Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
(Administrators Appointed)
ACN 120 394 194
Report by Administrators
20 January 2015
Contents
1
Executive summary.................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Appointment of Administrators ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Purpose of report ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Administrators recommendation ......................................................................................................... 1
Investigations ........................................................................................................................................... 14
5.1 Administrators investigations ............................................................................................................ 14
5.2 Overview of Administrators investigations ........................................................................................ 14
5.3 Approach to preliminary investigations ............................................................................................. 14
5.4 Offences under the Act by the directors ............................................................................................ 14
5.5 Potential recovery actions available to a liquidator ........................................................................... 15
5.6 Offences ............................................................................................................................................ 21
5.7 Limitation of investigations ................................................................................................................ 21
5.8 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 21
Page i
Page ii
Executive summary
1.1
Appointment of Administrators
We, Michael Brereton and Cliff Rocke, were appointed as Administrators of ILH Group Limited (the Company or
ILH) on 17 December 2014 pursuant to Section 436A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth) (the Act).
1.2
Purpose of report
The purpose of this report is to table the findings of our investigations of the Companys business, property,
affairs and financial circumstances, as well as our opinion on the various options available to creditors in
deciding the future of the Company at the Second Meeting of Creditors scheduled for 10:00am on
Wednesday, 28 January 2015.
1.3
Administrators recommendation
During the week ended 16 January 2015, the Administrators received a number of expressions of interest in
relation to restructuring ILH by way of a Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA). At this stage, none of the
proposals received are sufficiently progressed to a form such that they may be considered by creditors.
In accordance with Section 439A of the Act, it is the Administrators obligation to make a recommendation to
creditors on which option for the future of the Company is in the best interests of creditors. In this regard, the
Administrators are required to recommend one of following:
As the DOCA proposals received are at a preliminary stage, have not been thoroughly investigated by the
Administrators and are not in a form incapable of acceptance, the Administrators are unable to recommend
an option that is in the best interest of creditors at the date of this report.
We therefore consider it would be in creditors best interest to resolve to adjourn the Second Meeting
of Creditors for a period not exceeding 45 business days as it will, amongst other things allow:
Further time for interested parties to formulate and put forward a DOCA proposal to creditors and to
allow the Administrators further time to progress the potential restructure of the Company
The Administrators to report back to creditors with sufficient information to accurately determine whether
entering into a DOCA (if one capable of acceptance is received) provides a better return to creditors as
compared to an immediate winding up of the Company.
We note there is no certainty a DOCA proposal will be received which is capable of acceptance. However, in
our opinion, while there are costs associated with adjourning the Second Meeting of Creditors there is
potentially a substantial benefit to creditors from a DOCA that will only be possible if the meeting is
adjourned for a period not exceeding 45 business days.
If creditors elect at the Second Meeting of Creditors to adjourn the meeting, as recommended, the
Administrators will continue to seek expressions of interest for ILH, work with interested parties to develop
DOCA proposals capable of acceptance, and compile a supplementary report to creditors.
If the Second Meeting of Creditors is adjourned, the reconvened second meeting of creditors would
be held on or before Tuesday, 31 March 2015.
Page 1
Appointment of Administrators
2.1
Progress of Administration
Michael Brereton and Cliff Rocke were appointed as Administrators of on 17 December 2014 pursuant to
Section 436A of the Act.
The appointment was limited to ILH. ILH is the listed parent entity for eight subsidiaries (collectively the
Group). ILH held limited tangible assets and undertook minimal trading activity in its own right.
The subsidiaries of ILH, as listed in the table below, continued to operate for a short period of time on a
business as usual basis. This provided the opportunity for the Administrators to effect, where possible,
expeditious sales of the subsidiaries which were necessary to preserve and maximise value for creditors.
ILH subsidiaries
Trading subsidiaries 100% ownership
Rockwell Olivier (Perth) Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (ROP)
On appointment we assumed control of the Companys operations and assets, communicated with all key
stakeholders of the Company including principals and directors of the subsidiaries, employees and major
creditors, and implemented new controls for banking and other areas of critical risk.
It became quickly evident following our appointment that there would be insufficient funds available to
support the continuing operations of ILH, and its subsidiaries. There was limited cash available to the
Administrators, no future cash income and no ability to source funding to maintain operations.
The Administrators strategy was designed around this precarious situation and the need to maximise the
proceeds from asset sales, and to minimise ongoing costs so as to obtain the highest return possible for
creditors.
To minimise costs, all non-essential employees were made redundant shortly after our appointment.
It was critical to the Administrators strategy to complete the sale of individual legal practices as soon as
possible following the appointment due to:
The financial position of the subsidiaries, which could not continue operating indefinitely without support
from ILH
The need to ensure that sufficient cash was generated to meet on-going costs
The need to preserve value in the subsidiaries given the value resided in the clients, principals and staff,
all of whom had the ability to walk out the door.
Page 2
Based on the implementation of the asset sale strategy described above, the Administrators expect to realise
proceeds of approximately $4.5 million.
The expected proceeds from the sale of the ILHs assets will be insufficient to meet the debts owing to the
secured creditor or to employees. The secured debt as at the date of appointment was $15.3 million, and ILH
employee entitlements totalled approximately $0.2 million.
The secured creditor has a charge over all of the Group, excluding one dormant entity, and has the ability to
appoint a receiver and manager to each of these entities. We have entered into a deed of forbearance which
permits the secured creditor to appoint a receiver and manager to ILH at any time.
The secured creditor has had oversight of each of the sales completed by ILH, and or its subsidiaries, and
has reviewed and approved each of the sale agreements prior to providing its consent to the release of its
security over the assets being sold.
Given the shortfall to the secured creditor from the realisation of ILHs assets, if the Company is wound up
there will be no return to the unsecured creditors of ILH.
Negotiating the sale of ILHs six trading subsidiaries, in their entirety or in part, to achieve the highest return
for creditors has required extensive resources and has been the primary focus of the Administration. Further
detail on the ILH asset realisations is included at Section 4 of the report.
The other major tasks we have performed since our appointment include the following:
Communicating with principals, employees, customers and creditors
Attending to statutory and ASX notifications and lodgements
Liaising with and providing regular updates to the secured lender in respect of the conduct of the
Administration and proposed sale of the ILH subsidiaries
Calculating employee entitlements and the distribution of employee entitlement packs
Collecting books and records of ILH and completing a forensic backup of servers
Holding the first meeting of creditors of the Company
Undertaking preliminary investigations into the Company
Undertaking preliminary review of various expressions of interest in ILH and DOCA proposals.
Based on the significant amount of work that has been completed in the first five weeks of the
Administration, we believe that substantially all of the major issues have been identified and addressed. The
key remaining tasks for the Administration include a few minor asset realisations, and further exploration of
the expressions of interest and DOCA proposals put forward.
2.2
Object of Administration
Section 435A of the Act states that the objects of the Administration provisions of the Act are to provide for
the business, property and affairs of an insolvent company to be administered in a way that:
1.
Maximises the chance of the company, or as much as possible of its business, continuing in existence,
or
2.
If it is not possible for the company or its business to continue in existence, results in a better return for
the companys creditors and members than would result from an immediate winding up of the company.
This report has been prepared in accordance with Section 439A (4) of the Act.
This report has been prepared from information obtained from the Companys records, the directors and
management of the Company and from our own enquiries.
Our investigations into the Companys affairs have been limited due to the short time period provided under
the Act within which we must issue a report about the Companys business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances for the Second Meeting of Creditors.
Page 3
We have no reason to doubt the information contained in this report. The statements and opinions given in
this report are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements and opinions are not false or
misleading. Except where otherwise stated, we reserve the right to alter any conclusions reached on the
basis of any changed or additional information which may become available to us between the date of this
report and the date of the Second Meeting of Creditors.
Neither KordaMentha nor any member or employee thereof undertakes responsibility in any way whatsoever
to any person in respect of any errors in this report arising from incorrect information provided to us.
2.3
Our Declaration of Independence, Relevant Relationships and Indemnities (DIRRI), which was included
with the First Report to Creditors, is attached for your reference at Appendix 1. There has been no change to
the position since the DIRRI was first issued to creditors.
2.4
Section 436E of the Act requires us to conduct a meeting of the creditors of the Company in Administration
within eight business days of being appointed (the First Meeting of Creditors).
The First Meeting of Creditors for the Company was held on 31 December 2014.
At the First Meeting of Creditors, we advised that a Committee of Creditors may be formed for the Company
however due to the limited size and complexity of the Administration we were of the opinion that there was
limited benefit in a Committee of Creditors being formed. There was no proposal from the creditors present
at the meeting to appoint a Committee of Creditors for the Company.
A resolution was passed by the creditors present at the meeting not to appoint a Committee of Creditors.
2.5
We are required to convene a second meeting of creditors of the Company in Administration pursuant to
Section 439A of the Act (the Second Meeting of Creditors) to consider the future of the Company.
Before the Second Meeting of Creditors, we must prepare a report on the relevant Companys business,
property, affairs and financial circumstances and provide opinions on certain matters, which is the purpose of
this report. This allows creditors to be in a position to vote at the Second Meeting of Creditors on the options
available to them, as to whether it would be in the creditors interests for:
As discussed in Section 1 of the report, we consider it would be in creditors best interest to resolve to
adjourn the Second Meeting of Creditors for a period not exceeding 45 business days as it will, amongst
other things allow:
Further time for interested parties to formulate and put forward a DOCA proposal to creditors and to
allow the Administrators further time to progress the potential restructure of the Company
The Administrators to report back to creditors with sufficient information to accurately determine whether
entering into a DOCA (if one capable of acceptance is received) provides a better return to creditors as
compared to an immediate winding up of the Company.
Page 4
We advise that the Second Meeting of Creditors will be held at the offices of KordaMentha, Level 5
Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000, on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 10:00am.
Formal notice of the meeting is attached at Appendix 2. Registration for the meeting will commence
at 9:30am.
A Form 532 Appointment of Proxy also accompanies this report at Appendix 3. If you intend to appoint
another person to act on your behalf at the meeting, or you are a corporate creditor, you are required to
complete the Proxy Form appointing your representative. Proxy forms may be sent to KordaMentha, Level 5
Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000 or by facsimile addressed to Andrew Hudson
+61 2 8257 3099 or by email to ahudson@kordamentha.com no later than 4:00pm, Tuesday, 27 January 2015.
If you are representing a company, please ensure that your proxy is executed pursuant to Section 127 of the
Act or your representative is appointed pursuant to Section 250A of the Act, otherwise you will not be entitled
to vote at the meeting.
Creditors are required to have lodged proofs of debt no later than 4:00pm on Tuesday, 27 January 2015,
failing which they may be excluded from voting at the meeting. A Form 535, Formal Proof of Debt or Claim,
accompanies this report at Appendix 4. Proofs of Debt may be sent to KordaMentha, Level 5 Chifley Tower,
2 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000 or by facsimile addressed to Andrew Hudson +61 2 8257 3099 or by
email to ahudson@kordamentha.com.
Those creditors who have already lodged a Proof of Debt are not required to lodge a further proof
(unless they wish to amend their claim).
Arrangements have been made for creditors outside of Sydney to attend the meeting via conference call
facilities. Creditors intending to use the conference call facility are required to notify us of their intention and
collect conference call details at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
A copy of this report, together with other information relating to the Company, can be found on the
KordaMentha web site at www.kordamentha.com in the Creditor Information section.
2.6
Attached as Appendix 5 is a summary of the receipts and payments for the period 17 December 2014 to
16 January 2015. Further details in relation to the receipts and payments are available on request, provided
sufficient notice is given to comply with the request.
Page 5
Company background
3.1
ILH became a publicly listed company in August 2007 and was established as a vehicle under which various
professional services firms and related businesses could operate independently but service a national
network of clients.
The initial listed entity was Integrated Legal Holdings Ltd. In May 2013, the business was renamed
ILH Group Limited. At the time of listing, ILH consisted of three Perth based businesses - Talbot Olivier,
Brett Davies Lawyers and Law Central.
Talbot Olivier and Brett Davies Lawyers are legal practises located in Perth, with Law Central a
complementary online business that provides access to standard legal documentation through an online
platform. At the time of listing, ILH had annual revenues of approximately $10 million.
ILHs strategy since listing was to grow both organically and through acquisition of established practices. ILH
has acquired the following businesses and as a result developed a national footprint and a unique position in
the Pacific region:
ILH acquisitions
November 2008
Sydney
Legal Services
March 2009
Sydney
Legal Services
February 2011
Perth
Legal Services
July 2011
Legal Services
July 2012
Melbourne
Legal Services
September 2013
Sydney
In May 2013, the law firms of Talbot Olivier, Argyle Lawyers and Rockwell Bates combined to become the
national law firm Rockwell Olivier. Pacific Legal Network had been trading as Argyle Lawyers since
acquisition.
In May 2014, Eaton Capital Partners was sold, with shareholder approval given at the annual general
meeting, to Symon Capital Pty Ltd, as the business had not met the Board or managements performance
expectation since acquisition.
As at the date of our appointment, ILH had three complementary business units: Legal Services
(Rockwell Olivier), On-line legal services (Law Central), and Corporate Advisory and Wealth Management
(CIPL).
Rockwell Olivier provided a range of corporate and commercial legal services to companies and
businesses in Australia, across the Pacific region (Pacific Legal Network) and internationally, as well as
private client and personal legal services in the form of advice on superannuation, estate planning, family
law, trusts, taxation, property and employment (Argyle Private).
Law Central provided standard legal documents on the internet for use predominantly by accountants and
financial planners. Law Central also provided a legal information service as well as training and education
products.
CIPL provided advice to individuals and small businesses in areas including financial planning, life
insurance, and share trading and managed funds, and business consulting services.
Page 6
3.2
Detailed below is information regarding the Company as included in a company search obtained from the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as at the date of our appointment.
Company details
Date of incorporation
Company type
Registered office
Principal place of business
3.3
27 June 2006
Australian Public Company
Level 22, 1 Market Street, Sydney, NSW 2000
Level 22, 1 Market Street, Sydney, NSW 2000
Company shareholders
Detailed below is a summary of the 20 largest shareholders as per the Companys register of members. The
Companys records indicate there were 167 million shares on issue to 920 shareholders. In total the top 20
shareholders represented approximately 49% of the shares on issue by the Company.
Shareholder name
Class of share
Fully paid up
13,710,281
7,823,673
7,412,821
6,038,405
5,312,031
4,869,313
4,567,669
3,105,392
3,105,392
3,105,392
3,068,340
2,724,996
2,607,711
2,536,428
2,259,913
2,191,672
2,119,812
2,055,000
2,028,782
2,000,349
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
167,611,336
Ordinary
Yes
3.4
Security interests
Detailed below is information regarding the Company obtained from a search of the Personal Properties
Securities Register (PPSR) as at the date of appointment.
Security interests
Westpac Banking Corporation Limited
Registered
30 Jan 2012
201201190088602
Collateral class
All Pap No Except
Westpac Banking Corporation Limited (Westpac) has a registered security interest over the Company and
the majority of its subsidiaries. At the time of appointment the amount due to Westpac was $15.3 million.
3.5
Company directors
Detailed below is information regarding the directors of the Company obtained from ASIC as at the date of
our appointment. Included in this list are details of past directors whose appointment ended within 12 months
of our appointment (collectively the directors).
Page 7
Director name
Appointment date
Cessation date
01-Dec-14
01-Oct-14
01-Oct-14
25-Apr-08
06-Oct-06
06-Oct-06
26-Sep-13
N/A
N/A
N/A
01-Dec-14
01-Oct-14
01-Oct-14
15-Aug-14
3.6
Company secretaries
Detailed below is information regarding the secretaries of the Company obtained from ASIC as at the date of
our appointment. Included in this list are details of past secretaries whose appointment ended within
12 months of our appointment.
Secretary name
Appointment date
Cessation date
Reena Minhas
Jean-Marie Rudd
01-Sep-14
28-Aug-08
N/A
01-Sep-14
3.7
Related entities
A diagram showing the corporate structure including the Company and its subsidiaries is provided at Appendix 6.
Detailed below is a summary of related entities of the Company, who are also debtors or creditors of the
Company. The amounts owed to or owing by these related entities arose in the ordinary course of business
via the intercompany loan accounts maintained by ILH.
Related entity
Nature of claim
Debtor/Creditor
Amount
Intercompany loan
Debtor
11,967,425
Intercompany loan
Debtor
4,891,912
Intercompany loan
Debtor
2,275,933
Total
19,135,270
Related entity
Nature of claim
Debtor/Creditor
Amount
Intercompany loan
Creditor
11,156
Intercompany loan
Creditor
100,214
Capricorn Investment
Intercompany loan
Creditor
3,053,198
Total
3,164,568
The above creditor claims have not yet been adjudicated. However, if the Company is placed in liquidation
and there are sufficient funds realised for the liquidators to make a distribution to creditors, the related
entities will each be required to provide a Proof a Debt, which will then be adjudicated.
No return from the intercompany debtor position is expected.
Page 8
3.8
The officers of the ILH have provided the following explanation of the events leading up to the appointment
of Voluntary Administrators:
In September 2013, ILH acquired the shares in CIPL, and the business and assets of The Pentad
Group which comprised Eaton Capital Partners, for consideration of $9.2 million. The consideration
comprised $4.5 million cash and 52.7 million ILH shares with a market value of $0.09 per share, with an
additional contingent consideration of $5.0 million payable over a two year period in scrip and cash if
certain performance conditions were satisfied. This acquisition required ILH to increase its external
borrowings by $4.0 million resulting in total external debt for ILH of approximately $14.0 million.
On 31 December 2013, ILH breached its bank funding interest cover ratio (ICR). This breach was not
rectified until September 2014, when the secured lender agreed to reduce the ICR covenant on the
condition ILH would make certain debt repayments. The first repayment was due on 4 December 2014.
In FY14, ILH incurred one-off acquisition related costs of $1.4 million relating to the CIPL purchase and
a potential international acquisition. The international acquisition was ultimately unsuccessful.
ILHs legal practice significantly underperformed against forecast, in particular the Perth practice, which
recorded a loss before tax of $3.9 million. This was primarily due to the decline in revenue following the
loss of several senior legal professionals and a downturn in economic conditions in Western Australia.
In addition, Eaton Capital Partners significantly underperformed expectations recording a loss of
$447,000 in the year ended 30 June 2014.
On 15 August 2014, ILH announced the sale of the Eaton Capital Partners due to the business not
meeting the Boards expectations.
Between September 2014 and November 2014, the legal practice continued to underperform in
comparison to forecast raising concerns about the overall financial stability of ILH and its subsidiaries.
On 1 October 2014, long standing Board members John Dawkins and Anne Tregonning resigned and
were replace by Matthew Driscoll, an independent director, and David French, Managing Director of
CIPL.
On 1 December 2014, Graeme Fowler resigned as ILH Director and CEO. Owen Evans, a director of
CIPL, replaced Mr Fowler on the Board and David French was appointed CEO.
On 3 December 2014, the ILH Board of directors appointed 333 Capital (an affiliate of KordaMentha) to
assist with the Boards review and implementation of a strategic plan for ILH and its subsidiaries.
As part of the strategic plan the Board sought to divest ROP as a result of the significant deterioration in
business performance. The divestment of ROP, however, was not feasible due to ROPs long term
lease commitment, which was no longer considered commercial, as it was guaranteed by ILH.
In addition, ILH and the majority of its subsidiaries were subject to a Deed of Cross Guarantee which
hindered the divestment of any of the underperforming subsidiaries.
On 4 December 2014, ILH was unable to make a debt repayment to the secured lender of $250,000.
In early December 2014, the Board determined that ILH required $0.5 million of additional funding to
enable ILH and its subsidiaries to operate through to the end of January 2015.
By the 16 December 2014, the Board had exhausted all funding avenues, and as a result, on
17 December 2014 the ILH Board resolved to place ILH into administration.
The officers of ILH have advised the financial position for ILH and its subsidiaries can be attributed to:
A failure to fully integrate the subsidiaries and no attainment of economies of scale
A focus on acquisitions rather than performance improvement, organic growth and integration of the
acquired businesses
Significant corporate overheads and duplication of corporate and support functions across each of the
subsidiaries
Significant deterioration of performance in the legal services subsidiaries against budget in FY14
Page 9
The loss of a number of senior legal professionals in the Perth legal practice and the coinciding
downturn in the Western Australian economy
Limited financial and operating controls in relation to debtors, resulting in ad-hoc collections and
substantial provisioning requirements
Deterioration in working capital and insufficient reserves to trade through the Christmas holiday period.
The Administrators generally concur with the above assertions made by the officers of the Company, and
also note ILH appears to have overpaid on the acquisition of some of its subsidiaries given the consideration
paid and the subsequent earnings achieved.
3.9
The Group (excluding Rockwell Olivier Pty Ltd) (the ILH Cross Guarantee Group) entered into a Deed of
Cross Guarantee which was registered with ASIC on or about 30 June 2008 (the Cross Guarantee).
The Cross Guarantee provides that each member of the ILH Cross Guarantee Group (Cross Guarantee
Group Entity) guarantees the debt of each other Cross Guarantee Group Entity One of the circumstances
where this guarantee becomes enforceable is on a creditors voluntary winding up under Part 5.5 Division 3
of the Act. This means that currently, each Cross Guarantee Group Entity is responsible for the debts of
each other Cross Guarantee Group Entity, and a creditor of a Cross Guarantee Group Entity is a creditor of
every other Cross Guarantee Group Entity.
Estimated realisable
value
36,201,274
5,308,317
35,289,415
5,308,317
(54,343)
(54,343)
(13,399,098)
(13,399,098)
(316,087)
Page 10
Book or cost
valuation
Estimated
realisable value
16,071,931
102,879
95
95
5,343
5,343
Other assets
20,123,905
5,200,000
36,201,274
5,308,317
We note the directors RATA supports the position that the Company was effectively an ultimate holding
company with limited tangible assets and minimal trading activity in its own right. Substantially all of the
assets and trading activity occurred in the subsidiary entities.
A review of the intercompany loans from ILH to its subsidiaries appear to be significantly overstated as
goodwill on the acquisition for several of the subsidiaries has been erroneously recorded in the loan
accounts.
Other assets primarily comprise of the investment in its subsidiaries, in particular CIPL, which had a book
value of $13.6 million.
In our view the Estimated Realisable Value of the assets is a reasonable estimate.
Page 11
Realisations of assets
ILH ceased to trade on appointment of Administrators. Accordingly, since our appointment we have focussed
extensively on asset realisations. This has primarily involved the sale of ILHs shares in the subsidiaries and
or assisting the facilitation of the sale of the business assets to the principals in each of the subsidiaries.
The principals of the subsidiaries are the natural buyers of their practices, and should attribute a higher value
to their practices than an external party. In this regard, following our appointment we met with the majority of
the subsidiary principals to negotiate sales of their businesses. The offers received were considered by the
secured lender.
The secured creditor has a charge over all of ILHs trading subsidiaries, and accordingly is required to
provide its consent to release its security over the assets being sold. Accordingly, the secured creditor has
had oversight of each of the sales completed by ILH, and or its subsidiaries, and has reviewed and approved
each of the sale agreements.
The Administrators of ILH expect to receive proceeds of approximately $4.5 million through the asset
realisation strategy. Several sales for certain business asset have been negotiated at the subsidiary level.
The proceeds from these sales will be for the benefit of the subsidiarys employee entitlements or the
secured lender.
The expected proceeds from the sale of the ILHs assets will be insufficient to meet the debts owing to the
secured creditor or to the ILH employees. The secured debt as at the date of appointment was $15.3 million,
and ILH employee entitlements totalled approximately $0.2 million.
4.1
Realisations summary
($000)
133
Asset Realisations
CIPL sale of shares and business assets
3,500
1,025
4,658
4.2
Page 12
Page 13
Investigations
5.1
Administrators investigations
Under the Act, we are required to investigate the Companys business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances.
Pursuant to Regulation 5.3A.02 of the Act, we are also required to investigate and report to creditors on any
possible recovery actions that would be available to a liquidator, if creditors resolve to place the Company
into liquidation. However, we note we currently have limited funds available to us, which would not extend to
pursuing any such actions in the capacity as liquidator, and have incurred costs in acting as Administrators
which would rank in priority to any creditors claims in a liquidation.
Our investigations are at a preliminary stage and we are not in a position to provide any final comments
about potential offences that may have been committed or amounts of money that may be recoverable in the
event of the Company being placed into liquidation. It should be noted that further investigations would need
to be undertaken by a liquidator (if appointed), and independent legal advice sought in order to determine the
likely success of any actions contemplated in respect to the matters detailed below.
5.2
Breaches of duty and other offences under the Act by the directors
5.3
Analysed and where required, maintained the integrity and security of the IT systems of the Company.
We were required to take immediate steps to stop any intrusions into the Companys IT systems.
Identified, reviewed, reconstructed where required, and analysed financial information in both hard copy
and electronic form
Undertook searches of various publicly available databases, including ASIC, ASX and Office of State
Revenue records
Spoke with various external parties, including service suppliers of the Company.
5.4
Section 438D of the Act requires an Administrator to lodge a report with ASIC if it appears that:
A past or present officer, or member, of the Company may have been guilty of an offence in relation to
the Company, or
A person who has taken part in the formation promotion, Administration, management or winding up of
the Company may have misapplied money or property of the Company or may have been guilty of
negligence, default, breach of duty or trust in relation to the Company.
We set out below and our comments as to whether investigations are warranted in relation to particular
offences.
Page 14
To act honestly
From our investigations to date, we have not found any evidence the directors have breached their duty to
act with due care and diligence and to act in good faith, nor have they used their position improperly or used
information improperly.
5.5
Page 15
Uncommercial transactions
A transaction of a company is an uncommercial transaction if the following elements are established by a
liquidator:
The transaction was entered into or given effect to within two (2) years of the date of appointment of the
Administrator
At the time the transaction was entered into, or when given effect to, the Company was insolvent or
became insolvent as a result of the transaction
A reasonable person in the Companys circumstances would not have entered into the transaction
having regard to the benefits and detriments to the Company in entering into the transaction and the
respective benefits to other parties.
The defences available to a party involved in an uncommercial transaction claim are, in effect, the same as
those for an unfair preference.
From our investigations to date we are unaware of any uncommercial transactions entered into by the
Company. However, further investigations will be conducted if we are appointed liquidators to the Company.
Unfair loans
Essentially an unfair loan is a loan agreement where the interest or charges are considered to be
extortionate. Unfair loans made to the Company any time prior to the appointment of the Administrators may
potentially be overturned by a subsequently appointed liquidator, whether or not the Company was insolvent
at any time after the loan was entered into.
From our investigations, we are not aware of any unfair loans entered into by the Company. However, further
investigations will be conducted if we are appointed liquidators to the Company.
At the time the debt was incurred the directors had reasonable grounds to expect and did expect that
the Company was solvent and would remain solvent if it incurred that debt and any other debts that it
had incurred at that time.
At the time the debt was incurred the directors had reasonable grounds to believe and did believe that a
competent and reliable person was responsible for providing information about the Company's solvency
and that person was fulfilling that responsibility.
The directors through illness or some other good reason were not taking part in the management of the
Company at the time the debt was incurred.
The directors took all reasonable steps to prevent the Company from incurring the debt.
It is crucial to note that, with the exception of unfair loans, in order for a liquidator to be able to set aside a
transaction or obtain compensation from a director for insolvent trading, the liquidator must first be able to
show that at a relevant point in time the Company was insolvent.
Page 16
The Act states the Company is considered to be solvent if, and only if, the Company is able to pay its debts
as and when they become due and payable. A Company that is not solvent is insolvent.
The Courts have tended to use a cash flow test rather than a balance sheet test for determining insolvency,
however the determination of solvency involves a consideration of the Companys financial position in its
entirety and in the context of commercial reality. A temporary lack of liquidity will not necessary mean that a
company is insolvent. Such a situation is to be contrasted with an endemic shortage of working capital.
Results of investigations
In relation to our investigations into the financial affairs of the Company it should be noted that the Company
did not trade in its own right, rather trading was conducted by the subsidiaries. Our analysis, except where
otherwise stipulated is based upon the financial performance of the Group as presented in its consolidated
accounts.
The Groups annual financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis and accordingly, all commentary
in respect of the Groups financials are reported on such basis. We understand monthly balance sheets for
the individual subsidiaries of the Group were prepared on an individual basis, excluding shared head office
costs, which were either accounted for separately or were recorded in the accounts of the Group.
The financial analysis below has been undertaken from the Groups annual financial statements, which were
audited by the Groups auditor Ernst and Young (EY). Where financial information is not derived from the
annual financial statements, the various sources of financial information including managements monthly
financial accounts and ledgers have been clearly marked.
In respect of the Group, at the time of writing, an exact date of insolvency has not been determined, however
we make the following comments in respect of the solvency of the Group.
Financial ratios
We have reviewed the current ratio and net assets for the Group from its end of year accounts for the three
years ending 30 June 2011, 2012 and 2013.
Financial year ended
30-Jun-2012
Current ratio
Net assets ($000)
Current assets less current liabilities ($000)
30-Jun-2013
30-Jun-2014
0.90
0.80
0.40
19,062
19,958
14,577
8,325
10,089
(10,547)
Working capital is a critical element of an organisation and sufficiency of working capital is often closely
associated with solvency. A key measure of working capital is the current ratio which is the ratio of current
assets to current liabilities. A current ratio of greater than one would generally indicate the company has a
surplus of short term assets to short term liabilities.
We note in the above analysis the current ratio was lower than one at every point in time reviewed. This
means the Group has historically traded with a deficiency of working capital.
As at 30 June 2014, there was a significant decline in the current ratio. This was attributable to the
reclassification of the Groups bank debt to due and payable under the terms of the funding facility as a result
of a breach of the ICR covenant on the facility as at 30 June 2014. This breach was rectified in
September 2014, following the secured lenders agreement to reduce the ICR covenant on the condition ILH
would make certain debt repayments. Accordingly, by 30 September 2014 the Groups borrowings were no
longer classified as current.
Page 17
Current ratio
Net assets ($000)
Current assets less current liabilities ($000)
31-Aug-14
30-Sep-14
31-Oct-14
30-Nov-14
0.53
1.03
1.01
1.12
14,786
13,985
14,771
16,906
(10,243)
302
154
1,077
Management has advised that the improvement in the current ratio and net assets in November 2014 was
related to the conversion of the $1.5 million cash liability payable to CIPL into ILH shares, as approved at the
AGM in November 2014.
Cash flow analysis
We have reviewed the consolidated cash flows for the Group from its audited end of year accounts for the
three years ending 30 June 2012, 2013 and 2014. These are summarised below:
Financial year ended
30-Jun-2012
($000)
30-Jun-2013
($000)
30-Jun-2014
($000)
(1,338)
(18)
(966)
(2,082)
(2,766)
(4,716)
2,264
2,635
4,000
(1,156)
(149)
(1,681)
ILH has recorded a net cash flow shortfall in each of the past three financial years. This cash flow
shortfall has been support by cash reserves.
The net cash flow shortfall is principally attributable net cash operating outflows, indicating the
consolidated Group was loss making over these three years.
The investing activities for ILH have been funded by equivalent increases in external borrowings.
Page 18
Profitability
The Groups profit and loss statements for the three financial years ending 30 June 2012, 2013 and 2014 is
summarised below:
Profit and loss statement for the years ending 30 June 2014
Continuing operations
Revenue
Other income
Occupancy expenses
Salaries and employee benefits expenses
Depreciation and amortisation expenses
Advertising and marketing expenses
Administrative expenses
Other expenses
Finance costs
Share based payments expense
Profit (Loss) before tax from continuing operations
Income tax benefit / (expense)
Profit (Loss) for the year from continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Profit/(loss) after tax for the year from discontinued operations
Net profit/(loss) for the year
Other comprehensive income/(loses) for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year
2012
($'000)
2013
($'000)
2014
($'000)
31,690
717
(2,815)
(22,325)
(530)
(460)
(3,630)
(836)
(351)
(42)
1,419
(303)
1,116
1,116
(1)
1,115
31,719
590
(2,812)
(21,642)
(610)
(577)
(4,112)
(667)
(523)
(37)
1,330
(309)
1,021
1,021
1
1,022
27,476
782
(3,023)
(22,346)
(715)
(531)
(5,174)
(1,962)
(1,102)
(29)
(6,625)
2,129
(4,496)
(4,459)
(8,955)
2
(8,953)
As explained in the audited financial report for year ended 30 June 2014, the reduction in revenue of
$4.2 million was primarily due to the underperformance of the legal practices, in particular Perth, one off
acquisition costs and the newly acquired corporate advisory arm of CIPL, Eaton Capital Partners, not
meeting Board expectations. Excluding the revenues achieved by the newly acquired wealth management
arm of CIPL, the comparable year on year reduction equates to $7.6 million.
In addition to the decline in revenue, ILH experienced an increase in corporate overhead expenses and
finance costs.
Furthermore, between year ended 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2014 there was an increase in the bad and
doubtful debts of $1.1 million.
Losses from continuing operations (before tax) in the year ending 30 June 2014 totalled $6.6 million, an
increase of $7.9 million from year ended 30 June 2013.
Page 19
Sep-2014
Oct-2014
Nov-2014
($000)
($000)
($000)
($000)
2,300
2,409
2,167
1,824
13
13
305
357
343
421
Total revenue
2,610
2,779
2,516
2,258
1,005
1,554
1,322
1,141
1,605
1,226
1,194
1,116
18
35
24
1,545
959
1,228
1,374
Operating EBITDA
78
301
(31)
(234)
55
134
(173)
(408)
From a month on month review of the consolidated management accounts, revenue and earnings softened
towards the end of the 2014 calendar year, which is typical in a service based business.
In the two months prior to our appointment the Group experienced net after tax losses of $0.2 million
(October 2014) and $0.4 million (November 2014).
Auditors comments regarding going concern
The Group engaged EY as its auditor for the years 2010 to 2014.
We note that potential risks to the going concern of the Group were identified in the notes to the financial
statements for the 2014 financial year and comments were included in the Independent Auditors report
dated 30 September 2014 as follows:
Emphasis of Matter
Without qualifying our audit opinion expressed above, attention is drawn to the following matter. The
conditions described in Note 2a Basis of Preparation - Going Concern, indicate the existence of a material
uncertainty that may cause significant doubt about the consolidated entitys ability to continue as a going
concern and therefore the consolidated entity may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities
in the normal course of business.
Causes of the failure of the Company
The officers of the ILH have advised the financial position for ILH and its subsidiaries can be attributed to:
A failure to fully integrate the subsidiaries and no attainment of economies of scale
A focus on acquisitions rather than the performance improvement, organic growth and integration of the
acquired businesses
Significant corporate overheads and duplication of corporate and support functions across each of the
subsidiaries
Significant deterioration of performance in the legal service subsidiaries against budget in FY14
The loss of a number of senior legal professionals in ROP and the coinciding downturn in the Perth
economy
Limited financial and operating controls in relation to debtors, resulting in ad-hoc collections and
substantial provisioning requirements
Page 20
Insufficient working capital reserves to trade through the Christmas holiday period.
In the event we are appointed as liquidators of the Company, detailed investigations will be undertaken to
determine a date of insolvency and whether any action for insolvent trading against the directors will be
pursued.
Any claim for insolvent trading against the directors of the Group would need to be assessed on commercial
grounds including:
Likelihood that pursuing a claim of insolvent trading would be successful, taking into account the
defences available to the directors
Cost of litigation
Further, and as stated above, the Act provides directors with a number of defences to a claim for
insolvent trading.
5.5.3 Costs
The costs of pursuing voidable transactions and insolvent trading would be met out of the assets of the
Company or funding from creditors of the Company. Alternatively, the liquidators could seek litigation
insurance funding.
5.6 Offences
Our investigations to date do not reveal that the directors have committed any offences prior to our
appointment. However, our investigations are incomplete and ongoing and in the event that creditors
resolve that the Company be wound up, further extensive investigations will be completed.
The details of the Groups assets and liabilities as established by our office
5.8 Conclusion
We are not aware of any serious offences in relation to the Company that may have been committed by the
directors of the Company. We are not aware of any persons, who have taken part in the formation or
management of the Company, misapplying or retaining money or property of the Company. We are not
aware of any persons who have been guilty of negligence, breach of duty or trust of the Company.
Accordingly, we have not reported to the ASIC under Section 438D of the Act.
However, we have concerns regarding the collectability of the Group debtor book, and whether the Group
debtor position was in fact overstated. Given the accounts have recently been issued and audited this may
give rise to a potential claim against the auditors and or directors. This will be further investigated in any
liquidation of the Company.
Page 21
6.1
It is our obligation to make a recommendation to creditors on which alternative is in the best interests of
creditors. We make the following general comments in respect to each option:
The moratorium available under the Voluntary Administration process will cease
2.
The liquidators will be empowered to recover potential voidable transactions, as outlined in Section 5.5
of this report
3.
The liquidators will be required to conduct an investigation into the affairs of the Company pursuant to
Section 533 of the Act and lodge a report with the ASIC in respect of the same.
It is clear at this stage the Company has a deficiency of assets to liabilities and further that it is now
insolvent, in that it cannot meet its debts as and when they fall due.
If the Company is placed into liquidation, employees (other than excluded employees) may be eligible for
payment of their outstanding employee entitlements (excluding unpaid superannuation) under Fair
Entitlements Guarantee (FEG), a scheme operated by the Federal Government.
Given the shortfall to the secured creditor from the realisation of ILHs assets, and the outstanding employee
entitlements, if the Company is wound up there will be no return to the unsecured creditors of ILH.
Page 22
Further time for interested parties to formulate and put forward a DOCA proposal to creditors and to
allow the Administrators further time to progress the potential restructure of the Company
The Administrators to report back to creditors with sufficient information to accurately determine whether
entering into a DOCA (if one capable of acceptance is received) provides a better return to creditors as
compared to an immediate winding up of the Company.
We note there is no certainty a DOCA proposal will be received which is capable of acceptance. However, in
our opinion, while there are costs associated with adjourning the Second Meeting of Creditors there is
potentially a substantial benefit to creditors from a DOCA that will only be possible if the meeting is
adjourned for a period not exceeding 45 business days.
If creditors elect at the Second Meeting of Creditors to adjourn the meeting, as recommended, the
Administrators will continue to seek expressions of interest for ILH, work with interested parties to develop
DOCA proposals capable of acceptance, and compile a supplementary report to creditors.
If the Second Meeting of Creditors is adjourned, the reconvened second meeting of creditors would
be held on or before Tuesday, 31 March 2015.
Given the quantum of amounts owing to employees for entitlements and the secured creditor under its
registered interests, the Administrators do not anticipate a dividend being paid to unsecured creditors if the
Company is placed into liquidation due to:
There being minimal assets available for realisation within the Company
We are unable to advise at this time what the estimated return to creditors will be under a DOCA proposal as
we have not received a proposal capable of acceptance by creditors.
In accordance with Section 449E of the Act, the Administrators remuneration report is attached as
Appendix 8. We are seeking approval of our remuneration on a time basis in accordance with the
KordaMentha Sydney 2015 Schedules of Hourly Rates, which are included in the remuneration report. Also
included in the remuneration report are details in relation to disbursements.
Page 23
Further information
Creditors requiring further information regarding the Administration can contact Andrew Hudson on
(02) 8257 3023.
Dated: 20 January 2015
Michael Brereton
Administrator
Cliff Rocke
Administrator
Page 24
Relationships, including:
any relationships with the Company and others within the previous 24 months
any prior professional services provided to the Company within the previous 24 months
This declaration is made in respect of us, Michael Brereton and Cliff Rocke, our partners and the
KordaMentha Group.
Independence
We, Michael Brereton and Cliff Rocke of KordaMentha, Level 5, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000, have
undertaken a proper assessment of the risks to our independence prior to accepting the appointment as
Voluntary Administrators of the Company in accordance with the law and applicable professional standards.
This assessment identified no real or potential risks to our independence. We are not aware of any reasons
that would preclude us from accepting this appointment.
Declaration of relationships
Circumstances of appointment
Michael Brereton, one of the administrators, and members of our team, met with and had a number of calls
with David French (Company Director) and Reena Minhas (Company Chief Financial Officer) to prepare for
and plan for a voluntary administration appointment on 17 December 2014, which culminated in the
appointment as voluntary administrators later that evening. The purpose of the meetings on
17 December 2014 were to clarify and explain the nature and consequences for the Company and its
subsidiaries of an insolvency appointment and to provide consents to act.
We did not receive any remuneration in relation to this advice.
In our opinion, these meetings do not affect our independence for the following reasons:
The Courts and the ARITA Code of Professional Practice specifically recognise the need for
practitioners and their staff to provide advice to companies and the options available and do not
consider that such advice results in a conflict or is an impediment to accepting the appointment.
The nature of the advice provided to the Company is such that it would not be subject to review and
challenge during the course of the voluntary administration
The pre-appointment meeting will not influence our ability to be able to fully comply with statutory and
fiduciary obligations associated with the voluntary administration of the Company in an objective and
impartial manner.
Relevant relationships
We, or a member or an associate of KordaMentha, have or have had over the preceding 24 months a
relationship with the following parties:
Secured Creditors
St. George Bank Limited and/or Westpac Banking Corporation Limited provided financial services to the
Company.
Nature of the relationship
KordaMentha has had relationships with the above secured creditor, due to the nature of KordaMenthas
business. This includes business advisory, consulting services and the appointment of KordaMenthas
registered liquidators to companies as a formal insolvency appointment (in some cases by the secured
creditor), where the secured creditor has provided banking facilities, loan facilities and/or leasing facilities to
insolvent companies.
Reasons why not an impediment or conflict
In our opinion, this relationship does not result in a conflict of interest or duty as KordaMentha has never
undertaken any work for the above secured creditor in respect of the Company. This relationship has not
impeded our independence.
Australian Taxation Office (ATO)
Nature of the relationship
KordaMentha undertakes work from time to time on behalf of the ATO and is on a panel of practitioners
maintained by the ATO. This includes the appointment of KordaMenthas registered liquidators to companies
as a formal appointment where the ATO has asked us to consent to act as liquidators.
Reasons why not an impediment or conflict
In our opinion, this relationship does not result in a conflict of interest or duty as we have not identified any
issue in relation to this relationship that would give rise to a conflict in undertaking the administration of the
Company. This relationship has not impeded our independence.
The nature of the report provided to ILH is such that it would not be subject to review and challenge
during the course of the voluntary administration and any subsequent liquidation. The strategic review
engagement will not influence our ability to fully comply with the statutory and fiduciary obligations
associated with the voluntary administration and any subsequent liquidation of the Company in an
objective and impartial manner.
Indemnities
We have not been indemnified in relation to this voluntary administration, other than any indemnities that we
may be entitled to under statute.
Upfront payments
We have not been provided with any upfront payments in relation to this voluntary administration.
General
As required under the ARITA Code of Professional Practice, if circumstances change, or new information is
identified, we will update this declaration and provide a copy to creditors with our next communication as well
as table a copy of any replacement declaration at the next meeting of the creditors of the Company.
Dated: 19 December 2014
Michael Brereton
Voluntary Administrator
Cliff Rocke
Voluntary Administrator
Annexure A
333 Capital met with ILH directors prior to our appointment, as follows:
Mr Paul Spottiswood, an Executive Director of 333 Capital was approached by Mr Driscoll, the
Chairman of ILH in early November 2014, to provide strategic advice to ILH. Mr Driscoll had been
known to Paul for a number of years, but had no previous professional relationship.
333 Capital, met David French, Managing Director of ILH on 13 November 2014 to discuss ILH.
333 Capital was appointed by the board of ILH to act as financial adviser to ILH, which involved a
strategic review of ILH. The mandate also contemplated assets to be sold as part of the review and a
possible subsequent capital raising.
The mandate was agreed and signed as at 1 December 2014, and work on the strategic review
commenced following an introductory meeting on 4 December 2014.
Since 4 December 2014, 333 Capital have had eight (8) meetings with ILH board members and a
number of short phone calls with specific board members.
Paragraph 5.6.12(2)(a)
Form 529
Corporations Act 2001
Notice of Second Meeting of Creditors of Company under Administration
ILH Group Limited (Administrators Appointed)
ACN 120 394 194 (the Company)
Notice is hereby given that the Second Meeting of Creditors of the Company will be held on
Wednesday 28 January 2015 at Level 5 Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000. Registration for
all creditors and employees will open at 9:30am with the meeting commencing at 10:00am.
Agenda
1.
To review the Administrators report in connection with the business, property, affairs and financial
circumstances of the Company
b.
To consider the approval of the Administrators remuneration calculated in accordance with rates
charged by KordaMentha for the period of the voluntary administration up to the Second Meeting of
Creditors
c.
That the Second Meeting of Creditors be adjourned for a period of no longer than 45 business
days, or
ii.
iii.
2.
If the creditors of the Company resolve that the Company is to be wound up or the Administration
should end, to consider the approval of the Administrators remuneration from the Second Meeting of
Creditors to completion of the Voluntary Administration
3.
4.
i.
To consider the approval of the Liquidators remuneration calculated in accordance with rates
charged by KordaMentha for the period of the Liquidation
ii.
To consider authorising the Liquidators to compromise debts of the Company under Section
477(2A) of the Corporations Act 2001
iii.
To consider authorising the Liquidators to enter into agreements that may take longer than
three months to complete under Section 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001
iv.
To consider authorising, subject to obtaining approval from the Australian Investment and
Securities Commission, pursuant to Section 542(4) of the Corporations Act 2001, the books
and records of the Company be disposed of by the Liquidators six months after the dissolution
of the Company
v.
Creditors wishing to vote at the meeting, who will not be attending in person or are a company, must
complete and return a Proxy Form by no later than 4.00pm on the last business day prior to the meeting, by
post to KordaMentha, GPO Box 2523, Sydney NSW 2001 or by facsimile on (02) 8257 3099. A Form 532 of
Proxy Appointment is attached.
Dated: 20 January 2015
Michael Brereton
Administrator
Appointment of Proxy
Form 532
Regulation 5.6.29
Corporations Act 2001
Given name
Surname
Company name
Telephone number
Address
2.
of .....................................................................................
For
Against
Abstain
General
Proxy to
Vote
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Signature Section (in accordance with Sections 127 or 250D of the Corporations Act 2001)
Signature of individual or person authorised by corporate
resolution to represent corporation
Print Name
Director
Dated ......................................................................
Director/Company Secretary
Certificate of Witness
Please Note: This certificate is to be completed only where the person giving the proxy is blind or incapable
of writing. The signature of the creditor is not to be attested by the person nominated as proxy.
I, ........................................................................ of .........................................................................................
certify that the above instrument appointing a proxy was completed by me in the presence of and at the
request of the person appointing the proxy and read to him before he attached his signature or mark to the
instrument.
Signature of witness: ..........................................................................................................................................
Subregulation 5.6.49(2)
Form 535
Corporations Act 2001
ILH Group Limited (Administrators Appointed)
ACN 120 394 194 (the Company)
Formal Proof of Debt or Claim (General Form)
To: The Administrators of ILH Group Limited (Administrators Appointed)
1.
This is to state that the Company was on 17 December 2014, and still is, justly and truly indebted:
To ...............................................................................................................................................................
(name of creditor)
Of
...............................................................................................................................................................
(address of creditor)
For ...............................................................................................................................................................
(amount owed to creditor)
Consideration
Amount ($)
Remarks
(GST inclusive)
2.
To my knowledge or belief the creditor has not, nor has any person by the creditor's order, had or
received any satisfaction or security for the sum or any part of it except for the following: (insert
particulars of all securities held. If the securities are on the property of the Company, assess the value
of those securities. If any bills or other negotiable securities are held, show them in a schedule in the
following form).
Date
Drawer
Acceptor
Amount ($ )
Due date
*I am employed by the creditor and authorised in writing by the creditor to make this statement. I know that
the debt was incurred for the consideration stated and that the debt, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
remains unpaid and unsatisfied.
*I am the creditor's agent authorised in writing to make this statement in writing. I know that the debt was
incurred for the consideration stated and that the debt, to the best of my knowledge and belief, remains
unpaid and unsatisfied.
* Delete if not applicable.
Dated this
.......................................................................................................................................................
Signature
.......................................................................................................................................................
Name
.......................................................................................................................................................
Address
.......................................................................................................................................................
Phone:
.......................................................................................................................................................
I nominate to receive electronic notification of notices or documents in accordance with Section 600G of
the Corporations Act at the following email address or fax number:
Email address: ....................................................................................................................................................
Fax number:
....................................................................................................................................................
Payments
Balance
Opening Balance
Date
17/12/2014
22/12/2014
133,362
133,362
Interest received
31/12/2014
90
133,451
31/12/2014
(11)
133,440
Mail re-direction
09/01/2015
(187)
133,254
15/01/2015
14,925
148,179
15/01/2015
16/01/2015
16/01/2015
35,075
104,000.00
(8,496.26)
183,254
287,254
278,758
Closing Balance
18/01/2015
278,758
2013
($'000)
1,312
10,789
2,288
31
14,421
1,343
14,590
168
3
16,103
30,524
3,941
676
1,074
404
6,096
4,794
348
107
118
5,367
11,462
19,062
2013
($'000)
1,164
10,749
126
2,929
228
15,196
2,861
983
14,590
666
4
19,105
34,301
3,379
623
991
114
5,107
8,375
388
310
162
9,235
14,342
19,958
2014
($'000)
233
8,579
113
1,784
781
11,490
2,784
728
22,184
973
2,069
28,737
40,226
4,283
14,845
79
1,274
1,476
81
22,037
8
598
3,006
3,612
25,649
14,577
Profit and loss statement for the years ending 30 June 2014
Continuing operations
Revenue
Other income
Occupancy expenses
Salaries and employee benefits expenses
Depreciation and amortisation expenses
Advertising and marketing expenses
Administrative expenses
Other expenses
Finance costs
Share based payments expense
Profit (Loss) before tax from continuing operations
Income tax benefit / (expense)
Profit (Loss) for the year from continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Profit/(loss) after tax for the year from discontinued operations
Net profit/(loss) for the year
Other comprehensive income/(loses) for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year
2012
($'000)
31,690
717
(2,815)
(22,325)
(530)
(460)
(3,630)
(836)
(351)
(42)
1,419
(303)
1,116
1,116
(1)
1,115
2013
($'000)
31,719
590
(2,812)
(21,642)
(610)
(577)
(4,112)
(667)
(523)
(37)
1,330
(309)
1,021
1,021
1
1,022
2014
($'000)
27,476
782
(3,023)
(22,346)
(715)
(531)
(5,174)
(1,962)
(1,102)
(29)
(6,625)
2,129
(4,496)
(4,459)
(8,955)
2
(8,953)
Contents
1
Remuneration............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Remuneration of Administrators .......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Other relevant information re remuneration ........................................................................................ 1
Disbursements ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Page i
Remuneration
In accordance with Section 449E of the Corporations Act 2001 and the Australian Restructuring Insolvency
and Turnaround Associations Code of Professional Practice, we provide the following information in respect
of the Administrators remuneration for the period from 17 December 2014 to 18 January 2015 and for future
remuneration from this date.
The following information is provided to assist creditors consider the appropriateness of the remuneration
claims that are being made. Your approval of this remuneration will be sought at the Second Meeting of
Creditors to be held on Wednesday 28 January 2015.
Declaration
We, Michael Brereton and Cliff Rocke of KordaMentha, have undertaken a proper assessment of this
remuneration and disbursements claim for our appointment as Voluntary Administrators of the Company in
accordance with the law and applicable professional standards. We are satisfied that the remuneration
claimed is in respect of necessary work, properly performed, or to be properly performed, in the conduct of
the administration. We are satisfied that the disbursements claimed are necessary and proper.
1.1
Remuneration of Administrators
Period of remuneration
Amount
(ex GST)
Appendix
reference
$293,128
$66,990
$23,975
$70,250
Approval for the future remuneration sought for the period of the liquidation is based on an estimate of the
tasks to be completed. Should additional work be necessary beyond what is contemplated, further approval
may be sought from creditors.
Attached as appendices for each resolution period are schedules of tasks undertaken or to be undertaken
and calculation of remuneration by person for the period of actual remuneration. Information on the main
activities in those relevant task areas is summarised in the schedules to enable creditors to understand the
type and purpose of work being undertaken.
Resolutions to be proposed to creditors in respect of remuneration are detailed in Appendix 7 of this report.
1.2
In the First Circular to Creditors we estimated that fees would total $250,000 to the First Creditors Meeting
held on the 31 December 2014. This remuneration claim was significantly lower than the estimate provided
with fees to that date totalling $187,144.
We advise that we have not received any indemnity, guarantee or contribution from a member, director or
any other party related to the Company for our fees and expenses. We advise that we have not received
funding from any other source.
Page 1
ASIC has produced an Information Sheet entitled Approving fees: a guide for creditors that is attached as
Appendix 10.
Disbursements
Disbursements incurred for the period 17 December 2014 to 18 January 2015 are detailed in Appendix 8.
Where amounts have been paid to KordaMentha from funds in the administration of the Company for
externally provided goods or services, these are reimbursements to KordaMentha for amounts paid by
KordaMentha either because KordaMentha was invoiced directly or because funds were not available at the
time in the Administration. There have been no disbursements paid to date, therefore the disbursements in
Appendix 8 are disbursements that have been incurred by KordaMentha but not yet reimbursed. Where
payments to third parties have been paid directly by the Company, these are only included in the receipts
and payments at Appendix 9.
Disbursements have been categorised as follows:
Externally provided professional services these are recovered at cost. An example of an externally
provided professional service disbursement is legal fees.
Internal disbursements these are recovered on a reasonable commercial basis. These disbursements
are generally charged a cost, though some may be charged at a rate which recoups both variable and
fixed costs. Examples of internal disbursements include printing and postage costs, travel allowance
and data room hosting.
Details of our disbursement policy are included with the attached KordaMentha Rates National FY2015 at
Appendix 1 of this report.
Other information
This remuneration report should be read in conjunction with the Report to Creditors dated 20 January 2015.
A summary of the Administrators receipts and payments from the commencement of the Voluntary
Administration to 18 January 2015 is attached as Appendix 9.
If you have any queries in relation to the information provided for remuneration or a particular disbursement
incurred, please contact Andrew Hudson on (02) 8257 3023 or by email at ahudson@kordamentha.com.
Dated: 20 January 2015
Michael Brereton
Administrator
Cliff Rocke
Administrator
Page 2
$ per hour*
650
Director
595
Associate Director 1
550
Associate Director 2
500
Manager
475
400
Executive Analyst
375
325
Business Analyst
275
Administration
150
*Exclusive of GST
Page 3
Charge*
Travel Reimbursement
Up to $91.05 per day per staff member (unless other arrangements made)
*Exclusive of GST
KordaMentha classifications
Classification
Director
More than eight years experience and more than three years as a Manager.
Answerable to the appointee, but otherwise responsible for all aspects of an
administration. Controls staffing and their training.
Associate Director 1
Six to eight years experience with well developed technical and commercial
skills. Will have conduct of minor administrations and experience in control of
a small to medium team of staff. Assists with the planning and control of
medium to large administrations.
Associate Director 2
Five to seven years experience with well developed technical and commercial
skills. Will have conduct of minor administrations and experience in control of a
small to medium team of staff. Assists with the planning and control of medium
to large administrations.
Manager
Four to six years experience. Will have had conduct of minor administrations
and experience in control of one to three staff. Assists with the planning control
of medium to large administrations.
Executive Analyst
Business Analyst
Administration
Page 4
General description
Details of tasks
Assets
233 hours
$141,333
Intangible assets
Leased assets
Creditors
51 hours
$27,813
Creditor enquiries
Secured creditor
Shareholders
Reports to creditors
Proofs of debts
Employees
19 hours
$8,225
Employee enquiries
Entitlements
Statutory compliance
122 hours
$55,097
Notifications to ASIC
Correspondence with ASIC
Notification of appointment
Notifications to ASX
Correspondence
Directors
Meeting of creditors
Page 5
Task area
General description
Details of tasks
Correspondence to creditors, including mail distribution
Preparation of meeting documents, including agenda, attendance
register, list of creditors and resolutions
Preparation and lodgement of minutes of meeting with ASIC
Investigation
Planning/review
Engagement planning
97 hours
$51,128
Review of administration
Filing of documents
Update of work programs
File review
Insurance
ASIC reporting
General administration
Risk assessment
Set up of client
Processing in relation to client accounting
Remuneration
Trading
Media
Trade on Management
Attendance at offices
22 hours
$9,533
Page 6
Title
Michael Brereton
Samantha Findley
Cliff Rocke
Mark Korda
Paul Spottisw ood
Tony Ocallaghan
Matthew Okeefe
Fergus Calder
Sophia Spiliotopoulos
Andrew Hudson
Sheriden Bacon
Anna Mai
Kate Mcleod
Sam Hyles
Melissa Galletta
Tomas Berry
Adora Gaddi
Claire Dickinson - Temp
Diana D'Amato
Dilani Chandrasena
Tamara Kow alski
Theresa Mohr
Tracey Craw ford
Executive Director
Director
Partner
Partner
Executive Director
Managing Director
Associate Director
Manager
Manager
Executive Analyst
Executive Analyst
Senior Business Analyst
Executive Analyst
Senior Business Analyst
Administration
Business Analyst
Administration
Administration
Administration
Administration
Administration
Administration
Administration
Total remuneration
Assets
Creditors
Employees
Total
Trading
Standard
rate ($)
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
650
595
650
650
650
650
550
475
475
375
375
325
325
325
275
275
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
10.1
29.5
7.6
6.0
17.9
1.0
9.8
7.5
0.2
0.9
1.0
0.5
2.0
0.2
3.0
6,565
17,553
4,940
3,900
9,845
475
3,675
2,813
65
293
150
75
300
30
450
4.3
26.6
1.7
23.9
60.5
4.1
0.3
0.2
0.4
-
2,795
15,827
935
11,353
22,688
1,333
83
30
55
-
91.9
52.4
7.8
42.5
0.5
12.2
6.0
3.8
15.8
0.4
-
59,735
31,178
5,070
27,625
325
6,710
2,850
1,805
5,925
110
-
17.1
13.5
3.1
1.2
3.7
4.7
0.6
2.5
4.5
-
11,115
8,033
2,015
660
1,758
1,763
195
813
1,463
-
1.0
4.7
0.2
13.2
-
595
2,585
95
4,950
-
0.2
2.5
4.1
0.1
14.1
1.0
-
130
1,488
2,255
48
5,288
325
-
123.6
125.5
18.5
6.0
42.5
0.5
41.8
6.0
32.7
118.1
7.5
5.9
3.4
4.5
0.3
0.4
1.0
0.2
0.5
0.4
2.0
0.2
3.0
80,340
74,673
12,025
3,900
27,625
325
22,990
2,850
15,533
44,288
2,813
1,918
1,105
1,463
83
110
150
30
75
55
300
30
450
97
51,128
122
55,097
233
141,333
51
27,813
19
8,225
22
9,533
544
293,128
Page 1
General description
Details of tasks
Assets
52 hours
$28,575
Creditors
5 hours
$2,095
Creditor enquiries
Secured creditor
Shareholders
Reports to creditors
Proofs of debts
Employees
22 hours
$9,350
Employee enquiries
Entitlements
Statutory
compliance
40 hours
$19,840
ASIC
Notifications to ASIC
Correspondence with ASIC
Page 1
Task area
General description
Details of tasks
Preparation of meeting documents, including agenda, attendance
register, list of creditors and resolutions
Preparation and lodgement of minutes of meeting with ASIC
Administration
and risk
mitigation
13 hours
$7,130
Filing of documents
Update of work programs
File review
Preparation of transactions
Bank account reconciliations
Banking of deposits
ASIC reporting
Preparation of BAS
General administration
Remuneration
Page 2
Title
Michael Brereton
Samantha Findley
Andrew Hudson
Total rem uneration
Executive Director
Director
Executive Analyst
Standard
rate ($)
650
595
375
Assets
Creditors
Em ployees
Total
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
5.0
4.0
4.0
13.0
3,250
2,380
1,500
7,130
8.0
12.0
20.0
40.0
5,200
7,140
7,500
19,840
17.0
20.0
15.0
52.0
11,050
11,900
5,625
28,575
1.0
4.0
5.0
595
1,500
2,095
5.0
17.0
22.0
2,975
6,375
9,350
30.0
42.0
60.0
132.0
Page 1
$
19,500
24,990
22,500
66,990
General description
Details of tasks
Statutory
compliance
20 hours
$9,590
ASIC
Administration
and risk
mitigation
20 hours
$10,635
Correspondence
Ceasing to act
Notification to ASIC
Planning/review
Review of administration
Filing of documents
Update of work programs
File review
ASIC reporting
Preparation of BAS
Closure of client account and BAS portal
Remuneration
Finalisation
Creditors
5 hours
$1,875
Creditors
Employees
5 hours
$1,875
Employees
Page 1
Title
Michael Brereton
Samantha Findley
Andrew Hudson
Total remuneration
Executive Director
Director
Executive Analyst
Standard
rate ($)
650
595
375
Hours
Hours
5.0
8.0
7.0
20.0
3,250
4,760
2,625
10,635
2.0
7.0
11.0
20.0
1,300
4,165
4,125
9,590
Assets
Creditors
Hours
Total
Hours
Hours
Hours
5.0
5.0
1,875
1,875
5.0
5.0
1,875
1,875
7.0
15.0
28.0
50.0
Employees
Page 1
$
4,550
8,925
10,500
23,975
General description
Details of tasks
Assets
31 hours
$17,675
Employees
20 hours
$9,150
Employee enquiries
Correspondence re FEG
Preparation of notification spreadsheet
Preparation of FEG quotations
Preparation of FEG distributions
Statutory
compliance
52 hours
$25,055
Entitlements
ASIC
Investigation
Examinations
Litigation/recoveries
Administration
and risk
mitigation
Filing of documents
Update of work programs
File review
Page 1
Task area
General description
Details of tasks
20 hours
$12,340
Insurance
ASIC reporting
Preparation of BAS
General administration
Remuneration
Finalisation
Creditors
13 hours
$6,030
Creditor enquiries
Secured creditor
Proofs of debts
Page 2
Title
Michael Brereton
Samantha Findley
Andrew Hudson
Total remuneration
Executive Director
Director
Executive Analyst
Standard
rate ($)
650
595
375
Statutory compliance
Assets
Creditors
Employees
Total
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
8.0
12.0
20.0
5,200
7,140
12,340
5.0
19.0
28.0
52.0
3,250.00
11,305.00
10,500.00
25,055
10.0
15.0
6.0
31.0
6,500.00
8,925.00
2,250.00
17,675
1.0
4.0
8.0
13.0
650.00
2,380.00
3,000.00
6,030
2.0
5.0
13.0
20.0
1,300.00
2,975.00
4,875.00
9,150
26.0
55.0
55.0
136.0
16,900.00
32,725.00
20,625.00
70,250
Page 1
If the creditors vote for the Company to be wound up or the Administration to end, creditors of the Company
will be asked to consider the following resolution:
In respect of the period 28 January 2015 to conclusion of the Voluntary Administration:
That the estimated remuneration of the Administrators for the period 28 January 2015 to the conclusion of
the Voluntary Administration is determined and approved for payment on a monthly basis in arrears or as
required, up to a maximum of $23,975, excluding GST, calculated on the basis of time at the rates as set out
in the schedule titled KordaMentha Rates National FY2015.
If the creditors vote for the Company to be wound up and placed into Liquidation, creditors of the Company
will be asked to consider the following resolution:
In respect of the period 28 January 2015 to the finalisation of the Liquidation:
That the estimated remuneration of the Liquidators for the period 28 January 2015 to the finalisation of the
Liquidation is determined and approved for payment on a monthly basis in arrears or as required, up to a
maximum of $70,250, excluding GST, calculated on the basis of time at the rates as set out in the schedule
titled KordaMentha Rates National FY2015. However, if the value of the work performed exceeds the capped
amount, then we reserve the right to seek further approval of fees from creditors.
Page 1
Appendix 8 Disbursements
Disbursements paid or incurred during the period
17 December 2014 to 18 January 2015
Externally provided professional services
Basis
At cost
90,734.96
Actual $
(excluding GST)
90,734.96
At cost
Travel
1,073.03
Meals
60.65
Per Diem
227.55
Accommodation
449.55
Lodgement fees
149.00
1,959.78
92,694.74
Page 2
Payments
Balance
Opening Balance
Date
17/12/2014
22/12/2014
133,362
133,362
Interest received
31/12/2014
90
133,451
31/12/2014
(11)
133,440
09/01/2015
(187)
133,254
15/01/2015
14,925
148,179
15/01/2015
16/01/2015
16/01/2015
35,075
104,000
(8,496)
183,254
287,254
278,758
Closing Balance
18/01/2015
278,758
Mail re-direction
Sale of business deposit
(1)
(1)
These amounts relate to the sale of business assets of one of ILHs subsidiaries. These deposits are held on
trust for the secured lender.
Page 3
Page 4
INFORMATION SHEET 85
paid reasonable fees, or remuneration, for the work they perform, once these fees have been
approved by a creditors committee, creditors or a court, and
reimbursed for out-of-pocket costs incurred in performing their role (these costs do not need
creditors committee, creditor or court approval).
External administrators are only entitled to an amount of fees that is reasonable for the work that they
and their staff properly perform in the external administration. What is reasonable will depend on the
type of external administration and the issues that need to be resolved. Some are straightforward,
while others are more complex.
External administrators must undertake some tasks that may not directly benefit creditors. These
include reporting potential breaches of the law and lodging a detailed listing of receipts and payments
with ASIC every six months. The external administrator is entitled to be paid for completing these
statutory tasks.
For more on the tasks involved, see ASICs information sheets INFO 45 Liquidation: a guide for
creditors and INFO 74 Voluntary administration: a guide for creditors.
Out-of-pocket costs that are commonly reimbursed include:
Important note: This information sheet contains a summary of basic information on the topic. It is not
a substitute for legal advice. Some provisions of the law referred to may have important exceptions or
qualifications. This document may not contain all of the information about the law or the exceptions
and qualifications that are relevant to your circumstances. You will need a qualified professional
adviser to take into account your particular circumstances and to tell you how the law applies to you.
Australian Securities & Investments Commission, December 2008
Page 1 of 5
legal fees
Creditors have a direct interest in the level of fees and costs, as the external administrator will,
generally, be paid from the companys available assets before any payments to creditors. If there are
not enough assets, the external administrator may have arranged for a third party to pay any shortfall.
As a creditor, you should receive details of such an arrangement. If there are not enough assets to pay
the fees and costs, and there is no third party payment arrangement, any shortfall is not paid.
Creditors
Court
Administrator in a
voluntary administration
31
Administrator of a deed of
company arrangement
31
Creditors voluntary
liquidator
31
35
r3
Court-appointed liquidator
31
34, 5
32
1
2
3
4
5
If there is one.
If there is no approval by the committee or the creditors.
Unless an application is made for a fee review.
If there is no creditors committee or the committee fails to approve the fees.
If insufficient creditors turn up to the meeting called by the liquidator to approve fees, the liquidator is entitled to be paid
up to a maximum of $5000, or more if specified in the Corporations Regulations 2001.
indicate that they agree to the resolution. Unlike where acting as committee members, creditors may
vote according to their individual interests.
If a poll is taken, rather than a vote being decided on the voices or by a show of hands, a majority in
number and value of creditors present and voting must agree. A poll requires the votes of each creditor
to be recorded.
A separate resolution of creditors is required for approving fees for an administrator in a voluntary
administration and an administrator of a deed of company arrangement, even if the administrator is the
same person in both administrations.
A proxy is where a creditor appoints someone else to represent them at a creditors meeting and to
vote on their behalf. A proxy can be either a general proxy or a special proxy. A general proxy allows
the person holding the proxy to vote as they wish on a resolution, while a special proxy directs the
proxy holder to vote in a particular way.
A creditor will sometimes appoint the external administrator as a proxy to vote on the creditors
behalf. An external administrator, their partners or staff must not use a general proxy to vote on
approval of their fees; they must hold a special proxy in order to do this. They must vote all special
proxies as directed, even those against approval of their fees.
Calculation of fees
Fees may be calculated using one of a number of different methods, such as:
on the basis of time spent by the external administrator and their staff
Charging on a time basis is the most common method. External administrators have a scale of hourly
rates, with different rates for each category of staff working on the external administration, including
the external administrator.
If the external administrator intends to charge on a time basis, you should receive a copy of these
hourly rates soon after their appointment and before you are asked to approve the fees.
The external administrator and their staff will record the time taken for the various tasks involved, and
a record will be kept of the nature of the work performed.
It is important to note that the hourly rates do not represent an hourly wage for the external
administrator and their staff. The external administrator is running a businessan insolvency
practiceand the hourly rates will be based on the cost of running the business, including overheads
such as rent for business premises, utilities, wages and superannuation for staff who are not charged
out at an hourly rate (such as personal assistants), information technology support, office equipment
and supplies, insurances, taxes, and a profit.
External administrators are professionals who are required to have qualifications and experience, be
independent and maintain up-to-date skills. Many of the costs of running an insolvency practice are
fixed costs that must be paid, even if there are insufficient assets available to pay the external
administrator for their services. External administrators compete for work and their rates should reflect
this.
These are all matters that committee members or creditors should be aware of when considering the
fees presented. However, regardless of these matters, creditors have a right to question the external
administrator about the fees and whether the rates are negotiable.
It is up to the external administrator to justify why the method chosen for calculating fees is an
appropriate method for the particular external administration. As a creditor, you also have a right to
question the external administrator about the calculation method used and how the calculation was
made.
Australian Securities & Investments Commission, December 2008
Visit our website: www.asic.gov.au
Page 3 of 5
information that will enable the committee members/creditors to make an informed assessment of
whether the proposed fees are reasonable
Committee members/creditors may be asked to approve fees for work already performed or based on
an estimate of work yet to be carried out.
If the work is yet to be carried out, it is advisable to set a maximum limit (cap) on the amount that
the external administrator may receive. For example, future fees calculated according to time spent
may be approved on the basis of the number of hours worked at the rates charged (as set out in the
provided rate scale) up to a cap of $X. If the work involved then exceeds this figure, the external
administrator will have to ask the creditors committee/creditors to approve a further amount of fees,
after accounting for the fees already incurred.
the major tasks that have been performed, or are likely to be performed, for the fees
the fees/estimated fees (as applicable) for each of the major tasks
the amount of fees (if any) that have previously been approved
If you need more information about fees than is provided in the external administrators report, you
should let them know before the meeting at which fees will be voted on.
What can you do if you think the fees are not reasonable?
If you do not think the fees being claimed are reasonable, you should raise your concerns with the
external administrator. It is your decision whether to vote in favour of, or against, a resolution to
approve fees.
Generally, if fees are approved by a creditors committee/creditors and you wish to challenge this
decision, you may apply to the court and ask the court to review the fees. Special rules apply to court
liquidations.
You may wish to seek your own legal advice if you are considering applying for a court review of the
fees.
Australian Securities & Investments Commission, December 2008
Visit our website: www.asic.gov.au
Page 4 of 5
These are also available from the Insolvency Practitioners Association (IPA) website at
www.ipaa.com.au. The IPA website also contains the IPAs Code of Professional Practice for
Insolvency Professionals, which applies to IPA members.