Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1)
2)
1. Summary
Efficiency improvement is the new challenge in all
fields of design. In this scenario the reduction of power
losses is becoming more and more a main concern also
in the design of power transmissions. For this reason it
is important to have models available in order to quantify the power losses since the design stage.
Furthermore, a reduction of the dissipated power implies some improvements in other aspects like system
reliability, downsizing, system architecture and so on.
In this paper a CFD based approach has been adopted in
order to predict the power losses generated by a single
rotating gear and by a meshing gear pair. The results
have been compared with measured ones showing extremely good agreement.
Keywords: gear, efficiency, churning losses, CFD,
multiphase
2. Introduction
Efficiency is becoming more and more a main concern
in the design of power transmissions for all the fields of
application and increasing the efficiency of power transmissions can give a significant contribution to the reduction of pollutant emissions and energy savings.
Moreover the reduction of power losses, which are dissipated in the form of heat, can imply improvements in
other aspects like reliability, related to different thermal
regimes, downsizing, weight reduction and system architecture. The first step to improve efficiency is to have
appropriate models to compare different design solutions. Even if power transmissions are typically a part of
a complex system in which other parts very often have
much bigger power losses, like combustion engines for
instance, nevertheless improvements in their efficiency
can determine big savings on a global scale.
The power losses of a mechanical transmission can be
subdivided primarily into bearing losses, seal losses,
meshing losses and hydraulic losses [1]. Literature provides some models for the prediction of most of them.
Some models, obtained on the basis of experimental
tests, can be found in literature which describe the influence of gear geometric and kinematic parameters on hydraulic losses like for instance those proposed by Mauz
[2] or by Dowson [3], who has concentrated only on
windage losses. Nevertheless, the authors maintain that
a deeper understanding of the physical phenomena responsible for gear losses is still needed in order to improve existing models and CFD simulation can be an effective approach for such investigation.
Marchesse et al. [4], on the basis of a state of the art
concerning the application of CFD to the prediction of
gear power losses, applied CFD models to study
windage losses of gears and have validated their results
by means of experimental tests.
Simulations of the churning losses of planetary gearboxes and squeezing losses have been investigated by
the authors in previous works [5, 6].
A large amount of experimental data on churning and
windage power losses is available at FZG, resulting
from several years of tests [9], both for single gears and
for two meshing gears completely or partially immersed
in oil. This data covers the influence of several parameters like tip diameter, face width, helix angle, temperature and oil type. In a previous work [10], the authors
have investigated the windage losses of a single rotating
gear (100% immersion in the lubricant) by mean of
CFD simulations and the results have been compared
with the experimental ones available at FZG giving
good agreement. In order to improve the understanding
of the mechanisms involved in churning losses (dip lubrication with the presence of a free surface), CFD simulations have been run in order to investigate the effect
of some parameters, on the power losses generated by a
single rotating gear and by a meshing gear pair. The numerical results have been compared with the measurements.
3. Problem description
A simple geometry consisting in a gearbox with either a
single rotating gear mounted on a cantilevered shaft or
two engaging gears was used both for the simulations
and for the experiments. Both shafts are supported each
by two bearings. The primary shaft is then connected to
an electric motor that provides the power (that is completely dissipated, part by the bearings and part by the
gears in terms of no-load losses).
Some preliminary tests with one single rotating gear
and 100% oil filling have been conducted in order to
validate the numerical model [10]. At this point of the
research, some numerical simulations concerning two
meshing gears have been performed and additional tests
conducted in order to assess the quality of the CFD
based results.
ui
=0
x i
where x i is the Cartesian coordinate and ui is the
velocity component. The second equation is the averaged momentum conservation equation and can be written as follows
Kinematic
viscosity at
40 C
40 [mm/s]
Density at
15 C
15 [kg/m]
FVA2
29.8
5.2
871
5. Numerical model
5.1. Geometry and mesh
In the numerical simulations some geometry simplifications have been adopted. Despite of the cantilever
shafts, it was chosen to consider the model as symmetric. This simplification was adopted in order to reduce
the volume of the considered domain and, consequently,
to reduce the amount of cells needed for the numerical
discretization. After this simplifications, the virtual
model appears as shown in figure 2.
( u i ) ( ui ui )
=
+
t
x j
ui u j ij
( p )
+
[ (
)
]
t
xj
x j xi
xj
Where
p is the pressure, ui are the Cartesian
coordinates and is the density. The additional
term that compare in the averaged equation ij (in
comparison to the not-averaged transport equations) is
called unresolved term or Reynolds term and can be
expressed by using the eddy-viscosity hypothesis.
The last governing equation, the energy conservation,
was not activated in the given models and the
temperature set a priori changing the oil properties.
6. Operating conditions
With CFD analysis the effect of different parameters
was investigated. Table 2 summarizes the combination
of parameters adopted in the different simulations.
Table 2: combination of parameters adopted for the
CFD simulations
Gears
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
b [mm]
40
40
40
40
40
40
20
20
20
40
40
40
da [mm]
102.5
102.5
102.5
96,5
96,5
96,5
102.5
102.5
102.5
98
98
98
n [rpm]
2000
5000
8000
2000
5000
8000
2000
5000
8000
2000
5000
8000
Phases
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
7. Results
NIEMANN,
G.,
WINTER,
H.:
Maschinenelemente Band II Getriebe allgemein,
Zahnradgetriebe Grundlagen, Stirnradgetriebe,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg Ney York
Tokio 1983