Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1, First Author
Abstract
A fabricated concrete foundation for tower crane has been proposed in this article, according to
lots of limitations of traditional in-situ concrete foundation. The fabricated concrete foundation
composed with 13 fabricated blocks and combined by steel strands, which bearing the vertical force,
horizontal force, twist moment and bending moment induced by tower crane, characterized with
combined, decomposed, transited and repeated use. Based on the finite element method, the
deformation of foundation block and ground has been further studied. It is worth to do more research
and extension on fabricated concrete foundation of tower crane.
934
also could be combined, decomposed, transited and repeated use, which has been applied for
patent of China successfully [13].
0
(1)
A
W
3.52
3.53
4
Where pmin is the minimal base pressure of foundation, N is vertical load of tower crane, G is gravity
of foundation, A is the basal area of foundation, M is the bending moment of tower crane, W is the
sectional resistance moment of foundation.
The pressure of foundation would be readjust and redistribute for pmin 0 could not valued in reality.
After readjustment, pmin 0 , and the maximal base pressure of foundation p max calculated as:
2920
M
1.55 m, a=3.5-1.55=1.95 m
e
N G 1878
2N G
2 1878
(2)
91.72kPa
pmax
3la
3 1.95 7
Where e is the eccentric distance of composite force, l is the length of foundation, a is the distance
between application point of composite force and fringe of foundation.
pmin
0
(3)
A
W
3.52
3.53
4
The pressure of foundation would be readjust and redistribute for pmin 0 could not valued in
reality. After readjustment, pmin 0 , and the maximal base pressure of foundation p max calculated as:
3298
M
1.83 m , a=3.5-1.83=1.67 m
e
N G 1798
2 N G
2 1798
(4)
102.5kPa
pmax
3la
3 1.67 7
pmin
935
According to the two conditions mentioned above, the maximal base pressure of
foundation pmax102.5kPa . pmax 1.2 f a 156kPa , so the circular section with diameter of 7.0
m could agree with the need of QTZ125 tower crane during estimation.
Foundation bolt
Convex and concave parts
Foundation bolt
Block C
Block B
Block A
936
1.2
2.8
4.2
4.2
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.7
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.71
3.27
3.06
1.488
1.80
1.30
1.26
37.2
45.0
32.5
31.5
(5)
Fv Fg
3
pB
2( Fv Fg )
(6)
pB
3bl
Where FV is the vertical load of foundation, Fh is the horizontal load of foundation, Fg is the gravity
of foundation, p B is the compressive stress under foundation, [ p B ] is the allowable compressive stress
under foundation, b is the width of foundation. The basal area of foundation could be checked as
following:
(a) Working condition:
b 6. 6
2380 480 40 1.5
e
2.26m
2.20m , which unsatisfied equation (5).
820 473
3
3
(b) Non working condition:
b 6. 6
3200 65 1.5
e
2.72m
2.20m , which unsatisfied equation (5).
740 473
3
3
Additional weight is needs to improve the stress condition foundation in order to satisfy
equation (5). According to the specification of tower crane, 520.0 kN additional weight should be layaside at top of foundation uniformly. It could be divided as 24 rectangular solids, each weighted 22.0
kN, total weighted as 2422=528.0 kN, uniformly arranged in the four sector of top foundation. Then,
the total weight of foundation including additional weight is G473+5281001 kN.
In a certain degree, the non working condition is the control condition. Now the basal area of
foundation could be rechecked for non work condition as following:
b 6.6
3200 65 1.5
e
1.89 m
2.20m which satisfied equation (5).
3
3
740 1001
2(740 1001)
124.7 kPa p B =130kPa, which satisfied equation (6).
pB
3 6.6 (3.3 1.89)
937
Therefore, the foundation with circular section with diameter of 7.0 m proposed in this article
could agree with the bearing capacity of 130kPa of ground. Considering the convenience of
construction and transport, the 520.0 kN additional weight could be divided as 24 pieces of
2.0m1.0m0.45m concrete blocks. Some other existing equal ponderous object could also be used as
additional weight certainly.
The comparative analysis between fabricated concrete and in-situ concrete foundation of tower
crane is showed in table 2. It can be found the weight of fabricated concrete foundation (additional
weight excepted) is less than that of in-situ concrete foundation.
Table.2 Comparative analysis between fabricated concrete and in-situ concrete foundation
5m5m1.1m In-situ
6m6m1.1m In-situ
The design proposed in this
Type
concrete foundation
article(additional weight excepted)
concrete foundation
weight/kN
473.0
690.0
990.0
In addition, when the bearing capacity of ground is bigger than 130 kPa, the additional weight
could be reduced. The relationship between ground bearing capacity and additional weight for
foundation is showed in table 2. In order to enhance the stability of foundation of tower crane, it is
strongly suggested that additional weight should no be less than 150.0 kN. The aerial view of
fabricated concrete foundation of tower crane with additional weight proposed in this article is showed
in figure 4.
Table. 3 Relationship between ground bearing capacity and additional weight of foundation
fa / kPa
130
150
170
190
210
Additional weight / kN
528.0
281.0
181.0
122.0
81.0
Note: it is strongly suggested that additional weight should no be less than 150.0 kN
230
52.0
Figure 4. Aerial view of fabricated concrete foundation of tower crane with additional weight
938
Foundation bolt
Table. 4 Relationship between coefficient of friction and axis force of steel wires
Coefficient of friction
0.2
2075
0.3
1384
0.4
1038
0.5
830
0.6
692
0.7
593
Tests should carry out to define the exact value of coefficient of friction between each block,
which needs much manpower, resources and cost. In fact, it is safety to assign coefficient of friction
with a low value. According to lots of references, coefficient of friction 0.3 is used in this article, so
axis force of steel strands of 1384 kN needed from table 4. Now the number of steel strands is to be
calculated further.
Unbonded prestressed steel strands are to be used, with the character of 1 7 standard form,
nominal diameter d 15.2mm , nominal cross section area Ap 139mm 2 and normal value of
strength f ptk 1860 N/mm 2 .The tension control stress of steel strands con could be valued
as con 0.65 f ptk conservatively, that is: con 0.65 f ptk 0.65 1860 1209 N/mm 2 .
Loss of prestress includes 3 parts, as described as following:
(1) l1 , loss of prestress induced by deformation of anchor device and steel strands
5
a
l1 E
1.95 10 5 147.7 N/mm 2
6600
l
Where: a is the value of deformation of anchor device and steel strands, according to the
code a 5 mm . l is he length of steel strands, l 6.6 m 6600 mm . E is the elastic ratio of steel
strands, E 1.95 10 5 N/mm 2 .
(2) l 2 , loss of prestress induced by friction neglected: l 2 0
939
(3) l 4,5 , loss of prestress induced by creep of concrete and looseness of steel strands,
pe between blocks is pe con l 1209 377.7 831.8N/mm 2 .The axis force of each steel
strand N1 is: N1 Ap1 pe 115550.7 N 115.56kN .
The total number of steel strands n could be confined as:
N
1384
n
11.96
N1 115.56
In order to enhance the stability of foundation and eliminate the influence of indeterminacy, the
total number of steel strands n 15 is to be used conservatively in this design.
There are 3 circular preformed holes in the cross beams of foundation, as showed in figure 2.
Seamless steel pipes with inner diameter 65 mm and wall thickness 3mm have been fixed in the
concrete to mold the performed holes. There is 1 preformed hole on the top of cross beams, and
the remained 2 preformed holes on the bottom of cross beams horizontally, as showed in figure
3. The 13 bocks could be combined with steel strands through the preformed holes. 5 steel
strands as a cluster is allocated at each preformed hole. It could be consult the corresponding
codes or books to know the technique and steps of how to combine13 fabricated bocks into a
whole with steel strands.
940
Steel strands at each hole would be tensioned arrive at the assigned axis force and fixed by
equipment. The distribution of horizontal stress in fabricated concrete foundation after combined by
steel strand is showed in figure 7. Due to there are 2 holes side by side allocated at the bottom of cross
beam, the force of bottom holes is twice of that at upside hole in FEM model. So it can be found the
horizontal stress around bottom holes is bigger than that of upside hole. The distribution of stress
vector in fabricated concrete foundation after combined by steel strand is showed in figure 8. It also
can be found the stress vector around bottom holes is bigger than that of upside hole. There is obvious
stress concentration around both ends of steel strands. In order to avoid local destroyed by stress
concentration, some measures should be used to disperse the stress around the ends of steel strands,
such as steel plate could buried at the neighbor of hole ends.
941
Therefore, the bending moment of tower crane is the key factor induced unbalance stress or strain
in fabricated concrete foundation, which also made the foundation in dangerous state. It is necessary to
reduce bending moment of tower crane at work condition or non working condition. The integrity of 13
fabricated blocks depends on the friction between each block and the effect of steel strand. The force at
supporting block should be delivered effectively to other blocks, and the whole fabricated foundation
should remain a big safety stock to deal with all kinds of dangerous conditions.
The vertical stress of ground during fabricated concrete foundation working is showed in figure
15. There is obvious stress difference in ground induced by tower crane. The value of stress difference
decreased with depth of ground increased.
Figure 15. Vertical stress of ground during fabricated concrete foundation working
Due to the uneven force distribute on different supporting blocks B, stress difference and stain
difference induced in fabricated concrete foundation, and stress difference and stain difference induced
in ground under foundation further. In order to eliminate the influence of stress difference in
foundation or ground, the integrity of 13 blocks combined with steel strands should be guaranteed and
strengthened effectively, and the bearing capacity of foundation should be large enough. So the
942
fabricated concrete foundation proposed in this article could be used in soft soil ground only when it
has been reinforced with foundation treatment method sufficiently.
In a word, enormous economic benefits can get by fabricated concrete foundation, which well
meeting with the aim of conservation-oriented society, development of circular economy and
energy saving. It is worth to do more research and extension on fabricated concrete foundation
of tower crane.
4. Conclusions
(1) Tower crane is absolutely necessarily machine in industry and civil construction. In-situ steel
concrete has been used to construct tower crane foundation usually, which have lots of limitations.
(2) A fabricated concrete foundation for tower crane has been proposed in this article, according to
lots of limitations of traditional in-situ concrete foundation. The fabricated concrete foundation
composed with 13 fabricated blocks and combined by steel strands, which bearing the vertical force,
horizontal force, twist moment and bending moment induced by tower crane, characterized with
combined, decomposed, transited and repeated use.
(3) The bending moment of tower crane is the key factor induced unbalance stress or strain in
fabricated concrete foundation, which also made the foundation in dangerous state. It is necessary to
reduce bending moment of tower crane at work condition or non working condition.
(4) The force at supporting block should be delivered effectively to other blocks. The integrity of
13 fabricated blocks depends on the friction between each block and the effect of steel strand. That is,
the axis force of steel strands should larger enough to generate frictional force to combine the 13
blocks into integrality effectively.
5. Acknowledgment
This work was financially supported by Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No.
1208085QE89).
6. References
[1] LIU Pei-heng, Forecasting about the market and technology of tower crane, Building Technique
Development, vol. 26, no.3, pp.42-44, 1999.
[2] LIU Pei-heng, The recent situation of development of tower crane in foreign, Architecture
Technology, vol.22, no.8, pp. 209-211, 2001.
[3] LIU Pei-heng, Instruction manual of tower crane, China Machine Press, China, 2002.
[4] YUE Chen-xi, CONG Wei-min, Technology of prefabricated concrete tower crane base,
Building Science, vol.21, no.5, pp. 92-95, 2005.
[5] ZHANG Shou-jun, CONG Wei-min, Finite element analysis on prefabricated concrete tower
crane base, Building Technique Development, vol.36, no.8, pp. 24-26, 2009.
[6] CAI Xue-feng, ZHOU Ji-zhong, DONG Zhi-li, Research and Development of Tower Crane
Foundation Designing system, Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology, vol.
2, no.1, pp. 63-66, 2005.
[7] CONG Wei-min, YUE Chen-xi, Discussion on Several Hot Spot Issues for Precast Concrete
Consolidated Foundation of Tower Crane, Jiangsu Architecture, Vol. 125, no.1, pp. 60-62, 2009.
[8] HE Xue-gong, FENG Gong-bing, SUN gang, Mechanical analysis and anti-rollover stability
calculation for tower crane cross type foundation, Construction Machinery, Vol. 29, no.1, pp. 2730, 2001.
[9] ZHANG Da-chang, JIANG Gang, LIN Zhi-tian, Experimental studies and calculating method
for compression and uplift capacities of fabricated steel foundation, Rock and Soil Mechanics,
vol.30, no.7, pp. 2096-2100, 2009.
[10] QIAN Zeng-zhen, LU Xian-long, DING Shi-jun, Experimental study of assembly foundation for
transmission line tower in Taklimakan desert, Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol.32, no.8, pp. 23592364, 2011.
[11] ZHAO Zheng-yi, The principle & main structure of the gin pole type mechanical plants built-up
943
944