Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
WRITING STRATEGY
(A Pre-Experimental Research in SMP Negeri 17 Pontianak in
Academic Year 2013/2014)
AN ARTICLE
By:
TIAN LESTARI
F42108059
Treatment
Pos-test
X1
X2
Based on the problem that the researcher found when she did the teaching
practice, she tried to solve the problem in writing descriptive text especially to
eighth grade students. Class VIII C with 34 students was chosen as the sample.
This group is determined by using random sampling because by using random
sampling, the likelihood or bias is reduced.
Technique and Tools of Data Collecting
1. Technique of Data Collecting
In order to conduct this research, the researcher applied
measurement technique. The measurement technique in this research was
through written test. The kind of written test was administered twice. First,
pre-test to collect the data before the treatment. Second was post-test to
collect the data after a treatment wass given.
2.
Tools of Data Collecting
The data are collected by applying written test. The test was used to
measure students aility in organizing text, using language features, and
mechanics.
Technique of Data Analysis
To know the content of the test, the researcher constructed a table of test item
and specifications. Therefore, the subject matter tested and the level of
achievement can be seen clearly.
To answer the problems in Research Design, mean, ES, and Sp formula will
be applied. The formula are as follows:
1. ES =
M 2M 1
SP
Where :
ES = Effect size of the independent variable on the dependent variable.
M 1 = Mean of Post-Test
M 2 = Mean of Pre-Test
The result of ES is then classified as shown below
Criteria of ES
ES < 0,2
Low
Moderate
ES > 0,8
High
2. To find out the standard deviation (Sp) of the above formula, the following
formula is applied:
2
2
Sp = ( Ne1 ) S e + ( Nc1 ) S c
Ne+ Nc2
Where:
Sp = The standard deviation
N = The total number of students
Ne = The total number of students who participated in Post-Test.
Nc = The total number of students who participated in Pre-Test.
Se2 = Standard deviation of Post-Test score.
Sc2 = Standard deviation of Pre-Test score.
3. To find M1 or M2, the formula in mean score formula is applied as follows:
X
X
N
Where :
X = the mean score
X = the sum of individual score
N = the total number of individuals
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Pretest was held November 26th 2013 aimed at knowing students
achievement before the treatment. From the pretest, students weakness were in all
aspects (organization, grammar and usage, vocabulary, and mechanics).
Post test was held on December 6 th 2013 aimed to know the students
achivement after the treatment. students were improving in all aspects that are
organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics. From the research findings
between pre test and post test, the writer found the difference between them.
the writer found mean score of pre test was 51,09 and post test was 70,44.
Also the interval between pre test and post test was 19,35.
X 1
X1
N
1737
34
= 51,09
2. Mean score of post test ( X 2
X 2
X2
N
2395
34
= 70,44
3. The standard deviation of the students score
Sc
=
=
2
X 1 X 1
9376.73
34
275,79
=
= 16, 61
Se
2 2
X 2 X
4428,38
=
34
= 130,28
= 11,41
2
2
= ( Ne1 ) S e + ( Nc1 ) S c
Ne+ Nc2
2
2
= ( 341 ) (11,41) + ( 341 ) (16,61)
34+342
( 33 ) ( 130,19 ) + ( 33 ) (275,89)
=
682
4296,27+9104,37
=
66
13400,64
=
66
= 203,04
= 14,25
Sp
The result of the effect size (ES) shows how effective is teaching
writing a descriptive text by using guided writing strategy. The
calculation is as follows:
2 X 1
X
SP
70,4451,09
=
14,25
19,35
= 14,25
= 1,36
ES =
From this result, the significant score of effect size is categorized as high
with ES > 0,8 In other words, guided writing strategy has proved by the
measurement techniques of data collecting as a good activity in teaching writing
descriptive text.
Based on the result of the data computation, the effect of the treatment (ES)
is 1,36. It was used to answer the problem of how effective the use of guided
writing strategy in teaching writing descriptive text to the eighth grade students of
SMP 17 Pontianak in academic year 2013-2014. Based on the result (ES > 0,8), it
was categorized as high. Therefore, the first hypothesis, the effectiveness of
teaching writing a descriptive text by using guided writing strategy is high, is
accepted.
The researcher compared the score of pre test and post test. On the first
meeting to get data about students achievement before the treatment, students
were given a writing test. As can be seen in Table 4.1, students weakness were in
all aspects of writing (organization, grammar and usage, vocabulary, and
mechanics). Post test shows better result. Students were improving in all aspects
that are organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics.
The Result of Students Score of Pretest and Posttest
Pre-test
1737
Post-test
2395
Difference
658
98117
173135
19770
From the both result of pre test and post test, it can be seen that the score of
guided writing strategy is much higher than the traditional method. Therefore it
can be concluded that guided writing strategy is more effective in teaching writing
a descriptive text at eight grade students of SMP Negeri 17 Pontianak in academic
year 2013/2014.
3. The teacher should keep guiding the students so that they will not loose their
attention during the writing process.
4. The students have to practice more to improve their writing skill because
they deal much with writing tasks.
5. In writing tasks, such as writing sentences, paragraph or even text, can not
be separated from grammar aspects. The knowledge of grammar is needed
to help in writing with the correct structure and order.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Byrne, Don. (1993). Teaching Writing Skills. Singapore: Longman.
Welsh Assembly Government. (2010). Guidance on The Teaching
of Writing Skills. Cymry Ifanc Young Weldsh.
Pincas, Anita. (1982). Teaching English Writing. London: MacMillan.
Primary National Strategy. (2007). Improving Writing With A Focus on Guided
Writing. Department for Children, Schools, and Family.
Frase, L. (2008). Effective Teaching Solution: Guided Writing. Retrieved on
November
25,
2012,
from
effectiveteachingsolutions.com
/guidedwriting.pdf.
Brown, Douglas H. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive
Approach to Language Pedagogy. Third Edition.
San
Fransisco : Pearson.
Grabe, William., and Kaplan, Robert B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing:
An Applied Linguistic Perspective. New York: Longman.
Ontario Education. (2005). A Guide to Effective Instruction in Writing. Ontario:
Ontario Education.
Cohen, Louis., Lawrence, Manion., Morrison, Keith. (2005). Research Methods in
Education. London: Routledge.