Due to fast urbanization, buildings and other structures are being
responsible for a significant portion of the Green House Gas emissions and the climate change associated with it. Buildings consume 72% percent of electricity generated in the US every year. [8] Therefore, the adoption of clean energy generation techniques particularly for the context of urban infrastructures should be widely studied. Roof tops account for about 25% of urban land cover. So, they could serve as a great ground for generating energy. However, the rooftops are not always suitable for PV deployment as they may have some obstructions that can cast shadows on the available space thereby limiting the useful space for solar energy generation like overhead tanks, HVAC vents, chimneys, skylights, and/or plumbing vents. No studies before have presented a technique to find out the useful space from satellite data. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
The research was aimed at developing and validating a new
method for assessing the capacity of a building for the rooftop PV to be deployed using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and estimating the potential energy production using energy modeling and simulation tools.
METHODOLOGY
To accurately calculate the useful rooftop area for PV installation,
Quickbird remote sensing data images were processed by Definiens Developer software to identify obstructions on the roof- tops and the results exported into ArcGIS (geographical information system) for use in conjunction with the shadow analysis of rooftop obstructions Google SketchUp , a three dimensional computer modeling program that is able to accurately cast shadows on a model based on the longitude and latitude of the site was used for shadow analysis. Based on the available rooftop area, the RETScreen PV Sizing Software was used to assess the energy production, life-cycle
costs, and emission reductions.
Climate data from the Phoenix ground monitoring stations and NASAs global satellite/analysis data, including temperature, humidity, wind, and solar radiation was utilized in the simulation. Also, for this study poly-crystalline silicon PV panels with 12.9% efficiency were selected so as it will represent the average efficiency of PV systems available in the market. AREA STUDIED:
Although the focus of the study was to identify useful area
available for PV installations on rooftop and the amount of electricity produced, it also quantified the indirect benefits of the installation which includes reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and reduced water use based on the simulation result and energy data associated with reduced electricity generation from fossil fuel sources. The site selected for this case study was a four-square-mile area (10.36 km2) located in Chandler, Arizona part of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area (PMA). Electricity is provided by a single utility company and the electricity consumption data were collected for the three year period from 2006 to 2008. The total electricity consumption figures were 183 GWh, 198 GWh, and 182 GWh for 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
RESULT
Based on the spacings required between PV arrays on the
rooftop, peak solar output was determined to be 7.8 W/ft2 (83.96 W/m2). Using this solar output, a referenced 8.4 kWp system was developed that could be installed on a 1076 ft2 (100 m2) rooftop.
The simulations showed that deploying PV systems in the area
studied would result in reductions of 12,200 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), 0.142 tons of methane(CH4), and 0.175 tons of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions annually.
CONCLUSION
The annual electricity production of the 8.4 kWp PV system on a
1076 ft2 (100 m2) rooftop area used as a reference was 15.5 MWh. This reference system was then used to calculate the
energy that could be generated by installing PV systems on the
rooftops of the 932 governmental and commercial buildings in the area studied. The results of this calculation revealed a potential PV system capacity of 10,080 kWp and a subsequent total annual electricity generation of 18,600 MWh. This renewable energy generation source could replace 10% of the total electricity consumption of all the buildings, including residential, commercial, and governmental buildings in the case study area normally generated from conventional fossil fuel energy sources, based on their average annual average electricity demand from 2006 to 2008 of 182,230 MWh.