Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DOI: 10.5923/j.ijtte.20140305.03
Abstract Effective management of urban congestion derives directly from accurate data collection and analysis at
intersections. This study reports the outcome of a comparative investigation of the cost and efficiency of electronic and
manual methods of collection of traffic delays for an urban rotary with the purpose of selection of the most preferred strategy
for measurement at junction delays. The operation of traffic at peak period at Tanke roundabout Ilorin, Nigeria was evaluated
with observatory (manual) and video-graphic for the data capture and analysis. A Sony video-graphic digital camcorder, type
GIF, and full size image (460329) was used to collect data on the flow rate and pattern operation at typical morning and
evening peak periods, the data were analysed with corresponding cost, accuracy, easiness and convenience. Three
improvement options; geometry modification to 2-lane on all the legs, 2-4 phase traffic signalization alone and geometry
modification plus 2-phase signalization, were evaluated for a probable level of serviceability for the junction. The
roundabout presently operating at LOS F respectively improved to LOS C for the geometry modification, the 2-4 phase fixed
traffic signalization; but LOS A for the combined geometry/2-phase signalization strategy. The cost of data capture was
8,700 for the time lapse videography and 11,000 formanual method which implies that the video-time lapse data capture
and analysis was 26% cheaper than the manual observatory counting method, and thus recommended as preference for an
urban rotary delay management.
Keywords LOS, Flow rate, Traffic signalization, Traffic delay, Rotary junction and geometric features
1. Introduction
Among the preferred potential alternatives to traffic
control signals at traffic intersections is the rotary, probably
because it assures of better benefits, MUTCD (2003) and
FHWA (2003). However, improvement of the operation at
rotary intersection can offer safety and better management of
the probable congestion and delays in terms of accuracy,
efficient and cost-effectiveness data capture throne as first
direct step. Most of the times, traffic streams at junctions and
at peak periods operate at forced flow, low speeds and traffic
grid lock at the roundabout, especially when capacity is
being impacted into considerable challenging and negative
effects which cannot be solved by the traffic rules alone.
Proper congestion management to ensure efficient
movement of people, goods and services, strong economic
and political ties between regions and eventual regional
transport development is much desired (Onakomaiya and
Ekanem, 2007); which is both dependent on traffic
signalization control and facility capacity modification.
Traffic data capture with observatory manual approach has
* Corresponding author:
idowuitiola@gmail.com (Itiola I. O.)
Published online at http://journal.sapub.org/ijtte
Copyright 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved
Entry
width (m)
Overall width
(m)
Approach width
(m)
Tipper
Garage
5.93
21.00
5.40
Pipe line
5.93
21.00
5.40
Tanke
junction
8.23
12.70
7.70
University
8.23
12.70
7.70
223
Tanke Junction
N
Pipe-line
New
GRA
S
University
Figure 1. Layout of Tanke Roundabout
224
(1)
= +
(2)
= .
(3)
(4)
()
()
3600
+ (900) +
1
1 +
3600
450
(5)
(6)
( )
=1 )
= =1
(
(7)
Lqi =
3600
(veh)
= () ,
= (/)per ith
(8)
225
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing traffic turning movements and adjusted volumes for 4-phase signalization at Tanke roundabout (7-8am)
Table 2. Morning and Evening Peak Hour Traffic Movements (veh) on the Approaches of the Roundabout
Period
Tipper Garage
University
Pipeline
Tanke Junction
Time interval
LT
RT
TH
LT
RT
TH
LT
RT
TH
LT
RT
TH
7:00 7:15
148
125
94
21
23
257
25
28
21
43
179
7:15 7:30
165
161
73
19
22
241
49
55
30
14
23
198
7:30 7:45
207
177
101
17
169
69
89
26
18
29
210
7:45 8:00
185
175
96
10
208
51
54
17
23
40
221
8:00 8:15
171
174
72
10
31
218
43
50
21
17
37
180
8:15 8:30
143
99
45
18
131
45
40
23
26
29
128
8:30 8:45
135
121
43
20
28
210
47
41
19
21
31
149
8:45 9:00
130
132
42
18
29
219
51
49
16
15
22
143
3:45 4:00
309
330
170
55
71
373
49
47
21
29
51
161
4:00 4:15
274
209
158
39
42
199
73
75
58
41
71
169
4:15 4:30
339
307
200
19
17
398
101
131
49
38
56
230
4:30 4:45
319
299
148
09
17
159
74
81
32
43
59
180
4:45 5:00
215
120
81
13
26
270
62
71
39
55
61
212
5:00 5:15
231
222
79
12
23
253
60
69
33
59
66
240
5:15 5:30
239
167
132
18
25
239
49
45
49
40
48
189
5:30 5:45
232
209
108
15
21
242
51
52
34
38
69
207
226
Approach
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
Tipper Garage
255
514
1181
1568
1574
1295
8.7
11.6
7.08
51.69
Pipe line
643
1022
1758
2071
1158
933
245
560
17.86
102.77
Tanke junction
1181
2621
1294
2088
1492
921
15
581
50.31
263.56
University
1844
2209
380
692
2150
1926
2.91
51.22
222.13
Table 4. The Summary of the operating traffic parameter for video-time lapse capture
Entry flows (vph)
Approach
Mean-delay (spv)
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
7-8am
4-5pm
Tipper Garage
228
458
1126
1548
1613
1309
7.2
100
4.18
47.45
Pipe line
556
1035
1648
2122
1237
896
163
627
10.19
107.24
Tanke junction
1707
2667
1126
1943
1613
1025
7.2
414
31.30
276.33
University
1739
2219
409
694
2130
1924
2.1
2.9
31.88
229.91
University
Pipe-line
Tipper Garage
LT
TH
RT
LT
TH
RT
LT
TH
RT
LT
TH
RT
168
815
82
140
843
152
254
75
276
72
95
190
Tanke Junction
0.89
189
916
0.89
92
157
1197
947
0.89
171
285
1275
84
0.89
310
679
81
107
214
402
1900
1900
1900
1900
1.44
1.44
1.19
1.19
0.982
0.998
0.977
0.98
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.950
0.950
0.990
1.000
0.970
0.940
0.700
0.720
0.680
0.600
0.997
0.998
0.999
0.998
0.990
0.998
0.950
0.950
3676
3916
2627
2251
227
Table 6. Signal phase, Effective green time, Lane group capacity and Remarks
Phase
Movement
Flow
ratio
University, TH
0.250
University, RT
0.025
Tanke Junction, TH
0.242
Tanke Junction, RT
0.044
University, LT
0.051
Tanke Junction, LT
0.040
Pipe-line, TH
0.032
Pipe-line, RT
0.118
Tipper Garage, TH
0.048
Tipper Garage, RT
0.095
Pipe-line LT
0.109
Tipper Garage, LT
0.036
Table 7.
Proposed
green time
Capacity of
lane group
Volume
/capacity ratio
0.250
21
1287
0.71
0.051
613
0.31
0.118
10
438
0.71
0.109
394
0.71
Remarks
OK/under saturated
OK/under saturated
OK/under saturated
OK/under saturated
Leg
Uniform delay, d1
Random delay, d2
Control delay, d
LOS
16.9
3.3
20
25
26.7
1.3
28
23.6
9.4
33
14
24.3
10.4
35
13
Whole Intersection
26sec/veh
= i
.+
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
= ( + ) +
=
= ( ) + ( ) +
(16)
(17)
228
Signalization Type
LOS
2-Phase
3-phase
4-Phase
Table 9. Signal phase, effective green time, capacity, lane group and their remarks
Phase
Movement
Flow
ratio
Pipe-line LT
0.283
Pipe-line, TH
0.077
Pipe-line, RT
0.260
Tipper Garage, LT
0.074
Tipper Garage, TH
0.058
Tipper Garage, RT
0.195
University, RT
0.033
University, LT
0.068
University, TH
0.327
Tanke Junction, LT
0.056
Tanke Junction, RT
0.034
Tanke Junction, TH
0.338
Flow ratio
for critical
lane group
Proposed
green time
Capacity of
lane group
Volume
/capacity ratio
0.75
17
414.3
0.283
0.76
20
1244.8
0.338
Remarks
Table 10. Level of service in terms of delay for proposed phase plan
Phase
Uniform delay, d1
Random delay, d2
Control delay, d
LOS
12.2
11.8
24
21
10.5
4.5
15
24
Videography method
Items
No
Cost (#)
Personnel employed
2000
3600
Equipment rental:
Tripod stand
Measuring tape
Ranging pole
Stop watch
Empty disk
100
Total
Market survey carried out in Ilorin, Kwara state, Nigeria (2012).
7000
No
Cost (#)
8500
8500
800
100
11,400
200
8700
Table 12.
Approach
229
Summary of Manual and Electronic Method Peak Entry (Vi), Circulating (F) and Maximum (FMAX) Flows
Morning & Afternoon peak, Vi
Manual
Electronic
Manual
Electronic
Electronic
Tipper Garage
255
514
228
458
1181
1568
1126
1548
1574
1295
1613
1309
Pipe Line
643
1022
556
1035
1758
2071
1648
2122
1158
933
1237
896
Tanke Junction
1811
2621
1707
2667
1294
2088
1126
1943
1492
921
1613
1025
University
1844
2209
1739
2219
380
692
409
694
2150
1926
2130
1924
230
Morning
Afternoon
Manual
Electronic
Manual
Electronic
Degree
of saturation (v/c)
0.68
0.47
0.95
0.96
Average
delay (sec/veh)
33
31
35
35
Average
Queue length
(veh)
40
37
67
65
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
Performance
Characteristics
Morning
Evening
Manual
Electronic
Manual
Degree of
saturation (v/c)
1.08
1.00
1.51.5
Average delay
(sec/veh)
100
66
362
Average Queue
length (veh)
127
78
659659
Electronic
373
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
REFERENCES
[1]
231
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]