Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Fabiana Andrade Machado , Fbio Yuzo Nakamura & Solange Marta Franzi De Moraes
a
To cite this article: Fabiana Andrade Machado , Fbio Yuzo Nakamura & Solange Marta Franzi De Moraes (2012)
Influence of regression model and incremental test protocol on the relationship between lactate threshold using the
maximal-deviation method and performance in female runners, Journal of Sports Sciences, 30:12, 1267-1274, DOI:
10.1080/02640414.2012.702424
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.702424
State University of Maringa, Department of Physical Education, Maringa, Brazil, 2State University of Londrina,
Department of Physical Education, Londrina, Brazil, and 3State University of Maringa, Department of Physiologic Sciences,
Maringa, Brazil
(Accepted 30 May 2012)
Abstract
This study examined the influence of the regression model and initial intensity of an incremental test on the relationship
between the lactate threshold estimated by the maximal-deviation method and the endurance performance. Sixteen noncompetitive, recreational female runners performed a discontinuous incremental treadmill test. The initial speed was set
at 7 km h71, and increased every 3 min by 1 km h71 with a 30-s rest between the stages used for earlobe capillary
blood sample collection. Lactate-speed data were fitted by an exponential-plus-constant and a third-order polynomial
equation. The lactate threshold was determined for both regression equations, using all the coordinates, excluding the
first and excluding the first and second initial points. Mean speed of a 10-km road race was the performance index
(3.04 + 0.22 m s71). The exponentially-derived lactate threshold had a higher correlation (0.98 r 0.99) and
smaller standard error of estimate (SEE) (0.04 SEE 0.05 m s71) with performance than the polynomially-derived
equivalent (0.83 r 0.89; 0.10 SEE 0.13 m s71). The exponential lactate threshold was greater than the
polynomial equivalent (P 5 0.05). The results suggest that the exponential lactate threshold is a valid
performance index that is independent of the initial intensity of the incremental test and better than the polynomial
equivalent.
Introduction
The lactate threshold has been used widely to predict
endurance performance, prescribe training intensity
and evaluate training effects (Allen, Seals, Hurley,
Ehsani, & Hagberg, 1985; Billat, 1996; Papadopoulos, Doyle, & Labudde, 2006). There are several
techniques that can detect lactate thresholds (Davis,
Rozenek, DeCicco, Carizzi, & Pham, 2007; Tokmakidis, Leger, & Pilianidis, 1998; Thomas, Costes,
Chatagnon, Pouilly, & Busso, 2008). Specifically, the
maximal-deviation method (Dmax) proposed by
Cheng et al. (1992) can evaluate mechanisms that
underpin long-distance running and cycling performance. In most studies, lactate threshold determined
by the maximal-deviation method was more highly
correlated with performance than the lactate threshold values determined by other methods (Bishop,
Correspondence: Fabiana Andrade Machado, State University of Maringa, Department of Physical Education, Av.Colombo, 5790, Block M 06, Maringa,
87020900 Brazil. E-mail:famachado_uem@hotmail.com
ISSN 0264-0414 print/ISSN 1466-447X online 2012 Taylor & Francis
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.702424
1268
F. A. Machado et al.
Methods
Participants
Sixteen non-competitive, recreational female runners
of local standard with a minimum of two years of
training experience volunteered to take part in this
study. Of these, 13 completed the entire study and
10 were included for analysis. The 10-km running
times of the participants were between 45 and
65 min, with a pace between 2.5 and 3.5 m s71
(*4560% of the world record). Characteristics of
the participants (n 16) were age 42.2 + 7.5 years,
stature 1.63 + 0.03 m, body mass 57.3 + 6.6 kg,
LAs a b expc s
1269
Figure 1. Lactate threshold determined by the maximal-deviation method from the exponential-plus-constant (left) and third-order
polynomial (right) models for one participant. The calculated lactate threshold was different for the same data: 3.4 m s71 (exponentialplus-constant) and 3.2 m s71 (third-order polynomial).
1270
F. A. Machado et al.
D LAfinal LAinitial =sf si
1271
Table I. Relationship between the lactate threshold using the maximal-deviation method and 10-km road-race performance (n 10)
Exponential
Protocol
All the coordinates
Exclusion of the
first point
Exclusion of the
first and second points
Polynomial
Lactate threshold
(m s71)
SEE
(m s71)
SEE (%)
Lactate threshold
(m s71)
SEE
(m s71)
SEE
(%)
3.11 + 0.21{
3.20 + 0.20{{
0.98**
0.99**
0.05
0.04
1.5%
1.3%
2.96 + 0.30
2.98 + 0.30
0.89**
0.89**
0.10
0.10
3.4%
3.4%
3.28 + 0.18{{{
0.98**
0.04
1.3%
3.07 + 0.29#
0.83*
0.13
4.2%
Note: r, Pearsons correlation coefficient; SEE, standard error of estimate; SEE (%), standard error of estimate expressed as a percentage of
mean speed for the road race; {P 5 0.05 for the polynomial (using all the coordinates); {{P 5 0.05 for the exponential (using all the
coordinates) and polynomial (excluding the first point); {{{P 5 0.05 for the exponential (using all the coordinates and excluding the first
point) and polynomial (excluding the first and second points); #P 5 0.05 for the polynomial (using all the coordinates and excluding the
first point); *Statistical significance is P 5 0.01; **Statistical significance is P 5 0.001.
indicating high inter-correlation between the exponential lactate threshold indices. The inter-correlation between the polynomial lactate threshold indices
was high (0.96 r 0.98; P 5 0.001) but slightly
smaller than the inter-correlation between the
exponential lactate threshold indices. The correlations between exponential and polynomial lactate
threshold using all the coordinates (r 0.88;
P 5 0.001), excluding the first point (r 0.89;
P 5 0.001) and excluding the first and second
points (r 0.81; P 5 0.01) were not as high as the
intra-modelling method indices. The absolute and
relative technical errors of measurement between
exponential- and polynomial-derived lactate thresholds using all the coordinates (0.15 m s71; 4.9%),
excluding the first point (0.18 m s71; 5.9%) and
excluding the first and second points (0.19 m s71;
6.1%) were greater than the coefficient of variation
(CV) of the maximal-deviation method reported by
Morton, Stannard, and Kay (2012) during incremental exercises on a cycle ergometer (CV 3.8%).
Figure 2 illustrates the relationships between 10-km
road-race performance lactate threshold for the
exponential-plus-constant (left) and third-order polynomial (right) regression equations. The relationship
(left) was systematically shifted to the right when the
initial points were excluded, but the correlation
between road-race performance and the exponential
lactate threshold remained practically unchanged.
The relationship (right) was also shifted to the right
for the third-order polynomial equation, but the
points were not as clustered around the regression
line as for the 10-km road-race performance and
exponential lactate threshold relationship (left).
Discussion
The major findings of this study were that the
polynomial lactate threshold underestimated the
equivalent exponentially-determined lactate threshold
1272
F. A. Machado et al.
Figure 2. Plots of 10-km road-race performance versus lactate threshold estimated by the maximal-deviation method indices from the
exponential-plus-constant (left) and third-order polynomial (right) models (n 10).
1273
1274
F. A. Machado et al.