular Structures,
[l51 UEG: Designof Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures, Underwater Engineering Group
UEG, London, 1985.
[l61 Sedlacek, G., Wardenier, J., Dutta, D., Grotmann, D.: Evaluation of testresultson
3 Common
hollow section lattice girder connections, Background report to Eurocode
Unified rules for steel structures, Document5.07, Eurocode 3 Editorial Group.
(171 AWS D l . 1-90: Structural Welding Code- Steel, 1990, 12th Edition, American Welding
Society.
[l 81 Paul, J. C., Valk, C. A.C.
vld, Wardenier, J.: The static strength of circular multi-planar
Xjoints, Proceedings of the International
Symposium
on
Tubular
Structures,
Lappeenranta, Finland, September 1989, Elsevier, 1990.
64
Discuss me ...
Mitri, H. S., Scola, S., Redwood, R. G.: Experimental Investigation into the behaviour
of
axially loaded tubular V-joints, Proceedings
of the 1987 CSCE Centennial Conferene,
Montreal, May 1987.
Makino, Y . , Kurobane, Y., Ochi, K.: Ultimatecapacity of tubulardouble K-joints,
ProceedingsIIWconferenceWelding
of TubularStructures,Boston,Pergamon
Press, 1984.
Efthymiou, M.: Local rotational stiffness of unstiffened Tubular Joints, KSEPL Report
RKER 85.199.
Stol, H. G. A., Puthli, R. S., Bijlaard, F. K. S.: Experimental Research on Tubular T-joints
underproportionallyappliedcombinedstaticloading,ProceedingsBehaviour
of
Offshore Structures, Delft, July 1985, Elsevier 1985.

Ciwko, J. B., Morris, G. A.: Static Behaviour of Cropped Web Joints for Trusses with
Round Tubular Members, Cidect Report
5K-8119, Cidect 1981.
Yu, A. T., Rondal, J., Thonard, F.: Flat cuttingof Tube Ends for Joining Circular Hollow
Sections, Cidect Report 5AH-8511, Cidect, 1985.
Kurobane, Y., Makino, Y., Ogawa, K.: Further ultimate limit state criteria for design of
tubular K-joints, Proceedings
International
Symposium
on
Tubular
Structures,
Lappeenranta, Finland, September 1989, Elsevier 1990.
Rondal, J.: Study of maximum permissible Weld Gapsin Connections with Plane End
Cuttings (5AH2); Simplificationof Circular Hollow Section Welded Joints (5AP), Cidect
Report 5AH2/4AP-90/20.
Kato, B., Hirose, A.: Bolted tension flanges joining circular hollow section members,
Cidect report 8C-84124-E.
Igarashi, S., Wakiyama, K., Inoue, K., Matsumoto, T, Murase, Y: Limit Design of High
1 and 2, Journal of Structural and Construction
Strength Bolted Tube Flange Joint, Part
Engineering
Transactions
of AIJ,
Department
of Architecture
Reports,
Osaka
University, Japan, August 1985.
A.I.J.: Recommendations for the Design and Fabrication
of Tubular Structuresin Steel,
3rd Ed, Architectural Instituteof Japan, 1990.
Mang, F., Dutta, D.: Static Strength of Plate Connectionsto Circular and Rectangular
Hollow Sections, Cidectfinal report 5AM-89.
Wardenier, J., Packer, J.A.: ConstructionalSteelDesign;anInternationalGuide,
Chapter: Connections between Hollow Sections.
R. Bjorhovde. To be published by Elsevier
in 1990.
Eds. P.J. Dowling, J. E. Harding and
Rondal, J.: Effective lengthsof tubular lattice girder members statistical tests, CIDECT
Report 3K-8819. August, 1988.
Rondal, J.: Addendum to the Report 3K-8819, CIDECTReport 3K-89/9, August, 1989.
Acknowledgements for photographs:
The authors express their appreciation

to the following firms for making available the photographs used in this Design Guide:
coPLC Steel
British
Inc.
Mannesmannrohren
Werke A.G.
Centrum
Staal
.
Rohr Hoesch
65
Discuss me ...

International Committee
for the Development andStudy
of Tubular Structures
CIDECT founded in1962 as an international association joins together the research
resources of major hollow steel section manufacturers to create a major force in the
research and applicationof hollow steel sections worldwide.
The objectives of CIDECT are:

0 to increase
knowledgeof hollow steel sections and their potential application

by
initiating and participating in appropriate researches and studies
to establish and maintain contacts and exchanges between the producers

of the
hollow steel sections and the ever increasing number
of architects and engineers
using hollow steel sections throughout the world.
0 to promote
hollow steel section usage wherever this makes for good engineerin
practiceandsuitablearchitecture,ingeneralbydisseminatinginformation,
organizing congresses etc.
to co-operate with organizations concerned with practical design recommendations, regulations or standardsat national and international level.
Technical activities
The technical activities
of CIDECT have centred on the following research aspects
of
hollow steel section. design:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Buckling behaviour of empty and concrete-filled columns

Effective buckling lengths of members in trusses
Fire resistance of concrete-filled columns
Static strength of welded and bolted joints
Fatigue resistance of joints
Aerodynamic properties
Bending strength
Corrosionresistance
Workshop fabrication
The results of CIDECT research form the basisof many national and international
design requirements for hollow steel sections.
66
Discuss me ...
CIDECT, the future

Current work is chiefly aimedat filling up the gaps in the knowledge regarding the
structuralbehaviour of hollowsteelsectionsandtheinterpretationandimplementation of thecompletedfundamentalresearch.Asthisproceeds,anew
complementary phase is opening that will be directly concerned with practical,
economical and labour seving design.
CIDECT Publications

The current situation relating to CIDECT publications reflects the ever increasing
emphasis on the disseminationof research results.
Apart from the final reports
of the CIDECT sponsored research programmes, which
are available at the Technical Secretariat on demand at nominal price, CIDECT has
published a number of monographs concerning various aspects
of design with
hollowsteelsections.TheseareavailableinEnglish,FrenchandGerman
as
indicated.
Monograph
Monograph
Monograph
Monograph
No. 3 - Windloads for Lattice Structures (E, F,G)
- Effective Lengths of Lattice Girder Members (E, F,G)

- Concrete-filled Hollow Section Columns (E,F)
No. 6 - TheStrengthandBehaviour
of StaticallyLoadedWelded
No. 4
No. 5
Connections in Structural Hollow Sections(E)

Monograph No. 7 - Fatigue Behaviour of Hollow Section Joints(E, G)
A book Construction with Hollow Steel Sections, prepared under the direction
of
CIDECT in English, French, German and Spanish, was published with the sponsorship of the European Community presenting the actual state
of the knowledge
acquired throughout the world with regard to hollow steel sections and the design
methods and application technologies related to them.
Inaddition,copies
of thesepublicationscanbeobtainedfromtheindividual
members given below to whom technical questions relating to CIDECT work or the
design using hollow steel sections should be addressed.
The organization of CIDECT comprises:

0 President: J. C. Ehlers (Federal Republicof Germany)
Vice-president: K. Wikstrom (Finland)
Secretary: C. L. Bijl (The Netherlands)
0 A General Assembly of all members meeting once a year and appointing an

Executive Committee responsible for adiministration and executing
bished policy
ofesta-
Technical Commission and Working Groups meeting at least once a year and
directly responsiblefor the research and technical promotion work
67
Discuss me ...
<l Secretariat in Dusseldorf responsible for the day
to day running of the orga-
nization.
Present membersof CIDECT are:

(1990)
0
0

Cl
Cl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Altos Hornos de Vizcaya S.A., Spain

British Steel PLC, United Kingdom
Dalmine SPA, Italy
Hoesch Rohr AG, Federal Republic of Germany
Larninoirs de Longtain, Belgium
Mannesmannrohren-WerkeAG, Federal Republic of Germany
Mannstadt Hohl- und Kaltprofil GmbH, Federal Republic of Germany
Nippon Steel Metal Products Co. Ltd., Japan
Rautaruukki Oy, Finland
Sonco Steel Tube Ltd., Canada
Sonnichsen A/S, Norway
Stelco Inc., Canada
Tubernakers of Australia, Australia
Valexy, France
Verenigde Buizenfabrieken (VBF), The Netherlands
VOEST Alpine Stahl, Austria
Cidect Research Reports can be obtained through:
Mr. D. Dutta
Office of the Chairmanof the CIDECT Technical Commission
c/o Mannesmannrohren-WerkeAG
Mannesmannufer 3
D-4000 Dusseldorf 1
Federal Republicof Germany
Telephone:
Telex:
581
8
Telefax:
(49)211/875-34 80
421
(49)211 /875-46 89
Care has been taken to ensure that all data and information herein is factual and that
numerical values are accurate. To the best of our knowledge, all information in this book is
accurate at the time of publication.
CIDECT, its members and the authors assume no responsibility for errors or misinterpretation
of the information contained in this book or in its use.
68

CIDECT 1 - CHS Joint Under Static Loading PDF

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

CIDECT 1 - CHS Joint Under Static Loading PDF

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Construction with Hollow Steel Sections - Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly

Created on 24 May 2008

FOR CIRCULAR HOLLOWSECTION (CHS) JOINTS

Created on 24 May 2008

Edited by: Comite International pour le Developpement et I'Etude

Created on 24 May 2008

FOR CIRCULAR HOLLOW

Jaap Wardenier, Yoshiaki Kurobane, Jeffrey A. Packer,

Verlag TUV Rheinland

Created on 24 May 2008

CIP-Titelaufnahme der DeutschenBibliothek

0 by Verlag TUV Rheinland GmbH, Koln 1991

Created on 24 May 2008

Created on 24 May 2008

Created on 24 May 2008

CIDECT International Committee for

Created on 24 May 2008

Lift shaft with glass hQusessupported by tubular lattice frames

Created on 24 May 2008

Many examplesin nature demonstrate the excellent properties

Created on 24 May 2008

Design of tubular structures

In designing tubular structuresit is important that the designer considers the

cl partsal overlap jwnt w l t h negatlve eccentrlclty

dl total overlap joint wtth negatlve eccentrlclty

Fig. 1 - Noding eccentricity

achieved by limiting the wall slenderness

Created on 24 May 2008

Fig. 2 - Gap and overlap

- In common lattice structures, (e.g. trusses), about 50%

Created on 24 May 2008

the system length is assumed if supports in-planeand out-of-plane are availablethe

Fabrication of Tubular Structures

Created on 24 May 2008

Fig. 3 - Automatic flame cutting

Sizes of CHS bracings which can

Created on 24 May 2008

size of bracing (d,)

(all dimensions are in mm)

Fig. 4 - Single, double or triple plane cuttings

Fig. 5 - Weld details

Created on 24 May 2008

full flattening (B.C 1

partial flattening ID1

Fig. 6 - Various typesof flattening

Joint design under predominantly static loading

If the allowable load

In this case yS = 1.5 is recommended.

bracing and jolnt symbols

X - t y p e jolnt (91 = 90. c r o s s ~ o ~ n t )

Fig. 7 - Chord, bracing andjoint symbols

Created on 24 May 2008

Roof structure for an automobile exhibition hall

Created on 24 May 2008

Tubular triangulartrusses for a highway tax paying station

Created on 24 May 2008

Joints in uni-planar trusses

Typical uni-planar joints are

Created on 24 May 2008

K and N gap or overlapjoints

punching chear checkfor T, Y, X and

(see Fig. 13)