Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
General:
When a slab is supported directly on columns, without beams and girders, it is called a flat plate
slab. Although thicker and more heavily reinforced than slabs in beam and girder construction,
flat plate slabs are advantageous because they offer no obstruction to passage of light (as beam
construction does); savings in story height and in the simpler form work involved; less danger of
collapse due to overload; and better fire protection with a sprinkler system because the spray is
not obstructed by beams.
Objective of the Study:
The objectives of the study were:
To analyze and design a six-storied beam supported building system.
To analyze and design the same building for flat plate slab system.
To compare the concrete and steel requirement of the two types of building.
Methodology
i. Analysis Phase
Requires extensive FEM analysis
Correction of analysis results for BNBC since in the software we used UBC* 94 code
Development of shear force & moment envelope to determining the critical sections & values of
critical shear and moment for design
ii. Design & Estimation Phase
Slab, Beam & Column Design & Estimation through manual calculation
ORGANIZATION of the Thesis Works:
The thesis comprises of the following five chapters:
Chapter- 1: Includes a brief introduction, objectives of the study andORGANIZATIONS of the
thesis paper.
Chapter- 2: Includes compilation of the relevant literature that has been reviewed for the
study.
Chapter- 3: Includes a detailed description of the analysis.
Chapter- 4: Includes the comparison of the results of analysis.
Chapter- 5: Includes conclusions and recommendations for further study.
Sometimes shape details have an unexpectedly large effect on the wind pressure distribution.
Parapet walls, large chimneys, silos and spires may have considerable influence and often the
only way to assess such effects is to test a scale model in a wind tunnel.
Openings:
The size and location of opening such as windows and doors determine the internal pressure that
must be considered in the calculation of net forces of walls and roofs. Internal pressure tend to
take on the values appropriate to the exterior of the wall in which in which the opening
predominate. If they are small and uniformly distributed, values of 2 are recommended, the
more unfavorable of the two to be considered in each case.
Wind direction:
The orientation of a building to the wind has a market effect on pressure distribution, particularly
on suction maxima, which occur over a small area near the leading edges of roofs.
Increase of wind speed with height:
Since the wind speed and consequently the velocity pressure increase with height above the
ground, a height factor is applied to the basic pressure in the design of building.
Shielding:
Other buildings, trees and similar large objects in the immediate vicinity have a bearing on
pressure distribution. The shielding provided is usually difficult to estimate and model tests
provide the most convenient means of determining design values. The assignment of reduction
for shielding is completed by the fact that conditions could change during the life of the structure.
Shielding does not always has a beneficial effect, and in some cases suction coefficients should
be increased because of the proximity of a neighboring building.
Wind pressures on various part of building
Roofs:
The roof is usually the critical area in the wind design of low building, particularly residential
structures. Where it is made up of light- weight components particular attention must be paid to
anchorage details because of the suction condition prevailing over most, if not all, of it. A good
example of such precautions is the time honored custom of weighting roofs in alpine areas with
large stones.
Critical angle, windward slope:
For every sloped roof there is a certain slope angle at which the suction coefficients over the
windward slope reaches a numerical maximum.
Steep roofs:
As the roof slope increases beyond the critical angle the average pressure coefficient decreases
numerically to zero; it the increases in a positive direction, indicating pressure, to maximum of +
0.8 or so for a slope angle of 90 degrees.
Leeward slope:
The effect of slope and building dimension ratios are much less pronounced of suctions on the
leeward slope and for general purposes could probably be disregarded.
Local suctions:
Local suctions are more serious for wind at an angle (usually about 45 degree) to the side of the
building.
Walls:
For tall, slender structures the design of the walls and the frame, with regard to overturning
moment, are likely to be critical. The trend toward high-rise buildings and
curtain wall construction may lead to greater problems in limiting sway and specifying the
strength of fastenings for the wall panels.
Earthquake Load
Minimum design earthquake forces for buildings, structures or components of buildings or
structures, can be calculated either by the Equivalent static force method of by the Dynamic
response method. We will calculate earthquake load by equivalent static force method.
Seismic zoning map
The seismic zoning map of Bangladesh is provided by BNBC. Based on the severity of the
probable intensity of seismic ground motion and damages, Bangladesh has been divided into
three seismic zones.
These are
1.
Zone-1
2.
Zone-2
3.
Zone-3
Selection of lateral force method
Seismic lateral forces on primary framing systems shall be determined by using either the
equivalent static force method of the dynamic response method with the restriction given bellowa)
1.
2.
4.
A tower like building or structure having a flexible upper portion supported on a rigid lower
portion where:
Both portion of the structure considered separately can be classified as regular structures,
The average story stiffness of the lower portion is at least tin times the average storey stiffness
b)
1.
1.
The Dynamic response method shall be used for structures of the following typesStructures 75 m or more in height except as permitted by case a (1).
1.
Structures having stiffness, weight or geometric vertical irregularity of type 1, 2& 3 is
defined in the BNBC table or structures not described.
2.
Structure over 20 m in height in seismic zone 3 not having the same structural
system throughout their height except as permitted by BNBC.
Structures, regular or irregular, located on soil profile type S 4 as described, which have a period
greater than .1 second. The analysis shall include the effect of the soil at the site.
2)
Where an allowance for partition load is include in the floor design in accordance
with BNBC all such loads but not less than .6 KN / m2 shall be applicable.
3)
= (1.25 S) / T2/3
= Ct (hn) 3/4
Where,
Where,
The remaining portion of the base shear (V-F t) shall be distributed over the height of the building,
including level n, according to the relation:
Fi
1.
5. Loads must be due to gravity only and the live load must not exceed two times the
dead load.
6.
If beams are used on the column lines, the relative stiffness of the beams in the two
perpendicular directions, given by the ratio: 1l2 / 2l12, must be between 0.2 and 5.0
Static moment
For purpose of calculating the total static moment Mo in a panel, the clear span ln in the direction
of moments is used. The clear span is defined to extend from face to face of the columns,
capitals, brackets, or walls but is not to be less than 0.65 l1. The total factored moment in a
span, for a strip bounded laterally by the centerline of the panel on each side of the centerline of
supports isMo = wu l2 ln / 8
Reciprocal Method
A simple, approximate design method developed by Bresler has been satisfactorily verified by
comparison with results of extensive tests and accurate calculation. The column interaction
surface can alternatively be plotted as a function of the axial load P n and eccentricities ex = Mny /
Pn and ey = Mnx / Pn, The surface S1 of fig-a can be transformed into an equivalent failure surface
S2, as shown in fig b, where ex and ey are plotted against 1 / Pn rather than Pn. Thus, ex = ey = 0
corresponds to the inverse of the capacity of the column if it were concentrically loaded, P o and
this is plotted as point C. For ey = 0 and any given value of ex, there is a load Pnyo that would
result in failure. The reciprocal of this load is plotted as point A. Similarly
given value of ey, there is a certain load Pnxo that would cause failure, the reciprocal of which is
point B. The values of Pnxo and Pnyo are easily established, for known eccentricities of loading
applied to a given column, using the methods already established for uniaxial bending or using
design charts for uniaxial bending. An oblique plane S 2 is defined by the three points A, B, C. This
plane is used as an approximation of the actual failure surface.
The vertical ordinate 1 / P n, exact to the true failure surface will always be conservatively
estimated by the distance 1 / P n, approx to the oblique plane ABC because of the concave
upward eggshell shape of the true failure surface. In other words,
1 / Pn, approx is always greater than 1 / P n, exact which means that Pn, approx is always less
than Pn, exact. Breslers reciprocal load equation derives from the geometry of the approximating
plane, it can be shown that1 / Pn = 1 / Pnxo + 1 / Pnyo + 1 / Po
Where,
The above equation has been found to be acceptably accurate for design purposes provided n
0.10o. It is not reliable where biaxial bending is prevalent and accompanied by an axial force
smaller than o / 10.
Analysis and Design Basis:
This thesis is prepared properly based on Bangladesh National Building Code. Every part of this
thesis is properly maintained the recommendation of this code. Here some features are
described belowBangladesh country paper for WCDR 7
Does your country have building codes of practice and standards in place?
Which takes into account seismic risk?
The National Building Code was formulated and published in 1993. Bangladesh does not have
any separate code for the design or construction of earthquake resistant structure. However, a
new seismic zoning map and detailed seismic design provisions were incorporated into the
National Building Code in 1993 that replaces the code prepared in 1979. The Bangladesh
Earthquake Society has recently published a Bengali translation of the Guidelines for Earthquake
Resistant Non-Engineered Construction, written by the International Association of Earthquake
Engineering 3. The enforcement of the standards presented in the National Building Code
requires close monitoring by concerned agencies. The shortage of trained staff to monitor new
construction impedes the effectiveness of the building standards.
Analysis Software:
There is much finite element software for analyzing structure. ETABS is one of them. Every
analysis is this thesis is done by using ETABS 8 package. In the following paragraph we will
discuss some of its features-
Introduction
ETABS is a sophisticated, yet easy to use, special purpose analysis and design program
developed specifically for building systems. ETABS version 8 features an intuitive and powerful
graphical interface coupled with unmatched modeling, analytical and design procedures, all
integrated using a common database. Although quick and easy for simple structures, ETABS can
also handle the largest and most complex building models, including a wide range of nonlinear
behaviors, making it the tool of choice for structural engineers in the building industry.
History and advantages of ETABS
Dating back more than 30 years to the original development of TABS, the predecessor of ETABS,
it was clearly recognized that buildings constituted a very special class of structures. Early
releases of ETABS pro-vided input, output and numerical solution techniques that took into
consideration the characteristics unique to building type structures, providing a tool that offered
significant savings in time and increased accuracy over general purpose programs. As computers
and computer interfaces evolved, ETABS added computationally complex analytical options such
as dynamic nonlinear behavior, and powerful CAD-like drawing tools in a graphical and objectbased interface. Although ETABS Version 8 looks radically different from its predecessors of 30
years ago, its mission remains the same: to provide the profession with the most efficient and
comprehensive software for the analysis and design of buildings. To that end, the current release
follows the same philosophical approach put forward by the original programs, namely: Most
buildings are of straightforward geometry with horizontal beams and vertical columns. Although
any building configuration is possible with ETABS, in most cases, a simple grid system defined by
horizontal floors and vertical column lines can establish building geometry with minimal effort.
Many of the floor levels in buildings are similar. This commonality can be used numerically to
reduce computational effort. The input and output conventions used correspond to common
building technology. With ETABS, the models are defined logically floor-by-floor, column, bay-bybay and wall-by-wall and not as a stream of non-descript nodes and elements as in general
purpose programs. Thus the structural definition is simple, concise and meaningful. In most
buildings, the dimensions of the members are large in relation to the bay widths and story height.
Those dimensions have a significant effect on the stiffness of the frame ETABS corrects for such
effects in the formulation of the member stiff-ness, unlike most general-purpose programs that
work on center-line-to-center-line dimensions. The results produced by the programs should be in
a form directly usable by the engineer. General purpose computer programs produce result in a
general form that may need additional processing before they are useable in structural design.
An integrated approach
ETABS is a completely integrated system. Embedded beneath the simple, intuitive user interface
are very powerful numerical methods, design procedures and international design codes, all
working from a single comprehensive database. This integration means that you create only one
model of the floor systems and the vertical and lateral framing system to analyze and design the
entire building. Everything you need is integrated into one versatile analysis and design package
with one Windows-based graphical user interface. No external modules are maintained, and no
data is transferred between programs or modules. The effects on one part of the structure from
changes in another part are instantaneous and automatic. The integrated modules include:
Gravity load distribution module for the distribution of vertical loads to columns and beams
when plate bending floor elements are not provided as a part of the floor system.
Finite element-based linear static and dynamic analysis module.
Finite element-based nonlinear static and dynamic analysis module.
Output display and report generation module.
Steel frame design module (column, beam and brace).
Concrete frame design module (column and beam).
Composite beam design module
Steel joist design module
Shear wall design module.
Modeling features
The ETABS building is idealized as an assemblage of area, line and point object. Those objects
are used to represent wall, floor, column, beam, brace and link/spring physical members. The
basic frame geometry is defined with reference to a simple three dimensional grid system. With
relatively simple modeling techniques, very complex farming situations may be considered. The
buildings may be unsymmetrical and non-rectangular in plan. Torsional behavior of the floors and
inter story compatibility of the floors are accurately reflected in the result. The solution enforces
complete three dimensional displacement compatibility, making it possible to capture tubular
effects associated with the behavior of tall structures having relatively closely spaced columns.
Semi-rigid floor diaphragms may be modeled to capture the effects of in plane floor deformations.
Floor objects may span between adjacent levels to create sloped floors (ramps), which can be
useful for modeling parking garage structures. Modeling of partial diaphragms, such as in
mezzanines, setbacks, atriums and floor openings, is possible without the use of artificial
(dummy) floors and column lines. It is also possible to model situations with multiple
independent diaphragms at each level, allowing the modeling of buildings consisting of several
towers rising from a common base. The column, beam and brace elements may be nonprismatic, and they may have partial fixity at their end connections. They also may have uniform,
partial uniform and trapezoidal load patterns, and they may have temperature loads. The effects
of the finite dimensions of the beams and columns on the stiffness of a frame system are
included using end offsets that can be automatically calculated. The floors and walls can be
modeled as membrane elements with in-plane stiffness only, plate bending elements with out-ofplane stiffness only or full shell-type elements, which combine both in-plane and out-of-plane
stiffness. Floor and wall objects may have uniform load patterns in-plane or out-of-plane, and
they may have temperature loads. The column, beam, brace, floor and wall objects are all
compatible with one another.
Analysis features
Static analysis for user specified vertical and lateral floor or story loads are possible. If floor
elements with plate bending capability are modeled, vertical uniform loads on the floor are
transferred to the beams and columns through bending of the floor elements. Otherwise, vertical
uniform loads on the floor are automatically converted to span loads on adjoining beams, or point
loads on adjacent columns, thereby automating the tedious task of transferring floor tributary
loads to the floor beams without explicit modeling of the secondary framing. The program can
automatically generate lateral wind and seismic load patterns to meet the requirements of various
building codes. Three-dimensional mode shapes and frequencies, modal participation factors,
direction factors and participating mass percentage are evaluated using eigenvector. P-Delta
effects may be included with static or dynamic analysis. Response spectrum analysis, linear time
history analysis, nonlinear time history analysis, and static nonlinear (pushover) analysis are all
possible. The static nonlinear capabilities also allow you to perform incremental construction
analysis so that forces that arise as a result of the construction sequence are included. Result
from the various static load conditions may be combined with each other or with the result from
the dynamic response spectrum or time history analysis. Output may be viewed graphically,
displayed in tabular output, sent to a printer, exported to a database file, or saved in an ASCII file.
Types of output include reactions and member forces, mode shapes and participation factors,
static and dynamic story displacements and story shears, inter story drifts and joint
displacements, time history traces, and more.
Shell element internal forces
The shell element internal forces, like stresses, act throughout the element. They are present at
every point on the mid surface of the shell element. ETABS reports values for the shell internal
forces at the element nodes. It is important to note that the internal forces are reported as forces
and moments per unit of in-plane length. The basic shell element forces and moments are
identified as F11, F22, F12, M11, M22, M12, V13 and V23. You might expect that there would also be an
F21 and M21, but F21 is always equal to F12 and M21 is always equal to M12, so it is not actually
necessary to report F21and M21.
Conclusion
Materials problem is a great problem in our country especially the shortage of constriction raw
materials in our country. This thesis is based on the previously discussed topics.
This thesis may result an effective solution of this problem.
ANALYTICAL STUDY
General:
The analysis is made by using ETABS finite element package. Analysis was made for two
different types of building systems. One is beam column slab system and another is flat plate slab
system. Total ten loads combination was considered for design of different elements of the
building. The whole analysis and design was performed based on ACI and BNBC code.
The Building Geometry
The building geometries are as follows:
Option I:
All the floors have 16 columns. All the slabs of the structure are beam supported. Story height is
10 ft. column and beam size is different. The layout is shown in figure 3.2
Option II:
All the floors have 16 columns. All the slabs are directly supported on column (Flat Plate
structure). Column size is different. The layout is shown in figure 3.1
The Loads Considered
Dead Load, D. L = 50 psf (for wall)
Floor Finish, F. F = 30 psf
Live Load, L. L = 40 psf
Load Combination
COMB 1 = 1.4 D.L
COMB 2 = 1.4 D.L + 1.7 L.L
COMB 3 = 0.75 (1.4 D.L + 1.7 L.L + 1.7 WLX)
COMB 4 = 0.75 (1.4 D.L + 1.7 L.L. 1.7 WLX)
COMB 5 = 0.75 (1.4 D.L + 1.7 L.L + 1.7 WLY)
COMB 6 = 0.75 (1.4 D.L + 1.7 L.L 1.7 WLY)
COMB 7 = 0.75 (1.4 D.L + 1.7 L.L + 1.87 ELX)
= Dead load
L.L
= Live load
Figure 3.1: Option II (Typical floor plan of the flat plate structure).
Wind Load Calculation
This load is a function of the wind speed which in turn is depended on the location of the building,
the exposure of the location, gusting effect, importance of the building and the geometry of the
building. Wind load calculations were done by UBC 94 codes by ETABS. The wind speed was
adjusted to convert it to BNBC code. In this study, wind load was calculated by the diaphragms
method.
Input data
Windward Coefficient, Cq = 1.4
Leeward Coefficient, Cq 0
Wind Speed, V = 210 km / hr (131.25 mph)
Exposure Type = B, Importance Factor = 1.0
Along X axis, Wind Direction Angle = 00
Along Y axis, Wind Direction Angle = 900
Velocity adjustment
The table below shows the reaction due to wind load in X and Y direction.
Table 3.1: ETABS output value for reaction forces:
Story
Load
Fx
Fy
BASE
WLX
- 7.56
- 0.27
BASE
WLY
0.27
- 8.11
BASE
WLX
- 10.27
- 0.20
BASE
WLY
0.20
- 8.03
BASE
WLX
- 10.68
- 0.20
BASE
WLY
- 0.20
- 8.03
BASE
WLX
- 8.11
- 0.27
BASE
WLY
- 0.27
- 8.11
BASE
WLX
- 8.03
- 0.20
BASE
WLY
- 0.20
- 10.68
BASE
WLX
- 10.63
- 0.15
Load
Fx
Fy
BASE
WLY
- 0.15
- 10.63
BASE
WLX
- 10.33
- 0.15
BASE
WLY
0.15
- 10.63
BASE
WLX
-7.64
- 0.20
BASE
WLY
0.20
- 10.68
BASE
WLX
- 7.64
0.20
BASE
WLY
0.20
- 10.27
BASE
WLX
- 7.56
0.27
BASE
WLY
0.27
- 7.56
BASE
WLX
- 10.33
0.15
BASE
WLY
0.15
- 10.33
BASE
WLX
- 10.27
0.20
BASE
WLY
0.20
-7.64
BASE
WLX
- 10.63
0.15
BASE
WLY
- 0.15
- 10.33
BASE
WLX
- 10.68
0.20
BASE
WLY
- 0.20
- 7.64
BASE
WLX
- 8.03
0.20
BASE
WLY
- 0.20
- 10.27
BASE
WLX
- 8.11
0.27
BASE
WLY
- 0.27
-7.56
Summation
WLX
- 146.48
Summation
WLY
- 146.48
height
Vb 2
qz
Pz
Pz
H(m)
Cc
Ci
cz
210
(KN/m2)
Cg
Cp
(KN/m2)
(psf)
(sft)
(Kips)
F-1
3.05
4.7E-5
0.37
44100
0.76
1.38
1.4
1.48
30.92
250
7.73
F-2
6.1
4.7E-5
0.41
44100
0.86
1.38
1.4
1.68
35.08
500
17.54
F-3
9.15
4.7E-5
0.50
44100
1.03
1.38
1.4
2.01
41.97
500
20.99
F-4
12.2
4.7E-5
0.57
44100
1.17
1.38
1.4
2.28
47.77
500
23.89
F-5
15.24
4.7E-5
0.63
44100
1.30
1.38
1.4
2.52
52.74
500
26.37
F-6
18.3
4.7E-5
0.68
44100
1.41
1.38
1.4
2.74
57.29
500
28.65
Summation of F
125.16
Load
Fx
Fy
BASE
WLX
- 6.44
- 0.25
BASE
WLY
0.25
- 6.94
BASE
WLX
- 8.75
- 0.14
BASE
WLY
0.2
- 6.83
BASE
WLX
- 9.15
- 0.14
Table 3.3: The table below shows the reaction due to wind load in X and Y direction after
correction of wind speed (continued).
Design of beam supported slab
Design code: ACI.
Design method: USD
Design procedure: Direct design method
Slab system: Beam supported slab.
Material properties: fy = 60 ksi; fc= 3.5 ksi
Figure 3.2: Option I (Typical floor plan of the beam supported structure)
Calculation of slab thickness:
Let, slab thickness h = 6 inch.
Beam size
= 10 in * 16 in.
The 3.50 in limitation clearly does not control in this case. 6 in. depth is ok.
Factored load, W = 285 psf.
For 15 ft * 15 ft panel:
Slab beam strip centered on the Interior column line.
Mo = 0.285 * 17.50 *14.17 * 1 / 8 = 137 ft kip.
Interior negative moment: 137 * 0.70 = 96 ft-kip
Positive moment: 137 * 0.57 = 78 ft kip
Exterior negative moment: 137 * 0.16 = 22 ft kip.
The torsional constant, C = {1 (0.63 * 10 / 10)16 * 10 / 3 + {1 (0.63*6 / 10)10 * 6 / 3
= 3681 in4
Now, l2 / l1 = 1; 1l2 / l1 = 1.81; t = 3681 / (2*3780) = 0.50
Exterior negative moment 90%, positive moment 75%, Interior negative moment 75% is taken by
column strip.
The table below is showing slab strip moment at different locations for 15*15 panel.
Table 3.5: Slab-beam strip centered on the Interior column line.
Slab-beam strip
kip
Exterior negative moment
2.2
Positive moment
20
11
24
Slab-beam strip at the edge of the building:Mo = 0.285 * 7.92 * 14.17 * 1 / 8 = 62 ft-kips
Interior negative: 62 * 0.70 = 43 ft-kips
Positive: 62 * 0.57 = 35 ft-kips
Exterior negative: 62 * 0.16 = 10 ft-kips
Now, l2 / l1= 1; 112 / l1 = 2.99 * 1 = 2.99; t = 3681 / (2 * 1711) = 1.10
Positive moment 75%, Exterior negative moment 90%, Interior negative moment 75% is taken by
column strip.
Table 3.6: Slab-beam strip at the edge of the building: (slab, 15 * 15).
Exterior slab-beam strip
kip
ft-kip
1.50
Positive moment
11
For 15 ft * 20 ft Panel:
Slab-beam strip at the edge of the building.
Mo = 0.285 * 7.92 * 19.17 * 1 / 8 = 113 ft-kips.
Interior negative moment: 113 * 0.65 = 73.5 ft-kips
Positive moment: 113 * 0.35 = 39.5 ft-kip
Exterior negative moment: 137 * 0.16 = 22 ft-kip.
Now, l2 / l1 = 15 / 20 = 0.75; 1l2 / l1 = 2.99 * 0.75 = 2.24
Negative moment 83%, positive moment 83%, is taken by column strip.
Table 3.7: Slab-beam strips at the edge of the building (slab 15 ft * 20 ft).
Exterior Slab-beam strip (20
ft span)
kips
ft-kips
Negative moment
12.50
Positive moment
span)
ft-kips
ft-kips
Negative moment
20
28
Positive moment
11
15
For 15 ft * 15 ft panel:
The table below is showing reinforcement requirement for different strip such as column strip,
middle strip for 15*15 slab.
Table 3.9: Design of slab reinforcement.
Description
Location
Mu
Strip
Effective
Mu*12/
Steel
Required
ft-
width
depth d
density
steel area
kip
inch
As
inch
in
Exterior half
Exterior:
1.5
50
0.36
0.0022
0.55
column strip
negative
50
0.96
0.0022
0.55
positive
50
1.2
0.0022
0.55
Exterior:
2.1
90
0.28
0.0022
0.99
negative
19
90
2.53
0.0022
0.99
positive
23
90
3.1
0.0024
1.08
Interior:
negative
Middle strip
Interior:
negative
Interior half
Exterior:
1.5
45
0.4
0.0022
0.5
column strip
negative
4.5
45
1.2
0.0022
0.5
positive
5.5
45
1.5
0.0022
0.5
Interior:
negative
Exterior half
Exterior:
1.5
50
4.5
0.36
0.0024
0.54
column strip
negative
50
4.5
0.96
0.0024
0.54
positive
50
4.5
1.2
0.0024
0.54
Interior:
negative
The table below is showing reinforcement requirement for different strip such as column strip,
middle strip for 15 ft * 20 ft slab.
Table 3.10: Design of slab reinforcement.
Description
Location
Mu
Strip
Effective
ft-
width
depth of
kip
slab
inch
inch
Mu*12/b
Steel
Required
density
steel area
As in
15span two
Exterior:
75
0.48
0.0022
0.83
half column
negative
75
1.44
0.0022
0.83
strip
positive
11
75
1.76
0.0022
0.83
Exterior:
2.2
150
0.2
0.0022
1.65
negative
20
150
1.6
0.0022
1.65
positive
24
150
1.92
0.0022
1.65
Interior:
negative
Middle strip
Interior
negative
Description
Location
Mu
Strip
Effective
Mu*12/b
Steel
ft-
width
depth of
Ft-kip/ft
density
kip
slab
inch
inch
Required
steel area
As
in
Two half
Negative
20
120
0.0022
1.32
column strip
Positive
11
120
1.1
0.0022
1.32
Middle strip
Negative
28
120
2.8
0.0022
1.32
Positive
15
120
1.5
0.0022
1.32
Two half
Negative
20
120
4.5
0.0024
1.3
column strip
Positive
11
120
4.5
1.1
0.0024
1.3
Middle strip
Negative
28
120
4.5
2.8
0.0026
1.4
Positive
15
120
4.5
1.5
0.0024
1.3
figure
below
is
showing
the
reinforcement
arrangement
in
slab
Dead Load
Self wt of slab: 7.50 * 12.5
Wall Load:
50 psf
d = 5.80 in.
For exterior middle slab 20 ft*15 ft:
Long direction:
Mo = [311.25 * 15 * (20-16 / 12) ] / 8 = 203.35 ft-kip
Negative moment = 0.65 * 203.35 = 132.2 ft kip
Positive moment = 0.35 * 203.35 = 71.2 ft kip
Column strip negative moment: 0.75 * 132.20 = 99.15 ft kip
Column strip positive moment: 0.60 * 71.20 = 42.7 ft kip
Middle strip negative moment: 132.20 99.15 = 33.05 ft kip
Middle strip positive moment: 71.20 42.70
= 28.5 ft kip
Short direction:
Mo = [311.25 * 20 * (15 16 / 12)] / 8 = 145.34 ft kip
Interior negative moment = 0.70 * 145.34 = 101.74 ft kip
Interior positive moment = 0.52*145.34 = 75.58 ft kip
Exterior negative moment = 0.26 * 145.34 = 37.8 ft kip
Exterior negative column strip: 37.80 * 1 = 37.8 ft kip
Exterior negative middle strip: 0
Interior negative column strip: 101.74 * 0.75 = 76.31 ft-kip
Interior negative middle strip: 101.74 76.31 = 25.43 ft kip
Positive column strip: 0.60 * 75.58 = 45.35 ft kip
Positive middle strip: 0.40 * 75.58 = 30.23 ft kip
The table below is showing reinforcement requirement for 15 ft *15 ft panel
Table 3.13: Design of slab reinforcement in 15 ft *15 ft panel
Strip type
Moment type
Mu
Moment type
Mu
Moment type
Figure 3.4: Reinforcement arrangement in slab in flat plate structure (long direction).
Mu
Figure 3.5: Reinforcement arrangement in slab in flat plate structure (short direction).
Punching Shear Check:
For Column- C6, C7, C11, C13:
Maximum spacing = 7.50 * 20 = 15 in
Vu = 0.31125 [17.50*17.5 - (22 * 22 / 144)] = 94.27 kip
D / 2 = 6 / 2 = 3 in
bo = 4 (16+6) = 88
Since, c < 2;
Vc = 4fc * bod = 0.75 * 43500 * 0.08 * 6.50 = 101.55 kip
For Column- C1, C4, C10, C16:
Vu = 0.31125 [8.20 * 8.20 - (19 * 19 / 144)] = 20.20 kip
bo = 19+19 = 38
Vc = 4fc * bod = 0.75 * 43500 * 38 * 6.50 = 43.84 kip
For Column C2, C3, C5, C8, C9, C12, C14, C15:
Vu = 0.31125 [17.50 * 8.20 - (19 * 22 / 144)] = 44 kip
bo = 19 * 20 + 22 = 60
Vc = 4fc * bod = 69.22 kip]
Figure 3.6: Distribution of total static moment M 0 to critical section for positive and negative
bending.
Beam design
For beam design required data such as moment values, shears are taken from ETABS analysis
report shown in table and designed various beams for various floors of the beam supported
structure.
Design of the beam: B1, B3, B4, B6, B7, B9, B10, B11 ( at 6th story )
From load combination:
Maximum moment:
End section:
Negative moment = 42.61 k-ft
Mu = fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0 .75 b,
say, d = 10
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 8 / 2 = 4
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Say d = 15
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
use 2 # 8 +2 # 5 bars
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Say, d = 12
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 10 / 2 = 5
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Design of the beam: B1, B3, B4, B6, B7, B9, B10, B11 ( at 5th story )
From load combination:
Maximum moment at end section
Negative moment = 42.61 k ft
Mu = fy bd (1 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b ,
b = 0.85 1 fc / fy * 87000 / (87000 + 60000)
= 0.85 * 0.85 * 3.5 / 60 * 87000 / (87000 + 60000) = 0.02494
max = 0.75 * 0.02494 = 0.0187
d = 42.61 * 12 / 0.90 * 0.0187 * 60 * 10 (1- 0.59 * 0.0187 * 60/3.50)
d = 7.90, Clear cover = 2, Total depth = 7.90 + 2 = 9.90.
Say, d = 10
Use 3 # 5 bars
Stirrup spacing:
1) Smax = Avfy / 50 bw = (2*.11*60000) / 50 * 10 = 26.40
2) Smax = d / 2 = 8 / 2 = 4
3) Smax = 24
4) S = Avfy d / Vs = 0.85 * 2 * 0.11 * 60000 * 8 / (8.164 * 1000) = 10.99
Use stirrups # 3 bar @ 4 c/c
Design of the beam: B2, B5, B8, B12 ( at 5th story )
From load combination:
Maximum moment:
End section:
Negative moment = 80.00 k ft
Mu = fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b ,
Say, d = 15
Use 2 # 7 +2 # 5 bars
bw d So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3)
Smax = 24
4)
bw d So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 10 / 2 = 5
3)
Smax = 24
4)
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 87.25 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 1.551 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw
a = 1.551 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 3.128 in.
As = 87.25 * 12/0.90 * 60 (13 3.128 / 2) = 1.695 in
a = 1.695 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10= 3.418 in.
As = 87.25 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (10 3.418 / 2) = 1.717 in. Use 2 # 7 + 2 # 5 bars
Main steel calculation:
Mid section:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 35.0 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 0.622 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw
a = 0.622 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 1.254 in.
As = 35.00 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1.254 / 2) = 0.628 in
a = 0.628 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 1.266 in.
As = 35.0 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1.266/2) = 0.63 in. Use 2 # 6 bars
Shear reinforcement design:
Vs = Vu - Vc
= 22.23 (2 * 0.853500 * 10 * 13) / 1000 = 9.15 kip
4 fc bw d = (43500 * 10 * 13) /1000 = 30.76 kip
Vs < 4fc bw d
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1) Smax = Avfy / 50 bw = (2 * 0.11* 60000) / 50 * 10 = 26.40
2) Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3) Sma = 24
4) S = Avfy d / Vs = 0.85 * 2 * 0.11 * 60000 * 13 / (9.15 * 1000) = 15.94
Use stirrups # 3 bar @ 6 c/c
Design of the beam: B2, B5, B8, B12 ( at 4th story )
From load combination:
Maximum moment:
End section:
Negative moment = 108.93 k-ft
Mu = fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b, b = 0.85 1 fc / fy * 87000 / (87000 + 60000)
= 0.85 * 0.85 * 3.5 / 60 * 87000 / (87000 + 60000) = 0.02494
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3)
Smax = 24
4)
bw d So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 10 / 2 = 5
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Vs = Vu - Vc
= 22.23 (2 * 0.853500 * 10 * 13) / 1000 = 9.15 kip
4 fc bw d = (43500 * 10 * 13) /1000 = 30.76 kip
Vs < 4fc bw d
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1) Smax = Avfy / 50 bw = (2 * 0.11* 60000) / 50 * 10 = 26.40
2) Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3) Sma = 24
4) S = Avfy d / Vs = 0.85 * 2 * 0.11 * 60000 * 13 / (9.15 * 1000) = 15.94
Use stirrups # 3 bar @ 6 c/c
Design of the beam: B2, B5, B8, B12 ( at 4th story )
From load combination:
Maximum moment:
End section:
Negative moment = 108.93 k-ft
Mu = fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b, b = 0.85 1 fc / fy * 87000 / (87000 + 60000)
= 0.85 * 0.85 * 3.5 / 60 * 87000 / (87000 + 60000) = 0.02494
max = 0.75 * 0.02494 = 0.0187
d = 108.93 * 12 / 0.90 * 0.0187 * 60 * 10(1- 0.59 * 0.0187 * 60 / 3.50)
d = 12.63, Clear cover = 2, Total depth = 12.63 + 2 = 14.63. Say, d = 15
Provided Beam size = 15 * 10, d = 15- 2= 13
Main steel calculation:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 108.93 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 1.936 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw,
a = 1.936 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 3.904 in.
As = 108.93 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 3.904 / 2) = 1.867 in
a = 1.897 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 3.765 in.
As = 108.93 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 3.765 / 2) = 2.177 in. Use 2 # 8 +2 # 5 bars
Main steel calculation:
Mid section:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 59.56 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 1.058 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw,
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3)
Smax = 24
4)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1) Smax = Avfy / 50 bw = (2 * 0.11 * 60000) / 50 * 10 = 26.40
2) Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3) Smax = 24
4) S = Avfyd / Vs = 0.85 * 2 * 0.11 * 60000 * 13 / (13.825 * 1000) = 10.55
Use stirrups # 3 bar @ 6 c/c
2) Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3) Smax = 24
4) S = Avfy d / Vs = 0.85 * 2 * 0.11 * 60000 * 16 / (24.28 * 1000) = 7.39 in
Use stirrups # 3 bar @ 7 c/c
Design of the beam: B13, B15, B16, B18, B19, B21, B22, B24 (at 3rd story)
From load combination:
Maximum moment at end section
Negative moment = 115.36 k ft
Mu = fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / (fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b, b = 0.85 1 fc / fy * 87000 / (87000 + 60000)
= 0.85 * 0.85 * 3.5 / 60 * 87000 / (87000+60000) = 0.02494
max = 0.75 * 0.02494 = 0.0187
d = 115.36 * 12 / 0.90 * 0.0187 * 60 *10 (1- 0.59 * 0.0187 * 60 / 3.50)
d = 13.0, Clear cover = 2, Total depth = 13+2 = 15.0. Say, d = 15
Provided Beam size = 15 * 10, d = 15- 2= 13
Main steel calculation:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 115.36 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 2.05 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw.
a = 2.05 * 60 / 0.85*3.5*10 = 4.134 in.
As = 115.36 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 4.134 / 2) = 2.344 in.
a = 2.344 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.5 * 10 = 4.727 in.
As = 115.36 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 4.727 / 2) = 2.41 in. Use 2 # 8 +2 # 6 bars
Main steel calculation:
Mid section:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 48.69 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 0.865 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw,
a = 0.865 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 1.744 in.
As = 48.69 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1.744 / 2) = 0.892 in
a = 0.892 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.5 * 10 = 1.798 in
As = 48.69 * 12/0.90 * 60 (13 1.798 / 2) = 0.894 in. Use 3 # 5 bars
Shear reinforcement design:
Vs = Vu - Vc
= 32.18 (2 * 0.853500 * 10 * 13) / 1000 = 19.10 kip
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrups Spacing:
1) Smax = Avfy / 50 bw = (2 * 0.11 * 60000) / 50 * 10 = 26.40
2) Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3) Smax = 24
4) S = Avfy d / Vs = 0.85 * 2 * 0.11 * 60000 * 13 / (17.412 * 1000) = 8.37
Use stirrups # 3 bar @ 6 c/c
Design of the beam: B14, B17, B20, B23 ( at 2nd story )
From load combination:
Maximum moment at end section
Negative moment = 169.91 k-ft
Mu = fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / ( fy bd (1- 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b, b = 0.85 1 fc / fy * 87000 / (87000 + 60000)
= 0.85 * 0.85 * 3.5 / 60 * 87000 / (87000 + 60000) = 0.02494
max = 0.75 * 0.02494 = 0.0187
d = 169.91 * 12 / 0.90 * 0.0187 * 60 * 12 (1-0.59 * 0.0187 * 60 / 3.50)
d = 14.40, Clear cover = 2, Total depth = 14.40+2 = 16.40. Say, d = 18
Provided Beam size = 18 * 12, d = 18- 2= 16
Main steel calculation:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 169.91 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (16 1 / 2) = 2.43 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw
a = 2.43 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 12 = 4.08 in.
As = 169.91*12 / 0.90 * 60 (16 4.08 / 2) = 2.70 in
a = 2.70 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 12 = 4.54 in.
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3)
Smax = 24
4)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Mu = fy bd (1 0.59 fy / fc)
d = Mu / fy bd (1 0.59 fy / fc)
max = 0.75 b , b = 0.85 1 fc / fy * 87000 / (87000 + 60000)
= 0.85 * 0.85 * 3.5 / 60 * 87000 / (87000 + 60000) = 0.02494
max = 0.75 * 0.02494 = 0.0187
d = 114.44 * 12 / 0.90 * 0.0187 * 60 * 10 (1 0.59 * 0.0187 * 60 / 3.50)
d = 12.95, Clear cover = 2, Total depth = 12.95+2 = 14.95. Say, d = 15
Provided Beam size = 15 * 10, d = 15- 2= 13
Main steel calculation:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 114.44 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 2.034 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw
a = 2.034 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.5 * 10 = 4.102 in.
As = 114.44 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 4.102 / 2) = 2.322 in
a = 2.322 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.5 * 10 = 4.683 in
As = 114.44 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 4.683 / 2) = 2.386 in. Use 2 # 9 +2 # 5 bars
Main steel calculation:
Mid section:
As = Mu / fy (d a / 2)
= 60.52 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 1 / 2) = 1.075 in, a = Asfy / 0.85fc bw
a = 1.075 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.5 * 10 = 2.168 in.
As = 60.52 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 2.168 / 2) = 1.128 in
a = 1.128 * 60 / 0.85 * 3.50 * 10 = 2.274 in
As = 60.52 * 12 / 0.90 * 60 (13 2.274 / 2) = 1.133 in. Use 4 # 5 bars
Shear reinforcement design:
Vs = Vu Vc
= 24.47 (2 * 0.853500 * 10 * 13) / 1000 = 17.412 kip
4 fc bw d = (43500 * 10 * 13) / 1000 = 30.763 kip
Vs < 4fc bw d
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 16 / 2 = 8
3)
Smax = 24
4)
So, ok
Stirrup spacing:
1)
2)
Smax = d / 2 = 13 / 2 = 6
3)
Smax = 24
4)
Ag = 173.076 in2 Or
Ag = 10 * 18
2
Or
As = 4.04 in2
Tie design:
Spacing: S = 16 D = 16 * 6 / 8 = 12 c/c, S = 48 d = 48 * 3 / 8 = 18 c/c
At least lateral dimension,
Y Axis:
= 13 / 18 = 0.72, ex = Mx / P = 56.093 * 12 / 329.81= 2.04 in
ey = My / P = 1.78 * 12/329.81 = 0.06 in, ex / h = 2.04 / 18 = 0.113
Reinforcement Ratio: g =As / A g = 4.04 / 180 = 0.022
From Graph: Pn yo / fc Ag = 0.91
Or
Po / fc Ag = 1.11 Or
X Axis:
= 5 / 10 = 0.5,
639.18 = 2.288 Ag
Tie design:
Spacing: S = 16 D = 16 * 6 / 8 = 12 c/c, S = 48 d = 48 * 3 / 8 = 18 c/c
At least lateral dimension: S = 12 c/c, Use # 3 bar ties @ 12 c/c.
Y Axis:
As = 11.08 in2
Tie design:
Spacing: S = 16 D = 16 * 9/8 = 18 c/c, S = 48 d = 48 * 3/8 = 18 c/c
At least lateral dimension: S = 18 c/c, use # 3 bar ties @ 18 c/c.
Y Axis:
= 21 / 26 = 0.80, ex = Mx / P = 0.971 * 12 / 865.56 = 0.013 in
ey = My / P = 61.64 * 12 / 865.56 = 0.85 in, ex / h = 0.013 / 26 = 0.0005
Or
As = 3.92 in2
X Axis:
= 10 / 15 = 0.67, ex = Mx / P = 4.87 in, ey = My / P = 0.17 in
ey / h = 0.17 / 15 = 0.011
Reinforcement Ratio:
g = As / A g = 0.018
From Graph:
Pn xo / fc Ag = 1.06 Or Pn xo = 1.06 * 3.50 * 225 = 834.75 kips
Po / fc Ag =1.09
Here
Or
1/ Pn = 1 / Pnxo + 1 / Pnyo 1 / Po
Pu = Pn.
Or
Or Pn = 411.70 kips
Pu = 0.65 * 411.70
So design is ok.
Design of the Column : C2, C3, C5, C8, C9, C12, C14, C15
From load combination:
Pu = 469.38 Kips = 469.38 * 1.20 = 563.25 Kips
Now,
Or
Ag = 246.18 in2
Or Ag =12 *24
Provided Column size =12 *24
Ag = 288 in2
Main steel calculation:
Pu = (0 .85 fc (Ag - As) + Asfy)
Or 563.25 = 0.80 * 0.65 (0.85 * 3.50 (288 As) + As * 60)
Or
As = 4.04 in2
X Axis:
= 7 / 12 = 0.58, ex = Mx / P = 2.42 in, ey = My / P = 0.065 in
ey / h = 0.85 / 18 = 0.047
Reinforcement ratio: g =As / A g = 0.014
From Graph: Pn xo / fc Ag = 1.04
Or Pn xo = 1.04 * 3.50 * 288 = 1048.32 kips
Po / fc Ag = 1.04
Here
Or
1 / Pn = 1 / Pnxo + 1 / Pnyo 1 / Po
Pn = 869.56 kips
Now,
Or
Pu = Pn. Or
Pu = 0.65 * 869.56
Or
Or
1505.84 = 2.44 Ag Or
Ag = 617.15 in Or
Ag = 22 * 30
Or
Or
As = 16.35 in2
Pn yo / fc Ag = 1.108
Or
X Axis:
= 17 / 22 = 0.77, ex = Mx / P = 0.045 in, ey = My / P = 1.51 in
ey / h = 1.51 / 22 = 0.0686
Reinforcement ratio:
g = As / A g = 0.026
Here
1 / Pn = 1 / Pnxo + 1 / Pnyo 1 / Po
Pn = 2341.31kips
Now,
Or
Pu = Pn. Or
Pu = 0.65 * 2341.31
So design is ok.
The table below is showing size of different columns of the flat plate structure
Table 3.17: Cross section of the column elements for flat plate structure.
COMPARATIVE STUDY:
General:
The buildings are analyzed for determine the best condition which can be constructed
economically. The behavior of each condition is observed carefully. Then suitable condition is
selected and suitable dimensions as well as steel area are also determined. The chapter gives a
comparative of the material, dimensions etc required for both the options I building and potion II
building. It is obvious that the amount of material required for option I building will be higher than
the option II building. But the option I building got beam free floor height. Due to this beam free
space, looks nice and the floor will be heavily reinforced and it will be durable.
Comparison Between the Two Types of Structure:
The comparison is made in terms of element dimension, volume of concrete and steel
requirement, their cost and economic view.
Dimension of different parts of beam supported structure and flat pate structure:
Table 4.1: Dimension of different portion of the flat plate structure and beam-supported
structure.
Element
Column no
Option I building
Option II building
Table 4.1: Dimension of different portion of the flat plate structure and beam-supported structure
(continued).
Element
Column size
Option I building
Option II building
1.
C1,C4,C10,C16:
Size = 18 * 10
2. C2,C3,C5,C8,C9,C12,C14,C15
Column
1.
C1,C4,C10,C16:
Size = 15 * 15
2. C2,C3,C5,C8,C9,C12,C14,C15
Size = 24 * 12
3. C6,C7,C11,C13:
Size = 24 * 12
3. C6,C7,C11,C13:
Size = 26 * 18
Size = 30 * 22
Beams
Slab
height
thickness
Required concrete volume for beam supported structure and flat plate structure:
Table 4.2: Comparative concrete volumes.
Element
Column
Option I building
Option II building
375.00 cftColumn: C2, C3, C5, C8, C9, C12, C14, C15= 8 * 6 *
960.00 cft
= 4 * 6 * 1- 6 * 2- 2 * 10- 0 =
779.76 cft
Total R.C.C = 2072.88 cft.
Table 4.2: Comparative concrete volumes (continued)
Element
Beams
Option I building
Option II building
None
= 1 * 15 * 10 * 18 0 * 4
= 75.00 cft
Beam: B14, B17, B20, B23
= (1 * 18 * 10 * 17-10 * 2) + (1 * 1810 * 18-5 * 2)
= 90.83 cft
Beam: B13, B15, B16, B18, B19, B21, B22, B24
= 1 * 12 * 10 * 13-5 * 8
= 89.46 cft
Total R.C.C = 75.46 + 75.00 + 90.83 + 89.46 = 330.75
cft
Table 4.2: Comparative concrete volumes (continued).
Element
Beams
Option I building
Option II building
None
= 1 * 15 * 10 * 13 7 * 8
= 113.17 cft
Beam: B2, B5, B8, B12
=1 * 15 * 10 * 18 0 * 4
= 75.00 cft
Beam: B14, B17, B20, B23
= (1 * 18 * 10 * 17- 10 * 2) + (1 * 18 *10 * 18- 5 * 2)
= 90.83 cft
Beam: B13, B15, B16, B18, B19, B21, B22, B24
= 1 * 15 * 10 * 13-5 * 8
= 113.17 cft
Total R.C.C = 113.17 + 75.00 + 90.83 + 113.17 = 392.17 cft
(3rd + 4TH) Floor R.C.C = 2 * 392.17 = 784.34 cft
R.C.C Beam at 2nd Story:
Beam: B1, B3, B4, B6, B7, B9, B10, B11
= 1 * 15 * 12 * 13- 7 * 8
= 135.80 cft
Beam: B2, B5, B8, B12
= 1 * 15 * 10 * 18- 0 * 4
= 75.00 cft
Beam: B14, B17, B20, B23
Beam
Option I building
Option II building
= (1 * 18 * 12*17- 10 * 2) + (1 * 18 * 12 * 18-5 *
None
2)= 108.99 cftBeam: B13, B15, B16, B18, B19, B21, B22,
B24= 1 * 15 * 10 * 13-5 * 8
= 113.17 cft
Total R.C.C = 135.80 + 75.00 + 108.99 +
113.17 = 432.96 cft
(1st + 2nd) Floor R.C.C = 2 * 432.96 =
865.92 cft
Total R.C.C = 135.80 + 75.00 + 108.99 +
113.17 = 432.96 cft
(1st + 2nd) Floor R.C.C = 2 * 432.96 =
865.92 cft
Slab
Required steel volume for beam supported structure and flat plate structure.
Table 4.3: Comparative steel volumes.
Element
Column
Option I building
Option II building
= 49 * 4 * 4- 4= 849.26 rft
= 512 rft
# 3 bars @ 10 c/c
4 # 8 bars = 4 * 8 * 65- 0
= 4 * (73 * 4- 0 + 73 * 0- 11)
= 2080 rft
= 1435.48 rft
2 # 6 bars = 2 * 8 * 64 0
= 1024 rft
4 # 8 Bars = 4 * 8 * 65- 0
= 2080 rft
1) = 3131 rft
8 # 6 Bars = 8 * 8 * 64- 0
= 512 rft
4 # 10 Bars = 4 * 4 * 66- 4
= 4096 rft
= 1061.28 rft
# 3 Bars @ 12 c/c
12 # 9 bars = 12 * 4 * 65- 6
= 3144 rft
rft
Element
Column
Option I building
Option II building
=11977.00 kg
= 11.98 ton
# 3 bars @ 18 c/c
= 41* 4 * (6- 8+2- 3+ 4- 2) =
2145.55 rft
# 8 bars = 3120 rft = 3666 kg
# 6 bars = 4608 rft = 3464 kg
# 9 Bars = 1572 rft = 2318 kg
# 10 bars = 1061.28 rft = 2043 kg
# 3 bars = 8704.22 rft = 1635 kg
Total M.S Rod = 13126.00 kg
Total R.C.C = 2072.88 cft
Total M.S Rod =13126 kg
=13.126 ton
Beam
M.S Rod of beam at 6th Story:Beam: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7,
None
Beam
Option I building
Option II building
None
Beam
Option I building
Option II building
None
B10, B11
Top Bars: 2 # 5
= 2 * 51.17 * 4 = 409.36 ft * 0.481 =
196.90 kg
Bottom bars: 3 # 5
= 1 * 51.17 * 3 * 4 = 614.04 ft * 0.481 =
295.35 kg
Extra top end: 4 # 6
= 1 * 5.92 * 4 * 8 = 189.44 ft * 0.75 =
142.46 kg
Extra top mid: 2 # 9
= 1 * 9.5 * 2 * 8 = 152.00 ft * 1.536 =
233.47 kg
Stirrups # 3 bars @ 6.50 C/C
= 85 * 3.75 * 4 = 1275 ft * 0.188 =
239.70 kg
Beam: B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20,
B21, B22, B23, B24
Top bars: 2 # 5
Table 4.3: Comparative steel volumes (continued..).
Element
Beam
Option I building
Option II building
None
233.47 kg
= 2 * 9.5 * 8 = 152.00 ft * 0.752 = 114.30
kg
= 1*15* 8= 120.00 ft *0.481
= 57.72
Stirrups # 3 bars @ 6.50 C/C
= 85 * 3.75 * 8 = 2550.00 ft * 0.188 =
479.40 kg
Total = 3077.43 kg
6th Story = 2139.60 kg
1st Story = 3077.43 kg
Total = 5217.03 kg
Beam
Option I building
Option II building
None
Slab
= 1012 ft
6 * (4.1+ 16 / 12)
15 ft*20 ft slab:
4.16 * (8+15) = 96 ft
12 * (4.1+ 8 / 12)
5 * (6+13+5) * 2 = 240 ft
= 199.7 ft.
20 * (6+9+5) = 400 ft
= 1209 ft
7 * (3+ 16/12)
20 ft*20 ft slab:
7 * (3+ 8/12)
20 * (12+12) = 480 ft
20*(12+12) = 480 ft
= 165.83 ft.
= 1628 ft
Slab
Option I building
Option II building
2 * (5.6 + 8/12)
= 137.87 ft (-ve)
11 * 2 * (3.74+ 8/12)
= 96.82
= 180 + 137.87 + 96.82
= 414.69 ft.
4: 7 * 20 = 140 ft (+ve)
= 206.73 ft.
5: 9 * 15.7 = 141.3 ft (+ve)
7 * (5.6+ 16/12)
= 48.53 ft (Ex. ve)
8 * (5.6+ 8/12)
= 50.13 ft (In. ve)
7 * (3.74+ 8/12)
= 30.85 ft (In. ve)
=141.3+48.53 +50.13 + 30.85
= 270.81 ft.
6: 11 * 15.7 = 172.7 ft (+ve)
11 * (4.1+ 16/12)
= 59.77 ft (Ex. ve)
= 172.7 + 59.77 = 284.9 ft.
For Panel 2: 414.69 * 2 + 206.73 +
270.81 * 2 + 284.9 = 1862.63 ft.
Option I building
Option II building
Slab
= 114.57 ft (-ve)
= 175.5 + 114.57 = 510.1 ft.
7L: 12 * 20 = 240 ft (+ve)
14 * 2 * (5.6+ 8/12)
= 175.5 ft (-ve)
13 * 2 * (3.74+ 8/12)
= 114.57 ft (-ve)
= 240 +175.5 +114.57= 530.1 ft.
8S: 9 * 20 = 180 ft (+ve)
9 * 2 * (4.1+ 8 / 12)
= 85.8 ft (-ve)
= 180 + 85.80 = 265.8 ft.
8L: 265.8 ft.
For panel 3: 510.10 * 2 + 265.8 + 530.10
* 2 + 265.8 = 2612 ft
Total steel: 1078.32 * 4 + 1862.63 * 4 +
2612 = 14376 ft
= 19.67 cft = 4.38 ton.
Total steel in slab for six stories
= 1 * 4.38 * 6 = 26.28 ton
Short
Uni
Total
Rate
Amount (Tk.)
description
Option I:
Beam supported structure
(Tk.)
i. Ground
Floor
201
406576.77
cft
2022.77
cft
2022.77
205
414667.85
cft
2022.77
209
422758.93
cft
2022.77
213
430850.01
v. 4th Floor
cft
2022.77
217
438941.09
cft
2022.77
221
447032.17
Tk.25,60,826.82
Table 4.5: Cost analysis for volume of concrete of flat plate structure.
Sl. no.
Short
Uni
description
Total
Rate
Amount (Tk.)
(Tk.)
i. Ground Floor
cft
2052.80
201
412612.80
cft
2052.80
205
420824.00
cft
2052.80
209
429035.20
cft
2052.80
213
437246.40
v. 4th Floor
cft
2052.80
217
445457.60
cft
2052.80
221
453668.80
Tk.25,98,844.80
The cost analyses of the both structures are summarized in table below.
Table 4.6: Cost analysis for volume of 60 grade deformed bar (steel) of beam supported
structure.
Sl. no.
Short
Uni
Total
Rate
Amount (Tk.)
description
Option I: Beam supported
i. Ground Floor
(Tk.)
Kg
5450
structure
86.9
474095.50
9
ii. 1st Floor
Kg
5450
87.2
475403.50
3
iii. 2nd Floor
Kg
5450
87.4
476711.50
7
iv. 3rd Floor
Kg
5450
87.7
478019.50
1
v. 4th Floor
Kg
5450
87.9
479327.50
5
vi. 5th Floor
Kg
5450
88.1
480635.50
9
Total costing for concrete works =
Tk.28,64,193.00
Table 4.7: Cost analysis for volume of 60 grade deformed bar (steel) for flat plate
structure.
Sl. no.
Short
Uni
description
i. Ground Floor
Kg
Total
Rate
Amount (Tk.)
(Tk.)
6050
structure
86.9
526289.50
9
ii. 1st Floor
Kg
6050
87.2
527741.50
3
iii. 2nd Floor
Kg
6050
87.4
529193.50
7
iv. 3rd Floor
Kg
6050
87.7
1
530645.50
Kg
v. 4th Floor
6050
87.9
532097.50
5
Kg
6050
88.1
533549.50
9
Total costing for concrete works =
Grand Total (I+II) =
Tk.31,79,517.00
Tk.11,203,381.62
The table below is showing total concrete requirement, steel requirement and cost difference for
flat plate structure and beam-supported structure.
Table 4.8: Summary of cost analyses for both structures
Type of
Total
Total
Total costing
Total costing
structure
volume of
volume of
of concrete
of steel works
concrete
steel
works
works
works
(Tk)
(Tk)
25,60,826.82
28,64,193.00
Remarks
(cft)
(kg)
Beam
12136.64
32700.00
About 6.5
supported
% more
structure
cost
Flat plate
12316.80
36300.00
25,98,844.80
31,79,517.00
structure
required for
flat plate
structure
a)
From the Finite Element Analysis result it can be said that the internal forces in the flat plate
The construction of flat plate structure requires more construction material which results in
more cost. Such as, concrete requirement increased in flat plate structure about 1.5% and steel
requirement about 11% and finally increased cost of 6.5% than beam supported structure.
c)
In case of flat plate structure interior space of building looks nice, due to absence of beams
offset. Flat plate slab is thicker and more heavily reinforced than slabs with beams and girders.
d)
It is apparent from the cost comparison that the difference between two estimates is very
insignificant and moreover this difference is for only frame of the building. The cost per unit area
for finishing items will remain same for all cases. In compare to the enormous benefit that can be
gained for aesthetic view and also for light provision, the cost increase in this case is very
insignificant.
References:
1.
ACI Code, 1995, USA
2.
ETABS -Version 8.2.7
3.
BNBC (1993), Bangladesh National Building Code 1st edition, city Art Press,
Bangladesh.
4. Design of concrete structure- 13 th edition by Arthur H. Nilson, David Darwin, Charles W.
Dolan.
1.
Schedule of Rate for Civil works, 11th edition, Public works department,
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, 21 st November. 2008.