Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Thermochimica Acta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tca
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 October 2011
Received in revised form 1 February 2012
Accepted 3 February 2012
Available online 22 February 2012
Keywords:
Shape memory
Gibbs free energy
Elastic strain energy
Vickers hardness
a b s t r a c t
The effects of thermal aging at a constant temperature above Af (austenite phase nish temperature) on
the martensitic transformation of the CuAlNi shape memory alloy were investigated. The evolution of
the transformation temperatures was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). It was found
that the thermal aging at a constant temperature above Af has a complex effect on the transformation
parameters of the CuAlNi shape memory alloy. The Ms , Mf , As , and Af transformation temperatures were
shifted by the thermal annealing. The thermodynamic parameters such as Gibbs free energy and the
elastic strain energy of the alloy experienced a decreasing tendency with increasing the aging time. The
structural properties of aged alloy samples were studied by X-ray diffraction measurements at room
temperature. It was found that the phase transformation parameters of the alloy are controlled by the
crystallite size effect.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Cu-based shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been paid more
attention in past few years owing to their low price, easy fabrication
and excellent conductivity of heat and electricity. Shape memory
alloys exhibit the remarkable thermomechanical properties like
pseudoelasticity (PE), shape memory effect (SME) and two-way
shape memory effect (TWSME). These last two are probably the best
known and they make very suitable this class of the materials for
innovative applications in various elds [13]. These remarkable
properties are controlled by a reversible structural transformation,
martensitic transformation, between the highly symmetric parent
phase (P) and the less ordered martensite (M) solid phases.
The shape memory effect is basically linked to a martensitic
transformation occurring in steels and several non-ferrous alloys.
By analogy with the martensitic transition of steels, the low temperature and high temperature phases of non-ferrous alloys are
called martensite (M) and austenite (A), respectively [1,4].
Several copper-based alloys have exhibited the shape-memory
effect and the understanding their characteristic thermal behaviors
and microstructure evolutions has brought a signicant impact on
their applications [5]. However, the shape memory effect (SME) of
the alloys is susceptible to aging whether in austenite phase (parent phase) or in martensite phase, which affects the applicability
of the alloys. There have been a lot of reports on the aging in parent
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: nbalo@rat.edu.tr (S.N. Balo).
0040-6031/$ see front matter 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.02.007
2. Experimental
A ternary Cu-rich CuAlNi SMA with a nominal composition of
Cu13.5 wt.%Al4 wt.%Ni was supplied by Tremetaux, Centr de
Recherce (France). The samples cut from the alloy were annealed
in the phase eld for 20 min at 1203 K for betatization and rapidly
quenched in iced brine to obtained 1 martensite. The CuAlNi samples were aged for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 h above 50 K of the austenite
phase nish temperature (398 K). Aged alloy samples with various
periods were directly quenched in iced brine. The transformation
characteristics of un-aged sample and aged samples were examined by a Perkin-Elmer Sapphire model thermal analyzer at heating
and cooling rates of 10 K/min in the 303373 K range.
Fig. 1. DSC curve of CuAlNi specimen annealed at 1203 K for betatization and rapidly quenched and un-aged.
alloy. The range of the phase change temperature varies with aging
and tends to decrease with increasing aging time. The hysteresis
width (Af Ms ) is varied by the thermal aging and generally tends
to increase with aging time. The obtained results suggest that the
transformation range of both (Ms Mf ) and (Af As ) is decreased by
the long-term thermal aging, since the thermal range of aged samples is narrower than that of un-aged sample, as seen in Table 1.
The Ms temperature is changed up to 7 K. Mf , As and Af temperatures also are shifted by the different amounts. This implies that
the hysteresis is changed, because the change in the transformation
temperatures Ms , Mf , As and Af is not the same for all the samples.
Also, it is well known that the difference in Ms Mf or Af As is related
to the stored elastic energy. Therefore, it seems worthwhile to analyze the thermal aging effects from a thermodynamical point of
view, which should be included into the discussion of the aging
effect above the austenite phase nish temperature on the CuAlNi
SMA.
The equilibrium temperature T0 between the martensitic and
the austenite phases is the temperature at which the Gibbs free
energies of the two phases are equal. Thus, the Gibss free energy
dependence of T0 temperature is expressed by the following relation,
GMA (T0 ) = GA (T0 ) GM (T0 ) = (H A T0 S A ) (H M T0 S M )
= H MA (T0 S MA )
(1)
The GM A Gibss free energy values for the various aging times
were calculated and are shown in Fig. 3. It is found that Gibbs free
energy is decreased by about 6% after 7 h thermal aging.
Fig. 3. Changes of GAM and Ge compared with the value of not aged sample.
Table 1
The transformation temperature parameters of the alloy at various aging times.
Aging time (h)
Ms (K)
Mf (K)
Ms Mf (K)
As (K)
Af (K)
Af As (K)
Af Ms (K)
T0 (K)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
350.9
350.7
353.4
348.3
350.2
345.3
344.1
343.9
331.7
327.8
336.1
329.5
335.2
332.6
332.1
329.3
292.2
295.9
290.3
291.8
288.0
285.7
285.0
287.6
341.3
344.4
347.0
340.9
347.1
343.8
343.4
340.6
358.5
361.1
363.5
354.2
359.5
355.5
354.5
352.6
290.2
289.7
289.5
286.3
285.4
284.7
284.1
285.0
280.6
283.4
283.1
278.9
282.3
283.2
283.4
281.7
354.7
355.9
358.4
351.2
354.8
350.4
349.3
348.2
Table 2
Aging effects on the thermodynamic parameters and Vickers Hardness of the alloy.
Aging time (h)
T0 (K)
HM A (kJ/kg)
SM A (J/kg K)
GA M (J)
Ge (J)
Average values of
Vickers hardness
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
354.7
355.9
358.4
351.2
354.8
350.4
349.3
348.2
9.15
7.22
8.32
8.69
9.06
8.84
8.41
8.88
25.79
20.28
23.21
24.74
25.53
25.22
24.07
25.50
0.095
0.095
0.106
0.070
0.115
0.123
0.124
0.101
7.347
5.424
6.192
7.118
7.212
6.905
6.805
6.791
725
736
837
801
595
518
597
701
1
(MS + Af )
2
(2)
H MA
S MA
(3)
The hysteresis in the transformation is characterized by the driving force for the nucleation of martensite GAM (Ms ) as [1113]
(5)
where S MA entropy change and T0 is the equilibrium temperature between the martensitic and austenitic phases. As seen
in Table 2 and Fig. 4, the thermodynamic equilibrium temperature, T0 of the martensitic and the austenitic phases is increased
for 1 h and 2 h aging and then, is decreased with 4 h and up
aging times. The latent heat H MA of phase transformation and
S MA entropy values vary around 8.57 103 0.617 J/kg and
24.29 103 1.83 J/kg K respectively, as shown in Table 2. The elastic strain energy values Ge , for the samples were calculated and are
shown in Fig. 3. The elastic strain energy shows a minimum point
Fig. 4. Effect of various aging times on the equilibrium temperature of the alloy.
Fig. 5. X-ray piece diffractograms of CuAlNi shape memory alloy; (a) heat treated
and (b) aging at 2 h, (c) aging at 3 h (d) aging at 4 h, (e) aging at 7 h at 398 K after the
heat treatment.
Table 3
Lattice Parameters according to aging time of the alloy.
Aging time (h)
a ()
b ()
c ()
a/b
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4.2001
4.4433
4.1964
4.4498
4.1958
4.4958
4.4814
4.1804
5.1592
5.3826
5.1580
5.4069
5.1456
5.3153
5.3760
5.1604
38.6607
38.6207
38.8988
38.4020
38.5043
38.8157
38.4944
38.3599
84.19
85.41
84.07
84.82
84.42
85.32
92.92
86.48
0.8141
0.8255
0.8136
0.8230
0.8154
0.8458
0.8336
0.8101
h2
sin2
k2
1
+ 2
b2
c
l2
sin2
2hl cos
ac sin2
(6)
a/b ratios and lattice parameters of 18R martensite phase were calculated from the X-ray diffractograms
with aging duration are given
in Table 3. This ratio is less than 3/2 in the ordered case due to
atomic sizes of the constituent atoms for 18R martensite [15,16]. It
is evaluated that the X-ray results conrm a monoclinic 18R basis.
The changes in peak characteristics of the XRD patterns with aging
duration were investigated. Although all the XRD patterns exhibit
the similar characteristics, it was observed that the peak locations
of some diffraction planes were changed. Structure ordering is one
of the important factors for formation of martensitic [16,17]. It is
evaluated that the martensitic phase in Cu-based -phase alloys
is based on one of the (1 1 0) planes of austenite phase called
basal plane for martensite. A (1 1 0) plane in the -phase of DO3
(or L21 ) type ordered structure is rectangular, as in original case,
and it transforms to a hexagon with hexagonal distortion during
the martensitic transformation [18]. 18R is a metastable structure while the equilibrium structure of Cu13.5 wt.%Al4 wt.%Ni
shape memory alloy is formed from , and 2 phases. After 7 h
aging at 398 K, it is expectable that some atomic migration would
occur which would enable the precipitation of any of the above
equilibrium phases. This diffusion controlled phenomena would
alter the chemical composition of austenite, since we deal with
austenite aging, and this could explain the change in the critical
transformation temperatures. But if, it is evaluated that the entire
structure comprises only metastable 18R martensite, even after the
quenching of a 7 h-aged sample, this means there is no retained
austenite because it totally transformed into 18R martensite and
no marked uctuations of chemical concentration were observed
after quenching.
The crystallite size for the alloy was determined by the following
relation [19,20]
D=
0.9
b cos
(7)