Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Facts:
In 1934, Silvestre Querubin, a Filipino, married petitioner
Margaret Querubin, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. 'They had a
daughter, Querubina. In 1949, the Superior Court of Los Angeles
granted the divorce on the ground of Margarets infidelity and awarded
"joint custody" of the child.
On March that year, custody was granted to Silvestre under an
interlocutory decree (although the child was still kept in the neutral
home) because at the time of the trial, Margaret was living with
another man. Upon Margaret's petition, the interlocutory decree was
modified. Since she had then married the man she was living with and
had a stable home, the Court granted custody to Margaret with
reasonable limitations on the part of the father.
Silvestre, together with Querubina, left San Francisco on
November of the same year, went to the Philippines and stayed in
Cagayan, Ilocos Sur, with the intent of protecting the child from the
effects of her mother's scandalous conduct.
Ruling:
The decree is by no means final. It is subject to change with the
circumstances. Because the decree is interlocutory, it cannot be implemented in the Philippines. Where the judgment is merely interlocutory,
the determination of the question by the Court that rendered it did not
settle and adjudge finally the rights of the parties.
In the case at bar, the circumstances have changed. Querubina
is not in Los Angeles, she is in Cagayan, Ilocos Sur, under her father's
care. It is a long way from one place to the other. Neither can Margaret
prove that she can pay the cost of passage for the minor. She is not a
packet of cigarettes one can send by mail. Neither can she answer for
Querubina's support, care and education. In comparison, the father has
shown both interest in the child and capacity to provide for the needs
of the child.
Under the Divorce Act No. 2710, the guilty spouse is not entitled
to custody of the minor children. Under the current legislation, morality
and public order it is stated that the child must be outside the care of a
mother who has violated the oath of fidelity to her husband. We
believe that this Court should not enforce the decree of a foreign court
that violates our laws and sound principles of morality that form our
social structure on family relationships.