1

Final Report
Week 3
1

Paula Davila1. Angie Silva2

Facultad ingeniera, pregrado, ingeniera en automatizacin, ULS, Bogot D.C, Colombia
pdavila15@unisalle.edu.co
1
Facultad ingeniera, pregrado, ingeniera, ULS, Bogot D.C, Colombia
asilva60@unisalle.edu.co

III.

First Authors Abstract Review and adjust values for a

circuit of seven resistors with relative values and with two
sources one by providing a quantity of 10 volts and
another by providing a quantity of 1 ampere.

SIMULATION

Second Authors Abstract To perform and compare the

results of the calculations and simulation.
Review the implementation of the calculations in a
circuit.
Index TermsCircuit , Current, voltage, current,
resistance.
I.DIAGRAM CIRCUIT.

IV.

II.
V1 = 10V
I1 = 1A
R1 = 220
R2 = 47
R3 = 27
R4 = 51
R5 = 150
R6 = 100
R7 = 100

VALUES

VALUES CALCULUS

3
RESISTANCE
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
D.

Current
RESISTANCE
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

VALUE
16.393V
3.278V
1.269V
4.543V
2.111V
18.815V
18.817V
VALUE
321.2mA
69.62mA
69.61mA
251.63mA
1.1A
626..9mA
368.75mA

3) Perceptual Error
E.

Voltage
RESISTANCE

1)
A.

Theorist Values
Voltage
RESISTANCE
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

B.

VALUE
16.385V
3.275V
1.254V
4.529V
2.191V
18.809V
18.809V

Current
RESISTANCE
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

2) Experimental Values
C.

R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

Voltage

VALUE
321.26mA
69.67mA
69.67mA
251.59mA
0.996A
626.97mA
368.81mA

F.

Current
RESISTANCE
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

% Error
Porcent
-0,0488
-0,0916
-1,1961
-0,3091
3,6513
-0,0318
-0,0425
% Error
Porcent
0,0186
0,0717
0,0861
-0,0158
-10,441
0,0116
0,0162

According to the development of the practice was able to

observe a few results very consistent despite the variations
found which is the maximum obtained was 1 and the lowest
was 0.2 , according to the expected results they had difficulties
in regard to the other additional source that he should be put
into the circuit of 1 A, in spite of this practice is development
positively already that in the results can be seen the minimum
variations obtained, these variations could not be taken
perhaps by the addition of the other source or in the decimal
places from 3 that are in the calculator.
From the obtained results it was possible to appreciate an error
margin between the theoretical and experimental results that

4
take us to a few percentages of error in the voltage and in the
current that covers the circuit, between the results of margin of
error of the voltage a few values were between-1.1931 being
this the smallest and correspond to the resistance number 3
and 3.6513 being this the tallest correspond to the resistance
number 5, as one can observer in the previous table (voltage).
Of the values that they correspond to the values table with
respect to the percentage error, it is possible observer changes
of percentages of error that they are between-10.441 being this
the smallest and correspond to the resistance number 5, and
0.0861 being this the highest value and correspond to the
resistance number 3 from these results it can be analyzed that
the percentages of error more high places and or more
shallows in the current and voltage correspond to the
resistances 3 and 5.
CONCLUSIONS
It was found that when using the Low
Resistance resistances you can get A
stream of the 1A.
The results obtained were the expected
The variation was perhaps for the addition
of the other source
The margin of error in high and low voltage
corresponded to the resistance 3 and 5
The margin of error in high and low current
corresponded to the resistance 3 and 5