Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Part A
Things to notice:
Word order is variable, so subject and object will be probably be marked
through verb inflection
No distinction between definite and indefinite article in the language
Nouns:
The suffix -t is used to mark an object
Verbs:
-ar is the third person present declarative ending
-ehar is the third person present interrogative ending
So:
Tomu sekehar tashut
Does the/a footman seduce the/a diplomat?
Pantet tikar koche
The cook rebukes the scullery maid
o (Note the placement of subject/object is the reverse of English here
- must look carefully at the noun endings)
Does the daughter consult the dowager?
Maget sudehar duse
Part B
Possessives:
= suffix -l + the same vowel at the end of the possessed noun
e.g. claru = the earl
o The earl's nephew = clarulu(t) ronu(t)
The possessive ending must agree in case and number (though at this stage
we are just dealing with single nouns)
However, remember that you must add -t for objects (as seen with
clarulut farut - second sentence)
Verbs:
The suffix -omar signals negation
Nouns:
Nouns ending in -a seem to be invariable (no -t is added when it is the
object e.g. kita)
Tinela tapa retehar negu
Does the brother steal the maid's typewriter?
o Because tapa is invariable, one only knows it is the object because
negu lacks the -t.
You can work this out by finding a perfect tense sentence with a verb
you already know and compare it with the present tense form. E.g. retar
= [someone] steals) vs roretadu = [someone] has stolen
o So we see that ro- is a prefix and adu is the ending
Once you have established that ro- is a prefix - find examples where the
ending is not -adu and using the evidence work our what the different
endings mean
Negatives:
-omaner = negative ending for 3rd person plural present (vs. omar for
singular)
Can be gleaned by noting that in sentence 2 ronitadu = has tried, so
stem for try is "nit", which is seen again in sentence 5 as "nitomaner",
meaning [they] do not try
Plural perfect tense (third person) suffix = -anu
We know this from the last sentence "The visitors have tried" ronitanu
Roniksomadu masu laperar bakstula kita
The gardener has not refused to read the secretary's book
o Masu = gardener, nominative singular (compare with masuku - 2nd
sentence from bottom)
o niks = verb stem of refuse, with past tense prefix and suffix (the
latter of which also indicated negation)
o Laperar = infinitive (singular) of to read
Have the diplomats threatened to injure the earl's chauffeurs?
Tashuku rominehanu lamaraner clarukulut farakut
Diplomat (nominative) = tashu, so diplomats (nominative) = tashuku
We have established that -anu is the suffix for plural perfect, but what
about plural perfect interrogative?
o Note that the relationship between the singular perfect declarative
and the singular perfect interrogative is the addition of "eh" before
"adu" (so -adu vs. -ehadu") It therefore follows that we go from "anu" to "-ehanu" for the plural perfect interrogative form. Thus we
get: rominehanu