FLUG MH17 - MH17 - Hauptgeschichte - English

1/13/2015
FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English
FLIGHT MH17
SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH
SHARE THIS STORY

Facebook
https://mh17.correctiv.org/english/
Twitter
Google+
E-mail
1/36
1/13/2015
THE FACTS
On July 17th Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down over Eastern Ukraine. All 298
passengers died. Back in the middle of June, the Nato showed pictures of Russian tanks
in the city of Snizhne in Eastern Ukraine. The German Bundeswehr and Nato know that
Russian tanks do not move through enemy territory without the protection of BUK
missile systems. Therefore, the flight altitude of ordinary planes was essentially a war
zone since the middle of June. According to the CORRECT!V investigation, the German
government and all other Nato countries would have had to warn the airlines not to fly
across Eastern Ukraine. The Dutch government already confirmed our investigation. The
German government still rejects it.
CORRECT!V talked to witnesses of the downing of Flight MH17 in Eastern Ukraine. In
a complex investigation in Vienna, the Netherlands, Ukraine, and Russia, we talked to
military experts, warlords of the separatists, former BUK engineers and former soldiers
of the 53rd Air Defense Brigade. All of them confirm: The separatists were not able to use
such a complex missile system. Therefore, only Russian officers could have given the
order to down Flight MH17.
On July 17th a lot of pictures and videos were taken of the BUK missile system in the part
of Eastern Ukraine that was controlled by separatists. The international investigative
team Bellingcat identified the BUK as part of the Russian 53rd Air Defense Brigade.
CORRECT!V checked the locations of the pictures and followed the path the Russian
BUK took.
CORRECT!V is publishing this investigation in cooperation with the German weekly
magazine Der Spiegel and the Dutch daily newspaper Algemeen Dagblad.
RELEASE DATE: 9.1.2015
TIME TO READ: ABOUT 35 MINUTES
one of the greatest war crimes of modern times and the truth still
I tshasnt
been told. On July 17th 2014 at about 16:20 local time, Malaysia
2/36
1/13/2015
Airlines flight MH17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine. All 298
passengers died, including many children. Who fired the missile? Over
several months the Berlin-based investigative newsroom CORRECT!V
has gathered facts, investigated in eastern Ukraine and Russia, and found
witnesses to the missile launch. The investigation unveiled a clear chain
of evidence. MH17 was downed by a ground-launched BUK missile
launched by a unit of the 53rd Russian Air Defense Brigade from Kursk.
The brigade unit, tasked with protecting Russian tank units, was
operating in mid July on Ukrainian territory without displaying national
emblems.
Less than half an hour after the plane crashed, the commander-in-chief of the proRussian separatists in Donbass, Igor Girkin, celebrated the downing of a Ukrainian
military jet. Girkin posted on his profile on the Russian version of Facebook,
Vkontakte: We warned you, dont fly through our sky.
The post is a success, it quickly received over 2000 likes. Then the post was deleted.
Girkin, formerly a colonel in the Russian intelligence service, later said the post was
fake.
From that point on people began to speculate about why flight MH17 was shot down
on its way from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.
American diplomats say the airliner was destroyed by a SA11 (BUK M1) missile fired
from territory controlled by pro-Russian separatists. The separatists reject blame.
Ukraine blames Russia, Russia blames Ukraine. Nobody offers any hard evidence.
The evidence is difficult to find. Eastern Ukraine is a war zone. In April 2014,
irregular forces evicted Ukrainian government officials from their offices in major
eastern Ukrainian towns including Luhansk and Donetzk. Since then Ukraine has
fought back mobilizing troops for attack supported by its air force. Meanwhile
Russia sent tanks forces into eastern Ukraine to reinforce the separatists.
Whoever wants to investigate this case needs to work their way through a thicket of
disinformation and false trails. There is absurd speculation including a claim that
flight MH17 is actually the Malaysian Airlines plane that disappeared in March 2014
and already had corpses on board when it crashed.
3/36
1/13/2015
READ OUR INVESTI

GATION IN A BOOK
OUR SHOP
MONTHS OF NEGLECT
4/36
1/13/2015
For a long time, the crash site was a macabre killing field. The passengers bodies
began to decompose in the hot Ukrainian summer as fighting continued and
people looted the luggage. After nerve-racking diplomatic negotiations, most of the
body parts were recovered and transported to the Netherlands.
Then for months nobody took care of the crash site.
In November a wing of the Boeing 777 stuck up out of a misty, overgrown field. In a
garden lay the broken pieces of a dead passengers record collection next to a piece
of the cockpit and an empty liquor bottle. Sometimes pro-Russian separatists posed
in front of the planes wreckage. The fighters were bored. Journalists rarely came
by anymore. A few days after our visit more parts of the wreckage were collected
and transported to the Netherlands.
After the launch: Clothes of the 298 victims of MH17 to be found.
5/36
1/13/2015
In September the Dutch air traffic authority OVV published an interim report based
on their investigation. The facts were listed without drawing conclusions or placing
blame. This work allows us to reconstruct the final minutes of the flight.
At around 13:00 UTC, 15:00 in Germany and 16:00 in eastern Ukraine, the pilot of
flight MH17 asks for permission to divert north by 20 nautical miles due to bad
weather. There are storms around Donetsk. The Ukrainian air traffic control grants
permission. Everything is normal. No excited voices, no panic, no disruptions in the
airplane. Thats what the black box shows.
Then the recording abruptly ends at 13:20 UTC, 16:20 local time.
The report says this is when the airplane was hit by a large number of objects with
high energy. These objects hit the airplane from above and the front at a high
speed and with such a force that the rump broke apart in the air.
THE KEY QUESTION IS WHY

Few people know more about the air-combat-weapon systems of the former Eastern
Bloc than Rupert Smid. He is a leading expert on air combat. Throughout our
investigation we met him as part of our reporting in several countries including
Ukraine, Russia, Austria and the Netherlands. His name is not really Smid but he
cant reveal his true identity. He works for an organization that does not want to be
involved in this issue. We can only assure you that Rupert Smid is a leading expert
on Russian air combat systems.
Smid tells us: There is no doubt: flight MH17 was shot down by a missile. And this
missile was fired from the ground and not from a fighter jet.
Smids information is confirmed by Harry Horlings, a former Dutch fighter pilot,
who was trained by the U.S. Air Force. Only a rocket fired from the ground has the
explosive power displayed in the destruction of MH17, Horlings says.
These experts say, fighter pilots would attack a hostile airplane from the tail and not
from the front. The back of the plane is the blind spot. Moreover, flight MH17 was
6/36
1/13/2015
approaching Russian airspace; it was shot down around 40 kilometers from the
border. An attack plane at this altitude and velocity would have to be coming from
Russian airspace, says the air combat expert Horlings.
A ground-to-air missile is programmed to explode just in front of and above the
targeted airplane, says Smid. The plane then flies through a cloud of deadly
shrapnel. And thats just what the Dutch investigators described. They said objects
with high energy that penetrated the airplane from the front and above.
And if it was a surface-to-air missile, officials from Russia and the U.S. say, it was a
BUK M1, an airplane killer developed by the Soviets. The BUK M1 is highly mobile
and can shoot down airplanes at high altitudes with great precision. It can easily
reach 15 kilometers of altitude, approaching its target at three times the speed of
sound. The warhead contains 70 kilograms of explosives. Just before impact it
explodes into thousands of pieces of sharp shrapnel objects with high energy.
A piece of MH17, hit by objects with high energy.
7/36
1/13/2015
A BUK-unit consists of four subunits which are often positioned kilometers apart: a
missile launch pad mounted on a tank; a radar car from which soldiers search the
sky for targets; a commando vehicle from which officers give the command to fire.
And a supply vehicle carries additional missiles. The subunits operate separately
and the radar and commando cars do not move with the BUK launch pad. On flat
ground they can be positioned up to 30 kilometers apart, says the air combat expert
Smid.
Another significant point is that the BUK M1 system acquires its targets with an
active radar: radar waves are transmitted into the sky, the enemy is acquired
through the returning echo. But the active radar places the BUK team in danger.
The pilot of the enemy fighter jet knows when he has been spotted. Smid: As soon
as a BUKs radar is opened, an alarm light flashes in the cockpit that fighter pilots
refer to as the Oh shit lamp.
The pilot immediately has all necessary information about the missile type and
position. The BUK team operating the radar is aware of this risk. A deadly duel
ensues: shoot first and survive.
Every second when the radar is on is life-threatening, confirms a former BUK
operator from the Ukrainian army in Kiev. For that reason, the radar is only active
for up to 40 seconds during attack.
Complicating things even more, the BUKs active radar cannot identify the type of
airplane targeted. Fighter jet? Passenger plane? It is difficult for missile operators
to tell. They can only determine whether a friend or foe is approaching. Friends are
airplanes of their own air force. All other aircraft are enemies. Civilian planes such
as MH17 are tagged as enemies. If the plane doesnt respond to the friend-foe
query, or sends the wrong response code, then the air defense team will treat the
aircraft as if it is an enemy aircraft, Horlings said.
The inherent poor design of the Soviet air defense system has had fatal
consequences in the past. In 2001 a misfired surface-to-air missile caused a
catastrophe. The Ukrainian forces mistakenly shot down a Russian civilian plane
near Crimea during a military exercise. All 78 passengers on board the Tupolev
8/36
1/13/2015
died. The Ukrainian Security Council took action to prevent a repeat incident:
Ukraine mothballed its surface-to-air missiles including BUKs for several years.*
* In a previous version of this story we incorrectly reported the civilian airliner
was destroyed by a BUK missile. The airliner was destroyed by an S-200 missile.
CORRECT!V corrects mistakes.
THE WHISTLEBLOWER
A graphic feature
Imeetwithaninformant.Heknowseverythingabout
Russianwarfare.
9/36
1/13/2015
Now we turn to the issue of tanks and the irresponsible carelessness of the
airlines. The BUK guided missile system has a clear tactical function to protect
tanks and ground troops. Russian tank units only move when they are
accompanied by BUKs, says Rupert Smid, the air combat specialist. Without
missile protection such vehicles are easy targets for fighter jets. This is a military
fact-of-life for military commanders in all NATO states.
Mobile air defense systems are always found in the vicinity of tanks, confirms a
German army spokesman. But the German Defense Ministry refused a request for
an in-depth interview. Anyone who knows that Russian tanks are accompanied by
BUKs which in turn create a threat for civilian airplanes might face questions
about why they didnt issue a warning.
In an email a German Defense Ministry spokesman cites a statement that the
Federal Government submitted in response to parliamentary questions in August
2014: The Federal Government could not assume that civilian air traffic at the
given altitude would be targeted in attacks.
Were there tanks in eastern Ukraine?
Yes on June 13th, around a month before MH17 was shot down, the US State
Department said Russian tank units crossed the border to Ukraine and were sighted
in the eastern Ukrainian town of Snizhne. NATO also published photographs of
tanks without national markings in this eastern Ukrainian town. Russia denies the
deployment.
In the following weeks the war escalated. Ukrainian fighter jets and helicopters
attacked tanks in the separatists territory, with success: the pro-Russian separatists
were pushed back.
But the Ukrainian air force also suffered losses. On July 12th a Ukrainian attack
helicopter was shot down over eastern Ukraine. Two days later an Antonov An-26
military jet suffered the same fate. Another two days later two Suchoi Su-25 fighter
jets were downed.
Experts say not all of these airplanes could have been hit by shoulder-fired missiles.
The targeting of the two Su-25 and the Antonov suggest the use of complex weapons
systems such as BUKs.
10/36
1/13/2015
In response to the new military situation, Ukraine changed its fighter jet strategy. A
Ukrainian Security Council spokesman said fighter jets were later deployed more
cautiously due to losses in the first phase of the anti-terror operations.
THE HUMAN SHIELDS

High above the conflict zone in June and early July, at an altitude above 10 000
meters, passenger jets continued to fly in the eastern Ukraine. In the week before
the disaster hundreds of airplanes crossed the war zone, including Lufthansa
flights.
After the Antonov was shot down, the Ukrainian air security authorities closed off
the airspace just below 10 000 meters. Above that level civilian air traffic continued
as before.
But even this altitude is a combat zone in modern air-tank warfare.
Besides the Su-25 planes, the Ukrainian air force also uses MiG-29 fighter jets that
can reach an altitude of 18 000 meters. The jets then drop down to a lower combat
altitude to attack enemy tanks and BUK units. A BUK team risks its life if it does not
already attack an enemy plane at a high altitude during its approach.
Civil air traffic granted Ukrainian fighter pilots valuable seconds in their fight for
survival against BUKs. Ukrainian fighter jets have the ability to hide just beneath
passenger planes without the civilian passengers and crew even knowing of their
presence. Anyone who targets a fighter jet from the ground risks shooting down a
passenger aircraft.
A spokesman for the Ukrainian Security Council said Ukraine did not deploy
combat aircraft on July 17th. The spokesman did not respond to questions about
civilian flights.
11/36
1/13/2015
THE HUMAN SHIELDS

FLIGHT RADAR FROM JULY 17TH AND JULY 24TH
ORTSZEIT
17.Jul01:00
17.Juli
24.Juli
EinProjektvonCORRECT!VundOpenDataCity
FlugdatenmitfreundlicherGenehmigungvonFlightradar24.com
KartendatenOpenStreetMapcontributorsbersichtallerFlgeEinbettenberunsereDaten
The EU states could have warned the airlines. Their military experts knew they
couldnt rely on cooperation with the Ukrainian authorities in a wartime situation.
In July 2014 the Ukrainian state was close to falling apart, a civil war was raging,
entire regions were occupied by Russian troops.
12/36
1/13/2015
But nothing happened. Germany and the EU were slow to call the war a war; its
member states knew that Russian tanks were in the separatists territory, but they
refrained from drawing the necessary conclusions. In an email response to
questions, a government spokesman cited the previously mentioned statement
which said Germany did not perceive a danger to civil aviation in eastern Ukraine
prior to July 17th.
For the airlines, diverting to longer alternative flight routes entails higher costs.
In an email, a Lufthansa spokesman said the German airline flew over eastern
Ukraine until July 17, 2014. Furthermore, he said that Lufthansa conducted a
security analysis, but only governments possess all the necessary military and
intelligence information required to determine risk. The spokesman said
Lufthansas primary concern is the safety of its passengers. Governments are
responsible for closing air routes, the spokesman said.
A spokeswoman for Germans Foreign Intelligence Service declined to comment for
this story.
Without their knowledge, hundreds of passengers became human shields in the
aerial war zone over eastern Ukraine.
PUTIN OFFERS EXPLANATIONS

In the evening after MH17 crashed, the Russian president Vladimir Putin made a
statement on Russian television. He said the government in Kiev is responsible for
the tragedy and directed the Russian authorities to collect objective information
about the catastrophe to offer the Russian view of the event to the world public.
Four days later, Lieutenant General Andrey Kartapolov, deputy chief of staff of the
Russian armed forces, presented the objective information in a press conference
that was broadcast live on TV. The officer sits under a massive screen with two stars
on his epaulette and neatly parted hair, offering maps, tables and photographs.
Kartapolov develops two scenarios for how MH17 might have been shot down, an
old principle of propaganda: mix the truth with so many plausible stories that even
absurd versions seem plausible.
The first scenario: Kartapolov said the MH17 could have diverted from its given
route and come within three kilometers of a Ukrainian fighter jet. This jet could
have fired a missile.
13/36
1/13/2015
An unlikely scenario: the Dutch report, which was published about a month after
the Russian press conference, makes no mention of a fighter jet in the vicinity of
MH17. CORRECT!Vs air warfare experts agree, the missile that destroyed MH17
was fired from the ground.
The second scenario: Kartapolov presents satellite pictures that allegedly show a
BUK unit from the Ukrainian army in a field near the village of Zaroshchenske. He
asserts that two points could be seen on July 17th: two BUK launch pads from
which the missile might have been launched. We went for a look.
In Zaroshchenske, about 50 kilometers from Donetsk, nobody saw a BUK on July

17th.
SUPPORT CORRECT!V
14/36
1/13/2015
YES, I WANT TO SUPPORT THE WORK OF CORRECT!V
NOBODY SAW ANYTHING

When a BUK is fired it produces noise and clouds of exhaust. The launch is
deafeningly loud; a BUK attack is accompanied by a substantial noise both during
the missile launch and its flight, according to a study by the Association of Russian
Engineers. Or, as the aerial-weapons expert Rupert Smid said: A blast, a prolonged
sound, a sonic boom, and a second explosion in the sky.
The missile is launched out of a fireproof container, leaving few visible burn marks
on the ground; the launch vehicle in turn leaves marks on the ground that are
identical to those of a tank.
Did the inhabitants of Zaroshchenske see or hear anything?
Eastern Ukraine, late October. The drive begins in Donetsk, a pro-Russian
separatist stronghold. Fear of war has frozen life in the city of over a million.
Shopping malls are closed or have been looted. Banks are bolted shut, cash
machines are empty. The streets empty before nightfall. Despite a ceasefire that
began on September 5th, explosions can be heard from the battle for control of the
citys airport.
Zaroshchenske is about 50 kilometers to the east via the N21 road. It connects
Donetsk and Luhansk, the two primary strongholds of the pro-Russian separatists,
and is controlled by their fighters. As was the case on July 17th. The road passes
through flat territory. The asphalt bears the scars of the war: traces of tanks and
explosions. The asphalt is initially thick, before Luhansk it becomes a dirt road.
Checkpoints have been set up before every town and turnoff. Armed men in
makeshift uniforms inspect the cars. There is a noticeable number of women in
camouflage among the fighters, they carry Kalashnikovs on their shoulders. The
15/36
1/13/2015
landscape is flat; we see heaps of coal and rubble along the horizon. Donbass is a
coal-ming region. But most of the mines are closed.
Zaroshchenske is an inconspicuous village. Flat wind-skewed farm buildings lie
along two streets; nearby are vegetable gardens and stables. Behind them is the
path seen on the satellite photos presented in July by the Russian Defense Ministry.
The clay path bears traces that could be from a tank. Deep marks in the ground can
be seen at two points. Something heavy must have been here.
But the overgrown field shows no traces that suggest a missile launch. Only one
thing is noticeable: a deep furrow has been dug behind one of the marks on the
ground. The rest of the field is unworked and completely overgrown.
The villagers will not be named in this story. The people in eastern Ukraine need to
be protected from possible consequences. The inhabitants of the separatists
territory are afraid of the pro-Russian separatists and of the Ukrainian army.
They dont want to say anything wrong.
Above the field a 70 year old retired woman lives in a little cottage. Her white hair is
tied back, her rugged face has been tanned by the sun. The old lady lives alone. No,
she says, on July 17th she noticed nothing out of the ordinary. No unusual noise, no
condensation trails, no suspicious vehicles. Definitely not from the Ukrainian army.
The Ukrainians werent here, they dont dare come to these parts.
The lady is an ardent follower of the Russian separatists and buys into the most
abstruse conspiracy theories. She said, US oil companies wanted to exterminate the
population of Donbass through fracking. After this failed, the US and the Ukrainian
fascists drew the country into war. Only Putin was able to prevent a genocide of the
Russian-speaking Ukrainian population, she said.
But many villagers have other worries. I have cows that need to be milked every
day, says a women who stands by the gate of her farm in a headscarf and jacket.
She was also in Zaroshchenske on July 17th and did not notice anything. She
received an excited call from a relative in Moscow after the press conference. But
no: All nonsense, nothing happened here. Up until now they have been spared
from the war, only one rocket flew over the town at the end of July. We ran into the
basement with the children, a resident said.
The villagers gather on the street. Nobody saw anything, nobody heard anything.
There was no BUK missile fired in Zaroshchenske on July 17th 2014. Definitely not
by the Ukrainian army because separatists control the fields around
16/36
1/13/2015
Zaroshchenske.
The Russian generals lead is a red herring.
THE BUKS PATH ACROSS EASTERN UKRAINE

There is a second hot lead discovered by an international investigative team.
Bellingcat.com is led by the young journalist Eliot Higgins. His method:
meticulously investigate the traces that an event leaves on the internet. Photos,
videos, posts in social networks. Higgins has shown that digging around in the
depths of the internet can lead to stunning revelations. Among other things,
Bellingcat was able to uncover secret arms shipments in Syria and reconstruct a
poison gas attack.
17/36
1/13/2015
And a BUK launch pad is an impressive vehicle. It is bound to be noticed.

On July 17th, the day of the catastrophe, a BUK launch pad is in transit on the N21
road. It leaves Donetsk in the late morning. It sits on a flatbed truck with a white
driving cab; a photographer from the French magazine Paris Match shot a photo
of it from a passing car. The photographer is close by: we can see the scuffed flank
of the launch pad, parts of an identification number that has been painted over are
visible.
On the side of the truck is a telephone number. It belongs to a truck rental company
in Donetsk. The owner later said the vehicle was stolen from him in June by proRussian separatists.
The truck with the BUK launch pad continues on its journey. It was filmed again in
Zuhres.
Later a pedestrian in the city of Torez photographed the BUK from a gas station.
The missile launcher later reached the mining town of Snizhne. Here the BUK drove
off the truck; a photo shows the armored vehicle driving through the city with four
missiles.
CORRECT!V investigators compared the photos from the web with the actual
venues. The photos are authentic. There is no doubt: on the afternoon of July 17th
2014 a BUK took position in the little mining town of Snizhne, a territory controlled
by Russian separatists.
THE PATH OF THE BUK
18/36
1/13/2015
All details picture for picture from the scene in Eastern Ukraine
WHERE DID THE MISSILE COME FROM?

Bellingcat was also able to determine the missile launchers origin. Every BUK has
an identification number. Based on an analysis of launch-vehicle photographs
posted in the internet, Bellingcat investigators concluded that a BUK launcher with
the identification number 3*2 (* stands for an illegible number) was photographed
while traveling in June with a convoy from western the Russian city of Kursk to the
Ukrainian border. Later on July 17th the same BUK, now with is identification
number 3*2 painted over, was photographed by the Paris Match photographer in
eastern Ukraine.
19/36
1/13/2015
Bellingcat investigators based their conclusion on an analysis of photographs of the

BUK launcher in Russia and later in Ukraine. The dents and scratches on the
launcher are identicallike a fingerprint.
The convoy was part of a unit dispatched by Russias 53rd Air Defense Brigade
which is based in Kursk. At the end of June, the convoy drove to the Ukrainian
border. CORRECT!V fact checked the Bellingcat results, their finding are
convincing.
And there are further peculiarities. A sergeant of the 53rd brigade who is
particularly active online posted numerous pictures of his unit on his page on
Vkontakte (vk.com), the Russian clone of Facebook. The sergeants name is Ivan
Krasnoproshin. Among his pictures is a photo of a document reporting his
discharge from the Russian army in mid-June. The photo showing a page in his
units logbook lists the names of the soldiers reporting for the evening roll call.
Number one: Sergeant Krasnoproshin, followed by 13 privates. Every day is crossed
off. The last entry is on June 13th. Then there is a hand-written note behind
Sergeant Krasnoproshins name: Discharged due to completion of service period
according to order no. (illegible).
Indeed, according to the logbook, Sergeant Krasnoproshin was not the only member
of his unit to be suddenly discharged from the Russian military on that day. Three
additional soldiers in Sergeant Krasnoproshins unitincluding Sergeant
Krasnoproshin nearly one third of the units memberswere discharged on the
same day and for the same reason.
Discharges of this type raise questions. The Committee of Russian Soldier Mothers
has reported that many soldiers are required to sign discharge papers before they
are sent to fight in Ukraine.
In the middle of June, several days after Krasnoproshin and his comrades were
discharged, the long convoy of the 53rd air defense brigade made its way towards
Ukraine. Again someone posted a photo in a social network. Again we can see the
same BUK launcher 3*2.
There is little doubt: it was the 53rd Russian air defense brigade from Kursk that
took position in Snizhne in eastern Ukraine on that fateful afternoon.
20/36
1/13/2015
THE CRIME SCENE

Snizhne, in November. The asphalt is furrowed with tank tracks. The marks are
everywhere. On the square by the market, on the main road, in little alleyways.
Countless tanks must have driven through here. The town has been controlled by
pro-Russian separatists since April. The marks could not have been created by
Ukrainian tanks.
July 15th 2014 two days before MH17 was shot down was a dark day in Snizhne.
At the break of dawn a missile hit and destroyed a residential building. More than
10 people died. Was it targeting tanks?
An Armenian restaurant near the market. Everything is red, the wallpaper, the
tablecloths and the chairs; curtains cover the windows. Alexander Bondarenko
enters the room. He is the leader of the pro-Russian separatists in Snizhne. Im a
miner, he introduces himself, offering a heavy handshake and a quiet voice. Until
the beginning of June he worked as an engineer at one of the mines. He has a
21/36
1/13/2015
rugged face and exerts the prudence of a technician. He only wears a uniform when
he must.
Bondarenko sits down at a table and folds his hands.
Question: There are photos of a BUK in Snizhne. Do you know about these
photos?
No. There was never a BUK in Snizhne.
Are you sure?
Absolutely sure. Otherwise it would have been photographed, just like the tanks.
Which tanks?
The ones that came from the region of Luhansk.
Who did the tanks belong to?
They didnt say on them who they belonged to, they were green. Ideally they were
ours. He laughs.
Who flew the attack on July 15th?
Those were Ukrainian fighter jets of the Su class.
How did you react to that?
We set up air defenses in the North of Snizhne because Russia is to the south and
we dont have to worry about anything coming from there.
Also with BUKs?
No. With shoulder-fired missiles. With a maximum range of 5000 meters altitude.
This is war, and the truth is a weapon. But Bondarenko admits that Russian tanks
were in the town and our research has revealed that BUKs must therefore be close
by, at least according to Russian military doctrine. And Bondarenko says that the
separatists established air defense systems in the north of Snizhne. An important
piece of information. This fits with a low-quality satellite photo published on the
Facebook page of the US embassy in Kiev. It shows an area north of Snizhne and a
field from which the deadly missile was allegedly fired at MH17.
22/36
1/13/2015
THE LAUNCH SITE

The field cannot be seen from the road. To the east, a factory site blocks the view to
the N21 road, a railway embankment and a little forest protect the field from sight
in the north. Beyond the embankment lies a settlement.
The field is unworked. There are a few beer bottles lying around. In some places the
ground is darker. Wide track marks are visible within a field of grain, too wide for a
tractor. They must be from a track vehicle with a wide wheel base.
The settlement by the railway embankment consists of flat farm buildings
surrounded by fences and walls. Dogs bark. At first there are no people in sight. If
someone appears, they immediately go on their way. The people are afraid. Theyll
kill me if I say something, says one man.
A woman lives with her daughter by the embankment. She was in her house on July
23/36
1/13/2015
17th 2014. I heard a loud bang, she says, then her neighbor called and told her
that an airplane had been shot down. We saw the smoke. She refuses to answer
any further questions.
After long knocks an old man with scrubby white hair under a cap appears and
agrees to talk. The man says he was not in the village in July, but that the roof of his
house was broken when he returned as was the case with many others in the
village. Everyone here has a clear memory of July 17th 2014. Everyone remembers
what they did on that day. Two women and two men come by. A conversation
begins.
A women says: An airplane flew by, well, we dont know if it was a plane. We heard
something, a long sound, then there was a noise. A zumm sound. A long prolonged
swooshing noise. She remembers it well.
Another woman could see thick smoke from the factory. Everyone was alarmed,
she said. Where did the smoke come from? She becomes unsettled. How should we
know what that was? We heard something explode.
A man suddenly says: Over there the railroad ties and the grass were burning. But
then one of the women elbows him in the side and he stops talking. A cell phone
rings, the people walk away.
THE WITNESS
A graphic feature
24/36
1/13/2015
Iwalkthroughthevillageoncemore.Itseems
extinct.
Another visit, two days later. Its early. The streets in the settlement are empty.
Dogs bark once again, they pull on chains between metal doors. After long knocks a
villager opens his front door. Are you a spy? is his first question after a quick
introduction. The man fled town in August because of the fighting. But on July 17th
2014 he was here. Any question about this day scares him.
I remember, but you know I wont tell you everything about that, Im afraid it
would end badly for me. The CORRECT!V journalist introduces himselfand
shows identification. He says that he is here to learn more. The people in Europe
want to know what happened, why so many people had to die here in Ukraine, shot
down in a peaceful airplane.
The man hesitates. Then he starts to talk: They shot it down. The missile flew from
here. We saw it, as it flew.
He points to the railway embankment. A friend of his had already seen the missile.
He called me and said, theres this amazing thing here with four missiles. The
friend will also remain unnamed. He is afraid. These are dangerous times. But one
25/36
1/13/2015
question still bothers the witness. They planned everything. I just dont know why
they brought the missile here?
He continues. I was in the yard and heard an explosion, a bang. It was a really loud
bang. The tiles on my roof shook. The bang came from over there, it was easy to
hear. Then there was a long sound. And then a very loud explosion: bang, bang. And
just as I ran out into the road, the plane began to fall. Down the road several
kilometers from here. Do you understand? And you could see it burn.
Asked about the loud bang, the witness had an explanation. It launched from over
there, he said.
When asked whether Russian soldiers or separatists fired the missile, the man
laughs. For him the rocket launch could only be executed by Russian soldiers.
Which miner shoots missiles? No, those were specialists. Do you think I go about
launching missiles?
This witness completes the picture: it was a BUK M1 rocket that brought the
passenger plane out of the sky brought into position by soldiers of the 53rd air
defense brigade from Kursk who were in the city of Snizhne without national
markings to protect Russian tank units.
Only one question is still open. Who gave the command to shoot? A Russian officer?
A pro-Russian separatist?
THE SMOKING GUN IN LUHANSK

On the evening of July 17th, when the news of passenger plane shot down is going
around the world, a video is made of the BUK launch pad. Once again, the missile
launcher is standing on the flatbed truck with a white driving cab. It drives under an
advertising sign for the Ukrainian car dealer Bogdan. The BUK launch pad is not
covered up. There is one missile missing.
This video is important because all sides even the Russians recognize it as
authentic.
Lieutenant General Kartapolow presented a freeze frame from the video at the press
conference in July and claimed that it was taken in Krasnoarmiisk. The city was
controlled by the Ukrainian army at that time. Kartapolow confirmed that the BUK
26/36
1/13/2015
launch pad is missing one missile. This provided proof for his conclusion: the video
proves that the Ukrainians are to blame.
We have a number of questions, said Lieutenant General Kartapolow at the press
conference. What kind of a missile launch pad is this? Where was it brought?
Where is it now? Why is it not transporting a full load of missiles? And when was it
last fired?
But when Bellingcat examined the Russian version of the freeze frame, they
discovered a text bubble had been inserted; when enlarged, it supposedly showed
the text of an advertisement with a car dealers address in Krasnoarmiisk.
But: it was faked.
In reality there is no address on the sign, it merely says: nationwide car dealer.
The Russian lieutenant general presented a photo montage.
But by confirming the freeze frame of the launcher was taken near the launch site,
shortly after the launch, the Russian Lieutenant General lent authenticity to many
other photos that show the BUK launch pad on the bed of a truck with a white
driving cab. On July 17th, on road N21, in the separatists territory.
The video with the missing missile was actually taken in Luhansk, at the end of road
N21 between the launch site and the Russian border. CORRECT!V investigators
visited the crossroads in Luhansk in November and can confirm: the site is
authentic. Even the advertisement for the car dealership Bogdan is still there,
although it is torn.
To recap: After the destruction of MH17, a BUK launch pad that was missing one
missile drove from Snizhne towards the Russian border.
Once again we want to know: who operated the BUK controls when the missile
launched? Who gave the command to fire? A Russian officer? A Ukrainian
separatist?
27/36
1/13/2015
Meeting the powerful separatist Aleksander Khodakovskiy.
MEETING WITH A WARLORD

A meeting with the powerful separatist commander Aleksander Khodakovskiy. Just
after July 17th he told a reporter from the news agency Reuters that the separatists
possessed a BUK on the day the plane was shot down. As soon as the statement was
made, he retracted it, claiming he had been misquoted. What did he really say?
Its nighttime, Khodakovskiy drives a heavy all-terrain vehicle through pitch-dark
Donetsk. He commands the Vostok battalion; the 42-year-old is proud to be the
principal leader of the separatist army. At this time of night the streets of Donetsk
are empty. The inhabitants are afraid to go out. The commander steps on the gas
pedal. A heavily armed bodyguard sits next to him.
During the drive the commander negotiates a deal with the Ukrainian army via
radio. One of his subordinates wants to go to his fathers funeral on Ukrainian
territory and requires safe passage. Khodakovskiy used to be in the Ukrainian spy
service. He is a specialist for counter-terrorism and still has many friends on the
other side. The Ukrainian loves deals, and he wants the reporter to take note.
He reads Kierkegaard and cites Schopenhauer. A kind of eastern Ukrainian
28/36
1/13/2015
Wallenstein. What we need, we steal, he says. Like a flatbed truck with a white
driving cab?
Then Khodakovskiy says: I know for sure that the popular militia did not shoot
down the Boeing.
Why not?
We dont have and didnt have specialists who can operate such high precision
weapons systems.
Do you have BUKs?
Now I have one.
As on July 17th?
Again Khodakovskiy evades the question: I knew that the BUK missile was on its
way there at the time of the tragedy, but it didnt arrive. And when the tragedy
occurred, they didnt want to be blamed. So as far as I know the missiles were sent
back.
Question after question, he avoids direct answers. Again and again. But he admits
two things: The missile that destroyed MH17 was fired from the area around
Snizhne but not by the separatists. And the separatists cant operate complex
weapons systems such as a BUK.
Who pulled the trigger?
Khodakovskiy takes his time to answer the question. He drinks a sip of tea and talks
about world politics, from the US to Russia. He lectures more than he answers the
questions. At the end the commander becomes philosophical. Whats important is
not the action itself, but the perpetrators relation to the action. The perpetrator
could be proud of his crime, or regret it.
Is this thought marked by a feeling of guilt? And what would the separatists
relation be to the shooting down of a passenger plane with 298 victims? Complicity?
Shared responsibility?
ONLY SPECIALISTS CAN OPERATE THE EQUIPMENT

29/36
1/13/2015
The air combat expert Rupert Smid has no doubt: Russian missiles are only fired
on the command of Russian officers, he says.
July 17th did not begin well for the crew of BUK 3*2. That morning, the Ukrainian
Security Council reported the destruction of three Russian tanks which officers of
the 53rd air defense brigade are tasked to protect. The Russian soldiers had failed,
and they were under pressure not to allow a repeat incident.
The BUK is outdated, but it is a highly complex and deadly system; its mastery
requires continuous training. During the Soviet era soldiers learned how to operate
the guided missile system at the Institute for Missile Technology in Kiev. The
training took five years. The institute in the Ukrainian capital was closed in 1995.
Russia continues to train soldiers at missile schools, including one in Smolensk.
Many of the former graduates in Ukraine have left the service, but they remember
their time as students.
Its not like riding a bicycle, says one former graduate from the missile institute.
The BUK squad needs to be a well-rehearsed team that continuously trains the
process. Even veterans lose touch quickly, says one former soldier. Today he is a
businessman. He does not want his name to be printed.
Viktor Kusovkin, a comrade of Ivan Krasnoproshin, confirms these statements.
Kusovkin served in the 53rd Russian air defense brigade in Kursk. After four
months of training he was allowed to drive the BUK launcher tow vehicle. We reach
him via telephone, Viktor Kusovkin had posted his number on Vkontakte (vk.com).
Firing a BUK? That never even came into question for him. Of course not. You
dont let conscripts fire. That doesnt work. You have to graduate from a military
institute first, said Kusovkin. Thats a pretty difficult task. Only officers can do it.
We asked many experts who could have fired the missile that destroyed MH17. We
spoke to separatist leaders: military commander Khodakovskiy and the deputy
prime minister of the self-named Peoples Republic of Dontzk Andrej Purgin. We
also asked our international air warfare experts and our witnesses at the site of the
launch. We heard the same from graduates of the Institute for Missile Technology
in Kiev and former soldiers of the 53rd Air Defense Brigade in Kursk. They all agree,
the separatists did not have the know-how to fire a BUK missile. There is hardly any
doubt: a Russian officer must have given the order to shoot down MH17.
30/36
1/13/2015
EVERYONE SHARES THE BLAME

The Russian military under Vladimir Putin is responsible for the downing of MH17.
The Russian military destabilized east Ukraine; it provided the separatists with
troops and the equipment needed to kill the passengers aboard MH17. The attack
could halve been intentional or occurred in a moment of panic.
The Ukrainian government takes partial responsibility. It used the passengers of
civilian aircrafts as human shields in air attacks on Russian tanks. Its fighter jets
hid among planes packed with vacationers, placing hundreds of innocent lives at
risk.
The German government and the EU governments must also assume partial
responsibility. They were afraid to call the war in eastern Ukraine a war and did not
prohibit airlines from flying over the war zone. The EU should have recognized that
Russian tanks and air defense units were active in Ukraine and ordered a no-flyzone. Politicians focused on negotiations with Russia rather than the security
situation.
Finally, the airlines are also responsible because they didnt see the danger, and
they endangered the lives of their passengers by flying over eastern Ukraine.
They all share responsibility.
President Putin is primarily responsible. But to this day the international
community has not addressed this issue.
THE COURAGEOUS AIR ACROBAT

Now, let us try the impossible we want to find out which Russian officer ordered
the missile launch.
Kursk, December 2014. The 53rd air defense brigade is situated in a pine forest east
of the city. Even the name sounds like a tank rolling over asphalt: not far from the
city the German Wehrmacht and the Soviet army fought one of the largest tank
battles in history in the summer of 1943 with over 10 000 vehicles. The
cemeteries of the fallen soldiers stretch into the horizon.
Memories of the Great Patriotic War mark the city. A slogan on a high-rise
building reads Kursk, city of war glory; extensive myths of honor commemorate
31/36
1/13/2015
the victory and everlasting glory. A wide road was turned into a mile of victory
after the end of the Soviet Union; it has an arch of triumph, a church, tanks and
cannons between the lanes.
Kursk, December 2014, Marschall Schukhow.
Drizzling rain, temperatures just below freezing; the winter is mild and gray. People
are anxious, the fall of the ruble exchange rate has caused worry.
These days it is difficult to approach soldiers and officers. Russias military
institutions are secretive, and now Russian television only shows the Kremlins
propaganda: a fascist coup dtat has occurred in Ukraine; the US is crushing
Russia; foreigners are spies.
32/36
1/13/2015
The officers of the 53rd air defense brigade the men who could have given the
order to shoot down the civilian airplane live with their families in the high-rise
complex Marschall Schukhow in a pine forest across from the barracks. The
complex was built by a Turkish construction company in 1992 with funds from the
German government. It was to be a home for Soviet soldiers who were relocated
from Berlin to Russia after German reunification. Today about 4500 people live in
Schukhow.
Five-story buildings, a school, nursery school and an officers house. The complex
has seen better days. The streets are ripped up, there is no restaurant or caf. Only
small shops that mainly sell cigarettes and liquor.
In the evening the children who live in the complex perform during a concert in the
officers house. They plan to present dances from around the world. For a long
time the room is empty aside from the childrens parents. But then, five minutes
before the show begins, about 60 recruits from a neighboring barracks arrive on the
scene.
Lockstep march, gather, halt. The recruits take position by the entrance. Then they
march into the concert hall.
Can we talk to you?
No, exerts a commander, no questions.
Is it Okay to take photos?
Alright, fine with me.
The children dance and sing. The soldiers clap. The concert comes to an end after
one hour. Stand up, halt, and march back to the barracks. One of the soldiers
manages to hop into a store to buy cigarettes. Then they disappear into the
pinewood forest.
Eventually a businessman puts us in contact with a government official; if anyone
knows something about the missile brigades movements, then it is him and his
colleagues.
We meet Sergej also an alias in an almost empty restaurant. We speak in
whispers. We fall silent when the waitress approaches the table, but we have
permission to record the conversation on tape.
For a long time the official talks about his work, his former colleagues, the missile
33/36
1/13/2015
brigade. Suddenly he remembers something unusual. You know, I have many

friends who are fighter pilots, and I know from them that the Russian air force has a
tradition: they celebrate military victories with wild air acrobatics. The pilots are
allowed to have some fun.
On July 17th he looked out the window and saw something incredible. A Russian
Su fighter jet was going crazy in the sky. The pilot was making the most daring
stunts. It was magnificent.
Sergej watched the air show go on and on. I figured they must have some reason to
celebrate, he continues. Shortly after that he saw the news about MH17 on TV.
That shocked me. Was it a coincidence? I cant say.
YOUVE GOT INFORMATION FOR US?
HERES OUR ENCRYPTED UPLOAD PLATFORM
BECOME A MEMBER
YES, I WANT TO SUPPORT THE WORK OF CORRECT!V
34/36
1/13/2015
STEAL OUR STORY

yourself! CORRECT!V is a non-profit newsroom. We want to uncover
H elpwrongdoing
to change society for the better. To achieve this goal, we
need as many people as possible to read our stories. Therefore we are happy if
you make use our stories by taking, republishing or sharing them. With each
story we will offer you a brief summary of the most important facts. It doesnt
matter if youre a local blog, an online-platform, a newspaper or a radio
station: Please, help yourself, for free. Use our long-form story or our short
summaries. There are only two conditions: You cant use it before Saturday
the 10th of January 2015 and we want you to notify us at info@correctiv.org.
Please notify us, if you want to use any multimedia elements of the story. If
you have a question, dont hesitate to contact us via E-Mail. Thanks!
PLEASE DONATE
CLICK HERE TO DONATE FOR CORRECT!V
2014 CORRECT!V
Investigators and Writers: Marcus Bensmann, David Crawford
In Charge: David Schraven
Copy Editor: Ariel Hauptmeier
Redaktion: Daniel Drepper, Jonathan Sachse, Benedict Wermter, Julia Brtz.
Video: Jannis Keil
35/36
1/13/2015
In Cooperation with SPIEGEL and Algemeen Dagblad, Netherlands.

Data Journalists: Stefan Wehrmeyer, Simon Jockers
Data Research Flight Movement: OpenDataCity
Photos: Ivo Mayr (verantwortlich), Anastasia Vlasova, bellingcat, Algemeen
Dagblad
Photo Cover: Anastasia Vlasova
Illustrator: Vincent Burmeister
Art Direction: Thorsten Franke / mediaPolis
Copy Rights for the story about the victims from the Netherlands: Algemeen
Dagblad, Niederlande.
__________________
IMPRESSUM
Contact: info [at] correctiv.org
36/36

FLUG MH17 - MH17 - Hauptgeschichte - English

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

FLUG MH17 - MH17 - Hauptgeschichte - English

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

1/13/2015

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

SHARE THIS STORY

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

RELEASE DATE: 9.1.2015

TIME TO READ: ABOUT 35 MINUTES

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

READ OUR INVESTI

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

After the launch: Clothes of the 298 victims of MH17 to be found.

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE KEY QUESTION IS WHY

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

A piece of MH17, hit by objects with high energy.

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE HUMAN SHIELDS

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE HUMAN SHIELDS

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

PUTIN OFFERS EXPLANATIONS

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

In Zaroshchenske, about 50 kilometers from Donetsk, nobody saw a BUK on July

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

YES, I WANT TO SUPPORT THE WORK OF CORRECT!V

NOBODY SAW ANYTHING

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE BUKS PATH ACROSS EASTERN UKRAINE

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

And a BUK launch pad is an impressive vehicle. It is bound to be noticed.

THE PATH OF THE BUK

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

WHERE DID THE MISSILE COME FROM?

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

Bellingcat investigators based their conclusion on an analysis of photographs of the

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE CRIME SCENE

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE LAUNCH SITE

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

THE SMOKING GUN IN LUHANSK

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

Meeting the powerful separatist Aleksander Khodakovskiy.

MEETING WITH A WARLORD

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

ONLY SPECIALISTS CAN OPERATE THE EQUIPMENT

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

EVERYONE SHARES THE BLAME

THE COURAGEOUS AIR ACROBAT

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

Kursk, December 2014, Marschall Schukhow.

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

FLUG MH17 | MH17 Hauptgeschichte English

brigade. Suddenly he remembers something unusual. You know, I have many