Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ON
RATIO ANALYSIS OF JAY ENTERPRISES
INDEX
Chapter
Contents
Page
No.
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Company Profile,
Research methodology,
Objectives of the study,
Scope Of The Study,
Type And Source Of Data,
Limitations,
Tools Of Analysis- Ratio
Analysis, Graphical Analysis
Chapter 3
Theoretical Background,
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project title: Financial Analysis
Company: Jay Enterprises.
Jay enterprise is an engineering firm established in 2007. It is into
manufacturing of precision auto components.
So, I was influenced to allocate the aim of this project to study the details
about these ratios and tools of capital budgeting and their possible effects
on the decisions made by not only people inside the company but also the
outsiders such as investors.
Research framework:
This study is based on the data about Jay Enterprises, Pune MIDC for a
detailed study of its financial statements, documents and system ratios
and finally to recognize and determine the position of the company.
CHAPTER 1
COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER 1
COMPANY PROFILE
Promoters and Company Profile
Name of Proprietor :
Name of unit
JAY Enterprises
Address
Nature of business :
Proprietary concern
Registered office
Experience of proprietor and technical feasibility of project:Rapidly advancing technology and pressure of social factors, added to
highly competitive and rapidly changing industrial environment, has
created a situation in which the success of an enterprise and possibly its
The expected growth in the production after purchase and installation will
be as follows:
ITEM
MONTHLY QTY.
12000
Governor bell
6000
Rocker fulcrum-038
7200
Rocker fulcrum-026
7200
7200
Starter plate
6000
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The secondary data were collected from the brochure of the Company, the
boards with the information displayed in the Company premises and,
from the Company we
4. Media and the general public are also interested in financial statements
of some companies for a variety of reasons.
Values used in calculating financial ratios are taken from balance sheet,
income statement and the cash flow of company, besides Ratios are
always expressed as a decimal values, such as 0.10, or the equivalent
percent value, such as 10%.
Industry ratios are important standards in view of the fact that each
industry has its own characteristics, which influence the financial and
operating relationships. But there are certain practical difficulties for this
method. First finding average ratios for the industries is such a headache
and difficult. Second, industries include companies of weak and strong so
the averages include them also. Sometimes spread may be so wide that
the average may be little utility. Third, the average may be meaningless
and the comparison not possible if the firms with in the same industry
widely differ in their accounting policies and practices.
What does ratio analysis tell us?
After such a discussion and mentioning that these ratios are one of the
most important tools that is used in finance and that almost every
business does and calculate these ratios, it is logical to express that how
come these calculations are of no importance.
What are the points that those ratios put light on them? And how can
these numbers help us in performing the task of management?
The answer to these questions is: We can use ratio analysis to tell us
whether the business
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
is profitable
has enough money to pay its bills and debts
could be paying its employees higher wages, remuneration or so on
is able to pay its taxes
is using its assets efficiently or not
has a gearing problem or everything is fine
is a candidate for being bought by another company or investor and
more.
But as it is obvious there are many different aspects that these ratios can
demonstrate. So for using them first we have to decide what we want to
know, then we can decide which ratios we need and then we must begin
to calculate them.
Which Ratio for whom:
As before mentioned there are varieties of people interested to know and
read these information and analyses, however different people for
different needs. And it is because each of these groups has different type
of questions that could be answered by a specific number and ratio.
Therefore we can say there are different ratios for different groups, these
groups with the ratio that suits them is listed below:
1. Investors: these are people who already have shares in the business
or they are willing to be part of it. So they need to determine
whether they should buy shares in the business, hold on to the
shares they already have or sell the shares they already own. They
Classification of Ratios:
A financial ratio can give a financial analyst an excellent picture of a
company's situation and the trends that are developing. A ratio gains
utility by comparison to other data and standards.
1. Profitability ratios which use margin analysis and show the return
on sales and capital employed.
2. Rate of Return Ratio (ROR) or Overall Profitability Ratio: The
rate of return ratios are thought to be the most important ratios by
some accountants and analysts. One reason why the rates of return
ratios are so important is that they are the ratios that we use to tell
if the managing director is doing their job properly.
3. Liquidity ratios measure the availability of cash to pay debt,
which give a picture of a company's short term financial situation.
4. Solvency or Gearing ratios measures the percentage of capital
employed that is financed by debt and long term finance. The
higher the gearing, the higher the dependence on borrowing and
long term financing. The lower the gearing ratio, the higher the
dependence on equity financing. Traditionally, the higher the level
of gearing, the higher the level of financial risk due to the increase
volatility of profits. It should be noted that the term Leverage is
used in some texts.
5. Turn over Ratios: or activity group ratios indicate efficiency of
organization to various kinds of assets by converting them to the
form of sales.
6. Investors ratios usually interested by investors.
Liquidity Ratios:
The two liquidity ratios, the current ratio and the acid test ratio, are the
most important ratios in almost the whole of ratio analysis and also the
simplest to use.
CHAPTER 3
THEORETICAL
BACKGROUND
CHAPTER 3
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Financial statements
Definition:
Financial statements (or financial reports) are formal records of a
business' financial activities. These statements provide an overview of a
business' profitability and financial condition in both short and long term.
CHAPTER 4
ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER 4
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Current ratio:
This ratio measures the solvency of the company in the short term.
Current assets are those assets, which can be converted in to cash within a
year. Current liabilities and provision are those liabilities that are payable
within a year. A current ratio2:1 indicates a highly solvent position.
Company consider a current ratio 1.33:1 as the minimum acceptable level
for providing working capital finance. The constituents of the current
assets are as important as the current assets themselves for evaluation of a
company solvency position.
Current asset
Current ratio =
__________________
Current liability
current ratio
2.50
2.00
current ratio
1.50
1.00
0.50
-
Interpretation:
A current ratio 2:1 indicates a highly solvent position. Company consider
a current ratio 1.33:1 as the minimum acceptable level for providing
working capital finance. It is high in year 2010-2011 therefore it is more
capable of paying its obligations. Thereafter it is low as comparatively
but under acceptable norms. CL is more in the year 2011-2012 which
shows a low ratio of 2.30 corresponding to the current assets in that year.
There are two terms of liquid asset and liquid liabilities in this formula,
Liquid asset is all current assets except the inventories and prepaid
expenses, because prepaid expenses cannot be converted to cash. The
liquid liabilities include all current liabilities except Company overdraft
and cash credit since they are not required to be paid off immediately.
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
-
Interpretation:
A quick liquid ratio of 1:1 indicates highly solvent position. This ratio
serves as a supplement to the current ratio in analyzing liquidity. It is 1.13
(average) in our case. In the year 2010-2011 it is high which interprets
that the CA of the firm is fast moving.
Leverage ratios:
The long-term financial stability of the firm may be considered upon its
ability to meet all its liabilities, including those not currently payable. The
ratios which are important in measuring the long term solvency ratio are
as follows:Debt-equity ratio:
Capital is derived from two sources shares and loans. It is quite likely for
only shares to be issued when the company is formed but loans are
invariably raised at some later date. There are numerous reasons for
issuing loan capital.
The ratio indicates the relationship between loan funds and net worth of
the company, which is known as gearing. If the proportion of debt to
equity is low, a company is said to be low geared, and vice versa. A debt
equity ratio of 2:1 is the norm accepted by financial institutions for
financing of projects. Higher debt- equity ratio may be permitted for
highly capital intensive industries like petrochemicals, fertilizers, powers
etc. the higher the gearing, the more volatile the return to the
shareholders. A debt equity ratio, which shows a declines trend over the
years, is usually taken as a positive sign reflecting on increased cash
accrual and debt and debt repayment in act, one of the indicatory a unit
turning sick is a risky debt equity ratio.
Usually when calculating ratio, the preference share capital is excluded
from debt, but if the ratio is show effect of use of fixed interest sources on
earnings available to the shareholders then it is to be included. On the
other hand, if the ratio is to examine financial solvency then preference
shares shall form part of the capital.
debt-eqity ratio
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
-
debt-eqity ratio
Interpretation:
In case of our organization there is improvement in D/E ratio year by
year. A debt-equity ratio, which shows a decline trend over the years, is
usually taken as positive sign reflecting on increased cash accrual and
debt and debt repayment in act. It is more in year 2008-2009 which
interprets the firm mostly rely on more debt may be for gross-operative
expenses.
Proprietary ratio:
It indicates the relationship between owners fund and total assets. And
shows the extent to which the owners fund are sunk in assets or different
kinds of it.
Shareholders net worth
Proprietary ratio = _______________________
Total assets
proprietary ratio
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
-
proprietary ratio
Interpretation:
The proprietary ratio is increasing year by year. It denotes that the
proprietors have provided the funds to purchase the assets of the concern
instead of relying on other sources of funds like Company borrowings,
trade creditors and others. It also indicates why the debt is decreasing
year by year.
5
4
3
2
1
0
Interpretation:
Interest coverage of 8.54 times would imply that even if the firms EBIT
were to decline
available for servicing the interest on loan would still be equivalent to the
claims of the lenders.
_________________________________________
Interest on loan + loan repayment in a year
DSCR
2.50
2.00
1.50
DSCR
1.00
0.50
-
Interpretation:
It is high in the first year of the concern, which is acceptable norm,
therefore it can service the debt sufficiently in this year. Servicing debt is
more in first year as also shown by debt-equity ratio therefore the ratio is
high in this year.
Inv.turn. Ratio
14.00
13.50
13.00
12.50
Inv.turn. Ratio
12.00
11.50
11.00
10.50
10.00
Interpretation:
The ratio in year 2008-2009 is low corresponding to other years which
show excessive inventory utilization than required. It declines in years
2011-2012 to 2012-2013 may be due to the stack up of inventory.
Interpretation:
The average consumption period is 29 days a year which is acceptable by
the norms of firm.
Interpretation:
The ratio is more in the year 2009-2010 compared to other years which
indicates the collection period is low for this fiscal. Also the credit sales
is more corresponding to increase in debtors which illustrates a high ratio.
Debt. Coll.period
26.00
25.00
24.00
23.00
22.00
21.00
20.00
Debt. Coll.period
Interpretation:
The average of debtors collection period is 23.82 which are lower than
the stated credit terms of the firm which is good for the firm. The
collection period is low in year 2009-2010 corresponding to other years
but debtors turnover ratio is high for this year which shows relaxation in
credit terms by the firm.
Cred.turn. Ratio
18.00
17.50
17.00
16.50
16.00
15.50
15.00
Cred.turn. Ratio
Interpretation:
A high turnover ratio indicates that payment to the creditors is quite
prompt but it also implies the full advantage of credit allowed by
creditors is not taken. A low ratio indicates that payment to creditors is
not quite prompt and it needs to be improved. In year 2010-2011 the ratio
is high which interprets that the accounts are settled rapidly.
21.50
21.00
20.50
20.00
19.50
Interpretation:
The creditors payment period is decreasing for the years 2008-2011
which is good for the firms credit rating. Thereafter it is increasing but in
accordance with acceptable norms.
FA turn. Ratio
6.00
5.00
4.00
FA turn. Ratio
3.00
2.00
1.00
-
Interpretation:
A high fixed asset ratio indicates the capability of the firm to earn
maximum sales with the minimum investing in fixed assets. So it shows
that the firm is using its assets more efficiently. There is scope for further
investments in fixed assets after 2010-2011.
TA turn. Ratio
2.50
2.00
1.50
TA turn. Ratio
1.00
0.50
-
Interpretation:
The ratio has increasing trend over the five year period which illustrates
that the firm is utilizing its total assets carefully year by year. The ratio in
year 2008-2009 to 2010-2011 shows the assets are at idle capacity and
can be utilized further.
WC turn. Ratio
6.10
6.05
6.00
5.95
5.90
5.85
5.80
5.75
5.70
5.65
5.60
WC turn. Ratio
Interpretation:
The firm has increasing trend which is better because it means that the
firm is generating a lot of sales compared to the money it uses to fund the
sales. A firm uses WC to purchase inventory and convert inventory into
sales. As the inventory turnover is low in year 2008-2009 the WC is
underutilized.
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
-
Interpretation:
The capital employed turnover ratio increases from 2008-2009 to 20102011 due to the decrease in capital employed. It means that the firm is
utilizing its capital wholly. The ratio is showing increasing trend in the
years thereafter also, because the sales are increasing in accordance with
capital employed.
Profitability ratios:
As the name itself suggests, this ratio is calculated to determine
profitability of the firm. The basic objective of almost every business is to
earn profit which is essential for survival of the business.
A business needs profits not only for its existence but also for its
expansion and diversification. The investors want inadequate return on
their investments, workers want higher wages, creditors want higher
security for interest and loan and the list could continue.
Gross profit is the profit we earn before we take off any administration
costs, selling costs and so on. So we should have a much higher gross
profit margin than net profit margin.
High ratios are favourable in this, since it indicates the business is earning
a good return on the sale of its merchandise.
Gross profit X 100
Gross profit ratio = _______________________________________
Sales
GP ratio
20.30
20.20
20.10
20.00
GP ratio
19.90
19.80
19.70
19.60
19.50
Interpretation:
The average of gross profit margin is 19.91 which are good for the firm
for further growth. A high gross profit shows good management. The
trend shows that COGS is increasing year by year. It may also indicate
higher sales price without corresponding increase in COGS. It also
indicates unsatisfactory basis of valuation of stock.
NP ratio
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
NP ratio
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
-
Interpretation:
There is substantial decline in administration, selling and distribution
expenses due to which there is low GP and high EBIT in year 2008-2009
to 2009-2010.
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
-
Interpretation:
The cash profit ratio shows increasing trend over the span of five years
which illustrates that the cash generation of the firm is efficient for
further operations of the firm. It also illustrates the firm is using the
depreciation charge efficiently and effectively. A result of increasing trend
may be also the reason behind the increase in DSCR.
15.00
10.00
5.00
(5.00)
Interpretation:
The increasing trend of this ratio shows that the firm is providing a strong
incentive for optimal utilization of the assets. It also indicates that the
profit margin and investment turnover are increasing. It is commonly
used as a measure for comparing the performance between business and
for assessing whether a business generates enough returns to pay for its
cost of capital. The first year shows loss, it seems to have failed to
maintain the earning rate on the funds employed.
Return on assets:
The profitability of the firm is measured by establishing relation of net
profit with the total assets of the organization. This ratio indicates the
efficiency of utilization of assets in generating revenue.
Net profit after tax X 100
Return on assets = _______________________________
Total assets
Ret. On assets
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
(5.00)
Ret. On assets
Interpretation:
The ratio is showing increasing trend over the period of five years which
shows that the firm is utilizing its resources efficiently. There is scope for
expansion after year 2011-2012.
Sr.no. Ratios
Years
08-09
Current ratio
1.88
2.10
2.39
2.30
2.32
1.05
1.12
1.28
1.09
1.02
Debt-equity ratio
3.04
1.81
0.86
0.31
0.00
Proprietary ratio
0.20
0.25
0.37
0.53
0.70
2.20
2.74
3.67
5.11
8.54
DSCR
2.20
1.21
1.35
1.43
1.55
11.39
13.54
13.45
13.10
13.09
32.03
26.96
27.14
27.86
27.89
14.40
16.35
15.66
15.20
15.14
10
25.35
22.32
23.31
24.01
24.11
11
16.18
17.11
17.55
16.98
17.00
12
22.56
21.34
20.79
21.49
21.47
13
FA turn. Ratio
2.15
3.41
4.81
4.87
5.04
14
1.30
1.60
1.89
2.05
2.17
15
WC turn. Ratio
5.77
6.01
6.04
6.06
6.07
16
1.61
2.27
2.73
2.95
3.10
17
GP margin ratio
20.30
19.83
19.82
19.79
19.79
18
NP margin ratio
8.19
11.70
13.63
14.66
14.54
19
9.69
10.05
10.72
11.29
12.14
20
(0.33) 8.97
17.94
24.17
27.66
21
Return on assets
(0.26) 6.31
12.44
16.77
19.32
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS
AND CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION
FINDINGS
1. Debt-equity ratio is marked by an increasing trend. The margin of
safety to the Company seems to be adequate.
2. Debt service coverage ratio is more in year 2008-2009 which is
affecting profitability of the firm.
3. Sales are more in year 2008-2009 compared to other years,
therefore it should be properly utilized (from Inventory turnover
ratio). Also investment in inventory in year 2009-2010 and year
2010-2011 shows that the firm is replenishing its stock in too many
small sizes.
4. The total assets turnover ratio for year 2008-2009 to year 20102011 shows the assets can be utilized more in these years. But as
this is new firm it is acceptable.
5. From gross profit margin ratio we can say that the valuation of
stock (closing or opening) is not efficient.
6. In year 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 the administration, selling and
distribution expenses are likely to be more as compared to other
years due to which the gross profit margin declines in those years.
Therefore it should be lowered as possible.
SUGGESTIONS
1. From proprietary ratio we can suggest that the firm should rely on
debt and own funds proportionately.
2. From debtors collection period we can suggest that in first year
2008-2009 the collection period should be lowered and should
maintain low turnover ratio.
3. Payment period is high in year 2008-2009 which can be lowered to
avail the benefits of delay.
4. Under-utilization of working capital is being done in year 20082009 which should be efficient.
CONCLUSION:
After completing this project titled Financial analysis it can be
concluded that:-
CHAPTER 6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bibliography: