104 visualizações

Enviado por kyle7377

International Finance Practice Problems

- Interest Rate Risk
- syllabus
- soluz 7
- Derivatives
- ch7
- Derivative 30 October 2013 By Mansukh Investment and Trading Solution
- 4.44-BMS-Semester-V-and-VI-Syllabus-to-be-implememnted-2018_2019-3.pdf
- Derivatives Securities
- Derivatives
- Final Report_Currency Hedging - A Trend in India
- Financial Derivaties -Notes
- OCC Report
- Derivative
- Sharekhan - Derivatives Digest
- Risk Neutral Densities A Review.pdf
- Asia Pacific Bond Markets
- OCC Q2 '09
- Derivatives
- Stice SolutionsManual Vol2 Ch19
- Class1 Jose Guedes 1

Você está na página 1de 18

1. The following are balance of payments (BOP) statistics for the United States.

2002 ($000,000)

Goods: exports

Goods: imports

Services: credit

Services: debit

Income: credit

Income: debit

Current transfers: credit

Current transfers: debit

Capital Account: credit

Capital Account: debit

Direct investment abroad

Direct investment in the

USA

Portfolio investment

assets

Portfolio investment

liabilities

Other investment assets

Other investment

liabilities

Net Errors and

Omissions

Reserves and Related

Items

685

1165

289

227

256

260

12

70

1

2

138

40

-16

421

53

246

-47

-4

ii. What is the current account balance?

iii. What is the financial account balance?

iv. Show that the BOP is balanced.

v. Give one example of a transaction that would be recorded under each of the

following:

Income: credit

Capital account: debit

Portfolio investment: liabilities

v. Discuss how a five-year history of a countrys BOP can assist you as the manager

of an MNC or of an international mutual fund in making decisions related to your

managerial functions.

2. You recall that a month ago the U.S. dollar/yen spot exchange rate was

bid $0.008600/ and ask $0.008610/. Today you went to the bank and saw

the following rates being advertised:

Spot

Bid ($/)

0.008805

Ask ($/)

0.008815

30-day forward

60-day forward

0.009025

0.009225

0.009040

0.009275

(2.33% dep) and the yen (2.38% appr), respectively, over the last

month? (Use only the Ask quotes for this computation.)

ii.

What is the annualized 30-day forward premium/discount on the

yen (30.63% prem)? (Use only the Ask quotes for this

computation.)

iii.

What does the forward premium or discount computed in ii. mean?

iv.

What is the percentage bid-ask spread on the 60-day forward?

(0.539%)

Bid and ask quotes on currencies are here: http://www.reuters.com/.

Choose Markets and then Currencies.

i.

transaction that is also called a window contract and has a variable

delivery date.

3. Today you went to the bank and saw the following quotes:

Bid ($/)

Ask ($/)

Spot

0.8695

0.8698

30-day forward

0.8699

0.8704

60-day forward

0.8707

0.8717

You recall that a month ago the spot exchange rate was bid $0.8590/ and

ask $0.8595/.

v.

What is the percentage appreciation/depreciation of the dollar

(1.184% dep) and the euro (1.198% appr) over the last month?

(Use only the Ask quotes for this computation.)

vi.

What is the annualized 30-day forward premium/discount on the

dollar (0.827% disc)? (Use only the Ask quotes for this

computation.)

vii. What is the percentage bid-ask spread on the 60-day forward?

(0.1147%)

viii. Suppose the bank had a bid of 1.15125/$ and an ask of 1.15105.

How would you interpret this quote? (Bank is transacting in the

numerator currency, the euro. Bid is $(1/1.15125)/ or $0.8686/

and ask is $0.8688/)

4. Today you went to the bank and saw the following quotes:

Spot

30-day forward

Bid ($/)

1.4905

1.4975

Ask ($/)

1.4925

1.4995

60-day forward

1.5125

1.5155

You recall that a month ago the spot exchange rate was bid $1.4765/ and

ask $1.4775/.

ix.

What is the percentage appreciation/depreciation of the dollar

(1.0047% dep) and the pound (1.0152% appr) over the last month?

(Use only the Ask quotes for this computation.)

x.

What is the annualized 30-day forward premium/discount on the

dollar (5.6020% disc)? (Use only the Ask quotes for this

computation.)

xi.

What is the percentage bid-ask spread on the 60-day forward?

(0.198%)

xii. Interpret the forward premium or discount computed in ii.

I have a general Question regarding depreciation and appreciation of a

currency. For example in problem 5 Chapter 18 in the book the spot rate is

ringgit3.8000/$ and the ringgit is expected to appreciate by 2%. How do I

calculate the expected exchange rate?

If you MULTIPLY by (1 + expected change) then you are computing either the

appreciation or depreciation of the FOREIGN currency the one under the slash

($).

If you DIVIDE by (1 + expected change) then you are computing either the

appreciation or depreciation of the HOME currency the one above the slash

(Ringgit).

Recall that to find the appreciation/depreciation of the HOME currency

(above slash), you can leave the exchange rate quote as is above and use the

following formula: (beginning ending)/ending.

So this gives: (3.8 ending)/ending = 0.02 (3.8 ending) = ending 0.02 3.8

= ending + ending 0.02 3.8 = ending(1 + 0.02) ending = 3.8/(1 + 0.02)

Note that if the Ringgit was expected to depreciate you would still follow the same

procedure, but set the 0.02 as -0.02, so you would get ending = 3.8/(1 - 0.02).

slash), you can leave the exchange rate quote as is and use the following formula:

(ending beginning)/ beginning.

So if the $ was expected to appreciate by 5% this would be: (ending 3.8)/3.8 =

0.05 (ending 3.8) = 3.80.05 ending = 3.8 + 3.80.05 ending = 3.8(1

+ 0.05)

Note that if the $ was expected to depreciate you would still follow the same

procedure, but set the 0.05 as -0.05, so you would get ending = 3.8(1 - 0.05).

5. On your visit to the bank you also noticed the following rates:

0.6512/$

NOK8.2033/

NOK5.4543/$

i. Is there an arbitrage opportunity? If so, demonstrate clearly how you

can take advantage of it.

By writing the quotes so that each numerator currency cancels out with

itself in the denominator of the three quotes, we should get a product of 1.

There is arbitrage if:

0.6512/$ NOK8.2033/ $0.1833/NOK 1.

NB: [$(1/5.4543)/ NOK = $0.1833/NOK]

The product is equal to 0.9794, which is < 1, indicting there is an arbitrage

opportunity.

Because the product of the exchange rates is less than 1, all three exchange

rates are expected to increase so that their product becomes 1. If the

rates are expected to increase it means the numerator currency in each

quote is expected to depreciate and the denominator currency is expected

to appreciate. You should but the currency expected to appreciate by

selling the one expected to depreciate.

Assuming you are a U.S. resident:

Sell $1m to buy $1mNOK5.4543/$ = NOK5,454,300

Sell NOK to buy NOK5,454,300/ NOK8.2033/ = 664,890.96

Sell to buy 664,890.96/0.6512/$ = $1,021,024.20

You have made a profit of $21,024.20 on $1m or 2.10242% return. This

could have been inferred from the fact that if you had 0.9794 increased to 1,

the return is (1-0.9794)/0.9794 = 2.10%.

NB: The above could also have been done using:

$1.5356/ 0.1219/NOK NOK5.4543/$ = 1.0210 > 1, indicating a 2.10%

profit.

ii. The bank also quoted the dollar against the euro as $0.9050/. What is

the cross rate between the euro and the Norwegian kroner (/NOK)?

6. A local bank has the following quotes:

C$1.6525/$

C$2.4788/

0.6575/$

can take advantage of it.

$0.6051/C$

opportunity

ii. The bank also quoted the yen against the dollar as 125/$. What is the

cross rate between the yen and the Canadian dollar (/C$)?

7. You are quoted the following exchange rates between the U.S. and

Canadian dollars and interest rates in each country:

Current spot:

C$1.4900/$

1-year forward rate:

C$1.5100/$

Canadian interest rate:

5.0%

U.S. interest rate:

7.5%

(Assume that you can borrow or lend at the quoted interest rates.)

i. Is there an opportunity for arbitrage? If so, demonstrate clearly how

you can take advantage of it.

8. You are quoted the following exchange rates between the yen and the

U.S. dollar and interest rates in the U.S. and Japan:

Current spot:

127/$

1-year forward rate:

125/$

Japanese 1-year interest rate:

1.5%

U.S. 1-year interest rate:

5.5%

(Assume that you can borrow or lend at the quoted interest rates.)

i. Is there a covered interest arbitrage opportunity? If so, demonstrate

clearly how you can take advantage of it.

F1h / f (1 i h )

S 0h / f (1 i f )

currency, given the quotes (it does not matter if you invert and make the $

the home currency). This leads to 0.9843 0.9621. The rest is almost like

There is an arbitrage profit if

the above. One side should rise and the other should fall for the two to

become equal. That is, ih is likely to rise and if fall (or the forward rate fall

and spot rate rise).

We could profit if we:

1. Borrow yen and convert to dollars at spot rate

2A. Invest dollars at US interest rate for a year

2B. Forward sell the dollars expected from the US investment (all or part

depending on ones residency) at forward rate to get yen in one year

3. At end of year, deliver dollars to get yen, and repay yen loan to make a

profit

Set the parity condition: Fkr/$/Skr/$ = (1 + ikr)/(1 + i$) (Note that the home currency in

this quote is the kr)

6.1980/6.1720 = (1.0125)/1.0075)

1.0042 1.0050

For parity to be restored, the two sides are expected to change so they become equal. One

way for this to happen is to have the LEFT side go up and/or the RIGHT side go down.

1.0042 = 1.0050

Suppose we focus on the RIGHT (interest rates) side only. If the right side is expected to go

down, then it means the Danish interest rate (ikr in the above formula) is expected to go

down or i$ is expected to go up.

The investment strategy here is to borrow now in the interest rate expected to go up later

and invest now in the interest rate which is expected to go down later. The intuition is, if

you must borrow, do it now and lock in the current lower rates and if you must invest, do it

now and lock in current high rates. In either case you are better off than waiting until

either rate changes.

[Note you cant exploit the IRP arbitrage without borrowing and investing and locking in

your gains in the forward currency market, so nothing comes out of your own pocket.]

This tells you to borrow $ now, as the rates are low now compared to the future, convert to

kr at the current spot rate, and invest the proceeds in kr interest rate securities.

1.

Convert $5m to kr

$5,000,000 x kr6.1720/$

= kr30,860,000

2.

Invest/deposit/lend kr at Danish interest rate for 90 days kr30,860,000 x

1.0125 = kr31,245, 750

3.

Simultaneously, sell kr forward to get $ in 90 days forward rate locked in

= kr6.1980/$

4.

= $5,041,263.31

5.

Profit earned

= $41,263.31

6.

Profit greater than if you invested directly in $ $5,000,000 x 1.0075

= $5,037,500

The IRP says that, investing in the dollar interest-earning security should give you the same

pay-off as investing in the foreign currency interest-earning security, because the higher

interest rate in the Denmark should lead to a depreciation of the Danish krone by just the

difference in interest rates. This would make the alternatives of $ or kr investments the

same.

and which to lend/invest in:

a. look at the differences in the annual interest rates, [home rate minus foreign rate]

5 3 = 2% [annualized]

b. note that the currency with the higher interest rate [kr] is expected to have a forward

discount (or depreciate) over the life of the forward contract (or over the time that the

uncovered position is being held for) by the same percent difference in interest rate [2%

annualized]

c. compute the annualized forward discount (or depreciation) of the currency with the

higher interest rate

you need to compute the forward discount of the home currency one above the slash

[(F$/kr - S$/kr )/ S$/kr ]x 360/n =

[(0.1613 0.1620)/0.1620]*360/90 = -0.01678 or -1.678%.

Or use this formula to compute forward discount for the currency above the slash [(Skr/$

- Fkr/$)/Fkr/$ ]x 360/90

=

[(6.1720 6.1980)/6.1980]*360/90 = -0.01678 or -1.678%.

d. if interest rate difference is greater than the forward discount, then invest/lend in the

securities denominated in the currency with the higher interest rate because you will gain

more from the higher interest rate than you will lose from the depreciation of that

currency, leading to a net gain above what you could earn from investing in your own

countrys securities.

Since 2% interest rate difference is greater than the 1.678% forward discount, then

investing in kr securities will give you 2 percentage points more in interest (compared to

the 3% from investing in same securities in the U.S.) and that will not be offset by the 1.678

percentage points that you will lose because you have to convert from the weaker kr to the

$ in 90 days.

engage in uncovered interest arbitrage. The proceeds are invested in Mexican

money market securities at an annual rate of 9.00%. The spot rate at the time of

the loan was P10.1525/$. If a year later the spot rate is P11.3230/$, what is his

profit/loss?

10. Suppose that the current spot rate between the Mexican peso and the

U.S. dollar is MP10/$. Over the next year the rate of inflation in Mexico is

expected to be 12% and in the U.S. it is expected to be 3%.

i.

exchange rate (MP/$) would you expect one year from today?

ii.

accurate but the actual spot rate is MP12/$. Has the Mexican peso

experienced a real appreciation or depreciation, and how

much?

11. Suppose that the spot rate between the Jamaican dollar and the U.S.

dollar a year ago was J$45/$. Today the spot rate is J$40/$. During the year

the rate of inflation in Jamaica was 8% and in the U.S. it was 3%.

iii.

Given the difference in inflation rates, one year ago what exchange

rate (J$/$) would you have predicted for today?

Using the RPPP formula that links expected spot rate to inflation

differential, the expected real or PPP exchange rate at time t (in this case t

= 1) is

S

h/ f

t

h/ f

0

(1 i h ) t

1.08

J $45 / $

J $47.1845 / $ .

f t

1.03

(1 i )

because with higher inflation rate in Jamaica the J$ should depreciate

against the US$. Note that this is different from the actual rate, which

J$40/$.

iv.

($/J$) during the year?

S1h / f (1 i f )

1.

appreciation/depreciation of the foreign currency is h / f

S0

(1 i h )

To find the appreciation/depreciation of the J$, we can use the above

formula by making the J$ the foreign currency in the quote (i.e., $/J$). This

we do by inverting the quotes to get S 0 = $0.0222/J$ and S1 = $0.0250/J$.

Plugging into the formula, we get

0.0250 (1.08)

1

0.0222 (1.03)

against the U.S. dollar. Note how different this is from the expected

depreciation. This implies that the J$ is overvalued, making Jamaican

exports not competitive in the U.S.

You should also note that this is different from the nominal appreciation of

the J$. When the rate is written as $/J$ the appreciation/depreciation of the

S1$ / J $ S 0$ / J $

J$ is:

.

S 0$ / J $

This gives {(0.025 - 0.0222)/0.0222} = 12.61% nominal appreciation of the

J$.

12. Sony produces LED+ TVs and exports them to the United States. Over the last

year the exchange rate was 90/$ and Sony charged 74,250 per DVD player. The

forecast for the coming year is for Japanese inflation of 3% and U.S. inflation of 7%.

Suppose Sony wishes to pass-through only 85% of any exchange rate changes to

its U.S. customers, what would be the new dollar price of the DVD player?

13. You are asked to use the futures market to hedge an expected cash

obligation of (Australian dollars) A$150m due on December 17, 2001. The

current spot rate is $0.6500/A$. The size of the futures contract is

A$100,000 and the price of the futures contract that expires on December

17 is $0.6650/A$.

i.

Should you buy or sell the futures contracts and how many?

ii.

$0.6735/A$?

Profit A$150,000,000*[$0.6735/A$ - $0.6650/A$] = $1,275,000

14. To hedge your Australian dollar obligation you decided to consider the

use of options. Suppose you observed that the December delivery Call

option has a 0.35 cents premium, while the Put has a 1.55 cents premium.

Both have an exercise price of $0.6635/A$ and a contract size of A$50,000.

The current spot rate is $0.6500/A$.

i.

Should you buy or sell the Call or the Put in order to hedge?

ii.

$0.6735/A$?

Profit = A$150,000,000*($0.6735/A$

$975,000

[$0.6635/A$+$0.0035/A$]) =

15a. On October 15, you were asked to hedge an expected cash inflow of

$15m Canadian dollars to be received on December 17, the delivery date of

the December futures contract for Canadian dollars on the CME. The

current spot rate is $0.5756/C$ and the current Canadian dollar futures

price for December delivery is $0.5872/C$. The Canadian dollar futures

contract is for C$100,000.

iii.

Should you have bought or sold futures contracts, and how many,

in order to hedge?

iv.

What is your profit or loss on the futures contracts if on December

17 the spot rate is $0.6082?

15b. Suppose the initial and maintenance margins on the Canadian

dollar futures are $1,500 and $1,100 per contract, respectively. Assume

that after hedging the futures closed at $0.5778 on the first day and then at

$0.5915 on the following day. Show the changes to the margin account,

indicating if there was a margin call and how much was it. (This can be

done using only one contract.)

16. A. 1. i. You will borrow $25m in 3 months time for a term of 6 months. The

loan rate will be LIBOR6+250 basis points. LIBOR6 is currently 2.5%. You enter

into a forward rate agreement (FRA) at a forward rate of 2.5%. If in three months

LIBOR6 is 1.5%, clearly show your net position from combining the FRA with the

loan.

ii. From part i, suppose the 6-month Eurodollar interest rate futures at the time

was 97.30. Should you buy or sell futures contracts to hedge? Clearly show your

net position from combining the Eurodollar futures and the loan.

B.i. You will borrow $10m in 3 months time for a term of 3 months. The

loan rate will be LIBOR3+150 basis points. LIBOR3 is currently 3.5%. You

enter into a forward rate agreement (FRA) at a forward rate of 3.5%. If in

three months LIBOR3 is 5.25%, explain fully how a FRA helped you.

Your concern is that LIBOR will increase at the time you lock in the rate in

three months time, resulting in a higher interest payment on the loan. So

you want to buy the FRA so that if LIBOR increases you get rewarded with a

cash inflow to use to partly offset the higher interest payment on the loan.

If LIBOR3 settles at 5.25% in three months your loan rate with the bank is

5.25 + 1.50 = 6.75%. For a 3-month loan the interest payment is:

$10,000,000*0.0675*(90/360) = $168,750.

10

By choosing a forward rate of 3.5% you are trying to obtain an effective loan

rate of 3.5 + 1.5 = 5.0%. If LIBOR settles at more than 3.5% when you are

ready to take the loan you will obtain a payoff from the FRA equal to:

FRA payoff = $10,000,000*[0.0525 0.035]*(90/360)

1+ (0.0525*(90/360))

= $43,183.

This is the PV today of the payoff from the FRA which occurs in three

months time at the date that you get the loan. Its value in the three

months time when you get the loan is $43,750.

Hence, considering the inflows from the FRA in three months, your net

interest payment is $125,000. This is what you would have paid if you got

the loan at 3.5% + 1.5%, the rates you lock in with the FRA.

ii. From part i, suppose the 3-month Eurodollar interest rate futures at

the time were 96.30. Should you buy or sell futures contracts to hedge?

Explain how the Eurodollar futures helped you.

Since you fear an increase in interest rates are going to increase your loan

cost, you need to hedge in the interest rate futures market in such a way

that if interest rates do increase in the future you get an inflow of cash

(profit) so that you can use it to partly offset the higher rate you would pay

on the loan.

So, you need to SELL futures contracts today. If interest rates increase later

the contracts lose value and so you can buy them back cheaper and make a

profit.

The interest rate implied by the futures contract is 100 96.3 = 3.70%.

The price of $10,000,000 of contracts today is: $10,000,000 *[1 - .

037*(90/360)] = $9,907,500.

At expiration the spot interest rate is the same as the futures interest rate.

If this rises to 5.25% then the value of the futures contract will fall (price

and interest rates move inversely for fixed income securities).

The new price is: $10,000,000 *[1 - .0525*(90/360)] = $9,868,750. You will

buy the contract at this price and by doing so discharge the legal obligation

imposed on you when you sold the futures. Your profit in the futures market

(not considering brokers commission, initial margin, and margin call) is

$9,907,500 - $9,868,750 = $38, 750. This will be used to partially offset the

higher loan cost.

11

swap to receive U.S. dollars and pay euros. The notional principal is $16m.

This is a nonamortizing swap with payments made once per year at year

end. The current spot rate is $1.6000/ and the swap rates are U.S. dollar

2.85% and euro 4.00%. What are the dollar and euro cash flows from the

swap over the life of the swap?

ii. Suppose CanTech decides to unwind the swap after one year when the

spot rate is $1.5825/ and the one-year swap rates are U.S. dollar 3.05%

and euro 4.05%. Compute the NPV of the swap and indicate who receives

payment.

18. CanTech Inc. entered into a three-year cross-currency interest rate

swap to receive U.S. dollars and pay pounds. The notional principal is

$45m. This is a nonamortizing swap with payments made once per year at

year end. The current spot rate is $1.5000/ and the swap rates are U.S.

dollar 1.85% and pound 2.05%.

i. What are the dollar and pound cash flows from the swap over the life of

the swap?

ii. CanTech decides to unwind the swap after one year when the spot rate is

$1.4850/ and the two-year swap rates are: U.S. dollar - 1.95% and British

pound - 2.30%.

Compute the NPV of the swap and indicate who receives payment.

At the end of one year there are two remaining payments in the currency

swap and these have to be used in computing the PVs:

[$832,500/(1+0.0195) + $45,832,500/(1+0.0195) 2]

[615,000*($1.4850/)/(1+0.0230) +

30,615,000*($1.4850/)/(1+0.0230)2]

19. i. International Freights, Inc. can directly access floating rate funds at

LIBOR + 2% and fixed-rate funds at 7%. It has a preference for a fixed-rate

loan. Zylan Foods, which prefers a floating-rate loan, has access to

fixed-rate funds at 5% and floating-rate funds at LIBOR + .75%. A swap

bank can arrange an interest rate swap for 25 basis points on a notional

principal of $10 million and International Freights and Zylan Foods would

split any remaining cost savings equally. Explain clearly if they can benefit

from a swap, the loans each should take, the payments each will make, and

net loan cost for each. (10 points)

12

presently has access to floating interest rate funds at LIBOR+1.25%. Its

direct borrowing cost is 11% in the fixed-rate bond market. In contrast,

company Y, which prefers a floating-rate loan, has access to fixed-rate funds

in the Eurodollar bond market at 9% and floating-rate funds at

LIBOR+0.25%. A swap bank can arrange a swap for 10 basis points on a

notional principal of $50 million and X and Y would split any remaining cost

savings equally. Explain if they can benefit from an interest rate swap, the

loans each should take, the payments each will make, and net loan cost for

each.

Y has absolute advantage in both the fixed and floating rate markets, but

has comparative advantage in the fixed rate market because it can borrow

at 2 percentage points lower than X (11 9), compared to only 1 percentage

point (LIBOR + 1.25 (LIBOR + 0.25)). Hence there is an opportunity to

benefit from a swap.

The amount to be shared is 1 percentage point [(11 9) - (LIBOR + 1.25

(LIBOR + 0.25))].

So, the 100 basis points will be split as follows: 10 points for the swap bank,

45 points for X, and 45 points for Y.

Y, with the comparative advantage in the fixed rate market will borrow at

the fixed rate of 9% even though it prefers floating rate.

<<<< This means that Y will have an obligation to pay 9% to the lender. It

swaps to have that paid by someone else.

X, has a comparative advantage in the floating rate market and will borrow

at the floating rate of LIBOR + 1.25%.

<<<< This means that X will have an obligation to pay LIBOR + 1.25% to

the lender. It swaps to have that paid by someone else.

They will then swap the above loan payments. That is, they will receive the

above payments and end up paying the loan they prefer.

You should then get a net borrowing rate for X as 11 0.45 = 10.55.

<<< This is the best rate it could borrow on its own in the market it prefers

(fixed) minus the benefit from the swap.

13

You should then get a net borrowing rate for Y as LIBOR +0.25 0.45 =

LIBOR 0.20%.

<<< This is the best rate it could borrow on its own in the market it prefers

(floating) minus the benefit from the swap.

Follow the example done in class to draw the flows with the swap bank in

the middle.

21. The Land's Beginning Company Inc. (LBC), located in Seattle, imports extreme

condition outdoor wear and equipment from The Hudson Bay Company (HBC)

located in Canada. With the steady decline of the U.S dollar against the Canadian

dollar LBC is finding a continued relationship with HBC to be an increasingly

difficult proposition. In response to LBC's request, HBC has proposed the following

currency risk-sharing arrangement. First, set the current spot rate of

C$1.2000/$ as the base rate. As long as spot rate stays within 5% (up or down)

LBC will pay at the base rate. Any rate outside of the 5% range, HBC will share

equally with LBC the difference between the spot rate and the base rate.

i. Given the current spot rate is C$1.2000/$, what are the upper and lower limits

for trading to take place at C$1.2000?

ii. If LBC has a payable of C$100,000 due today and the current spot rate is

C$1.1250/$, how much does LBC owe in U.S. dollars?

22. Du Pont has entered into a currency risk sharing arrangement with

British Gas. Under the contract, Du Pont agrees to pay British Gas a base

price of $10 million for gas purchases, but the parties would share the

currency risk equally beyond a neutral zone, specified as a band of

exchange rates: $1.67/-1.73/. Within the neutral zone, Du Pont must pay

BG the pound equivalent of $10 million at the base rate of $1.70/.

Suppose the spot rate at the time of payment is $1.63/. How much will Du

Pont owe British Gas?

Amount owed in f.c. at base rate = ($10,000,000/($1.70/ )) = 5,882,352.94. This

amount to the party receiving the funds will not change if the rate is within the

zone when payment is due.

This could cost the payer between 5,882,352.94*$1.67/ = $9,823,529.41 and

5,882,352.94*$1.73/ = $10,176,470.59 within the zone.

Now that the spot rate is $1.63/, Du Pont alone would benefit from the

With the risk-sharing arrangement the gain is shared between both parties.

The gain to Du Pont, which they will have to share, is the difference

between the bottom of the range and the current low spot rate: $1.67/ -

14

$1.68/. That is, that which would have to be paid if the exchange rates remain

relatively stable and kept within the range less half the gain.

The f.c. amount owed and to be paid to BG under the risk sharing arrangement is:

$10,000,000/(1.70-(0.5*(1.67-1.63))) = 5,952,380.95. This will cost, at the

current spot rate, 5,952,380.95*$1.63/ = $9,702,380.95

NB: Student question highlighted; my answers in red or blue and not

highlighted.

Could you please clarify the effective rate calculation in # 22 of the Practice

Questions?

Effective rate = base rate + 0.5*(current spot rate lower bound rate)

The new risk-sharing rate = (1.70 + (0.5*(1.63-1.67))) = $1.68/

Note that the above is mathematically equivalent to (1.70-(0.5*(1.67-1.63))),

the answer in PQ # 21 above, but it is presented like I did it in class. The

way I did it in class is preferred, even if the books test bank does it

differently.

But in class you said that if we have a base rate the calculation would be:

Effective Rate = Base Rate + 0.5(Spot Rate Base Rate)

However, PQ #22 is using:

Effective Rate = Base Rate + 0.5(Spot Rate Lower Bound Rate)

I understand the mathematical equivalence between both methods. What Im

confused with is the fact that in class you mentioned that if we were given a base

rate, we should use it instead of any upper or lower bound rate. Hence, shouldnt it

be:

Effective Rate = Base + [0.5*(Spot Base)]

Why does the formula that the PQ uses to solve #22 mixes the Base Rate and the

Lower Rate?

Effective Rate = Base + [0.5*(Spot Lower)]

15

question?

There is no preferred method. The method depends on the question asked

or, more specifically, on the information given about the contract.

In the PQs #22 it says:

the parties would share the currency risk equally beyond a neutral zone,

specified as a band of exchange rates: $1.67/-1.73/.

This implies using the upper or lower bound as appropriate to make the

adjustment to the base rate, just as you point out above that it does.

Note also for this contract that if the rate falls within the neutral zone, Du

Pont must pay BG using a fixed exchange rate (the base rate) of $1.70/.

Now look at chapter 12 # 5 and see what it says:

However, if the spot rate at the time of the shipment falls outside of this +/- 5%

range, Morris Garage will share equally the difference between the actual spot

rate and the base rate. This is what we did in class and is expressed in your first

formula above.

Note also that this contract says that if the spot rate falls in the +/ 5% range the

actual spot rate is used.

These are two different contracts. This is what I was saying in class that it

depends on the contract.

23. In December your firm had an obligation of CHF8 million due in June, around

the expiration date of the June futures and options contracts. You were asked to

hedge exchange rate risk and you gathered the following information.

DECEMBER

a. Spot exchange rate was (S0): $0.9000/CHF.

b. 180-day forward (F180) quotes for the Swiss francs: $0.9268 - 72/CHF.

c. Eurocurrency rates from a local bank

Term

6-month borrowing rate

6-month deposit rate

U.S. dollar

4.00% p.a.

3.90% p.a.

Swiss francs

1.05% p.a.

0.95% p.a.

16

CHF125,000 and the roundturn commission was $12.50 per contract.

e. The strike price and premiums for options expiring in June were as follows:

Strike

Call

Put

Option strike and premium

9000

4.50

1.50

JUNE

f. At the option and futures expiration date in June the spot exchange rate was

$0.9600/CHF.

i. If you hedged using the futures market, did you buy or sell? What was your

overall position considering both the spot and futures market transactions in June?

ii. The futures broker had asked for an initial margin of $1,000 per contract and

requires a maintenance margin of $850. You recall that on the first day at the

close the futures settle price was $.9125/CHF. At the close on the second day, it

was $0.9005/CHF. Show the transactions and balances related to the margin

account, indicating if there was a margin call and the amount.

iii. If you hedged using the forward market, did you buy or sell Swiss francs, what

was your net cost?

iv. If you hedged using the options market, did you use calls or puts and what was

your net cost?

v. Demonstrate the money market hedge, stating the amount of domestic currency

you paid for the foreign currency obligation. What exchange rate did you lock in?

24. A U.S. firm exports today to a British company for 100,000. The current

exchange rate is $2.03/, the account is payable in three months, and the firm

chooses to avoid any hedging techniques designed to reduce or eliminate the risk

of changes in the exchange rate. If the exchange rate changes to $2.01/ on the

day of the payment, how is the firm affected?

25. Tampa Juices Inc. has just borrowed 1,000,000 to make improvements to an

Italian fruit plantation and processing plant. If the interest rate is 7.00% per year

and the euro depreciates against the dollar from $1.15/ at the time the loan was

made to $1.10/ at the end of the first year, what is the before-tax cost of capital

if the firm repays the entire loan plus interest (rounded)? (

2.35%)

26. Tampa Juices Inc., a U.S.-based firm, has just borrowed 1,000,000 to make

improvements to an Italian fruit plantation and processing plant. Suppose the

interest rate is 7.00% per year and the exchange rate changes from $1.15/ at the

time the loan was made to $1.20/ at the end of the first year.

i. What is the before-tax cost of capital if the firm repays the entire loan plus

interest? (11.65%)

ii. Tropical Fruits Inc. is in the 30% marginal tax bracket. What is the after-tax

cost of capital if the firm repays the entire loan plus interest? (8.16%)

17

18

- Interest Rate RiskEnviado pormailinh1991
- syllabusEnviado porSantosh Sunny
- soluz 7Enviado porAngates1
- DerivativesEnviado porsshreyas
- ch7Enviado porMohd Shahid Shams
- Derivative 30 October 2013 By Mansukh Investment and Trading SolutionEnviado porMansukh Investment & Trading Solutions
- 4.44-BMS-Semester-V-and-VI-Syllabus-to-be-implememnted-2018_2019-3.pdfEnviado porsharique khan
- Derivatives SecuritiesEnviado porFOuadHasan
- DerivativesEnviado pornikitsharma
- Final Report_Currency Hedging - A Trend in IndiaEnviado porVikram Singh Bisht
- Financial Derivaties -NotesEnviado porVaibhav Badgi
- OCC ReportEnviado porqtipx
- DerivativeEnviado porRaghuram Seshabhattar
- Sharekhan - Derivatives DigestEnviado porpankajparimal
- Risk Neutral Densities A Review.pdfEnviado porAnonymous 3NPu0MK
- Asia Pacific Bond MarketsEnviado porTemporus Angst
- OCC Q2 '09Enviado porNathan Martin
- DerivativesEnviado porGouri Shankar Sharma
- Stice SolutionsManual Vol2 Ch19Enviado porJames Domini Lopez Labiano
- Class1 Jose Guedes 1Enviado porJosé Ferreira
- uNKNOWN NOTESEnviado porWaqar A
- Tables of Content of the ProjectEnviado porShiv Gowda
- UntitledEnviado poreurolex
- creditcip_main.pdfEnviado porsunil.teluja1643
- ustreasuriesantitrust--quinncomplaintEnviado porReutersLegal
- AG Agribusiness 2011-01prEnviado pormbamoney14
- Government Bond Futures (Nasdaq)Enviado porJamesMc1144
- Jobswire.com Resume of frankliskovecEnviado porapi-31120462
- History+of+DerivativesEnviado porHarish Mittal
- The Libor is the Average Interest Rate That Leading Banks in London Charge When Lending to Other BanksEnviado porbodhraj91

- Survey of neural networksEnviado porMaria Claudia R
- Long Term Production SchedulingEnviado porHamid Kor
- National Mockboard Exam 2014 - P2 - CopyEnviado porThea Kimberly Oamil
- Module 04Enviado porbrojas35
- Decision Analysis Tutorial 1Enviado porAAAAA
- ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION OF A FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM pdf report.pdfEnviado porvatsalparikh191991
- Working Capital Problem SolutionEnviado porMahendra Chouhan
- Has Google Stock Price Been ManipulatedEnviado porbelgreen
- ManuRetire Secure (English)Enviado porAndrew Pea Shew Ther
- Leif Andersen - Extended Libor Market Models with Stochastic Volatility.pdfEnviado porChun Ming Jeffy Tam
- Black-Hills/Colorado-Elec.Utility-Co.-LP-Tariffs,-Rules-and-RegulationsEnviado porGenability
- Paying Not to Go to the GymEnviado porShaark Lam
- DGM - A deep learning algorithm for solving partial diﬀerential equations.pdfEnviado porVince
- Singular Perturbations in Option PricingEnviado porTu Shirota
- OFD Question PapersEnviado porLeo Deepak
- Determination of Forward and Futures PricesEnviado porKira D. Portgas
- introduction_to_the_economics_and_mathematics_of_financial_markets-cvitanic_and_zapatero_the_mit.pdfEnviado porrahmat48
- Sprint AgreementEnviado porAnonymous RadSWG3ky
- Master Trading JournalEnviado porsrinivas_urv
- Technical Corrections Act of 1982 (PL 97-448)Enviado porTax History
- Option to PurchaseEnviado porAlberta Real Estate
- ashish SMEnviado porAshish Lakwani
- MGT411-Latest Solved MCQS by MeEnviado porWaqas Sherwani
- 2014 Financial Statements EnEnviado porpros_868
- Path Integral Methods for Parabolic Partial Differential Equations With Examples From Computational FinanceEnviado porPecu Tsai
- Strategic PlanningEnviado porMaharjanShyam
- Predrag Rajsic - CV - November 2016Enviado porPredrag Rajšić
- Put & Call option.pdfEnviado porjmlokillo
- Watertown housing studyEnviado porWatertown Daily Times
- TD Discount Brokerage BrochureEnviado porKayne Justine