Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1. Introduction
The Department of Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) is under the supervision of
Centre Government and headed by Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India.
Recently, Government of India taking so many initiatives for the development of
2102
Harinder Singh
Nuclear Power Plants and Nuclear Fuel Stations in India. A Nuclear Power Plant is a
Thermal Power Station, in which the heat source is a nuclear reactor as in all
conventional thermal power stations. A nuclear reactor is a device to initiate and
control a sustained nuclear chain reaction. The heat is used to generate steam which
drives a steam turbine connected to a generator, which produces electricity. Nuclear
reactors are used at nuclear power plants for electricity generation. The Heat from
nuclear fission (when heavier nuclear splits into smaller nuclear) is passed to a
working fluid (water or gas), which runs through turbines. The Nuclear Energy is the
use of exothermic nuclear process to generate useful heat and electricity. The term
exothermic reaction includes both nuclear fission and nuclear delay and decay of
Radioactive Materials. Due to easy availability of Thorium and Uranium, these are the
main sources for nuclear fuel cycle, which is to be used in both Nuclear Research
Reactors and Nuclear Power Plants in India. The Nuclear Energy is the fourth-largest
source of electricity in India and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited
(NPCIL) regulates and manages the Nuclear Power Plants in India.
2103
2104
Harinder Singh
with nuclear energy sector, nuclear waste material, nuclear transportation and nuclear
waste management and environment protection in India, such as: The Atomic Energy
Act, 1948,The Nuclear Waste and Policy Act,1987, Radiation Protection
(Amendment) Rules, 2007, The Civil Nuclear Liability for Damage Act, 2010, The
Civil Nuclear Liability for Damage Rules, 2011.
3.1 Relevant Cases
In the case of Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee V. Atomic Energy
Commission449F.2D 1109 (1971) on July 1971a three judge panel of US Court
decided that Baltimore Gas & Electrics application under consideration; it did not
ignore possible environment protection resulting from the plants construction. It
decided that it could rely on standards other than those provided in National
Environmental Policy Act, 1970. In the another case of Duke Power Co. V. Carolina
Environmental Study Group 438 U.S. 59 (1978) in 1973 Duke power Company and
Nuclear regulatory Commission claiming that the Price Anderson Act was
unconstitutional and asking that construction be halted on the plant. This opinion was
wrong, Justice Warren Burger decide the case and given a decision that the Price
Anderson Act, 1957 was not Unconstitutional. An another case, Nuclear Energy
Institute, Inc. V. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Courts of Appeals for the
Districts of Columbia Circuit No. 01-1258 (2004) The case heard by the United State
Court and Decided that Yucca Mountain not as a waste disposal site.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
2105
Research Articles
[8]
Anil Kakodkar, Energy in India for the Coming Decades 1 Vol. 1, Energy
India 1 (2012).
[9] Faabrizio Iaccarina, Nuclear Renaissance in Italy Maintaining Momentum
85 Vol.1, Nuclear Law Bulletin 65 (2010).
[10] Marie Cletienne, International Court of Justice on Protection on
Transboundary Damage and its consequence on Nuclear Law 86 Vol. 2,
Nuclear Law Bulletin 59 (2010).
[11] Sam Emmerichts, Environment Law and Nuclear Law: A Growing
Symbiosis 82 Nuclear Law Bulletin 91 (2008).
[12] Selma Kus, International Nuclear Law 25 year in between Chernobyl and
Fuckushimahttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/oecneakaa/5kg1zqxhfcls.htmo
n visited on 11 November, 2013.
2106
Harinder Singh