Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Kaolincarbon adsorbents were prepared with and without sulfuric acid pretreatment followed by activationcarbonization at
500 C. The total surface area of the resulting kaolincarbon adsorbents was found to be decreased with the increase in kaolin
loading. Sulfuric acid pretreatment of the precursor prior to the
carbonizationactivation processes resulted in the enhancement of
total surface area but reduced the micropore surface area of the
resulting adsorbents. At the same time, this improved carotene adsorption capacity from red palm oil. However, recovery of carotene
from the carotene-adsorbed adsorbent is only improved when the
acid pretreatment of the precursor was done at a high loading percentage of activated carbon. Similarly, the peroxide value (PV)
increased. A maximum removal of carotene from red palm oil
was obtained at 20% kaolin loading for both adsorbents prepared
with and without sulfuric acid pretreatment with about 45 and
65% carotene removal, respectively, from a 30-ppm solution. This
indicates that pretreatment with sulfuric acid, prior to the
activationcarbonization process, increased the carotene uptake by
the resulting adsorbent. However, a further increase in the kaolin
loading resulted in the decrease of carotene removal. About 34%
of carotene adsorbed can be recovered from both types of adsorbents under optimum condition, in which the percentage recovered
decreased with the increase in kaolin loading. On the other hand,
the PV increased with kaolin loading at around 5464 mEq/kg for
both types of adsorbents. It was also found that carotene uptake
by the adsorbents is high if the adsorbent contains a high percentage of activated carbon. Similarly, carotene recovery is high
and less oxidation can be observed, as indicated by the lower PV
value. C 2001 Academic Press
Key Words: kaolin; activated carbon; activated carbonkaolin
complexes; surface area and porosity; carotene removal; red palm
oil.
INTRODUCTION
Activated clay and activated carbon are two common adsorbents, which have many applications in separation technology,
ranging from the food industry to waste water treatment. Of
late, the preparation of both has been a subject of interest, especially from low-cost agroindustrial by-products such as palm
kernel shells (1), oil palm trunks (2), almond shells (3), and olive
stones (4), to name a few.
1
0021-9797/01 $35.00
94
HUSSEIN ET AL.
[1]
To recover the adsorbed carotene, the carotene-adsorbed adsorbents were mixed with 50 ml of toluene and stirred continuously for 40 min, followed by solvent filtration and evaporation
using a rotary evaporator. The recovered carotene obtained was
subjected to UV-visible measurement and the amount was calculated using Eq. [1].
Determination of Peroxide Value
The extent of oxidation of RPO after carotene removal was
determined by its peroxide value. About 0.5 g of RPO was added
into a 250-ml conical flask, followed by the addition of 30 ml
of a mixture of acetic acidchloroform solution (3:2 v/v). The
resulting solution was then added with 0.5 ml of KI saturated
solution and swirled for 1 min. After that, 30 ml of distilled
water was added, followed by titration with standardized sodium
thiosulfate solution using constant and vigorous shaking until the
light-yellow color has almost disappeared. A total of 0.5 ml of
1% starch solution was added as an indicator and the titration
was continued until the blue color disappeared. The result was
reported as milliequivalents of peroxide per kilogram of sample
(mEq/kg).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
X-Ray Diffraction
Figure 1a shows powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns
for activated carbon and its mixtures with kaolin at various
kaolin-loading percentages, 20100%. As shown in the figure,
an amorphous character of the activated carbon can be seen
clearly for 100% activated carbon. On the other hand, the XRD
pattern for 100% kaolin is dominated by two peaks with d values
95
FIG. 1. PXRD patterns for (a) KAM and (b) KAC prepared at various
percentages of kaolin loading (w/w), 0100%; the peak labeled with a diamond
is due to an aluminum sample holder.
FIG. 2. Adsorptiondesorption isotherms for KAM prepared at various percentages of kaolin loading (w/w): (a) 100, (b) 80, (c) 60, (d) 40, (e) 20, and
(f) 0%.
96
HUSSEIN ET AL.
FIG. 3. Adsorptiondesorption isotherms for KAC prepared at various percentages of kaolin loading (w/w): (a) 100, (b) 80, (c) 60, (d) 40, (e) 20, and
(f) 0%.
FIG. 4. The dependence of surface areas and the percentage of micropores to the total surface area for KAM and KAC to the percentages of kaolin
loading (w/w). Closed and open symbols are for KAC and KAM, respectively.
Circles designate micropores and squares total surface area. The percentage of
micropore contribution to the total surface area is also indicated.
97
TABLE 1
Surface Properties of KAM and KAC
Surface area (m2 /g)
Composition
Activated carbon
BET
Langmuir
Micropore
Micropore volume
(cc/g)
100
20
80
40
60
60
40
80
20
100
1332
(1387)
1013
(829)
746
(640)
439
(640)
247
(368)
19
(37)
1783
(1861)
1366
(1130)
1002
(875)
586
(875)
328
(500)
()
940
(828)
768
(512)
577
(319)
338
(319)
182
(167)
2
(3)
0.4
(0.4)
0.4
(0.2)
0.3
(0.2)
0.2
(0.2)
0.1
(0.1)
0.001
(0.001)
29.4
(28.5)
37.8
(35.8)
49.8
(38.2)
85.1
(38.2)
157.4
(42.0)
232.5
(79.1)
Kaolin
A similar trend for the surface areakaolin percentage dependent property was also observed for KAC, but the percentage
contribution of the micropore area to the total surface area has a
different trend. The percentage of micropore increased slightly
from 0 to 20% and then decreased with kaolin loading of >20%.
This is shown in Fig. 4.
An almost linear relationship of surface area to kaolin loading
for KAM indicates that treatment of the mixture at 500 C has no
significant contribution to the surface areas, total or micropore.
The resulting surface areas are merely a simple contribution of
each surface area component of kaolin and activated carbon. Due
to the low micropore surface area of kaolin, its contribution to the
percentage of micropore area of KAM is almost negligible, and
it is therefore dominated by the contribution from the activated
carbon. This is probably why the percentage of micropore is
almost constant up to 80% of kaolin loading.
On the other hand, the resulting total and micropore surface
area of KAC decreased with kaolin loading. Instead of an almost
linear relationship, a slightly downward curve was obtained.
This shows the effect of activationcarbonization of KAC by
2 M sulfuric acid followed by carbonization at 500 C, resulting
in the reduction of the surface area of KAC compared to its
corresponding counterpart, KAM.
FIG. 5. BJH pore size distribution for KAM prepared at various percentages
of kaolin loading (w/w): (a) 100, (b) 80, (c) 60, (d) 40, (e) 20, and (f) 0%.
98
HUSSEIN ET AL.
FIG. 7. Absorption of -carotene on, and its recovery from, KAM and KAC
at various percentages of kaolin loading (w/w). Closed and open symbols are
for KAC and KAM, respectively. Circles are for carotene recovered and squares
are for carotene adsorbed.
the absorbing power of the resulting KAMs and KACs on carotene. These factors were not included in our preliminary
study.
As a result of the adsorption of -carotene on the adsorbents,
we also studied the desorption capability of the -carotene from
the adsorbents. As shown in the figure, desorption is only in
a range of 15% and, in general, desorption decreased as the
loading percentage of kaolin increased for both KAM and KAC.
However, desorption is more favorable as the percentage of activated carbon is higher in the adsorbents.
Peroxide Value
FIG. 6. BJH pore size distribution for KAC prepared at various percentages
of kaolin loading (w/w): (a) 100, (b) 80, (c) 60, (d) 40, (e) 20, and (f) 0%.
FIG. 8. Peroxide value of the resulting RPO as a result of carotene adsorption on KAM and KAC at various percentages of kaolin loading (w/w). Closed
and open symbols are for KAC and KAM, respectively.
99
the adsorbents except the ones prepared using 20 and 40% kaolin
loading. On the other hand, all of the adsorbents show negative
gain for micropore surface area on acid pretreatment, except for
pure kaolin, in which the micropore surface area increased from
2 to 3 m2 /g.
Adsorbents prepared from an activated carbon-rich precursor
show that the micropore surface area is reduced as a result of acid
pretreatment. This is due to a large reduction of micropore area
of pure activated carbon as a result of acid pretreatment, from
940 to 828 m2 /g. Although the micropore area of pure kaolin
has a positive effect on acid pretreatment, a small contribution
of only 3 m2 /g, it results in a negligible contribution to the total
micropore area or the resulting adsorbent.
FIG. 9. Surface area gain (%) as a result of acid pretreatment of the adsorbents prepared at various percentages of kaolin loading (w/w). Closed and open
symbols are for total and micropore surface area, respectively.
[3]
[2]
100
HUSSEIN ET AL.
also used for the PV value of resulting RPO in contact with the
adsorbents prepared with and without acid pretreatment, respectively.
For various kaolin loadings, the percentage of carotene adsorbed was found to be improved with the acid pretreatment
of the adsorbent prior the activationcarbonization process, as
shown in Fig. 7. Figure 10 compares the performance of adsorbents on the acid pretreatment to those without pretreatment.
Carotene adsorption increased in a range of 315%, and the maximum was found for the adsorbent prepared using 40% kaolin
loading. However, the same treatment hindered the ability of the
adsorbed carotene to be desorbed from the adsorbents if 4080%
kaolin loading was used. On the other hand, such a treatment
has a positive effect, i.e., it enhanced the desorption of carotene
if pure activated carbon, kaolin, or a mixture of both with 20%
kaolin loading was used to prepare the adsorbents. Pure kaolin or
activated carbon improved its carotene desorption by acid pretreatment, about 49 and 47%, respectively. Although in terms
of percentage, the increase is quite substantial, the actual value
is only 4.7 and 3.2% removal of carotene for acid pretreated
and untreated, respectively, for activated carbon, compared to
only 1.1 and 0.75%, respectively, for kaolin. This is shown in
Fig. 7.
Except for the adsorbent prepared using 20% kaolin loading,
acid pretreatment of the adsorbent resulting in a higher PV value
of the RPO treated with it by about 25%, as shown in Fig. 10. In
general, this shows that acid pretreatment, produced adsorbents
when in contact with RPO, oxidized it, and hence increased the
PV value.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
1. Hussein, M. Z., Tarmizi, R. S. H., Zainal, Z., Ibrahim, R., and Badri, M.,
Carbon 34, 1447 (1996).
2. Hussein, M. Z., Zainal, Z., Ibrahim, R., Kheong, K. K., and Badri, M.,
J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 64, 35 (1995).
3. Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Lope-Gonzalez, J. de D., and Berenguer, C., Carbon
20, 513 (1982).
4. Lope-Gonzalez, J. de D., Marteninez-Vilchez, F., and Rodriguez-Reinoso,
F., Carbon 18, 413 (1980).
5. Pollard, S. J. T., Sollars, and Perry, R, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 50, 265
(1991).
6. Lee, C. K., Low, K. S., and Chung, L. C., J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 69, 93
(1997).
7. Gee, I. L., Sollars, C. J., Fowler, G., Ouki, S. K., and Perry, R., J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol. 72, 329 (1998).
8. Barret, E. P., Joyner, L. S., and Halenda, P. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 373
(1951).
9. Lin, S. W., Tang, T. S., and Tan, T. A., in PORIM Test Methods: Methods
of Test for Palm Oil and Palm Oil Products, PORIM Publication, Kuala
Lumpur, 1995.