Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Mathematical Competence
of people with Down Syndrom *)
Mag. Bernadette Wieser
Anita Hotter
Index of contents
3
3
4
4
5
7
7
8
9
10
11
11
12
13
13
14
14
15
19
19
20
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
26
29
30
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
36
The early construct of actual possible applications in the personal life style of the
individual with Down Syndrome can yield positive access to the problem-oriented
world of mathematics.
2. Methodology
The theory of method introduced as part of the EU-project Yes we can is described
in detail in a handbook and DVD; the supporting materials are contained in a toolbox.
In the following, the essential elements of the concept are briefly summarized.
The concept of calculating with the fingers is based on the system of using the
fingers to count from left to right.
Beginning with the fists, that represent naught or zero, and with verbal
accompaniment, the number sequence is built consecutively up and down from the
little finger of the left hand to the little finger of the right hand.
The left little finger represents 1.
The left ring finger represents 2.
The left middle finger represents 3
The left index finger represents 4.
The left thumb represents 5.
The right thumb represents 6.
The right index finger represents 7.
The right middle finger represents 8.
The right ring finger represents 9.
The right little finger represents 10.
The tens are initially represented by small sticks and, as internalization progresses,
by the knuckle bones. Elimination of the use of the fingers and hands then proceeds
step by step until visual controls are entirely abandoned.
Within the number series through 10, counting upwards enables addition; counting
downwards, subtraction. By splitting up the numbers and by analogy, one can extend
the series step by step to 100.
5
3. Communication
From social psychologist Kurt Lewin we have the assessment: Nothing is as
practical as a good theory.
The successful application of calculating with the fingers as explained herein builds
upon a well-founded theoretical documentation that describes both
neuropsychological aspects and current scholarly studies in brain research with
respect to the influence of counting on fingers on the development of numerical
cognition. The concept numerical cognition embraces all of those mental processes
that have to do with the understanding and processing of numbers (verbalized
numerical expressions or written Arabic numerals) as well as with mathematical
operations (figuring in ones head or written calculations). (Landerl et al., 2008,
p. 14)
The didactical starting point for the effective pedagogical communication of numerical
competence lies first of all in the additional honing of the supporting skills, and
secondly in the communication of counting and calculating skills based on the
premise of finger calculation.
Tactile and kinaesthetic perceptions are closely coupled. The deliberate and
coordinated finger movements of counting and calculating first of all impart
information about the position and conduct of the fingers, and secondly about the
direction and speed of their movement. Likewise the energy with which the individual
fingers are extended and withdrawn must be carefully measured.
These motor-coordinative achievements support not only graphomotoric
development, but also the proper holding of writing utensils; they likewise control the
accuracy of precision movements.
Balance perception via the vestibular system contributes substantially to eye-hand
coordination (which is trained by means of deliberate finger movements) and to the
comprehension of spatial relationships. A. Jean Ayres (2002) refers to tactilekinaesthetic and vestibular perception as the sensomotoric foundation of
development.
Individuals with Down Syndrome frequently display contradictory reactions when
processing stimuli from the tactile system. On the one hand, a hypo-sensibility may
give the impression that they are insensitive to pain. On the other hand, a hypersensibility causes them to object to contact with materials such as sand, cream or
modelling clay.
Likewise, their fine motor skills in the use of their fingers and hands are in many ways
only modestly developed. In addition to everyday activities, the execution of the
requisite motion models for counting and calculating with fingers quite specifically
supports the development of hand language; furthermore, the perception of physical
stimuli is heightened.
10
3.1.4 Invariability
Invariability, which is described as a quantitative constant, provides us with the
faculty to recognize that which changes and that which remains the same. It is a
component of comparative thinking and is experienced when procedures reverse.
Understanding constancy (invariability) is possible only if one recognizes the
connection between those attributes that remain constant and those that do not.
(Garner, 2009, p. 64)
Exercises to determine volume, quantity, length, weight, number and area prepare
individuals with Down Syndrome to form mental images and likewise assist in the
further processing of abstract concepts. Reverse procedures are subject to imagery
and are internalized.
11
12
3.1.7 Intermodality
The interplay of all senses, the arranging of sensations and stimuli, is referred to as
sensory integration; the sequentially temporal linking of multiple sensory
impressions into a meaningful whole, as intermodality.
For individuals with Down Syndrome, the simultaneous processing of multiple pieces
of information and the ensuing structured processing present enormous challenges.
Through the demands of counting and calculating with fingers, the furtherance of
intermodality provides useful opportunities to practice and learn.
Intermodal performance requires the implementation of a connection and a flexible
exchange between individual areas of perception, as when hearing a number
(auditory perception) and in turn producing the appropriate number of fingers (tactile
and visual perception).
3.1.8 Abstraction
The word abstraction is derived from the Latin abstractus and means excluded.
Consequently, abstraction is used to designate the exclusion of concrete, tangible
and obvious details, in the sense of internalisation and generalisation.
According to Aebli, the internalisation of numerical cognition is achieved on the basis
of interaction with concrete materials. The resulting pictorial representation is
followed by the symbolic representation; the next step represents the
automatisation in the realm of symbolism.
The concrete use of finger material when calculating with the fingers slowly leads to
the ability to think in images.
Initially, quantities are represented pictorially and symbolically by labelling the fingers
with numbers and by the supplementary use of wooden sticks.
After sufficient practice and honing through repetition, based on an instruction using
exact models for imitation, the necessity of finger movement diminishes. The fingers
no longer need to be extended and withdrawn in their entirety; frequently one
observes a twitch. Thereafter, along the path from the concrete to the abstract,
movement will be abandoned entirely in favour of simple observation of the fingers.
The action will eventually be replaced by imagery; mental calculation is the next step.
The imagination provides support for the transition from physical dependence to
abstract imagery.
Particularly important is the simultaneous verbal accompaniment of finger
movements. In the process of stripping away, speech slowly replaces action.
Individuals with Down Syndrome assisted by verbalisation can learn to count and
to perform mathematical operations.
Internalisation of the visible, the acquisition of structure and arrangement
independently of visual control leads to abstract thinking. The acquired knowledge
may then be transferred to the mathematical demands of daily life.
13
14
Long-term memory
Activities and experiences shape the individual structure, the architecture of the
brain. Long-term memory creates the individual with all his many attributes.
In long-term memory knowledge is embedded for the duration and made accessible
through active biological processes.
15
The emotional centre of the brain, the so-called limbic system, plays a primary role
in the transferal of information and experiences from the working memory into longterm memory. The feelings that accompany impressions and data, and that are
passed along with them, decisively influence storage in long-term memory.
The limbic system is a unity made up of diverse brain structures.
The amygdala (because of its shape also referred to as almond seed) lies
within the limbic system, the most important part of the brain for the
processing of emotions. Without our awareness, information considered
valuable will be tagged by the amygdala and stored in full context.
The hippocampus (because of its shape also referred to as sea horse)
likewise a part of the limbic system. Absorbed sensory perceptions are
spatially and temporally organised, sorted, and linked to emotions. This
memory manager plays a key role in the recording of stimuli in long-term
memory. Through a close connection with the cerebrum, which is responsible
for long-term storage, it builds a bridge for the embedding, recall and
generalisation of learning experiences.
Hippocampus
Amygdala
The nucleus accumbens of the limbic system is the heart of the reward
centre. If the student experiences the feeling of success, this centre will be
activated, and his willingness, motivation and desire to learn more will
increase.
16
Briefly: With the assistance of the hippocampus, information that is coupled with
positive feelings and that stimulates curiosity and interest on the part of the student
will be permanently embedded.
Similarly, the deployment of multiple senses, effective practice and repetition, as
well as rest periods for the consolidation of information and processes positively
influence storage in long-term memory.
Effective learning depends on repetition. Psychological experiments testify that
immediately after learning, most of the information absorbed will be forgotten. The
frequency of repetition in the first few days should therefore be intense, and with
respect to individuals with Down Syndrome, should be performed once or twice daily
over a period of several weeks. Later on, the frequency of repetition may be
somewhat reduced. Important, however, even months later, is consistency and
perseverance. The development of kinetic models for counting and calculating with
the fingers, the refinement of which will be recognizable by increased speed and
assurance, requires consistent repetition and automatisation, in short: practice.
This perpetual activation may be compared to a wood, where frequent passage
eventually wears a path. In long-term memory this path represents a trail of
knowledge. If the path is abandoned for a longer period, it will again become
overgrown. If our storehouse of knowledge likewise goes unused, it will no longer be
accessible. Routine repetition, however, quickly restores it to our consciousness.
Not only concentrated learning, during which time nerve cells extend numerous new
branches, but also the rest period afterwards are crucial to durable memory. The
repetition of information and activities, e.g. finger movement when calculating, leads
by way of newly made connections to structural and functional alterations in the
neurological network.
This security back-up requires hours or even days and is referred to as consolidation.
It is primarily during the deep-sleep phase that the new connections will be
embedded in long-term memory.
Knowledge that can be accessed in long-term memory may be divided into two
groups:
To know that: Episodes, events and facts from ones own life (episodic
memory) and factual knowledge (semantic memory) are stored in
declarative memory.
17
18
Babies that are only a few months old can distinguish quantities according to
fundamental size within the categories of more & less, which has been
measured by the length of their eye contact. Five-month-old infants with 46
chromosomes already possess a basic understanding of addition and
subtraction (Wynn, 1990); at present we have no data for babies with Down
Syndrome.
These capabilities are primarily controlled in the upper central, or parietal, lobes of
the left and right brain halves. Our brain is programmed to calculate. According to
Dehaene, individuals displaying weaknesses for calculating are less favoured with an
innate number sense. Blakemore (2006, p. 98) reaches a similar conclusion: Many
children appear to suffer from an early deficiency in quantitative representation in
parietal lobe and therefore do not possess an intuitive understanding of quantity.
parietal lobe
19
Level 0
numbers
to 10
Level 1
numbers
to 10
Level 2
numbers
to 100
Level 3
20
The ability to count forwards and backwards lays the basic foundation for the
development of primary calculating skills (addition and subtraction).
Concentration for the course of study:
understanding of quantity
sorting, arranging
comparisons (e.g. quantity, size, geometrical forms)
invariability
numerical expressions in correct and unchanging order
the number zero- or naught
differentiation of individual objects: figure-field perception (acoustical and
visual)
1:1 relationships: object and finger image as representation of quantity
irrelevance of grouping
irrelevance of content (insignificance of what is counted)
understanding of cardinal numbers (how many?)
understanding of ordinal numbers (which among the many?)
actual number array
analogy of counting on the fingers from left to right with respect to the
development of the number array
21
3.2.5 Memory
Concentration for the course of study:
The storage and application of declarative and procedural knowledge are optimized
by frequent exercise and repetition. Both the working and long-term memories profit
from a close association between task and result, which is made particularly clear by
the multiplication tables.
Techniques for memory training, such as application of the loci method, again call
upon the use of ones own body as mnemonic aid or as a strategy for retrieval.
The limited storage capacity of the working memory observable in many individuals
with Down Syndrome requires short, intensive learning sessions of approximately 15
minutes each with varied content.
An example:
An individual first learning to calculate with his fingers trains his basic skills for ca. 10
minutes. After a 2-minute break there follows another 10-minute block with 1:1
relationships, point of departure being objects from his own life, e.g. things collected,
pictures of a favourite idol, toys etc.
The ensuing 3-minute break is followed by learning to count with the fingers from left
to right (by means of imitation), which lasts approximately 15 minutes. To close,
teacher and pupil together sing a song that repeats the numerical series 0 to 10.
22
23
4.1 History
It has been historically documented that even in Roman times one learned to count
and calculate with the fingers.
Outside present-day Europe this technique has also been specifically applied. Tribes
in Papua, New Guinea, use numerous parts of their bodies to represent number
positions, beginning with the right little finger, which represents 1, and proceeding to
the right little toe, which represents 33. In Ali, a language of central Africa, one
encounters the words moro and mbuona. Moro represents the number 5 and
etymologically means the hand, mbuono combines the words buono (for 2) and
precisely moro. Together they make two hands, and the expression accordingly
indicates the number 10. (Wehr et al., 2009, p. 260 f.)
Likewise, the original inhabitants of Paraguay recognized the strength of the five and
used the same word for both the hand and the 5. The number 6 translated meant
one on the other hand, 7 was indicated by two on the other hand etc. The number
10 was expressed simply by two hands.
The English word digit can be translated into German both as Finger (= finger)
and as Ziffer or Zahl (= cipher or number); it derives from the Latin digitus. In
German the word digital is commonly used.
Tarangesa is the word for 1 in the language of the Bugilai, New Guinea; it also
means the little finger of the left hand. The expanded counting construct orients
itself sequentially on the designation for the ring finger, the middle finger, the index
finger and the thumb of the left hand. This counting principle resembles the abovedescribed methodology of counting and calculating with the fingers proceeding from
left to right.
24
At the beginning of the 20th century the method of counting with the fingers was
further developed by Wlecke and Wulz, among others. Wulz called the fingers the
classic aid in teaching arithmetic in special-education schools. (quoting Eckstein
2010, p. 62), and these two champions of calculating with the fingers likewise built up
the number series proceeding from left to right.
Calculating with the fingers is paid particular attention today in the cybernetic
arithmetical method developed by Hariolf Dreher.
In many cultures of the world, children 3 to 4 years old spontaneously discover that
they can use their fingers in their initial efforts to count, in the sense of 1:1
relationships with objects, and to alter quantity and categorize more-less.
(Butterworth, 1999)
The SNARC effect is not observable among children who demonstrate difficulties in
processing visual-spatial relationships.
In such cases, learning to count with the fingers from left to right could represent an
effective challenge.
The influence of well-known finger-counting activities on the development of body
language, spatial orientation and abstraction is demonstrated by Di Luca (see
Stemmer et al., 2008, p. 221).
26
parietal lobe
27
For exact mathematical calculations the left frontal lobe (behind the
forehead) is additionally called into play; it is also activated for verbal
tasks. Exact reckoning and speaking are closely linked, a fact that has
been underscored by language-impairment studies (Spelke & Tsivkin,
2001). The motions of calculating with the fingers are simultaneously
accompanied verbally.
frontal lobe
parietal lobe
Spitzer (2003) refers to studies by Dehaene (1999) which demonstrate that language
areas of the brain control exact reckoning, whereas spatial areas, together with those
responsible for finger activity, control approximations.
Thus the brain appears to possess multiple systems that are responsible for dealing
with the various aspects of number and quantity, which normally work together to
integrate all of the data so that the information as a whole makes sense. (Blakemore
et al., 2006, p. 82.)
The ability to calculate demands the integration of this network of visual-spatial,
verbal and other specific numerical representations.
The parietal network for calculating is formed later and in the process is presumably
supported by finger movements.
28
According to Spitzer (2005, p. 140), far reaching consequences may be drawn from
this for the judicious instruction of mathematics, which should integrate both types of
mathematical approaches.
With respect to calculating with fingers we have now come full circle!
Coordination of concrete mathematical scenarios with finger calculations and their
verbal textualization links the two representational forms for numbers in our brain.
Understanding of place value is made easier through visual differentiation: the ones
position is represented by the fingers, the tens by small sticks (later on by the
knuckle bones), the hundreds by discs (later on by imaginary lines on the back of the
hand).
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 must be sufficient for the infinite possibilities of creating
numbers. The system of place value therefore assigns numbers differing values.
These are visually and tactilely perceived and understood through representation of
the ones with the fingers, the tens with small sticks or the knuckle bones, the
hundreds with discs or lines on the back of the hand.
The ten-one inversion in the German language can also be simplified through the
combination of finger image and tens-stick with the advice finger first.
For textualization one relies on the motto: write down what you see. The tens-stick
lies to the left, the finger as representation of the ones is to the right of it.
29
The close connection between finger activity and perception of quantity is made clear
by a much noted study of Rusconi et al. (2005).
30
From this study it may be concluded that counting with the fingers not
only is important at an early age, but that it also influences the structure
of the processing of numbers in adult years, furthermore that abstract
mental images are based for the most part on our physical experiences.
Data from a study of 2005 (Rusconi et al.) likewise testify to a
connection between the development of numerical cognition and
counting with the fingers, namely, among adults who long since ceased
to use their fingers to solve simple problems of arithmetic.
Even among adults who solved the simplest, single-digit additions, one
could still document brain activity in motor regions responsible for finger
movements (Ventkatraman et al., 2005).
Individuals who live with the so-called Gerstmann Syndrome display
diverse deficiencies in various regions of the brain, particularly in the
gyrus angularis.
Four primary symptoms are manifest: graphomotoric impairment, leftright disorientation, mathematical deficiencies, and finger agnosia. The
latter refers to the inability to distinguish which finger is touched or
moved once all visual stimuli have been eliminated.
In childhood years the Gerstmann Syndrome is referred to as DGS, for
Developmental Gerstmann Syndrome (Kinsbourne, 1968).
While the ability of 5-year-olds to distinguish among their individual
fingers offers a prognosis for their future mathematical development
(Fayol et al., 1998; Noel, 2005), training of this ability will increase their
calculating skills (Gracia-Bafulluy and Noel, 2008).
These studies demonstrate the importance of a mature hand
language, that can be decisively and positively influenced by
calculating with the fingers.
In this connection Penner-Wilger and Anderson (2008) hypothesize
interconnected neuronal circuits as a consequence of redeployment,
freely paraphrased as supplementary duty.
These circuits, which are designed to recognize the fingers, additionally
play a role in certain mathematical capacities, but without suffering a
loss of function and all the while retaining their original purpose.
31
32
33
4.12 Rebuilding
Because of the narrow connection between finger language and the mental
representation of numbers, simple counting and calculating with the 10 fingers could
serve as basis for the rebuilding of mathematical skills lost as a result of
neurological disturbances.
34
5. Conclusio
If mathematics is informed by dead things alone, then life is frolicking elsewhere.
(Zimpel, 2008, p. 12)
Learning is a creative process with its own dynamic. Every individual with Down
Syndrome who enters a learning situation brings along with him his entire personal
experience and individual foreknowledge. By establishing a link between pre-existing
knowledge and experience, it is possible to build a bridge to the unknown and often
dreaded, rejected quantity Mathematics.
Recognition of the already familiar instils a security and self-confidence to venture
into the realm of the unknown. Christel Manske leads the Hamburg Institute for the
systematic development of functional brain systems. Using the pseudonym Iris Mann
(1999, p. 163), she writes: We calculate constantly, just as we constantly speak.
However, mathematical instruction for the most part means working with symbols
that have no connection whatsoever to life as we experience it. (ibid.)
Teachers who enable individuals with the most diverse constellation of chromosomes
to experience an aha! revelation because point of departure for their instruction of
calculating skills is the life of the individual himself are like pilots who, before taking
off, assure that all passengers are on board. In this connection in particular, Sousa
(2008) stresses the importance of considering the student profile. As behavioural
scientist, he reports on the data of studies that document that the learning style of the
teacher substantially determines his didactical approach. For those teachers who are
acoustically oriented, it is crucial when working with individuals with Down Syndrome
to recognize their preference for the visual and tactile-kinaesthetic instructional
models.
Their hands are the gate to the world of mathematics, they help to unveil its secrets
and to wield control over its demands.
The development of an everyday mathematic has enormous consequences for the
social and economic life of the individual with Down Syndrome. And there are
opportunities enough at every age.
Blakemore (2008, p. 176 f.) writes:
Alterations in the brain are generally dependent upon the amount it is used: Use it or
lose it. What is not used will be lost. Even the adult brain shows enormous capacity
for change.
Learning occurs at every age, and it is never too late to learn.
35
References
Ayres, A.J. (2002). Bausteine der kindlichen Entwicklung. Strungen erkennen und verstehen.
Ganzheitliche Frhfrderung und Therapie. Praktische Hilfe fr Eltern. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer
Blakemore, S. (2006). Wie wir lernen. Was die Hirnforschung darber wei. Mnchen: DVA.
Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
Dehaene, S. (1999). The number sense. How the mind creates mathematics. New York: University
Press.
Domahs, F., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Willmes, K. & Nuerk, H.-C. (2010). Embodied numerosity: Implicit
hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition, 116,
251-266.
Dornheim, D. (2008). Prdiktion von Rechenleistung und Rechenschwche: Der Beitrag von ZahlenVorwissen und allgemein-kognitiven Fhigkeiten. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
Eckstein, B. (2010). Frderung numerischer Kompetenzen durch Fingerrechnen- berlegungen zum
Anfangsunterricht mit rechenschwachen Kindern. Zeitschrift fr Heilpdagogik, 2, 59-68.
Fayol, M., Barrouillet, P. & Marinthe, C. (1998). Predicting arithmetical
achievement from neuropsychological performance: A
longitudinal study. Cognition, 68: B63B70.
Feuerstein, R. (1985). Instrumental enrichment. An intervention program for cognitive modifiability.
Glenview: Scott Foresman.
Fischer, M. (2007). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations
http://ureca.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/uploads/File/Fischer08_Cortex_FingerCountin.pdf (2010-08-12).
Garner, B. K. (2009). Ich habs! Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
Gracia-Bafalluy, M. & Noel, MP. (2008). Does finger training increase
numerical performance? Cortex, 44: 368375.
Kennedy, J. M. (1997). Wie Blinde zeichnen. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 3, 84-89.
Kinsbourne, M. (1968). Developmental Gerstmann syndrome. Pediatric Clinics of
North America, 15, 771-778.
Landerl K. & Kaufmann, L. (2008). Dyskalkulie. Mnchen: Ernst Reinhardt.
Mann, I. (1990). Lernen knnen ja alle Leute. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
Noel M. (2005). Finger gnosia: A predictor of numerical abilities in
children? Child Neuropsychology, 11: 413430.
Penner-Wilger, M. & Anderson, M. L. (2008). An alternative view of the relation between finger gnosis
and math ability: Redeployment of finger representations for the representation of number . In V.
Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Rusconi, E., Walsh, V. & Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with numbers: rTMS over left angular gyrus
disrupts finger gnosis and number processing. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1609-1624.
Sousa, D. (2008). How the brain learns Mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
36
Spelke, E. & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Language and number: a bilingual training study.
Cognition, 78(1), 45-88.
Spitzer, M. (2002). Lernen, Gehirnforschung und die Schule des Lebens. Heidelberg: Berlin.
Spitzer, M. (2005). Reine Nervensache. Geschichten vom Gehirn. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.
Steinweg, A. (2009). Rechnest du noch mit den Fingern? Aber sicher! Der mathematische und
naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht. Primar, 1, 124-128.
Stemmer, B. & Whitacker, H. (2008). Handbook of the neuroscience of language. London: Academic
Press.
Venkatraman, V., Ansari, D. & Chee, M. (2005). Neural correlates of symbolic and non-symbolic
arithmetic. Neuropsychologia, 43, 744-753.
Wehr, M. & Weinmann, M. (2009). Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Wynn, K. (1999). Childrens understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155-193.
Zimpel, A. F. (2008). Der zhlende Mensch. Was Emotionen mit Mathematik zu tun haben. Gttingen:
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
37