Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SPECIAL FEATURE
With Iraq in a state of bloody chaos, many, from both sides of the political divide, are calling for an
immediate withdrawal of all foreign forces. No matter what the consequences of withdrawal, they
argue, the Coalition presence is only making the security situation worse and is helping to fuel the
insurgency.
But Iraq is already in a civil war. Day by day, jihadist paramilitaries are gaining experience in urban
combat against arguably the best equipped and trained military in the world, the US Army and
Marine Corps. Meanwhile, the interests and credibility of the US, Britain and other Coalition partners
are only damaged further by this prolonged and disastrous occupation.
The choice, however, is not simply between ‘stay the course’ or ‘cut and run’. Nor should withdrawal
itself be seen as either ‘surrender’ or ‘the answer to all of Iraq’s problems’. It is dangerous that the
current debate is being thus polarized.
The simple fact is that Coalition troops need to be withdrawn from Iraq because most of the
insurgency is actually a resistance to foreign occupation. The majority of Iraqis now want withdrawal.
But because a significant part of the violence is occurring between Iraq’s diverse factions and
communities, withdrawal on its own could have deadly consequences. It could be as disastrous as
the invasion itself. The countries responsible for the invasion cannot simply pull out and leave the
Iraqi people to their fate. While they may not be a part of the solution, they have a grave
responsibility to support the Iraqi Government in finding a way to ensure the long-term security of
the country.
1
New Internationalist, December 2007
The Iraq Study Group was a bipartisan Congressional panel facilitated by the United States Institute
of Peace and tasked with assessing the situation in Iraq and recommending policies to the US
Government. The Group’s final report – published in December 2006 – focused on the phased
withdrawal of troops and diplomatic engagement with Iraq’s neighbours. Despite promising to take
the report seriously, President Bush largely ignored the Group’s findings and took the opposite
course of committing to the ‘surge’. View the report: http://tinyurl.com/ts4vs
The UK Iraq Commission was an independent, cross-party group, tasked with producing a blueprint
for future British involvement in Iraq. The final report – published in July 2007 – argued that only
Iraqis can improve the situation in Iraq, but that they needed British support to do so. Despite being
televised, the Commission did not generate as much interest as the US Iraq Study Group had, and
the final report was largely overshadowed by Gordon Brown’s arrival as the new Prime Minister.
View the report: http://tinyurl.com/3anf4a
Following George W Bush’s rejection of the bi-partisan Iraq Study Group report and the lack of
impact of its British equivalent, many in the political, media, academic and activist communities
seem to have accepted that nothing can be done, that there is little point in suggesting ways forward
for Iraq because they will simply be ignored. But there is a moral imperative not only to keep
pointing out the failure of current policies but also to suggest alternative ways forward.
The change of Prime Minister in Britain and growing unease within the US political system present
the opportunity for a break with the past. This is why new policies that go beyond withdrawal are so
important at this juncture.
They might include the following proposals aimed at resolving some of the causes of the conflict:
2
New Internationalist, December 2007
3
New Internationalist, December 2007
Of course there will not be agreement with all, or perhaps any, of the above proposals. There are,
after all, no easy answers and no guarantees of success in Iraq. But that does not absolve us of our
responsibility to develop and propose positive ways out of the current fiasco.
What’s important is that we continue publicly to debate our involvement in Iraq and support those
developing effective policies for the withdrawal of troops. Governments must be made to understand
that there are ways of withdrawing troops from Iraq that will not necessarily result in disaster. It is up
to all of us to make sure this happens.
Chris Abbott is the Programme Co-ordinator and Researcher at Oxford Research Group and
lead author of Beyond Terror: The Truth About the Real Threats to Our World (Rider, 2007).
Chris Abbott, “How to withdraw from Iraq”, New Internationalist (December 2007)
http://www.newint.org/features/special/2007/12/01/chris-abbott/