Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Insurance is the pooling of fortuitous losses by transfer of such
risks to insures, who agree to provide other pecuniary benefits on their
occurrence, or to render services connected with the risk. It is the
transfer of financial responsibility for the risk at the point of
However,
rural area, where only LIC exists. Service provided by LIC is found
to be less effective than private insurers in all cases.
Generally, people think that insurance in necessary for
everybody and but sometimes people of urban area like to have
more freedom on their investment decisions. People of rural area
want to be insured to get risk-cover of life and to make some
savings.
A Brief of the suggestions given by the researchers to the
company is as follows:
The life insurance companies have to calculate Human Life
Value (HLV) for everybody to know the net worth of insurance
policy that can be given to the individuals before selling any policy.
Since, rural population is more in India; the company should
concentrate equally to rural and urban population. More reputation
is needed for the company, as insurance policies are sold only on
reliability.
Advertisement can not sell insurance policies but through
advertisement people would be aware of the companys existence
which, in turn, would bring reliability, popularity, belief in peoples
mind.
Word of Mouth plays a great role in insurance industry, so
company has to give ultimate satisfaction to the existing customers
in order to retain them and get some more customers through them
Research shows that 30 years is the age range when people
should take insurance policies. Company should target this agegroup as this group people generally have money in hand and no
idea to invest their money.
So, as the face of life insurance in India is changing, with the
changes come a host of challenges, and it is only the credible
players with a long-term vision and a robust business strategy can
make an impact. Whatever the developments, the future of this
industry will surely be exciting.
2.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Risk Management today has become a very complex and demanding
profession.
before. Increasingly they are being asked to manage both risk and
opportunities with an eye on improving shareholder value.
The probability of something happening which is not going to have
favorable effect on its environment can be termed as risk. More the
probability higher the risk. Since the risk itself depends upon the
happening of a future event, one cannot assure himself that risk can be
entirely eliminated.
unfavorable event; every enterprise tries to manage the risk so that its
impact may be minimized in case of happening of that event. Risk is a
burden not only to the individual but to the society as well. There exist
several techniques of meeting the problem of risk, of which insurance is
the most practical method for handling major risks. The commission
on Insurance Terminology of the American Risk and Insurance
Association has defined Insurance as follows:
HISTORY OF INSURANCE
The roots of insurance might be traced to Babylonia, where traders
were encouraged to assume the risks of the caravan trade through loans
that were repaid (with interest) only after the goods had arrived safely-a
practice resembling bottomry and given legal force in the Code of
Hammurabi (c.2100b.c).
With the growth of towns and trade in Europe, the medieval guilds
undertook to protect their members from loss by fire and shipwreck,
and to provide decent burial and support in sickness and poverty. By
the middle of the 14th century, as evidenced by the earliest known
insurance contract (Genoa, 1347), marine insurance was practically
universal among the maritime nations of Europe. In London, Lloyds
Coffee House (1688) was a place where merchants, ship owners, and
underwriters met to transact business. By the end of the 18 th century
Lloyds had progressed into one of the first modern insurance
companies. In 1693, the astronomer Edmond Halley constructed the
first mortality table, based on the statistical laws of mortality and
compound interest. The table corrected in the year 1756 by Joseph
Dodson, made it possible to scale the premium rate to age; previously
the rate had been the same for all ages.
Insurance developed rapidly with the growth of British commerce in
the 17th and 18th century. Prior to the formation of corporations devoted
solely to the business of writing insurance, policies were signed by a
number of individuals, each of whom wrote his name and the amount
of risk he was assuming underneath the insurance proposal, hence the
term underwriter. The first stock companies to engage in insurance
sponsored (1759) the first life insurance corporation in America, for the
benefit of Presbyterian ministers and their dependents. After 1840,
with the decline of religious prejudice against the practice, life
insurance entered a boom period.
classifying risks began.
The New York fire of 1835 called attention to the need for adequate
reserves to meet unexpectedly large losses; Massachusetts was the first
state to require companies by law (1837) to maintain such reserves.
The great Chicago fire (1871) emphasized the costly nature of fires in
structurally dense modern cities. Reinsurance, whereby losses are
distributed among many companies, was devised to meet such
situations and is now common in other lines of insurance. The
Workmens Compensation Act of 1897 in Britain required employers to
insure their employees against industrial accidents. Public liability
insurance, fostered by legislation, made its appearance in the 1880s; it
attained major importance with advent of the automobile.HISTORY OF
INSURANCE IN INDIA
The Indian Insurance Industry is as old as it is in any other part of the
world. India had a number of foreign and Indian insurers operating in
the Indian market till the nationalization of the industry took place. In
the year 1818, the first of the insurance companies, Oriental Life
Insurance Company, was started by Europeans in India at Kolkata. In
1870, the first Indian Insurance Company, Bombay Mutual Life
Insurance was established.
Life Insurance
Nationalization has lent the industry solidity, growth and reach which is
un-paralleled. However, along with these achievements there also grew
a feeling of insensitivity to the needs of the market, tardiness in
adoption of modern practices to upgrade the public that the insurance
industry was not fully responsive to customer needs.
In April 1993, Government set up a high power committee headed by
Mr. R.N.Malhotra to suggest reforms in the insurance sector to make it
more efficient and competitive. Also, it was a hope of the committee
that such a broad basing of the industry will ensure a better penetration
of the insurance market of the country in terms of the Gross Domestic
Product, which remains at very low level in comparison to some of the
developing countries. The committee recommended the establishment
of a strong and effective insurance regulatory authority in the form of a
statutory autonomous board on the line of SEBI (Security Exchange
Board of India).In December 1999, the insurance sector was thrown
open to private sector, followed by the establishment of Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) in April 2000.
realizing the vast potential in Indian market, companies all over the
globe rushed to find a foothold in the lucrative Indian market.
Evolution of technology and convergence of services witnessed the
insurance products being offered by banks also.
1912
At the same time customers are also confused to invest their money in
any insurance company. On the products front, there is a wide range of
products with different premium rates and guaranteed returns of
different companies. Introduction of liquid, transparent and flexible
policies, with unit-linked products added more attractiveness with the
existing products. More the options, more the confusion in peoples
mind and there is a need of an analysis in this industry.
Hence, this study is carried out to put some light on different products
of major insurance companies and to find the trend of the private
insurers to help the customers in making their decision as well as the
company to perform well.
a)
a)
Term Insurance
b)
c)
Endowment
d)
Annuities
Term Insurances:
c)
Endowment Policy:
Annuities:
A series of periodic payments to an annuitant (the person receiving
the benefit for life or on other agreed terms or conditions, in return
of single payment or a series of payment (premium) is called
annuity.
COMPANY PROFILE
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Private Limited is joint
venture between two leading conglomerates- Allianz AG and Bajaj
Auto Limited, the flagship company of Bajaj Group.
It is
PURPOSE
METHODOLOGY
The literature was collected by:
CONCLUSION
The central concept in review of literature is data gathering.
So, review of literature is carried on. A researcher should carefully
scrutinize the available information and user her discretion to find out
whether the gathered data is adequate and sufficient for the problem,
one enquires. The data that are suitable for one enquiry may not be
found suitable in another enquiry. Hence, if the available data are
found unsuitable they should not be used by the researcher.
The previous project reports referred for this study are as follows:
Shabna.K of Mount Carmel Institute of Management,
Bangalore University, made a study on Portfolio Building
for Mutual Fund Investors- a study conducted at
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Private Limited.
Her contribution is as follows:
The majority of the Indian investors are ready to take high
risk.
Age is one of the important demographic characteristics that
influence the investment habits.
Padmashree.B of K.K.E.C.S Institute of Management,
Bangalore University, made a study on Privatization of
Insurance in India- a study conducted at LIC of India,
Chikkodi.
After reviewing all above project reports it is found that nobody held
such kind of research on the topic of present researcher ever before.
1. It facilitates to know
Types of Primary data.
Advantages of Primary data.
Disadvantages of Primary data.
Evaluation of Primary data.
2. It helps to know the following
Topic on which the similar research has been done.
Purpose of the earlier research.
Methodology adopted in earlier research.
Conclusion derived from earlier research.
3. It facilitates to know how this research is different from the earlier
one.
4. It helped the researcher to know the area in which more
concentration is needed i.e. (The area, which has been neglected
by the earlier researcher).
5. Helped in making this research more specific and precise there by
enabling analysis the problem systematically.
TYPE OF RESEARCH
The research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and
reporting of data and findings relevant to a specific situation facing
Secondary Data:
These are data that were collected for another purpose and
already exist somewhere. The researcher started her investigation by
first examining the secondary data to see whether her problem can be
partly or wholly solved without collecting primary data. Since the
secondary data were not sufficient to solve the entire problem
primary data were collected to fill the gap.
HYPOTHESIS
No.1
Factors
Insured
Not Insured
Total
Under Ho:
Rural
13
7
20
Urban
37
13
50
Total
50
20
70
N[ad-bc]2
2 =
(a+b) (c+d) (a+c) (b+d)
Where,
70*8100
1000*1000
567
1000
=
0.567
Level of significance = = 5%
2 tab value for 1 df, a @ 5%
Since 0.567 <3.81
2 cal < 2 tab
Therefore, Ho is accepted.
That means insurance is depending on rural as well as urban people.
Conclusion:
No. 2:
Life Insurers
Private Insurers
LIC
Total
High
6
0
6
High
14
7
21
Average
16
37
53
Low
1
26
27
Very Low
0
5
5
Total
37
75
N=112
For LIC :
E(6) = (37*6)/112 = 2
E(0) =(75*6)/112 = 4
E(14) = (37*21)/112 = 7
E(16) = (37*53)/112 = 18
E(1) = (37*27)/112 = 9
E(0) = (37*5)/112 = 2
E(5)=(75*5)/112=3
Calculation of 2
O
6
14
16
1
0
0
7
37
26
5
E
2
7
18
9
2
4
14
35
18
3
(O-E)
4
7
-2
-8
-2
-4
-7
2
8
2
(O-E)2
16
49
4
64
4
16
49
4
64
4
(O-E)2/E
23
7
0.22
7.11
2
4
3.5
0.114
3.5
1.33
{(O-)2/E}=51.824
2 Cal {O-E)2/E=51.824
Degree of freedom = df = (r-1) (c-1) = 4
Where, r = Number of rows, c = Number of Columns
Level of Significance = a = 5%
Objective No.1
To study the existing business of insurance industry.
Table # 1
Table Showing Company wise investment Details of Life Insurance
Companies for the Year ending 31st March 2004.
Company
Name
Central
Governme
nt
Securoties
SG&Ogua
ranteed
Secutrities
Infrastruct
ure
Investmen
ts
Social
Sector
Investmen
t
Approved
Investmen
t
Other than
Approved
Investment
Total
Investmen
t
ING
Vysya
42.8
47.98
14.99
17.44
80.41
HDFC
Std: life
86.43
86.43
32.12
23.67
9.18
142.22
Birla
Sunlife
42.48
61.57
15.18
32.72
5.26
114.72
ICICI
Prudential
117.94
117.94
32.55
35.72
14.1
200.31
SBI Life
76.32
76.32
26.93
12.38
15.7
131.33
Om Kotak
life
59.82
73.71
23.57
45.83
12.64
143.11
Metlife
57.59
57.59
15.23
15.66
15.5
103.98
Bajaj
Allianz
73.45
73.45
24.44
38.51
0.26
136.66
Max New
York Life
42.19
106.93
27.17
27.67
168.76
10
LIC
128139
131400.7
20498.72
77046.29
16442
245387.7
11
Tata AIG
74.86
74.86
29.98
34.76
139.59
12
AMP
Sanmar
119.75
119.75
Total
128813.1
132177.5
20740.87
77450.38
16521.65
246868.6
No.
GRAPH # 1 A
Graph showing sector wise investment of life insurance as on 31.03.04
ANALYSIS:
From the above diagram, it is observed that 35% of premium
income is invested in SG & other guaranteed securities by the life
insurers, followed by 34% in Central Government securities.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that the money which the
life insurers collect from common people in term of premium, most
of that goes to Government securities which is said to be secure.
GRAPH # 1B
Graph showing the total investment of life insurance as on 31.03.04
ANALYSIS:
From the above diagram it is noticed that 99% of total
investment is made by LIC and the rest 1% is invested by all private
life insurers.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that major portion of total
investment is made by LIC.Private insurers are also investing their
money in Government Securities to be in safe side.
MARKET SHARE:
TABLE # 2
Table showing the market share of all the insurance companies in
percentage for the year 2003-2004.
Life Insurers
Tata AIG
Om kotak
Birla Sunlife
Max New York
ING Vysya
HDFC Standard Life
Metlife
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Prudential
SBI Life
Aviva
AMP Sanmar
LIC
Total
Market Share
0.48
0.25
1.21
0.62
0.14
1.08
0.05
0.44
2.97
0.59
0.1
0.04
92.03
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that LIC has the market
share of 92% and other private insurers all together have the market
share of 8% during the year 2003-2004.Among them ICICI
Prudential holds the highest market share of nearly 3%, followed
Bajaj Allianz1.21%, Birla Sunlife 0.44% of total market being very
new in the industry.
INFERENCE:
From the source of data available, it is inferred that since over
40 years only LIC was there in Indian life insurance industry the
major market share is held by the LIC. Among the private Life
insurers ICICI Prudential holds the major market share.
GRAPH # 2
Graph showing the market share of all the insurance companies in
percentage for the year 2003-2004.
Table No. 3 Table Showing the market share of private insurers for the
year 2003-2004
Life Insurers
Tata AIG
Om kotak
Birla Sunlife
Max New york
ING Vysya
HDFC Standard Life
Metlife
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Prudential
SBI Life
Aviva
AMP Sanmar
Total
Chart No. 3
Market Share
6
3
15
8
2
14
1
5
38
7
1
0
100
Analysis :
From the above table, it is observed that among the private life insurers
the major market
Share of 38% is held by ICICI Prudential, followed by Bajaj Allianz
5% and Birla sunlife 15%, HDFC Standard Life 14%.
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that being very new in the
industry Bajaj Allianz Company is doing well along with other
companies whose establishment were before Bajaj Allianz Company.
Premium Income :
Table No. 4: Table showing the premium income of private insurers
for the year 2003-004
Life Insurers
Tata AIG
Om kotak
Birla Sunlife
Max
Newyork
ING Vysya
HDFC
Standard Life
Metlife
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI
Prudential
SBI Life
AMP Sanmar
Total
Graph No.2
Premium Income(In
lakhs)
5975.22
3068.33
14956.9
7681.07
1747
13266.21
620.09
5378.39
36494.4
7275.16
460.42
98184.25
Analysis:
From the table, it is noticed that premium income during the year 200304 of all private insurance was Rs.96923.19 lakhs.ICICI Prudential
was having maximum
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that the business of private life
insurers has been
astonishing the last year.
Table No. 5 Table showing premium income of private insurers for the
year
2004 05
Life Insurers
Tata AIG
Om kotak
Birla Sunlife
Max Newyork
ING Vysya
HDFC Standard Life
Metlife
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Prudential
SBI Life
AMP Sanmar
Total
Graph No : 3
Analysis :
From the above table, it is noticed that during the year 2003-04, the
total premium income
Has jumped to Rs .536298.11 lakhs from the last year premium income
of Rs.98184 individually ICICI Prudential has earned Rs.158408.46
lakhs, followed by Bajaj allianz Rs.86001.80
Inference :
From the data available, it is inferred that the business of private life
insurers has been astonishing during the last year.
Number of Policies:
Table No. 6 showing the number of policies sold by private insurers
during the year 2004-2005
Private Life Insurers No of Policies
Tata AIG
228894
Om kotak
63468
Birla Sunlife
198370
Max Newyork
216671
ING Vysya
111141
HDFCStandard Life 206320
Metlife
46682
Bajaj Allianz
288191
ICICI Prudential
614673
SBI Life
129974
AMP Sanmar
35268
Aviva
83209
Total
2222861
Graph No. 6
Analysis :
From the above table, it is observed that among the private life insurers
ICICI Prudential has sold 214673 policies.& Followed by Bajaj Allianz
288191 policies.
Inference :
From the data available, it is inferred that Bajaj Allianz Company has
sold a good number of
Objective No 2
To study the awareness level towards insurance among the people.
Table No. 7: Table showing International Comparison of Insurance
Penetration
(Premiums as % of GDP-2000)
Countries
United State
Canada
Brazil
Mexico
Chile
United
Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Japan
South Korea
China
India
Malaysia
Indonesia
South Africa
Nigeria
Kenya
Australia
Total
8.76
6.55
2.11
1.72
4.07
Non-Life
4.28
3.28
1.75
0.85
1.15
Life
4.48
3.27
0.36
0.86
2.92
15.78
6.54
9.4
2.42
10.92
13.05
1.79
2.32
3.72
1.18
16.86
0.66
2.63
9.41
3.07
3.55
2.81
1.29
2.22
3.16
0.67
0.55
1.59
0.64
2.83
0.53
1.91
3.37
12.71
3
6.59
1.13
8.7
9.89
1.12
1.77
2.13
0.54
14.04
0.13
0.72
6.04
Graph No. 7
Analysis:
From the above table, it is noticed that the life insurance penetration in
India is only 1.77% of GDP of the year 2000, being very low. South
Africa has premium penetration of 14.04% followed by countries like
United Kingdom 12.71%, South Korea 9.89%, Japan 8.7%
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that most of the developed
countries have more
insurance penetration. India being fast developing country has to have
more insurance
Countries
United State
Canada
Brazil
Mexico
Chile
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Japan
South Korea
China
India
Malaysia
Indonesia
South Africa
Nigeria
Kenya
Australia
Total
3152.1
1516.8
75.6
101.2
175.8
3759.2
1491.4
2051.1
41.8
3973.3
1234.1
15.2
9.9
150.9
8.6
472.1
2
8.9
1859.3
Non-Life
1540.7
759.6
62.7
50.4
49.7
730.7
808.2
613.7
22.3
808.2
298.5
5.7
2.3
64.6
4.6
79.1
1.6
6.5
665.8
Life
1611.4
757.2
12.9
50.8
126
3028.5
683
1437.4
19.5
3165.1
935.6
9.5
7.6
86.4
4
329.9
0.4
2.4
1193.5
Graph No. 8
Analysis:
From the table, it is observed that the insurance density 7.6. Japan has
insurance
density of 3165.1, followed by United Kingdom 3028.5.
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that premium density of India is
very low compare to the developed countries.
No. of respondents
43
7
50
Percentage
86
14
100
Analysis:
From the above table, it is that 86% of the respondents are found to
have they
Worry of their financial status in future 14% of them are yet to plan
financial for their future
Inference:
From the sources of data available, it is inferred that people of
Bangalore are aware of the
rising cost of life and are knowledgeable life enough to invest their
money in different
financial instruments so, there exist a huge market for insurance
companies to establish
their insurance plans as attractive instrument alternative.
Table No. 10:
Table showing behavioral pattern of the respondents of rural area
regarding finance
for future.
Factors
Yes
No.
Total
No. of respondents
14
2
20
Percentage
70
30
100
Chart No.10
Analysis :
From the above table it is clear that 70% of the respondents have
planned financially for
heir future. 30% of them have not yet planned for their future.
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that Rural area people are not
satisfactorily aware of all investment alternatives. Insurance companies
have to see that everybody plans for his/her future and takes insurance
policy to make his/her family financially.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Yes
37
74
No.
13
26
Total
50
100
Chart No. 11
Analysis:
From the above table, it is noticed that 74% of the respondents are
insured and 26% of them are not insured.
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that insurance penetration in
Bangalore city is
satisfactory. Still insurance companies are expected to reduce the
percentage of non insured people.
Table No.12
Table showing insurance penetration in rural area.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Yes
13
65
No.
35
Total
20
100
Chart No. 12
Analysis:
From the above table, it is observed that 65% of the respondents are
insured, and 35% of
them are not insured.
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that in rural area insurance
penetration is comparatively low.
Table No. 13 :
Table showing customer rating of urban area for the factors of
Insurance.
Factors
Very High
High
Average
Low
Very Low
Total
Risk Cover
32
37
Security
20
13
37
Tax Shelter
6
18
23
37
14
37
Savings
Investments
12
15
37
Convenience
17
14
37
Return
20
10
37
Analysis:
From the above table, it is observed that out of 37 respondents have
taken insurance policy to cover the risk of their lives. 23 of them stated
that insurance is used to get some tax shelter. All of them stated that
security is in higher side in case of insurance. It can be even used for
some kind of savings cum investment. Return is said to be average in
case of Insurance.
Inference:
From the data available, it is inferred that insurance is not only the taxsaving tool but also serves the purpose of saving and investment.
Graph No. 13
Graph showing customer rating of urban area for the factors of
Insurance.
TABLE # 14
Table showing customer rating of rural area for the factors of Insurance.
Factors
Very High
High
Average
Low
Very Low
Total
Risk Cover
13
Security
13
Tax Shelter
13
Savings
13
Investments
13
Convenience
13
Return
10
13
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that all 13 respondents
have taken insurance policy to cover the risk of their lives. All of
them stated that security is in higher side in case of insurance. It can
be even used for some kind of savings cum investment. Return is said
to be average in case of Insurance.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that insurance is not only
the tax-saving tool but also serves the purpose of saving and
investment. In rural area, since there were very few in numbers
having monthly family income of more than Rs.5000 insurance is not
used as tax saving tool.
GRAPH # 14
Graph showing customer rating of rural area for the factors of
Insurance.
TABLE # 15
Table showing different reasons of the respondents of Bangalore city
for not being insured.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Not aware of it
Lack of money
38.46
23.07
No need
15.38
Planning to take
23.07
Any other
Total
13
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table it is seen that 38.46% of the respondents
are not insured because of lack of money 23.07% of them are not
satisfied by the characteristics insurance policy, and other 23.07% of
them are planning to take the policy 15.38% of them think that it is
not needed.
INFERENCE:
By looking at the above table it is clear that people are all
aware of insurance even though they not insured. In some cases,
people prefer other investment instruments like equity to invest their
money, since they get more return from that.
GRAPH # 15
Graph showing different reasons of the respondents of Bangalore city
for not being insured.
TABLE # 16
Table showing the different reasons of the respondents for not being
insured in rural area.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Not aware of it
28.571
Lack of money
71.428
No need
Planning to take
Any other
Total
100
ANALYSIS:
From the data collected, it is noticed that 71.428% of the
respondents are not aware of insurance and 28.57% of them are not
insured because of lack of money.
INFERENCE:
From the analysis, it is inferred that insurance is not taken by
the people because of lack of money and low awareness level.
Insurance is needed for everybody in rural area.
GRAPH # 16
Graph showing the different reasons of the respondents for not being
insured in rural area.
TABLE # 17
Table showing the need of in India of insurance according to the
respondents perception in Bangalore City.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Yes
36
72
No.
14
28
Total
50
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that 72% of the
respondents think that insurance should be compulsory in India 28%
of them think that it should not be compulsory in India.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that most of the people think
that insurance should be compulsory in India as it compulsory in
India as it cultivates the habit of saving and secures the lives.
Sometimes people like to have freedom on their investment decision
and they think insurance should not be compulsory in India.
GRAPH # 17
TABLE # 18
Table showing the perception of the respondents regarding the necessity
of insurance.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Yes
20
100
No.
Total
20
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above data, it is noticed that 100% of the respondents
are found to say that insurance is needed for everybody in India.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis it is inferred that insurance is needed
for everybody in India, as complete security can be give to the family
and savings habit can be cultivated by investing money in insurance.
Everybody can be kept safe by taking insurance policy.
GRAPH # 18
Graph showing the perception of the respondents regarding the
necessity of insurance.
OBJECTIVE NO. 3:
To study the impact of the privatization on Indian insurance business.
TABLE # 19
Table showing premium income of LIC vis--vis the private Insurers in
the year 2003-04
Companies
LIC
1134299.12
98184.25
Total
1232483.37
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that premium income of LIC
was Rs.1134299.12lakhs in the Year 2002-2003.Private life insurers
all together earned Rs.98184.25lakh premium income.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it in inferred that private life insurance
slowly placed them in a good position as their premium income is
appreciable.
GRAPH # 19
TABLE # 20
Table showing the premium income if LIC vis--vis the private
insurers for the year 2003-04.
Companies
LIC
1978593.2
536298.11
Total
2514891.31
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that LIC earned
Rs.1978593.2 lakhs during the last year and private life insurers
earned Rs.536298.11 lakhs.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that private life insurers
have captured a good market during the last year.
GRAPH # 20
Graph showing the premium income if LIC vis--vis the private
insurers for the year 2003-04.
TABLE # 21
Table showing the number of policies sold by LIC vis--vis the private
insurers during the year 2003-2004.
Life Insurers
No. of policies
LIC
24545583
837107
Total
25382690
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that in the year 2003-2004
LIC s sold 24545583 policies whereas private life insurers have sold
837107 policies.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that even though LIC has
the history of over 40 years private insurers started grabbing the
market very fast.
GRAPH # 21
Graph showing the number of policies sold by LIC vis--vis the private
insurers during the year 2003-2004.
TABLE # 22
Table showing the penetration level of different insurance companies
among the respondents of Bangalore city.
Options
NO. of Respondents
Percentage
Bajaj Allianz
10.8
ICICI Prudential
13.57
Birla Sunlife
2.7
2.7
Tata AIG
2.7
LIC
25
68
Others
Total
37
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is depicted that nearly 68% of the
respondents are insured by LIC Rest of them i.e., 32% of them are
insured by different private insurance companies such as ICICI
Prudential, Bajaj Allianz, HDFC, Standard, Birla Sunlife Tata AIG.
Among 50 samples none of them was found to be insured by other
private insurers like Metlife, ING Vysya, Aviva etc.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that since LIC has its
history of ruling the insurance industry for over 40 years before
privatization most of the people are insured by LIC. But effort of
private players is also appreciable in urban area. Among the private
insurers ICICI Prudential, Bajaj Allianz is seemed to have good
position in the city.
GRAPH # 22
Graph showing the penetration level of different insurance companies
among the respondents of Bangalore city.
TABLE # 23
Table showing the responses of the respondents of rural area towards
different insurance companies.
Options
NO. of Respondents
Percentage
Bajaj Allianz
ICICI Prudential
Birla Sunlife
Tata AIG
LIC
13
100
Others
Total
13
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 100% of the
respondents are insured by LIC. No other insurer is found in rural
area.
INFERENCE:
From the above table, it is seen that other than LIC, none of the
people is insured by any private insurer. There is no shadow of
private insurers in the rural area. There exist a huge market where
Bajaj Allianz company can been established as one among the major
private Insurers.
GRAPH # 23
Graph showing the responses of the respondents of rural area towards
different insurance companies.
Table # 24
Factors
Very High
High
Average
Low
Very Low
Total
Agent Pursuance
Attractive Benefits
Attractive Return
Low Premium
Reference
Service
Reputation
Convenience
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that all 4 respondents have
taken insurance policy from the bajaj allianz Company Because of its
attractive benefits, attractive return and Low premium rate.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that Bajaj Allianz
Company has to have more number of centers to serve the customers
a better service. Reputation of the company has to be improved.
GRAPH # 24
Graph showing customer rating for Bajaj Allianz in urban area.
TABLE # 25
Table showing customer rating for ICICI Prudential in urban area.
Factors
Very
High
High
Average
Low
Very
Low
Total
Agent Pursuance
Attractive Benefits
Attractive Return
Low Premium
Reference
Service
Reputation
Convenience
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that all 5 respondents have
taken insurance policy from ICICI Prudential because of its
reputation, service and convenience. Benefits return and premium
rate are average.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that reputation and
service of ICICI Prudential Company are good.
GRAPH # 25
TABLE # 26
Table showing customer rating for LIC in urban area.
Very
High
High
Average
Low
Very Low
Total
10
25
17
25
10
25
Low Premium
21
25
Reference
11
25
Service
10
25
Reputation
25
25
Convenience
10
25
Factors
Agent
Pursuance
Attractive
Benefits
Attractive
Return
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that all 25 respondents
have taken insurance policy from LIC because of its reputation, and
convenience. Benefits return and premium rate are average and
service is stated to be poor of LIC.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that reputation is the
major reason to buy policy from LIC.
GRAPH # 26
Graph showing customer rating for LIC in urban area.
TABLE # 27
Table showing customer rating for LIC in rural area.
Factors
Very High
High
Average
Low
Very Low
Total
Agent Pursuance
13
Attractive Benefits
13
Attractive Return
10
13
Low Premium
13
Reference
10
13
Service
11
13
Reputation
13
13
Convenience
13
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that all 13 respondents
have taken insurance policy from LIC because of its reputation and
convenience. Benefits return and premium rate are average and
service is stated to be poor of LIC.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that reputation is the
major reason to buy policy from LIC.
Graph No. 27
Graph showing customer rating for LIC in rural area.
TABLE # 28
Table showing the time of taking the policy of the respondents of
Bangalore City.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
12
32.43
15
40.54
24.32
2.7
Total
37
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 40.54% and 32.43% of
the respondents have taken policies 2-5 years back and two to five
just a year back respectively 24.32% of them have taken the policies
6-1 years back and only 2.7% six to years of them have taken the
policies 11 years back and above.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that since most of them
respondents have taken policies recently LIC has faced competition
from private insurers.
GRAPH # 28
Graph showing the time of taking the policy of the respondents of
Bangalore City.
TABLE # 29
Table showing the time of taking the policy by the respondents of rural
area.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
15.38
46.15
23.07
15.38
Total
13
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 46.15% and 23.07% of
the respondents have taken the policies 2-5 years back and six to ten
years back respectively 15.38% of them are taken the policies just a
years back and only 11% years back and above respectively.
INFERENCE:
From the source available, it is inferred that of the people are
taken policies two to five years back when there were very few
private insurances. So people had very few options of to take the
policies. That could be the main reason, why people of rural area are
taken policies only from LIC.
GRAPH # 29
Graph showing the time of taking the policy by the respondents of rural
area.
TABLE # 30
Table showing the satisfaction levels of the respondents of Bangalore
towards their insurers.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Completely Satisfied
13.51
Satisfied
30
81.08
2.7
2.7
Total
37
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is depicted that 81.08% of the
respondents are satisfied with their insurers 13.51% of them are
completely satisfied and 207% of them are some what satisfied and
not at all satisfied.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that in urban area where
the existence of private insurance is noticeable, the level of
satisfaction is very high among the customers.
GRAPH # 30
Graph showing the satisfaction levels of the respondents of Bangalore
towards their insurers.
TABLE # 31
Table showing the satisfaction levels of the respondents of Rural Area
towards their insurers.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Completely Satisfied
Satisfied
10
76.92
15.38
7.69
Total
13
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is depicted that 76.92% of the
respondents are satisfied with their insurers 13.38% and 7.69% of
them are some what satisfied and not at all satisfied by their insurer.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis it is inferred that even though most of
the respondents are satisfied by their insurers but still there are
people who are some what satisfied and not at all satisfied by their
insurer.
GRAPH # 31
Graph showing the satisfaction levels of the respondents of Rural Area
towards their insurers.
TABLE # 32
Table showing the satisfaction level of the respondents of Bangalore
City towards the services of their insurers.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Excellent
2.7
Very Good
5.4
Good
32
86.486
Fair
2.7
Poor
2.7
Total
37
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 86.48% of the
respondents feel the services of their insurers is Good 5.4% of
them feel that the service, is Very Good, 2.7% of them feel the
service is excellent, fair and Poor.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that the service of the
insurers is satisfactory in Bangalore city.
GRAPH # 32
Graph showing the satisfaction level of the respondents of Bangalore
City towards the services of their insurers.
TABLE # 33
Table showing the different level of satisfaction of the respondents
towards the services of their insurers.
Factors
No. of respondents
Percentage
Excellent
Very Good
Good
11
84.61
Fair
7.691
Poor
7.691
Total
13
100
ANALYSIS:
From the data collected, it is noticed that 84.61% of the
respondents are said to have good service from LIC 7.691% of them
are said to have fair and poor service from LIC. None of them was
said to have excellent and very good service from LIC.
INFERENCE:
From the data collected, it is inferred that the service offered
by LIC is average to satisfactory.
GRAPH # 33
Graph showing the different level of satisfaction of the respondents
towards the services of their insurers.
OBJECTIVE NO. 4:
To study the behaviour of existing customers in the industry.
TABLE # 34
Table showing different categories of occupation of the respondents of
urban area.
Categories
No. of respondents
Percentage
Self Employed
20
40
Salaried
29
58
Others
Total
50
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that at 58% of the total
respondents were found to be salaried, 40% of them were self
employed. Among all the respondents only 2% were students.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis, it is inferred that all the respondents
have some earnings and are financially capable of investing their
money in financial instrument to be financially sound in future.
GRAPH # 34
Graph showing different categories of occupation of the respondents of
urban area.
TABLE # 35
Categories
No. of respondents
Percentage
Self Employed
12
60
Salaried
10
Others
30
Total
20
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 60% of the respondents
are self employed 10% of them are salaried, 30% of them are
farmers.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that salaried people in
rural area are found to be very few in number.
GRAPH # 35
TABLE # 36
Table showing the number of respondents of different groups of
monthly family income in urban area.
Categories
No. of respondents
Percentage
11
22
Rs. 5001-10000
15
30
Rs.10001-15000
18
Rs.15001-20000
12
10
Total
50
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, shows it is noticed that most of the
respondents(30%) have monthly family income of Rs.5001-10000
and as the monthly family income higher the number of respondents
were found to few in number having monthly family income of more
than Rs.30000.
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that thee is lack of
respondents from higher income group. There exists a potential
market of insurance companies in Bangalore city, since average
income of the city is high.
GRAPH # 36
Graph showing the number of respondents of different groups of
monthly family income in urban area.
TABLE # 37
Table showing different income groups of respondents in rural area.
Categories
No of respondents
Percentage (%)
Rs. 2500-5000
13
65
Rs. 5001-10000
25
Rs. 10001-15000
10
Rs. 15001-20000
Rs. 20001-25000
Rs. 25001-30000
Total
20
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is observed that 65% of the
respondents have the earning of Rs.2500-5000, 25% of them earn
Rs.5001-10000 and 10% of them earn Rs.10001-15000.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis it inferred that people of rural area
have the earning of below Rs.15000. Insurance companies have to
insure not only high earning people but also low earning people.
GRAPH # 37
TABLE # 38
Table showing the different types policies taken by respondents of
Bangalore city.
Option
No. of Responses
Percentage
Whole life
Term Insurance
2
5
4.54
11.36
Endowment
Children's Policy
24
1
54.54
2.27
Money Back
Annuity
11
1
25
2.27
ULIP
Total
44
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 54.54% of the
respondents have taken endowment policy,25% of them have taken
money back policy, 11.36% and 4.54% of them have taken term
insurance policy and whole life policy respectively.2.27% of them
have taken childrens policy and annuity and none of them has take
ULIP(Unit Link Insurance Policy).
INFERENCE:
From the data available, it is inferred that people are inclined
to endowment and money back policies. Along with these Bajaj
Allianze has to sell more whole life, term, children, annuity, policies,
ULIP is not at all known to the people, more publicity is needed for
such an attractive policy.
GRAPH # 38
Graph showing the different types policies taken by respondents of
Bangalore city.
TABLE # 39
Table showing the different types policies of the respondents of Rural
Area.
Option
No. of Responses
Percentage
Whole life
Term Insurance
6.25
Endowment
10
62.5
Children's Policy
Money Back
31.25
Annuity
ULIP
Total
16
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed 62.5% of the respondents
are taken endowment policy, 31.25% of them are taken money back
policy and 6.25% of them are taken term insurance policy.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis it is inferred that most of the
respondents have very less ideas about whole life childrens policy,
annuity, and ULIP. Public is needed for these attractive policies in
rural area endowment and money back policies are popular enough
among the people of rural area.
GRAPH # 39
TABLE # 40
Table showing the different terms of policies chosen by respondents of
Bangalore city.
Factors
No. of Responses
Percentage
5 years
6-10 years
11-15 years
10
16-20 years
24
60
10
40
25
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table it is depicted that 60% of the respondents
have chosen their policy term 16 years- 20 years of 25% of them
have chosen term of 21 years and above 10% and 5% of them have
chosen term of 11 years- 15 years and 6 years to 10 years
respectively. None of them has chosen the policy of 5 years.
INFERENCES:
From the data available, it is inferred that most of the people
choose long term policy to get risk-cover for a long period and as
term increases premium rate comes down.
GRAPH # 40
Graph showing the different terms of policies chosen by respondents of
Bangalore city.
TABLE # 41
No. of Responses
0
3
3
7
0
13
Percentage
0
23.1
23.1
53.84
0
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 53.84% of the
respondent have taken policy for the term of 16years to 20 years
23.1% of them have taken policies for 6 years to 10 years and
11years to 15 years.
INFERENCES:
From the above analysis it is inferred that insurance is treated
as long term investment instrument and as the term is increased
premium rate is come down.
GRAPH # 41
TABLE # 42
Table showing the different modes of paying the premium of the
respondents of Bangalore city.
Factors
No. of Responses
Percentage
Annually
19
47.5
Half Yearly
12.5
Quarterly
12
30
Monthly
10
Total
40
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 47.5% of the
respondents like to pay premium yearly, 30% of them pay premium
quarterly 12.5% and 10% of them pay premium half yearly and
monthly respectively.
INFERENCES:
From the data available, it is inferred that most of the people
pay premium yearly and quarterly. Salaried people pay premium by
monthly deduction from salary. Research shows that more lapse of
policy occurs in quarterly mode of paying the premium.
GRAPH # 42
Graph showing the different modes of paying the premium of the
respondents of Bangalore city.
TABLE # 43
Table showing the different modes of paying the premium chosen by
the respondents of rural area.
Factors
No. of Responses
Percentage
Annually
21.43
Half Yearly
57.14
Quarterly
21.43
Monthly
Total
14
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is seen that 57.14% of the respondents
have the yearly mode to pay the premium, 21.43%of them have
chosen annum & quarterly mode of paying the premium. None of
them pay premium monthly.
INFERENCES:
From the data available it is inferred that since there are very
few salaried people in rural area, the number of respondents for
monthly mode of paying the premium is low. Most of them are
comfortable to pay the premium half-yearly as it neither become a
big burden nor increase the headache of paying the premium every
three months.
GRAPH # 43
Graph showing the different modes of paying the premium chosen by
the respondents of rural area.
TABLE # 44
Table showing different premium payment term of the respondents of
Bangalore city.
Factors
No. of Responses
Percentage
Regular
34
91.89
Single
2.7
15years
2.7
Others
2.7
Total
37
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 91.89% of the
respondents have chosen regular premium payment term, 5.40% have
chosen 16years and 2.70% have chosen 15 years term to pay the
premium. None of them has chosen single premium payment term.
INFERENCES:
From the data available, it is inferred that since in the case of
limited term of paying the premium, the total amount of premium is
condensed in limited term, the amount of premium looks high. And
high premium cannot be bearable by most of the people. So, people
usually choose regular or long term mode of payment term. In some
cases businessmen who are not sure about their earning capacity in
for future choose a limited term for paying the premium.
GRAPH # 44
TABLE # 45
Table showing the different terms chosen by the respondents of rural
area for paying the premium.
Factors
No. of Responses
Percentage
Regular
13
100
Single
15years
Others (16years)
Total
13
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 100% of the
respondents pay premium regularly. None of them is found to pay
premium in limited term.
INFERENCES:
From the data available, it is inferred that since in case of
limited term of paying the premium the total amount of premium gets
condensed in limited term the amount of premium unaffordable by
the people of rural area, and usually they choose regular term of
paying the premium.
GRAPH # 45
TABLE # 46
Table showing different benefit opted by the respondents of Bangalore
city.
Factors
Family Income Benefit.
Critical Illness
Hospital Cases
Waiver of Premium
Accidental Death Benefit
No. of Responses
4
2
2
13
35
Percentage
4.65
2.32
2.32
15.11
40.69
26
4
86
30.23
4.65
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 40.69%, 13.23% and
15.11% of the respondents have taken the benefits related to accident,
4.6% of them have taken family income and extra cover benefit.
2.32% of them have taken critical illness and hospital cash benefits.
INFERENCES:
Having a look at the table it is clear that people choose more of
those benefits which are related to some uncertainty to make their
family to be secured after such things happen. Generally people dont
go for the benefits like critical illness and hospital cash because the
possibility of getting any such critical illness is comparatively low
and normally a person does not need to get admitted in hospital every
year. Presently Bajaj Allianz Life insurance company is the only
company who provides family increase benefit and covers 11 critical
illnesses.
GRAPH # 46
Graph showing different benefit opted by the respondents of Bangalore
city.
TABLE # 47
Table showing different benefits chosen by the respondents of rural
area.
Factors
Family Income Benefit.
Critical Illness
Hospital Cases
Waiver of Premium
Accidental Death Benefit
No. of Responses
0
0
0
9
12
Percentage
0
0
0
26.47
35.29
13
0
34
38.23
0
100
ANALYSIS:
From the above table, it is noticed that 38.23% of the
respondents have chosen accidental permanent total/partial disability
benefit. 35.29% of them have chosen accidental death benefit and
26.47% of them have chosen waiver of premium. None of them was
found to have family income benefit. Critical illness benefit, hospital
cash and extra cover benefit.
INFERENCES:
From the above analysis it is inferred that most of the benefits,
which relate to some uncertainty, are chosen by the people, Nobody
was found to have family income benefit because presently Bajaj
Allianz company is the only one company which provides this
benefit and it is inferred from the analysis that nobody was insured
by any of the private insures. Critical illness and hospital cash and
extra cover benefits are not opted by anybody because possibility of
getting such illness is low.
GRAPH # 47
Graph showing different benefits chosen by the respondents of rural
area.
TABLE # 48
PRODUCTS AVAILABLE OF DIFFERENT COMPANIES
Name of the Life
Insurer
Bajaj Allianz Life
Insurance Co. Ltd.
AMP
sanmar
Assurance Co. Ltd.
Birla
Sunlife
Insurance Co. Ltd.
HDFC Standard
Life Insurance
Ltd.
ICICI
Prudential
Insurance Co. Ltd.
Name of the
Life Insurer
TaTa AIG Life
Insurance Co.
Ltd
Name of the
Life Insurer
Ing
Vysya
Life Insurance
Co. Ltd.
Life Insurance
Corporation
of India
Max New
York
Life Insurance
Co.Ltd
Om
Kotak
Life Insurance
Co Ltd
Sbi
Life
Insurance Co
Ltd
Term benefit
Accident Death & Disability
Rider Waiver of Premium
Term Rider
Khetihar Mazdoor Bima Yojana
Shiksha Sahayag Yogana
Bima Nivesh
New Jeevan Akshay-1
New Jeevan Dhara/Jevan
Suraksha
LICs Bima Plus Unit Linked
Insurance Policy
Jeevan Anand
New Bima Kiran
New Jeevan Shree
Group Term Insurance
Endowment to age 60
Children endowment
Kotak Endowment Plan
Kotak Money Back Plan
Kotak Insurance Bond
Kotak Gramin Bima Yojana
Kotak Term assurance plan
Kotak insurance bond new version
Kotak credit term group plan
Kotak investment assurance plan
Young Sanjeevan
Sukhjeevan
SBI Life Scholar
SBI Life-super Suraksha
Swarna Ganga
SBI Life-Credit Guard
OBJECTIVE NO.5
To study the trend of private insurers in India
TREND ANALYSIS
TABLE # 49
Table showing the growth of private Life Insurers.
Factors
Premium Income
Growth
2003-04
98184.25
-
2005-05
536298.1
48113.85
ANALYSIS:
From the source of data, it is observed that in the year 2004-05
growth was 48113.85 lakh.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis, it is inferred that business of private
life insurers is in boom now. It is expected to grow tremendously in
future.
GRAPH # 49
Graph showing the growth of private Life Insurers.
TABLE # 50
Table showing the growth of Bajaj Allianz Company
Factors
2003-04
2005-05
Premium Income
17970.51
86001.8
Growth
68031.29
ANALYSIS:
From the data available, it noticed that during the year the
growth in premium income is Rs.68031.25.
INFERENCE:
From the above analysis, it is inferred that a tremendous
growth is seen by the company during the year.
GRAPH # 50
Table showing the growth of Bajaj Allianz Company
Indian Population
1Billion
GDP as in 2000
Rs.20000Billion
23%
Rs.240Million
It acts as mobilizer of
QUESTIONNAIRE
Few Moments of Yours.
Liya Mathew.
: ___________________________________
Age
Address
: __________________________________
__________________________________
Contact No.
: (o) ________________________________
(R) ________________________________
(M) ________________________________
E-Mail ID
Marital Status
________________________________
: Single
Married
No. of Dependents
Sector
: Urban
Rural
b) Salaried
e) Rs.20001-25000
b) Rs.5001-10000
f) Rs.25001-30000
c) Rs.10001-15000
d) Rs.15001-20000
b) No
b) No
6. If yes, rate the factors that you looked for while taking the policy.
Very High
High Average
a) Risk Cover
b) Security
c) Tax Shelter
d) Savings
e) Investment
f) Convenience
g) Return
7. Who is your insurer?
a) Allianz Bajaj
b) L.I.C
c) ICICI
d) Birla Sunlife
e) HDFC
f) Tata AIG
8. Rate the factors that prompted you to take the policy of that particular
company.
Very High High Average Low Very Low
a) Agent Pursuance
b) Attractive Benefit
c) Attractive Return
d) Low Premium
e) Reference
f) Service
g) Reputation
h) Convenience
9. When did you take the policy?
a) Just a year back
b) Term Insurance
d) Childrens Policy
e) Money Back
f) Annuity
g) ULIP
c) Endowment
b) Half Yearly
c) Quaterly
d) Monthly
b) Single
c) 15 Years
b) 6-10 Years
d) 16-20 Years
c) 11-15 Years
16. What are the benefits do you get with your policy?
a) Family Income Benefit
b) Critical Illness
c) Hospital Cash
c) Waiver of Premium
b) Satisfied
c) Somewhat Satisfied
d) Not satisfied
b) Very Good
c) Good
d) Fair
e) Poor
19. If you are not insured what would be the reason behind it?
a) Not aware of it
b) Lack of money
d) No Need
e) Planning to Take
f) Any other, Specify _________________________
20. Do you think that insurance should be compulsory for everyone
in India?
a) Yes
b) No
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:-
I.M PANDEY
Financial Management
8th Edition, Vikas Publications,
New Delhi, 2001.
PRASANNA CHANDRA
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management
Tata Mc-Graw Hill
Dr. B G SATYAPRASAD
Financial Management
2nd Edition, Himalaya Publications,
New Delhi, 2002.
INSURANCE POST
OUTLOOK MONEY
INVESTMENT MONITOR
DALAL STREET
WEBSITES:www.irdaindia.org
www.moneycontrol.com
www.myiris.com
www.allianzbajaj.co.in
www.licindia.com
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project entitled
INSURANCE BUSINESS UNDER
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO
BAJAJ ALLIANZ
Prepared and submitted by
LIYA MATHEW (Reg. no. 03ACCM6017)
In partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of
MASTER OF BUSNESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA)
Of Bangalore University, Bangalore under the guidance of
Mr. BABU. K
Is a record of bonafide work done by her in the
Academic year 2003 2005 at Al-Ameen Institute of
Management Studies.
This project has not previously formed the basis for the award of any
degree / diploma / Fellowship or other similar titles.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
Mrs. B A Anuradha
(Principal)
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project entitled
INSURANCE BUSINESS UNDER
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO
BAJAJ ALLIANZ
MR. BABU K
(PROJECT GUIDE)
Date: 31-May-2005
Place: Bangalore
Mr. Pranav Sisir
(Sales Team
Manager)
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted To Bangalore University in Partial Fulfillment for the Award of the
Degree Of
STUDENT DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the dissertation entitled Insurance
Business Under Global Environment With Special Reference
To Bajaj Allianz under the guidance of Mr. BABU K is my
original work. The conclusions and findings in this report are
based on the information collected by me.
Date:
Place: Bangalore
LIYA MATHEW
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The guidance and efforts of many people has resulted in
successful completion of this project. I wish to acknowledge my
sincere gratitude to all those who have helped me in some way or
other in this project.
I express my sincere thanks to Mrs. B A Anuradha, Principal
of Al-Ameen Institute of Management Studies for permitting me
to carry out the work and for her encouragement.
My heartiest thanks to Mr. BABU K, Internal Guide of AlAmeen Institute of Management Studies, for his invaluable
guidance through out this endeavor.
Finally I would like to thanks to my parents and friends for
helping me in all possible ways throughout this work.
Date :
Place: Bangalore
LIYA MATHEW
PAGE
INTRODUCTION
PAGE
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
HISTORY OF INSURANCE
COMPANY PROFILE
18
20
22
23
24
PAGE
PURPOSE
25
METHODOLOGY
26
CONCLUSION
27
29
PAGE
TYPES OF RESEARCH
30
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
30
SAMPLE SIZE
30
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
30
INSTRUMENTATION TECHNIQUE
31
32
33
34
PAGE
HYPOTHESIS
35
39
141
PAGE
CONCLUSION FROM THE STUDY
142
145
147
QUESTIONNAIRE
148
BIBLIOGRAPHY
154
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER NO.
CHAPTER 1
PARTICULARS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PAGE
1
CHAPTER 2
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 3
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
25
CHAPTER 4
METHODOLOGY
30
CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 6
35
142