Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
h i g h l i g h t s
" The corrosion resistance of self-compacting concrete (SCC) has not been investigated yet.
" In the reported study the corrosion resistance of SCC incorporating quarry dust powder, silica fume and y ash was studied.
" The chloride permeability of the developed SCC was low to moderate and the corrosion resistance was high.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 20 March 2012
Received in revised form 10 July 2012
Accepted 22 July 2012
Available online 3 September 2012
Keywords:
Self-compacting concrete
Quarry dust powder
Reinforcement corrosion
Chloride permeability
Coefcient of chloride diffusion
a b s t r a c t
This paper presents the results of a study conducted to evaluate the corrosion resistance of self-compacting concrete (SCC) prepared using quarry dust powder (QDP), silica fume (SF) plus QDP or y ash (FA).
SCC specimens were prepared and tested for corrosion resistance, chloride permeability and chloride diffusion. The results indicated that the time to initiation of reinforcement corrosion in M4 (8% QDP plus 5%
SF and w/c = 0.4) specimens and M2 (8% QDP and w/c = 0.38) specimens was more than that in M5 (30%
FA and w/c = 0.4) specimens. The corrosion current density on steel in the SCC specimens was very low in
the initial stage of exposure to 5% NaCl solution and it increased with increasing period of exposure. Corrosion activation was noted on steel in M1, M3, and M5 specimens. However, it was not noted in M2 and
M4 specimens even after 990 days (33 months) of exposure. The chloride permeability in SCC specimens
incorporating QDP or FA was moderate and it was low in the specimens incorporating QDP plus SF. The
lowest diffusion coefcient was noted in M2 specimens while it was the highest in M5 specimens.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Self compacting concrete (SCC) represents one of the most outstanding developments in concrete technology. Due to its ability to
compact itself by means of its own weight without the requirement of vibration, it contributes to a signicant improvement in
the quality of concrete. Furthermore, it signicantly reduces the
manpower required for the construction. The elimination of the
compaction work results in reduced costs of placement, a shortening of the construction time and improved productivity. The application of SCC also leads to a reduction of noise during casting,
better working conditions, and the possibility of reducing placing
time. Other advantages of SCC are improved homogeneity of the
concrete production and the excellent service quality without
blowholes or other surface defects [17].
278
2. Experimental program
2.1. Cement and llers
ASTM C 150 Type I Portland cement was utilized in all the concrete mixtures.
QDP, SF, and FA were used as llers. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of
Type I Portland cement, SF, FA, and QDP.
Passing (%)
19
9.5
4.75
2.36
100
30
10
0
90100
2055
010
05
2.2. Aggregates
Crushed limestone was used as coarse aggregate while dune sand was used as
ne aggregate. The specic gravity and absorption of the coarse and ne aggregates
are summarized in Table 2. The grading of coarse aggregates, as shown in Table 3,
conrmed to size #67 of ASTM C 33. Potable water was used for mixing the concrete
constituents.
The concrete ingredients were mixed in a revolving drum mixer for approximately ve to seven minutes to obtain a uniform consistency and owable
characteristics.
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
(M1):
(M2):
(M3):
(M4):
(M5):
The mixtures were prepared with a cementitious materials content of 400 kg/
m3 and effective water to cementitious materials ratio in the range of 0.380.40.
The coarse aggregate to total aggregate ratio was kept xed at 0.5 and the ne to
total aggregate ratio was in the range of 0.400.42 and the QDP was varied in the
range of 810% of the total aggregates. Silica fume was used as 5% replacement of
Type I Portland cement. Fly ash was used as 30% replacement of Type I Portland cement. The weights of constituents in each mixture are shown in Table 4.
Icorr
Table 1
Chemical composition of Type I Portland cement, silica fume, y ash, and quarry dust
powder.
B
Rp
ba bc
2:3ba bc
Constituent
(wt.%)
Type I
cement
Silica
fume
Fly
ash
Quarry dust
powder
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
K2O
Na2O
L.O.I
C3S
C2S
C3A
C4AF
19.92
6.54
2.09
64.7
1.84
2.61
0.56
0.28
0.73
55.9
19
7.5
9.8
90.68
0.66
0.23
0.15
0.20
0.13
0.14
5.23
64.13
30.01
11.79
2.17
0.68
45.7
1.80
where ba and bc are the anodic and cathodic Tafel constants, mV/decade,
respectively.
The Tafel constants are normally obtained by polarizing the steel to 250 mV of
the corrosion potential (Tafel plot). However, in the absence of sufcient data on ba
and bc, a value of B equal to 26 mV for steel in active condition and 52 mV for steel
in passive condition is often used [14]. Lambert et al. [15] reported a good correlation between corrosion rates determined using these values and the gravimetric
weight loss method. A good correlation between the LPR and gravimetric weight
loss was also noted by Al-Amoudi et al. [16].
2.94
1.91
0.95
1.10
0.84
1.72
35.10
Table 2
Absorption and specic gravity of coarse and ne aggregates.
Aggregate
Absorption (%)
Coarse (limestone)
Fine (dune sand)
1.1
0.6
2.60
2.56
279
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
0.40
0.38
0.40
0.40
0.40
Cement
Silica fume
Fly ash
Coarse aggregate
Fine aggregate
Plasticizer
Stabilizer
400
400
400
380
280
139.2
140.8
171.2
140.3
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
120
870.2
880.0
842.3
876.9
974.9
731.0
739.2
684.8
736.6
974.9
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.8
1.1
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Q s Q x 95=x2
The chloride permeability was determined after curing the specimens for
28 days. After curing, a 50 mm thick disk was cut from the center of a
75 150 mm specimen. The cut specimens were coated with an epoxy resin on
the curved surface to avoid moisture evaporation during testing. They were then
vacuum saturated and clamped between two cells. The upstream cell (cathode)
was lled with 3% sodium chloride solution and the downstream (anode) cell
was lled with 0.3 M sodium hydroxide solution. The cells were connected to a rectier and a potential of 60 V DC was applied. The current owing in the electric circuit was monitored through a resistor after every 30 min for a period of 6 h. The
total charge passed through the specimen was determined from the timecurrent
plot. Since a 75 mm nominal diameter specimen was used, the test results were adjusted using the following relationship given in ASTM C 1202:
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
M1
-200
M2
M3
-100
M4
M5
0
where Qs is the charge passed through a 95 mm diameter specimen, Qx is the charge
passed in a non-standard specimen of diameter, x (in this study x is 75 mm).
3. Results
3.1. Corrosion potentials
The variation of corrosion potentials with time on steel in all the
SCC specimens exposed to 5% NaCl solution is plotted against the
period of exposure in Fig. 2. The corrosion potentials on steel in
M1 (8% QDP and w/c ratio of 0.40) specimens decreased with the
period of exposure. However, after about 90 days of exposure,
the corrosion potentials tended to be stable. The timecorrosion
potentials curve crossed the ASTM C 876 threshold value of
270 mV SCE which represents the time to initiation of reinforcement corrosion in the steel bars after about 35 days of exposure.
The corrosion potentials on steel in M2 (8% QDP and w/c = 0.38)
specimens also decreased with the period of exposure. The time
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
280
Table 5
Time to initiation of reinforcement corrosion.
Table 6
Chloride permeability of SCC specimens after 28 days of water curing.
Time to initiation of
reinforcement corrosion (days)
Mix
#
Mix details
Chloride
permeability (C)
Chloride permeability
classication
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
35
230
130
350
20
M1
M2
M3
1923
1615
1793
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
969
Low
1096
Moderate
M4
M5
0.60
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
0.50
0.40
0.30
The corrosion current density on steel in the SCC specimens exposed to 5% NaCl solution is plotted against the period of exposure
in Fig. 3. The corrosion current density on steel in M1 specimens
was very low in the initial stages of exposure and it increased with
increasing period of exposure. The corrosion current density after
990 days (33 months) of exposure was 0.70 A/cm2. The corrosion
current density on steel in M2 specimens did not increase signicantly with the period of exposure, in these specimens, the corrosion current density was low (less than 0.3 A/cm2) which means
that the steel bars in these specimens were still in a passive state
even after 990 days (33 months) of exposure. The corrosion current
density on steel in the M3 specimens was low in the initial stages
of exposure. However, it increased rapidly up to 200 days of exposure, thereafter, it continued to increase linearly with period of
exposure and it was the maximum among all specimens. The corrosion current density after about 990 days (33 months) of exposure to 5% NaCl solution was 0.90 A/cm2. The corrosion current
density on steel in the M4 specimens also increased with the period of exposure, but the increase was not that signicant. The corrosion current density after 990 days (33 months) of exposure was
less than 0.3 A/cm2 which means that the steel bars in these specimens were still in a passive condition. The corrosion current density on steel in the M5 specimens increased rapidly up to 150 days
of exposure and thereafter it was stable up to 400 days, and then
increased again. The corrosion current density after 990 days
(33 months) of exposure was 0.63 A/cm2.
1.00
0.80
M1
M2
M3
0.70
M4
M5
0.90
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
Depth, cm
Fig. 4. Chloride prole in all SCC specimens.
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
Table 7
Coefcient of chloride diffusion for SCC specimens.
0.20
0.10
0.00
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Mix number
Coefcient of chloride
diffusion (108 cm2/s)
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
8.165
8.015
8.735
9.785
10.88
281
282
[22] Zhu W, Gibbs JC. Use of different limestone and chalk powders in selfcompacting concrete. J Cem Concr Res 2005;35:145762.
[23] Bosiljkov VB. SCC mixes poorly graded aggregate and high volume of
limestone ller. J Cem Concr Res 2003;33:127986.
[24] Xie Y, Liu B, Yin J, Zhou S. Optimum mix parameters of high-strength selfcompacting concrete with ultrapulverized y ash. J Cem Concr Res
2002;32:47780.