126 visualizações

Enviado por foolai

CMU Stats HW#4

- digital unit plan template
- 11 MM Ch08
- 2016 ict assignments 23a3b - draft project planning
- Lecture Notes for Introductory Probability
- Probability Exercise
- Maths-II-02 Model papers of Kerala Board of Higher Secondary Education, XIIth Class
- Probability L2 PT
- probability
- Bayes
- Week2
- Math Reviewer
- edma
- lPs.doc
- pdf sequential ipg template v1
- Worksheet%2b4%2bwith%2banswers
- Solution
- Seeing Theory
- A2qwr24
- Conditional
- Chapter 08 Stat

Você está na página 1de 3

Homework 3

Due February 12

1. You choose n random points in succession on the unit circle. (That is, on the perimeter not in the

disk.) The position of each point is chosen uniformly over the circle, and the positions of all points are

independent. Let A be the event that all the points are contained in some semicircle. Let Ai denote

the event that all the points lie in the semicircle beginning at the i-th point and going clockwise for

180deg, i = 1 . . . , n.

(a) Express A in terms of the Ai s.

(b) Are the Ai s disjoint?

(c) Show that

n1

1

P (A) = n

.

2

See the Figure below for examples.

You can assume that the probability that, for any two points, the line connecting them

goes through the center of the circle is 0.

2. A hunter has two hunting dogs. One day, on the trail of some animal, the hunter comes to a place

where the road diverges into two paths. He knows that each dog will choose will choose the correct

path with probability p, independently of the other. The hunter decides to let each dog choose a

path and, if they agree, take that one, and if they disagree, to randomly pick a path. Is this strategy

better than just letting one of the two dogs decide on a path?

3. Suppose we want to generate the outcome of a flip of a fair coin but that all we have at our disposal

is a biased coin which lands on heads with some unknown probability 0 < p < 1, which needs not be

equal to 1/2. Consider the following procedure for accomplishing our task:

(a) Flip the coin.

(b) Flip the coin again.

(c) If both flips land heads or both land tails returns to step (a)

(d) Let the result of the last flip be the result of the experiment.

Show that the result is equally likely to be either heads or tails. (Hint: you may want to use the

following result, proved in class: suppose A and B are disjoint events of positive probability such that

P (A) + P (B) < 1 and that independent trials of the experiments are performed. Then, the probability

that A is observed before B is

P (A)

.

P (A) + P (B)

A simpler procedure would be to continue to flip until the last two flips are different and then let

the result be the outcome of the last flip. Show this procedure, however, will not result in equally

likely outcomes if p 6= 1/2.

4. A simplified model for the movement of the price of a stock supposes that on each day the stocks

price either moves up one unit with probability p or it moves down one unit with probability 1 p.

The changes on different days are assumed to be independent.

1

(a) What is the probability that after two days the stock will be at its original price?

(b) What is the probability that after three days the stocks price will have increased by one unit?

(c) Given that after three days the stock price has increased by one unit, what is the probability

that it went up on the first day?

5. Sarah and Dick go target shooting. Suppose that each of Sarahs shots hits the target with probability

0 < p1 < 1, while each shot of Dicks hits the target with probability 0 < p2 < 1. Suppose they shoot

simultaneously at the same target and that the events that they each hits the target are independent.

If the wooden target is knocked over (indicating that it was hit), what is the probability that

(a) Both shots hit the target?

(b) Dicks shot hit the target?

6. Consider a sequence of mutually independent trials, where each trial is equally likely to result in

any of the outcomes 1, 2 or 3. The sequence ends as soon as the three outcomes have appeared at

least once. Given that the outcome 3 is the last of the three outcomes to occur, find the conditional

probability that

(a) the first trial results in outcome 1;

(b) the first two trials both result in outcome 1.

Hint: use the events F1 , S1 and L3 ,the events that the first trial results in outcome 1, that the second

trial results in outcome 1 and that the last trial results in outcome 3, respectively.

7. More on Bayes theorem: prior, posterior and probability updating. Let A1 , A2 , . . . , An be

a partition of the sample space and B and C be two events of positive probabilities and such that

P (B C) > 0.

(a) The event A and B are said to be conditionally independent given C if

P (A B|C) = P (A|C)P (B|C).

Read about conditional independence in section 1.5 of the textbook. Show that if A and B are

conditionally independent given C then

P (A|B C) = P (A|C).

(b) Show the following conditional version of Bayes teorem:

P (Ai |C)P (B|Ai C)

P (Ai |B C) = Pn

.

j=1 P (Aj |C)P (B|Aj C)

(c) (Prior and posterior probabilities.) Suppose that a box contains one fair coin and a coin with a

head on each side. Suppose also that one coin is selected at random and than, when it is tossed,

a head is obtained. Let B1 the event that the selected coin is fair, B2 the event that the coin

has two heads and H1 the event that a head is obtained when the selected coin is tossed. Use

Bayes theorem to compute

P (B1 |H1 ).

Compare P (B1 ), the prior probability that the selected coin is fair with P (B1 |H1 ), the posterior probability that the selected coin is fair (the posterior probability takes into account the

additional information that the outcome of the coin toss was observed to be heads).

2

(d) (Posterior probability updating.) Now suppose that the same coin is tossed a second time and

that another head is obtained. Let H2 be the event that a head is obtained when the selected

coin is tossed for the second time. Assume that H1 and H2 are conditionally independent given

B1 and B2 (this means that the outcomes of two tosses of the same coin are independent). We

are now interested in P (B1 |H1 H2 ), the conditional probability that the selected coin is the fair

coin given that both the first and the second toss resulted in heads. There are two equivalent

ways of calculating P (B1 |H1 H2 ), described below (notice that in both cases you will need to

use the fact that H1 and H2 are conditionally independent given both B1 and B2 ).

i. Compute P (B1 |H1 H2 ) using directly the definition of Bayes theorem given in class.

ii. Compute P (B1 |H1 H2 ) in two steps: first compute P (B1 |H1 ), the posterior probability

of B1 given H1 . This conditional probability now serves as a new prior probability for the

next stage of the experiment, in which the same coin is tossed a second time. In order to

compute the new posterior probability you have to use the conditional version of Bayes

theorem from part (b).

Compare P (B1 |H1 H2 ) with both P (B1 |H1 ) and P (B1 ). Explain.

- digital unit plan templateEnviado porapi-267623848
- 11 MM Ch08Enviado porlakvinu
- 2016 ict assignments 23a3b - draft project planningEnviado porapi-311997397
- Lecture Notes for Introductory ProbabilityEnviado porمهند عدنان الجعفري
- Probability ExerciseEnviado porSAi Krishna
- Maths-II-02 Model papers of Kerala Board of Higher Secondary Education, XIIth ClassEnviado porAkshay Pandey
- Probability L2 PTEnviado porpreticool_2003
- probabilityEnviado porsonalivizard
- BayesEnviado porravitomar7
- Week2Enviado porterrygoh6972
- Math ReviewerEnviado porReje Velasco
- edmaEnviado porapi-285542548
- lPs.docEnviado porLoz Yee
- pdf sequential ipg template v1Enviado porapi-291130191
- Worksheet%2b4%2bwith%2banswersEnviado porJohn Michael Ortigas
- SolutionEnviado porDeepesh Bharani
- Seeing TheoryEnviado porJohn Avgerinos
- A2qwr24Enviado porAdam
- ConditionalEnviado porRehab Shehata
- Chapter 08 StatEnviado porHaya Y. Al-Kuwari
- %28ASCE%290733-9364%281989%29115%3A3%28339%29Enviado poraneethavils
- Principleof inclusion and exclusion of probability.pdfEnviado porIgnasi Sanchez
- 943757Enviado porJose Andres Guadarrama Ramirez
- ‘Science’ in the Risk Politics of Bt BrinjalEnviado porasir39
- Department of Education.docxEnviado porBecky May Sajo
- Feller, WilliamEnviado porcreesha
- Risk Management Why and HowEnviado porWenwen Li
- Section 2.7Enviado porthermopolis3012
- Chapter 2 BFC34303 (Lyy).PptEnviado porMohamad Ariff
- b Has ChangedEnviado porKeke Kokelenberg

- 36-217_S15_HW02Enviado porfoolai
- Schedule for mechatronics projectEnviado porfoolai
- 2014_TeamD_DesignProposalEnviado porfoolai
- QuartusII Tutorial(1) 2Enviado porfoolai
- Neil Gaiman - Why Our Future Depends on Libraries, Reading and DaydreamingEnviado porfoolai
- EOS Spring FlyerEnviado porfoolai
- 36-217_S15_HW01Enviado porfoolai
- 15319_SyllabusEnviado porfoolai
- Lecture 8 - Frequency ResponseEnviado porfoolai
- Case WritingEnviado porfoolai
- 1314 Academic CalendarEnviado porfoolai
- 1314 Academic CalendarEnviado porfoolai
- 70311_2013_syllabusEnviado porfoolai
- Opportunities at the Cusps - Interview With FireEye CEO Ashar AzizEnviado porfoolai
- 05-machine-basics.pdfEnviado porrasromeo
- 04 FloatEnviado porfoolai

- NASA: 145563main DPD-1281Enviado porNASAdocuments
- education syllabusEnviado porTeguh Kiyatno
- Chapter 10 Project Management (PERT - CPM)003Enviado porVickie Goh
- Analysis of DTRA Nano Silver StudyEnviado porJoshua Sanchez
- Risk and VolitilityEnviado porapi-3814468
- final annotated bibliographyEnviado porapi-355584062
- 388220824 Gbs Guide Aan Mem PDFEnviado porWahyu Budianto
- table 7 5 learner dimensionEnviado porapi-352159632
- bs_s2.pptEnviado porSimantoPreeom
- IECA_CollegeTop12List.Enviado porKimonas Sas
- Melda Yildiz - Global Kitchen ProjectEnviado porClassroom 2.0 Book
- objective of research in physical propertiesEnviado porNickCanabe
- BesharovEnviado porCaleb Bernacchio
- fair review of litreatre.docxEnviado porAjith Aji
- Hispanic Marketing 101 Volume 8 # 10Enviado porAbraham Larrondo
- Authors CharterEnviado porsachin_kushare
- im i lesson plan template with technologyEnviado porapi-273369356
- A Critical Review of Linguistic Features in ComputerEnviado porRenugah Ramanathan
- althea goddess headdress - manuscript poster-final draftEnviado porapi-240203048
- Ford KA Case.pdfEnviado porAbhishek Chandna
- An iterative Method for the displacement analysis of spatial mechanismsEnviado porAdDy Asunción
- SDTMIG v3.1.2 Draft for Public Comment.pdfEnviado porVishnu Reddy
- Physical Attractiveness: Stereotypes and influence on friendship partner choiceEnviado porClaudia Hrabac
- A Comparative Analysis of Strategies for Design Promotion in Different National Contexts - Ago2010 - FINALEnviado porOleg Solomon
- Land Development Process and Property DevelopmentEnviado porTerry Wong
- The Verity of Facts Depicted in BraveheartEnviado poroldenglishblog
- 3 Evaluations of Lateral Earth Pressure in Soil BentoniteEnviado porGarryAnggadita
- As a 2 Physics Practical HandbookEnviado pormk45a
- out (1).docEnviado porFriska Rahmadia
- (Translation Theories Explored) Christiane Nord-Translating as a Purposeful Activity_ Functionalist Approaches Explained-Routledge (1997)Enviado porTaher