Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Session: 2009-2013
Project Advisor
Engr.Usman Farooq
Group Members
Bilal Shafiq
09033123-058
Noman Arshad
09033123-056
Ahmad Zeeshan
09033123-005
09033123-019
Page 1
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Internal Examiner
Signature:
(Supervisor)
Name
External Examiner
Signature:
(Supervisor)
Name
Page 2
Page 3
DEDICATED TO
Our
beloved
parents
teachers
and
sincere
friends
whose
love
the
most
precious
Page 4
Contents
Acknowledgement ......................................................................................................................... 11
Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 12
Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 12
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5.1
1.5.2
1.5.3
1.5.5
1.5.6
1.5.7
1.5.8
1.5.9
1.6
1.6.1
1.6.2
1.6.3
1.6.4
1.6.5
1.6.6
1.6.7
Methanol as a solvent:................................................................................................ 22
Choice of Feedstock:...................................................................................................... 24
2.1.1
Biomass: ................................................................................................................. 24
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
Page 5
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
Chapter 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 31
Process Description........................................................................................................................ 31
3.1 Process Flow Sheet .............................................................................................................. 32
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
Chapter 4 ........................................................................................................................................ 38
Capacity Selection ......................................................................................................................... 38
4.1
4.2
4.3
Chapter # 5 ..................................................................................................................................... 43
Material and Energy Balance ......................................................................................................... 43
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.8
5.9
5.10
Page 6
5.11
Chapter 6 ........................................................................................................................................ 64
Designing of Gasifier ..................................................................................................................... 64
6.1
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.2
6.3
Specification Sheet......................................................................................................... 75
Chapter 7 ........................................................................................................................................ 76
Designing of Methanol Reactor ..................................................................................................... 76
7.1
Purpose: ......................................................................................................................... 77
7.2
7.3
Reactor types:................................................................................................................. 77
7.4
Designing ....................................................................................................................... 78
7.5
Specification Sheet......................................................................................................... 84
Chapter # 08 ................................................................................................................................... 85
Designing of Heat Exchanger ........................................................................................................ 85
Purpose........................................................................................................................................... 86
8.1
8.2
8.4
8.5
Designing ........................................................................................................................... 87
8.6
Specification Sheet............................................................................................................. 94
Chapter # 09 ................................................................................................................................... 95
Designing of Distillation Column .................................................................................................. 95
9.1
Purpose: ......................................................................................................................... 96
9.2
9.3
9.4
Construction ................................................................................................................... 97
9.4.1
9.4.2
Pitting ..................................................................................................................... 98
9.4.3
Effect of stress........................................................................................................ 98
Page 7
9.4.4
9.5
9.6
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.6.1
10.6.2
10.8
10.8.1
10.8.2
10.9
10.9.1
11.1.1
11.1.2
11.1.3
11.1.4
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.5.1
11.5.2
Page 8
11.5.3
11.5.4
11.5.5
11.5.6
11.6
11.7
11.8
Control loop around Waste Heat boiler ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
11.9
11.9.1
11.9.2
11.9.3
11.9.4
11.9.5
11.9.6
11.10
Control Loop around Flash Drum .............................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
12.6
12.7
13.2.1
13.2.2
13.2.3
Page 9
13.2.4
13.2.5
13.2.6
13.2.7
13.2.8
13.2.9
13.3
13.3.1
13.3.2
13.3.3
Page 10
Acknowledgement
All praises be to the "Allah Almighty "the most merciful, the most beneficent who guides
us in the darkness and helps us when despair surrounds us. Without His help one can't
reach ones destination. Undoubtedly these are His unlimited blessings that made us
complete this work. All respects and love for Prophet" Muhammad (PBUH) "who
enlightened our minds to recognize our creator.
We thank our dear parents, who brought us up, fed us and above all; made us educated.
Then we thank all our teachers who taught and guided us; and our dear friends who
encouraged us and moved us for the last four years. To our brothers and sisters who
stood by us and continue to stand by us because of their staunch belief in what we are
capable of.
We feel pleasure and deep sense of indebtedness for our teachers who have enriched the
text by their generous contribution. We express profound and cordial gratitude to our
learned, kind and experienced advisors Engr. Usman Farooq for his kind behavior,
constructive suggestions and all the way helpful supervision.
In the end, we thank all those who by any means helped us completing this project.
Page 11
Chapter 1
Introduction
Page 12
Methanol is a chemical building block used in making hundreds of products that touch
our daily lives. Methanol is also an emerging energy fuel for running our cars, trucks,
buses, and even electric power turbines. Methanol, also known as methyl alcohol or wood
alcohol is the simplest of all alcohols with the chemical formula CH3OH1.
Methanol is a light, colorless, flammable liquid at room temperature, and contains less
carbon and more hydrogen than any other liquid fuel. It is a stable biodegradable
chemical that is produced and shipped around the globe every day for a number of
industrial and commercial applications. Methanol occurs naturally in the environment,
and quickly breaks down in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions2.
The methanol industry spans the entire globe, with production in Asia, North and South
America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Worldwide, over 90 methanol plants have
a combined production capacity of about 75 million metric tons (almost 24 billion gallons
or 90 billion liters), and each day more than 100,000 tons of methanol is used as a
chemical feedstock or as a transportation fuel (33 million gallons or 125 million liters).
The global methanol industry generates $36 billion in economic activity each year, while
creating over 100,000 jobs around the globe.
This simple alcohol can be made from virtually anything that is, or ever was, a plant. This
includes common fossil fuels like natural gas and coal and renewable resources like
biomass, landfill gas, and even power plant emissions and CO2 from the
atmosphere.
no wonder that methanol has been one of the worlds most widely used industrial
chemicals since the 1800s.
1
2
www.methanol.org
See Appendix A for properties of methanol
Page 13
Events
1830
1905
1923
1927
Late 1940s
1966
1970
1973
1970s
1989
1990
Early 1990s
Pure methanol is an important material in chemical synthesis. Its derivatives are used in
great quantities for building up a vast number of compounds, among them many
important synthetic dyestuffs, resins, drugs, and perfumes. Large quantities are converted
to dimethyl aniline for dyestuffs and to formaldehyde for synthetic resins. It is also used
in automotive antifreezes, in rocket fuels, and as a general solvent.
Page 14
Methanol is a colorless liquid, completely miscible with water and organic solvents and is
very hygroscopic. It forms explosive mixtures with air and burns with a nonluminous
flame. It is a violent poison; drinking mixtures containing methanol has caused many
cases of blindness or death. Methanol has a settled odor.
32.04
Vapour Pressure
97 Torr at 20 0C
Refractive index
1.3284 at 20 0C
Density
Dielectric Constant
32.70 at 25 0C
Dipole moment
2.87 D at 20 0C
Solvent Group
5.1
Viscosity
0.59 cp at 20 0C
Surface Tension
Solubility in water
Flash point
11 0C
455 0C
Explosive limit
7-36%
Heat of formation
-210.3 MJ/kmol
Page 15
Critical pressure
81 bar
Critical volume
0.811 m3/kmol
Heat of Vaporization
35278 kJ/kmol
Melting Point
-97.7 0C
Boiling Point
65 0C
Relative Density
0.79
Formula
CH3OH
Molecular weight
32.042 kg/kmol
Heat of Formation
-201.3 MJ/kmol
-162.62 MJ/kmol
Freezing point
-97.7 C
Boiling point
Critical temperature
512.6 K
Chronic Effect
Page 16
The reaction of methanol is generally breaking of C-0 or O-H bond and substitution of
the displacement of the H or Oh group. The O-H and C-O bond in alcohol are relatively
strong . Because of this bonding strength in alcohol is necessary to achieve acceptable
reaction rate.
4H2O
===>
Methanol
HCHO
H2
Formaldehyde
2H2 + O2 ===>
2H2O
If the oxidizing agent is in excess, the formaldehyde is further oxidized to formic acid
and then to carbon dioxide and water.
[O]
HCHO
Formaldehyde
[O]
Page 17
===>
Methanol
HCHO
H2
Formaldehyde
===>
Methanol
(CH3)2SO4
Dimethyl
H2O
Water
Sulphate
HCOOH ===>
Formic
Acid
HCOOCH3
Methyl
+ H2O
Water
Formate
Page 18
2 Na ===>
Methanol
2CH3ONa
Sodium
+ H2
Sodium
Hydrogen
Meth oxide
Methanol
+ CH3Cl
Phosphorus
Methyl
Phosphoryl
Pent chloride
Chloride
Chloride
POCl3
HCl
===>
CH3Cl
H2O
Methyl
Chloride
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Plastics
ii.
Synthetic fibers
iii.
Paints
iv.
Magnetic film
v.
vi.
Adhesives
vii.
Solvents
viii.
Carpeting
ix.
Insulation
x.
Refrigerants
xi.
xii.
Particle
There are thousands more products that also touch our daily lives in which methanol
is a key component.
Page 22
Chapter 2
Process Selection
Page 23
Methanol is often called wood alcohol because it was once produced chiefly as a
byproduct of the destructive distillation of wood. Most methanols today is produced
from the methane found in natural gas, but methanol is also produced from all types of
biomass, coal, waste, and even CO2 pollution from power plants.
Methanol, unlike oil or gas, does not occur naturally, but, like hydrogen, it is an energy
vector. There are a very large number of routes to make methanol. These range from very
large scale processes based on gas, coal or other fossil resources, to a range of processes
based on renewable biomass feedstocks.
Methanol is manufactured in two major steps; the first step converts the feedstock into
syngas and the next step converts the syngas into methanol. The widest choices in the
route to methanol come in the choice of feedstock and the choice of syngas technology.
Page 24
ii.
iii.
iv.
Hanna
www.indexmundi.com
See Appendix B, Figure 1.1
Page 25
accessibility. The five largest coal users - China, USA, India, Japan and South Africa account for 82% of total global coal use.
CHRISGAS October 2005_WP11_D89 Literature and State-of-the-Art review (Re: Methane Steam
Reforming
9
See Appendix B, Table 1.2
10
See Appendix B, Figure 1.2
Page 26
Nevertheless, expensive catalyst tubing and a large heat recovery section make an SMR
plant a costly investment that can only be justified for very large-scale production.
2.2.1.1
Advantages:
i.
ii.
iii.
2.2.1.2
Disadvantages:
i.
ii.
In partial oxidation reformers, a part of the fuel is combusted inside the reformer to
supply the heat necessary for the endothermic reforming reactions. A refractory-lined
pressure vessel is fed with natural gas and oxygen at a typical pressure of 40 bars. Both
natural gas and oxygen are preheated before entering the vessel and mixed in a burner.
Partial oxidation reaction occurs immediately in a combustion zone below the burner.
To avoid carbon deposition the reactants should be thoroughly mixed and the reaction
temperature should not be lower than 1200C. Sometimes steam is added to the mixture
to suppress carbon formation. In the case of catalytic partial oxidation steam is not
required and the temperature can be below 1000C. The syngas produced leaves the
reactor at temperatures of 13001500C. The syngas from the POX process has a H2/CO
ratio between 1.6 and 1.8, so a shift converter or steam injection is necessary to increase
this ratio for methanol synthesis.
11
Page 27
The non-catalytic process allows the use of a broad range of hydrocarbon fuels from
natural gas to coal and oil residue and remains the only viable technology for heavy
hydrocarbons. The catalytic process has a reduced size and consumes less oxygen, but
runs the risk of catalyst destruction by local thermal stress.
2.2.2.1
Advantages:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
2.2.2.2
i.
Disadvantages:
ii.
iii.
iv.
High temperature heat recovery and soot formation/ handling adds process
complexity
v.
Syngas Methane content is inherently low and not easily low and not
easily modified to meet downstream processing requirements.
12
Page 28
the top of the reactor. The outlet temperature of the catalyst bed is between 850 and
1050C.
The main advantages of ATR are a favorable H2/CO ratio (1.6 to 2.6), reduction of
emissions due to internal heat supply, a high methane conversion, and the possibility to
adjust the syngas composition by changing the temperature of the reaction. However, it
requires an oxygen source. The capital costs for auto thermal reforming are lower than
those of the SMR plant by 25%. Operational costs, however, are the same or even higher
due to the need to produce oxygen. The heat transfer to the catalyst bed is more favorable
in an auto thermal reformer than in the externally heated tubular reformers, since in the
former case the heat in the gas is supplied directly to the catalyst bed. This means that a
high temperature in the catalyst bed can be achieved by burning only a small portion of
the product gas. The quantity of the gas to be burned will be dependent to the inlet
concentration of the methane and other reform able compounds (such as tars) in the
gas. It is more likely that the initial temperature increase in the combustion zone will
reduce the concentration of the tars and other hydrocarbons sharply. However it must be
taken to account that the combustion reaction will consume a part of the hydrogen that is
present in product gas.
2.2.3.1
Advantages:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
2.2.3.2
Disadvantages:
i.
ii.
Page 29
2.2.4.1
Advantages:
i.
ii.
2.2.4.2
Disadvantages:
i.
ii.
iii.
The choice of technology for manufacturing of synthesis gas depends on the scale of
operation. For capacities below 1000-1500 tons/day steam reforming would be cheapest,
whereas auto thermal reforming (ATR) would be cheapest at capacities around
5000 tons/day. For the intermediate range, a combination would be the optimal
solution14.
13
14
Page 30
Chapter 3
Process Description
Page 31
Page 32
Feed Preparations
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Rearrangement of H2 and CO
3.7
Production of Methanol
3.8
Refining of Methanol.
The fine coal particles react with flowing steam and oxygen.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
The high ash content in the sub-bituminous would drive the oxygen consumption
to higher levels.
Page 33
The Syn gas product ratio of H2: CO has a target of 2:1 for direct synthesis to methanol.
However, there are several different gasification operators that produce a variety of
products from Syn gas. The aim for methanol synthesis is to use the operation that will
minimize an extra processing step, namely the downstream water gas shift reactor to
adjust the levels of CO to meet the 2:1 ratio with methanol.
Reaction heat
Reaction
kj/kg.mol
Process
CO2
+393770
Combustion
C+ 2H2
CH4
+74900
Hydrogasification
C+ H2O
CO+H2
-175440
Steam-carbon
C+ Co2
2CO
-172580
Boudouard
Gas-Phase Reaction
H2o + CO
Co + 3H2
H2+ C02
+2853
+250340
Methanation
CH4+ H2
A great deal depends on the gasifier system, coal reactivity and particle size, and method
of contacting coal with gaseous reactants (steam and air or oxygen). It is generally
believed that oxygen reacts completely in a very short distance from the point at which it
is mixed or comes in contact with coal or char. The heat evolved acts to pyrolysis the
coal, and the char formed then reacts with carbon dioxide, steam, or other gases formed
by combustion and pyrolysis.
Page 34
ii.
The solvent rich in sulfur gasses is then further processed by Clause Process to
produce elemental sulfur.
Another consideration is the catalyst. According to the literature, the catalysts are
manufactured by iron oxide with 5-15% Cr2O3. The particle size, time in contact with the
stream and the pressure - all affect the reaction rate. The operating temperature of the
reactor is 400C.
Page 35
HO
2
CO
+ H
2H
+ 3H
CH OH
3
CH OH + H O
3
The first reaction is the primary methanol synthesis reaction, a small amount of CO2 from
the water gas shift reaction in the feed (210%) acts as a promoter of this primary
reaction and helps maintain catalyst activity. The stoichiometry of both reactions is
satisfied when the ratio is
2. Hydrogen builds up in the recycle loop; this leads to an actual R value of the Combined
synthesis feed (make up plus recycle feed) of 3 to 4. The reactions are exothermic and
give a net decrease in molar volume. Therefore, the equilibrium is favored by high
pressure and low temperature.
During production, heat is released and has to be removed to keep optimum catalyst life
and reaction rate. The produced methanol reacts further to form side products such as
dimethyl ether, formaldehyde, or higher alcohols (van Dijk et al. 1995) these by products
will be negligible in the preliminary design reported, but noted for awareness.
Conventionally, methanol is produced in two phase systems, the reactants and products
forming the gas phase and the catalyst forming the solid phase. Before refining of this
methanol solution, it is passed through a flash drum where pressure is reduced up to 500
KPa. Due to this pressure reduction, the syn gasses are separated from methanol-water
solution. These gasses are vented or recycled while methanol solution is sent for refining.
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 36
The AA methanol grade purity specifications require that the weight composition of the
methanol be greater than 99.85% methanol on a dry basis, less than 0.1% water, and less
than 50 ppmw ethanol will .be greater than 99.85% methanol on a dry basis, less than
0.1% water, and less than 50 ppmw ethanol. The distillate does not match these
specifications.
Page 37
Chapter 4
Capacity Selection
Page 38
The methanol industry is one of the worlds most dynamic and vibrant producing a
basic chemical molecule that touches our daily lives in a myriad of ways. From the basic
chemical building block of paints, solvents and plastics, to innovative applications in
energy, transportation fuel and fuel cells, methanol is a key commodity and an integral
part of our global economy.
4.1
The methanol industry spans the entire globe, with production in Asia, North and South
America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Worldwide, over 90 methanol plants have
a combined production capacity of about 75 million metric tons (almost 24 billion gallons
or 90 billion liters), and each day more than 100,000 tons of methanol is used as a
chemical feedstock or as a transportation fuel (33 million gallons or 125 million liters).
Methanol is also a truly global commodity, and each day there is more than 80,000 metric
tons of methanol shipped from one continent to another
.
In 2010, global methanol demand totaled about 45.6 million metric tons and is expected
to exceed 50 million metric tons in 2011, driven in large part by the resurgence of the
global housing market and increased demnd for cleaner energy.
Page 39
But the methanol industry is not just those companies large and small throughout the
globe that produce methanol every day from a wide array of feedstocks including
natural gas, coal, biomass, waste and even CO2 pollution the industry is also made up
of thousands of distributors, technology innovators, downstream manufacturers and
service providers.
4.2
Domestic Production
The production of Methanol totaled at 29291 tons in the June 2012, declined 14% y-o-y
but improved robustly261% sequentially. Indian companies have produced 23191 tonne
of Methanol in May and 27594 tons in April.
i.
ii.
Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers (RCF) is the third largest methanol producer
with installed capacity of 72,600 TPA.
iii.
iv.
v.
More than 60% of Methanol domestic demand is being meeting by imports and
the international market has a direct bearing on domestic prices.
Page 40
vi.
If we add this methanol import in total methanol domestic production then we can
say from calculations that total methanol demand of India in last year is 1182500
TPA.
4.3
China has been the largest methanol consuming country, and will increase its share of
world consumption from almost 41% in 2010 to about 54% in 2015. With total installed
methanol capacity in China does around 38 million tons comprise 60% of the global
capacity with a production of 15.88 million tons indicating capacity utilization of 65%. In
spite of such a low capacity China is further adding around 15 million capacity of
methanol in the coming years on prospect of less reliable on crude oil. Increased demand
in the Chinese market has been fueled by methanol gasoline blending and dimethyl ether
(DME), which combined account for 33% of the Chinese methanol demand and are
expected to grow by 30% this year alone.
Page 41
Total Demand of methanol in China is around 21 million tons comprising 5 million tonne
of imports mainly from import from Middle East Countries. Middle East countries
produces methanol at a much cheaper cost due to lower natural gas prices while in China,
methanol is mainly produced from coal, which accounts for about 60% to 70% of the
total production cost of methanol.
Coal is the major raw material for the production of methanol in China constituting
around 57% followed by natural gas of around 28% and coke oven gas of around 15%.
Middle East Countries too are adding around 11 million tons of methanol capacity.
China to overcome excess methanol capacity is developing and exploiting new
application potentials for methanol. Millions of metric tons of methanol will be mainly
used for direct blending into gasoline and for conversion into DME - again for use as a
fuel. China is promoting methanol to olefin technology.
Methanol is used to produce acetic acid, formaldehyde, and a number of other chemical
intermediaries that are utilized to make countless products throughout the global
economy and by volume, methanol is one of the top 5 chemical commodities shipped
around the world each year. The global methanol industry generates $36 billion in
economic activity each year, while creating over 100,000 jobs around the globe.
Keeping in view the trends of the methanol industry and the global demand, the capacity
selected for our process is 250 Metric tons per day (MTPD).
Page 42
Chapter # 5
For the material and energy balance of the entire plant, the following conditions used:
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 43
Basis=1 hour
Reference Temperature= 25 oC
5.1
279.05
48.71
580.08
872.94
818.34
818.34
872.94
28.28
846.62
846.62
578.08
268.54
328.08
250
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
Mt/day
m 11
m 13
In Stream
m 11= 578.08 MT/Day
No
Component
% Age
Flow rate
CH3OH
43.225
249.87508
H2O
56.78
328.23382
Out Stream
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 44
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CH3OH
99.95
249.875
H2O
0.05
0.125
m13=328.08 MT/Day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
H2O
100
328.28
(1)
Overall Balance
m11
m13 + m14
(2)
578.08 MT/Day
5.2
328.08 MT/Day
m 12
m 10
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 45
m 11
In Stream
m10 = 846.62 MT/Day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CH3OH
29.5
249.7529
H2O
38.77
328.2345
CO
1.86
15.7471
CH4
0.59
4.995
N2
0.54
4.5717
H2
1.7
14.392
CO2
27.03
228.841
Ethanol
0.00573
0.04851
Solvent
0.0047
0.03979
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
5.86
15.7364
H2
5.36
14.39
CH4
1.86
4.99
N2
1.7
4.565
CO2
85.19
228.76
Solvent
0.0148
0.03974
Ethanol
0.018
0.04833
Out Stream
m12=268.54 MT/Day
m11=578.08 MT/Day
Page 46
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CH3OH
43.225
249.875
H2O
56.78
328.233
m11 =
578.08 MT/Day
(3)
Overall Balance
m10 = m11 + m12
(4)
846.62 MT/Day
m12 =
268.54 MT/Day
Page 47
5.3
m9
m 10
CO +
CO2
2H2
+ 3H2
CH3OH
CH3OH + H2O
In Stream
m9= 846.62 MT/Day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
24.54
207.760
H2
49.07
415.436
CH4
0.47
3.979
N2
0.43
3.640
CO2
22.15
187.526
H2O
3.34
28.277
Solvent
0.0037
0.03132
m10 =
846.62 MT/Day
Overall Balance
m9 =
m10
m9 =
846.62 MT/Day
(5)
Page 48
5.4
m6
CO
H2O
CO2 + H2
In Stream
m8=28.28 MT/Day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
Stream
100
28.28
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
55.82
456.797
H2
38.83
317.761
CH4
0.61
4.991
N2
0.54
4.419
CO2
4.2
34.370
Absorber
0.3928
0.3928
m6= 843.28MT/Day
Page 49
Out Stream
m9=846..62MT/day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
24.54
207.760
H2O
3.34
28.277
N2
0.43
3.640
H2
49.07
415.436
CO2
22.15
187.526
CH4
0.47
3.979
Solvent
0.0037
0.0313
m9 =
846.62 MT/Day
(6)
m9 =
m6 + m8
(7)
Overall Balance
Water Balance
m9 (0.0334) = m6 (0) + m8 (1.0)
From Eq (6)
m8 =
28.28 MT/Day
m6 =
818.34 MT/Day
Page 50
5.5
m5
m7
m4
m6
In Stream
m5= 818.34MT/day
no
Component
% age
Flow rate
Absorber Solvent
100
818.34
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
52.17
455.412
H2O
5.58
48.710
N2
0.54
4.713
H2
36.27
316.615
CO2
3.92
34.21
CH4
1.12
9.776
NH3
0.049
0.4277
m4=872.94 MT/day
Page 51
Out Stream
m7=872.94 MT/day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
N2
0.027
0.235
H2O
5.36
46.789
CH4
0.53
4.626
H2 S
0.39
3.40
Solvent
93.7
817.944
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
55.82
456.797
H2
38.83
317.76
CH4
0.61
4.99
N2
0.54
4.419
CO2
4.2
34.37
Absorber
0.048
0.392
m6= 818.73MT/day
m6 =
818..28 MT/day
(8)
Overall Balance
m4 + m5 = m6 + m7
(9)
Solvent Balance
m4 (0) + m5 (1.0) = m6 (0) + m7 (1.0)
m4 =
817.947 + m7 (0.063)
(10)
H S Balance
2
= m7
Page 52
5.6
m1
m4
m2
m3
In Stream
m1=279.05MT/day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
66.84
186.517
4.89
13.645
1.49
4.15
1.22
3.40
13.04
36.38
Ash
12.51
34.90
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
Steam
48.71
48.71
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
O2
100
580.08
m2=48.71MT/Day
Page 53
Out Stream
m4=872.94 MT/Day
No
Component
% Age
Flow Rate
CO
52.17
455.412
H2
36.27
316.615
CO2
3.92
34.219
H2O
5.58
48.71
N2
0.54
4.713
H2S
0.39
3.404
CH4
1.12
9.776
NH3
0.049
0.427
m4 = 872.94 MT/Day
(11)
Overall Balance
m1 + m2 + m3 =
m4 + A
(12)
Steam Balance
m1 (0) + m2 (1) + m3 (0) = m4 (0.0558) + A (0)
From (11)
m2 = 48.71 MT/Day
Ash Balance
m1 (0.1251) + m2 (0) + m3 (0) = m4 (0) + A (1)
A
= (0.1251) m1
(13)
= (0.1251)(279.05)
= 34.9 MT/Day
put in (12)
Page 54
Energy Balance:
5.7
Steam 230 C
3200KPa
O2 25 C
3200KPa
K.E + P.E + H
Component
hf
hf
Flow
KJ/Mol
KJ/Mol
Rate
O2
36.38
H2
13.64
H2O
-241.8
48.71
N2
4.15
186.517
H2S
-20.7
3.40
CO2
-293.59
34.21
CH4
-74.6
9.77
CO
-110.25
455.412
Page 55
Enthalpy of Formation:
H = ( Hf) (products) - ( Hf) (reactants)
Hf K J/mol
Reaction
C+O2
CO2
-393.59
C+0.5 O2
CO
-110.525
C+ H2O
CO+ H2
131.275
C+ Co2
2CO
283.065
H2o + CO
H2+ C02
-41.256
Co + 3H2
CH4+ H2 O
205.875
C+ 2H2
CH4
-74.6
H2 + S
H2 S
-20.6
N2 +3H2
2NH3
-45.90
Heat Output
Hproduct
= mCp T
Heat Input
From Steam Table
Hin = 420.345 KJ/s
Heat Required = Hin - Hout + Hf
420.345 5.6.6 * 1023 + 227.84
Heat Required = -5.61E23
KJ/s
Page 56
5.8
K.E + P.E + H
= H(product) -
H(reactant)
Q = H = m Cp T
Heat in = 5.6.6 * 10
KJ/s
Heat in by Water
As water is in at reference temperature, so heat in by water is 0
m Cp T
KJ/s
Page 57
KJ/gmol
From ASPEN
Flow rate of outlet water n = 300.269 Kmol/hr
Q = H = 67327.38 * 300.269
Q
= 5615.64 KJ/s
So total
Qout
Qout
So proved,
Qin
= Qout
Page 58
5.9
Steam 400 C
3100KPa
Syn Gas
400 C
2400 KPa
Reaction:
CO + H2 O
CO2+ H2
K.E + P.E + H
Component
Hf KJ/mol.K
Flow Rate
H2 O
-241.8
28.27
CO
-110.525
207.76
H2
415.43
CO2
-393.509
187.52
Enthalpy of Formation
Hf = { (-393.509) + (0) }
Hf
- { (-110.525) + (-241.8) }
= - 41.184 KJ/mol
Page 59
Heat input
H reactant = m Cp T
There are two reactants
H steam = 3231 KJ/Kg
Mass flow rate = m = 2.28 MT/day
m
m H steam
= 0.3273
Kg/s
= 3231 * 0.327
Heat Output
H out = m Cp T
Cp = 2.4737E16 J/kmol. C
m = 504.019 Kmol/hr.
Q = 504.019 * 2.4737E16 * (400 25) (1000)
Q = 129.87E16 KJ/s
Q = 129.87E16 KJ/s
Page 60
QW
K.E + P.E + H
Input =
Put Out
H in = Q = mCp T
Cp = 7.2174E20 J/gmol. K
Q = 1084.96 * 1.5458E20 * (283 298)
Q = 416.185E20 KJ/s
H out of methanol =
mCp T
Cp = 7.8911E20 J/gmol. K
Q = 325.52 * 7.8911E20 * (383 273)
Q = 78.49E20
Page 61
CO + H2
CH3 OH
CO2 + H2
CH3 OH + H2 O
QW
K.E + P.E + H
= H(product) -
H(reactant) + H(formation)
Components
Hf KJ/mol.K
Flow Rate
CO2
-393.5
228.84
CO
-110.525
15.74
H2
14.39
CH3OH
-238.6
249.75
H2 O
-285.84
328.23
Page 62
Enthalpy of formation
Reaction: 1
CO + H2
CH3 OH
Hf = { (- 238.84) }
Hf
- { (-110.5) + (-393.5) }
- 265.16 KJ/mol
Reaction: 2
CO2 + H2
CH3 OH + H2 O
Hf = { (- 238.84) }
Hf
+ { (-258.84) - (-393.5) + ( 0 ) }
=
- 103.94 KJ/mol
Total Hf
= - 161.22 KJ/mol
Total Hf
= - 22571.65 KJ/s
Heat input
H in = m Cp T
Cp = 3.1829E20 J/gmol. C
Q = 504.019* 3.1829E20 * (400 25)
H in = 167.06E16 KJ/s
Heat Output
H out = m Cp T
Cp = 1.268E21 J/gmol. C
Q = 1588.97* 1.268E21 * (400 25)
H in = 209.88E21 K
Page 63
Chapter 6
Designing of
Gasifier
Page 64
Purpose
Gasification with a usable heating value of gaseous products is a process to convert
carbonaceous fuels. Carbonaceous fuel solids, liquids and such coals, biomass, residual
gases as oil and natural gas are included. Entrained flow, fluidized bed and moving bed
(sometimes, somewhat erroneously, called fixed bed) - similar to traditional solid fuel
boilers, gasifies can be divided into three basic categories. Fluidized bed gasifier
fluidized bed combustors are just as; entrained flow gasifier PF-firing is similar in
concept and moving bed gasifier fire to penetrate bear some similarities. Different types
of gasification processes are compared in the following sections. However, these
categories are different types of gasifier equipment that should be noted the air / oxygen
flow directions are based classification.
6.1
Types of Gasifier:
i.
ii.
iii.
Page 65
Page 66
Entrained Flow
Fuel Types
Solid Liquid
Solid
Solid
Fuel Size
<500m
0.5-5mm
5-50mm
1-10s
5-50s
15-30min
Gas outlet
900-1400
700-900
400-500
temperature
Gasifier technical issues that affect the selection of material to be gasified and project
scale features are added.
Coal: Gasifier all three major categories (ie, entrained flow, fluidized bed and moving
bed) coal gasification can be used to do. Gasifier selection may affect the properties of
the coal and coal ash content and reactivity include melting point. Viscosity high ash coal
and limestone are reduced using. Fluidized bed gasifier ash melting does not depend on
the high ash content coal is used for fluidized bed gasifier and entrained bed gasifier for
such a low ash content coal is used.
Plant size: Entrained bed gasifier plant size can be up to 300 MW. Move the bed and
fluidized bed gasifier plants compared with multiple gasifiers require a higher capacity
for the plant is small and therefore. Some of scale economies we can afford to lose.
Oxidant: oxidant for the use of 'air' option and 'oxygen' is. Oxygen and entrained bed
gasifier operates mostly in the fluidized bed gasifier is used both oxidants can be used.
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 67
The use of air in a plant that is a very expensive commodity ASU (Air Separation Unit)
helps to get rid of but is in a flipside, the nitrogen flow processing equipment as large.
Percentage
CO
52.5
H2
36.0
CO2
10.0
H2S + COS
0.4
N2 + Ar
1.1
Note: Average heating value = 286 Btu/scf: All percentage are in volume percent
15
From Lloyd,W.G, The Emerging Synthetic Fuel Industry, Thumann, A,, Ed, Atlanta, GA: Fairmont
Press,1981.pp. 19-58
Page 68
6.2
Design:
Reactions:
C+O2
CO2
C+0.5 O2
CO
C+ H2O
CO+ H2
C+ Co2
2CO
H2o + CO
H2+ C02
Co + 3H2
CH4+ H2 O
C+ 2H2
CH4
H2 + S
H2 S
N2 +3H2
T = temperature of gasifier
2NH3
= 1500 C
= 1500 + 273
= 1773 K
P = pressure of gasifier
3200 KPa
= 31.58atm
= 464.12 Psi
Page 69
Main Reaction:
There are three main reactions
C+O2
CO2
C+0.5 O2
CO
C+ H2O
CO+ H2
Among this reaction (3) is slowest step according to thermodynamic study of these
reactions
i.
Order of Reaction:
According to thermodynamic and kinetic studies of gasification process its order
is 2nd.
Considering plug flow reactor behavior of gasification.
We get,
Performance eq. of PFR:
-rA
= k CA2
CA0
= Initial Concentration
CA
= Final Concentration
-rA
= Fractional Conversion Of A
= Rate of Reaction
Page 70
ii.
Moles of carbon:
= 647.628
Kmol/hr
To convert it into VFR, we divided it with density of carbon (graphite)
= 2000
Kg/m3
So,
Volumetric flow of carbon = 3.886 m3/hr.
Initial concentration of C = Cc0 = 647.628 / 3.886
= 166.666 Kmol/m3
Now final concentration
= ??
Final concentration
Where
Ec = fractional change in volume
Ec = (Vf - V 0)/ V 0) = 2-2/2 = 0
As there is no change in volume
So,
Cc = Cc0 (1-XA)
Put values
Cc = (166.66 Kmol/m3) (1-0.99)
Cc = 1.667 Kmol/m3
Now rate eq. for reaction
C+H2O
-rc
=
=
CO+ H2
k Cc2
kc [Cc ] [CH2O ]
Where
[Cc]
= rate constant
so,
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 71
-rA
kc [C] [H2O]
iii.
1.78Kmol/m3.s
Residence time
= [Co
= 166.67 (0.99/1.78)
= 92.7 sec
iv.
Volume of solid
Page 72
V = volume of gasifier
t = residence time
[Co] = initial concentration of Carbon
[Co]
= 166.67 K mol/m3
Fc
= 647.628 Kmol/hr
= 0.18 Kmol/s
So,
V = t* Fc / [Co]
V = 93 * 0.18/166.67
V = 0.1 m3
This is volume of solid
v.
Vg = nRT/P
n = flow rate of product gas out of gasifier
From Mass balance data
n = 4.693 Kmol/s
P = 3200 KPa
R = 8.314 KPa m3/Kmol.K
T = 1772.0 K
Put values,
Vg = nRT/P
= 4.693 * 8.314 *1772/3200
= 21.6 m3
Page 73
vi.
Volume of Gasifier
= 0.1 + 21.6
Volume = V = 21.7 m3
vii.
Diameter of Gasifier:
Volume = 21.7 m3
Area * length = 21.7 m3
D2 /4 * L
= 21.7 m3
(1)
36
put in (1)
D2 /4 * 5D
= 21.7
5 /4 * D3
= 21.7
3.925 D3
= 21.7
D = 1.77m
L = 1.77 * 5
L = 8.85m
viii.
Thickness =
Where,
P = Pressure on which gasifier is operating = 464.12Psi
Inside radius =
= 0.0885m
Thickness = 0.1725 m
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 74
6.3
Specification Sheet
Type of gasifier
Entrained flow
Reactor behavior
Residence time:
92 sec
Length:
8.85m
Thickness:
0.1725m
Volume of solid
o.1 m3
21.6 m3
Volume of gasifier
21.7 m3
Dia of gasifier
1.77 m
Thickness
0.175 m
Page 75
Chapter 7
Designing of
Methanol Reactor
Page 76
7.1
Purpose:
Methanol reactor is used in the process for the production of methanol from the inlet feed
CO2 ,H2 , CO from water gas shift reactor by hydrogenation of CO2 & Hydrogenation of
CO . Methanol is recovered.
7.2
7.3
i.
Conversion
ii.
Selectivity
iii.
Productivity
iv.
Safety
v.
Economics
vi.
Flexibility
vii.
viii.
Energy utilization
ix.
Feasibility
x.
Reactor types:
ii.
iii.
PFR
Page 77
PFR
Required
maintenance
Efficiencies
Efficiencies
7.4
Designing
Overview the following aspect & parameter we selected the PFR for the methanol
synthesis
Design Steps
Once the material balance is over the reactor is performed. The next step is to determine
the following parameter.
i.
Rate of reaction
ii.
Residence time
iii.
Volume of reactor
iv.
Space velocity
v.
Space time
vi.
Diameter
Page 78
Operating conditions
T = temperature of Methanol reactor = 200C
= 200 + 273.15
= 473.15 K
P = pressure of Methanol reactor
= 2328 KPa
Main Reaction:
Synthesis of methanol takes place via two main reactions.
Hydrogenation of CO
C0 + 2H 2
CH3OH
Hydrogenation of CO 2
C0 2 + 3H 2
CH3OH +H2O
Order of Reaction:According to thermodynamic and kinetic studies of methanol synthesis process its order
is 2nd considering plug flow reactor. We get
Calculations:-
i.
Step 1:
CA0
= Initial Concentration
CA
= Final Concentration
XA
= Fractional Conversion Of A
-ra
= Rate of Reaction
Page 79
= 8586.10 Kmol/hr
To convert it into volumetric flow rate, we divided it with density of hydrogen at32 Bar,
473.15k
= 1.64 Kg/m3
= 10554.6 m3/hr.
=??
ii.
Step 2:-
C02+ 3H2O
CH3OH+ H2
Page 80
Where
[K1]
= Reaction Rate
[KEq ]
[KCO]
[KCO2]
[K H2 ]
[C Co2]
[C H2]
= 0.8134 kmol/m3
= 0.533 sec -1
[KH2]
= 0.0031 sec -1
= 1.011 sec -1
Page 81
- rCH3OH
iii.
= 0.02042 mol/m3.sec
Step 3:
= 0.8134(0.97/0.0204)
= 38.6 sec
Residence Time = 38.6 Sec
iv.
Step 4:
= 0.8134 K mol/m3
Fh
= 8586.10 Kmol/hr.
= 2.38 Kmol/s
v = * Fh / [Co]
v = 38.6 * 2.38 /0.8134
v = 112 m3
Page 82
v.
Step 5:
Space Velocity:
Space Velocity =
vi.
= 0.0259 s -1
step 6:
(1)
put in (1)
D2 /4 * 4D
= 112m3
4 /4 * D3
= 112m3
3.14 D3
112m3
D = 3.292m
L = 3.292 * 4
L = 13.16m
vii.
Step 7:
Where,
P = Pressure on which methanol reactor is operating = 3200kpa
P = 32 bar=32 * 1.415 * 10-3 psi
P = 0.04528 psi = 0.3121 kPa
Page 83
Inside radius =
= 0.85
7.5
Specification Sheet
Reactor behavior
Volume:
112m3
Length:
13.16 m
Thickness:
0.00318262 m
Residence time:
38.6 sec
Diameter:
3.292 m
Space velocity
0.0259 s-1
Pressure drop
.3121 kPa
Inside radius
1.646 m
Page 84
Chapter # 08
Designing of Heat
Exchanger
Page 85
Purpose
Heat exchanger is a device which is used to transfer heat between two streams, having
different temperatures, through a boundary wall. The plan of the heat exchanger reactor
outlet heat exchanger between process streams in the Utility is used for. Follow the river
methanol mixture and utility boiler feed water stream. Our goal reactor outlet temperature
of the process stream is to reduce the methanol mixture. Its purity can be increased so
that the temperature is lower for the separation of methanol from other components.
8.1
Following are the basic types of heat exchangers being used in chemical industry;
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
8.2
Selection Criteria
i.
ii.
Efficiency is one that operates most efficiently, with the minimum loss of energy
in the transfer, and minimum drop in pressure of the fluids.
iii.
iv.
Materials must be built from materials that are compatible with the process
streams and are not expensive
v.
vi.
Ease of construction
Page 86
8.3
The shell and tube heat exchanger was selected due to following reasons:
In process industries , shell and tube exchangers are used in great numbers, for more than
any other type of exchanger
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Its codes and standards for design and fabrication are easily available
v.
Due to their design, shell and tube heat exchangers offer a large heat transfer area
and provide high heat transfer efficiency
vi.
vii.
8.4
There are three principal types of shell and tube heat exchangers, including;
i.
ii.
U-tube exchangers
iii.
8.5
Designing
Methanol = q = m Cp
Water
= q=m Cp
Q = UAT
Cp = 33.53
= 33.53 * 1000 * 18.5296/1000
= 612.30
C = 33.54
p
T = 400K
Page 87
Q = m Cp
= 519.9*33.53*400/3600
Q = 1936.9 KJ/s
That is heat load now to find the mass flow rate of water
Q = mwCp
1936. = mw 4.18* (887-297)
mw = 0.7854kg/s
So this is the rate flow of water.
LMTD =
=
LMTD
I.
976.86K
II.
Ud = 80 W/m C
A = 24.78 m
Now from
Kern heat transfer table #10
Tube outside dia (do) = 1 in
Tube inside dia (di ) = o.870 in
Page 88
III.
No Of Tubes:
= 3.655ft2
= 24.78/o.306
= 80.98 = 81 tubes
IV.
Tube pitch:
Pt. = 1.25d * square pitch
= 1.25* 0.0254
Pt. = 0.3175m
= 3.14 * 0.022/4
= 0.00380 m
= 40*0.0038=0.0152 m2
V.
= D
=
=
1.25 D
D (Nt/k1)1/n
= 0.0254(81/0.156)1/2.2
Page 89
= 0.389 m
At = 0.00380 m
G = 10.10134/0.00380
= 2658.8 kg/m2.C
Re =
As water is in tube side so we take viscosity of water at 320 Bar
=
0.000017kg/m.s
Re =
2658.8 * 0.002/0.000017
Re =
Prenatal Number:
Pr =
As steam produce is so for super-heated steam
C = 1.59 Btu/lb.F
K = 0.0282 Btu/hr.ft.F
K = 0.0145 KJ/Kg.K
Or
K = 0.000000388 KJ/s.m.K
By putting values,
Page 90
Pr = 0.0145 *
Pr = 0.6353
From fig # 25 of process heat transfer by Kern
As tube side velocity =
= 0.984 m/s
Heat transfer coefficient:
hi = JH RePr1/3 (k/d)
1/3
* 0.000000368/0.0254
hi = 2615.727
VI.
inner dia*c*b/144pt
= 0.490(o.3175-0.0254) *10.88/144*0.3175
Area = 0.0341m2
Page 91
VII.
G = 10.10/0.0341 = 296kg/m2
Reynolds no:
Re = ds*G/u
u
= o.33cp
Re = o.490*296/0.033
= 4395.15
Pr
= C *u/K
= 0.033 cp *0.0064/o.ooooo156
Pr = 134.64
Jh = 170
From fig28 kern
1/3
Ho = Jh*Re*Pr
*k/de
= 170*4395.15*134.8651/3*(0.000001566/0.0246)
Ho =
VIII.
239.96 kj/s. m .k
Page 92
IX.
Jf = 3.3*10
-3
X.
Viscosity neglected so
Ps = 8jf(Ds/de)(L/lB)uS2
So shell dia is
Ds = 0.490m
L = 5m
De= 0.0242m
lb = 0.107m
= 947.48 kg/m3
u = 0.023
Re = 4395.15
Jf = 3.9*10-2
Now putting values in Eq
Ps= 8*3.9*102(0.490/0.0242)(5/0.107)947.48/2(0.023)2
= 0.312*23.189*46.72*0.37
= 125.54 kg*N*sec2/m.sec2*kg.m
N/m2 = Pa = Ps = 73 KPa
Page 93
8.6
Specification Sheet
No of tubes
81 tubes
0.490 m
0.0341m2
2.4 KPa
24.78 m2
0.0152 m2
Area
27.53m2
73 KPa
LMTD
976.86 k
Tube pith
0.317 m
Bundle dia
0.389 m
Re
Pr
0.6353
73 kPa
Page 94
Chapter # 09
Designing of
Distillation Column
Page 95
9.1 Purpose:
Ddistillation column is to produces grade AA at the top of the distillation column has a
purity of 99.95% by weight. The feed to the column is methanol has a fraction of
0.43225.
9.2
Vapour liquid mass transfer plate column or a packed column operation can be taken.
These are two very different types of operation. Selection depends on the following
factors column.
i.
Aspects of the system depends on the scaling, foaming, fouling factors, corrosive
systems, thermal evolution, pressure drop, liquid holdup.
ii.
iii.
Maintenance, weight, the river, the physical column size and price Depends On
the properties of the element and its internals.
Without flooding the plate columns wide range of liquid flow rates are designed
to handle. If a system is composed of solid material concrete voids, coating and
packaging materials shall be stored in non-efficient because will be handled in a
plate column
ii.
iii.
Periodic cleaning is needed, the holes shall be provided for cleaning. Packed in
columns packing must be removed before cleaning.
iv.
v.
Packed column design information is more readily available and more reliable
than this.
Diameter> 0.67m Is
Page 96
Bubble cap,
ii.
sieve trays,
iii.
They are less expensive and lighter in weight. It's easy and cheap to install.
ii.
iii.
iv.
As well as the basic principles are established and entailing less risk.
9.4 Construction
Many factors have to be considered when selecting engineering materials, but for
chemical process plant the overriding consideration is usually the ability to resist
corrosion. The process designer will be responsible for recommending materials that will
be suitable for the process conditions. He must also consider the requirements of the
mechanical design engineer; the material selected must have sufficient strength and be
easily worked. The most economical material that satisfies both process and mechanical
requirements should be selected; this will be the material that gives the lowest cost over
the working life of the plant, allowing for maintenance and replacement. Other factors,
such as product contamination and process safety, must also be considered.
The unit handling water & methanol can face the following challenges due to the effect
of thermodynamic properties of the mixture;
9.4.1
The tensile strength and elastic modulus of metals decrease with increasing temperature.
For example, the tensile strength of mild steel (low carbon steel, C < 0.25 per cent) is 450
N/mm2 at 25C falling to 210 at 500C, and the value of Young's modulus 200,000
N/mm2 at 25C falling to 150,000 N/mm2 at 500C. If equipment is being designed to
Page 97
operate at high temperatures, materials that retain their strength must be selected. The
stainless steels are superior in this respect to plain carbon steels.
Creep resistance will be important if the material is subjected to high stresses at elevated
temperatures. Special alloys, such as Inconel (International Nickel Co.), are used for high
temperature equipment such as furnace tubes. At low temperatures, less than 10C,
metals that are normally ductile can fail in a brittle manner. Serious disasters have
occurred through the failure of welded carbon steel vessels at low temperatures. The
phenomenon of brittle failure is associated with the crystalline structure of metals. Metals
with a body-centered-cubic (bcc) lattice are more liable to brittle failure than those with a
face-centered-cubic (fee) or hexagonal lattice. The brittle fracture of welded structures is
a complex phenomenon and is dependent on plate thickness and the residual stresses
present after fabrication; as well as the operating temperature.
9.4.2
Pitting
Pitting is the term given too much localized corrosion that forms pits in the metal surface.
If a material is liable to pitting penetration can occur prematurely and corrosion rate data
are not a reliable guide to the equipment life.
9.4.3
Effect of stress
Corrosion rate and the form of attack can be changed if the material is under stress.
Generally, the rate of attack will not change significantly within normal design stress
values. However, for some combinations of metal, corrosive media and temperature, the
phenomenon called stress cracking can occur. This is the general name given to a form of
attack in which cracks are produced that grow rapidly, and can cause premature, brittle
failure, of the metal.
9.4.4
High-temperature oxidation
Corrosion is normally associated with aqueous solutions but oxidation can occur in dry
conditions. Carbon and low alloy steels will oxidize rapidly at high temperatures and
their use is limited to temperatures below 50QC, Chromium is the most effective
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 98
Owing the above information the material of construction for the manufacture of
distillation column can be decided. The best material available with optimum
considerations should be selected.
A material chosen should possess the following properties;
i.
ii.
Should have sufficient strength not to rupture with excessive pressure inside the
vessel
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
Since, this column can has a maximum pressure of 490 KPa & a temperature as high as
1380C. Moreover water vapors present inside can cause pitting or cavitations to the
plates.
Conventionally most of the distillation columns are made up of stainless steel. The reason
being its stability against the influence of vapors & the weather conditions which
consequently would cause rusting or corrosion if any weaker material has been used.
Keeping in view the properties of the material & the requirement, the following material
is selected16.
Stainless steel (18Cr, 8Ni)
Keeping in mind the above information, a plate column has been selected for the purpose.
16
From: Table 7.2. Mechanical properties of common metals and alloys of Chemical
Engineering by Coulson & Richardson Vol.6th Ed. 3rd
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 99
9.5
Designing
Top Product
Bottom Product
(kg/hr)
(kg/hr)
(kmol/hr)
water
13677.50
5.21
12864.5
methanol
10411.0936
10412.29
806.6
Total
24088.5936
10417.5
13671.0936
Component
Top Product
Bottom Product
Mole Fractions
Mole Fractions
Mole Fractions
Methanol
0.43225
0.995
0.059
Water
0.5678
0.0005
0.941
Component
= 0.43225
Xd
= 0.995
Xw
Xf
Ki
Ki*Xf
Methanol
0.43225
2.01
0.8688
Water
0.56775
0.99
0.562
Ki*Xf =1.42
Page 100
Component
yi
Ki
yi / ki
Methanol
0.995
1.09
1.084
Water
0.0005
0.4478
0.00028
yi/ki =1.08
Component
Xw
Ki
Ki*Xw
Methanol
0.059
5.301
0.3127
Water
0.941
0.7737
0.728
Ki*Xw=1.040
Page 101
Where,
K1 for methanol = 2.01 & K2 for water = 0.99
= K1/K2
= 2.01/0.99
= 2.03
Rmin;by using Underwood method:
Using Underwood equation;
Rm =
=
=
[2.31231 -
[2.31231 -
= 0.9708 [2.31231 -
]
]
Rm = 2.2
n
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 102
=
=
=
= 6.4
n=7
So minimum number of plates is 7
Gilliland related the number of equilibrium stages and the minimum reflux ratio and the
no. of equilibrium stages with a plot that was transformed by Eduljee into the relation;
]0.566 ]
= 0.75 [1 (R -
]0.566]
Location of Feed:
The Kirk bride method is used to determine the ratio of trays above and below the feed
point.
= 0.206 log [( )(
)F {
= 0.206 log [(
}2]
)(
)F {
}2]
Page 103
] = 0.89786
ND =7.9 NB
So feed will be entered at the plate number 8
= = 130
= 2.03
Because liquid and vapor flow rates are greater at bottom so based upon bottom flow
rates. The following parameters are required to be calculated before getting the column
diameter;
Page 104
V
m
V 3600
V
Vm = maximum vapor flow rate in Stripping section
Q
v = Density
of vapor
QV =
= 1.768 m3/s
QL
Lm
L 3600
=
= 0.015 m3/s
c) Tray dynamics
Flow Parameter
L
FLV m v
Vm L
=(
0.5
0.5
= 0.2543
Assumed tray spacing = 18 = 0.457 m
From Fig 15-5 (b) of Plant Design & Economics for Chemical Engineers, sieve tray
Flooding capacity,
Csb = 0.08 m/s
Surface tension of system = =21.73 dynes/cm
Page 105
= 0.80 * 2.3865
VN = 1.909 m/s
Volumetric flow rate of vapor= m/
= 36.11/11.21
= 3.221 m3/s
f) Net-Area:
An
An
= 1.687 m2
Diameter of Column
Since we have;
Ac =
D=
D2
4 Ac
Page 106
D=
D =1.589 m
D= 1.60 m
QV
An
=
= 1.048 m/s
* 100
= 62.1%
This is safe enough.
10 Calculation of Entrainment
As FLV = 0.254 and F = 60.1%
From Figure 11.29 of Coulson 6, we calculate
= 0.045
= Fractional Entrainment factor
Since, < 0.1, so now the process is satisfactory
Net area= An = 1.687 m2
Active area = Aa = Ac - 2Ad = 1.389 m2
Down comer area = Ad = 0.15 Ac = 0.298 m2
Hole area = Ah = 0.1 Aa = 0.138 m2
Take weir height; hw= 25 mm = 0.025 m
Hole diameter; dh= 5 mm = 0.005 m
Plate thickness= xw= 5 mm = 0.005 m
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 107
= 1.0 m
= 10. 59 m
Length / Dia ratio (L/D) ratio:
L/D =
= 6.67
Page 108
9.6
Specification Sheet
Packing type
Tray Column
Reflux ratio
2.64
Number or trays
18
Tray spacing
0.457 m
Height of column
10.59m
Diameter of column
1.589m
Flooding
62.1 %
Tray type
Sieve tray
Hole area
0.1389 m2
Pressure drop
16.01 kPa
Hole size
0.005 m
0.298 m2
0.138 m2
Page 109
Chapter 10
Coast Estimation
Page 110
Page 111
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
It is a once-only cost that is not recovered at the end of the project life, other than the
scrap value.
The fixed capital investment classified in to two sub divisions:
i.
Direct Cost
ii.
Indirect Cost
Page 112
ii.
iii.
Insulation cost
iv.
v.
Piping
vi.
Electrical installation
vii.
viii.
Yard improvement
ix.
Service facilities
x.
Land
Construction expenses
ii.
Contractors fee
iii.
Contingencies
Start-up expenses
Start-up.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Page 113
Most of the working capital is recovered at the end of the project. The total investment
needed for a project is the sum of the fixed and working capital.
Variable cost
10.7.1
Fixed Cost
i.
ii.
Operating labor
iii.
Laboratory costs
iv.
Supervision
v.
Plant overheads
vi.
Capital changes
vii.
viii.
Insurance
ix.
Raw materials
ii.
iii.
Utilities
iv.
Page 114
Present Cost /Index at Present Time=Original Cost /Index Value at Time of Original
Cost.
Page 115
Chapter 11
Instrumentation and
Process Control
11.1 Objective
Primary objective of the designer when specifying instrumentation and control schemes
are:
i.
ii.
iii.
Shutdown systems.
iv.
To operate at the lowest production cost, commensurate with the other objective. These
are not separate objectives and must be considered together. Measurement is a
Page 116
fundamental requisite of process control either the control will be affected automatically,
semi-automatically or manually.
The quality of the control obtainable is a function of the accuracy, repeatable and
reliability of the measuring devices employed. The objective of an automatic process
control is to use the manipulated variable to maintain the controlled variable at its set
point in spite of disturbances. Instruments are provided to monitor the key process
variables during plant operations. Instruments monitoring critical process variables will
be fitted with automatic alarms to alert, the operations to critical and hazardous
situations.
Pneumatic instruments are used in this plant. The main process parameters are all
indicated in the control room where automatic or remote control is carried out centrally.
The process parameters e.g. temperatures, pressure flow, liquid level etc. are converted to
signals with transducers and then indicated, recorded and controlled with secondary
instruments.
Outlet temperature of the system is measured, with the help of thermocouple. This
temperature is fed to a comparator. The difference between the set point and the input
signal is called error, is fed to the controller, which controls diaphragm valve to adjust the
flow of hot or cooling medium.
Page 117
Page 118
For example if a certain quantity is entering in a process, then a monitor will be there at
the process to note its value. Any changes from the set point will be sent to the final
control element through the controller so that to adjust the incoming quantity according
to desired value (set point). But in fact changes have already occurred and only corrective
action can be taken while using feedback control system.
11.5.2 Feed Forward Control Loop:
A method of control in which the value of disturbance is measured than action is taken to
prevent the disturbance by changing the value of a process variable. This is a control
method designed to prevent errors from occurring in a process variable. This control
system is better than feedback control because it anticipates the change in the process
variable before it enters the process and takes the preventive action. While in feedback
control system action is taken after the change has occurred.
11.5.3 Ratio control:
A control loop in which, the controlling element maintains a predetermined ratio of one
variable to another. Usually this control loop is attached to such as system where two
different systems enter a vessel for reaction that may be of any kind. To maintain the
stoichiometric quantities of different streams, this loop is used so that to ensure proper
process going on in the process vessel.
11.5.4 Auctioneering control loop:
This kind of control loop is normally used for a huge vessel where readings of a single
variable may be different at different locations. This type of control loop ensures safe
operation because it employs all the readings of different locations simultaneously, and
compares them with the set point, then the controller sends appropriate signal to final
control element.
11.5.5 Split range loop:
In this loop controller is preset with different values corresponding to different actions to
be taken at different conditions. The advantage of this loop is to maintain the proper
conditions and avoid abnormalities at very differential levels.
Page 119
This is a control in which two or more control loops are arranged so that the output of one
controlling element adjusts the set point of another controlling element. This control loop
is used where proper and quick control is difficult by simple feed forward or feed
backward control. Normally first loop is a feedback control loop.
Nomenclature:
TC = Temperature Controller
TT = Temperature Transmitter
Primary Controller
Set Point
TC
TT
115 degree C
Secondary Controller
TC
TT
Dowtherm In
Dowtherm Out
Page 120
Page 121
Since an increase in feed rate increases reflux rate with vapor rate being approximately
constant, purity of top product increases.
11.7.6 Disadvantage
The overhead reflux change depends on the dynamics of level control system that adjusts
it.
Page 122
Chapter 12
HAZOP Study
Page 123
Introduction
An important element of any system for the prevention of major accidents is conducting a
hazard and operability study (HAZOP) at the detail design stage, of the plant in general
and the operating and safety control systems in particular. HAZOPs seek to minimize the
effect of an atypical situation in the operation/process by ensuring that control and other
safety systems such as functional safety (e.g. emergency safe shutdown) are in place and
work with a high level of reliability to achieve a safe outcome from a situation that could
have resulted in a major accident.
The HAZOP process is used to identify potential hazards and operational problems in
terms of plant design and human error. The technique is applied during final design of the
process and plant items before commencement of construction.
HAZOPs have also proven to provide financial benefits to the plant owner/operator by
minimizing the time and money spent in installing add on control and safety systems, the
need for which may become evident at the time of plant commissioning in the absence of
a HAZOP. On the operability front benefits are gained by implementing at design stage,
the remedial recommendations to operability issues identified during the HAZOP.
Page 124
to test the integrity of each part of the design will explore every conceivable way in
which operation could deviate from the design intention.
Some of the causes may be so unlikely that the derived consequences will be rejected as
not being meaningful. Some of the consequences may be trivial and need be considered
no further. However, there may be some deviations with causes that are conceivable and
consequences that arc potentially serious. The potential problems are then noted for
remedial action. The immediate solution to a problem may not be obvious and could need
further consideration either by a team member or perhaps a specialist. All decisions taken
must be recorded.
The main advantage of this technique is its systematic thoroughness in failure case
identification. The method may be used at the design stage, when plant alterations or
extensions are to be made, or applied to an existing facility
18
Intention
ii.
Deviation
iii.
Causes
iv.
Consequences
Hazards
Operating Difficulties
v.
Safeguards
vi.
Corrective Action.
Typically, a member of the team would outline the purpose of a chosen line in the
process and how it is expected to operate. The various guide words such as MORE are
selected in turn. Consideration will then be given to what could cause the deviation.
Following this, the results of a deviation, such as the creation of a hazardous situation or
operational difficulty, are considered. When the considered events are credible and the
18
Page 125
effects significant, existing safeguards should be evaluated and a decision then taken as to
what additional measures could be required to eliminate the identified cause. A more
detailed reliability analysis such as risk or consequence quantification may be required to
determine whether the frequency or outcome of an event is high enough to justify major
design changes.
The process designer very briefly outlines the broad purpose of the section of
design under study and displays the P&ID (or equivalent) where it can be readily
seen by all team members.
ii.
Any general questions about the scope and intent of the design are discussed.
iii.
The first pipeline or relevant part for study is selected, usually one in which a
major material flow enters that section of the plant.
iv.
The process designer explains in detail its purpose, design features, operating
conditions, fittings, instrumentation and protective systems, etc., and details of
the vessels immediately upstream or downstream of it.
v.
Any general questions about the pipeline or relevant part are then discussed.
vi.
The detailed 'line by line' study commences at this point. The discussion leader
takes the group through the guide words chosen as relevant. Each guide word or
prompt, such as HIGH FLOW, identifies a deviation from normal operating
conditions. This is used to prompt discussion of the possible causes and effects of
flow at an undesirably high rate. If, in the opinion of the study team, the
combination of the consequences and the likelihood of occurrence are sufficient
to warrant action, then the combination is regarded as a 'problem' and minuted as
such. If the existing safeguards are deemed to be sufficient then no further action
is required. For major risk areas the need for action may be assessed
quantitatively using such techniques as Hazard Analysis (HAZAN) or Reliability
Analysis. For less critical risks the assessment is usually based on experience and
judgement. The person responsible for defining the corrective action is also
nominated.
Page 126
vii.
It should always be remembered that the main aim of the meeting is to find
problems needing solution, rather than the actual solution. The group should not
be tied down by trying to resolve a problem, It is better to proceed with the study,
deferring consideration of the unsolved problems to a later date.
viii.
When the guide word requires no more consideration, the chairperson refers the
team to the next guide word.
ix.
Discussion of each guide word is confined to the section or pipeline marked, the
vessels at each end and any equipment, such as pumps or heat exchangers, in
between.
x.
When all guide words have been covered, the line is fully highlighted to show
that it has been completed, and the next line is chosen.
xi.
When all the lines in a plant sub-section have been reviewed, additional guide
words are used for review (overview) of the P&ID as a whole.
ii.
iii.
How well the team is able to use the systematic method as an aid to identifying
deviations
iv.
v.
The competence of the chairperson in ensuring the study team rigorously follows
sound procedures.
HAZOP team
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
recording of meeting
Page 127
vi.
follow up plan
Page 128
Page 129
GUIDE
CAUSE
CONSEQUENCE
RECOMMENDAT
WORD
High flow
ION
Flow
controller
fault
Product
re-boiler
attempt
to
will
maintain
capacity
is
reached.
The
column
stops
operating.
Low flow
1.
Product
feed
pump
Temperature
rise
in
column.
failed.
2.
column.
Isolating
Over-heating.
valve
jammed.
High level
Level
Flooding
controller
of
L6
and
fault
High
level
alarm,
independent of level
controller LIC.
Alarm level below L6.
High pressure
Water failure
in condenser.
a relief device.
No adverse effect.
Pressure indicator on
column.
High pressure alarm,
plus trip on gas/air
control valve V1.
Reverse flow
Cooling
of
condenser
Consider N2 purge.
on cooling.
and H3 after
shut down.
Page 130
Chapter # 13
Environmental
Impact Assessment
Page 131
The purpose of the assessment is to ensure that decision makers consider the ensuing
environmental impacts when deciding whether or not to proceed with a project. The
International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) defines an environmental impact
assessment as "the process of identifying, predicting, evaluating and mitigating
the biophysical, social, and other relevant effects of development proposals prior to major
decisions being taken and commitments made."
EIA as it is practiced today is being used as a decision aiding tool rather than decision
making tool. However, as well as direct effects, developments cause a multitude of
indirect effects through consumption of goods and services, production of building
materials and machinery, additional land use for activities of various manufacturing and
industrial services, mining of resources etc. The indirect effects of developments are
often an order of magnitude higher than the direct effects assessed by EIA. Large
proposals such as airports or ship yards cause wide ranging national as well as
international environmental effects, which should be taken into consideration during the
decision-making process.
Modified Ahmad, Y.J. and Sammy G.K.(1985) Guidelines to Environmental Impact Assessment, Hodder
and Stoughton, London
Page 132
3) Baseline Study
4) Environmental Impact Evaluation
5) Mitigation Measures
6) Assessment of Alternative Measures
7) Preparation of Final Document
8) Decision-making
9) Monitoring of Project Implementation and Its Environmental Impacts
Preliminary activities include the defining of the Terms of Reference (TOR)for the
project and also the determining of the personnel required for the assessment. A brief
summary of the project is extremely helpful at this stage. The summary should be clear
and explicit and should list exactly what the development project entails.
13.2.2 Scoping
The existing laws and regulations that are applicable to the project should also be
reviewed along with the regulating authorities. The same procedure must be adopted for
technical, financial and managerial resources available for the project.
It is very important to identify the team that will carry out the EIA procedure along with a
coordinator and the decision-maker who will read the final report.
Members of the EIA team usually have the specialized professional expertise of different
areas related to the various aspects of the project. Thus, an EIA team might include an
engineer, an economist, a physical geographer and a sociologist, with a senior
government official to play the role of a coordinator.
All these need to be identified and declared before the actual EIA process may begin.
The composition of the EIA team varies from country to country. In the United States,
the developer carries out the functions of both the EIA preparation, and the decisionmaking with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), involved only in reviewing
and monitoring the project. In other countries, a government organization may actually
carry out the EIA process. Some countries may not have the appropriate means and
facilities for this purpose, and therefore, in such cases, a team of consultants may be
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 133
employed to help with the assessment. This often turns out to be an expensive
proposition. A team partly of local governmental personnel and partly of consultants
might serve the purpose very well in such cases. Similarly, the decision-maker may be a
person, a committee, or a number of organizations, etc.
The following techniques are used for scoping:
i.
Checklist technique
ii.
Matrix technique
iii.
Networks technique
iv.
Overlay technique15
A baseline study is the study of the original status of the environment in the area before
the development work of the project is started. This study serves the purpose of a base
reference against which the changes due to implementation of the project are measured.
Baseline studies are based on the experience with respect to environmental aspects and
cover everything important about the environmental impacts of the project. On the other
hand, a proper scoping highlights the significant environmental issues of the project with
respect to its locality and regional environment. Hence, scoping and baseline studies
often run into each other. Baseline studies are rather easily carried out in the countries
where the required technical expertise, long-term database for environmental measures
(for instance in the case of river flow)and relevant research papers and reports are
available for the area concerned.
Thus, the baseline studies are more easily prepared in developed countries. The local
expertise, such as consulting a forester or a soil scientist, could be utilized instead to
complete the baseline studies in the developing countries. In such cases, the team
responsible for the EIA must have the ability to find out the appropriate personnel for the
required information.
Page 134
impacts affecting the project. This step is generally considered as the most technical in
nature and therefore is the most difficult and controversial part of the EIA. It is difficult
because not every impact, especially natural and social impacts, can be quantified. For
example, it is very difficult to agree on a number that can sum up all the negative impacts
of deforestation. Occasionally, it is possible to use surrogate measures, such as the
amount of money required to mitigate the damage or the amount of money local
inhabitants are willing to pay to clean up the river. However, the accuracy and
appropriateness of such techniques can be questioned. Again, an existing data set can be
extremely useful for impact evaluation, but it is also costly.
Impact evaluation actually calls for very careful considerations of the most important
impacts and their accurate numerical representation. This has to be done not only for the
proposed project but also for all possible alternatives, so that a well-balanced final
decision can be reached regarding the fate of the project. Impact evaluation is therefore
dependent on the quality of the scoping that is done earlier on the project.
Page 135
each version of the project is given together with the comparative assessment using
benefit-cost analysis (BCA). Benefit-cost analysis has a long history of use as a method
for evaluating development projects and therefore is popular with a very wide range of
people, such as, engineers, economists, bureaucrats, etc. However, there is a difficulty in
the assessment as not everything is quantifiable. There is no exact numerical
representation for a beautiful view, for instance, although attempts have been made to
describe such situations numerically. Therefore, not all assessments use net benefit
criteria. The benefit-cost analysis, when used, is equally applied to all options to make
the comparative assessment easy. For instance, it is more desirable to put up with limited
pollution at a lower cost of mitigation than to remove the pollution completely at a much
higher cost.
13.2.7
Preparation of the final document should meet the following two objectives.
First is to prepare a complete and detailed account of the EIA. The second is to prepare a
brief summarized account for a decision-maker, who may not be a technical person.
The detailed document is usually called as the reference document. This document is
used by the technical personnel that is associate with the project. It is also referred for
preparing future EIAs in the same geographical area, or for the same type of project in a
different area
The summarized non-technical account is usually called as the working document, which
is written clearly without using technical language to communicate to the decision-maker
the findings of the EIA team. Main objective of this document is that the non-technical
decision-makers must properly understand the findings and recommendations of the EIA
team so that they can take a well-informed and correct decision promptly.
13.2.8 Decision-making
Decision-making is the process which starts after the above-mentioned steps of EIA are
completed. Usually the decision is taken by a manager or committee, or personnel from
the concerned ministry who had not been associated with the EIA during its preparation.
Production of Methanol from Coal
Page 136
Technical and economic aspects of project alternatives are thoroughly considered but, at
times, political expediency and project feasibility control the final choice.
In general, a decision-maker has three choices:
returning the EIA with a request for further study in certain specific areas
20
i.
ii.
Other gaseous emissions will include exhaust from vehicles and generators.
The principles sources of potential air emissions to atmosphere during the operational
phase are:
i.
Reformer flue gas from the primary flue gas stack: The natural gas fuel to the
primary reformer is normally de sulphureted and therefore SO2 emissions will be
zero. The burner selected for the reformer will be low NOx, and hence NOx
content of the flue gases will be designed to be less than 300 mg/ Nm3.
Furthermore, the reformer flue gases will have a particulate level of less than 100
20
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) for a proposed methanol facility in Damietta Port,
WorleyParsons Komex (resources and energy)
Page 137
mg/ Nm3. The effluent will consist of water, carbon dioxide, oxygen, nitrogen,
and argon. Of less than 100 mg/Nm3. The disposal method will be via flue gas
stack to atmosphere at 18.5 meter height stack.
ii.
ATR jacket vent: This effluent is mainly steam vented to the atmosphere.
ii.
Package boiler intermittent blow down drum vent: Vent only occurs during
periods of intermittent blow down from the package boiler drum.
iii.
iv.
Fire water pumps diesel engine exhaust: These pumps are only run in case of fire
and weekly testing (i.e. intermittent flow rate). The composition of the exhaust is
similar to combustion products. The exhaust is vented to the atmosphere at 5.4
meter height.
v.
vi.
Ship loading vent gas scrubber from vapor recovery package: The main
composition of this intermittent flow which occurs only during periods of ship
loading is nitrogen or air, and methanol.
vii.
Truck loading vent: The composition of this intermittent flow which occurs only
during periods of truck loading is mainly oxygen, nitrogen, and methanol.
Natural gas liquid drum vent: Typical composition of this effluent is natural gas
which will be vented to flare.
ii.
Compressor seal gas losses from compressor seal systems: The composition will
vary dependent on plant operation. Seal gas is typically the same composition as
the compressor discharge gases.
Page 138
Noise
ii.
iii.
iv.
The methanol plant has a significant number of major noise sources during the
operational phase, including:
i.
Compressors
ii.
Turbines
iii.
Air Coolers;
iv.
v.
Primary reformer;
vi.
Pumps
vii.
Flares.
viii.
13.3.3 Water
Pollution problems related to water, during normal operation, may occur due to process
condensates or due to the scrubbing of gases. Carbon dioxide & other toxic based
effluents discharged into the regions waterways, under some conditions, depending on
water pH and temperature can become highly toxic to fish and other animals living in the
water. These substances are not found to be bio -accumulative, or to transfer up the food
chain. Freshwater organisms are most at risk from releases of these gases in the aquatic
environment because they highly soluble in water. These gases considered to be entering
the aquatic environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that have or
may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the regions environment or its
biological diversity.
Page 139