Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Pergamon
W O O D PLASTIC COMPOSITE AT D I F F E R E N T U R E A
CONCENTRATIONS
M. M. H U S A I N , l M U B A R A K A. K H A N , 2 K. M. IDRISS ALI2t
and A. J. M. M O Y N U L H A S A N I
~Bangladesh Council and Scientificand Industrial Research, Dhaka and 2Radiation Chemistry Laboratory,
Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box 3787,
Dhaka, Bangladesh
INTRODUCTION
Wood Plastic Composite (WPC) can be suitably
prepared with low grade wood using a bulk monomer
under the radiation of a Co-60 gamma source. Low
density wood yields a better composite (Khan and
Ali, 1992a). Among various bulk monomers so far
used to prepare the composites, styrene (ST), methylmethacrylate (MMA), butylmethacrylate (BMA),
and acrylamide (AM) are important (Khan and Ali,
1993; Khan et al., 1992b). Incorporation of small
amounts (1%) of additives selected from functional
monomers, acid, inorganic salts and urea into the
monomer enhances the polymer loading significantly
for the composites with increased tensile strength in
most cases (Khan and Ali, 1992c). Acid decreases
the tensile property as it breaks the backbone chain
of the cellulose during composite formation. Li ions
retain the tensile property with enhanced polymer
loading while Cu 2 ions form some sort of organometallic complexes with the bulk monomer occupying
the void spaces in the wood cellulose providing a
slight increase of the tensile strength to the composite.
Most important is that Cu 2+ ions render protective
and preservative properties to the composite against
attack by insects and microbes. Carboamide
( ~ N - - - C O - - ) present in any bulk monomer or additive provides very significant enhancement of tensile
strength with substantial increase of the polymer
loading to the composite. A number of compounds
containing a carboamide ( ~ N - - C O - - ) group has
been used for the preparation of WPC (Ali et al.,
1994). Urea is the cheapest among these; similarly
tAuthor to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
EXPERIMENTAL
Simul (Salmalia malabarica) wood sample (6 1
x 0.5 cm) was selected from long, flat-grained planks
and was uniformly polished with suitable sandpapers.
Free water was removed from the samples by heating
them at 60C and 50 mm Hg for 24 h. Bulk monomers methylmethacrylate (MMA), butylmethacrylate
(BMA), styrene (ST) and acrylamide (AM) were
used as received from the supplier E. Merck without
removing the inhibitor. Urea, N-vinyl pyrrolidone
(NVP), tripropylene glycol diacrylate (TPGDA)
and trimethylol propane triacrylate (TMPTA) were
procured from Aldrich Chemical Co. and were also
used as additives without any further purification.
Impregnating solution was formulated with a bulk
monomer at different compositions with the swelling
solvent methanol. A minute amount (1%) of additive
was incorporated into the impregnating solution.
Dried wood samples were soaked into the impregnating solutions for 16 h under normal conditions. They
were then taken out of the solutions, wiped with tissue
paper to remove the excess solution, encapsulated
into polyethylene bags and were finally irradiated
with Co-60 gamma source at 3 Mrad (dose rate is
800 krad/h). The irradiated samples were heated at
623
624
M. M. Husain et al.
Table 1. Effect of urea on polymer loading of simul with different monomers
MMA
in
MeOH
(v/v)
10
30
50
70
90
Tr=
%PL
AM
B
10
51
68
102
74
1.51
BMA
U
12
67
82
143
81
1.56
ST
7
34
50
63
96
1.10
11
48
73
92
138
1.36
MMA
5
20
27
35
41
1.07
6
25
35
47
51
1.12
13
30
38
41
44
1.12
20
40
46
48
52
1.27
60C and 50 mm Hg to remove the unreacted (unused) impregnating solution. Polymer loading (PL),
index of composite formation was determined from
the weight increase of the wood sample after the
whole treatment. Tensile strengths (TS) of the treated
and untreated samples were directly measured using
INSTRON (model 1011, UK). The change in tensile
strength due to this treatment was determined by
tensile strength factor Tr following the equation,
Z f = TSwp~/TSwood.
RESULTS AND D I S C U S S I O N
Blank
NVP
%PL
TPGDA
TMPTA
Urea
10
30
50
70
90
13
30
38
41
58
14
40
42
47
58
22
40
50
60
48
45
55
70
65
43
20
40
46
48
52
625
90
60
80
50
70
~tj
10%
+ 30%
50%
70%
x 90%
60
40
50
"+
r~
30
,.~ 40
o
"6
u
./~
/"
20
10
~ 50%
a70%
><90%
20
l0
10
10
80
70
60
~0
o~,,~
50
40
O
30
20
70%
90%
10
10
U r e a c o n c e n t r a t i o n (%)
Fig. 3. Polymer loading against urea concentration with respect to M M A concentration in M e O H in
presence o f T P G D A (1%).
626
M . M . Husain
et al.
100
90
~.
80
70
~.O
60
!~~"
i A.
50
x
40
I
0
Urea
90%
I
10
concentration (%)
Fig. 4. Polymer loading against urea concentration with respect to MMA concentration in MeOH in
presence of TMPTA (1%).
after which PL values remain steady, indicating a
sort of equilibrium conditions reached among urea,
M e O H , M M A at the time of the polymerization
process within the void space of the cellulose and the
cellulose backbone chain.
When N V P is used as a second solute (1%) in
the impregnating solution, the overall PL values are
enhanced at all concentrations of M M A . The highest
PL value ( ~ 8 0 % ) is attained with 90% M M A at
1% urea. The decrease of PL values after attaining
NVP
TPGDA
TMPTA
Urea
(%)
PL
Tr
PL
Tr
PL
Tr
PL
Tr
0
0.05
0.10
0.25
0.50
1.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
10.00
42
44
44
46
48
52
56
52
55
35
1.12
1.18
1.23
1.25
1.28
1.27
1.40
1.29
1.40
1.20
58
59
60
65
74
72
65
65
60
50
1.50
1.55
1.59
1.61
1.68
1.65
1.60
1.63
1.56
1.53
60
51
62
63
67
68
70
65
67
56
1.27
1.29
1.30
1.32
1.38
1.39
1.47
1.42
1.40
1.34
70
70
74
76
83
87
88
90
86
70
1.34
1.35
1.35
1.36
1.37
1.38
1.42
1.47
1.40
1.38
Tf = Tswp~/TSwood
627
REFERENCES