Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Menu
Skip to content
Home
About
field study 4 by Jay Ar Aspero
1
Learning Assessment Strategies
A Portfolio Presented To: Teacher Education Department Northern Negros State College of
Science
And Technology Old Sagay, Sagay
City Negros Occidental
Submitted By: Ana Lou Muralla, Ether Ofilan, Preslene Palmos,Schwein Mae
Tan and Jay Ar Aspero
BSED III-A
Acknowledgement
We just want to express our heartfelt gratitude to those who were so generous with
their time and expertise:
To our Almighty God for the knowledge, strength and wisdom. His guidance leads us
to select the most desirable way to success.
To our parents who provided us their financial support, love, moral values and
advices.
To Mrs. Mary Grace Ofqueria as our mentor for our Field Study 5. We really
appreciate your utmost effort in facilitating and checking our errors. Thank you for molding
us to be competent and knowledgeable Learning Assessment Strategies. We are so grateful
to have you as our mentor and we feel so blessed.
To Mrs. Maria Gargar for your cooperation and to your students who also gave their
cooperation. We wish we could express our appreciation to them for their warm hospitality.
Our classmates and friends who shared their brilliant ideasThe expertise in this portfolio belongs to those listed above. Any errors are ours.
My Assessment List
Episode 1
Target
Description
Assessment Tools
1.
1.
Paper
and Pencil Test
(Completion type)
Preslene S. Palmos
1.
2.
Paper
and Pencil Test
(Completion Type)
The 2,
results
the test
School Address: National Highway,
Pob.
SagayofCity,
Negros
will
be
used
as
a
basis
or
Occidental
standard for revision of
instruction.
Date of Visit: January 17, 2013
1.
4.
Problem
Solving
Tools
It was used as an
assessment in order to have
an idea what students know
Assessment Tools
Classification Sheets
Conventional
Types
1.
1.
Paper
and Pencil
Test
(Completion type)
Preslene Palmos
1.
2.
Paper
and Pencil
Test
(Completion type)
Ether Ofilan
Authentic or
Alternative Types
It is a form of traditional
assessment that measures
students ability in selecting and
analyzing questions. It uses
material that includes paper and
pencil where there is a
corresponding choice with only
one corrects answer. It is an
effective tool because it will help
students how to analyze carefully
the question by giving them
corresponding choices and they
will select the best answer. With
these assessments, students will
measure their mental abilities or
how they understand and retain
their previous lesson.
1.
1.
Process
-Orinted
Performance
Assessment
(Problem
Solving)
1.
2.
Proble
m Solving
3. Problem
Solving
In this form of
assessments the students think
critically what should be the
answer to a specific problem.
With this students find solutions
that will give way to motivate
himself to finish the task, it can
also develop his/her personality
to explore that will help him
nourish the skills in problem
solving.
Jay Ar Aspero
Group Anlysis
Was there a variety of assessment methods used by the teacher? How relevant
was/were the assessment method/s used?
Group Reflection
Write your group reflection of thoughts and feelings about the importance in the
use of appropriate assessment methods in the classroom, including what students
and teachers can gain from appropriate assessment tools.
will provide information to be used as feedback to modify the teaching and learning
activities in which they are engaged.
We believe when these assessment methods will be utilized effectively,
future teachers like us will have a basis or standards for the students ability that will enable
us to act more appropriately and effectively promote learning.
Episode 2
My Atm Card
(Available Test & Measures)
Initial Notes
Name of the School Observed: Sagay National High School
School Address: National Highway, Pob 2, Sagay City
Date of Visit: January 17, 2013
Year Level: Fourth Year
Subject Area: Science
Subject Matter: Centrifugal
Effect
Other Notes:
Based on my observation I learned that, when
making learning objective I should always put in mind that
the assessment should be linked in the learning objectives.
In that way, I can make judgment that my student
understand the lesson presented. In designing learning
objective, preciseness is important because it will help the
student perform the task effectively.
Teachers
Learningand
Objective:
Desired
Condition
Criterion Level of the Learning
Objectives:
Determine the interrelationship among
current, voltageClassroom
and its resistance.
activities occur every day and
these activities cannot be done without the formulation of
objectives, its the very first thing a teacher must do, this
learning objectives will be their basis in their one day
activity. This learning objectives must be with accordance to
the subject matter, must be consistent on the certain topic,
must apply the necessary application a student should gain,
Desired Condition and Criterion Level of the Learning
and it must be observable to the learners.
Objectives:
The purpose of learning objectives is to assist
Other
Notes:
teachers
in identifying the focus of instruction and
assessment. Learning objectives are important in designing
a task or activities
that
students must
oughtbe
to observed
learn or perform
These
conditions
in making
connected
to
real-life
situation.
In
that
way,
cana
learning objective. Making learning objectiveteacher
is not just
measure
students
performance
by
constructing
an
objective
thing or a written report; it is a procedure that is necessary
through
clear
and established
behavioral
terms
which
could
to develop
proper
learning process.
Making
proper
learning
be
measurable.
objective come up high quality assessment, where in you
can immediately find the appropriate and consistent
assessment tool to reflect your learning objectives. Through
the use of learning objectives you can derive such criterias
and standards to be reach by the students and also you as a
teacher on your current day activity.
Other Notes:
circuit.
Other Notes:
When formulating a learning a learning objective as
teachers we must bear in mind that the learning objectives
must be congruent to the skills and content so that it could
be observed through the behavior of the learning if he/she is
learning or not. With this we can achieve a high quality
assessment.
Other Notes:
The learning objectives must involve knowledge,
reasoning, skills, products and affects that are needed to be
stated in behavioral terms which denote something that can
be observed through the behavior of the students. As much
as possible the learning objectives must be specific,
measurable, attainable, and relevant and time bounded in
order to achieve a high quality assessment that is precise,
accurate and dependable.
Group Analysis
Do you think the teachers learning objective was appropriately
assessed by your test items? Why? / Why not?
The teachers learning objectives were appropriately assessed by our test
items because there was a congruency between the learning objectives and assessment
tool that we used. We follow the guidelines and tips in constructing test items in order to
have a good result and this good result indicates that the learning objectives were achieved.
In constructing test items we follow the principles of high quality assessment in order for our
test items to have a validity, reliability, fairness, practicality and efficiency.
Why did you have to study the teachers learning objectives prior to
developing an assessment tool?
Group Refelction
Assessment is a way to evaluate the understanding and learning of
students. The assessment to be used must be fair, appropriate, valid and reliable
in order to have a high quality assessment.
The coverage of the test must be already taught so as to have fairness in
assessment. It makes student capable of passing the test because everything on the test
are already learned and the checking of the test must have a criteria especially if it is an
authentic test to give the students ideas on how to improve the learning on the next time
around and there is reflection and metacognition because of the criteria.
The appropriateness of assessment tool with regards to the learning objectives will
bring relevance and good learning outcomes. The validity of assessment tool talks about the
purpose of the test. To improve the learning outcome is always the purpose of the
assessments. The content of the test determines whether the number of items is adequate
regarding the result of the test to give basis for the decision-making. The adequacy of the
items to be included in the test can be reviewed based on the learning targets that are
intended to be included in the test. There must be a table of specification so that we are
guided in making the number of items adequate.
A reliable test would show similar performance at different times and different
conditions. Just like for example: the same set of the test questions are given to two
different sections at different time and if the result of the test are almost the same then
thats the time that we can say test is consistent or reliable.
We fully understand that we must be skillful in designing a test and interpreting
results of objective test so as to achieve a high quality assessment
Episode 3
Log Me
Names of FS Students: Ana Lou Muralla, Ether Ofilan, Preslene Palmos,
Schwein Mae Tan and Jay Ar Aspero
Course, Year & Section: BSEd III-A
Resource Teacher: Mrs. Maria Gargar
School: Sagay National High School
Target
At the end of this activity, we well informed on the principles of authentic
assessment and its usefulness in the classrooms.
Tools
Searched Article By: Analou Muralla
Date Retrieve: February 18, 2013
The Ethical & Moral Dilemmas of Classroom Assessments
Classroom assessments assess student skill and direct further instruction.
The main purposes of classroom assessments are to assess the degree to which students
have grasped material and to provide feedback to teachers to guide further instruction.
Classroom assessments involve several moral and ethical dilemmas concerning assessment
validity, classroom equity and the degree to which high-stakes assessments should impact a
students education opportunities and progress. As more and more states develop
mandated standardized assessments, teachers are under more pressure to evaluate the
ethical dilemmas in classroom assessments.
History
Though moral and ethical dilemmas in classroom assessments have been present
since the foundations of public schools, public concern of ethical conflicts in assessment
wasnt widespread until the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. Discussions of education
equity largely focused on equal access to educational resources, but concerns about
cultural biases within assessment were also including in the dialogue of desegregated
education. In 1974, the Buckley Amendment was passed, which prohibited the disclosure
of a students academic records to outside institutions; some scholars felt that limiting
access to assessments of student achievement decreased the validity of assessments
and reduced academic competitiveness. The more recent passage of the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 reignited the debate between the value of summative and formative
assessments as well as called into question the ethical conflicts associated with highstakes standardized testing.
Significance
Assessments are a valuable tool in education and learning. Assessments serve two
significant functions. The primary significance of classroom assessments is to assess a
students level of achievement in regard to a particular subject or topic. The second
function of classroom assessments is to provide instructors with feedback about the
effectiveness of their teaching. Because the significance of assessments is so high,
ethical dilemmas concerning assessment can have a serious impact on the quality of
education a student receives. If an assessment is deemed invalid or unreliable, then it
cannot be used to determine student success or develop further instruction. Discussing
the ethical conflicts of classroom assessments ensures that assessments continue to
serve as a valid means of providing performance feedback to students and teachers alike.
There are several types of ethical dilemmas associated with classroom assessments.
The most frequent dilemma concerns the role and value of high-stakes tests and
assessments. The No Child Left Behind Act mandates that standardized high-stakes
exams be given to students at regular intervals; the tests are used to evaluate the overall
performance of a school system. Opponents believe that using a single measuring
instrument to evaluate schools is unethical, especially because the results of such tests
are used to determine future funding to school districts. Teachers must balance preparing
students for the exam while including additional forms of formative assessments in
classrooms.
Another concern of classroom assessments is the need to provide quantitative data for
statistical purposes despite the fact that many assessments are qualitative in nature.
Modern education research largely endorses qualitative or holistic assessments that provide
clear, written feedback to students about performance; school districts and local
governments, however, require schools to report quantified data that does not always paint
a clear picture of student achievement.
A major ethical dilemma of classroom assessments is the distinction between standardsbased assessments and growth-based assessments. Most districts require standards-based
assessments in which all students are assessed on their ability to achieve specific learning
benchmarks. However, teachers often believe that students should instead be assessed
based on their growth from the beginning of a lesson to the end, regardless of whether the
student achieved the specific benchmark or not. Because all students begin at different
levels of ability, some scholars believe it is not equitable to require all students to achieve
the same level of skill at the end of the year.
Effects
Ethical conflicts about assessments can have a serious impact on the quality of
education in a school district. Unanswered ethical conflicts about cultural biases or
language inequities result in lower grades for non-native English speakers or immigrants.
Teachers report feeling pressure to teach to a high-stakes test rather than teaching topics
that may be relevant to specific student groups; the result is a manufactured education
experience for students and a limited scope of potential teaching material for teachers.
Discussion about ethical dilemmas has, however, lead to more scrutiny of test materials
in the search for an equitable assessment that holds districts accountable while allowing
all students equal access to opportunities for demonstrating knowledge.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
History
Significance
A.
The Primary Significance
B.
The secondary Significance
Types of major Dilemmas
A.
Standard Based Assessments
B.
Growth Based Assessments
Effects
Solutions
Prepared by:
Analou Muralla
Prepared by:
Analou Muralla
When considering the validity of a performance test, it is important to first consider how the
test or instrument behaves given the content covered. Questions should be asked such as:
*Can the measure predict future performances?
*Does the assessment adequately cover the content domain?
It is also important to review the intended effects of using the assessment instrument.
Questions about the use of a test typically focus on the tests ability to reliably differentiate
individuals into groups and guide the methods teachers use to teach the subject matter
covered by the test. A word of caution: Unintended uses of assessments can have precarious
effects. To prevent the misuse of assessments, the following questions should be considered:
*Does use of the instrument result in discriminatory practices against various groups of
individuals?
*Is it used to evaluate others (e.g., parents or teachers) who are not directly assessed the
test?
PROVIDING EVIDENCE FOR THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The technical qualities and scoring procedures of performance assessments must meet high
standards for reliability and validity. To ensure that sufficient evidence exists for a measure,
the following four issues should be addressed:
1. Assessment as a Curriculum Event. Externally mandated assessments that bear little, if
any, resemblance to subject area domain and pedagogy cannot provide a valid or reliable
indication of what a student knows and is able to do. The assessment should reflect what is
taught and how it is taught. Making an assessment a curriculum event means
reconceptualizing it as a series of theoretically and practically coherent learning activities
that are structured in such a way that they lead to a single predetermined end. When
planning for assessment as a curriculum event, the following factors should be considered:
2. Task Content Alignment with Curriculum. Content alignment between what is tested and
what is taught is essential. What is taught should be linked to valued outcomes for students
in the district.
3. Scoring and Subsequent Communications with Consumers. In large scale assessment
systems, the scoring and interpretation of performance assessment instruments is akin to a
criterion-referenced approach to testing. A students performance is evaluated by a trained
rater who compares the students responses to multitrait descriptions of performances and
then gives the student a single number corresponding to the description that best
characterizes the performance. Students are compared directly to scoring criteria and only
indirectly to each other. In the classroom, every student needs feedback when the purpose
of performance assessment is diagnosis and monitoring of student progress. Students can
be shown how to assess their own performances when:
2.
3.
iii.
iv.
Prepared by:
Ether Ofilan
Prepared by:
Ether Ofilan
The classroom assessment may have an impact on the amount of funding the school
receives and also reflect on teachers unfairly. Teachers who are teaching with limited
resources in overcrowded classrooms are at a significant disadvantage. The test may not
address the real educational needs of a particular classroom.
Preparation
Some schools dedicate a disproportionate amount of time to preparing for the test in order
to have students perform well. The educators may want to make their school look good so
they teach the test and not the material. Students learn how to successfully pass the test
but may not come away with any significant understanding.
My freshman-year introductory psychology course was designed like most courses one finds
not just at the college level, but from middle school onward. The main means of teaching
was lecture, and the main assessment of performance was a set of tests that measured our
recall and basic understanding of the facts taught in the course. I got a C. My professor
commented to me, There is a famous Sternberg in psychology, and it looks like there wont
be another one. I got discouraged, left psychology, and came back only when I was failing
my introductory course for math majors and decided a C was better than an F.
Thirty-five years later, I became president of the American Psychological Association, which,
with a membership of 155,000, is the largest professional organization of psychologists in
the world. In some ways, it is the best position one can get in the field of psychology. I
cracked to my predecessor that it was ironic that I, who had gotten a C in my introductory
course, was now president of the association. He looked me straight in the eye and admitted
that he, too, had gotten a C.
This vignette points out in microcosm what may be wrong with the assessments to which
we, as a society, have committed ourselves. As a teacher or administrator, how many times
have you had to take a multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank test except perhaps, when you
needed to show that you were supposedly qualified for your job? When I look at the skills
and concepts I have needed to succeed in my own field, I find a number that are crucial:
creativity, common sense, wisdom, ethics, dedication, honesty, teamwork, hard work,
knowing how to win and how to lose, a sense of fair play, and lifelong learning. But
memorizing books is certainly not one of them.
One can argue, with justification, that one cannot think without content to think with and
about. This is indisputable. But when we teach only for facts, rather than for how to go
beyond facts, we teach students how to get out of date. For example, the facts that I learned
in my introductory psychology course matter little today. An introductory text today contains
almost entirely different facts. I know: I am the author of one of those textbooks (Sternberg,
2004). Other fields, such as the hard sciences, political science, economics, and so forth,
change at least as rapidly. Even the humanities change: A set of classic works remains, but
the interpretationsand even what constitutes such interpretationschange.
So what should we assess? We should assess what students need to become active and
engaged citizens of the world in which they will livein a sense, what it takes to be expert
citizens. Oddly enough, a lot of models can prepare students for the roles they will play in
their world. Traditional schooling just does not happen to be one of them. We should also
assess in ways that can help students develop the skills they need for success in school and
life.
Consider students on an athletic team. They learn declarative knowledge about the sport.
But learning the rules of the game will no more help them in playing the game than
memorizing a book of rules on driving will help someone drive. The students also need to
learn how to play the sport.
But the most important skills they learn have nothing to do with one sort or another. These
skills are very much like those I mentioned previously: dedication, honesty, teamwork,
common sense, and the wisdom to distinguish right from wrong. Athletics is not the only
model for such learning. Consider the members of an orchestra or of a dance ensemble.
They, too, must learn to work together and must develop similar skills.
How might assessments better reflect the kinds of skills that matternot just in school, but
also in life beyond school? This is a question that we in the Center for the Psychology of
Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, formerly at Yale and now at Tufts University, have
posed for ourselves. It is a challenge that we have, to some extent, taken as our life work.
1.
2.
3.
Socioeconomic Factors
A.
Cultural Bias
B.
Impact
C.
Preparation
Skills and Concept
A.
Creativity
B.
Common Sense
C.
Wisdom
D.
Ethics
E.
Teamwork
F.
Hardwork
G.
Memorizing
Means of Education
A.
B.
Teaching
Assessment
Prepared by:
Preslene S. Palmos
Prepared by:
Preslene S. Palmos
Decide Purpose
Formative-need to cover basic principles.
Summative need to cover a wide range of concepts and be designed to discriminate
among abilities.
1. List content areas and how many questions you need.
Should be based on objectives and what was taught.
Include information on levels of learning if you want to examine various levels of
understanding.
1. Create items
Decide format/type of items.
Subjective formats typically requires less time to construct, more to evaluate.
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Decide Purpose
A.
Formative
i.
Basic Principles
B.
Summative
i.
Wide Range of Concepts
List Content Areas and How Many Questions you Need
A.
Based on the Objectives and What Has Taught
B.
Include information on Levels of Learning
Create Items
A.
Decide Format/ Type of Items
B.
Subjective Formats
i.
Essay, Short Answer, Fill in
a.
Objective Formats
b.
Multiple Choices, True/ False,
Matching
Create Key Answers
Prepared by:
Prepared by:
Author Marilyn Burns (2005) advocates questioning as a formative assessment that involves
students. Whether verbal or written, thoughtful questions can be used to probe student
responses and elicit student reasoning. Flawed reasoning, she points out, can be found in
both correct and incorrect student answers. This questioning strategy provides teachers with
insights into student thinking that can guide their refinement of future lessons. It also helps
students reflect on their own thought processes, a practice called metacognition.
Provide High-Level Instructional Feedback
Although teacher feedback can be observed in almost every classroom, its use does not
always serve as an effective classroom assessment tool. There are clearly recorded
examples in which teachers have, quite unconsciously, responded in ways that would
inhibit the future learning of a pupil. What the examples have in common is that the teacher
is looking for a particular response and lacks the flexibility or the confidence to deal with the
unexpected. So the teacher tries to direct the pupil toward giving the expected answer
(Black & Wiliam, 1998, p. 143).
In contrast, high-quality instructional feedback is timely, useful, and appropriate. Timely
feedbackgiven as soon as possible after the assessment occurscan influence the next
steps in the learning process. Useful feedback, says author Thomas Guskey (2005), is both
diagnostic and prescriptive. It reinforces precisely what students were expected to learn,
identifies what was learned well, and describes what needs to be learned better (p. 6).
Whether verbal or written, instructional feedback should go beyond indicating the degree of
right and wrong to include advice on how the learner can improve next time.
Compile and Analyze Assessment Results
Data that result from a regularly administered variety of formative assessments can provide
teachers with reams of information about their instruction, what worked, what did not, and
what to do next. Neither the formative assessment nor the data need to be elaborate.
Teachers can compile student responses to find out which students are missing achievement
targets and how. Often patterns or trends will emerge when teachers ask and answer
questions, such as Are all of my students making the same kind of error?; Do their
mistakes show that they dont have the background knowledge they need to understand this
Differentiate Corrective Instruction
Perhaps the most challenging aspect of using formative assessments is knowing what to do
with the results. Results that indicate a student has not learned an important concept or skill
call for corrective instruction and additional opportunities for the student to demonstrate
learning.
Reference:http://www.education.com/reference/article/Ref_Using_Classroom/
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prepared by:
Jay Ar Aspero
Prepared by:
Jay Ar Aspero
How did you feel about the teachers experience in the use of authentic assessment?
We are so glad and thankful that we were able to observe a teacher that uses authentic assessme
that the teachers role was to assist or facilitate the students during the activity. They teacher gives feed
students with regards to the activity that they are performing. In a process based assessment specifically
solving, we learned that we must consider the utmost effort of students in solving the problem though th
not correct because it is the process of the solution that we are ought to assess.
What do you think have been the gains enjoyed by the teacher and his/ her students from usi
assessment?
The teacher gains convenience because her role was to assist the students in order for them to b
deviate on the procedure of the activity.
The students gain enjoyment during activities because they actively interact to each other. There
and cooperative learning that happens, because each of them are sharing their ideas though some ideas
but still they were able to perform the activity.
Learning Objectives:
Subject Matter: Centrifugal Force
Apply Ohms Law in Parallel Circuit
Learning Objective: Present a Sampled Parallel Circuit
Name of School Observed: Sagay National High School
Subject Matter: Series Circuit
Demonstrate how forces can work against gravity
School
Address:
Pob. 2, National
Highway, Sagay
City
General
Product-Oriented
Performance
Task:
Subject
Matter:
Ohms
Law
Name
of School
National
High School
Explain
that Observed:
gravity is aSagay
force that
pull things
towards the center of the Earth
Learning Objectives:
Grade/ Year Level:
Fourth
Year
The students will present an assembled parallel circuit that will serve as their output.
School
Address:
Pob. 2, National
Sagayloop-the-loop
City
Apply
the centrifugal
force byHighway,
making small
roller coaster
Learning
Applying
Objectives:
Ohms Law in Series Circuit.
Observation
Section:
Notes
Criteria
Excellent
Very-School
Satisfactory
Fair
Name of Gold
School
Observed:
Sagay National High
Poor
satisfactory
Grade/
Level: Fourth Year
Target Year
Skills:
Present a sampled
Draw series
seriesand
circuit.
parallel combination with attached four resistors in an entire branch of circuit.
Name
Subject
Area:
School
Physics
Observed:
Sagay
National Sagay
High
Schoo
General
Product-Oriented
Performance
Task:
100%
95%
80%
90%
75% 85%
70%80%
Schoolof
Address:
Pob.100%
2, National
Highway,
City
Subject
Area:
Physics
90%
Observe safety precautions to avoid accidents specifically short circuits
School
Subject
Demonstration
Address:
Matter:
Pob.
Centrifugal
of 2,
the
National
experiment
ForceHighway,
and making
Sagay City
a final output
Grade/
Year
Level:
Fourth
Year
General
Product-Oriented
Performance Task:
Subject
Matter:
Centripetal
Effect
Has
the 100%
Has 90% of
Has 85% of
Has 80% of
the outcome
bulbs
will glow or Has
not 95% of
1.Infer
Content
of
the if there
Neatness
&
The
drawing
of theisneeded The drawing
the needed
The
the
drawing
needed
is
The
the drawing
needed is
the
No needed
neatness
portfolio
Date
of
Visit:
January
18,
2013
Subject
Area: Physics
The clear,
students
willand
assemble
draw
a parallel
series
and
circuit
series
that
combination
will
serve
as
ontheir
withoutput.
attached
four
resistors incontent.
an entire
content.
content.
content.
content.
orderliness
clean
is
not
clean,
clean
but
is
clean
but
is
and
What
are
the best features
of my
performance assessment design?
Target
Skills:
Make
based
onwill
the
taskproduct-oriented
that
they
are
performing
branch
of hypothesis
circuit, this
activity
serve
as their
output.
well
arrange
and
but
itproduct/
is
clear
unclear and not
unclear and not
orderliness a
What
are
the
best
features
of my process-oriented
performance
assessment
design?
Grade/
Year
Level:
Fourth
Year
100%understand
and
wellarrange
arrange
all.
Subject Matter: Parallel Circuit
able
arrange
and
accordingly.
accordingly.
Not
Recognize
It
contains
and
best
apply
output
the
of
knowledge
the
students
of
centrifugal
force
in
a
real
context
Analyze
the given procedures and guidelines on how to assemble the parallel circuit
Target
Skills:
Objectives are 90%Objectives
Objectives are
Some
Most
1. Objectives
of
so
The
best
features
my process-oriented performance assessment design is
that it shows up the actual
Subject
Matter:
Ohms
Law of
Target
Skills:
smart and
are smart
smart but
Objectives are
objectives are
the
portfolio
understanda
understandable
performance
of
the students
wherein
me
as making
a teacher/
facilitator
can observe
theirtopic
doings
for me to
determine how
Build
and
solidifies
own
knowledge
through
experience
80%
new
understanding,
knowledge
by
an
output
regarding
with
the
centrifugal
force
cover
the
but
cover
cover
only
not
smart
and
not smart and
ble the
knowledge
that because
they
hadassembling
in series
order
to
assemble
theofparallel
circuitdesign?
What
arethe
the
best
features
of
my
process-oriented
performance
assessment
theyApply
Observe
come
upsafety
an
output,
precautions
and
when
itlearned
shows
actual
circuit
performance
especially
short
the students
circuit.
I can also observe their
understandable
whole course.
only a
less than 80%
do not cover
cover only a
behavior
towards of
theinterpersonal
task, if they skills.
perform it well in accordance to the procedure or not.
Development
minimum
of the course.
the whole
minimum of
What
Develop
Creates
arethe
the
meaningful
communication
bestfeatures
features
learning
skills
of my
through
processoriented
explaining
thetoeffect
performance
ofassessment
this
force
assessment
design?
Apply
knowledge
that
they
had
learned
in
order
assemble
the
parallel
circuit
The
best
in
my
process-oriented
performance
design
are
the
following:
of
80%
of
course.
the course.
Analyze the given procedures and guidelines on how to assemble the parallel circuit.
course. use of my process-oriented performance
What
Improving
specificthe
conditions
skill in drawing
are necessary
concepts. for the
successful
assessment
Shows
Thecorrectness
best
design?
features
of the
of my
students
process-oriented
answer
performance are that efficiency of student behavior on how they
1.Apply
1. theThe
instructions
clear
and easy
to understand
knowledge
that are
they
learned
in order
to assemble
the series
circuit.
come
up
the
output
effectively.
Finding
a
task
that
would
be interesting
and
enjoyable for the student where they
Learning
Activities
(Specific
Tasks):
Presentation
It enough
presents
the
It presents
It task
presents the
It presents the
No output at
Learning
Activities
(Specific
tasks):
2.
2.
There
is
time
for
the
students
to
finish
the
Analyzing
procedures,
rules
and
guidelines.
activity involved.
of
the
the knowledge
output
drawing
but
but thing
is
all entries
Entries
are
Entries
areand
Entries
are
of
Some
entries
Few
Tothe
have
a output
successful
ofuse
mental
of previous
process-oriented
thinking
that leads
performance
to the
students
design,
creature
first
learning
foremost
to consider
is that
3.
3.
Students
will recall
their
apply
it
on
the
taskandoutput
1.Support
Quality
ofdevelopment
Infer
the
outcomes
whether
the
bulb willand
glow
or
not.
whole
necessary
some
lacking
50%
of
not
able
to
it must
be
based
on
the
learning
best
quality,
objective,
so
that
better
you
as
a
teacher
acceptable
is
guided
on
the
task
are
of
you
are
necessary
are
to
of
give.
entries
4.
4.
It
caters
the
needs
and
nature
of
the
students
Experiment using
a
small bucket,
penny
and
(confidence,
The
needed
materials
such
as 3rope
bulbs, pair of
electrical tape,
screws,allscrew
illustration
Applying
creativity
and
information/
necessary
itswires,
important
the driver,
well
selected
quality;
some
acceptable
acceptable
Second,
make
sure is
that
theinitiative.
task
you
give
will
make
studentsand
actually
perform.
5.
5.
There
a
criteria
on
how
to
check
the process
itquality,
served
as basis
forpresent
giving
grades
information)
board
and etc.
you
are
tasked
to connect
the
bulbs,
switches
and
the
source
by using
the wire
in order to form a
Measure
the
amount
ofabout
learning
that
the
students
obtained
after
the
discussion
details
information/
information/det
required
and very
manyand
arerelevantare
well
quality.
quality, not
6. 6.circuit.
The process-oriented
task
consistent
to the
parallel
sure
to
connect
eachisitem
to its about
designated
place
andlearning
wrap thetarget
open
wires or connected wores by
his/her
details
ails
needed
information/det
Present andBe
explain
the
given activity
substantial.
well
selected
and
Limited
well selected
Learning
Activities
(Specific
tasks):
using electrical
tapepresentation
to
avoid short
circuit. his/ her
about
his/her
ails
selected
substantial.
selection and
and very
Demonstrate
the learning process
effectively
What
conditions
are
necessary
for
a
use
performance
Learning
Activities
(Specific
What specific
specific
conditions
are tasks):
necessarypresentation
for and
a successful
successful presentation
use of
of my
my process-oriented
process-oriented
performance
substantial.
minimal
assessment
What
Demonstration
specific
design?
conditions
of the activity
are necessary
(centrifugalfor
force)
a successful use of my product-oriented performance
assessment
design?
substantial
substantial.
In
a
given
materials,
the
student
task
is
to
connect
the
bulbs,
switches
and
the
source
by
using the
assessment
design?
Possess and utilize
effective performance
.
wire
in
order
to
form
Through
a
series
the
circuit.
use
of
The
provided
student
materials,
must
be
students
careful
to
will
connect
be
able
each
to
draw
item/
series
material
and
to
parallel
its
designated
combination
Assessment
What
specificTasks:
conditions are necessary for successful use of my process-oriented performance
The
process-oriented
performance
design
necessary
to the
use learning
when
I am
assessing
the
process
place
with
Making
attached
and
use
a final
four
electric
output
resistors
tape
(small
to
in cover/
an
loop-the
entire
wrap
branch
loop
theassessment
roller
open
ofincircuit
wires
to avoid
serves
short
as their
circuit.
product
in a specific
subjectItmatter.
assessment
A successful
design?
use
of
PBA
can
be
achieved
acoaster)
waythat
that,
it is
correlates
with
objectives.
is necessary
on
how
the
To
students
have
a
come
successful
up
with
use
a
of
correct
my
product-oriented
product
or
output.
design.
It
is
very
It
is
necessary
appropriate
for
and
me
effective
to
based
to
on
use
the
in
rubrics
a
problem
as a
Correlates
with
the
learning
objective
to be linked with the learning objective; this will help in guiding a particular task. When making a particular activity
solving,
criteria
for
steps
making
in
dancing
evaluation.
or
cooking,
Focusing
also
on
in
the
research
students
works,
product
showing
will
serve
the
process
as
a
guide
of
carbon-oxygen
for
a
successful
cycle,
use
water
of
this
cycle,
(e.g.
a teacher should
prepare
a criteria/
rubric as basisCreative,
for evaluating
students
performance. Thus,
it serves
Creative,
neat
Creative,
Minimal
No creativity,
1. Cooking),
Presentation
nitrogen
design,
thus,
cycle
To
have
itwhat
and
is necessary
aphotosynthesis.
successful
that
use
the
of
Itcriterion
can
process-oriented
alsoaIbe
may
used
usein
performance
islaboratory
not dealing
activity
design,
withneat
the
just
first
learners
like
andexperiments.
foremost
rather than
thing
Itproduct.
is
toimportant
consider
In that
is
that
that
as a guide
on
students
need
to
develop
performance.
and
has
neat
and
and
creativity,
disarray
of
entries
Creates
Assessment
meaningful
Tasks:
learning
it
there
way,
must
my
are
be
criterion
criterias
based
on
would
that
the will
be
learning
more
serve
objective,
focus
asastandards
on the
so organization
that
in
giving
you
as
grades
aof
teacher
the
so
materials
that
isan
guided
students
itself
on will
the
andbe
task
of guided
the
you
product.
are
on necessary
how to In
improve
to give.
their
Each group will present their strong
output.
has astudents actually
average
neat with
and no
Second, make sure that thevery
performance.
task you give will make
perform.
impact/appeal
strong
impact/appeal
minimal
impact/appeal
Appropriatene
The output is very
The output is
The output
The output
The output
Arose
Criteria
Each
Every
students
for
group
group
Rubrics
interest
will
should
for
present
Assessing
have
their
a
presentor
Learning
output.
to
report
their
work.
.
impact.
.
impact/appeal
. shows no
ss
and
appropriate
and
appropriate
shows
shows
a
little
What
should
of this reactions
design consider?
Thebasic
otherpoints
group will
give the
theiruser
comments,
or suggestions to the work of the group presentor.
.
congruency
What
basicof
pointscongruent
should the
to the
user of this
anddesign to consider?
congruency but
congruency
and
congruency
What
the
output
basic
points
topic
should
the
user
of
this
congruent
design
to
consider?
a
little
not
appropriateness
and
Successfully
The exchange
Presentation
othercaters
group
ofofthe
will
feedback,
activity
multiple
have toreactions
intelligences
give comments,
must besuggestion
observable.to the work of other group.
user
ofwork
this design
should
the that
topic
the
learning
appropriate
objective is
forrelevanttointhe
thetopic
process-oriented
appropriaten
I willThe
rate
their
(output)
usingconsider
the rubric
that
we
had agreed.
TheThe
user
should
consider
that
thethe
criteria
are all about
the
product of
He appropriate
must also ess
consider
that
performance.
user
should
keep in
mind
process-oriented
theperformance
topic
is the
not learner.
suited and
in to
allthe
kinds
not
all
subject
In
The
making
matter
user
of
this
is
this
suited
kind
process-oriented
Submitted
of
with
design,
this
design.
as
a
performance
facilitator,
Submitted
The
user
I
must
should
assessment
make
also
Submitted
sure
keep
design
that
in
a
mind
should
I
can
that
develop
consider
Submitted
this
design
their
the
2
metacognition
learning
is
necessary
Submitter
target
for
if
it
3is
1.
Promptness
Improving
of
subject
By the
Through
Organization
matter.
the
rubric
the
learning
use
of
wein
the
of
agreed,
outcome
rubric,
activity
I will
Ill be
judge
abletheir
to rate
output.
them in accordance to the performance they had showed.topic
through
consistent
involving
the
the
or
use
relevant
higher
of
process-oriented
order
because
thinking
ahead
the
of
skills
learning
performance
the
which
target
enables
on
design.
and
the
the
I
should
assessment
student
week
also
to
make
after
consider
tool
are
the
their
dependent
the
work
use
weeks
the
of
the
best
to
after
each
learning
while
other.
students
target
weeks
The
wherein
user
are
or
more
After
presenting
I
will
ask
questions.
submission
it will serve
should
learning,
also
applying
consider
as a guide
their
the
ifknowledge
my
subject
schedule.
design
matter
through
is relevant
if it experience.
is appropriate
on
schedule.
the specific
In or
this
suited
topic,
case,
schedule.
because
for
theituser
is necessary
not
should
all subject
consider
the
that
schedule.
the
matter
that
assessment
the
are task
applicable
after
made
toolthe
isby
for a
connected
process-oriented
the
After
Their
Creativity
student
presenting
work
towere/are
the
and
willperformance
learning
relevance
serve
I all
willacceptable
as
ask
target.
their
of
some
assessment.
the
product/
output
questions
it should
output
be
related
based
in a subject
toon
their
the matter
outputs.
criterion
resistance.
of the rubrics.
schedule.
1. 1.
What can you observe on the parallel circuit that you assembled?
2. 2.
What are the things to be observed in order to avoid accidents specifically short circuit?
4.
4.
Since there is a separate pathways, what will happen to the remaining bulbs if one bulb burns out?
Share this:
Twitter1
Facebook12
Related
READING COMPREHENSION OF BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION IN NORTHERN NEGROS STATE
COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Field Study 4 by Jay Ar Aspero
With 6 comments
Field Study 3: Technology in the Learning Environment
With 19 comments
1.
Reply