Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
FOR
IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO RECEIVE THIS NEWSLETTER, PLEASE CONTACT phil4juvenilejudge@att.net, AND
YOU WILL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION LIST.
THE ISSUE
Continues:
WEEK TWO
Last week, discussion centered on the main issue in the Juvenile Judge’s race in a
general way. This week, a deeper explanation is offered.
The most recent Juvenile Judge, Ms. Meldrum, proudly spun her time on the bench
in one way as being allied with school officials to decrease truancy. But, was that proper?
Is a juvenile judge supposed to take an affirmative step to enforce truancy laws? Is
a juvenile judge supposed to offer assistance to school officials to get school attendance
up? Is a juvenile judge supposed to become involved with school officials concerning a
matter that will come before that juvenile judge? The answer to these questions is NO.
The school officials are responsible to taking school attendance. If a student is
absent, they are charged with finding out why. If they cannot get a satisfactory explanation
for a student’s absence(s), then one option is to refer the matter to juvenile court. When the
matter gets to juvenile court, the juvenile judge is required to be a disinterested, unbiased,
and impartial trier of the case, not an advocate who promised school officials to enforce
truancy laws. Would you want your juvenile student to appear before a juvenile judge who
has already expressed a bias toward enforcing truancy laws and who has publicly
announced an alliance with school officials, or would you want a disinterested, unbiased,
and impartial trier to hear the matter?
All the candidates for juvenile judge except Phil have fallen for this trap. All the
other candidates want to win public approval by promises to do things such as advocating
the enforcement of truancy laws. But, not Phil. Phil promises to be a disinterested,
unbiased, and impartial trier of cases.