Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ABSTRACT
For all the experiment, theoretical calculation was performed and the reading from the VDAS
system is taken to compare and measure the accuracy of the system as well as the calculation.
Throughout the experiment, the VDAS system played a major role in the calculation part.
Page | 2
OBJECTIVE
There are four parts to this experiment, the respective objectives for the experiments are as
follows:
Page | 3
THEORY
The basis of most strain measurement is the Wheatstone Bridge, shown in Figure 11. It has
four identical resistances (R1, R2, R3 and R4) connected end to end in a diamond shape. An
input voltage (Vj) connects across two opposite connections. The output voltage is measured
at the other two connections.
Page | 4
Curve 1 shows how the output of a Wheatstone Bridge changes when resistor R1 changes.
The output is not linear, but It will give good results for small resistance changes.
Curve 2 shows how the output of a Wheatstone Bridge changes when resistor R1 and an
opposite resistor (R4) changes by the same amount. The output is twice as much as with a
single resistance change, but again the curve is not linear.
Curve 3 shows how the output of a Wheatstone Bridge changes when resistor R1 and an
adjacent resistor (R3) changes by the same but inverse amount. The output voltage of the
bridge doubles and the curve becomes almost linear.
Curve 4 shows how the output of a Wheatstone Bridge changes when resistor R1 and an
adjacent resistor (R3) changes by the same but inverse amount, and also the resistance of the
opposite resistors R2 and R4 change by the same amount. The output is four times greater
than with a single gauge and the curve is linear.
Page | 5
To calculate the strain from the dc voltage across the bridge, the Strain Display uses a
standard equation:
(1)
Stress ()
This is the force applied to a material over a known area. It is found by the equation:
Strain ()
This is the change in length (distortion caused by stress) of a material over its original length.
It is found by the equation:
Compressive strain is where the material has compressed. It has a negative value.
Tensile strain is where the material has stretched. It has a positive value.
Page | 6
Page | 7
EQUIPTMENT
The equipment used for this experiment is a Strain Gauge Trainer SM1009
that is connected to the Versatile Data Acquisition System (VDAS).
Page | 8
Page | 9
The strain display is a metal box with a display, controls and input sockets.
The input sockets accept the signals from the color-coded strain gauges
on the three different systems of the Strain Gauge Trainer. The multiple
display shows the output voltage measure across the strain bridge and
automatically calculates and displays the strain.
The box also has a socket for connection to the hardware of the VDAS, to
allow data to be transferred to a computer.
P a g e | 10
P a g e | 11
P a g e | 12
Table 2 Half Bridge 1 Connection - Opposite Arms (two gauges measure the same strain)
P a g e | 13
Table 3 Half Bridge 2 Connection - Adjacent Arms (two gauges measure opposite strain)
P a g e | 14
1200
1000
Voltage (V)
800
f(x)
0.73
f(x) =
= 1.42x
1.4x - -6.86
600
400
200
0
100
200
300
400
500
Load (kg)
Full Bridge
Quarter
Linear (Quarter)
Graph 1
Sample Calculation:
Using equation (1) to calculate the calculated strain:
36
2.11 0.5 1
13.64
600
P a g e | 15
DISCUSSION
The results obtained shows observable differences when the types of connection of the bridge
changes. Though the stain recorded for all the 4 bridge are similar and close to each other, the
output voltage (Vo) varies from one to another.
The obtained data is used to plot output voltage vs load graph, and the graph is displayed as
Graph 1. Graph 1 shows that by using Full Bridge Connection gives out highest output
voltage compared to all the other configuration while Quarter Bridge Connection had the
lowest voltage output and Half Bridge Connection falls in between this two configuration.
To display the slope precisely, the gradient of each line is shown in Graph 1. All the gradient
obtained for all the connection was linear.
P a g e | 16
P a g e | 17
Calculate
d Strain(
0
11.6
23.2
34.8
45.8
57.4
69
80.6
92.2
103.8
114.8
Measure
d Strain(
0
13
27
40
53
67
80
93
107
120
133
Percenta
ge Error
(%)
0
12.06
16.37
14.94
15.72
16.72
15.94
15.38
16.05
15.60
15.85
P a g e | 18
20
15
Stress
10
5
0
20
40
60
80
Strain
Graph 2
Sample Calculation:
Force:
20 5 3
12
208.33 mm
100
120
140
P a g e | 19
DISCUSSION
The strain reading and calculated strain reading was combined to check for the percentage
difference, although the readings are not very deviated there calculated percentage error was
about 15.85% the most. The higher error occurred when the load was increased and the
highest error was when the load of 500g was placed.
Graph 2 was plotted calculated stress and displayed strain in order to obtain the Youngs
Modulus of the beam. From the gradient of the graph, it was noted that the Youngs Modulus
obtained is 178.5 GN/m2 and the actual modulus of the beam is 207 GN/m2. The percentage
of error is 13.5%.
P a g e | 20
P a g e | 21
Add a small weight hanger to the end of the torque arm. The end of the torque arm has a
smaller diameter part to accept the weight hanger hook at a known length and torque
radius.
The small weight hanger is 10 g. Add 24 x 10 g weights to the weight hanger to give a
total weight (load) of 250 g. Note the strain reading into your table. If you are to use
VDAS, adjust the value of the mass to 250 g and click on the 'Record Data Values'
button.
Add more weights to the weight hanger until you reach 500 g. Note the strain reading
into your table. If you are to use VDAS, adjust the mass to 500 g and click on the
'Record Data Values' button
Table 7
Strain
Reading
Polarity
(+/-)
Blue
-24
Type of Strain
(Compressive/Ten
sile)
Compressive
Red
23
Tensile
Yellow
-23
Compressive
Green
23
Tensile
Table 8
P a g e | 22
Part 2
Table 9
Sample Calculation:
0.37 0.01
2 981.75E-12
= 1.88 MN/m2
1.88 M
79.6 G
=23.6E-6
DISCUSSION
In the first part of the experiment 3 we are observing the type of the strain experienced by the
rod. There are four gauge on the rod and when fixed in quarter configuration were able to
differentiate the polarity. The obtained strain value are similar with all the gauges measured
but the negative and positive value indicates weather it compressive twisting strain or tensile
twisting strain. From this understanding, were able to determine the gauges to be used for
the second part of the experiment.
In the second part of the experiment, the differences between theoretical and displayed stain
are small and the values are close to each other. The percentage of error is below 6% for each
of the values.
P a g e | 23
P a g e | 24
Part 1
Table 10
Part 2
Table 11
P a g e | 25
Graph 3
Sample Calculation
1
=0.33
(2.99)
P a g e | 26
Part 3
Table 12
DISCUSSION
In part 1, half bridge configuration was used to measure the stain. The strain observed is
tensile strain, this was found through the polarity of the values obtained. The obtained value
has a close proximity with the real value of the strain.
In part 2, the gauges are replaced and the experiment was repeated again. The strain observed
is compressive strain, this was found through the polarity of the values obtained. The
obtained value has large deviation to the real value of the strain. After looking through the
data and concluding, the reason could be due to the wrong gauge made on the VDAS system
which gave fairly a large deviation from the theoretical reading. Using the data obtained to
plot a graph, taking the gradient of the graph which is -2.99. Substituting that values into
the formula to obtain Poissons Ratio, gives a values of v=0.33 which is found to be in close
proximity if coppers Poissons, =0.35 .
In part 3, using all four gauge gives us a more precise reading. Setting the Strain Display to
match your chosen strain gauge connections and their gauge factor. Supplied with the
equipment are special plugs with built-in high precision dummy resistors, for use when you
only measure one or two active arms (gauges).
P a g e | 27
CONCLUSION
Able to understand and use the Bending system to show the equation used by the strain
display and to show and compare different strain bridge connection and show the linearity of
strain measurement. The usage of the bending system together with the usage of VDAS
system was fully understood. Object under load bends and the compared values with the
theoretical gave a better understanding of objects under bending. By carrying out the torsion,
it was understood how to connect the gauges in the correct manner and obtain the date in
order to determine the type of the strain. By carrying out tension experiment, it was
understood to connect and use strain gauges to measure strains in two dimensions. Able to
compare the tensile strains and prove Poissons Ratio from the obtained data. VDAS system
played a major role and aided in the measuring and calculation part reducing the time and
easing the work load of an engineer.