Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Q1 3
4
5
Centre for Ionics University Malaya, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 24 June 2011
Received in revised form 14 November 2011
Accepted 23 November 2011
Available online xxxx
A series of biodegradable polymer electrolytes were fabricated by utilizing corn starch (CS), lithium bis(triuoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LITFSI) and deep eutectic solvent (DES) (synthesized from the mixture of choline chloride and urea with 1:2 ratio) by solution casting technique. The incorporation of DES in plasticizing
the CS:LiTFSI matrix was valued primarily due to its capability in increasing the amorphous elastomeric phase
that is crucial in enhancing the ionic transport mechanism. The conductivitytemperature plot reveals the
nature of the cation transport which commensurates with Arrhenius rule. The highest conducting sample
was identied for the composition CS:LiTFSI:DES (14 wt.%:6 wt.%:80 wt.%) exhibiting the ionic conductivity
value of 4.56 10 3 S cm 1 at 50 C with activation energy of 8.22 kJ mol 1. The relaxation frequency of
sample DES-80 is log m = 6.03 Hz, being the lowest relaxation time as revealed by the dielectric loss tangent
plot. The decreasing trends in the melting temperature of polymer electrolytes with increase in DES content
correlate to the occurrence of complexation that induces structural disorderliness. The heat-resistivity of
polymer electrolyte diminishes with the addition of DES and enhancement in the thermal stability was observed at the minimum DES content as revealed in TGA analysis.
2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords:
Deep eutectic solvent
Ionic conductivity
Melting temperature
Thermal decomposition
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
R
O
38
37
1. Introduction
40
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
N
C
O
43
44
41
42
39
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
36
35
Please cite this article as: S. Ramesh, et al., J. Mol. Liq. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2011.11.010
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
131
132
133
138
139
102
2. Experimental
146
103
2.1. Materials
104
107
152
108
153
109
154
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
t1:1
t1:2
t1:3
t1:4
t1:5
t1:6
t1:7
t1:8
R
O
110
111
105
106
98
99
96
97
94
95
92
93
91
89
90
87
88
2.3. Instrumentation
100
101
o expEa =KT
4:1
85
86
Table 1
Composition ratio of CS:LiTFSI:DES system with the ionic conductivity, relaxation frequency and activation energy (Ea) exhibited by polymer electrolytes with different
DES content.
Sample Polymer
electrolyte (CS:
LiTFSI:DES) (wt.%)
Ionic
conductivity at
50 C,
(S cm 1)
Relaxation
frequency, log
[m (Hz)]
Activation
energy, Ea
(kJ mol 1)
DES-0
DES-20
DES-40
DES-60
DES-80
2.26 10 5
4.98 10 5
7.56 10 5
9.09 10 4
4.56 10 3
4.70
5.10
6.00
6.03
13.16
12.55
8.25
8.22
70:
56:
49:
28:
14:
30:0
24:20
21:40
12:60
6:80
Fig. 1. Arrhenius plots of log conductivity against reciprocal temperature for sample
DES-20 (), DES-40 (), DES-60 () and DES-80 (x).
Please cite this article as: S. Ramesh, et al., J. Mol. Liq. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2011.11.010
134
135
136
137
140
141
142
143
144
145
147
148
149
150
151
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
182
183
184
185
186
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
R
O
223
224
225
250
201
202
199
200
197
198
195
196
193
194
191
192
N
C
O
189
190
187
188
Fig. 3. Variation of tan with frequency for sample DES-80 at room temperature.
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
Knowledge on the inuence of both LiTFSI and DES content on the 251
CS matrix thermal properties was evaluated by the overlay thermo- 252
gravimetric curves of pure CS, DES-0, DES-20 and DES-80 as 253
Table 2
t2:1
The melting temperature, maximum decomposition temperature and total weight loss
of pure CS, DES-0, DES-20 and DES-80.
t2:2
Sample
Temperature, T (C)
Total
t2:3
weight
Melting, Tm
t2:4
Maximum decomposition, Td
loss,
wt (%)
Fig. 2. Variation of tan with frequency for samples DES-20 (), DES-40 () and DES60 () at room temperature.
Pure CS
DES-0
DES-20
DES-80
313.36
291.12
257.57
236.69
Please cite this article as: S. Ramesh, et al., J. Mol. Liq. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2011.11.010
317.56
406.67
382.50
261.45
86
82
80
88
t2:5
t2:6
t2:7
t2:8
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
354
304
305
306
R
O
4. Conclusion
References
270
271
268
Q2 269
266
267
264
265
262
263
260
261
258
259
256
257
254
255
294
295
Fig. 4. Thermogravimetric curves for pure CS (), DES-0 (), DES-20 () and DES-80 (x).
which easily decomposes at lower temperature. Nevertheless this effort improves the thermal stability of the polymer electrolytes evident by the lesser total weight loss.
Further increase in DES content leads to the decline in both the
heat-resistivity and thermal stability. This was associated to the presence of greater amorphous phase in the polymer electrolytes making
it more heat sensitive. Thus, reduction in heat-resistivity will be observed companied by the increment in total weight loss as more
DES particles being eliminated out from the polymer electrolytes matrix upon the heating process [20].
[1] D.F. Vieira, C.O. Avellaneda, A. Pawlicka, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2007) 14041408.
[2] R.L. Wu, X.L. Wang, F. Li, H.Z. Li, Y.Z. Wang, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009)
25692574.
[3] Y.X. Xu, V. Miladinov, M.A. Hanna, Cereal Chem. 81 (2004) 735740.
[4] C. Beninca, I.M. Demiate, L.G. Lacerda, M.A.S. Carvalho Filho, M. Ionashiro, E.
Schnitzler, Ecletica Quim. 33 (2008) 1318.
[5] Y. Takeda, S. Tomooka, S. Hizukuri, Carbohydr. Res. 246 (1993) 267272.
[6] W. Ning, Z. Xingxiang, L. Haihui, H. Benqiao, Carbohydr. Polym. 76 (2009)
482484.
[7] W.A. Atwell, L.F. Hood, D.R. Lineback, E. Varriano-Marston, H.F. Zobel, Cereal Food
Worlds 33 (1988) 306311.
[8] A.P. Abbott, G. Capper, D.L. Davies, R.K. Rasheed, V. Tambyrajah, Chem. Commun.
39 (2003) 7071.
[9] Y. Hou, Y. Gu, S. Zhang, F. Yang, H. Ding, Y. Shan, J. Mol. Liq. 143 (2008) 154159.
[10] H.R. Jhong, D.S.H. Wong, C.C. Wan, Y.Y. Wang, T.C. Wei, Electrochem. Commun. 11
(2009) 209211.
[11] J. Zhang, T. Wu, S. Chen, P. Feng, X. Bu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48 (2009)
34863490.
[12] S. Rajendran, M. Sivakumar, R. Subadevi, Mater. Lett. 58 (2004) 641649.
[13] J. Siva Kumar, A.R. Subrahmanyam, M. Jaipal Reddy, U.V. Subba Rao, Mater. Lett.
60 (2006) 33463349.
[14] D.F. Shriver, B.L. Papke, M.A. Ratner, R. Dupon, T. Wong, M. Brodwin, Solid State
Ionics 5 (1981) 8388.
[15] M.B. Armand, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 16 (1986) 245261.
[16] M.A. Ratner, D.F. Shriver, Chem. Rev. 88 (1988) 109124.
[17] D.K. Paradhan, R.N.P. Choundhary, B.K. Samantaray, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 3
(2008) 597608.
[18] M.A.S. Azizi Samir, F. Alloin, W. Gorecki, J.Y. Sanchez, A. Dufresne, J. Phys. Chem. B
108 (2004) 1084510852.
[19] M.Z. Norashikin, M.Z. Ibrahim, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 58 (2009) 176180.
[20] A.A. Mohamad, A.K. Arof, Mater. Lett. 61 (2007) 30963099.
Please cite this article as: S. Ramesh, et al., J. Mol. Liq. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2011.11.010
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353