Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A review of the mathematical models for predicting the heat and mass
transfer process in the liquid desiccant dehumidier
Yimo Luo, Hongxing Yang n, Lin Lu, Ronghui Qi
Renewable Energy Research Group (RERG), Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 22 August 2013
Received in revised form
12 November 2013
Accepted 20 December 2013
Available online 21 January 2014
The paper aims to overview various mathematical models for modeling the simultaneous heat and mass
transfer process in the liquid desiccant dehumidier. Firstly, the dehumidication principle is introduced
briey. Then the models are interpreted in terms of two classes of dehumidiers. For the adiabatic
dehumidier, the models are mainly classied into three types: nite difference model, effectiveness NTU
(NTU) model, and simplied models. For the internally cooled dehumidier, there are also three kinds
of models: models without considering liquid lm thickness, models considering uniform liquid lm
thickness, and models considering variable liquid lm thickness. This review is meaningful for
comprehending the development process and research status of the models and choosing suitable
models for prediction. In addition, some suggestions are proposed for the model improvement.
& 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Liquid desiccant dehumidier
Heat and mass transfer
Mathematical model
Contents
1.
2.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Problem description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
The mechanism of heat and mass transfer in liquid desiccant dehumidier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
Structure of the dehumidier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Models for adiabatic dehumidier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.
Finite difference model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
Effectiveness NTU (NTU) model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.
The simplied models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Models for internally cooled dehumidier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.
Models without considering liquid lm thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.
Models considering uniform liquid lm thickness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3.
Models considering variable liquid lm thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.4.
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
587
588
588
589
589
589
591
592
593
594
594
595
596
597
597
598
598
1. Introduction
n
Corresponding author at: Ofce ZN 816, Department of Building Services
Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. Tel.:
852 2766 5863.
E-mail address: hong-xing.yang@polyu.edu.hk (H. Yang).
1364-0321/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.009
588
Nomenclature
A
CP
Csat
dh
Dm
Dt
g
G
G0
h
he
he,eff
H
k
L
Le
m
m*
M
NTU
Nu
P
Pa
Ps
Pt
P
Q
T
T
u
V
W
We
We,eff
X
Xw
Xv
Greek letters
C
0C
D
a0D
HE
Subscripts
a
c
f
i
int
o
p
r
s
v
air
critical
cooling uid, like water, air, refrigerant
inlet
interface
outlet
primary air
secondary (return air)
desiccant solution
water vapor
2. Problem description
2.1. The mechanism of heat and mass transfer in liquid desiccant
dehumidier
It is well know that in the dehumidier, complicated heat and
mass transfer occurs. The driving force for heat transfer is the
temperature difference between the air and desiccant solution,
and for mass transfer is the water vapor pressure difference
between the air and the surface of the desiccant solution. The
most classic and typical mass transfer theories include lm theory,
penetration theory and surface renewal theory. The theory used
most for the dehumidier is the lm theory. It is Nernset [8] who
proposed the lm theory rst in 1904. He assumed that the whole
resistance of mass transfer in a given phase lied in a thin and
stagnant region of that phase at the interface. This region is called
lm. Based on it, Whiteman [9] developed the two-lm theory.
Interface
Gas
Film
PB
589
Liquid
Film
There are mainly three types of mathematical models, including the nite difference model, effectiveness NTU (NTU) model
and the simplied solutions.
Gas phase
PB,int
XB,int
Liquid
phase
XB
590
constant across the differential element, which meant the gradients only exist at the z direction, (4) both of the heat and moisture
transfer areas were equal to the specic surface area of the
packing, (5) it was negligible of the non-uniformity of the air
and solution ows, (6) in the ow direction, no heat and moisture
Ga C p;v dW=dz
1 expGa C p;v dW=dz=C;a A
where C,a and 0C;a are the heat transfer coefcient (sensible) of
the gas side and that coefcient corrected for simultaneous mass
and heat transfer by applying the Ackermann correction, which is
one method to take into account the effect of mass transfer on the
temperature prole with an Ackermann correction factor.
Finally, the boundary conditions were: z 0 Ts Ts,i, Gs Gs,i,
XXi; z H, Ta Ta,i, Ga Ga,i, WWi.
Since the above differential equations cannot be solved analytically, the most basic solution is a numerical integration along the
height of the dehumidier. To begin the calculation, one end of the
dehumidier must be chosen as the start point. For the countercurrent ow pattern, it needs to presume the outlet conditions for
one of the uids. Solving the above equations from the bottom to
the top of the dehumidier, with the boundary conditions, a set of
calculated inlet solution parameters are obtained. By comparing
the calculation results with the real values, the supposed existing
L z
Desiccant
Ga dW D;a AW e Wdz
as,
y
Air
x
Fig. 5. Schematic of the cross ow dehumidier/regenerator [39].
0
(1,1) (2,1) (3,1)
(i,1)
(M,1)
(i,2)
(M,2)
(i,3)
(M,3)
(i,j)
(M,j)
(1,N) (2,N)(3,N)
(I,N)
(M,N)
By substituting Eqs. (6) and (7) to (5), the air enthalpy change
along the ow direction was obtained. Here it is rewritten in a
simpler way appeared in the later literature,
ha NTU U Le
1
he ha
1 U W e W
8
H
Le
z
NTU
D AV
G0a
9
10
In this way, the coupled heat and mass transfer were considered together. In the following research, this handling method is
more popular than the Ackermann correction.
The nite difference model has been widely used for the
countercurrent dehumidier [3538]. For cross ow conguration,
Liu et al. [39] proposed a model for the heat and mass transfer
process in a cross ow adiabatic liquid desiccant dehumidier/
regenerator. The physical and mathematical models are described
in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively.
The governing equations of energy, water content, and solute
mass balances in a differential element were,
H
x
Fig. 6. A two dimensional schematic of the cross ow dehumidier/regenerator
[39].
solution variables are adjusted. The calculation will last until the
nal results are very close to the real values. And the general
calculation owchart for the nite difference model of the counter
ow pattern can be summarized in Fig. 4.
In the later study, Gandhidasan et al. [30] utilized the similar
model to study various parameters on the packing height of
the packed tower. Then, Lazzarin et al. [31] gave more specic
explanation of the calculation method in Appendix A of the literature. Oberg and Goswami [32] applied a nite difference model
similar to Factor and Grossman0 s to verify the experimental results.
Taking account the insufciently wetted packing and the different
factor when transfer the k-type mass transfer coefcients to the Ftype one, Fumo and Goswami [33] improved Oberg and Goswami0 s
mathematical model by modifying the transfer surface. In addition, a
correction factor CF was introduced to modify the correlation of the
wetting surface. By comparing the results of simulation and experiment, it was found that the calculation results of the adapted model
agreed well with experimental results.
All of the above models introduced a coefcient 0C;a to describe
the simultaneous heat and mass transfer with the Ackermann
correction. Khan and Ball [34] promoted another solution to deal
with the simultaneous transfer process. Both heat and mass
transfer processes were assumed to be gas controlled, so the
interface temperature was the temperature of the bulk liquid
and the heat transfer rate across the air lm from the bulk air to
the interface was equal to that entering the liquid side,
Ga C p;a dT a C;a AT s T a dz
591
G0a ha 1 G0s hs
0
U
U
x
H z L
11
G0a W 1 G0s
U
U
0
H z L x
12
dG0s U X 0
13
The energy and mass transfer in the interface of the air and
desiccant solution were expressed in Eq. (8) and the following
Eq. (14),
W NTU
U W e W
z
L
14
592
1 e NTU1 m
1 mn e NTU1mn
15
G0a C sat
G0s;i C p;s
16
17
ha;o ha;i
ha;i
1 e NTU
18
19
(8) With the mass balance and known inlet and outlet parameters,
all of the outlet parameters were acquired.
In the later study, Sadasivam and Balakrishnan [44] pointed out
that the denition of NTU based on the gas mass velocity in
Stevens0 s model was not appropriate when the minimum ow
capacity was the liquid [45]. Thus, the gas mass velocity G0a in
Eq. (10) was changed to the minimal mass velocity of gas and
liquid.
As for the NTU model, there are much fewer literatures than
the nite difference model. In the following study, Ren [46]
developed the analytical expressions for the NTU model with
perturbation technique. The model accounted for the nonlinearities of air humidity ratio and enthalpy in equilibrium with
solutions, the water loss of evaporation and the variation of the
solution specic heat capacity.
3.3. The simplied models
It can be found that both the nite difference model and NTU
model require numerical and iterative computations. Thus, both of
them are not suitable for hourly performance evaluation.
Khan and Ball [34] developed a simplied algebraic model.
With the nite difference model, about 1700 groups of data were
analyzed. The following functions were deduced,
W o n0 n1 W i n2 T s;i n3 T 2s;i
20
W o m0 m1 W i m2 T a;o m3 T 2a;o
21
Mv
Gs
U PP a;i P s;i C p;s T s;o T s;i
Ma P t
Ga
22
mP t M a
Ga P M v
23
In addition, the desiccant outlet temperature was easily calculated, as shown in the equation,
T s;o
T s;i HE T c;i
1 HE
24
26
K e Le U C p;a U T s U W e
27
593
Table 1
Comparison of the mathematical models for adiabatic dehumidier.
Classication
Assumption
Iteration
Accuracy
Applied situation
Least
More
Most
Extensive
Less
No
Best
Better
Worst
Table 2
Detail information of the mathematical models for adiabatic dehumidier.
Classication
Model
Flow pattern
Dimensionality
Counter
Counter
Counter
Counter
Cross
One-dimensional
One-dimensional
One-dimensional
One-dimensional
Two-dimensional
Ackermann correction
Introduction of enthalpy
Ackermann correction
Ackermann correction
Introduction of enthalpy
NTU model
Counter
One-dimensional
Introduction of enthalpy
Classication
Model
Flow pattern
Simplied method
Simplied models
Counter
Counter or cross
Counter
Counter or concurrent
Counter
Counter
Cross
dimensionless and dimensional groups, the conventional equations of one-dimensional model were transferred to two coupled
ordinary differential equations, whose general solution are as
follows,
W M C 1 e1 NTU z C 2 e2 NTU z
29
K 1 C 1 e1 NTU z K 2 C 2 e2 NTU z
30
The model is just suitable for the case where the solution ow
rate and concentration change slightly as it assumed that the
variation of the equilibrium humidity ratio of solution depended
only on the change of the solution temperature.
Babakhani and Soleymani developed analytical models for the
counter ow adiabatic regenerator [53] and dehumidier [54]. The
analytical solution was deduced on the basis of the differential
equations, including the mass balance, air humidity and temperature change equations listed in (1)(3), and liquid desiccant
temperature and concentration change derived from the mass
and energy conservation equations. To achieve the simplication,
two main assumptions were applied, including the assumptions of
the dilute gas phase and constant equilibrium humidity ratio on
the interface. Then the above equations could be solved and the
integrated analytical solution were,
W W int W i W int exp MNTU z
T a C 1 C 2 exp NTU z
Ts
M2 M
31
exp MNTU z
32
1
M
exp MNTU z T a
C 2 exp NTU z
Rc Le
M2 M
33
34
35
With the above solutions, the proles of the outlet solution and air
parameters were available.
Based on the above model, Babakhani [55] also developed
another analytical model which was well suited to the high
desiccant ow rate conditions.
Liu et al. [56] developed an analytical solution for a similar
cross-ow packed bed liquid desiccant air dehumidier, whose
numerical model had been reported in literature [39]. In the
present work, it was regarded that the desiccant mass ow rate
and concentration kept constant in the whole process. Thus the
Eqs. (12)(14) were got rid of, and only Eqs. (8) and (11) were left
for calculation, which were rewritten as
mn U
ha H he
U
0
z L x
ha
NTU
U ha he
L
z
36
37
594
Secondary
air stream
Primary air
stream
Water spray
P.H.E
4. Models for internally cooled dehumidier
In the internally cooled dehumidier, some cooling uid is
introduced to remove the heat produced by the vapor condensation, as shown in Fig. 7 [61]. Most of the models for the internally
cooled dehumidier are developed upon the nite difference
methods used for the adiabatic dehumidier. The difference is
the additional consider of the heat transfer brought by the cooling
media. In addition, because of the relatively low solution ow rate
in the internally cooled dehumidier, it is easier for the solution to
form a thin lm on the surface of the padding wall or plate. Briey,
there are also three types of models for the internally cooled
dehumidier.
Primary
air stream
Secondary
air stream
Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of the cross-ow type plate heat exchanger [61].
Centreline
Desiccant
solution
Thin
plate
Q
Primary air
dx
Centreline
Q
dy
Thin
plate
Water
D Secondary air
Fig. 7. Heat and moisture exchange model in the internally cooled dehumidier
[61].
Fig. 9. Schematic diagram of the control volumes considered: (a) primary airsolution; (b) secondary airwater [63].
595
he;s ha;p
1 UW e;s W p
38
Les
dx
H
dW p NTU s
UW e;s W p
dx
H
39
dW p dG0s
0
dx
dx
40
G0a;p U
dha;p dG0s hs
Q 0
dx
dx
41
he;f ha;r
1 U W e;f W r
42
Lef
dy
H
dW r NTU f
U W e;f W r
dx
H
43
G0a;r U
dW dGf
0
dy
dy
44
G0a;r U
0
dha;r dGf hf
Q 0
dy
dy
45
0 L T f
ha G0s hs
C p;f Gf
x
H y
x
46
U T s T f
y
L
47
Fig. 10. Schematic diagram of the control volume for a counter-ow internally
cooled dehumidier [21].
596
48
T s
2 T s
Dt;s 2
x
y1
49
X w
2 X w
us
Dm;s 2
x
y1
50
0 s
us
us
dP
2 ua
0 a 2
dz
y2
51
ua
T a
2 T a
Dt;a 2
z
y2
52
ua
X v
2 X v
Dm;a 2
z
y2
53
ks
3G0s 2y y2
2s 2 3
ua us
s Dm;s
The above equations can be discretized along the three different directions. Being combined with the boundary and interfacial
conditions, the equations could be solved.
Ali et al. [6769] had used the same mathematical model to
study the effect of the ow conguration, the inclination angle, the
Reynolds numbers, various inlet parameters, cu-ultrane particles
volume fraction, and thermal dispersion on the performance of the
dehumidier/regenerator.
Mesquita et al. [70] compared three different numerical models
for parallel plate internally cooled liquid desiccant dehumidier.
The second one introduced a constant lm thickness. It was
assumed that the wall was isothermal so that the water ow
could be neglected. On the basis of some other assumptions, the
dehumidication process could be described by a two dimensional
model, as shown in Fig. 12. Being different from the rst model
which does not consider the lm thickness, this model took the
momentum equations into consideration. Firstly, the velocity
proles of the air and liquid desiccant were obtained with the
momentum equations, presented as follows,
0 1=3
3Gs s
56
s g
X w
X v
a Dm;a
y1
y2
54
T s
T a
X v
ka
a Dm;a
y1
y2
y2
55
dP 1 1 2
W
y 2
y
dx a 2
2
"
#
dP
us
G0a
3a
dx
W=22 2a W=23
57
58
59
W/2
Fin surface
Y1
Symmetric plate
Y2
X(TEG solution flow direction)
Fig. 11. Schematic diagram of control volume for a three-dimensional model [26].
Fig. 12. Schematic diagram of control volume for a two-dimensional model [70].
597
Table 3
Detail information of the mathematical models for internally cooled dehumidier.
Classication
Model
Cooling uid
Regardless of lm thickness
Counter
Counter
Six different congurations
Cocurrent
Cross
Four possible ow arrangements
Counter
Cross
Uniform lm thickness
Cross
Cocurrent/counter/cross
Counter
Cross
Cross
Counter
R22
Water
Variable lm thickness
Counter
Cross
Counter
Cocurrent
Counter
Water
another variable thickness model for internally cooled liquiddesiccant dehumidiers. In the model, the lm thickness in
Eq. (56) varied, thus for every step of calculation, the lm
thickness was recalculated, so was the liquid velocity prole in
Eq. (57). However, to reduce the computational time, the change in
the airow velocity prole was neglected as a result of the small
lm thickness changes. Compared the results of variable thickness
model with the constant thickness model, it was found that the
two models converged to the same results at higher desiccant ow
rates. However, the constant thickness model underestimated the
dehumidication for low desiccant ow rates.
Hueffed et al. [72] presented a simplied model for a parallelplate dehumidier, with both adiabatic and isothermal absorption.
The model used a control volume approach and accounted for
the lm thickness variation by imposing its effect on the heat
and mass transfer coefcients. The specic equations of the heat
transfer coefcient in terms of the lm thickness were listed as
Nuka
dh
60
dh 2W 2
61
Cocurrent
Cross
598
have certain discrepancy with the reality. The second one consider
the effect of the velocity eld, but the assumption of the steady
state and fully developed eld cannot describe the real condition,
especially for low desiccant mass ow rate. The nal model is most
accurate as it comprehensively regards the inuence of the
changed velocity eld, but the calculation becomes relatively
complicated.
Though a large amount of researches have been conducted on
modeling and analyzing the liquid desiccant dehumidier, further
efforts are still needed:
(1) The vast majority of the previous models assume the heat and
mass transfer process to be steady state and more transient
models to study the dynamic performance are needed.
(2) More three-dimensional models close to the reality are
needed.
(3) Most of the models focus on the outlet parameters and more
research are required to study the heat and mass transfer
process in the dehumidier interior.
(4) It needs to take into consideration the effect of variable
physical properties which are taken as constant in almost all
existing models.
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper was supported by the Hong
Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme.
References
[1] Jiang Y. Current building energy consumption in China and effective energy
efciency measures. Heat Vent Air Cond 2005;35:3040 (in Chinese).
[2] Ge GM, Xiao F, Niu XF. Control strategies for a liquid desiccant air-conditioning
system. Energy Build 2011;43(6):1499507.
[3] Liu XH, Li Z, Lin BR. Annual performance of liquid desiccant based independent humidity control HVAC system. Appl Ther Eng 2006;26(1112):
1198207.
[4] Potnis SV, Lenz TG. Dimensionless mass-transfer correlations for packed-bed
liquid desiccant contactors. Ind Eng Chem Res 1996;35(11):418593.
[5] Oberg V, Goswami DY. Advances in solar energy: an annual review of research
and development. Am Sol Energy Soc Inc. 1998;12:43170.
[6] Xie XY, Jiang Y, Tang YD, Yi XQ, Liu SQ. Simulation and experimental analysis
of a fresh air-handling unit with liquid desiccant sensible and latent heat
recovery. Build Simulation 2008;1:5363.
[7] Jiang Y, Li Z. Dehumidication air conditioning method and systems; 2002.
(in Chinese)
[8] Nernst W. Theory of reaction velocity in heterogenous systems. Z Phys Chem
1904;47:525.
[9] Whitman W. The two-lm theory of gas absorption. Chem Metall Eng 1923;29
(4):1468.
[10] Lowenstein AI, Gabruk RS. The effect of absorber design on the performance of
a liquid-desiccant air conditioner. ASHRAE Trans 1992:71270 (Symposia).
[11] Kesslling W, Laevemann E, Kapfhammer C. Energy storage for desiccant
cooling systems component development. Sol Energy 1998;64:20921.
[12] Zhao Y, Shi MH. Comparison of dehumidier in solar liquid desiccant airconditioner system. Acta Energiae Sol Sin 2002;23(1):14 (in Chinese).
[13] Factor HM, Grossman GA. packed bed dehumidier/regenerator for solar air
conditioning with liquid desiccants. Sol Energy 1980;24(6):54150.
[14] Sadasivam M, Balakrishnan AR. Experimental investigation on the thermal
effects in packed-bed liquid desiccant dehumidiers. Ind Eng Chem Res
1994;33(6):163640.
[15] Chung TW, Wu H. Mass transfer correlation for dehumidication of air in a
packed absorber with an inverse u-shaped tunnel. Sep Sci Technol 2000;35
(10):150315.
[16] Longo GA, Gasparella A. Experimental analysis on chemical dehumidication
of air by liquid desiccant and desiccant regeneration in a packed tower. J Sol
Energy Eng 2004;126(1):58791.
[17] Yang Y. Experimental study on the characteristic of liquid dehumidication
system [Master thesis]. Tianjing University; 1999. (in Chinese).
[18] Chung TW, Ghosh TK, Hines AL, Novosel D. Dehumidication of moist air with
simultaneous removal of selected indoor pollutants by triethylene glycol
solutions in a packed-bed absorber. Sep Sci Technol 1995;30(7):180732.
[19] Elsarrag E, Magzoub EEM, Jain S. Mass-transfer correlations for dehumidication of air by triethylene glycol in a structured packed column. Ind Eng Chem
Res 2004;43:767681.
[20] Khan AY. Cooling and dehumidication performance analysis of internallycooled liquid desiccant absorbers. Appl Ther Eng 1998;18(5):26581.
[21] Liu XH, Chang XM, Xia JJ, Jiang Y. Performance analysis on the internally
cooled dehumidier using liquid desiccant. Build Environ 2009;44:299308.
[22] Bansal P, Jain S, Moon C. Performance comparison of an adiabatic and an
internally cooled structured packed-bed dehumidier. Appl Ther Eng
2011;31:149.
[23] Chung TW, Wu H. Comparison between spray towers with and without n
coils for air dehumidication using triethylene glycol solutions and development of the mass-transfer correlations. Ind Eng Chem Res 2000;39:207684.
[24] Yin YG, Zhang XS, Wang G, Luo L. Experimental study on a new internally
cooled/heated dehumidier/regenerator of liquid desiccant systems. Int J
Refrig 2008;31:85766.
[25] Yin YG, Zhang XS, Peng DG, Li XW. Model validation and case study on
internally cooled/heated dehumidier/regenerator of liquid desiccant systems. Int J Ther Sci 2009;48:166471.
[26] Park MS, Howell JR, Vliet GC, Peterson J. Numerical and experimental results
for coupled heat and mass transfer between a desiccant lm and air in crossow. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1994;37(Suppl):395402.
[27] Qin F, Shao SQ, Luo YM, Tian CQ, Zhang GY. Investigation of performance of
n-tube internally heated regenerator in liquid desiccant air conditioning
system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on applied energy,
Suzhou, China; 2012.
[28] Khan AY, Sulsona FL. Modelling and parametric analysis of heat and mass
transfer performance of refrigerant cooling liquid desiccant absorbers. Int J
Energy Res 1998;22(9):8312.
[29] Jain S, Bansal PK. Performance analysis of liquid desiccant dehumidication
systems. Int J Refrig 2007;30:86172.
[30] Gandhidasan P, Ullah MR, Kettleborough CF. Analysis of heat and mass
transfer between a desiccant-air system in a packed tower. J Sol Energy Eng
1987;109:8993.
[31] Lazzarin RM, Gasparella A, Longo GA. Chemical dehumidication by liquid
desiccants: theory and experiment. Int J Refrig 1999;22:33447.
[32] Oberg V, Goswami DY. Experimental study of the heat and mass transfer in a
packed bed liquid desiccant air dehumidier. J Sol Energy Eng 1998;120
(4):28997.
[33] Fumo N, Goswami DY. Study of an aqueous lithium chloride desiccant system:
air dehumidication and desiccant regeneration. Sol energy 2002;62(4):
35161.
[34] Khan AY, Ball HD. Development of a generalized model for performance
evaluation of packed-type liquid sorbent dehumidiers and regenerators.
ASHRAE Trans 1992;98:52533.
[35] Gandhidasan P, Kettleborough CF, Ullah MR. Calculation of heat and mass
transfer coefcients in a packed tower operating with a desiccant-air contact
system. J Sol Energy Eng 1986;108:1238.
[36] Elsayed MM, Gari HN, Radhwan AM. Effectiveness of heat and mass transfer in
packed beds of liquid desiccant system. Renewable Energy 1993;3(6/7):6618.
[37] Luo YM, Shao SQ, Xu HB, Tian CQ. Dehumidication performance of [EMIM]
BF4. Appl Ther Eng 2011;31(1415):27727.
[38] Luo YM, Shao SQ, Qin F, Tian CQ, Yang HX. Investigation of feasibility of ionic
liquids used in solar liquid desiccant air conditioning system. Sol Energy
2012;86:271824.
[39] Liu XH, Jiang Y, Qu KY. Heat and mass transfer model of cross ow liquid
desiccant
air
dehumidier/regenerator.
Energy
Convers
Manage
2007;48:54654.
[40] Niu RP. Modeling and numerical simulation of dehumidier using LiCl
solution as the liquid desiccant. in: Proceedings of the international conference on electrical engineering and automatic control, Shandong; 2010.
[41] Woods J, Kozubal E. A desiccant-enhanced evaporative air conditioner:
numerical model and experiments. Energy Convers Manage 2012;65:20820.
[42] Stevens DI, Braun JE, Klein SA. An effectiveness model of liquid-desiccant
system heat/mass exchangers. Sol Energy 1989;42(6):44955.
[43] Braun JE. Methodologies for the design and control of chilled water systems
[Ph.D. thesis in Mechanical Engineering], University of Wisconsin-Madison;
1988.
[44] Sadasivam M, Balakrishnan AR. Effectiveness-NTU method for design of
packed bed liquid desiccant dehumidiers. Chem Eng Res Des 1992;70:5727.
[45] Jaber H, Webb RL. Design of cooling towers by the effectiveness-NTU method.
J Heat Transfer 1989;111:83743.
[46] Ren CQ. Corrections to the simple effectiveness-NTU method for counterow
cooling towers and packed bed liquid desiccantair contact systems. Int J Heat
Mass Transfer 2008;51:23745.
[47] Liu XH, Qu KY, Jiang Y. Empirical correlations to predict the performance of
the dehumidier using liquid desiccant in heat and mass transfer. Renewable
Energy 2006;31:162739.
[48] Gandhidasan P. A simplied model for air dehumidication with liquid
desiccant. Sol Energy 2004;76:40916.
[49] Gandhidasan P. Reconcentration of aqueous solutions in a packed bed: a
simple approach. Trans ASME J Sol Energy Eng 1990;112:26872.
[50] Kim KJ, Ameel TA, Wood BD. Performance evaluation of LiCl and LiBr for
absorber design applications in the open-cycle absorption refrigeration
system. Trans ASME J Sol Energy Eng 1997;119:16573.
[51] Chen XY, Li Z, Jiang Y, Qu KY. Analytical solution of adiabatic heat and mass
transfer process in packed-type liquid desiccant equipment and its application. Sol Energy 2006;80:150916.
[52] Ren CQ, Jiang Y, Zhang YP. Simplied analysis of coupled heat and mass
transfer processes in packed bed liquid desiccant-air contact system.
Sol Energy 2006;80(1):12131.
[53] Babakhani D, Soleymani M. Simplied analysis of heat and mass transfer
model in liquid desiccant regeneration process. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng
2006;41:150916.
[54] Babakhani D, Soleymani M. An analytical solution for air dehumidication by
liquid desiccant in a packed column. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer
2009;36:96977.
[55] Babakhani D. Developing an application analytical solution of adiabatic heat
and mass transfer processes in a liquid desiccant dehumidier/regenerator.
Chem Eng Technol 2009;32(12):187584.
[56] Liu XH, Jiang Y, Qu KY. Analytical solution of combined heat and mass transfer
performance in a cross-ow packed bed liquid desiccant air dehumidier. Int J
Heat Mass Transfer 2008;51:456372.
[57] Nusselt W. Der Warmeubergang im Kreuzstrom. Z Ver Dtsch Ing 1911;55:
20214.
[58] Nusselt W. Eine neue Formel fur den Warmedurchgang im Kreuzstrom.
Tech Meahanik Thermodynamik 1930;1:41722.
[59] Wang XL, Cai WJ, Lu JG, Sun YX, Ding XD. A hybrid dehumidier model for
real-time performance monitoring, control and optimization in liquid desiccant dehumidication system. Appl Energy 2013;111:44955.
[60] Park JY, Jeong JWA. Simplied model for predicting dehumidication effectiveness of a liquid desiccant system. AEI 2013:51623.
[61] Ren CQ, Tu M, Wang HH. An analytical model for heat and mass transfer
processes in internally cooled or heated liquid desiccant-air contact units. Int J
Heat Mass Transfer 2007;50:354555.
[62] Khan AY, Martinez JL. Modelling and parametric analysis of heat and mass
transfer performance of a hybrid liquid desiccant absorber. Energy Convers
Manage 1998;39(10):1095112.
599