Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
23-37, 1998
1997 Elsevier Science Ltd
All rights reserved. Printed in GreatBritain
Pergamon
0892--6875(97)00136-2
0892--6875/98 $19.00+0.00
ABSTRACT
When high nickel-containing copper concentrates from South Africa started to comprise
part of the feed to a Zambian copper smelter at Mufulira, the level of Ni in the copper
anodes produced increased. The high nickel, copper anodes started to pose a problem at
the electrorefining stage as they led to a progressive increase in the Ni tenor of the
electrolyte. In order to produce high quality copper cathodes with less than 1 ppm Ni, it
became ~ecessary to bleed-off large volumes of foul electrolyte contaminated with nickel.
The study reported in this paper was part of the effort aimed at devising a less costly
method figr the removal of nickel in the electrolyte. The investigation was carried out on
a laboratory scale using contaminated electrolyte collected from the refinery. In thefirst
of two nu,thods considered, it was established that aqueous ammonia is able to precipitate
nickel from copper electrorefining bleed-off electrolyte, forming precipitates with 10-13%
Ni. A rn~zjor drawback of this method, however, was found to be the cost of ammonia
solution i'~sedfor Ni precipitation relative to the value of acid retained in the electrolyte.
The other method considered, involved partial electrolyte evaporation with a view of
crystallizing nickel sulphate from samples of bleed-off electrolyte issuing from a liberator
circuit, h! has been demonstrated that evaporative crystallisation of nickel sulphate could
be a very effective means of controlling nickel in the Mufulira tankhouse. At 66.5% and
80% electrolyte evaporation, 81% and 100% of the nickel was crystallized from foul
electrolyte, respectively. Over 95% of the sulphuric acid in initial samples was retained
in the purified electrolyte at a concentration of over I000 g/l. Initial estimates have
indicated that the cost of evaporative crystallisation of nickel sulphate would be quite low
compared to the value of sulphuric acid that would be present in the purified electrolyte.
1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserve~
Keywonis
Hydrometallurgy; electrorefining
23
24
The annual world production of copper is in excess of 8 million tonnes [1] and over 60% of this copper
is used for electrical engineering applications and electronics where high electrical conductivity is the main
requirement. For such high conductivity copper, it is necessary that the content of adverse impurity elements
be as low as possible. Nickel is said [2] to be one of the worst elements in contributing to decreased copper
electrical conductivity as it forms a solid solution with copper. Consequently, the maximum permissible
level of nickel in copper for electrical uses is 7.0 ppm.
At Mufulira Copper Refinery (MCR) of the Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines Limited, very high grade
copper cathodes are produced and the company has set 1.0 ppm as the maximum nickel content in its
cathodes. In the past when MCR only electrorefined anodes arising from low nickel-containing Zambian
concentrates (<0.01% Ni), cathodes with less than 1.0 ppm Ni were easily produced using plant operations
briefly outlined below. Detailed operational technical data of this plant can be found in reference [3].
MCR, with a design capacity of 270 000 tonnes cathode copper per annum, utilizes the conventional
electrorefining of smelter anodes averaging 99.7% Cu using an electrolyte of copper sulphate solution
acidified with sulphuric acid. In the electrolytic cells, copper and less noble metals like nickel, which are
present in the anodes, go into solution by electrochemical corrosion. At the copper cathode starter-sheet,
an equivalent amount of copper as that dissolved at the anode is preferentially discharged, to yield copper
metal averaging 99.99+% Cu. The less noble metals remain in the electrolyte which is recirculated. With
the passage of time, these less noble metals build-up in the electrolyte, but as long as the impurities remain
at low levels they do not deposit at the cathode.
To ensure that less noble metals remain at low levels in the electrolyte, copper tankhouses utilize liberator
circuits for the removal of bismuth and arsenic by electrowinning. A controlled amount of electrolyte is
bled-off from the refining cells and is fed to liberators where copper is first plated out to less than 10 g/l
before bismuth and arsenic electrowinning commences. After removal of bismuth and arsenic, the
electrolyte, which has over 300 g/l H2SO4 acid, is recycled to the refining cells as long as its nickel and
iron content is low.
On the Zambian Copperbelt, where nickel and iron never posed a serious problem in copper tankhouses,
operation of the liberator circuit was sufficient for impurity control [3]. Periodically, when nickel finally
accumulated to a high level, a portion of electrolyte from the liberator circuit was withdrawn and replaced
with fresh electrolyte. The rejected electrolyte was taken for use at a leach plant, incorporating solvent
extraction, located about 60 km from MCR.
In other locations of the world where nickel is high in copper anodes, it appears that the usual way of nickel
control is to feed the electrolyte issuing from the liberator circuit into an evaporator [4]. In the evaporator,
partial evaporation of the electrolyte leads to the crystallisation of nickel sulphate as well as iron sulphate.
After filtration of the sulphates formed, the remaining electrolyte is recycled.
When part of the feed to the Mufulira smelter started to include high nickel concentrates (0.1 - 0.2%) from
Palabora and Foskor of South Africa, the level of nickel in the anodes produced became higher than
previously (see Figure 1). Nickel in anodes, which had previously averaged 130 ppm, rose above 450 ppm,
and even above 1000 ppm for one month. The high Ni anodes caused a progressive increase in the nickel
content of the electrolyte in the electrorefining tankhouse. From a monthly average of about 2 g/l, the
monthly average Ni content of the electrolyte reached 10 g/l.
The top graph of Figure 1 shows that even during the period when high nickel anodes were used, nickel
in cathodes produced remained mostly below 1.0 ppm as desired. However, it can be noted that the nickel
content of the cathodes had risen compared to previous levels. Figure 1 also shows that the nickel content
of the cathodes roughly exhibited the same trend as the nickel content of the electrolyte.
It is further apparent from Figure 1, that in order to produce cathodes low in nickel during periods of very
25
high nickel in an(~les, the disposal of higher volumes of contaminated electrolyte is required. This resulted
in increased electrolyte replacement cost and the cost of disposing the foul electrolyte.
The study reported in this paper was part of the effort aimed at devising, for MCR, a less costly method
for the removal of nickel in the electrolyte so as to avoid its build-up to very high levels. The investigation
was carded out on a laboratory scale using contaminated electrolyte collected from the refinery.
Investigations performed at the smelter in an attempt to limit the level of nickel reporting into anodes
produced will be reported at a later stage.
NI In C a t h o d e s (ppm)
V, (mS/t Cu)
,2t
. A
o,,.l
40.,
o.,.
1 ''
~ 0 . 0 8
.o,
0
-8
-6
-4
-2
10
0
12
NI in Electrolyte (|/I)
II 0
$
6
-$
-6
-4
-I!
tl
10
1:!
NI In Anodes (ppm)
11100
gee
600
soo
0
-8
Fig. 1
-6
-4
-2
0
I
4
6
8
M o n t h s before end a l t e r
commencing uee of h l g h N I linodeo
10
12
Selected plant data for MCR before and after use of high Ni anodes commenced. Bottom diagram:
Ni in anodes; Middle diagram: Ni tenor of electrolyte; Top diagram: Ni content of cathodes and
volume of electrolyte bled-off per tonne Cu cathode produced
26
THEORY
The precipitation of nickel as a crystalline nickel (II) ammonium sulphate, (NH4)2SO4.NiSO4.6H20 double
salt, is used in the Sherritt-Gordon process [5] to produce Ni-free cobalt. Nickel is removed from solution
before cobalt pentammine reduction by hydrogen gas to yield cobalt metal. Nickel is present in the cobalt
pentammine solution as a diammine formed according to the reaction:
Ni2+(aq) + 2NH3(aq) = Ni(NH3)22+(aq)
(1)
aui~Mn')I'
aNi2.
(2)
anti,
Nickel is precipitated from the ammoniacal solution by adding sulphuric acid which causes ammonium
nickel sulphate to form. This greenish coloured double salt is precipitated according to the reaction:
Ni(NH3)22+(aq) + 2H(aq) + 2SO42-(aq) + 6H20 = (NH4)2SO4.NiSO4.6H20(s)
(3)
From the above reaction, the solubility product, Ksp, of (NH4)2SO4.NiSO4.6H20 can be written as:
K p'-
at~i~NH,)?,
a2 u,
a2so :.
(4)
Replacing in the above equation the activity of Ni(NH3)22+ with the value from Eqn. 2 results in Eqn. 5,
K 1 * ajv,. *
a2
NH 3
a2 u.
a2
SO,, z"
27
(5)
EXPERIMENTAL
A bulk sample of foul electrolyte about to enter the liberator circuit, analyzing 47.0 g/1 Cu, 11.0 g/l Ni, and
190 g/1 H2SO4, was collected and used in the experiments conducted. Due to the violent reaction caused
by excessive heat generation when ammonia solution contacted the electrolyte or vice-versa, Ni precipitation
with ammonia solution could not be done on foul electrolyte issuing from the liberator circuit which had
330 g/1 HISO 4.
20% ammonia solution was used as the precipitant and precipitation was carried out on 500 cm s electrolyte
samples in a 1 litre glass vessel that was placed in a thermostatted water bath. The lid of the precipitation
vessel had an allowance for a stirrer to be inserted to provide gentle agitation. The lid had two other ports,
one for a thermometer and the other for sample and precipitant addition. The effect of precipitant amount,
precipitation time, and temperature was investigated.
At the required time, precipitates formed from solution were quickly recovered on a ceramic filter. The
precipitates were then dried at 98C, weighed, and analyzed for nickel via a re-dissolution method. The
volume of each filtrate collected at room temperature was noted before taking a sample for analysis of
H2SO 4 acid and nickel content. Nickel analysis was performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry
while acid tenor was determined by acid-base titration. Filtrates collected at a higher temperature, it later
became apparent, could not be analyzed and such filtrates were immediately used for producing secondary
precipitates.
28
NI Preoipltated (%)
1001]
Temperature [
r:
.ol y
o
Fig.2
12
16
20
24
Tlme (Hour)
28
32
36
Ni precipitation from MCR bleed-off electrolyte at 50C and at room temperature. (Electrolyte
volume=500 cm3; volume 20% NH 3 solution=222 cm 3)
When precipitation experiments with 222 cm 3 ammonia solution were performed at room temperature, much
higher nickel precipitation (86.6%) was achieved, as would be expected if ammonium nickel sulphate is less
soluble at lower temperature. The results of the room temperature experiments are also shown in Figure 2.
What also became apparent from the results presented in Figure 2 was that Ni precipitation using ammonia
occurred slowly. Consequently, further precipitation experiments were performed for 24 hours.
Ni Precipitation at Different Temperatures and Total Precipitation when Cooled to Room
Temperature
The lower Ni precipitation at a higher temperature was confirmed in other experiments, in which precipitates
were recovered in two stages. To the foul electrolyte at the required precipitation temperature, 222 cm 3 of
29
ammonia solution was added and the temperature maintained for 24 hours. Filtration quickly followed after
this to recover a "primary "precipitate. The filtrate was allowed to c o d in air to room temperature and a
second, the "secondary" precipitate which formed, was then collected. Figure 3 shows the results of this set
of experiments.
In addition to showing a decrease of nickel primary precipitation at a higher temperature, Figure 3 shows
that in the range studied, and at a constant ammonia solution addition of 222 cm 3, the total Ni precipitated
was more or less constant and independent of the temperature for primary precipitation. Figure 3 allows a
conclusion to be raade that if nickel was to be precipitated from foul electrolyte by the addition of ammonia
solution, the final temperature to which the solution is cooled would have a very strong influence on the
level of nickel removed.
NI Precipitated ('It)
100
80
o ._..-~
60
20
Total
0
-a--
25
Fig.3
Primary
$0
38
40
48
60
65
Temperature ('(3)
eO
e5
70
Acid Retained in the Purified Electrolyte and Its Value Relative to the Cost of Ammonia Used for Ni
Precipitation
When the acid remaining in the electrolyte after different ammonia additions was determined (Figure 5),
it became clear that very little acid was left in the electrolyte with high ammonia usage. With 310 cm 3
precipitant added, only 3.4% of the initial acid was retained in the purified electrolyte.
30
The unsuitability of high ammonia usage could be seen more prominently when the cost of ammonia
solution used for Ni precipitation was computed to the value of acid that remained in the purified electrolyte.
This comparison is presented as a ratio of "ammonia cost" relative to the "acid value" and this information
is also shown in Figure 5. For 148 cm 3 ammonia solution added, the "ammonia cost"/"acid value" ratio was
6, but this ratio shot up to 317 with 310 cm 3 precipitant used. In the calculations made, the cost of 20%
ammonia solution per tonne ammonia contained was taken as 3 times the cost of 98.6% sulphuric acid per
tonne H2SO 4. This cost ratio remains almost the same on the local market although the actual prices of
ammonia solution and acid are hardly stable due to frequent currency devaluation.
Ni Precipitated (~.)
I00
80
60
40
20
-ig-- Primary
0
120
170
220
270
320
Ni primary precipitation at 50C using different precipitant amounts and the corresponding total
Ni precipitated. (Electrolyte volume=500 cm 3)
NI Precipitated (%)
Acid Retained (?.)
A m m o n i a C o s t / A c i d Value ( R a t i o )
320
tO0
........ ~ ............. e ........ -El'/
/
80
240
60
160
40
""*
i --13--
80
20
0
120
170
220
270
320
V o l u m e A m m o n i a S o l u t i o n Added ( c m S )
Fig.5
Ni precipitated and acid retained (at room T) with different precipitant amounts used. Plotted
alongside the ratio "ammonia cost"/"Acid value". (Electrolyte volume=500 cm 3)
31
The massive increase in the cost of ammonia solution relative to the value of acid retained at high ammonia
solution usage is an indication of the possible reaction of excess ammonia with free acid according to the
reaction;
NH3(aq) + H+(aq) --~ NH4+(aq)
(6)
Such acid consuraption would be in addition to the acid consumed by the Ni precipitation reaction as
represented by Eqn. [3].
Thus, although able to remove Ni from foul electrolyte, ammonia solution was found unsuitable on account
of the low residual acid in the remaining electrolyte. Furthermore, the method would be costly if it had to
achieve substantial Ni removal. The concentration of residual acid in the purified electrolyte after Ni
precipitation couhJ perhaps be improved upon by the use of ammonia gas instead of ammonia solution, but
this was not investigated. It would appear, however, that even with ammonia gas, a low amount of acid
would remain at high levels of Ni precipitation. This is because if the Ni became rather low in the
electrolyte any ingoing ammonia gas would more readily encounter and react with free acid than with the
relatively sparse Ni cations.
In all the experiments conducted, copper was not precipitated as evidenced by its presence in only trace
amounts in the precipitates. The copper must have remained in solution as Cu 2+cations. Even though copper
was not precipitated, which is desirable, another important consideration regarding Ni precipitation with
ammonia solution or gas would be the effect of ammonium cations resulting from Eqn. 6 on refinery
operations, if the purified electrolyte was to be recycled. This would have to be investigated.
THEORY
Evaporative crystallisation, as used for Ni control in copper tankhouses, involves the evaporation of some
of the water from the bled-off foul electrolyte so that the solubility limit of nickel sulphate in the remaining
acid-enriched liquor is exceeded.
The crystallisation of nickel sulphate occurs according to the reaction:
Ni:+(aq) + SO42-(aq) = 6H20 ~ NiSO4.6H20(s )
(7)
Figure 6 shows tile effect of temperature on the solubility in water of nickel sulphate and a few other
selected metal sulphates, based on data from Perry []7. The general trend exhibited in the diagram is that
the solubility of metal sulphates decreases with decreasing temperature. Therefore by cooling the hot
electrolyte, the excess nickel sulphate soluble at high temperature would erystallise, thus increasing the
amount of Ni removed from solution. Thus in the experiments carried out, evaporation at high temperature
was followed by cooling, before recovering the solid nickel sulphate formed.
The effectiveness of evaporative crystallisation for Ni control has to be gauged not only on the amount of
nickel removed from the foul electrolyte and acid retained in the purified electrolyte, but also on the cost
of evaporation.
HIIE II-I-B
32
8airdlnolved.9
'1
eo
40
2(] ~ ~ ~-I~ICUS04
10
20
80
40
60
60
70
80
80
Temperature,
100
Fig.6 Effect of temperature on the solubility of selected metal sulphates per 100 g water [7]
EXPERIMENTAL
A bulk sample of electrolyte issuing from the liberator was collected and used in the experiments. The
electrolyte analyzed 2.0 g/l Cu, 0.59 g/l Ca, 11.0 g/l Ni, 2.3 g/l Fe and 330 g/1 H2SO4.
In the experiments conducted, 400 cm 3 samples of the liberator electrolyte were placed in beakers. These
samples were heated on a hot plate set at 400C for different durations, so as to attain different degrees of
electrolyte evaporation. The hot plate temperature used achieved rapid evaporation without sputtering the
beaker contents.
After heating, the samples were removed from the hot plate and cooled overnight to room temperature. The
crystals formed were removed on a ceramic filter and the filtrate collected, The volume of filtrate collected
at room temperature was noted before taking a sample for analysis of H2SO4 acid, nickel, copper, calcium,
and iron. The acid content was determined by acid-base titration while all the other analyses were done by
atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The crystals formed were not analyzed, as all the information required
could be calculated from filtrate analyses.
Removalof nickelfromcopperelectrorefiningbleed-offelectrolyte
33
% Crystalll=d
l
......................
6O
.........
N~-
40!
0
60
Fig.7
Iron
60
70
Volume%EleotrolyteEvaporated
80
Percentage of Ni, Fe, Ca, and Cu removed from the foul electrolyte at different degrees of
electrolyl:e evaporation
18o.
t
% Acld Retained
40 '
1900
20f
0c
50
Fig.8
~
,
AcidConoentratlon
T
60
70
Volume%ElectrolyteEvaporated
]600
80
"800
Percentage H2SO4 acid retained and its concentration in the purified electrolyte at different degrees
of foul e;(ectrolyte evaporation
34
includes the results for the removal of these metals from solution. In all the tests done, and these were at
50% electrolyte evaporation and above, all the calcium and copper and most of the iron must have formed
sulphates which were filtered from the purified electrolyte. Although the sulphates of these metals would
contaminate the nickel sulphate formed, this disadvantage is regarded as minor compared to the greater goal
of purifying the electrolyte. The same can be said regarding the loss of the initial 2 g/l copper which would
not be available for recycle to the tankhouse.
The results presented above demonstrated how effective evaporative crystallisation could be for controlling
the level of Ni at MCR, but the cost of energy required for the process had to be considered. A related
aspect which also had to be considered was the volume of liberator electrolyte which would have to be
bled-off for evaporation in order to maintain suitable levels of Ni in the electrorefining tankhouse.
4
-i
....
......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O
E
R at E 60%
0
I
"0
Q
Q
0.048
0.04
1 R at E - 60%
0.032
>-
0.066
i.-a.- V at E 80%
,,~'~
o
+
0.024
VatE-60%
v at E - 88.5
0.016
0.008
0
0
Fig.9
2
4
6
8
10
Desired Ni Tenor in Tankhouse (ppm)
0
12
Electrolyte bleed-off volume, V, to maintain specified Ni levels in the tankhouse if the evaporator
achieves the indicated % evaporation, E. Plotted alongside the ratio, R="energy cost"/"acid value".
(Ni in anodes--0.068%)
Figure 9 assumes steady state operation of one DC unit of the electrorefining tanldaouse, comprising 12
sections of 40 cells each, in which 164.7 tonnes of anodes averaging 0.068% Ni dissolve per day. Appendix
1 sets out the method which was used to generate the data for plotting Figure 9. A computer program in
GwBASIC was written to facilitate calculation of bleed-off volumes at different levels of Ni in anodes and
extent of vaporization in the evaporator. Hence the data plotted in Figure 9 is merely an example of the
results which could be obtained from the computer program and the diagram is drawn to illustrate the
overall conclusions which were arrived at.
Removalof nickelfromcopperelectrorefiningbleed-offelectrolyte
35
It can be seen in Figure 9 that there is an exponential increase in the volume of electrolyte to be bled-off
if it is desired to :maintain a very low level of Ni in the tankhouse electrolyte. At the same time, for a
particular percentage of electrolyte evaporation, a low bleed-off would not sufficiently decrease Ni in the
tankhouse. It is also apparent that the electrolyte to be bled-off to maintain a particular Ni level decreases
at higher levels of electrolyte evaporation, although this decrease is minimal above about 66.5% evaporation.
36
sulphate from copper electrorefining bleed-off electrolyte would be a very effective method for nickel
control in the MCR tankhouse. In addition, the method would also achieve the removal of calcium and a
significant amount of iron from the bled-off foul electrolyte. The purified electrolyte would have a sulphuric
acid concentration in excess of 1000 g/1 if 66.5-80% of the bled-off foul electrolyte had to be evaporated.
At the same time, over 95% of the acid initially present in the foul electrolyte would be retained in the
purified electrolyte, which would be available for recycle to the tankhouse. Initial estimates have indicated
that the cost of evaporative crystallisation of nickel sulphate would be quite low compared to the value of
sulphuric acid that would be present in the purified electrolyte.
REFERENCES
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
APPENDIX 1
Calculation of Electrolyte Volume to be Bled-off for Evaporation to Control Nickel at Specified Levels
If M kg is the mass of anodes, containing an average of x% Ni, which corrode into the electrolyte per day,
Mass Ni entering tankhouse via anodes = O.01Mx kg/day.
If Ni in the tankhouse electrolyte is to be kept at c ppm, then the bled-off electrolyte, V m3/day, also has
a Ni content of e ppm.
Therefore, mass Ni in bleed-off = 10-3 *Vc kg/day.
Assuming the evaporator to which the bled-off electrolyte is fed is set to evaporate E% of the electrolyte,
and if the fraction of Ni precipitated from the bleed-off = x (Read off Figure 7),
then fraction of Ni in bled-off volume which remains in the purified electrolyte recycled = 1 - x.
Therefore, mass Ni remaining in purified electrolyte that is recycled =
10 -3 * V c * ( 1
- o~)
kg
V:
10x
0.997ca
m3/t Cu cathode
37
(6)
For bleed-off volumes plotted in Figure 9, x was taken as 0.068 while a which was experimentally
determined was read off Figure 7. The concentration of Ni to be maintained in the tankhouse, c, was varied
from 0.5 to 11.
C o r r e s p o n d e n c e o n p a p e r s p u b l i s h e d in Minerals Engineering is i n v i t e d , p r e f e r a b l y b y em a i l to b w @ m i n e r a l s . a v e l . c o . u k , o r b y F a x to + 4 4 - ( 0 ) 1 3 2 6 - 3 1 8 3 5 2