Você está na página 1de 15

1.

Trademark-IAS: when quality @ a premium


Internal Condition of the newly-independent America
A treaty signed on 3rd September, 1783 at Paris recognized the independence of the colonies
of the American Union. The American Congress was elected in 1789 in accordance with the
new Constitution and it unanimously declared George Washington the first President of
America. He had to face a number of difficulties in building a new nation. At this time
America had neither money nor a residence for the President or a suitable building for
holding the meetings of the Congress. The position of the Federal government was also
precarious. This new Union was not supported by all sections of society. A powerful
minority in the states which had accepted the Constitution still opposed the Union. North
Carolina and Rhodes Island had not yet joined the union.
The states of the Union nursed a feeling of mutual rivalry; they differed geographically and
economically. The northern states were well-endowed with natural resources but the
southern states were backward and in a semi-civilized state. They were marked by social
inequality and the problem of slavery worsened the class differences.
Thus, the newly independent America faced the problems of economic, social and political
inequality, which demanded an immediate solution. Though America had a number of
internal and external problems, it has been a characteristic feature of its history that it has
made unobstructed progress since its inception. Except for the War of 1812, with Britain and
Civil war of 1861, no devastating war has been fought on the soil of America. However, it
cannot be denied that the Civil War interrupted Americas progress for four years. America
suffered heavy financial and military losses during this period.
Regional Interests of the States
During the early nineteenth century, the American federation was weak and each state
clamoured for its own regional interests. At the root of the struggle between the Northern
and Southern states were the economic interests. Merchants and industrialists dominated the
Northern states while the majority of the people in the south owned orchards and those in the
west owned farms. They all wanted to influence the policy of the Federal government in
their own favour. As none of these sectors was powerful, each tried to strike a bargain with

his rival. The main controversy revolved round tariff, internal reforms and policy regarding
government land, money and banking. The states in the north and the north-west of America
wanted to raise money through protective tariff and use it for internal reforms. The northern
states wanted to put an embargo on the sale of government land to check the migration of
labour to west. All this added to the complexity of the political forum. Actually, the
American federation was a union of reluctant states whose requirements had forced them to
stay together. The members of the Congress could not have a bill passed unless they had
compromised with rival interests. This state of affairs could not continue for long and
ultimately America plunged into a Civil War from which emerged a strong organization
which continues steadily even today.
Slavery in America and its form
Slavery in America began when the first African slaves were brought to the North American
colony of Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619, to aid in the production of such lucrative crops as
tobacco. Slavery was practiced throughout the American colonies in the 17th and 18th
centuries, and African-American slaves helped build the economic foundations of the new
nation. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 solidified the central importance of slavery to
the Souths economy. By the mid-19th century, Americas westward expansion, along with a
growing abolition movement in the North, would provoke a great debate over slavery that
would tear the nation apart in the bloody American Civil War (1861-65). Though the Union
victory freed the nations 4 million slaves, the legacy of slavery continued to influence
American history, from the tumultuous years of Reconstruction (1865-77) to the civil rights
movement that emerged in the 1960s, a century after emancipation.
In the early 17th century, European settlers in North America turned to African slaves as a
cheaper, more plentiful labour source than indentured servants (who were mostly poorer
Europeans). After 1619, when a Dutch ship brought 20 Africans ashore at the British colony
of Jamestown, Virginia, slavery spread throughout the American colonies. Though it is
impossible to give accurate figures, some historians have estimated that 6 to 7 million slaves
were imported to the New World during the 18th century alone, depriving the African
continent of some of its healthiest and ablest men and women.

Did You Know?


One of the first martyrs to the cause of American patriotism was Crispus Attucks, a
former slave who was killed by British soldiers during the Boston Massacre of 1770.
Some 5,000 black soldiers and sailors fought on the American side during the
Revolutionary War.
The Constitution of America declares that all men are born equal but this applies
to the white and not to the blacks. Slavery had begun in American Colonies two
hundred years before it declared itself an independent nation. The first known slave
trade was Dutchman of Warre who sold twenty Negro slaves in Jamestown. So
many African Negro slaves had been imported to America between the 16th and the
19th centuries that each European Christian had a Negro slave for cutting wood and
fetching water. This trade of selling Africans as slaves in America was very
profitable. The slave trade expanded and the English, the Spanish and the Portuguese
traders earned a lot in it. Special types of ships were designed for transporting slaves.
This made Liverpool a big city as fifteen of its ships were designed for transporting
slaves. This made Liverpool a big city as 15 of its ships were engaged in this trade.
Their number rose to 132 by 1792. In the early years of the Industrial Revolution the
spinning industry made a record progress in Lancashire and this led to an increased
demand for slaves in the U./S.A., for the cotton used in Lancashire Mills came from
large Cotton farms in the Southern States of America. America had 6 million slaves
in 1790. England had abolished slavery in 1771, but no serious measures were taken
to curb this flourishing trade. The principle implied in the Declaration of American
Independence struck at the roots of slavery. The Northern states led an anti-slavery
campaign and urged all the states to implement the Declaration. One of the forms of
anti-slavery campaign was that if a slave tried to escape from his master, he was
taken by night to a safe place in the north or to Canada across the border. During the
fourth decade of the century a network of secret routes had been laid down in all
parts of the north for these run-away slaves. It was known as the underground
railroad. This activity was carried out very successfully in north-western regions.
Between 1830 and 1860, Ohio alone helped more than forty thousand slaves to free
themselves in this way. Slavery had become part and parcel of life in the southern
state. The slave-owners here spurned anti-slavery feelings. It became a controversial
question between the north and the south. The Southerners treated slaves as personal

property but the Northerner considered it a slur on humanity. Undoubtedly, slavery


had many drawbacks which both its opponents and slave-owners criticised
vehemently. The members of one family were sold in the market to different people,
which annihilated the institution of family. This was a very pitiable and heartrending scene. After 1830 the question of slavery rose as a national problem. On the
one hand the demand for slaves increased and on the other the anti-slavery
movement gained strength. Literary effusions also underline the question of slavery.
Poets like Hittier Lowell Briant, Emerson and Longfellow powerfully expressed
anti-slavery sentiments. Newspapers propagated the stories of atrocious, repressive,
cruel and inhuman treatment of the slaves. By 1840 the American Anti-slavery
society had two thousand branches all other the country and two lakh members.
The Southerners drove the anti-slavery campaigners out of their territory. It was
dangerous there to oppose slavery in newspapers or in public meetings. The
supporters of slavery asserted that in every society one section or the other has to do
physical labour. For cultural and economic development we need a section which
does not shun labour. In this situation the American society would have to opt either
the labour-dependent northern society or the slave-dependent southern society. They
argued that slavery was comparatively a safe and permanent institution immune from
labour organizations, strikes and class difference. Moreover, as compared to northern
producers the slave owners of south provided more facilities to their slaves. On the
basis of this mentality and these arguments, the southerners justified slavery.
Efforts were made to sort out the differences that had cropped upon between the
northern and southern States on the question of slavery. Senator Henry Clay made
several significant proposals. In September, 1850 the Congress made five laws in
this regard. Out of these the law to abolish slave trade in the District of Columbia
and the Fugitive Slave Law are very important. The Fugitive Slave Law was very
strict. Under it the officers of the Union were required to arrest fugitive slaves and to
prosecute them before the court for punishment. The slaves had no right to plead
their case before the court. The courts accepted what their owners said. This strict
implementation of Slave Law aggravated the controversy instead of alleviating it.

The controversy had two aspects economic and welfare. The southern states stood
for the first because the abolition of slavery would strike at the root of their
prosperity. Their agriculture which brought them happiness and prosperity depended
on slaves. Who can easily sacrifice his own interests? Moreover, the inhabitants of
these states did not start this system, they had inherited it from the Spaniards. The
English had just supported and accepted it. Their economic, political and selfinterests so inter-twined with each other that it became impossible to separate them.
On one side was the abolition of slavery and on the other was the threat of the
dissolution of the Confederation.
The Northern states, though not fully inspired by humanitarian and welfare motives,
had some vestige of pity and supported abolition of slavery as a matter of policy and
interest. They sheltered and helped the fugitive slaves. They were not only
indifferent to the implementation of the Fugitive Slave Law but were eager for its
repeal. They directed the slaves who had escaped punishment towards Canada. They
also used another method known as underground rail road. They had marked places
where the fugitive slaves could assemble. These were called stations. The slaves
were taken from one station to another and set free. This caused loss of property to
the slave owners. The atrocities perpetrated under the Fugitive Slave Law inspired
Mrs. Harriat Beecher Stowe to write a novel entitled Uncle Toms Cabin which
described the system of slavery so realistically that the atrocious treatment of the
slaves filled the people of both north and south with abhorrence.

The work done by this book in arousing public opinion against slavery was far
greater than what had been done through thousands of meetings, speeches and
pamphlets. This book was translated into several languages and sold 3 lakh copies in
the first year of its publication. When it was transformed into a play, the audiences
were horrified. Mrs. Stowe showed the atrocities could not be separated from slavery
and a free society was greatly different from a slave-ridden one. Until now slavery
was criticised on the basis of abstract arguments but the characters in the play

presented it in a living form. Among the persons who had been working against
slavery at this time, the most prominent was Abraham Lincoln.
Causes of the Civil War
There had been a long tradition of struggle between the northern and southern states
of America. Differences between the Union and the Confederation arose in 1787 Economic
values aggravated these differences in the 19th century. There were acute differences in Union
politics between 1820 and 1830. The question of slavery caused a bitter controversy between
the north and the south for the first time in 1820. Consequently, the Missouri treaty was
signed. Although this treaty kept slavery away from the north-west yet it signified victory for
the south at that time. Then came the question of the merger of Texas in the Union. The south
wanted to make it a member of the Confederation, but the north opposed it. Finally, Texas
joined the Union as a state which approved slavery. The Mexican war contributed to widen
the rift between the north and the sough. It aimed at capturing the slave territory. The people
of California wanted independence for their state. Under a treaty signed in 1850, it was
declared independent. After 1848 it became a decisive factor in the political conditions. This
conflict developed unto the civil war. The factors responsible for this are as follows.
1. Economic Disparity There was economic disparity between the states of the north
and the south right from the beginning. In 1861 the north was in a better condition
than the south. Out of the 34 states of the Union, 23 belonged to the north. About
two-thirds of the population lived in the north where the number of Negros was vry
small. The 9.5 million population of the South consisted of 3.5 million slaves who
could not be used in war. Out of 30,000 miles of rail-roads about 20,000 were in the
north. Most of the American mines, banks and industries were in the north so it could
easily ge the supply of war materials during the period of Civil War. Industries
dominated the north. Large industries were rapidly developing there. They
manufactured cotton textiles, woollen clothes, shoes, leather goods and wooden
articles on a large scale. These industries used machines and slaves ere not required
here for economic progress. If the north enjoyed all these advantages, the south
performed better in other spheres. In the early year of the Civil war many people in
the border- states supported the confederation which raised its army equal in strength
to that of the Union. The soldiers in the south were fighting under the inspiration that

they were defending their rights and their homes from the north invaders. As against
the north, the basis of the economic life of the south was agriculture. Agriculture was
not mechanised and no proper implements had been developed till then. So the
farmers depended on the labour of their slaves. Cotton, sugar-cane and tobacco were
grown on a large scale in the south and slaves worked there as labourers. The society
in the south was fully dependent on slaves. So they were against the abolition of
slavery. These differences caused variance in their economic interests and there was a
state of conflict on the question of customs and tariff since 1830. Motivated by its
own interest no state relished the central interference. There were two political parties
in the country. One party advocated sovereignty for each state, while the other
pleaded for a strong centre. European immigrants saw more possibilities of profit in
north. In 1860 there were only 13% immigrants and 10% American industries in the
south. Though the south possessed other natural wealth, it could not generate capital
till cotton dominated there. In these conditions other trades, labourers and commerce
failed to get any encouragement there and in the social organization of the south only
the rural farming class could develop. This economic disparity caused differences in
economy, philosophy, political thinking and social stratification in the states of the
north and the south. To end this disparity, Abraham Lincoln decided to participate in
the Civil War and strengthen the Union.
2. Slavery Although the system of slavery involved a moral question for the north, for
the south it was especially related to their economic interests. So they were very
sensitive to it. The controversy over the system of slavery was very old and it was
both a direct and an indirect cause of the Civil War. But it is partially true. It cannot
be separated from the desire to acquire supremacy over the Union, but Prof. Elson
believes that every cause of the Civil War had its root in slavery. To defend this
abominable institution, the slave owners offered many constitutional comments
regarding the sovereignty of the state, dissociated from the Union and committed
deeds which caused suspicion and resentment in the heart of northerners. By the end
of the eighteenth century the common people in America had begun to disparage
slave trade. In the north, slave trading was abolished up to the southern boundary of
Pennsylvania. This boundary was known as Mason-Dickson Line. In the new
territory west of Alignese and north of river Ohio, slavery had been abolished under
the ordinance of 1787. It was also gradually dying out in the south, but here it was
being achieved through a change of heart and not through legislation. In the

meantime development of industries made slave trade very profitable and now no one
was willing to give up this lucrative trade. Gradually slavery became a very
complicated issue in American politics.
In the draft resolution of the Declaration of Independence, there was a clause that
the slave trade was a crime, but later on it was removed to honour the desire of the
southern states of Carolina and Georgia. Although the ordinance of 1787 had
abolished slavery in the whole territory north of river Ohio, it provided that the
fugitive slaves could be arrested. Perhaps the founding fathers of the American
Constitution had compromised on the question of slavery obeying the needs of the
hour. The constitution agreed to grant to the Negro slaves the right to participate in
the State Assembly-elections but confined it to 3/5 of the total slave population of the
state. After the Missouri Agreement (1820) slave trade continued for thirty years
more. By 1850 the number of slaves had reached 3.5 million. The Fugitive Slave Law
was enacted in 1850, but the northern states opposed it. Four years later, the south
achieved a great victory by cancelling the Missouri Agreement through the KansasNebraska Legislation.
Thus the American states in the north and the south did not see eye to eye on the
question of slavery. The northern states considered it a disgrace for the society,
whereas the southern states considered it a necessary evil which could not be cast
aside. Neither party was willing to compromise. Some scholars are of the opinion that
through slave trade America wanted to extend its boundary in the west. So, all the
attempts for an agreement on the slave trade failed. Ridiculing the growing influence
of slavery, the poets and journalists said that the light of the stars and the red beams
of the dawn should be wiped off the American flag and whips and shackles should be
painted on it. From the above facts, two conclusions can be drawn (i) for a long
time before the Civil War, the government had been under the sway of slaveowners, and (ii) the people on the whole had no sympathies with them.

November 8, 1863
3.

Election of Abraham Lincoln:

The election of Abraham Lincoln was an important landmark in the history of America. He entered
the office of the President on March 4, 1861. His election signified that the days of slavery were

now numbered. In the election of 1860, disruption in the Democratic Party paved way for the grand
success of Lincoln, the Republican candidate, but in its election campaign the Republican P:arty had
highlighted issues other than slavery. Lincoln once said : I dont want to interfere in the state of
slavery in which it is today. If I got all the moral rights and powers, I would like to know how I could
use this state of slavery. In the Civil war, the main aim of Lincoln was to defend the Union whereas
the states of the south separated from the union to preserve slavery. Lincoln succeeded with a
thundering majority, and the southern states were filled with the apprehension that new
government would put an end to their institutions and specific civilization. This instigated them to
secede from the Union.
The northern states were determined to safeguard the union because of their economic interests. If
the southern confederation established close trade relations with England, the northern states
would lost a very profitable market for their goods. Therefore, for the defence of Union, Lincoln
received more support from the farmers of Middle West than the merchants of north east.

4. Atmosphere of fear created by the political propaganda


The opponents of slavery had caused panic by propagating that the north would do away
with the historical labour system of the south. Most of the criticism of the southerners
made by the leaders of the northern states was selfish, impractical and humiliating. This
created in the south an atmosphere of apprehension, fear, hatred and resentment. On the
other hand efforts made by the Southerners for the expansion of slavery alarmed even
people like Lincoln in the north lest this system should spread all over the country. In the
beginning of 1857, Roger Brooke Taney,5th Chief Justice of Supreme Court gave a
majority verdict in the case of Dred Scott that the Congress had no right to abolish
slavery in the states. This interpretation of the Constitution was not in the interest of the
national unity. It roused great controversy throughout America. Seven public discussions
were held between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas on the political aspects of
slavery, which were widely acclaimed Douglas strongly asserted that he was indifferent
towards slavery and supported the principle of public authority as the only means of
ending tension between the groups. Answering the challenging questions, Lincoln in a
speech at Freeport emphasised that in spite of the Dred Scott decision, any region could
have slavery Lincoln stressed that the question of slavery had to be solved once for all,
whether its results were favourable or unfavourable. To put it off or its solution through
agreements was not good. Accepting his nomination for the senate, in a speech he said,
This government where half the states are free from slavery cannot be permanent. The
movement will continue till the crisis is reached and got over. Lincoln considered the
institution of slavery morally, socially and politically unsound. Douglas overlooked the
question of morality and accepted the Freeport Principle according to which the question
of slavery fell under the state constitution. This principle was criticised in the South. It
created an atmosphere which made civil war inevitable.
5. Mistakes of the Slave Owners

The greatest mistake made by the slave owners was that they started the Civil War
and attempted to break the Union. This misadventure proved to be a deplorable
blunder. The Constitution and the politicians from the north had so far been shielding
the slave-owners, but now they disregarded the Constitution andc broke up with
friends in the north. Now this case reached the final court the public. Before
breaking away from the Union and starting the war, the slave owners must have
realized that the north was more powerful, feelings for a federation were very strong
and it was not easy to get recognition and aid from foreign countries. Some people
thought that being the largest cotton growers in the world, the southern states would
have many advantages. Britain which depended on them for cotton would support
them. Soon the ensuing events proved them wrong in their calculations. Like the
cotton from the south, Britain needed wheat from the north. Some other, thought that
by temporarily braking away from the union, the southerners would be able to strike
a deal with the4 north on favourable terms. But this was a wrong assessment of the
situation.
6. Separation of the Cotton growing States from the Union
The news of Lincolns victory was a bolt from the blue for the southerners, as many
of their leaders had already decided before the election that they would not remain in
the Union under a Republican President. The first step in this direction was taken by
Carolina. It declared secession from the Union on December 20, 1860. In its
declaration, it said that the laws granting personal freedom passed by the 13 states of
the north were against the spirit of the Constitution. The anti-slavery movement in
the north had endangered their personal property, the slaves and high customs and
tariff rates imposed on the south were meant to benefit the north. When Lincoln
entered the Presidents office on March 4, 1861, seven states of the south had already
seceded from the Union. They formed a southern confederacy on February 4, 1861
and elected Jafferson Davis their President and Alexander H. Stephens vicepresident. In place of the stars and stripes it adopted a flag with a palm tree. Like the
constitution of the United States, they made a separate constitution for the
confederacy which recognized complete sovereignty of the federating units and
accepted in clear cut terms their right to secede from the confederacy. Now the
eruption of the volcano was at hand. Though Confederacy had been formed in 1861
many states which supported slavery had not dissociated from the old Union. The
northern states had a mixed response towards the formation of the Confederacy.
Further President Buchanan held the view that though withdrawal from the Union
was unconstitutional, any state could not be forced to remain in the Union against its
will. Most of the people in the northern state were against using force against the
members of the Confederacy. Lincoln had determined to save the Union at any cost.
After his election as President, he made an immaculate declaration that the federation
formed under the name of United States of America was incontestable and
imperishable and it would not be allowed to disintegrate in any manner whatsoever.
He assured the southern states that he would not interfere in the system of slavery

prevalent there. Lincolns speech fell flat on the states of the Confederacy. To subdue
the insurgent states he organized a voluntary militia. The rebellious states also
gathered force for their defence and a war broke out between the two parties.
Failure of Attempts at Compromise
The secession of the seven states of the south from the Union posed a serious
problem for the existence of the United States. The founding fathers of the American
Constitution had not given any state the right to secede from the Union because they
wished to keep it intact. Several meetings were held at New York, Boston and
Philadelphia to reach an agreement. Sentiments for compromise were expressed in
these meetings. Anti-slavery statements were checked and criticism of slavery in
public meetings, news papers and other forums was banned, so that the southerners
might develop an attitude of compromise. The people preferred the old system of
government to waging a war or dissolving the union, so innumedrable anti-Lincoln
resolutions were passed. Besides these meetings, Virginia convened a peace congress
at Washington. Eminent representatives of all the southern states of the union and
most of the northern statges attended the congress. After a deliberation for threeweeks it sent its recommendations to the Congress, but they did not attract any
notice. On December 18, 1860, senator Cretendon presented to the senate a proposal
for agreement. A committee of 13 members was appointed two days later to consider
it. The committee said that the Congress had no power to interfere in the system of
slavery in any state or region south of 36 o 30 o latitude. This proposal might be
included in the Constitution as an amendment and it should not be further amended in
future. The Republican Party voted against it and it fell through. At this time a
committee of 33 members of House of Representatives was also trying to work out
an agreement. All the above attempts toreach an agreement fell through because of
anti-Union attitude of the southern states, the Civil War could no longer be kept off.
Beginning of the CIVIL WAR

Hostilities began on April 12, 1861, when Confederate forces fired


upon Fort Sumter, a key fort held by Union troops in South Carolina. Now
Lincoln was forced to take up arms to defend the disintegrating Union. He
feared that if he showed any impetuosity in taking up arms, the remaining
eight states which supported slavery might join the southern confederacy.
His Cabinet failed to help him reach a final decision. At last on April 6,
1861 he ordered to send re-inforcement forces to the Pckens and Sumter
Forts. On April 15, 1861 he organized a Civil militia of 75 thousand
citizens and posted it for the implementation of the Union laws and to
barricade the coasts of the Confederacy. Very few people had imagined the
gravity and fierceness of the forthcoming struggle. It became necessary for
the eight independent states to join either of the two parties. Four states
Virginia, North Caroline, Tennessee and Kansas decided to join the
southern confederacy whereas the remaining four states Maryland,

Delaware, Kentucky and Missouri joined the old Union. The capital of
the Union government was shifted from Montgomery to Richmond, 100
miles away from Washington. This war between north and south America
which started on April 12, 1861concluded on May 26, 1865 ( i.e. 4 years, 3
weeks and 6 days - last shot fired June 22, 1865).
In the history of America, this war is known by two names. The northern states called it a
great rebellion and the southern states called it the War of states. We call it Civil War
because it was fought between two sections of the American people.
War Time Resources of the Two Parties
Before going into the details of this war, it will be in the fitness of things to compare the
conditions of the north and the south. When the War began both had made a wrong
estimate of the power of the other party and so both were hopeful of their victory. But the
War continued for four years and concluded only when the people of the south wee fed
up with it.
In the beginning of the War the north was in a strong position. According to the census
of 1860 the population of the northern states was 2.3 million, whereas that of the 11
southern states was 9 million of which 3.5 million were slaves. This made the north more
powerful. The north had 22,000 miles of rail-road system, whereas the south had only
9000 miles. The north enjoyed a better position because of its industrial development and
the production in New York and Pennsylvania equalled that of the whole south. For the
purpose of collecting and organizing the army, the north started civil militia and other
programmes of recruitment. In July 1861, to make the military services attractive an
additional pay of ( $ 100 ) was announced. It was raised in 1863 to $ 302 for new recruits
and $ 402 for the veterans. As a result of this policy during the last quarter of the war 2
million soldiers from the north and 8 millions from the south were fighting. After 1862
the north had started the manufacture of all its war equipment. Industries and
transportation system were in a flourishing state in the north. Their economic condition
was sound. Rail and road transport system made a great contribution towards carrying
food supplies from one place to another. They had good trade and diplomatic relations
with foreigners. Due to diplomatic efficiency of the Lincoln government, the southern
Confederacy could not establish relations with foreign governments. Hence no foreign
government recognized it. Otherwise the barricade of southern ports could be broken in
an hour and then the south could have procured its desired food supplies, clothing and
arms for the war in exchange for its cotton. Thus the profusion of army, transport,
communication and food supplies provided the northern states stability in war. However,
the south also enjoyed certain advantages. There was great unity among the states
professing slavery. Three million people in these states owned no slaves and took no
interest in slaves as property. Even then they joined their slave-owning neighbours in this
war. The southerners were trained soldiers and most of the slave-owners were proficient
in horse riding and the use of fire-arms. They fought on their own ground and could
enlist the sympathy and support of the people.

For raising an army, the south also planned Civil Militia and used conscription. People
between the ages of 18 and 45 were conscripted into the army of the Confederacy. Even
then they could muster the strength of 8 million soldiers. Places in the south were far
apart which raised the expenses of transportation. They lacked naval power and could
defend their coast and ports with difficulty. As the northern states had barricaded the
southern ports they could not easily get foreign aid. There was scarcity of essential
goods. In the words of Novins and Comegar, we can conclude about the two rivals that
from all points of view the people of the north were far stronger than those of the south,
but the chances of the victory of the south were based on the ground that it would be
difficult to vanquish such a vast area and its discontented people.
The Attitude of Other European States during the Civil War.
In the aperture of the Civil War, the administration in England and France let their
support to the Confederacy but public opinion in these countries was divided on this
issue. Most of the people considered it a fight between slavery and independence and
sympathised with the north. The southern states expected that England and France would
support the Confederacy to get cotton. Barricading of the southern ports caused crisis for
the British textile mills, but the public feelings were still in favour of the north. The
incidents of Trent and Albama also created differences between England and the
Confederacy, but these differences were soon clarified. The question here arises: Why
did England not, in spite of favourable conditions, come forward in support of
Confederacy? There may be two reasons: First, both the north and the south had appealed
to England to help them. The government could not take a decision in a hurry before
considering all the pros and cons. Secondly, signs of some commotion wee visible in
Europe itself. Tzar Alexander II had set the surfs (slave farmers) free (1861) and had
assured them help for buying land and building houses. Constitutional monarchy was set
up in Italy and in Prussia, William I had ascended the throne after the death of Fredrick
William IV Bismarck, a shrewd politician, was high right hand. Napoleon II of France
was also very ambitious. In these circumstances England faced the question whether it
would be wise for her to meddle in the conflict in a distant place. She thought it better to
remain neutral. It is true that the policy of barricading adopted by the north caused some
loss to British trade, but it was not large enough to arouse her to protest and invite
trouble for herself.
During the Civil War the southern states hoped that if they got recognition and aid from
foreign countries, it would help them in the war. They wanted to prepare England and
France to mediate and to help lift the barricade. The northern states believed that if there
was no external interference, they would vanquish the south. So they made all efforts to
stop foreign countries to grant recognition to the south. England and France exercised
great influence during the Civil War. Both these countries had fought against Russia in
the Crimean War and in a treaty they had agreed to follow England in all matters relating
to the United States of America. Russia, the third power in Europe at this time supported
the North America. This made the condition of the south deplorable.

In spite of army disparities between the two rivals the war protracted for four years.
During the first three years of the war, President Lincoln was the Chief Commander of
the military organization of the north. Right from the beginning he aimed at not capturing
the southern regions but at decimating the forces of the Confederacy. In 1864, U S Grant
was appointed Commander in Chief. The leadership of the forces of the Confederacy was
in the hands of those able generals who might he called the ablest generals of the United
States. The most important name among them was Robert E. Lee. Besides him, the other
commanders were Jackson, Albert Johnston, Georgif Johnson, George Bownek.
VARIOUS WAR FRONGS AND THE DEFEAT OF THE SOUTH
On April 12, 1861 South Carolina bombed the arsenal of the Union forces in the Sumter
Fort and put a match to the Civil War. The four important fronts of the war were: The
sea, the Misissipi Valley, Virginia and the states on the eastern coast and the diplomatic
field. In the beginning the Union navy consisted of 40 vessels but it was not wellorganized. Gidian Wales, the able minister for navy consolidated it and made it very
strong. The barricading of the southern coast imposed by Lincoln was weak in the early
years but by 1863 it became very effective and export of cotton to Europe completely
ceased; nor could the sough import arms and ammunition, cloth and medicines which it
badly needed.
At this time appeared David G. Faragat, the talented naval commander who mounted
two special attacks. In the first campaign be drove the northern fleet through the
Misissipi delta and crossing two strong forts forced New Orleans to surrender. In the
second campaign he crossed the fortified gate of the Mobile Bay and captured an
armoured vessel of the south and closed the port in 1862. The northern naval forces
destroyed Merrymank and Albama, the two battle ships of the south. Thus he established
complete supremacy over the sea and deprived the south of any foreign assistance.
The forces of the Union were victorious at many places in the Misissipi Valley. In the
early years of the war they broke the long linear entrenchment south of Tenessee and
easily captured the whole of western part of the state. They seized Memphis, an
important port of Misissipi and entered up to 200 miles in the territory of the
Confideracy. In 1863, General US grant or North achieved a significant victory. He laid
the seize of Vicksberg, moved downwards and held back the forces of the Confederacy
for six weeks. The northern forces captured Vicksberg the strongest fort in the south on
July 4. In connection with this victory, Lincoln said, Our great river is now going to
meet the sea unobstructed. The south was divided in two parts and it became difficult
for the states of the east to get food supplies from the fertile regions of Texas and
Arkansas across the river.
But in Virginia the northern forces met one defeat after another. Washington, the Capital
of North was only 100 miles away from Richmond (Virginia) the capital of the south.
But the territory between the two was crisis-crossed by many streams and there were

many places where one could seek shelter. Besides this, the south had two generals
Robert F. Lee and Thomas J (Stonewall) Jackson who were more ingenious than the
earlier generals of the north. They gave a tough fight to the forces of the north near
Richmond, the capital of the south. The south gained great success in this battle but lost
General Jackson and the right arm of General Lee. None of the southern victories was
decisive.
One important event occurred on January 1, 1863. President Lincoln made his famous
Declaration of Independent according to which all slaves had been set free and were
invited to join the forces of the Union. About one lakh fifty thousand Negro slaves joined
the northern army. The south realized the significance of this declaration and under the
force of war-time conditions released the slaves. Now the whole nation was absolved
from the taint of slavery and one of the objectives of the war was fulfilled.
In early 1864, Grant was sent towards the east. He defeated the forces of Lee in many
battles. Now the end of the war was clearly visible. Northern forces gained victory in the
battles of Pennsylvania, Vicksberg and Atlanta. Finally, on April 9, 1865, General Lee,
the commander of the southern forces surrendered to General Grant. Johnston
surrendered to Sherman on April 26 and the Civil War came to a close.
Assassination of Lincoln
On March 4, 1865 Lincoln started his second term as President. In his inaugural
speech, he used memorable words and called upon people to do what was just and
necessary to establish permanent peace. Lincoln made America a truly United States,
showed a new light by abolishing slavery and consolidated the political sys of America.
This great leader laid the foundation of that chapter in American history, after which the
nation ma forward on the path of progress. Unfortunately, the unpremeditated murder of
the creator of the historical unity of America, deprived him from seeing the realization of
his dream. John Viscus Booth shot him dead on April 14, 1865.
==================================================================
=

Você também pode gostar