Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Efficiency wages are wages that are higher than the market
equilibrium. Firms that pay efficiency wagescould lower their
TERMS
shirking
To provide less quality work than is required.
turnover
The number of times a worker is replaced after leaving.
Give us feedback on this content:
Efficiency-Wage Theory
The market-clearing wage is the wage at which supply
equals demand; there is no excess supply of labor (unemployment)
and no excess demand for labor (labor shortage). In the
basic economic theory, in the long run the economy will achieve this
market-clearing equilibrium and will experience the natural level of
unemployment. Some economists, however, argue that a real wage
that achieves equilibrium in the labor market may never be reached.
They suggest that firms may intentionally pay a wage greater than
the market equilibrium. Such firms could hire additional workers at
a lower wage, but they choose not to do so. The idea that firms may
hold to a real wage greater than the equilibrium wage is called
efficiency-wage theory.
than the workers with jobs, find themselves closed out of the
market.
Specifically, there are several theories of why managers might pay
efficiency wages:
shirking .
Minimizing turnover: As mentioned above, by paying abovemarket wages, the worker's motivation to leave the job and look for
a job elsewhere will be reduced. This strategy makes sense when it
is expensive to train replacement workers.
Chapter 8
THE ISLM MODEL
The labour supply refers to the total number of hours that labour
is willing and able to supplyat a given wage rate.
This is because, as wages rise, other workers enter this industry attracted
by the incentive of higher rewards. They may have moved from other
occupations or they may not have previously held a job, such as
housewives or the unemployed.
Where jobs require specific skills and training, the labour supply will be
more inelastic because it is hard to expand the workforce in a short period
of time when demand for workers has increased.
Labour
Chapter 12
Section 1: Fiscal Policy
Macroeconomics - Unit 6
Definition of Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy is a government's attempt to change economic activity by changing
government expenditures, taxation and borrowing, and lending policies. A government
can choose to change spending on highways, defense, education, public works, and
social programs. A government can change tax rates, tax systems, and taxation to
certain groups. If a government spends more than it receives in tax revenue, it borrows
the difference.
Keynesian Economics and Fiscal Policy
The two policies that governments can use to influence the economy are fiscal policy and
monetary policy. Fiscal policy is covered in this unit. Monetary policy is covered in Unit 9.
Keynes supported both policies, but believed that fiscal policy is more effective. According to
Keynes, governments should primarily increase spending when the economy experiences a
recessionary gap. He stated that governments can also lower taxes to stimulate the economy,
but he preferred increases in government spending because governments spend all of their
money whereas citizens may save part of their tax benefits. Conversely, governments should
decrease spending and/or raise taxes when the economy experiences an inflationary gap.
Many politicians, influenced by Keynes's encouragement to run deficits to stimulate the
economy, support active fiscal policy. Since Keynesian economics became popular in the
1930s and beyond, government spending has increased significantly. Politicians often cater to
special interest groups, because it translates into more votes and possible campaign
donations. Consequently, government spending often increases even during expansions.
Classical Economics and Fiscal Policy
Classical economists and supporters of classical schools of thought (for example, neo-classical
and Austrian economists), disagree with Keynesian fiscal policy. According to classical
economists, efforts to change the demand side of the economy may benefit an economy in
the short run, but causes harm in the long run. Increases in government spending lead to
increases in the money supply, or increases in a nation's debt, or increases in taxation.
Increases in the money supply equate to inflation. Increases in interest rates lead to
decreases in borrowing and decreases in private spending. And increases in taxation lead to
decreases in private consumption and savings.
Keynes argued that a rapidly growing economy during times of full employment causes
inflation. Classical economists disagree. They believe that increases in the money supply
equate to inflation, and long-term increases in the price level are impossible without increases
in the money supply. Classical economists, and in particular the so-called monetarists, believe
that inflation can be slowed or avoided by decreasing the rate of growth in the money supply.
Classical economists do not believe that active fiscal policy is beneficial to the economy in the
long run.
According to the classical school, proper fiscal policy is when the government creates an
economic environment in which private properties are well-protected, and households and
businesses have maximum incentive to produce and innovate. Government spending should
be limited to defense, a judicial system, fire and police protection, infrastructure, education,
transportation and a small and efficient administrative system. Taxes should be relatively low
and regulations minimal.
Fiscal Policy Lags
In addition to the long-run disadvantages of active fiscal policy mentioned in the previous
paragraph, neo-classical economists and monetarists believe that lags in the economy
hamper the effectiveness of government policy. There are three lags: the information lag,
the policy lag, and the impact lag.
The information lag is the period of time during which the economy changes and economists
find out that it changes. For example, if in March of this year the economy slows down,
economists may not receive accurate data to determine the slowdown until June of this year.
The policy lag is the period of time during which the information is received and politicians
come to a decision to take action. If the information about the slowdown is received in June, it
may be January of the following year before politicians change fiscal policy (increase
government spending and/or decrease taxes).
The impact lag is the period of time during which politicians have taken action and the impact
of the action is actually felt in the economy. If politicians took action in January, the impact
may not be felt until April or May.
The three lags combined means that it may take approximately 13 or 14 months from the
beginning of the slowdown until fiscal policy takes effect. At that time, the economy may have
already begun an expansion on its own, and the policy may be counter-effective. This is
another reason why classical, neo-classical, and monetarist economists support limited
government involvement in the economy.
iscretionary fiscal expenditures are changes in government spending and taxation that
need specific approval from Congress and the President. Examples include increases in
spending on roads, bridges, stadiums, and other public works. Because discretionary
fiscal policy is subject to the lags discussed in the last section, its effectiveness is often
criticized. Automatic stabilizers, on the other hand, do not need government approval
and take effect immediately.
Automatic Stabilizers
Automatic stabilizers are changes in government spending and taxation that
do not need approval by Congress or the President. Automatic stabilizers are expense and
taxation items that are part of existing economic programs.