Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Mustafa Khalid .T
Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department
University of Technology
Baghdad Iraq
Email: m_kt80@yahoo.com
I.
antennas,
combined
fractal
INTODUCTION
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Figure 1.
Iteration 3
Iteration 4
Iteration 0
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 0
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Iteration 3
Figure 3.
Construction of the combined geometry (Different Iterations of
Koch curve combined with second iteration Hilbert curve)
IV.
Real part
Imag. part
2D combined geometry
TABLE I.
Resonance
Frequencies
(MHz)
Input Impedance ()
Frequency
Spacing
(MHz)
jX
fn+1 - fn
f1 =500
2.92
-1.05
f2 = 1400
47
-1.07
900
f3 = 1585
218
-0.1
185
f4 = 2200
72.6
-9.4
615
f5 = 2960
71.1
-12
760
Input Impedance ()
Frequency
Spacing
(MHz)
jX
f1 =475
2.59
-1.8
fn+1 - fn
f2 = 1355
46.3
2.48
880
f3 = 1535
213
3.5
180
f4 = 2150
73.3
-2.81
615
f5 = 2960
74.6
-11.7
810
XY- plane
XY- plane
XZ - plane
XY- plane
YZ - plane
XY- plane
f = 500 MHz
f = 1400 MHz
f = 475 MHz
f = 1355 MHz
XY- plane
XY- plane
XY- plane
XY- plane
XY- plane
f = 22\00 MHz
XY- plane
f = 2960 MHz
f = 2150 MHz
f = 2960 MHz
(a)
References
[1]
[7]
[8]
V. Conclusions
In this paper, 2D and 3D combined fractal dipole antenna
is studied. The simulation results show the following:
The simulation of fractal antennas with Koch curve or
Hilbert curve alone shows that these antennas have
their first resonance frequency below the design
frequency [7-8-13]. But with this combined geometry
the first resonant frequency was exactly the same
design frequency in the case of 2D geometry, and the
difference was 5% in the case of 3D geometry.
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]