Plagiarism report

3% of non-unique content
Content appears in 5 internet pages

Sources:

Report generated on
Sunday, December 14 2014
05:00 PM

Amount of matching content

www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000...

1%

www.shirazu.ac.ir/en/index.php?page_id=2486

1%

ijstc.shirazu.ac.ir/pdf_655_5dd1107827cda38f509262...

1%

www.shirazu.ac.ir/en/index.php?page_id=2486&menu_i...

1%

core.kmi.open.ac.uk/display/15129671

1%

www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlin...

1% matched content

(...A. Dalalbashi Esfahani, D. Mostofinejad, S. ...)

www.shirazu.ac.ir/en/index.php?page_id=2...

1% matched content

(...A. Dalalbashi Esfahani, D. Mostofinejad, S. ...)

ijstc.shirazu.ac.ir/pdf_655_5dd1107827cd...

1% matched content

(...A. Dalalbashi Esfahani, D. Mostofinejad, S. ...)

www.shirazu.ac.ir/en/index.php?page_id=2...

1% matched content

(...A. Dalalbashi Esfahani, D. Mostofinejad, S. ...)

core.kmi.open.ac.uk/display/15129671...

1% matched content

(...A. Dalalbashi Esfahani, D. Mostofinejad, S. ...)

Full Text
S.S.Manekari and S.S.Patil [1] used finite element modeling to model and analyze a beam column joint. With the help ANSYS, a
model for corner as well as exterior beam column joint was analyzed with the application of monotonic load. The parameters varied
were the end conditions, viz., fixed end conditions, hinged end conditions; also the stiffness of the joint was also varied and the
parameters determined from the analysis were deflection, maximum stress and minimum stress. The results show that with
increase in load the deflection, maximum stress and minimum stress increases; also the displacement, minimum stress and
maximum stress vary non linearly with change in stiffness.

S.V.Chaudhari, K.A.Mukane, M.A.Chakrabarti [2] studied the exterior beam column joint using finite element software. ANSYS and
ABAQUS were used to model an exterior beam column joint and monotonic load was applied. The parameters varied were the end
conditions, viz., fixed end condition and hinged end condition. The results show that ANSYS portrays results that as load increases
the joint gets more stiffened and the actual behavior of the reinforcement is not seen while ABAQUS shows the or realistic load
displacement behavior of the joint.

Suhasini M Kulkarni, Yogesh D Patil [3] carried out finite element analysis for the evaluation of advanced reinforcement pattern
using ANSYS. An exterior beam column joint is modeled with cross inclined bars at the joint and cyclic load was applied. The
parameters varied were grade of concrete and its effect on stiffness were studied. Also, comparison between seismic joint and
advanced reinforcement pattern joint was made. Results state that stiffness ARP was more than Seismic joint when intensity of load
increases also the joint shear stress developed in ARP was less than Seismic Joint by 2%.
Anthony John Viany, Sandep T.N, M.A.M Azhar[4] conducted experiments on beam column joint with irregular steel fibres to
determine optimum percentage of steel fibres along with finite element modeling using ANSYS for deflection study. From the
experiment results it was learnt that steel fibers in the optimum amount not only increases strength but also plays an important
role in preventing, delaying and propagation of cracks. The ANSYS results match with the results obtained from the experiment
results.

A. Dalalbashi Esfahani, D. Mostofinejad, S. Mahini, H.R. Ronagh[5] conducted a numerical investigation to determine the behavior of
FRP retrofitted RC exterior beam column joints. A finite element model using ANSYS was created ignoring the effects of bond slip.
Experiments on 3 beam-column joint specimens were carried out applying cyclic load. And the results were compared with the
model. The parameters studied are the hysteresis curve and variation of results with variation in stiffness. The results suggested
that further study using finite element tools could provide valuable information about determining the most effective retrofitting
scheme for a beam column joint.

I.K. Fang, C.C. Lee, L.W. Chou, P.S. Chiu, T.W. Liu & J.M.Yeh [6] performed analysis on fire resistance of an exterior beam column
joint using analysis based software ANSYS. The analysis results were correlated with the experimental tests performed on 3 full
scale beam column joints. The experiments were performed on both normal concrete as well as self compacting concrete and the
results were compared.

Kazuhiro Kitayama, Shunsuke Otani and Hiroyuki Aoyama [7] suggested a set of criteria for reinforced interior beam column
connections. It is known that under earthquake, the bond in the beam column joint detiorates and it was suggested that the bond
deterioration cannot be prevented, hence depending on the response of the structure, the deterioration is controlled. The shear
which is transferred to the junction is controlled. Also it was suggested that the transverse reinforcement is used to confine
concrete and not to resist shear alone.

Muthuswamy K.R, Thirumurugan G.S [8] studied the experimental behavior of hybrid fiber reinforced beam column joint. The
beam-column joint were cast, with normal concrete as well as fiber reinforced concrete, to 1/5th to the original scale were subjected
to cyclic load. The parameters which were analysed after experiments were load carrying capacity, load deflection behavior,
ductility, energy absorption, stiffness and failure patterns. The results seen were that HFRC shows ductility 1.5 times more than
conventional RCC joint also the stiffness of HFRC is 1.8 times conventional joint and the rate of degradation was also low for HFRC.
The results also showed that HFRC failure occurred after a number of cracks appeared along the beam and concrete crushing in
columns. Finally, they suggested that HFRC used in beam column joints present more advantages than conventional RCC.

Jamal A Farhan, Zaid M. Kani [9] performed finite element analysis on beam column joint with steel fibers at the jo