Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
227-236, 1983
0148-9062/8353.00 + 0.00
Copyright ( 1983 Pergamon Press Lid
H. EINSTEIN*
VENEZIANO*
B. B A E C H E R t
J. O'REILLY$
Discontinuity persistence has a major effect on rock mass resistance (strength)
but, as direct mapping of discontinuities internal to a rock mass is not possible,
persistence is a difficult parameter to measure. As a result, the conservative
approach of assuming full persistence is often taken. In this paper a method
is developed for relating rock mass stability and hence persistence to the
geometry and spatial variability of discontinuities. The method is applied to
slope stability calculations in which the probability of failure is related to
discontinuity data, as obtained in joint surveys. The complete method makes
use of dynamic programming and simulation, but a closed form e,vpression
satisfactory for most purposes is also presented.
INTRODUCTION
Discontinuity (hereafter referred to as joint) persistence
is among the parameters most significantly affecting rock
mass strength, and is a problematic one. While relatively
small bridges of intact rock between otherwise continouous joints substantially increase strength, the mapping of each joint is impossible on a practical basis. An
attractive alternative to separately considering specific
joints is offered by statistical techniques for sampling
and describing the geometry of discontinuities.
These techniques are at an early stage of development,
but offer a significant advancement of the state of the art:
they characterize persistence as a random variable and,
in conjunction with a mechanical model of rock failure,
produce the probability distribution of rock mass
strength.
A method is developed here for rock-slope reliability
analysis based on a probabilistic characterization of the
joint system. In doing so, it is found convenient to
modify the traditional definition of rock persistence by
accounting for the uncertain failure path. Preceding
work is briefly described, and is followed by a description of the present method.
defined as the fraction of area that is actually discontinuous. One can therefore express K as the limit
K=
Y~ aoi
i
AD
(2a)
(i)
lim
]~ODI ,~ Jointed Area
AD-~m A D
Total Area
228
/~-'f
rock bridge
(RBR)
N-ECHELON
~:JL+ ZRBR
ZJL
K - ZJL + ERBR"
(2b)
I = lim - V,~
(3)
(4)
(5)
A~
FAILURE
Aj
R = ~ - Rr + ~- Rj
= (tr~ tan q~, + c.)A,
(6)
c a = ( l - K) cr + Kcj,
tan Oa = (1 - K) tan 4). + K tan ~bj.
(7)
];o i
Aj
Aj
EINSTEIN et al.:
229
Or
1"
Fig. 5, Mohr's circle at failure predicted by Jennings' relations at low stress levels.
J/
~~-I~
,,Critical oath
-S/
Fig. 6. Critical paths for different joint configurations.
Fig. 7. Joint configuration and its critical path in a portion of the rock
mass.
230
EINSTEIN et al.:
/Step = a
"
% Tensile
Failure
= "~- I00
RANDOM VARIABLES
Length
Dip
Spacing
//;/
Overlap
(9)
where
R=
Rj =
R~ =
Rr =
resistance
resistance
resistance
resistance
of failure path,
of joint plane if 100Yo persistence,
along joint path, if intact rock only.
along joint path, if intact rock only.
.:,
~,% P'~M,
I /
pf, _ Nr~
Ni,
(10)
R = ~ R~,
231
At relatively low stress levels (tra small), the application of shear stress in the direction of movement leads
to a minimum principal stress (r3 equal to the tensile
strength of intact rock. Hence in this case, failure
occurs by tensile fractures that develop at high angles
to the direction of sliding (Fig. 12a). Simultaneously
with the appearance of these fractures, peak shear
resistance za in the sliding direction is attained. Thereafter, shearing at residual stress values takes place in
the direction of sliding.
At higher normal stress levels, the minimum principal
stress does not exceed the tensile strength and failure
occurs when ra equals the shear resistance defined by
the Coulomb failure criterion. In this case, shear
fractures develop in the sliding direction at the time
when the applied shear stress is maximum (see Fig.
12b).
The two modes can be visualized by use of Mohr's
circle. In a direct sheart test, the center of Mohr's circle
remains at all times at trJ2 as the shear stress varies from
zero to the value at failure. For small (r~ (Fig. 13),
Mohr's circle becomes tangent to the failure envelope at
a = - T s , ~ = 0 and thus failure occurs in tension (Mode
1). For larger O'a, the center of Mohr's circle lies more to
the right and the point of first tangency is located on the
linear portion of the envelope. Thus, as shown in Fig. 14,
this mode of failure (mode 2) corresponds to shear
failure in the traditional formulation as used by Jennings
[5]. Both types of failure can occur, but Mode 2 probably
only in high slopes with weak intact rock. Thus, Mode
2 is neglected in the following discussion.
Failures may be in plane or out of plane (en echelon).
During in-plane failure, tension cracks develop first,
%
TO..._ ~
~- Primory tension
i l l / / ] ~ frocture (high ongle)
p t - - / - ~ - F - i i'--seon~..y ,o...ok.)
[/----,
j ir
shear frocture
o) FAILURE IN TENSION
(l I)
%
~ . ~ L o w
I
J~
b) FAILURE IN SHEAR
232
EINSTEIN et al.:
Pointof
/~
shear fracture
R = r,d,
(12)
cro
(]4)
~,tJ
Pointof
1.--Yl-
o\',,I
Tensile
~---'lf r o e t u r y
~ V ~
' ',,
singrOtofailure
fracture
O"
Fig. 16. Failure of "'low angle" (fl <(0 +~)) transitions through
intact rock.
EINSTEIN et al.:
cture
critical
paths
having
negative
SMs
to
all critical paths, as a function of the depth z (Fig. 18)
at which the paths daylight on the slope face. If a joint
plane daylights in height interval "i" on the slope face
(Fig. 10), the probability that at least one wedge belonging to this interval is unstable is Pf(zi) where ,j is the
vertical distance between the mid-point of the height
interval and the slope crest. At present, the only way to
calculate Pf(z) is through repeated Monte Carlo simulation of the network of joints. However, it is possible
to obtain analytical lower bounds to Pf(z). One such
bound, in many cases close to the exact value, is derived
in Appendix A.
(2) Probability Distribution of Apparent Persistence
Ka. Ka is the average persistence along an existing joint
plane that produces a SM equal to that of the associated
critical path, the plane and its critical path daylighting
at the same point on the slope face (the critical path may
be the particular joint plane or it may have an en echelon
shape involving other joint planes). It follows from the
definition that Ka is not smaller than the actual persistence of the plane, K. The probability distribution of
apparent persistence depends on depth. Of special interest is the variation with depth of the mean value mKd and
the standard deviation rx~, which together with the
critical persistence defined below are used to define a
second moment reliability index.
(3) Critical Persistence K,.. The critical path is unstable and failure occurs if/Ca exceeds the critical value of
persistence Kc which, in using the parameters in Table 1,
is given by
cj
~bj
7r
Unit weight
~b,
Value or
range
Definition
Resistance parameters
Intact-rock cohesion
(assumed to be twice the rock
tensile strength)
Intact-rock friction angle (not
important at low stress levels)
Joint cohesion
Joint friction angle
CF
233
0.30-24.0 MPa
(8-500 ksf)
Fixed 30~
Fixed 0
0-40
Other parameter
Fixed 2.2 g/cm 3
( 150 Ib/ft 3)
234
3z
Kc=100
(16)
where
W cos a
C--
--
JLcr
(4) Second-Movement Reliability Index [3 is the number of standard deviations separating the mean K. from
the critical value Kc,
/3 - K~
mx__-____.___~"
(17)
For Fh.(K) the cumulative distribution function of apparent persistence at a given depth, the probability of
failure at that depth becomes
Pf = 1 - F~q (K~)
= 1 - Fx,(mK+/3ax,)
(18)
50
Cr = 1,2- 24 MPo
~i =0"
8 = 60*
(Z=40*
Xr = Z,2 g/cm 3
40
d[=40
S'-P= I.Sm
K:50 %
1.2 MPa
3O
Pf (%)
2.4 M Pa
20
N
4.8 MPa
IO
Pc
0/
0
(o
I
7.5
I
15
I
27
30 m
25
50
75
ioo ft',
Z ~
F i g . 19. E f f e c t o f i n t a c t - r o c k
c o h e s i o n (cJ o n Pr(:)-
E I N S T E I N et al.: D I S C O N T I N U I T Y P E R S I S T E N C E A N D SLOPE S T A B I L I T Y
zc
Z -..--o-
235
DEC.
Z -~-'~,-
z .------~
Z -------~
t
\
I)
hc
Z -~4P-
Z ---4~
Z.~-
Z .-~-
Fig. 20. Probability of failure Pr as a function of slope depth z and of the other slope parameters.
s. 20/5--c
CONCLUSIONS
Joint persistence has a major effect on rock-mass
resistance, and yet, it is difficult to define a persistence
parameter simply and directly related to resistance.
First, joint geometry internal to a rock mass is not
known with certainty, and second, failure involves a
combination of mechanisms, including shearing along
joints and failure through intact rock, either in plane or
en-echelon.
The proposed approach expressed probability of rockslope failure as a function of joint geometry and intact
rock and joint resistance. Spatial variability of joint
geometry is taken into account by making use of statistical information obtained from standard joint surveys.
Probability of failure as derived with the SLOPESIM
approach or the related expression of apparent persistence thus makes it possible to represent the effect of
joint persistence directly.
Parametric studies show the relations between rockslope reliability (l-Pf) and various mechanical and geometric parameters; graphs of probability of failure vs
slope height are particularly illustrative. An important
result is the indication of when strength parameters are
more important than geometry, and vice versa.
Although an initial step, the proposed approach
promises insights into a major problem in rock mechanics.
236
EINSTEIN et al.:
REFERENCES
1. Call R. D. and Nicholas D. E. Prediction of step path failure
geometry for slope stability analysis. Proc. 19th U.S. Syrup. on Rock
Mechanics (1978).
2. Einstein H. H. et al. Risk analysis for rock slopes in open pit
mines, Parts I-V, USBM Technical Rept J0275015 (1980).
3. Glynn E. F. A probabilistic approach to the stability of rock
slopes, Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T. (February, 1979).
4. Hasofer A. M. and Lind N. C. Exact and invariant second moment
code format. A S C E J. Engng Mech. Die. 100, 111-121, No. EMI,
Proc. Paper 10376 (February, 1974).
5. Jennings J. E. A mathematical theory for the calculation of the
stability of open cast mines. Proc. Symp. on the Theoretical Background to the Planning o f Open Pit Mines, pp. 87-102, Johannesburg
(1970).
6. Lajtai E. Z. Strength of discontinuous rocks in shear. Geotechnique
19(2), 218-233 (1969).
7. O'Reilly K. J. The effect of joint phase persistence on slope
reliability, M.Sc. thesis, M.I.T., 553 pp (1980).
8. Shair A. K. The effect of two sets of joints on rock slope reliability,
M.Sc. thesis, M.I.T.. 307pp (1981).
9. Stimpson D. Failure of slopes containing discontinuous planar
joints. Proc. 19th U.S. Syrup. on Rock Mechanics, pp. 246-300
(1978).
APPENDIX
(AI)